<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd">
<channel>
<title>BloggingStocks</title>
<link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com</link>
<description>BloggingStocks</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Poll: Americans more-optimistic about U.S. economy, president's performance]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/04/07/poll-americans-more-optimistic-about-u-s-economy-presidents/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/04/07/poll-americans-more-optimistic-about-u-s-economy-presidents/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/04/07/poll-americans-more-optimistic-about-u-s-economy-presidents/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/forecasts/" rel="tag">Forecasts</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/good-news/" rel="tag">Good news</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/headline-news/" rel="tag">Headline News</a></p><p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.dailyfinance.com/media/2009/04/barack_obama_flag_200.jpg" alt="" />Despite a deepening job slump and few signs that the recession that began in December 2007 is nearing an end, Americans have grown more optimistic about the U.S. economy and the country's direction in the 11 weeks since the inauguration of President Obama, the latest <a href="http://documents.nytimes.com/new-york-times-cbs-news-poll-on-the-approval-ratings-of-president-barack-obama#p=2">New York Times/CBS News poll shows</a>.</p>
<p>Further, Americans approve of President Obama's handling of the economy, foreign policy, (wars in Iraq and Afghanistan), and two-thirds said they approved of his overall job performance.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/04/07/poll-americans-more-optimistic-about-u-s-economy-presidents/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Poll: Americans more-optimistic about U.S. economy, president's performance</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/04/07/poll-americans-more-optimistic-about-u-s-economy-presidents/">Poll: Americans more-optimistic about U.S. economy, president's performance</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 07 Apr 2009 15:50:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/04/07/poll-americans-more-optimistic-about-u-s-economy-presidents/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1510252/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/04/07/poll-americans-more-optimistic-about-u-s-economy-presidents/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>approval rating</category><category>CBS</category><category>CBS Corp.</category><category>Democratic Party</category><category>New York Times</category><category>NYT</category><category>Obama</category><category>optimism</category><category>polls</category><category>President Obama</category><category>public opinion</category><category>Republican Party</category><category>survey research</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Joseph Lazzaro]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 07 Apr 2009 15:50:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Serious Money: Frustration is not apathy!]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/03/serious-money-frustration-is-not-apathy/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/03/serious-money-frustration-is-not-apathy/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/03/serious-money-frustration-is-not-apathy/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/management/" rel="tag">Management</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/rants-and-raves/" rel="tag">Rants and Raves</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/scandals/" rel="tag">Scandals</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/politics/" rel="tag">Politics</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/serious-money/" rel="tag">Serious Money</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/recession/" rel="tag">Recession</a></p><img hspace="4" height="190" border="1" align="right" width="286" vspace="4" style="width: 297px; height: 200px;" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2009/03/overmyer.jpg" />One of our reader's who blesses us with frequent comment's, <span class="cmt_authorname" id="cmt_auth_17400915">B. Harrison,</span> left the following tidbit for us recently (responding to: <a title="View comment 17400915 on www.bloggingstocks.com" href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/28/buffet-suffers-big-losses-at-berkshire-hathaway/#c17400915" target="_blank">Buffett suffers big losses at Berkshire Hathaway</a>) and I thought I would share it because this sentiment comes to us frequently. <br />
<ul>
    <li>"And the American people are simply apathetically sitting back while our CORRUPT Congress who enabled and allowed all of the corporate FRAUDS, continues to allow the CORRUPT CEOs and Boards of Directors run those corporations, and to keep their ill gotten "weath" that they amassed while mismanaging the corporations, and orchestrating and perpetuating all of those FRAUDS." </li>
</ul>
I do not agree that the American people are "apathetically sitting back".... They are voicing their opinions on the web, in letters and emails to their representatives, they take to the streets and protest, they sell the stock of poorly run companies and file class action suits. The truth is that they are frustrated because <strong>our representatives have an unwavering singular focus, and that is to sustain themselves in office</strong>. Nothing takes a higher priority then that; it's called political self preservation.<br /><span class="symbol"></span>
<ul> </ul><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/03/serious-money-frustration-is-not-apathy/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Serious Money: Frustration is not apathy!</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/03/serious-money-frustration-is-not-apathy/">Serious Money: Frustration is not apathy!</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 03 Mar 2009 14:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/03/serious-money-frustration-is-not-apathy/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1475007/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/03/serious-money-frustration-is-not-apathy/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>AIG</category><category>Berkshire Hathaway</category><category>BerkshireHathaway</category><category>BRK.A</category><category>BRK.B</category><category>C</category><category>citigroup</category><category>corporategovernance</category><category>executive compensation</category><category>ExecutiveCompensation</category><category>general motors</category><category>GeneralMotors</category><category>GM</category><category>governance</category><category>inthenews</category><category>politics</category><category>public opinion</category><category>PublicOpinion</category><category>Sheldon Liber</category><category>SheldonLiber</category><category>Warren Buffett</category><category>WarrenBuffett</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Sheldon Liber]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 03 Mar 2009 14:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Bailed out bank executives, if smart, will accept Obama's $500k cap]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/04/bailed-out-bank-executives-if-smart-will-accept-obamas-500k/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/04/bailed-out-bank-executives-if-smart-will-accept-obamas-500k/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/04/bailed-out-bank-executives-if-smart-will-accept-obamas-500k/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/politics/" rel="tag">Politics</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/recession/" rel="tag">Recession</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/financial-crisis/" rel="tag">Financial Crisis</a></p>With the Obama administration's <a href="http://money.aol.com/news/articles/_a/bbdp/obama-details-plan-to-cap-executive-pay/328073">$500,000 executive pay cap</a> for bailed out companies imposed, the more important and more determining question concerns how the American people respond. <br /><br />Ironically, the public's reaction may hinge on how Wall Street and the broader financial community reacts.<br /><br />Historically, Americans have opposed pay caps and generally looked unfavorably on government -- particularly federal government -- efforts to interfere with market-based valuations of talent / labor. In a nutshell, the public favors a minimum wage but believes "the sky's the limit" regarding compensation; if a board of directors, business partner or negotiated contract says you're worth $10 million a year in salary and bonus, then you deserve $10 million year.<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/04/bailed-out-bank-executives-if-smart-will-accept-obamas-500k/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Bailed out bank executives, if smart, will accept Obama's $500k cap</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/04/bailed-out-bank-executives-if-smart-will-accept-obamas-500k/">Bailed out bank executives, if smart, will accept Obama's $500k cap</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 04 Feb 2009 19:30:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/04/bailed-out-bank-executives-if-smart-will-accept-obamas-500k/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1450443/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/04/bailed-out-bank-executives-if-smart-will-accept-obamas-500k/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>bailout bill</category><category>Congress</category><category>Democrats</category><category>executive compensation</category><category>Geithner</category><category>inthenews</category><category>Obama</category><category>Obama administration</category><category>pay cap</category><category>public opinion</category><category>Republicans</category><category>rescue bill</category><category>TARP</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Joseph Lazzaro]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 04 Feb 2009 19:30:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[When evaluating economic polls, subtract 15-20% ]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/20/when-evaluating-economic-polls-subtract-15-20/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/20/when-evaluating-economic-polls-subtract-15-20/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/20/when-evaluating-economic-polls-subtract-15-20/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/politics/" rel="tag">Politics</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/recession/" rel="tag">Recession</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/financial-crisis/" rel="tag">Financial Crisis</a></p>A note on economic polls: when evaluating them, subtract 15-20%. Case in point: U.S. public opinion toward outgoing President George W. Bush. <br /><br />A <a href="http://www.cnn.com/2009/POLITICS/01/14/bush.political.legacy/?iref=hpmostpop">CNN/Opinion Research Corporation poll</a> taken in December 2008 found the following: <br /><br />Despite the worst U.S. recession in decades, rising unemployment, declining median incomes, unprecedented home foreclosures, massive U.S. government borrowing to bailout / rescue the bank sector, and the lowest job creation of any eight-year president in the modern era, the poll found that: <br />
<ul>
    <li>23% of the American people said they would miss Bush, 25% said Bush managed government effectively, and about a third said he would go down in history as a good president. </li>
</ul>
Roughly a third of Americans viewing Bush as a good president?, with 25% saying he managed the government effectively? What's going on here? <br /><br />Who are these people? Upper-income Americans or strong Republicans? <br /><br />Exactly: either, or possibly both, which is why you need to deduct 15-20% when reading a poll, to gauge a president's support, particularly on economic issues.<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/20/when-evaluating-economic-polls-subtract-15-20/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>When evaluating economic polls, subtract 15-20% </em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/20/when-evaluating-economic-polls-subtract-15-20/">When evaluating economic polls, subtract 15-20% </a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 20 Jan 2009 13:10:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/20/when-evaluating-economic-polls-subtract-15-20/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1434837/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/20/when-evaluating-economic-polls-subtract-15-20/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Bush</category><category>Bush administration</category><category>George W. Bush</category><category>polls</category><category>public opinion</category><category>survey research</category><category>SurveyResearch</category><category>U.S. economy</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Joseph Lazzaro]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 20 Jan 2009 13:10:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Economists: Pass bailout bill with an equity stake for U.S. taxpayers]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/09/24/economists-pass-bailout-bill-with-an-equity-stake-for-u-s-taxp/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/09/24/economists-pass-bailout-bill-with-an-equity-stake-for-u-s-taxp/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/09/24/economists-pass-bailout-bill-with-an-equity-stake-for-u-s-taxp/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/international-markets/" rel="tag">International Markets</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/forecasts/" rel="tag">Forecasts</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/other-issues/" rel="tag">Other Issues</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/politics/" rel="tag">Politics</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/financial-crisis/" rel="tag">Financial Crisis</a></p>The U.S. Treasury's <a href="http://www.ustreas.gov/">$700 billion bailout bill</a> is winding its way through the Congress. <br /><br />To say the situation is dynamic and fluid would be the understatement of the year. The Congress, led by U.S. Rep. Barney Frank (D-Mass.), chairman of the House Financial Services Committee, and U.S. Sen. Chris Dodd (D-Conn.), chairman of the Senate Banking Committee, is likely to propose and obtain substantial changes in the legislation, changes it believes will better protect the U.S. taxpayer and more efficiently deploy the. funds allocated.<br /><br />The American people, if public opinion polls are an accurate gauge, are skeptical of the plan at best, and at worst view it as rewarding large financial institutions and other companies whose flawed practices both perpetuated and magnified the crisis.<br /> <br />In addition, with <a href="http://www.npr.org/news/specials/election2008/2008-election-map.html#/senate-nprOvM/">an election up ahead</a> in about a month, Congress (particularly the 435 representatives and 35 senators up for re-election) will be especially sensitive to public opinion, with many not wanting to go against it for fear of being voted out of office. <br /><strong><br />Is the bailout bill a solution?</strong>
<p>With the above as a backdrop, BloggingStocks Wednesday asked three economists, David H. Wang, Richard Felson, and Peter Dawson, for their policy recommendation.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/09/24/economists-pass-bailout-bill-with-an-equity-stake-for-u-s-taxp/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Economists: Pass bailout bill with an equity stake for U.S. taxpayers</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/09/24/economists-pass-bailout-bill-with-an-equity-stake-for-u-s-taxp/">Economists: Pass bailout bill with an equity stake for U.S. taxpayers</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 24 Sep 2008 14:15:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/09/24/economists-pass-bailout-bill-with-an-equity-stake-for-u-s-taxp/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1323423/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/09/24/economists-pass-bailout-bill-with-an-equity-stake-for-u-s-taxp/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>bailout bill</category><category>banking sector</category><category>Barney Frank</category><category>bond market</category><category>Chris Dodd</category><category>credit crunch</category><category>credit markets</category><category>financial crisis</category><category>fiscal policy</category><category>foreclosures</category><category>gdp</category><category>inthenews</category><category>mortgage backed securities</category><category>mortgages</category><category>Paulson</category><category>public opinion</category><category>taxpayers</category><category>U.S. Congress</category><category>U.S. economy</category><category>U.S. Treasury</category><category>voters</category><category>voting</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Joseph Lazzaro]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 24 Sep 2008 14:15:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[As housing prices go, public's verdict on economic policies follow]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/09/as-housing-prices-go-publics-verdict-on-economic-policies-foll/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/09/as-housing-prices-go-publics-verdict-on-economic-policies-foll/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/09/as-housing-prices-go-publics-verdict-on-economic-policies-foll/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/economic-data/" rel="tag">Economic Data</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/politics/" rel="tag">Politics</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/housing/" rel="tag">Housing</a></p>Are public attitudes toward the U.S. government's economic policy linked to housing prices? <br /><br />There are other factors involved, but over the past three decades there has been a correlation between the two conditions, <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2008/06/07/business/07chart.html?scp=1&amp;sq=%22Where+housing+prices+go%22&amp;st=nyt">The New York Times reported.</a><br /><br />When home prices are rising at a pace moderately faster than inflation, consumers tend to think well of the U.S. Government's economic policies, <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2008/06/07/business/07chart.html?scp=1&amp;sq=%22Where+housing+prices+go%22&amp;st=nyt">The Times reported, citing Haver Analytics.</a><br /><br />For example, during the U.S. housing market's two, prior housing booms, 1984-1987 during the Reagan Administration, and 1996-1998 during the Clinton Administration, consumers, on average, approved of the government's economic policies, <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2008/06/07/business/07chart.html?scp=1&amp;sq=%22Where+housing+prices+go%22&amp;st=nyt">The Times reported.</a><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/09/as-housing-prices-go-publics-verdict-on-economic-policies-foll/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>As housing prices go, public's verdict on economic policies follow</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/09/as-housing-prices-go-publics-verdict-on-economic-policies-foll/">As housing prices go, public's verdict on economic policies follow</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 09 Jun 2008 18:42:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/09/as-housing-prices-go-publics-verdict-on-economic-policies-foll/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1220352/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/09/as-housing-prices-go-publics-verdict-on-economic-policies-foll/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Bill Clinton</category><category>Bush</category><category>Bush Administration</category><category>Clinton Administration</category><category>gdp</category><category>home prices</category><category>housing sector</category><category>median home prices</category><category>public opinion</category><category>Reagan</category><category>Reagan Administration</category><category>surveys</category><category>U.S. economy</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Joseph Lazzaro]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 09 Jun 2008 18:42:00 EST</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
