<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd">
<channel>
<title>BloggingStocks</title>
<link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com</link>
<description>BloggingStocks</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Martin Wolf: Making the United States safe for globalization]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/02/martin-wolf-making-the-united-states-safe-for-globalization/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/02/martin-wolf-making-the-united-states-safe-for-globalization/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/02/martin-wolf-making-the-united-states-safe-for-globalization/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/international-markets/" rel="tag">International Markets</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/other-issues/" rel="tag">Other Issues</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/politics/" rel="tag">Politics</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/recession/" rel="tag">Recession</a></p>The ever-incisive FT columnist <a href="http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/f860b602-2689-11dd-9c95-000077b07658.html">Martin Wolf</a> reminds us that while globalization's prize is plus-sum (everyone gains), as opposed to zero-sum (Country A gains only if Country B loses), it is not perfect sum (there are costs) nor egalitarian sum (everyone gains equally).<br /><br />The biggest advantage of globalization, in <a href="http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/f860b602-2689-11dd-9c95-000077b07658.html">Wolf's view?</a> The spread of prosperity, including a wider distribution of innovation and bigger opportunities for profitable exchange/trade. Also valuable, although not guaranteed, Wolf says, is increased political stability in previously impoverished countries. <br /><br /><strong>Globalization marches on</strong><br /><br />Further, in the globalization era's first decade, the United States can't do anything to halt the flow of ideas, and the diffusion of knowledge, skills, technology systems, and so forth, Wolf argues. Or at least the United States<em> can't do anything decent</em> to stop globalization.<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/02/martin-wolf-making-the-united-states-safe-for-globalization/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Martin Wolf: Making the United States safe for globalization</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/02/martin-wolf-making-the-united-states-safe-for-globalization/">Martin Wolf: Making the United States safe for globalization</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 02 Jun 2008 18:25:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/02/martin-wolf-making-the-united-states-safe-for-globalization/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1213011/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/02/martin-wolf-making-the-united-states-safe-for-globalization/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>2008 election</category><category>China</category><category>Clinton</category><category>corporate America</category><category>emerging markets</category><category>exports</category><category>GDP</category><category>globalization</category><category>imports</category><category>income taxes</category><category>India</category><category>McCain</category><category>Obama</category><category>protectionism</category><category>public policy</category><category>taxes</category><category>trade</category><category>United States</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Joseph Lazzaro]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 02 Jun 2008 18:25:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Young adult vote could surge in 2008, driven by Obama, Internet factors]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/02/12/young-adult-vote-could-surge-in-2008-driven-by-obama-internet/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/02/12/young-adult-vote-could-surge-in-2008-driven-by-obama-internet/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/02/12/young-adult-vote-could-surge-in-2008-driven-by-obama-internet/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/politics/" rel="tag">Politics</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/presidential-elections/" rel="tag">Presidential Elections</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/02/obamapict..jpg" />Social scientists, unlike some journalists, are reluctant to label anything a trend until they've amassed and evaluated a great deal of data often over years. A journalist can always cite a lack of information, or the crush of daily (and shorter) deadlines as a reason his/her news story did not describe reality, but if a social scientist errs in a refereed-article, well let's just say the action is not conducive to career advancement. <br /><br />And that's why many social scientists are reluctant to comment on the impact of Sen. Barack Obama's (D-IL) run for the U.S. presidency: it's way too early to articulate informed conclusions that are likely to endure. <br /><br />Still, that's not to say that one can't comment on developments that may -- and underscoring "may" -- be indicative of a trend. And along that line, here's what we know about the Obama candidacy regarding voting behavior:<span style="font-weight: bold;"></span><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/02/12/young-adult-vote-could-surge-in-2008-driven-by-obama-internet/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Young adult vote could surge in 2008, driven by Obama, Internet factors</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/02/12/young-adult-vote-could-surge-in-2008-driven-by-obama-internet/">Young adult vote could surge in 2008, driven by Obama, Internet factors</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 12 Feb 2008 12:20:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/02/12/young-adult-vote-could-surge-in-2008-driven-by-obama-internet/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1112451/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/02/12/young-adult-vote-could-surge-in-2008-driven-by-obama-internet/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>2000 election</category><category>2008 election</category><category>blogs</category><category>Bush</category><category>Clinton</category><category>Democrats</category><category>Gore</category><category>interest groups</category><category>Internet</category><category>McCain</category><category>Obama</category><category>public policy</category><category>Republicans</category><category>social network sites</category><category>survey research</category><category>U.S. Congress</category><category>U.S. presidency</category><category>voting</category><category>voting behavior</category><category>world wide web</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Joseph Lazzaro]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 12 Feb 2008 12:20:00 EST</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
