<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd">
<channel>
<title>BloggingStocks</title>
<link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com</link>
<description>BloggingStocks</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Economy Adds Only 36,000 Jobs in January]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2011/02/04/economy-adds-only-36-000-jobs-in-january/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2011/02/04/economy-adds-only-36-000-jobs-in-january/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2011/02/04/economy-adds-only-36-000-jobs-in-january/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/economic-data/" rel="tag">Economic Data</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/federal-reserve/" rel="tag">Federal Reserve</a></p><p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2010/04/dol-logo-1270224022.jpg"  alt="Department of Labor" />The jobs number is disappointing at best. Only 36,000 jobs were added in January, according to the <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748704709304576123862334939594.html?mod=WSJ_hp_LEFTTopStories"><em>Wall Street Journal</em></a>. Dow Jones news wires had forecast an increase of 136,000. The unemployment rate fell to 9%.</p>
<p>The key reason for such a poor showing was bad weather. However, the December number was increased to 121,000 jobs, from 103,000.</p>
<p>Commenting on the jobs situation, Federal Reserve chairman Ben Bernanke said: "Until we see a sustained period of stronger job creation, we cannot consider the recovery to be truly established."</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2011/02/04/economy-adds-only-36-000-jobs-in-january/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Economy Adds Only 36,000 Jobs in January</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2011/02/04/economy-adds-only-36-000-jobs-in-january/">Economy Adds Only 36,000 Jobs in January</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 04 Feb 2011 17:20:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2011/02/04/economy-adds-only-36-000-jobs-in-january/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19829066/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2011/02/04/economy-adds-only-36-000-jobs-in-january/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>hourly earnings</category><category>inthenews</category><category>public sector</category><category>unemployment private sector</category><category>unemployment rate</category><category>workweek</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Connie Madon]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 04 Feb 2011 17:20:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Massachusetts postpones $750 million short-term debt sale due to credit crunch]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/10/07/massachusetts-postpones-750-million-short-term-debt-sale-due-to/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/10/07/massachusetts-postpones-750-million-short-term-debt-sale-due-to/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/10/07/massachusetts-postpones-750-million-short-term-debt-sale-due-to/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/federal-reserve/" rel="tag">Federal Reserve</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/recession/" rel="tag">Recession</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/financial-crisis/" rel="tag">Financial Crisis</a></p>To see the impact of credit market strain in the United States one need not travel farther west than The Bay State.<br /><br />On Tuesday, Massachusetts, which would rank in the top 100 countries in the world in terms of GDP if ranked as a nation, <a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&amp;sid=a0yGp9Vs_URE&amp;refer=home">postponed</a> the sale of $750 million in short-term notes for the second time in two weeks, due to a lack of demand.<br /><br />However, it should be pointed out that Massachusetts's decision occurred before <a href="http://federalreserve.gov/newsevents/press/monetary/20081007c.htm">the U.S. Federal Reserve's decision</a>, announced Tuesday at 9 a.m. EDT, to buy all corporate commercial paper to ease tight credit markets. <br /><br />Further, although the municipal market differs from the corporate commercial paper market, the Fed's action aimed at easing conditions in the credit market overall, via both guaranteeing debt payment and by moral suasion. Many economists see this as the Fed's attempt to change market psychology via the central bank's enormous financial resources, monetary policy stance, and regulatory powers.
<p>Still, economists caution that the Fed's commercial paper guarantee does not end counterparty risk; it simply eliminates a segment of that counterparty risk. According to economist David H. Wang, more actions by the Fed and U.S. Treasury undoubtedly will be needed to get credit flowing more freely and also reduce perhaps the biggest systemic problem: fear. Commercial paper is about a $1.5 trillion market, while states and local governments borrow about $2.8 trillion, Wang said.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/10/07/massachusetts-postpones-750-million-short-term-debt-sale-due-to/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Massachusetts postpones $750 million short-term debt sale due to credit crunch</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/10/07/massachusetts-postpones-750-million-short-term-debt-sale-due-to/">Massachusetts postpones $750 million short-term debt sale due to credit crunch</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 07 Oct 2008 14:45:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/10/07/massachusetts-postpones-750-million-short-term-debt-sale-due-to/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1335208/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/10/07/massachusetts-postpones-750-million-short-term-debt-sale-due-to/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>banking sector</category><category>banks</category><category>bond market</category><category>credit market</category><category>Fed</category><category>gdp</category><category>interest rates</category><category>inthenews</category><category>Massachusetts</category><category>public sector</category><category>State of Massachusetts</category><category>U.S. Federal Reserve</category><category>U.S. Treasury</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Joseph Lazzaro]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 07 Oct 2008 14:45:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Could U.S. economy, American people tolerate more government intervention?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/09/05/could-u-s-economy-american-people-tolerate-more-government-int/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/09/05/could-u-s-economy-american-people-tolerate-more-government-int/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/09/05/could-u-s-economy-american-people-tolerate-more-government-int/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/forecasts/" rel="tag">Forecasts</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/other-issues/" rel="tag">Other Issues</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/politics/" rel="tag">Politics</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/presidential-elections/" rel="tag">Presidential Elections</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/recession/" rel="tag">Recession</a></p>Could the U.S. economy tolerate, and, equally significant, will the American people push the nation's chief executive, the president, in the direction of more government intervention?<br /><br />The view from here is: probably not. Everything in the American ethos and culture speaks against it. <br /><br />Unlike in <a href="http://us.franceguide.com/">France,</a> where the French Government is simply, "France," Americans, for the most part, view their government -- save defense spending -- usually as part of the problem, not the solution. <span style="font-style: italic;">'Government is best which governs least' </span>is a longstanding Americanism. And most investors/readers know about candidates who say they want to <span style="font-style: italic;">"get the Washington bureaucrats off the backs of the American people"</span> and <span style="font-style: italic;">"clean up the mess in Washington!"</span><br /><br />Americans are anti-central government, and they are anti-state (they generally dislike the limited federal government that exists). In the United States, it is always private first, public second.<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/09/05/could-u-s-economy-american-people-tolerate-more-government-int/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Could U.S. economy, American people tolerate more government intervention?</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/09/05/could-u-s-economy-american-people-tolerate-more-government-int/">Could U.S. economy, American people tolerate more government intervention?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 05 Sep 2008 17:08:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/09/05/could-u-s-economy-american-people-tolerate-more-government-int/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1305838/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/09/05/could-u-s-economy-american-people-tolerate-more-government-int/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>1930s</category><category>capitalism</category><category>corporate capitalism</category><category>credit crunch</category><category>FDR</category><category>federal government</category><category>France</category><category>Franklin D. Roosevelt</category><category>free markets</category><category>gdp</category><category>Great Depression</category><category>McCain</category><category>New Deal</category><category>Obama</category><category>private sector</category><category>public sector</category><category>U.S. economy</category><category>U.S. Government</category><category>U.S. presidency</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Joseph Lazzaro]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 05 Sep 2008 17:08:00 EST</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
