<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd">
<channel>
<title>BloggingStocks</title>
<link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com</link>
<description>BloggingStocks</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Free SkypeOut! But is it brilliant, or a cheap 'stunt'?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/05/15/free-skypeout-but-is-it-brilliant-or-a-cheap-stunt/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/05/15/free-skypeout-but-is-it-brilliant-or-a-cheap-stunt/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/05/15/free-skypeout-but-is-it-brilliant-or-a-cheap-stunt/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/after-the-bell/" rel="tag">After the Bell</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/press-releases/" rel="tag">Press Releases</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/products-and-services/" rel="tag">Products and Services</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/blogs/" rel="tag">Blogs</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/competitive-strategy/" rel="tag">Competitive Strategy</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/ebay/" rel="tag">eBay (EBAY)</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2006/05/skypefree3.jpg" /><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2006/05/skypefree1.jpg" /><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2006/05/skypefree2.jpg" />Skype, eBay's VoIP service, has always been free -- for computer-to-computer calls. But this afternoon, in what some are calling "brilliant," others are calling a "stunt," and still <a href="http://blogs.siliconvalley.com/gmsv/2006/05/well_is_this_do.html">others name</a> the "voice-over-loss-leader protocol," Skype announced via email and <a href="http://share.skype.com/sites/en/2006/05/free_calls_to_all_landlines_an.html">on the company blog</a> that SkypeOut calls from your computer to mobile and land lines throughout the U.S. and Canada would be free. (And, to be clear, calls must both originate and end in the U.S.; and this deal is only good through the end of the year.)<br /><br />Skype, you see, was born in the U.K. and most of its users are European (lots of Finns, evidently, among other Northern Europeans). So although this will certainly cost the company something, the theory is that the users will get hooked on using Skype to order pizza and call friends when they're not in WiFi land and, well, just <em>use Skype</em>, and then create "mindshare."<br /><br /><a href="http://gigaom.com/2006/05/15/skypeoutis-it-really-free/">Om Malik at GigaOm has lots of interesting things to say</a>, like that it's "a nifty stunt to bring the focus back on Skype," that for AIMphone it's not necessarily a negative (after all, he points out, AOL will have an easier time getting their users to call on their existing client than Skype will have getting users to download a whole <em>new</em> client), and, most importantly: this is "only part of an ongoing trend - <a href="http://gigaom.com/2006/03/27/vanishing-voice-revenues/">vanishing voice revenues</a>." <a href="http://www.neomarketing.tv/archives/why_traditional_telecoms_will_lose_against_new_voice_video_over_ip_players.php">At neoMarketing.TV, the prediction</a> for the phone companies is more dire: "The  future for traditional telecom operators is very dark." And everywhere the question: will the internet be able to handle all this <em>bandwidth</em>?<br /><br />Interestingly, the announcement was made after market close and eBay's <a href="http://finance.aol.com/usw/quotes/quotesandnews?sym=EBAY&amp;exch=NAS">stock bounced back a bit from the 26-cent tumble</a> it took today. It's now at $31.32 in after-hours trading.<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/05/15/free-skypeout-but-is-it-brilliant-or-a-cheap-stunt/">Free SkypeOut! But is it brilliant, or a cheap 'stunt'?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 15 May 2006 20:44:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://share.skype.com/sites/en/2006/05/free_calls_to_all_landlines_an.html>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/05/15/free-skypeout-but-is-it-brilliant-or-a-cheap-stunt/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/618672/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/05/15/free-skypeout-but-is-it-brilliant-or-a-cheap-stunt/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>aim phone</category><category>aimphone</category><category>aol</category><category>ebay</category><category>free skype</category><category>free skype out</category><category>free voip</category><category>FreeSkype</category><category>FreeSkypeOut</category><category>FreeVoip</category><category>pr</category><category>pr stunt</category><category>PrStunt</category><category>publicity</category><category>publicity stunt</category><category>PublicityStunt</category><category>skype</category><category>skype free</category><category>skype out</category><category>SkypeFree</category><category>SkypeOut</category><category>stunt</category><category>time warner</category><category>TimeWarner</category><category>twx</category><category>voip</category><category>vonage</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Sarah Gilbert]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 15 May 2006 20:44:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Google sued 'for the children' in PR campaign by Long Island politico]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/05/05/google-sued-for-the-children-in-pr-campaign-by-long-island-pol/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/05/05/google-sued-for-the-children-in-pr-campaign-by-long-island-pol/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/05/05/google-sued-for-the-children-in-pr-campaign-by-long-island-pol/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/bad-news/" rel="tag">Bad News</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/law/" rel="tag">Law</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/blogs/" rel="tag">Blogs</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/goog/" rel="tag">Google (GOOG)</a></p>Can you say "publicity"? Evidently, that's all Jeffrey Toback, a member of the Nassau County (Long Island)legislature knows. He's suing Google <em>for the children</em>, claiming that the <ahref="http://hosted.ap.org/dynamic/stories/G/GOOGLE_CHILD_PORN_SUIT?SITE=CADIU&amp;SECTION=HOME&amp;TEMPLATE=DEFAULT">company'ssearch engine promotes paid ads for child pornography companies</a> [*cough* <ahref="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/04/25/if-ebay-partners-with-microsoft-who-will-be-the-evil-empire/">EVIL!</a>*cough*].<br /><br />Naturally, Google says that it is <em>not</em> "<span class="body">the largest and mostefficient facilitator and distributor of child pornography in th world." And that this is just a publicity stunt.What? No, not really?<br /><br /><a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20060505/0112200.shtml">Mike from Techdirtweighs in</a>, explaining that "the law here is </span> extremely clear: a service provider is not directlyresponsible for what people do on their platform" and calling the lawsuit "ridiculous" and "amisunderstanding both of the law and how Google works." Ridiculous it may be, but Jeffrey Toback's name is oneveryone's lips today. Investors evidently agree with Mike; the <ahref="http://finance.aol.com/usw/quotes/quotesandnews?exch=NAS&amp;sym=E%3ANAS%3AGOOG&amp;from=view_symbol">stock is up$1.50 in intraday trading</a>, to $396.25.<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/05/05/google-sued-for-the-children-in-pr-campaign-by-long-island-pol/">Google sued 'for the children' in PR campaign by Long Island politico</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 05 May 2006 12:30:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20060505/0112200.shtml>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/05/05/google-sued-for-the-children-in-pr-campaign-by-long-island-pol/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/615308/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/05/05/google-sued-for-the-children-in-pr-campaign-by-long-island-pol/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>child porn</category><category>child pornography</category><category>ChildPorn</category><category>ChildPornography</category><category>do no evil</category><category>DoNoEvil</category><category>evil</category><category>evil empire</category><category>EvilEmpire</category><category>goog</category><category>google</category><category>google evil</category><category>GoogleEvil</category><category>jeffrey toback</category><category>JeffreyToback</category><category>lawsuit</category><category>long island</category><category>long island ny</category><category>LongIsland</category><category>LongIslandNy</category><category>microsoft</category><category>msft</category><category>msn</category><category>nassau county</category><category>NassauCounty</category><category>new york</category><category>NewYork</category><category>ny</category><category>porn</category><category>pornography</category><category>publicity</category><category>publicity stunt</category><category>PublicityStunt</category><category>toback</category><category>yahoo</category><category>yhoo</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Sarah Gilbert]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 05 May 2006 12:30:00 EST</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
