<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd">
<channel>
<title>BloggingStocks</title>
<link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com</link>
<description>BloggingStocks</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Pearson Up on Earnings News]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/07/26/pearson-up-on-earnings-news/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/07/26/pearson-up-on-earnings-news/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/07/26/pearson-up-on-earnings-news/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/earnings-reports/" rel="tag">Earnings Reports</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2010/07/pearson.jpg" />Pearson PLC (<a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/pearson-plc/pso/nys">PSO</a>), a publisher of educational materials and financial information, received a nice bid today following the release of some earnings data. At the time of this writing, the stock was higher by nearly 6% to a quote of $15.98. The shares had reached a price of $16.02 earlier in the day, which isn't at all far off from the 52-week high of $16.37. Cool to see an equity near the 52-week high, right?<br />
<br />
The <a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/charts/pearson-plc/pso/nys/tech-chart">one-year chart</a> shows how the stock has recovered after its recent pullback. Will it continue to climb in an upward direction?<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/07/26/pearson-up-on-earnings-news/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Pearson Up on Earnings News</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/07/26/pearson-up-on-earnings-news/">Pearson Up on Earnings News</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 26 Jul 2010 17:30:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/07/26/pearson-up-on-earnings-news/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19569043/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/07/26/pearson-up-on-earnings-news/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>inthenews</category><category>pearson</category><category>Penguin</category><category>PSO</category><category>Publishing</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Steven Mallas]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 26 Jul 2010 17:30:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Playboy: Still a Risk]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/06/30/playboy-restructuring/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/06/30/playboy-restructuring/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/06/30/playboy-restructuring/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/magazines/" rel="tag">Magazines</a></p><p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2010/02/playboy-logo-240.jpg" alt="" />Playboy (<a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/playboy-enterprises-inc/pla/nys">PLA</a>) is a fascinating stock. As with every trade, there are two sides to the story. One side will argue that the stock has bounced nicely off the 52-week low of $2.30, and that it has room to run as the concern continues to alter its model for making money. At some point, the bull might say, the market will become excited and buy the shares.</p>
<p>Interesting thesis. My argument against speculating with this idea is simple: it's Playboy. You might do well; you might not. I don't know how much plainer it can be.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/06/30/playboy-restructuring/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Playboy: Still a Risk</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/06/30/playboy-restructuring/">Playboy: Still a Risk</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 30 Jun 2010 09:30:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/06/30/playboy-restructuring/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19536274/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/06/30/playboy-restructuring/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>featured</category><category>ICON</category><category>iconix</category><category>inthenews</category><category>licensing</category><category>PLA</category><category>playboy</category><category>Publishing</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Steven Mallas]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 30 Jun 2010 09:30:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[New Insurance Product Protects Media]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/03/19/new-insurance-product-protects-media/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/03/19/new-insurance-product-protects-media/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/03/19/new-insurance-product-protects-media/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/competitive-strategy/" rel="tag">Competitive Strategy</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/media-world/" rel="tag">Media World</a></p><p><img hspace="4" border="1" align="right" vspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2010/03/avivalogo.jpg" alt="" />Now if you blame the media, someone else will have to share in the losses.</p>
<p>Insurance company Aviva (<a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/aviva-plc/av/nys" target="_blank">AV</a>) is taking the side of camera-wielding, microphone-thrusting pushy press folks with a new form of protection that will cover everything from electronics to foot-in-mouth syndrome (i.e., liability). The <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/tag/insurance/">insurance</a> product will be available to a variety of companies, including both online and print publishers, broadcasters, photographers and marketing and advertising companies. So, if you're responsible for the news, the ads or the process of putting them in front of eyeballs, <a href="http://www.postonline.co.uk/post/news/1597193/aviva-launches-media-insurance" target="_blank">Aviva probably has you in mind</a>.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/03/19/new-insurance-product-protects-media/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>New Insurance Product Protects Media</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/03/19/new-insurance-product-protects-media/">New Insurance Product Protects Media</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 19 Mar 2010 12:10:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/03/19/new-insurance-product-protects-media/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19406472/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/03/19/new-insurance-product-protects-media/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>av</category><category>aviva</category><category>insurance</category><category>insurance companies</category><category>insurance industry</category><category>inthenews</category><category>liability</category><category>LiabilityInsurance</category><category>media</category><category>print media</category><category>Publisher</category><category>publishers</category><category>Publishing</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tom Johansmeyer]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 12:10:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Playboy Still Not Pretty Enough for My Portfolio]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/02/18/playboy-still-not-pretty-enough-for-my-portfolio/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/02/18/playboy-still-not-pretty-enough-for-my-portfolio/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/02/18/playboy-still-not-pretty-enough-for-my-portfolio/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/earnings-reports/" rel="tag">Earnings Reports</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/magazines/" rel="tag">Magazines</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/media-world/" rel="tag">Media World</a></p><p><img hspace="4" vspace="4" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2010/02/playboy-logo-240.jpg"  alt="" />Playboy Enterprises, Inc. (<a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/playboy-enterprises-inc/pla/nys">PLA</a>) published its quarterly numbers today, and while there were some positive developments, overall, I think it's safe to say that the stock is a risk that should be avoided. Unless, of course, you simply want to roll the dice and speculate.</p>
<p>Hey, nothing wrong with having a little fun, I suppose, although there surely are more attractive speculative bets out there. According to <a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/story/media/playboy-shocks-world-with-lower-losses-and-magazine-profits/19363647/"></a>, Playboy lost 83 cents per share in Q4. Last year at this time, there was a loss of $4.40 per share.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/02/18/playboy-still-not-pretty-enough-for-my-portfolio/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Playboy Still Not Pretty Enough for My Portfolio</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/02/18/playboy-still-not-pretty-enough-for-my-portfolio/">Playboy Still Not Pretty Enough for My Portfolio</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 18 Feb 2010 17:20:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.dailyfinance.com/story/media/playboy-shocks-world-with-lower-losses-and-magazine-profits/19363647/>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/02/18/playboy-still-not-pretty-enough-for-my-portfolio/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19364287/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/02/18/playboy-still-not-pretty-enough-for-my-portfolio/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>entertainment</category><category>featured</category><category>magazines</category><category>PLA</category><category>Playboy</category><category>publishing</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Steven Mallas]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 18 Feb 2010 17:20:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Ad pages at Conde Nast down nearly a third]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/12/ad-pages-at-conde-nast-down-nearly-a-third/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/12/ad-pages-at-conde-nast-down-nearly-a-third/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/12/ad-pages-at-conde-nast-down-nearly-a-third/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/twx/" rel="tag">Time Warner (TWX)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/nyt/" rel="tag">New York Times'A' (NYT)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/media-world/" rel="tag">Media World</a></p><p><img border="1" hspace="4" alt="" vspace="4" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2009/11/condenastlogo.jpg" />The broader economy is showing signs that we can at least interpret as positive, but this doesn't extend to the media industry, it seems. Cond&eacute; Nast's ad page results are out for its 2009 issues, now that the last issue of the year has been sold for each of them ... <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2009/11/12/business/media/12mag.html" target="_blank">and the situation is grim</a>. </p>
<p>Cond&eacute; Nast lost 8,359 ad pages this year, according to a report released on Wednesday. Ad pages have plunged 30% this year. Cost cutting has been used to offset the revenue declines, with more than 450 positions removed this year and several magazines shuttered, including <em>Gourmet</em> and <em>Modern Bride</em>.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/12/ad-pages-at-conde-nast-down-nearly-a-third/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Ad pages at Conde Nast down nearly a third</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/12/ad-pages-at-conde-nast-down-nearly-a-third/">Ad pages at Conde Nast down nearly a third</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 12 Nov 2009 12:40:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/12/ad-pages-at-conde-nast-down-nearly-a-third/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19234682/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/12/ad-pages-at-conde-nast-down-nearly-a-third/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>bride</category><category>Conde Nast</category><category>Conde Nast Traveler</category><category>details</category><category>glamour magazine</category><category>gourmet</category><category>graydon carter</category><category>hearst</category><category>inthenews</category><category>magazines</category><category>modern bride</category><category>new york times</category><category>nyt</category><category>print magazines</category><category>print media</category><category>publishing</category><category>time warner</category><category>twx</category><category>vanity fair</category><category>w magazine</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tom Johansmeyer]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 12 Nov 2009 12:40:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Time Warner tops expectations in the third quarter]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/04/time-warner-tops-expectations-in-the-third-quarter/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/04/time-warner-tops-expectations-in-the-third-quarter/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/04/time-warner-tops-expectations-in-the-third-quarter/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/earnings-reports/" rel="tag">Earnings Reports</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/twx/" rel="tag">Time Warner (TWX)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/aol/" rel="tag">AOL (AOL)</a></p><img hspace="4" height="87" width="160" vspace="4" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2009/09/time-warner-media-logo-design.jpg" alt="" />Media giant <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/time-warner-inc/twx/nys">Time Warner</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/time-warner-inc/twx/nys">TWX</a>) reported third-quarter earnings this morning and issued a stronger outlook. During the quarter, <a href="http://news.aol.com/article/time-warner-3q-profit-drops-boosts/593640">earnings dropped 38%</a>, thanks to declines at its AOL division (parent of BloggingStocks) and publishing segments. <br />
<br />
Excluding items, TWX's earnings checked in at 61 cents per share, topping the consensus estimate by 8 cents per share. Quarterly revenue slipped 6% to $7.1 billion, matching the consensus estimate. Looking ahead, TWX forecast adjusted earnings of at least $2.05 per share. This forecast is higher than the $1.98 per share the company issued earlier and the $2.02 per share that the Street expects.<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/04/time-warner-tops-expectations-in-the-third-quarter/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Time Warner tops expectations in the third quarter</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/04/time-warner-tops-expectations-in-the-third-quarter/">Time Warner tops expectations in the third quarter</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 04 Nov 2009 11:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/04/time-warner-tops-expectations-in-the-third-quarter/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19222713/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/04/time-warner-tops-expectations-in-the-third-quarter/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>AOL</category><category>inthenews</category><category>media</category><category>publishing</category><category>quarterly earnings</category><category>QuarterlyEarnings</category><category>Time Warner</category><category>TimeWarner</category><category>twx</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark Fightmaster]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 11:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Time Warner to sell magazine unit 'eventually']]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/27/time-warner-to-sell-magazine-unit-eventually/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/27/time-warner-to-sell-magazine-unit-eventually/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/27/time-warner-to-sell-magazine-unit-eventually/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/magazines/" rel="tag">Magazines</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/competitive-strategy/" rel="tag">Competitive Strategy</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/twx/" rel="tag">Time Warner (TWX)</a></p><p><img border="1" hspace="4" alt="" vspace="4" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2009/09/time-warner-media-logo-design.jpg" width="160" height="87" />Eventually, <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/time-warner-inc-new/twx/nys" target="_blank">Time Warner</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/time-warner-inc-new/twx/nys" target="_blank">TWX</a>) will just be <a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/ousivMolt/idUSTRE58P1JK20090926" target="_blank">Warner Brothers, HBO, and Turner Networks</a>, says Gordon Crawford, managing director of The Capital Group. </p>
<p>Why does this guy's opinion matter? Well, his company is Time Warner's biggest shareholder. He sees the coming divestiture of <a href="http://www.aol.com" target="_blank">AOL</a> (to which <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com" target="_blank">BloggingStocks</a> belongs) as part of a broader effort that will eventually include the sale of its print division.</p>
<p> </p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/27/time-warner-to-sell-magazine-unit-eventually/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Time Warner to sell magazine unit 'eventually'</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/27/time-warner-to-sell-magazine-unit-eventually/">Time Warner to sell magazine unit 'eventually'</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Sun, 27 Sep 2009 11:40:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/27/time-warner-to-sell-magazine-unit-eventually/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19175280/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/27/time-warner-to-sell-magazine-unit-eventually/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>america online</category><category>aol</category><category>inthenews</category><category>magazine industry</category><category>print magazines</category><category>print media</category><category>publishing</category><category>time inc</category><category>time warner</category><category>TimeWarner</category><category>twx</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tom Johansmeyer]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 27 Sep 2009 11:40:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Scholastic's Q1 doesn't cast magic spell -- or does it?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/25/scholastics-q1-doesnt-cast-magic-spell-or-does-it/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/25/scholastics-q1-doesnt-cast-magic-spell-or-does-it/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/25/scholastics-q1-doesnt-cast-magic-spell-or-does-it/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/earnings-reports/" rel="tag">Earnings Reports</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/mhp/" rel="tag">McGraw-Hill Companies (MHP)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/media-world/" rel="tag">Media World</a></p><p><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/scholastic-corporation/schl/nas"><img border="1" hspace="4" alt="" vspace="4" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/11/tyranny_of_goals.jpg" /></a><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/scholastic-corporation/schl/nas">Scholastic</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/scholastic-corporation/schl/nas">SCHL</a>), the publisher of the <em>Harry Potter</em> books, issued its <a href="http://money.aol.com/rtn/pr/scholastic-reports-first-quarter-results-for-fiscal-2010/rfid254243154?channel=pf">first-quarter numbers</a> on Thursday. Although things do seem to be improving, I can't say I was wholly enchanted by the data.</p>
<p>Net sales from continuing operations rose 14%. Okay, that's a good start. Double-digit rises are always respectable. But then we get to the bottom line. Scholastic, which is a related business to <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/mcgraw-hill-companies-incorporat/mhp/nys">McGraw-Hill</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/mcgraw-hill-companies-incorporat/mhp/nys">MHP</a>), lost 68 cents per share from continuing operations. Now, sure, the loss was considerably less severe than the year-ago black ink of $1.13 per share. But I always get nervous when I read about losses. Can't help it.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/25/scholastics-q1-doesnt-cast-magic-spell-or-does-it/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Scholastic's Q1 doesn't cast magic spell -- or does it?</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/25/scholastics-q1-doesnt-cast-magic-spell-or-does-it/">Scholastic's Q1 doesn't cast magic spell -- or does it?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 25 Sep 2009 15:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/25/scholastics-q1-doesnt-cast-magic-spell-or-does-it/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19174253/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/25/scholastics-q1-doesnt-cast-magic-spell-or-does-it/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>books</category><category>educational</category><category>Harry Potter</category><category>inthenews</category><category>mcgraw-hill</category><category>MHP</category><category>publishing</category><category>SCHL</category><category>Scholastic</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Steven Mallas]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 25 Sep 2009 15:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reader's Digest: Another botched private equity deal]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/08/17/readers-digest-another-botched-private-equity-deal/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/08/17/readers-digest-another-botched-private-equity-deal/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/08/17/readers-digest-another-botched-private-equity-deal/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/ge/" rel="tag">General Electric (GE)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/privateequity/" rel="tag">Private Equity</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/jpm/" rel="tag">JPMorgan Chase (JPM)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/bac/" rel="tag">Bank of America (BAC)</a></p><p><img border="1" hspace="4" alt="" vspace="4" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2009/08/rd.jpg" width="152" height="68" />It seems that no print publication is immune from the wrenching changes in the publishing industry. Look at <a href="http://www.rd.com">Reader's Digest</a>. The company said it will likely <a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/industryNews/idUSTRE57G37B20090817">file</a> for a so-called prearranged Chapter 11 bankruptcy.</p>
<p>The main reason: to pare down the heavy debt load.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/08/17/readers-digest-another-botched-private-equity-deal/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Reader's Digest: Another botched private equity deal</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/08/17/readers-digest-another-botched-private-equity-deal/">Reader's Digest: Another botched private equity deal</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 17 Aug 2009 12:40:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/08/17/readers-digest-another-botched-private-equity-deal/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19131455/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/08/17/readers-digest-another-botched-private-equity-deal/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>BAC</category><category>Bank of America</category><category>bankruptcy</category><category>GE Capital</category><category>inthenews</category><category>JPM</category><category>JPMorgan</category><category>publishing</category><category>Readers Digest</category><category>Ripplewood Holdings</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tom Taulli]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 17 Aug 2009 12:40:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Playboy's second quarter: Not centerfold material ]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/08/05/playboys-second-quarter-not-centerfold-material/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/08/05/playboys-second-quarter-not-centerfold-material/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/08/05/playboys-second-quarter-not-centerfold-material/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/earnings-reports/" rel="tag">Earnings Reports</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/magazines/" rel="tag">Magazines</a></p><p><img border="1" hspace="4" vspace="4" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/10/playboy-pla-logo.jpg" alt="" /><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/playboy-enterprises-inc/pla/nys">Playboy Enterprises</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/playboy-enterprises-inc/pla/nys">PLA</a>) is still around? I was surprised to hear that it was, according to a news article from Reuters detailing the <a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/earningsSeason/idUSN047443620090804">struggling media company</a>'s second-quarter results. Unfortunately, Playboy remains a puzzle. How in the world is management going to turn the ship around? </p>
<p>Playboy's top line fell by 15%. The bottom line booked a loss of 26 cents per share. Expectations were for 23 cents per share to be lost. In the year-ago period, Playboy lost 10 cents per share. I think it's plainly obvious that Playboy just isn't the force it once was. Pretty sad to see this icon slowly fade into irrelevance as the digital revolution continues to devalue its historic brand equity. </p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/08/05/playboys-second-quarter-not-centerfold-material/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Playboy's second quarter: Not centerfold material </em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/08/05/playboys-second-quarter-not-centerfold-material/">Playboy's second quarter: Not centerfold material </a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 05 Aug 2009 13:30:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.reuters.com/article/earningsSeason/idUSN047443620090804>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href=http://money.aol.com/rtn/pr/playboy-enterprises-inc-reports-second-quarter-2009-results/rfid238374061?channel=pf>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href=http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/20/playboy-pla-speculative-bet-on-the-bunny/>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/08/05/playboys-second-quarter-not-centerfold-material/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19119440/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/08/05/playboys-second-quarter-not-centerfold-material/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>inthenews</category><category>magazine</category><category>PLA</category><category>Playboy</category><category>publishing</category><category>steven halpern</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Steven Mallas]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 05 Aug 2009 13:30:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Does Kindle make Amazon a good investment idea?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/06/12/does-kindle-make-amazon-a-good-investment-idea/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/06/12/does-kindle-make-amazon-a-good-investment-idea/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/06/12/does-kindle-make-amazon-a-good-investment-idea/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/goog/" rel="tag">Google (GOOG)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/amzn/" rel="tag">Amazon.com (AMZN)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/sne/" rel="tag">Sony Corp ADR (SNE)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/technology/" rel="tag">Technology</a></p><p><img border="1" hspace="4" alt="" vspace="4" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2009/02/amzn-kindle.jpg" />There's been some news on the <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/amazon-com-inc/amzn/nas">Amazon</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/amazon-com-inc/amzn/nas">AMZN</a>) Kindle, the company's electronic substitute for real paper books. According to this <a href="http://www.smartmoney.com/breaking-news/on/?story=ON-20090610-000692-1424">source</a>, everything is coming along fine for the product from a statistical point of view. An estimate of Kindle sales from Citigroup Global Markets puts the number of units sold last year at 500,000. By 2010, it's said that the Kindle may lead to $1.2 billion of derivative sales. I was surprised to learn that this sales number would possibly represent 4% of Amazon's top line. </p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/06/12/does-kindle-make-amazon-a-good-investment-idea/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Does Kindle make Amazon a good investment idea?</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/06/12/does-kindle-make-amazon-a-good-investment-idea/">Does Kindle make Amazon a good investment idea?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 12 Jun 2009 15:40:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/06/12/does-kindle-make-amazon-a-good-investment-idea/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19065872/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/06/12/does-kindle-make-amazon-a-good-investment-idea/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Amazon</category><category>AMZN</category><category>book</category><category>Citigroup Global Markets</category><category>ebook</category><category>featured</category><category>GOOG</category><category>Google</category><category>Jeff Bezos</category><category>Kindle</category><category>publishing</category><category>SNE</category><category>Sony</category><category>tom taulli</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Steven Mallas]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 12 Jun 2009 15:40:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Playboy's Q1 needs to be airbrushed]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/05/11/playboys-q1-needs-to-be-airbrushed/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/05/11/playboys-q1-needs-to-be-airbrushed/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/05/11/playboys-q1-needs-to-be-airbrushed/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/earnings-reports/" rel="tag">Earnings Reports</a></p><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/playboy-enterprises-inc/pla/nys"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/10/playboy-pla-logo.jpg" alt="" /></a><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/playboy-enterprises-inc/pla/nys">Playboy</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/playboy-enterprises-inc/pla/nys">PLA</a>) published its <a href="http://money.aol.com/news/articles/qp/pr/_a/playboy-enterprises-inc-reports-first/rfid212401172">Q1 results</a> today. Any longtime follower of the company will note that things haven't changed. We're still talking about revenue declines and losses. When will the Bunny finally hop back into reliable profitability? No one really knows when (if) that will happen.
<p> </p>
<p>On a reported basis, Playboy said it lost $0.41 per share. If you strip out charges, you get a loss of $0.15 per share. This number was a few cents better than the expectations of analysts according to this <a href="http://www.earnings.com/company.asp?client=cb&amp;ticker=pla">source</a>. Be that as it may, they certainly don't meet <em>my</em> expectations. The adjusted loss is essentially the same as last year's number. I suppose we have to give the interim CEO Jerome Kern a chance. As you'll recall, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/12/08/christie-hefners-reign-of-terror-comes-to-an-end/">Christie Hefner</a> finally gave up her throne earlier in the year (thankfully). </p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/05/11/playboys-q1-needs-to-be-airbrushed/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Playboy's Q1 needs to be airbrushed</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/05/11/playboys-q1-needs-to-be-airbrushed/">Playboy's Q1 needs to be airbrushed</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 11 May 2009 15:10:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.earnings.com/company.asp?client=cb&amp;ticker=pla>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href=http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/12/08/christie-hefners-reign-of-terror-comes-to-an-end/>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href=http://money.aol.com/news/articles/qp/pr/_a/playboy-enterprises-inc-reports-first/rfid212401172>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/05/11/playboys-q1-needs-to-be-airbrushed/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1542695/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/05/11/playboys-q1-needs-to-be-airbrushed/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Christie Hefner</category><category>ChristieHefner</category><category>hugh hefner</category><category>HughHefner</category><category>inthenews</category><category>jerome kern</category><category>JeromeKern</category><category>magazines</category><category>PLA</category><category>Playboy</category><category>publishing</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Steven Mallas]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 11 May 2009 15:10:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Adobe (ADBE) first quarter earnings preview]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/17/adobe-adbe-first-quarter-earnings-preview/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/17/adobe-adbe-first-quarter-earnings-preview/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/17/adobe-adbe-first-quarter-earnings-preview/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/earnings-reports/" rel="tag">Earnings Reports</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/analyst-upgrades-and-downgrades/" rel="tag">Analyst Upgrades and Downgrades</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/forecasts/" rel="tag">Forecasts</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/products-and-services/" rel="tag">Products and Services</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/adbe/" rel="tag">Adobe Systems (ADBE)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/recession/" rel="tag">Recession</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/financial-crisis/" rel="tag">Financial Crisis</a></p><img hspace="4" border="0" align="right" vspace="4" alt="Adbobe first quarter earnings preview" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/09/adobe-adbe-logo.jpg" /><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/adobe-systems-incorporated/adbe/nas">Adobe Systems</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/adobe-systems-incorporated/adbe/nas">ADBE</a>) will get its chance to impress investors this afternoon when it reports its first quarter numbers following the market close.<br /><br />Going into this afternoon's earnings release, the company is expected to show earnings of <a href="http://earnings.com/company.asp?ticker=ADBE&amp;coid=110578&amp;client=cb">44 cents per share</a> for its quarter ending February 27. For the same period last year, the company reported that it had earned 48 cents per share, so we are looking at the company possibly seeing an 8.3% year over year earnings decline.<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/17/adobe-adbe-first-quarter-earnings-preview/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Adobe (ADBE) first quarter earnings preview</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/17/adobe-adbe-first-quarter-earnings-preview/">Adobe (ADBE) first quarter earnings preview</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 17 Mar 2009 13:30:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/17/adobe-adbe-first-quarter-earnings-preview/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1490579/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/17/adobe-adbe-first-quarter-earnings-preview/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Adobe</category><category>dreamweaver</category><category>earnings</category><category>earnings preview</category><category>earnings reports</category><category>EarningsPreview</category><category>EarningsReports</category><category>Flash</category><category>jefferies</category><category>Photoshop</category><category>publishing</category><category>stock upgrades</category><category>StockUpgrades</category><category>UBS</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Michael Fowlkes]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 17 Mar 2009 13:30:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Condoleezza Rice signs a three-book deal]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/25/condoleezza-rice-signs-a-three-book-deal/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/25/condoleezza-rice-signs-a-three-book-deal/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/25/condoleezza-rice-signs-a-three-book-deal/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/books/" rel="tag">Books</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/politics/" rel="tag">Politics</a></p><p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2009/02/225px-condoleezza_rice_cropped.jpg" />The publishing industry might be in the toilet, but former Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice is doing just fine.</p>
<p>The Associated Press reports that the former Secretary of State <a href="http://www.google.com/hostednews/ap/article/ALeqM5jVZwVgovtbtgjLcdI1PjjCYyl1TwD96GTSUG0">Condoleezza Rice has signed a three-book deal</a> with Crown Publishers that guarantees her at least $2.5 million. The first book will be a memoir of her years in the Bush Administration, followed by a book about her family, followed by a young-adult version of her life story.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/25/condoleezza-rice-signs-a-three-book-deal/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Condoleezza Rice signs a three-book deal</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/25/condoleezza-rice-signs-a-three-book-deal/">Condoleezza Rice signs a three-book deal</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 25 Feb 2009 17:50:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/25/condoleezza-rice-signs-a-three-book-deal/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1468601/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/25/condoleezza-rice-signs-a-three-book-deal/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Books</category><category>Condoleezza Rice</category><category>Crown</category><category>Publishing</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Zac Bissonnette]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 25 Feb 2009 17:50:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Long term investments: The (bright) future of publishing]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/19/long-term-investments-the-bright-future-of-publishing/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/19/long-term-investments-the-bright-future-of-publishing/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/19/long-term-investments-the-bright-future-of-publishing/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/amzn/" rel="tag">Amazon.com (AMZN)</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2009/02/amzn-kindle.jpg" alt="" />It can be hard to tell the difference between a revolution and a fad, or a game-changing innovation and the latest toy. With that in mind, it isn't surprising that so many people have failed to recognize <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/amazon-com-inc/amzn/nas">Amazon</a>'s (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/amazon-com-inc/amzn/nas">AMZN</a>) Kindle for what it truly is: the first bold step in what will likely become the salvation of publishing. <br /><br />Frankly, it's easy to overlook the Kindle. At more than $300, it is prohibitively <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/09/is-the-amazon-amzn-kindle-a-toy-or-the-companys-future/">expensive</a> for many consumers in today's market; further, as <em>Bloggingstocks </em>columnist Joseph Lazzaro <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/12/29/are-books-doomed/">notes</a>, there is nothing quite like curling up with a nice book, and the current Kindle doesn't quite make the grade. The little reader suffers from a too-small screen, a too-high price tag, and is an insufficient translator of the holistic "reading experience" that true bibliophiles adore.<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/19/long-term-investments-the-bright-future-of-publishing/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Long term investments: The (bright) future of publishing</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/19/long-term-investments-the-bright-future-of-publishing/">Long term investments: The (bright) future of publishing</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 19 Feb 2009 16:35:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/19/long-term-investments-the-bright-future-of-publishing/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1465817/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/19/long-term-investments-the-bright-future-of-publishing/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>amazon</category><category>books</category><category>kindle</category><category>publishing</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Bruce Watson]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 19 Feb 2009 16:35:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Can Pooh pull publishing out of the crapper?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/10/can-pooh-pull-publishing-out-of-the-crapper/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/10/can-pooh-pull-publishing-out-of-the-crapper/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/10/can-pooh-pull-publishing-out-of-the-crapper/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/books/" rel="tag">Books</a></p><p><img height="172" alt="" hspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2009/01/winnie-logo.gif" width="187" align="right" vspace="4" />The first authorized sequel to A.A. Milne's beloved Winnie the Pooh series will make its debut this year. David Benedictus's "Return to the Hundred Acre Wood" will be in stores on October 5. Dutton Children's Books is the publisher, and executive Don Weisberg says the book will be a "huge seller for a long, long time."</p>
<p>To its credit, Milne's estate has carefully guarded the character -- they could have easily cashed in for millions years ago by authorizing sequel after sequel. That Mr. Benedictus was finally the one who convinced them would seem to suggest that the book will be quite good.</p>
<p><a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB123151851400268315.html?mod=todays_us_weekend_journalhttp://online.wsj.com/article/SB123151851400268315.html?mod=todays_us_weekend_journal">According to <em>The Wall Street Journal</em></a> (subscription required), "The troubled book industry, in need of titles that will pull readers into the stores, will get a much-needed jolt" from the title.</p>
<p>I somehow doubt that Winnie will be a big enough hit to provide much relief to booksellers. But he's a hard guy not to root for.</p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/10/can-pooh-pull-publishing-out-of-the-crapper/">Can Pooh pull publishing out of the crapper?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Sat, 10 Jan 2009 16:40:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://online.wsj.com/article/SB123151851400268315.html?mod=todays_us_weekend_journalhttp://online.wsj.com/article/SB123151851400268315.html?mod=todays_us_weekend_journal>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/10/can-pooh-pull-publishing-out-of-the-crapper/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1425384/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/10/can-pooh-pull-publishing-out-of-the-crapper/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Books</category><category>Publishing</category><category>Winnie the Pooh</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Zac Bissonnette]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 10 Jan 2009 16:40:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Money winners of 2008: Sarah Palin, coming to a book store near you]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/12/13/money-winners-of-2008-sarah-palin-coming-to-a-book-store-near/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/12/13/money-winners-of-2008-sarah-palin-coming-to-a-book-store-near/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/12/13/money-winners-of-2008-sarah-palin-coming-to-a-book-store-near/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/marketing-and-advertising/" rel="tag">Marketing and Advertising</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/books/" rel="tag">Books</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/politics/" rel="tag">Politics</a></p><p><em><img alt="" hspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/12/blog-money-winners-sarah-palin-200x267.jpg" align="right" vspace="4" border="1" />This post is part of our feature on <strong><a href="http://www.walletpop.com/specials/money-winners">Money Winners of 2008</a></strong>. See all 20.</em></p>
<p>They called her <a href="http://www.cariboubarbie.com/">Caribou Barbie</a>. <em>Saturday Night Live</em> lampooned her mercilessly during the presidential election. The media elite denounced her as an idiot and a right-wing loony tune. But Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin is not going to fade into the snow of the beautiful state she governs. In fact, she is coming to a book store near you.<br /><br />Media reports indicate that the former vice presidential nominee is<a href="http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/27755392/"> expected to earn $7 million </a>to tell her life story to a ghost writer. That's not too shabby considering that former president Bill Clinton got about $11 million for his life story and he actually was the leader of the free world. Barack Obama and his former rival John McCain both have earned big money from their books, so why shouldn't Palin.<br /><br />There was also some talk during the campaign about a talk show or reality show starring the woman responsible for giving Tina Fey's career a boost -- as if it really needed one -- <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2008/10/25/236com-name-sarah-palins_n_137813.html">but that seems to have gone nowhere</a>.<br /><br />Palin, though, will have the last laugh on her naysayers, including me. During her brief time in the spotlight, Palin transformed herself from an obscure politician to a cultural icon. Along the way, she infuriated many voters and charmed more than a few. The power of Palin's celebrity will entice people who may not agree with her politically to buy her book. Her devoted fans will line up at the bookstores to buy it as well. Palin's tome has the makings of a best-seller.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/12/13/money-winners-of-2008-sarah-palin-coming-to-a-book-store-near/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Money winners of 2008: Sarah Palin, coming to a book store near you</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/12/13/money-winners-of-2008-sarah-palin-coming-to-a-book-store-near/">Money winners of 2008: Sarah Palin, coming to a book store near you</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Sat, 13 Dec 2008 15:40:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/12/13/money-winners-of-2008-sarah-palin-coming-to-a-book-store-near/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1393985/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/12/13/money-winners-of-2008-sarah-palin-coming-to-a-book-store-near/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Alaska governor</category><category>barack obama</category><category>books</category><category>Caribou Barbie</category><category>featured</category><category>GOP</category><category>john mccain</category><category>Money Winners 2008</category><category>publishing</category><category>sarah palin</category><category>Tina Fey</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jonathan Berr]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 13 Dec 2008 15:40:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Booksellers hope people read even during a recession (BKS, AMZN, BGP)]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/12/do-people-want-to-read-books-during-a-recession/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/12/do-people-want-to-read-books-during-a-recession/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/12/do-people-want-to-read-books-during-a-recession/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/consumer-experience/" rel="tag">Consumer Experience</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/wmt/" rel="tag">Wal-Mart (WMT)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/amzn/" rel="tag">Amazon.com (AMZN)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/dis/" rel="tag">Walt Disney (DIS)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/bby/" rel="tag">Best Buy (BBY)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/atvi/" rel="tag">Activision Inc (ATVI)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/books/" rel="tag">Books</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/recession/" rel="tag">Recession</a></p><p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/08/harry_potter.jpg" alt="" />So, how will booksellers such as <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/barnes-and-noble-inc/bks/nys">Barnes &amp; Noble</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/barnes-and-noble-inc/bks/nys">BKS</a>), <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/borders-group-inc/bgp/nys">Borders Group</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/borders-group-inc/bgp/nys">BGP</a>), and <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/amazon-com-inc/amzn/nas">Amazon</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/amazon-com-inc/amzn/nas">AMZN</a>) fare during the holiday season? It's an interesting question, one which is examined in an article at <em><a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2008/11/11/books/11book.html?_r=1&amp;oref=slogin&amp;ref=business&amp;pagewanted=all">The New York Times</a></em>. The piece talks about how the current recession seems to be affecting consumers and their desire to buy books. At the beginning of the article, two shoppers are browsing in a bookstore -- one buys, the other doesn't. Both have been affected by the bad economy. What are we to make of this?</p>
<p>I'll give you my take on things. Books, unfortunately, are simply not so glamorous these days. And I do think that booksellers are going to have a hard time this holiday season. With all the competition from video games and other media, the printed page just isn't that exciting to a lot of consumers. I don't think that books will be a top priority as the wallet continues to get squeezed and while job security remains an issue. Our attention spans have been cut so short these days, and they're only getting shorter. In an era of MTV quick-edits and PowerPoint presentations, 100,000-word diversions don't feel so diverting anymore.</p>
<p> Books are probably even less exciting to young people. Seriously, how many kids have books on their Christmas lists this year? They may want the latest Blu-ray cartoon from <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/the-walt-disney-company/dis/nys">Disney</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/the-walt-disney-company/dis/nys">DIS</a>), or the latest <em>Call of Duty</em> game from <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/activision-blizzard-inc/atvi/nas">Activision Blizzard</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/activision-blizzard-inc/atvi/nas">ATVI</a>), but I'm not so sure they want the latest Stephen King novel (as for me, I picked up King's latest short-story collection <em>Just After Sunset</em> at my local Barnes &amp; Noble). Many kids have been introduced to the joys of reading through the Harry Potter series, but I don't think Potter will be working his magic this season. If parents do cut back this year on presents, I figure they're going to err on the side of making sure that all the non-book gifts are acquired.</p>
<p>Is there anything the booksellers can do about this?</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/12/do-people-want-to-read-books-during-a-recession/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Booksellers hope people read even during a recession (BKS, AMZN, BGP)</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/12/do-people-want-to-read-books-during-a-recession/">Booksellers hope people read even during a recession (BKS, AMZN, BGP)</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 12 Nov 2008 14:35:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.nytimes.com/2008/11/11/books/11book.html?_r=1&amp;oref=slogin&amp;ref=business&amp;pagewanted=all>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/12/do-people-want-to-read-books-during-a-recession/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1369378/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/12/do-people-want-to-read-books-during-a-recession/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>activision blizzard</category><category>ActivisionBlizzard</category><category>amazon</category><category>AMZN</category><category>ATVI</category><category>barnes and noble</category><category>BarnesAndNoble</category><category>BBY</category><category>Best Buy</category><category>BestBuy</category><category>BGP</category><category>BKS</category><category>books</category><category>borders group</category><category>BordersGroup</category><category>call of duty</category><category>CallOfDuty</category><category>DIS</category><category>Disney</category><category>harry potter</category><category>HarryPotter</category><category>inthenews</category><category>publishing</category><category>Stephen King</category><category>StephenKing</category><category>Wal-Mart</category><category>WMT</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Steven Mallas]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 12 Nov 2008 14:35:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Barnes &amp; Noble is not dead yet]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/08/22/barnes-and-noble-is-not-dead-yet/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/08/22/barnes-and-noble-is-not-dead-yet/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/08/22/barnes-and-noble-is-not-dead-yet/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/earnings-reports/" rel="tag">Earnings Reports</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/forecasts/" rel="tag">Forecasts</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/amzn/" rel="tag">Amazon.com (AMZN)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/books/" rel="tag">Books</a></p><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/barnes-and-noble-inc/bks/nys">Barnes &amp; Noble Inc.</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/barnes-and-noble-inc/bks/nys">BKS</a>) surprised Wall Street today by<a href="http://www.barnesandnobleinc.com/press_releases/2008_aug_21_second_quarter_earnings.html"> reporting quarterly earnings</a> that did not suck as bad analysts expected, mainly because it was able to control costs. The question is whether this is sustainable.<br /><br />Net income at the world's largest bookseller fell to $15.4 million, or 27 cents a share, from $18.05 million, or 26 cents, a year earlier. Sales dropped 1.6% to $1.2 billion from a year earlier when J.K. Rowling's <em>Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows</em> was flying off the shelves. Barnes &amp; Noble store sales decreased 1.6% to $1.1 billion, with comparable store sales decreasing 4.7%. Barnes &amp; Noble.com sales rose 3.6% to $99.8 million.<br /><br />Excluding a one-time tax benefit, profit was 15 cents, five cents ahead of the 10-cent average estimate of analysts surveyed by Bloomberg. It was also higher than the company's guidance of 8 cents to 13 cents a share. Gross margins were stronger because of the greater utilization rates of its distribution centers and a lower markdown rate. Selling and administrative expenses fell in the quarter.<br /><br />Of course, Barnes &amp; Noble will continue to struggle as consumers cut back on their discretionary purchases. Moreover, <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/amazon-com-inc/amzn/nas">Amazon.com Inc</a>. (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/amazon-com-inc/amzn/nas">AMZN</a>) is not going anywhere soon. The company expects to lose 10 to 15 cents in the third quarter. It also lowered its full-year comparable same store sales guidance from "slightly negative to a decrease in the low single digits." The company is maintaining its full-year earnings guidance of $1.70 to $1.90.<br /><br />At this rate, the company may be able to ride out the economic downturn until it can find a private equity buyer which is about the only hope for shareholders.<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/08/22/barnes-and-noble-is-not-dead-yet/">Barnes &amp; Noble is not dead yet</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 22 Aug 2008 16:50:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://online.wsj.com/article/SB121933357699860555.html?mod=rss_Earnings>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/08/22/barnes-and-noble-is-not-dead-yet/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1292582/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/08/22/barnes-and-noble-is-not-dead-yet/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>AMZN</category><category>barnes and noble</category><category>BarnesAndNoble</category><category>BKS</category><category>earningsn</category><category>inthenews</category><category>publishing</category><category>retail</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jonathan Berr]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 22 Aug 2008 16:50:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[All economics is local: Wall Street slump cuts New York City tax revenue]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/08/16/all-economics-is-local-wall-street-slump-cuts-new-york-city-tax/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/08/16/all-economics-is-local-wall-street-slump-cuts-new-york-city-tax/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/08/16/all-economics-is-local-wall-street-slump-cuts-new-york-city-tax/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/other-issues/" rel="tag">Other Issues</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/bad-news/" rel="tag">Bad News</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/politics/" rel="tag">Politics</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/recession/" rel="tag">Recession</a></p><p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/08/wall_street_-claude-max_lochu-publicdomain.jpg" />Want a classic example of how the real estate slump is affecting not only the construction industry and home owners, but also states and municipalities, as well?</p>
<p>Consider the plight of the nation's largest city, the <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/City_of_New_York">City of New York</a>.</p>
<p>Wall Street's mortgage losses have ballooned to such a degree that some firms <a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&amp;sid=aYhqIluVHh7U&amp;refer=home">may pay small or no taxes for years</a>, Bloomberg News reported. That's right: no taxes for years.</p>
<p><strong>Rising tax revenues, no more</strong></p>
<p>For much of the current decade, indeed for much of the 1990s as well, the city could count on rising tax revenue from Wall Street firms -- based on increased securities industry business -- as a starting point for the city's budget. Not now: the city, which derives about 20% of its revenue from Wall Street businesses, is projecting a decline in revenue from Wall Street firms -- a contraction that is expected to <a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&amp;sid=aYhqIluVHh7U&amp;refer=home">widen the this year's $1.5 budget deficit</a> in fiscal 2009 to $2.3 billion next year, fiscal 2010, and then to $5.96 billion in fiscal 2011 budget deficit, Bloomberg News reported. The city's budget for fiscal 2009 is $59.1 billion.</p>
<p>The Wall Street recession has put the social service goals of <a href="http://www.nyc.gov/portal/site/nycgov/menuitem.beb0d8fdaa9e1607a62fa24601c789a0/">Mayor Michael R. Bloomberg</a> on hold, for the most part. Bloomberg has already asked city department and agency heads to implement a 6.4% spending cut; he will likely ask department heads to identify other cost savings of up to 3%, should revenues continue to come in below projections.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/08/16/all-economics-is-local-wall-street-slump-cuts-new-york-city-tax/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>All economics is local: Wall Street slump cuts New York City tax revenue</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/08/16/all-economics-is-local-wall-street-slump-cuts-new-york-city-tax/">All economics is local: Wall Street slump cuts New York City tax revenue</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Sat, 16 Aug 2008 17:40:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/08/16/all-economics-is-local-wall-street-slump-cuts-new-york-city-tax/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1286372/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/08/16/all-economics-is-local-wall-street-slump-cuts-new-york-city-tax/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>advertising sector</category><category>Bloomberg</category><category>brokerage</category><category>City of New York</category><category>finance</category><category>housing sector</category><category>investment banks</category><category>media sector</category><category>Mike Bloomberg</category><category>municipal spending</category><category>publishing</category><category>real estate</category><category>securities industry</category><category>State of New York</category><category>taxes</category><category>Wall Street</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Joseph Lazzaro]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 16 Aug 2008 17:40:00 EST</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
