<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd">
<channel>
<title>BloggingStocks</title>
<link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com</link>
<description>BloggingStocks</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[DuPont Purchasing Danish Firm Danisco]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2011/01/10/dupont-purchasing-danish-firm-danisco/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2011/01/10/dupont-purchasing-danish-firm-danisco/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2011/01/10/dupont-purchasing-danish-firm-danisco/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/deals/" rel="tag">Deals</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/dd/" rel="tag">duPont(E.I.)deNemours (DD)</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2010/10/dupontlogo.jpg"  alt="" />Late yesterday, DuPont (<a target="_blank" href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/e-i-du-pont-de-nemours-and-company/dd/nys">DD</a>) announced that it will <a target="_blank" href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/article/dupont-to-purchase-danisco-for-58/1501576/">purchase Danish food-ingredient producer Danisco for $5.8 billion</a>. The company is making this move in order to expand both its foods and biofuels operations. Along with the $5.8 billion, DD will assume $500 million in debt. These companies are not strangers, as Danisco is already a joint venture partner of DD in the development of cellulosic ethanol technology. The Dutch company is expected to recommend that its shareholders accept the deal. <br />
<br />
<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2011/01/10/dupont-purchasing-danish-firm-danisco/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>DuPont Purchasing Danish Firm Danisco</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2011/01/10/dupont-purchasing-danish-firm-danisco/">DuPont Purchasing Danish Firm Danisco</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 10 Jan 2011 14:30:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2011/01/10/dupont-purchasing-danish-firm-danisco/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19794667/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2011/01/10/dupont-purchasing-danish-firm-danisco/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>biofuels</category><category>Danisco</category><category>DD</category><category>DuPont</category><category>inthenews</category><category>purchase</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark Fightmaster]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 10 Jan 2011 14:30:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Jo-Ann Stores to Be Acquired by Leonard Green &amp; Partners]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/12/23/jo-ann-stores-to-be-acquired-by-leonard-green-and-partners/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/12/23/jo-ann-stores-to-be-acquired-by-leonard-green-and-partners/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/12/23/jo-ann-stores-to-be-acquired-by-leonard-green-and-partners/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/before-the-bell/" rel="tag">Before the Bell</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/deals/" rel="tag">Deals</a></p><p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.dailyfinance.com/media/2010/12/sewing.jpg" />Jo-Ann Stores (<a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/jo-ann-stores-inc/jas/nys" target="_blank">JAS</a>) announced that it has definitively agreed to be <a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/rtn/pr/jo-ann-stores-to-be-acquired-by-leonard-green-and-partners-l-p-for-61-00-per-share-in-cash/rfid398691570/?channel=pf" target="_blank">acquired by an affiliate of Leonard Green &amp; Partners</a>. The acquisition carries a total price tag of $1.6 billion, or $61 per share, which is a hefty 34% premium to Wednesday's close. The merger has been approved by JAS's board of directors after receiving a recommendation of a special committee that was made of independent directors. </p>
<p>JAS chairman and CEO Darrell Webb noted, "We are excited about the prospect of working with Leonard Green &amp; Partners as we further capitalize on opportunities to accelerate the expansion and upgrade of our stores and pursue market share gains. With the help of our talented and dedicated team, we will continue to offer our customers a superior shopping experience for all of their fabric and craft needs."</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/12/23/jo-ann-stores-to-be-acquired-by-leonard-green-and-partners/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Jo-Ann Stores to Be Acquired by Leonard Green &amp; Partners</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/12/23/jo-ann-stores-to-be-acquired-by-leonard-green-and-partners/">Jo-Ann Stores to Be Acquired by Leonard Green &amp; Partners</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 23 Dec 2010 10:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/12/23/jo-ann-stores-to-be-acquired-by-leonard-green-and-partners/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19775072/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/12/23/jo-ann-stores-to-be-acquired-by-leonard-green-and-partners/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>featured</category><category>inthenews</category><category>JAS</category><category>Jo-Ann Stores</category><category>Leonard Green</category><category>purchase</category><category>takeover</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark Fightmaster]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 23 Dec 2010 10:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Potash Turns Down BHP Billiton Takeover Offer]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/08/17/potash-turns-down-bhp-billiton-takeover-offer/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/08/17/potash-turns-down-bhp-billiton-takeover-offer/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/08/17/potash-turns-down-bhp-billiton-takeover-offer/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/bhp/" rel="tag">BHP Billiton Ltd ADR (BHP)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/pot/" rel="tag">Potash Corp. of Saskatchewan (POT)</a></p><img hspace="4" vspace="4" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2010/08/potash.jpg"  alt="" />Potash (<a target="_blank" href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/potash-corporation-of-saskatchewan-inc/pot/nys">POT</a>) has <a target="_blank" href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/story/stock-picks/potashcorp-rejects-bhp-billiton-offer-as-grossly-inadequate/19596495/">turned down a takeover offer</a> by BHP Billiton Limited (<a target="_blank" href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/bhp-billiton-limited/bhp/nys">BHP</a>). According to the Canadian giant, the deal was rejected because BHP's bid was "grossly inadequate." POT's board unanimously rejected BHP's offer of $130 per share in cash -- noting that the offer does not accurately reflect the value of POT's position in the industry, the value of planned expansions, and the value of POT's investments. The $130-per-share offer is a 16% premium over POT's Monday close of $112.15. <br />
<br />
It sure seems that BHP was trying to score a major takeover with a lowball offer. Unfortunately for BHP, POT noted that there is a turnaround taking place in the fertilizer sector and BHP was simply trying to take advantage of the company. <p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/08/17/potash-turns-down-bhp-billiton-takeover-offer/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Potash Turns Down BHP Billiton Takeover Offer</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/08/17/potash-turns-down-bhp-billiton-takeover-offer/">Potash Turns Down BHP Billiton Takeover Offer</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 17 Aug 2010 08:30:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/08/17/potash-turns-down-bhp-billiton-takeover-offer/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19596603/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/08/17/potash-turns-down-bhp-billiton-takeover-offer/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>featured</category><category>fertilizer</category><category>Potash</category><category>purchase</category><category>purchase offer</category><category>takeover</category><category>takeover offer</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark Fightmaster]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 17 Aug 2010 08:30:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Abbott Labs wishes upon a StarLIMS]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/15/abbott-labs-wishes-upon-a-starlims/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/15/abbott-labs-wishes-upon-a-starlims/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/15/abbott-labs-wishes-upon-a-starlims/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/deals/" rel="tag">Deals</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/abt/" rel="tag">Abbott Laboratories (ABT)</a></p><img  border="1" hspace="4" vspace="4" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2009/12/abbott_logo-200.gif" alt="" />Bright and early this morning, lab-technology innovator StarLIMS (<a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/starlims-technologies-ltd/lims/nas" target="_blank">LIMS</a>) announced that <a href="http://www.globes.co.il/serveen/globes/docview.asp?did=1000522537&amp;fid=942">it will be bought</a> by pharmaceutical firm Abbott Laboratories (<a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/abbott-laboratories/abt/nys" target="_blank">ABT</a>) for roughly $123 million. This purchase price reflects a per-share price tag of $14 for LIMS, which closed Monday's trading session near the $10 region. <br /><br />Needless to say, LIMS was the subject of heavy pre-market trading, which pushed the per-share price closer to the premium paid by ABT. According to the report, ABT will acquire all outstanding equity of LIMS, which currently has roughly $18 million cash in hand.<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/15/abbott-labs-wishes-upon-a-starlims/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Abbott Labs wishes upon a StarLIMS</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/15/abbott-labs-wishes-upon-a-starlims/">Abbott Labs wishes upon a StarLIMS</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 15 Dec 2009 10:40:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/15/abbott-labs-wishes-upon-a-starlims/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19281587/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/15/abbott-labs-wishes-upon-a-starlims/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>abbott laboratories</category><category>abt</category><category>inthenews</category><category>lims</category><category>pharmaceutical</category><category>pharmaceuticals</category><category>purchase</category><category>starlims</category><category>takeover</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark Fightmaster]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 15 Dec 2009 10:40:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Could Yahoo!, Rivals, and ESPN team up to take on Google?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/06/24/could-yahoo-rivals-and-espn-team-up-to-take-on-google/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/06/24/could-yahoo-rivals-and-espn-team-up-to-take-on-google/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/06/24/could-yahoo-rivals-and-espn-team-up-to-take-on-google/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/deals/" rel="tag">Deals</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/rumors/" rel="tag">Rumors</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/competitive-strategy/" rel="tag">Competitive Strategy</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/goog/" rel="tag">Google (GOOG)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/yhoo/" rel="tag">Yahoo! (YHOO)</a></p><p>Here it is, right in front of you, <a href="http://today.reuters.com/news/articlenews.aspx?type=technologyNews&amp;storyid=2007-06-21T143404Z_01_N20311282_RTRUKOC_0_US-YAHOO-SPORTS.xml&amp;src=nl_ustechnology">the opportunity of a lifetime</a> for <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/yahoo-inc/yhoo/nas">Yahoo! Inc.</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/yahoo-inc/yhoo/nas">YHOO</a>). With the Rivals.com deal now in hand, making Yahoo a larger internet sports media interest than ESPN, the iron is hot and ready to strike a working partnership between Yahoo! and ESPN. If the two entities can hammer something out that makes full use of each companies strengths, we would most probably witness the birth of an internet sports composite that <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/google-inc-cl-a/goog/nas">Google</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/google-inc-cl-a/goog/nas">GOOG</a>) couldn't touch. Wouldn't it be nice to see Yahoo! as the <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/06/19/yahoos-handling-of-financial-blogs-says-it-all/">undeniable leader in something</a>? Admit it to yourself, Yahoo! deserves it.</p>
<p>I have no idea if there have been corporate discussions regarding such a working partnership, but you must consider that Yahoo! and ESPN are more than a little aware of each other, and if there's one thing that Yahoo! must be tired of right about now it would be the concept of vainly slugging it out with other large internet properties.</p>
<p>Let us watch carefully to see if some new strategies start seeping out of Yahoo! Perhaps Jerry Yang has secretly been <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/06/19/yahoo-wont-be-able-to-catch-google-even-with-a-new-ceo/">waiting for Terry Semel to be dislodged</a> before instigating some new ideas. If I held Yahoo! shares right now I'd be very hesitant to sell them, and I'd even consider adding a few. <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/06/19/yahoos-terry-semel-got-googled/">Yahoo! has been floundering</a>, but it is far from being counted out. I repeat my conviction that if Yahoo! will just just try to forget about Google and begin to cut it's own swath, it will do far better in the long run than by continuing to beat its head against the "Great Wall of Google."</p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/06/24/could-yahoo-rivals-and-espn-team-up-to-take-on-google/">Could Yahoo!, Rivals, and ESPN team up to take on Google?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Sun, 24 Jun 2007 09:10:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/06/24/could-yahoo-rivals-and-espn-team-up-to-take-on-google/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/923853/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/06/24/could-yahoo-rivals-and-espn-team-up-to-take-on-google/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>acquire</category><category>BloggingStocks</category><category>buy</category><category>ESPN</category><category>GOOG</category><category>Google</category><category>Jerry Yang</category><category>JerryYang</category><category>purchase</category><category>Rivals</category><category>Rivals.com</category><category>sports media</category><category>Terry Semel</category><category>Yahoo</category><category>YHOO</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Gary Sattler]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 24 Jun 2007 09:10:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Yahoo! to buy or Yahoo! to sell, that is the NEW question.]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/06/21/yahoo-to-buy-or-yahoo-to-sell-that-is-the-new-question/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/06/21/yahoo-to-buy-or-yahoo-to-sell-that-is-the-new-question/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/06/21/yahoo-to-buy-or-yahoo-to-sell-that-is-the-new-question/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/products-and-services/" rel="tag">Products and Services</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/internet/" rel="tag">Internet</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/rants-and-raves/" rel="tag">Rants and Raves</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/competitive-strategy/" rel="tag">Competitive Strategy</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/yhoo/" rel="tag">Yahoo! (YHOO)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/marketing-and-advertising/" rel="tag">Marketing and Advertising</a></p><p>Will <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/yahoo-inc/yhoo/nas">Yahoo!, Inc.</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/yahoo-inc/yhoo/nas">YHOO</a>) seek to acquire something or will Yahoo! look for a buyer for itself? Those are the two questions flying around . For me the answer is simple. At this time Yahoo! shouldn't be considering either move. Who needs to hear that <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/06/19/why-microsoft-should-buy-yahoo/">Microsoft has purchased Yahoo!</a>?</p>
<p>What Yahoo! needs right now is something <em>new.</em> Yahoo! needs a <em>new</em> direction. Yahoo! needs a <em>new </em>focus. Yahoo! needs <em>new</em> talent. Yahoo! needs to do <em>new </em>things. Did I mention <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/06/19/yahoo-wont-be-able-to-catch-google-even-with-a-new-ceo/">Yahoo! needs something new?</a></p>
<p>Here's one of my ideas: Yahoo should align with ESPN and reawaken the "First Person Sport Cam". Do you remember the failed helmet cam concept they tried in the NFL? It was an excellent idea but unless you're completely immune to motion sickness you can't stand to watch the action from that perspective for more than a couple minutes. There is a way to make it work however. If a GPS sensor was put on a player's helmet which then sent directional cues to camera arrays around the perimeter of the field of play, then the helmet would relay the players field of view and the static cameras could provide clear, stable pictures of exactly what that player is looking at. The Yahoo! Helmet Cam Sport Arena could be born. The concept could work on baseball caps and batting helmets. Sensors could be put in soccer players head bands. Tiger Woods could have one in his golf hat.<br /></p>
<p>The simple point to this blog post is that it's my opinion that now with <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/06/19/yahoos-terry-semel-got-googled/">Terry Semel moved aside</a> it's the time for Yahoo! to do something <em>drastically new</em>. They should continue to work the boring old search realm as long as the revenue justifies that, but indications are that the search advertising game is bracing for upheaval from video sharing interests. Web users are becoming more and more entrenched in where they like to go and what they like to do. The dynamics of Internet advertising are changing and it's time for something Yah-<em>new</em>!</p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/06/21/yahoo-to-buy-or-yahoo-to-sell-that-is-the-new-question/">Yahoo! to buy or Yahoo! to sell, that is the NEW question.</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 21 Jun 2007 19:28:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/06/21/yahoo-to-buy-or-yahoo-to-sell-that-is-the-new-question/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/922564/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/06/21/yahoo-to-buy-or-yahoo-to-sell-that-is-the-new-question/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>acquisition</category><category>buying</category><category>purchase</category><category>selling</category><category>sold</category><category>stock</category><category>Yahoo</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Gary Sattler]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 21 Jun 2007 19:28:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[eBay and StumbleUpon: The silence is deafening]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/06/19/ebay-and-stumbleupon-the-silence-is-deafening/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/06/19/ebay-and-stumbleupon-the-silence-is-deafening/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/06/19/ebay-and-stumbleupon-the-silence-is-deafening/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/deals/" rel="tag">Deals</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/products-and-services/" rel="tag">Products and Services</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/internet/" rel="tag">Internet</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/competitive-strategy/" rel="tag">Competitive Strategy</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/ebay/" rel="tag">eBay (EBAY)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/marketing-and-advertising/" rel="tag">Marketing and Advertising</a></p><p>If you were <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/ebay-inc/ebay/nas">eBay Inc.</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/ebay-inc/ebay/nas">EBAY</a>) you would have several good reasons for paying $75 million for StumbleUpon, right? I know that if I was eBay I myself would need significant justification for paying that amount of money for a social discovery site. Since May 30, 2007 when eBay announced that a deal had been reached for the purchase of StumbleUpon, more news from the company about that acquisition and any underlying reasons has been absent.</p>
<p>Everyone, from analysts to kids with frogs in their pockets, has been waiting for some manner of revelation regarding eBay's reason for buying StumbleUpon. Because there seem to be few concrete explanations about why this deal took place, I decided to throw my hat in. eBay bought bodies, that's it. <br /></p>
<p>eBay bought a user base of about 2.5 million users to augment its own membership numbers. StumbleUpon came into the deal with nothing to offer eBay beyond user names. Although StumbleUpon is quite a fun place, it has nothing which will breath new life into an auction site. If eBay had interesting plans or a measurable strategy to make use of StumbleUpon in any tangible way, it would be trumpeting those facts everywhere, but from where I sit the <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/search/?q=eBay%20StumbleUpon%20" />silence is deafening. </p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/06/19/ebay-and-stumbleupon-the-silence-is-deafening/">eBay and StumbleUpon: The silence is deafening</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 19 Jun 2007 18:32:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/06/19/ebay-and-stumbleupon-the-silence-is-deafening/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/919840/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/06/19/ebay-and-stumbleupon-the-silence-is-deafening/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>deal</category><category>eBay</category><category>links</category><category>purchase</category><category>StumbleUpon</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Gary Sattler]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 19 Jun 2007 18:32:00 EST</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
