<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd">
<channel>
<title>BloggingStocks</title>
<link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com</link>
<description>BloggingStocks</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[The Dow Rises, Falls, and Sometimes Meanders for a Long Time]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/06/02/the-dow-rises-falls-and-sometimes-meanders-for-a-long-time/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/06/02/the-dow-rises-falls-and-sometimes-meanders-for-a-long-time/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/06/02/the-dow-rises-falls-and-sometimes-meanders-for-a-long-time/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/indices/" rel="tag">Indices</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/djia/" rel="tag">DJIA</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/09/merrill_lynch_bull_robertoschmidt_afp_20070914.jpg"  alt="" />There are bull markets and bear markets, and while each often display a pattern that matches historical precedents, there are those 'irregular periods' that break the mold. Moreover, investors need to remain cognizant of that fact that an irregular period can be long. Very long. <br />
<br />
For example, consider the period beginning in the mid-1960s. The Dow crossed the 1,000 mark for the first time <a href="http:// http://stockcharts.com/charts/historical/djia1900.html">in January 1966</a>. President Lyndon B. Johnson (D-Texas) was in the White House then, and he was in the process of escalating the war in Vietnam. Inflation rose, due to ramping defense and social spending. The Dow soon dropped below 1,000.<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/06/02/the-dow-rises-falls-and-sometimes-meanders-for-a-long-time/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>The Dow Rises, Falls, and Sometimes Meanders for a Long Time</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/06/02/the-dow-rises-falls-and-sometimes-meanders-for-a-long-time/">The Dow Rises, Falls, and Sometimes Meanders for a Long Time</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 02 Jun 2010 17:30:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/06/02/the-dow-rises-falls-and-sometimes-meanders-for-a-long-time/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19500807/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/06/02/the-dow-rises-falls-and-sometimes-meanders-for-a-long-time/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>bear market</category><category>bull market</category><category>dow</category><category>rally</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Joseph Lazzaro]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 02 Jun 2010 17:30:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Inflation Level, Not Q1 Earnings, to Determine Rally's Fate]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/04/11/inflation-level-not-q1-earnings-to-determine-rallys-fate/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/04/11/inflation-level-not-q1-earnings-to-determine-rallys-fate/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/04/11/inflation-level-not-q1-earnings-to-determine-rallys-fate/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/forecasts/" rel="tag">Forecasts</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/indices/" rel="tag">Indices</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/djia/" rel="tag">DJIA</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/federal-reserve/" rel="tag">Federal Reserve</a></p><p><img  border="1" hspace="4" alt="Will the market rally continue?" vspace="4" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.dailyfinance.com/media/2009/12/traders_dec21_240.jpg" />With institutional bulls and bears engaged in a battle over <a href="http://clearstation.etrade.com/cgi-bin/details?Symbol=_INDU&amp;Section=front&amp;Refer=/index.html">Dow 11,000</a> and with market's bull run showing signs of getting a little long in the tooth, investors are legitimately asking whether now is good time to exit certain stocks that have registered impressive gains, in anticipation of a correction.</p>
<p>The major unknown, of course, is whether a correction is up ahead. What's one act that will add ammunition to the bears' argument? The U.S. Federal Reserve's monetary policy.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/04/11/inflation-level-not-q1-earnings-to-determine-rallys-fate/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Inflation Level, Not Q1 Earnings, to Determine Rally's Fate</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/04/11/inflation-level-not-q1-earnings-to-determine-rallys-fate/">Inflation Level, Not Q1 Earnings, to Determine Rally's Fate</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Sun, 11 Apr 2010 11:40:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/04/11/inflation-level-not-q1-earnings-to-determine-rallys-fate/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19433926/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/04/11/inflation-level-not-q1-earnings-to-determine-rallys-fate/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>CPI</category><category>earnings</category><category>economic recovery</category><category>inflation</category><category>job growth</category><category>rally</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Joseph Lazzaro]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 11 Apr 2010 11:40:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Cramer on BloggingStocks: This Rally Has Been Easy to Miss]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/22/cramer-on-bloggingstocks-this-rally-has-been-easy-to-miss/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/22/cramer-on-bloggingstocks-this-rally-has-been-easy-to-miss/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/22/cramer-on-bloggingstocks-this-rally-has-been-easy-to-miss/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/marketmatters/" rel="tag">Market Matters</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/c/" rel="tag">Citigroup Inc. (C)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/jim-cramer/" rel="tag">Cramer on BloggingStocks</a></p><div id="thestreet_module"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/06/jimcramer-profile.jpg" alt="" />
<div>
<h3>From <a href="http://www.thestreet.com">TheStreet.com</a> Network</h3>
<ul>
    <li><a href="#">How to Earn $1</a></li>
    <li><a href="http://www.thestreet.com/story/10650886/1/citigroup-denies-it-was-victim-of-hackers.html?puc=aoljjc ">Citigroup Denies It Was Victim of Hackers</a></li>
</ul>
</div>
</div>
<em>TheStreet.com's Jim Cramer says three times a shakeout led to yet-higher prices -- and skittish investors have missed out. </em><br />
<br />
Three times this market eluded people. The first was what looks obvious in retrospect but was actually a perilous bottom, back in March. I wouldn't have recommended it here or on my show if Doug Kass hadn't pushed me and all others who read this site. It was a call of a lifetime. And we all know it, the generational call to get in. So many missed it because the moment was breathtakingly dangerous and could have been binary. I got lucky and backed into it, with Doug's help, simply by tallying all of the individual stocks in a worst-case basis, and you couldn't get much below Dow 6000, which at the time was only 300 points below, barely enough to worry about. That was the Nouriel Roubini heyday, and he managed to mark the bottom by slashing his price target for the Dow to 5000. He could have declared victory and been a hero, a la the now celebrated David Tepper. Instead, I think he's a bum who reiterates his sell at every turn. If you go back and look at all of the stocks that were at a buck and change at the moment, you can see exactly what I mean. Citigroup (<a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/citigroup-incorporated/c/nys">C</a>) (<a target="blank" href="http://find.thestreet.com/cgi-bin/texis/cramertake_free?site=tsc&amp;puc=aoljjc&amp;tkr=C">Cramer's Take</a>), anyone?<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/22/cramer-on-bloggingstocks-this-rally-has-been-easy-to-miss/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Cramer on BloggingStocks: This Rally Has Been Easy to Miss</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/22/cramer-on-bloggingstocks-this-rally-has-been-easy-to-miss/">Cramer on BloggingStocks: This Rally Has Been Easy to Miss</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 22 Dec 2009 09:30:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/22/cramer-on-bloggingstocks-this-rally-has-been-easy-to-miss/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19290742/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/22/cramer-on-bloggingstocks-this-rally-has-been-easy-to-miss/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>c</category><category>featured</category><category>jim cramer</category><category>JimCramer</category><category>rally</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jim Cramer]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 22 Dec 2009 09:30:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[October's almost here: Is the market headed up or down?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/20/octobers-almost-here-is-the-market-headed-up-or-down/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/20/octobers-almost-here-is-the-market-headed-up-or-down/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/20/octobers-almost-here-is-the-market-headed-up-or-down/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/forecasts/" rel="tag">Forecasts</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/indices/" rel="tag">Indices</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/marketmatters/" rel="tag">Market Matters</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/sandp-500/" rel="tag">S and P 500</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/djia/" rel="tag">DJIA</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/housing/" rel="tag">Housing</a></p><p><img border="1" hspace="4" alt="" vspace="4" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/01/econpicture.jpg" width="220" height="263" />It's almost October and the pundits are at again, predicting that the market should sell off again. Let's look at <a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/ousiv/idUSTRE58H53320090918?sp=true">their reasoning</a>.</p>
<ul>
    <li>We have an ongoing deterioration in consumer debt. </li>
    <li>Joseph Stiglitz, Nobel Laureate, says that "the U.S. banking sector is now in worse shape than before the collapse of Lehman Brothers. </li>
    <li>Bank profitability is expected to come under pressure. </li>
    <li>The U.S. housing outlook is grim. </li>
</ul><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/20/octobers-almost-here-is-the-market-headed-up-or-down/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>October's almost here: Is the market headed up or down?</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/20/octobers-almost-here-is-the-market-headed-up-or-down/">October's almost here: Is the market headed up or down?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Sun, 20 Sep 2009 16:10:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/20/octobers-almost-here-is-the-market-headed-up-or-down/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19167482/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/20/octobers-almost-here-is-the-market-headed-up-or-down/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>consumer debt</category><category>dollar</category><category>housing</category><category>inthenews</category><category>Joseph Stiglitz</category><category>October sell off</category><category>rally</category><category>sell short</category><category>stimulus</category><category>stocks</category><category>Treasury bonds</category><category>unemployment</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Connie Madon]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 20 Sep 2009 16:10:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Cramer on BloggingStocks: Not too late to sell ]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/02/cramer-on-bloggingstocks-not-too-late-to-sell/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/02/cramer-on-bloggingstocks-not-too-late-to-sell/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/02/cramer-on-bloggingstocks-not-too-late-to-sell/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/msft/" rel="tag">Microsoft (MSFT)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/aapl/" rel="tag">Apple Inc (AAPL)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/intc/" rel="tag">Intel (INTC)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/marketmatters/" rel="tag">Market Matters</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/crm/" rel="tag">salesforce.com inc (CRM)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/jim-cramer/" rel="tag">Cramer on BloggingStocks</a></p><div id="thestreet_module"> <img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/06/jimcramer-profile.jpg" alt="" />
<div>
<h3>From <a href="http://www.thestreet.com">TheStreet.com</a> Network</h3>
<ul>
    <li><a href="http://www.thestreet.com/story/10593230/1/signs-point-to-a-trend-reversal-in-september.html?puc=aoljjc">Signs Point to a Trend Reversal in September </a></li>
    <li><a href="http://www.thestreet.com/story/10593466/1/asian-stocks-end-mostly-lower-europe-falls.html?puc=aoljjc">Asian Stocks End Mostly Lower; Europe Falls </a></li>
</ul>
</div>
</div>
<span style="font-style: italic;">TheStreet.com's Jim Cramer says the rally hasn't been a sham, but a bigger pullback would be reasonable. </span><br /><br />    I love it! Suddenly it's S&amp;P 900 or bust! Nothing underneath us. The rally revealed as a sham. Even better, a rally in a bear market! <br /><br />  Now we are talking.  <br /><br />  A 45% rally in a bear market. Maybe China had an 85% rally in a bear market! We may have had a 7,500-point rally in a bear market since I started trading 30 years ago.  <br /><br />  I am even thinking that we have never had a bull market! <p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/02/cramer-on-bloggingstocks-not-too-late-to-sell/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Cramer on BloggingStocks: Not too late to sell </em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/02/cramer-on-bloggingstocks-not-too-late-to-sell/">Cramer on BloggingStocks: Not too late to sell </a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 02 Sep 2009 10:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/02/cramer-on-bloggingstocks-not-too-late-to-sell/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19148463/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/02/cramer-on-bloggingstocks-not-too-late-to-sell/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>aapl</category><category>bear market</category><category>BearMarket</category><category>crm</category><category>featured</category><category>intc</category><category>jim cramer</category><category>JimCramer</category><category>msft</category><category>rally</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jim Cramer]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 02 Sep 2009 10:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Does sluggish trading on the NYSE signal a fizzle for stocks?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/26/does-sluggish-trading-on-the-nyse-signal-a-fizzle-for-stocks/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/26/does-sluggish-trading-on-the-nyse-signal-a-fizzle-for-stocks/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/26/does-sluggish-trading-on-the-nyse-signal-a-fizzle-for-stocks/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/major-movement/" rel="tag">Major Movement</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/sandp-500/" rel="tag">S and P 500</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/djia/" rel="tag">DJIA</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/nasdaq/" rel="tag">NASDAQ</a></p><p><img border="1" hspace="4" alt="" vspace="4" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/01/nysepicture.jpg" width="220" height="160" />What's new? Well, trading on the NYSE is sluggish. In fact it's the slowest in two decades. Now, some of this is normal. Brokers often take vacations in July and August. Those who can do so rush out to the Hamptons or Long Island.</p>
<p>But this year is notably slow. Investors are busy digesting second quarter earnings and trying to figure out what to do next. The Dow did reach the 9,000 mark this week, though. We've seen <a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601109&amp;sid=aW7WhLt3wHqk">a 44% rally off the March 9 lows</a>, according to data compiled by Bloomberg, the steepest since the 1930s.</p>
<p> </p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/26/does-sluggish-trading-on-the-nyse-signal-a-fizzle-for-stocks/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Does sluggish trading on the NYSE signal a fizzle for stocks?</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/26/does-sluggish-trading-on-the-nyse-signal-a-fizzle-for-stocks/">Does sluggish trading on the NYSE signal a fizzle for stocks?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Sun, 26 Jul 2009 13:40:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601109&amp;sid=aW7WhLt3wHqk>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/26/does-sluggish-trading-on-the-nyse-signal-a-fizzle-for-stocks/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19109553/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/26/does-sluggish-trading-on-the-nyse-signal-a-fizzle-for-stocks/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Dow</category><category>earnings</category><category>inthenews</category><category>NYSE</category><category>rally</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Connie Madon]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 26 Jul 2009 13:40:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[The Fed Decision: First rule is do no harm!]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/04/29/the-fed-decision-first-fule-is-do-no-harm/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/04/29/the-fed-decision-first-fule-is-do-no-harm/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/04/29/the-fed-decision-first-fule-is-do-no-harm/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/good-news/" rel="tag">Good news</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/economic-data/" rel="tag">Economic Data</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/federal-reserve/" rel="tag">Federal Reserve</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/recession/" rel="tag">Recession</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/financial-crisis/" rel="tag">Financial Crisis</a></p><p><img hspace="4" vspace="4" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/04/fedlogo.jpg" alt="" />The Federal Reserve Open Market Committee (FOMC) issued its decision on interest rates. The market anxiously awaited the decision to determine if there would be any surprises like the previous decision in which the Fed announced a massive quantitative easing program.</p>
<p>This decision was quite different and can be summed up in two words: no change. There was virtually no change from the previous statement aside from an acknowledgment of recent economic news. In other words, it turned out to be a non-event.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/04/29/the-fed-decision-first-fule-is-do-no-harm/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>The Fed Decision: First rule is do no harm!</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/04/29/the-fed-decision-first-fule-is-do-no-harm/">The Fed Decision: First rule is do no harm!</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 29 Apr 2009 16:30:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/04/29/the-fed-decision-first-fule-is-do-no-harm/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1532065/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/04/29/the-fed-decision-first-fule-is-do-no-harm/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>federal reserve</category><category>FederalReserve</category><category>fomc</category><category>inthenews</category><category>rally</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Douglas S. Roberts]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2009 16:30:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Cramer on BloggingStocks: The hedge funds can keep it going ]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/13/cramer-on-bloggingstocks-the-hedge-funds-can-keep-it-going/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/13/cramer-on-bloggingstocks-the-hedge-funds-can-keep-it-going/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/13/cramer-on-bloggingstocks-the-hedge-funds-can-keep-it-going/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/gm/" rel="tag">General Motors (GM)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/marketmatters/" rel="tag">Market Matters</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/politics/" rel="tag">Politics</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/federal-reserve/" rel="tag">Federal Reserve</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/jim-cramer/" rel="tag">Cramer on BloggingStocks</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/recession/" rel="tag">Recession</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/financial-crisis/" rel="tag">Financial Crisis</a></p><div id="thestreet_module"> <img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/06/jimcramer-profile.jpg" alt="" />
<div>
<h3>From <a href="http://www.thestreet.com">TheStreet.com</a> Network</h3>
<ul>
    <li><a href="http://www.thestreet.com/story/10471143/1/the-dow-recaptures-7000.html?puc=aoljjc">The Dow Recaptures 7000 </a></li>
    <li><a href="http://www.thestreet.com/story/10471171/1/cramers-mad-money-recap-this-rally-is-real.html?puc=aoljjc">Cramer's 'Mad Money' Recap: This Rally Is Real </a></li>
</ul>
</div>
</div>
<span style="font-style: italic;">TheStreet.com's Jim Cramer says if they sense they're missing out on a big move, their panic could sustain a rally. </span><br /><br />   The hedge funds don't want this rally to continue, so it may just have to continue. Sometimes it is like that.  <br /><br />  We are going to keep the rally going because of the $193 billion in new drug money and because of the lack of equity issuance and the inability of the <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/proshares-ultrashort-financials/skf/nys">ProShares UltraBear Financials</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/proshares-ultrashort-financials/skf/nys">SKF</a>) (<a target="blank" href="http://find.thestreet.com/cgi-bin/texis/cramertake_free?site=tsc&amp;puc=aoljjc&amp;tkr=SKF">Cramer's Take</a>) types to succeed right now, given the banks' newfound ability to defend themselves. Plus, despite the endless "purist" defenses of a broken system that destroys good banks as well as bad ones, I detect sensibility coming from Ben Bernanke, Tim Geithner, the FASB people and the SEC. The government is trying to take back the system, not the banks, and it shows in a better tone. <p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/13/cramer-on-bloggingstocks-the-hedge-funds-can-keep-it-going/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Cramer on BloggingStocks: The hedge funds can keep it going </em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/13/cramer-on-bloggingstocks-the-hedge-funds-can-keep-it-going/">Cramer on BloggingStocks: The hedge funds can keep it going </a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 13 Mar 2009 10:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/13/cramer-on-bloggingstocks-the-hedge-funds-can-keep-it-going/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1487288/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/13/cramer-on-bloggingstocks-the-hedge-funds-can-keep-it-going/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>bernanke</category><category>featured</category><category>geithener</category><category>gm</category><category>jim cramer</category><category>JimCramer</category><category>rally</category><category>skf</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jim Cramer]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 13 Mar 2009 10:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Are you riding the Obama rally?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/02/are-you-riding-the-obama-rally/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/02/are-you-riding-the-obama-rally/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/02/are-you-riding-the-obama-rally/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/industry/" rel="tag">Industry</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/economic-data/" rel="tag">Economic Data</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/sandp-500/" rel="tag">S and P 500</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/financial-crisis/" rel="tag">Financial Crisis</a></p><p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/12/blog-money-winners-barack-obama-200x267.jpg" alt="" />Since the S&amp;P 500 hit an <a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/rbssFinancialServicesAndRealEstateNews/idUSN2042375820081120">11 year low </a>of on November 20th, it's risen 24%. Does this have anything to do with President-elect Barack Obama? I have absolutely no idea -- but it could. That was the week when Obama cut back on talking about how there was only one President at a time and began to assemble and announce his <a href="http://tpmelectioncentral.talkingpointsmemo.com/2008/11/obama_rolls_out_economic_team.php">economic team</a>.</p>
<p>This was also the time I began to notice that <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/02/why-investors-should-use-stop-losses/">some stocks in my newsletter</a> started to go up. And yet the drumbeat of bad economic news continues -- with the latest being the worst decline in global manufacturing activity in <a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&amp;sid=ar33MwWqPjdQ&amp;refer=home">60 years</a>. The big question for investors is whether the 24% rise in the S&amp;P 500 is the end of a bear market rally or the beginning of a bigger one.</p>
<p>The only rationale I can think of for a rise in stocks is that investors may have concluded that the stimulus plan -- which has been rumored to be potentially $1 trillion -- could boost specific stocks in 2009 as that money begins to create jobs for companies that build roads, bridges, and broadband networks across the U.S. Alternatively, today's rally could reflect investors' realization that with money market and bank deposit rates near zero -- the only way to put all that cash to work is to move into stocks.</p>
<p>Are you participating in this Obama rally? Or do you think it's a head fake? How will you decide it's time to move your cash off the sidelines?</p>
<p><em>Peter Cohan is president of </em><a href="http://petercohan.com/"><font color="#0072bc"><em>Peter S. Cohan &amp; Associates</em></font></a><em>. He also </em><a href="http://www3.babson.edu/Academics/Divisions/management/facultyprofile.cfm?pageid=391236"><font color="#0072bc"><em>teaches management at Babson College</em></font></a><em> and edits</em> <a href="http://petercohan.blogspot.com/2009/01/cohan-letter-15-in-2008.html"><font color="#0072bc">The Cohan Letter</font><the cohan="" letter=""></the><font color="#888888">.</font></a> </p>
<p> </p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/02/are-you-riding-the-obama-rally/">Are you riding the Obama rally?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 02 Jan 2009 18:40:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/02/are-you-riding-the-obama-rally/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1417257/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/02/are-you-riding-the-obama-rally/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>2009</category><category>global manufacturing</category><category>GlobalManufacturing</category><category>obama</category><category>rally</category><category>sp 500</category><category>Sp500</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Peter Cohan]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 02 Jan 2009 18:40:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Cramer on BloggingStocks: The remaining black holes need fixing ]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/21/cramer-on-bloggingstocks-the-remaining-black-holes-need-fixing/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/21/cramer-on-bloggingstocks-the-remaining-black-holes-need-fixing/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/21/cramer-on-bloggingstocks-the-remaining-black-holes-need-fixing/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/f/" rel="tag">Ford Motor (F)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/gm/" rel="tag">General Motors (GM)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/marketmatters/" rel="tag">Market Matters</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/c/" rel="tag">Citigroup Inc. (C)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/jim-cramer/" rel="tag">Cramer on BloggingStocks</a></p><div id="thestreet_module"> <img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/06/jimcramer-profile.jpg" alt="" />
<div>
<h3>From <a href="http://www.thestreet.com">TheStreet.com</a> Network</h3>
<ul>
    <li><a href="http://www.thestreet.com/story/10449247/1/citi-needs-more-than-prince-to-avoid-paupers-grave.html?puc=aoljjc">  Citi Executives Weigh Possible Sale: Report</a></li>
    <li><a href="http://www.thestreet.com/story/10449245/1/congress-wants-plan-from-carmakers-before-giving-id.html?puc=aoljjc">Congress Wants Plan From Carmakers Before Giving Aid </a></li>
</ul>
</div>
</div>
<span style="font-style: italic;">TheStreet.com's Jim Cramer says if Citi is bailed out or bought and the autos get financing, we'd be given a chance to rally. </span><br /><br />  There was a time when I used to talk about the black holes and how if we got them fixed we could tackle the other problems from strength and not weakness.  <br /><br />  When we last looked at the seven black holes only FordGMChrysler (collectively as one) and <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/citigroup-incorporated/c/nys">Citigroup</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/citigroup-incorporated/c/nys">C</a>) (<a target="blank" href="http://find.thestreet.com/cgi-bin/texis/cramertake_free?site=tsc&amp;puc=aoljjc&amp;tkr=C">Cramer's Take</a>) remained.  <br /><br />  The last two days of annihilation came right back to the inability to solve for those black holes.  <br /><br />  Now much has gone wrong for the market since then. Leveraged loans have started to spoil and commercial mortgages have soured. The life insurance annuity issues, pressured by endless declines in the market, get worse by the day. <p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/21/cramer-on-bloggingstocks-the-remaining-black-holes-need-fixing/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Cramer on BloggingStocks: The remaining black holes need fixing </em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/21/cramer-on-bloggingstocks-the-remaining-black-holes-need-fixing/">Cramer on BloggingStocks: The remaining black holes need fixing </a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 21 Nov 2008 09:32:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/21/cramer-on-bloggingstocks-the-remaining-black-holes-need-fixing/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1379254/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/21/cramer-on-bloggingstocks-the-remaining-black-holes-need-fixing/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>c</category><category>f</category><category>featured</category><category>gm</category><category>jim cramer</category><category>JimCramer</category><category>rally</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jim Cramer]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 09:32:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Cramer on BloggingStocks: Sell the Nazz rally ]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/13/cramer-on-bloggingstocks-sell-the-nazz-rally/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/13/cramer-on-bloggingstocks-sell-the-nazz-rally/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/13/cramer-on-bloggingstocks-sell-the-nazz-rally/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/ge/" rel="tag">General Electric (GE)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/intc/" rel="tag">Intel (INTC)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/marketmatters/" rel="tag">Market Matters</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/gs/" rel="tag">Goldman Sachs Group (GS)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/jim-cramer/" rel="tag">Cramer on BloggingStocks</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/nasdaq/" rel="tag">NASDAQ</a></p><div id="thestreet_module"> <img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/06/jimcramer-profile.jpg" alt="" />
<div>
<h3>From <a href="http://www.thestreet.com">TheStreet.com</a> Network</h3>
<ul>
    <li><a href="http://www.thestreet.com/story/10447591/1/intel-slashes-revenue-forecast-update.html?puc=aoljjc">  Intel Slashes Revenue Forecast</a></li>
    <li><a href="http://www.thestreet.com/story/10447601/1/applied-materials-to-cut-12-of-workforce.html?puc=aoljjc">Applied Materials to Cut 12% of Workforce </a></li>
</ul>
</div>
</div>
<span style="font-style: italic;">TheStreet.com's Jim Cramer says analysts will assume the worst is over. They are quite simply wrong. </span><br /> <br /> If the Nasdaq rallies today, please ignore it. If you recall our now totally ridiculous run up in the Nasdaq two weeks ago, a run spurred by numerous upgrades of semiconductor and semiconductor equipment companies by analysts who are always bullish no matter what the fundamentals are, you know that it was dead wrong.  <br /><br />  Dead wrong. I said it at the time, but in this market the bulls don't give a darn because all of their work is based on "cheapness" and that you buy stocks at this stage of a recession because you know we are almost out of it.  <br /><br />  These are lies.  <br /><br />  Today <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/intel-corporation/intc/nas">Intel</a>'s (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/intel-corporation/intc/nas">INTC</a>) (<a target="blank" href="http://find.thestreet.com/cgi-bin/texis/cramertake_free?site=tsc&amp;puc=aoljjc&amp;tkr=INTC">Cramer's Take</a>) really cheap. Using a Warren Buffett analogy -- although he doesn't like tech, just <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/general-electric-company/ge/nys">GE</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/general-electric-company/ge/nys">GE</a>) (<a target="blank" href="http://find.thestreet.com/cgi-bin/texis/cramertake_free?site=tsc&amp;puc=aoljjc&amp;tkr=GE">Cramer's Take</a>) and <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/the-goldman-sachs-group-inc/gs/nys">Goldman</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/the-goldman-sachs-group-inc/gs/nys">GS</a>) (<a target="blank" href="http://find.thestreet.com/cgi-bin/texis/cramertake_free?site=tsc&amp;puc=aoljjc&amp;tkr=GS">Cramer's Take</a>), two "much easier to figure out companies" -- Intel's now genuinely cheap. But then again, I forgot that Buffett's always right -- see <a target="blank" href="http://www.thestreet.com/p/newsanalysis/investing/10447422.html?puc=aoljjc">Doug Kass' column</a> -- and those who say he is wrong are simply short-term trader types. <p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/13/cramer-on-bloggingstocks-sell-the-nazz-rally/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Cramer on BloggingStocks: Sell the Nazz rally </em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/13/cramer-on-bloggingstocks-sell-the-nazz-rally/">Cramer on BloggingStocks: Sell the Nazz rally </a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 13 Nov 2008 09:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/13/cramer-on-bloggingstocks-sell-the-nazz-rally/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1370945/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/13/cramer-on-bloggingstocks-sell-the-nazz-rally/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>featured</category><category>ge</category><category>gs</category><category>intc</category><category>jim cramer</category><category>JimCramer</category><category>nasdaq</category><category>rally</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jim Cramer]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 13 Nov 2008 09:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Cramer on BloggingStocks: Feeling regret over doing the homework ]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/10/29/cramer-on-bloggingstocks-feeling-regret-over-doing-the-homework/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/10/29/cramer-on-bloggingstocks-feeling-regret-over-doing-the-homework/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/10/29/cramer-on-bloggingstocks-feeling-regret-over-doing-the-homework/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/goog/" rel="tag">Google (GOOG)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/aapl/" rel="tag">Apple Inc (AAPL)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/ge/" rel="tag">General Electric (GE)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/marketmatters/" rel="tag">Market Matters</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/cat/" rel="tag">Caterpillar (CAT)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/vz/" rel="tag">Verizon Communications (VZ)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/jim-cramer/" rel="tag">Cramer on BloggingStocks</a></p><div id="thestreet_module"> <img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/06/jimcramer-profile.jpg" alt="" />
<div>
<h3>From <a href="http://www.thestreet.com">TheStreet.com</a> Network</h3>
<ul>
    <li><a href="http://www.thestreet.com/story/10444655/1/dividendcom-whirlpool-not-whirring.html?puc=aoljjc">Whirlpool Not Whirring </a></li>
    <li><a href="http://www.thestreet.com/video/10444611/cramer-cant-trust-a-rally.html?puc=aoljjc">Cramer: Can't Trust a Rally </a></li>
</ul>
</div>
</div>
<em>TheStreet.com's Jim Cramer says maybe the secret is to do no homework. If only that were the case. </em><br /><br />  If you want to participate in the rally that went on Tuesday I have a very specific suggestion: Don't do any homework. And don't listen to any conference calls. And don't pay any attention to the Q&amp;As about credit and where it is going to come from and how quickly stretched balance sheets became because of all of the huge buybacks that were going on for so long.  <br /><br />  Make sure you only follow <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/apple-inc/aapl/nas">Apple</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/apple-inc/aapl/nas">AAPL</a>) (<a target="blank" href="http://find.thestreet.com/cgi-bin/texis/cramertake_free?site=tsc&amp;puc=aoljjc&amp;tkr=AAPL">Cramer's Take</a>), <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/google-inc/goog/nas">Google</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/google-inc/goog/nas">GOOG</a>) (<a target="blank" href="http://find.thestreet.com/cgi-bin/texis/cramertake_free?site=tsc&amp;puc=aoljjc&amp;tkr=GOOG">Cramer's Take</a>) and <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/verizon-communications-inc/vz/nys">Verizon</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/verizon-communications-inc/vz/nys">VZ</a>) (<a target="blank" href="http://find.thestreet.com/cgi-bin/texis/cramertake_free?site=tsc&amp;puc=aoljjc&amp;tkr=VZ">Cramer's Take</a>) as they had great quarters. Don't listen to <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/occidental-petroleum-corporation/oxy/nys">Occidental</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/occidental-petroleum-corporation/oxy/nys">OXY</a>) (<a target="blank" href="http://find.thestreet.com/cgi-bin/texis/cramertake_free?site=tsc&amp;puc=aoljjc&amp;tkr=OXY">Cramer's Take</a>), where the always honest CFO Steve Chazen lays it all out, lays out how so many oil and gas operators will be broken by this decline and the lack of financing available. Don't listen to <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/whirlpool-corporation/whr/nys">Whirlpool</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/whirlpool-corporation/whr/nys">WHR</a>) (<a target="blank" href="http://find.thestreet.com/cgi-bin/texis/cramertake_free?site=tsc&amp;puc=aoljjc&amp;tkr=WHR">Cramer's Take</a>) where you would learn that the worst recession in appliances in three decades is now morphing into the worst ever, and <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/general-electric-company/ge/nys">GE</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/general-electric-company/ge/nys">GE</a>) (<a target="blank" href="http://find.thestreet.com/cgi-bin/texis/cramertake_free?site=tsc&amp;puc=aoljjc&amp;tkr=GE">Cramer's Take</a>) is still trying to sell its appliance division.  <br /><br />  Don't listen to the cliff-like falloff in orders from an industrial outfit like <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/crane-company/cr/nys">Crane</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/crane-company/cr/nys">CR</a>) (<a target="blank" href="http://find.thestreet.com/cgi-bin/texis/cramertake_free?site=tsc&amp;puc=aoljjc&amp;tkr=CR">Cramer's Take</a>). Certainly don't contemplate what <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/caterpillar-incorporated/cat/nys">Caterpillar</a>'s (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/caterpillar-incorporated/cat/nys">CAT</a>) (<a target="blank" href="http://find.thestreet.com/cgi-bin/texis/cramertake_free?site=tsc&amp;puc=aoljjc&amp;tkr=CAT">Cramer's Take</a>) order book looks like or <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/masco-corporation/mas/nys">Masco</a>'s (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/masco-corporation/mas/nys">MAS</a>) (<a target="blank" href="http://find.thestreet.com/cgi-bin/texis/cramertake_free?site=tsc&amp;puc=aoljjc&amp;tkr=MAS">Cramer's Take</a>) for that matter. <p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/10/29/cramer-on-bloggingstocks-feeling-regret-over-doing-the-homework/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Cramer on BloggingStocks: Feeling regret over doing the homework </em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/10/29/cramer-on-bloggingstocks-feeling-regret-over-doing-the-homework/">Cramer on BloggingStocks: Feeling regret over doing the homework </a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 29 Oct 2008 08:39:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/10/29/cramer-on-bloggingstocks-feeling-regret-over-doing-the-homework/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1356154/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/10/29/cramer-on-bloggingstocks-feeling-regret-over-doing-the-homework/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>aapl</category><category>cat</category><category>cr</category><category>featured</category><category>ge</category><category>goog</category><category>jim cramer</category><category>JimCramer</category><category>mas</category><category>oxy</category><category>rally</category><category>vz</category><category>whr</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jim Cramer]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 29 Oct 2008 08:39:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Cramer on BloggingStocks: Good news for once ]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/10/28/cramer-on-bloggingstocks-good-news-for-once/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/10/28/cramer-on-bloggingstocks-good-news-for-once/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/10/28/cramer-on-bloggingstocks-good-news-for-once/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/marketmatters/" rel="tag">Market Matters</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/ba/" rel="tag">Boeing Co (BA)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/hon/" rel="tag">Honeywell Intl (HON)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/utx/" rel="tag">United Technologies (UTX)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/jim-cramer/" rel="tag">Cramer on BloggingStocks</a></p><div id="thestreet_module"> <img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/06/jimcramer-profile.jpg" alt="" />
<div>
<h3>From <a href="http://www.thestreet.com">TheStreet.com</a> Network</h3>
<ul>
    <li><a href="http://www.thestreet.com/story/10444501/1/boeing-union-reach-tentative-accord.html?puc=aoljjc">  Boeing, Union Reach Tentative Accord</a></li>
    <li><a href="http://www.thestreet.com/story/10444499/1/asian-stocks-close-higher.html?puc=aoljjc">Asian Stocks Close Higher</a></li>
</ul>
</div>
</div>
<em>TheStreet.com's Jim Cramer says the relief rally should last at least a day. </em><br /> <br />There's some genuine good news out there. First, the worst-acting groups and countries from yesterday -- the insurers and Hong Kong -- got some good news. The insurers are participating in the federal bailout, something that is needed to protect the value of annuities that are hopelessly underwater; and Hong Kong rallied more than it fell, which seems like total manipulation to me, but who the heck cares if you are a bull.  <br /><br />  Second, the <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/the-boeing-company/ba/nys">Boeing</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/the-boeing-company/ba/nys">BA</a>) (<a target="blank" href="http://find.thestreet.com/cgi-bin/texis/cramertake_free?site=tsc&amp;puc=aoljjc&amp;tkr=BA">Cramer's Take</a>) strike might end soon, and just in time for a lot of quarters, something that a <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/united-technologies-corporation/utx/nys">United Technologies</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/united-technologies-corporation/utx/nys">UTX</a>) (<a target="blank" href="http://find.thestreet.com/cgi-bin/texis/cramertake_free?site=tsc&amp;puc=aoljjc&amp;tkr=UTX">Cramer's Take</a>) and a <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/honeywell-international-inc/hon/nys">Honeywell</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/honeywell-international-inc/hon/nys">HON</a>) (<a target="blank" href="http://find.thestreet.com/cgi-bin/texis/cramertake_free?site=tsc&amp;puc=aoljjc&amp;tkr=HON">Cramer's Take</a>) need to have happen to save their quarters. Those two fine stocks are an easy trade off this news but will presumably open up huge because of the ridiculous futures action.  <br /><br />  As per usual, the hedge funds that most need this lift to get in shape won't take it. They can't afford to leave the market because it is their only way to get the performance back that they need so badly to keep some of the money under management. <p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/10/28/cramer-on-bloggingstocks-good-news-for-once/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Cramer on BloggingStocks: Good news for once </em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/10/28/cramer-on-bloggingstocks-good-news-for-once/">Cramer on BloggingStocks: Good news for once </a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 28 Oct 2008 08:50:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/10/28/cramer-on-bloggingstocks-good-news-for-once/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1354984/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/10/28/cramer-on-bloggingstocks-good-news-for-once/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>ba</category><category>featured</category><category>hon</category><category>jim cramer</category><category>JimCramer</category><category>rally</category><category>relief rally</category><category>ReliefRally</category><category>utx</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jim Cramer]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 28 Oct 2008 08:50:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Don't forget the recession, and automakers' upcoming cuts]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/10/14/dont-forget-the-recession-and-automakers-upcoming-cuts/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/10/14/dont-forget-the-recession-and-automakers-upcoming-cuts/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/10/14/dont-forget-the-recession-and-automakers-upcoming-cuts/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/earnings-reports/" rel="tag">Earnings Reports</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/gm/" rel="tag">General Motors (GM)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/economic-data/" rel="tag">Economic Data</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/recession/" rel="tag">Recession</a></p><p>The US markets did have a furious rally, rising 11% on major indexes. Overnight, Japan's Nikkei was up over 14%. The move to put money into banks and credit markets appears to be working.</p>
<p>But, don't forget the recession, which many economists see lasting longer than any downturn since 1974. Unemployment went to nearly 9% then. That is about 50% higher than the current 6.1% rate.</p>
<p>Yesterday, <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/general-motors-corporation/gm/nys">General Motors Corporation</a> (NYSE:<a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/general-motors-corporation/gm/nys">GM</a>) said it would cut production more. Who would be surprised if the auto industry cut more jobs? The financial sector has lost tens of thousand of jobs, and as bank mergers go through, that is likely to go up sharply.</p>
<p>If there is on element which could pull the stock market back down, it is the realization that the economy is getting much, much worse and that corporate earnings will suffer accordingly. </p>
<p>A new wave of data about the economy will be coming soon. <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB122394029520130715.html?mod=todays_us_money_and_investing">According to</a> <em>The Wall Street Journal, "</em>The biggest data point is: the Census Bureau's retail sales report for September, on Wednesday. Economists expect sales tumbled for the third straight month, led by abysmal auto sales."</p>
<p>Investors who pour their money back into the market now, do so at their own peril. Don't forget the recession.</p>
<p><em>Douglas A. McIntyre is an editor at 247wallst.com.</em></p>
<p> </p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/10/14/dont-forget-the-recession-and-automakers-upcoming-cuts/">Don't forget the recession, and automakers' upcoming cuts</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 14 Oct 2008 10:31:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://online.wsj.com/article/SB122394029520130715.html?mod=todays_us_money_and_investing>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/10/14/dont-forget-the-recession-and-automakers-upcoming-cuts/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1341471/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/10/14/dont-forget-the-recession-and-automakers-upcoming-cuts/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>auto sector</category><category>AutoSector</category><category>financial sector</category><category>FinancialSector</category><category>nikkei</category><category>rally</category><category>recession</category><category>wall street journal</category><category>WallStreetJournal</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Douglas McIntyre]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 14 Oct 2008 10:31:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Latest rally: Déjà vu all over again?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/10/09/latest-rally-deja-vu-all-over-again/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/10/09/latest-rally-deja-vu-all-over-again/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/10/09/latest-rally-deja-vu-all-over-again/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/indices/" rel="tag">Indices</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/marketmatters/" rel="tag">Market Matters</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/mandftoday/" rel="tag">Money and Finance Today</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/analysis/" rel="tag">Technical Analysis</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/sandp-500/" rel="tag">S and P 500</a></p><div><img alt="" hspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/10/arrow_up_up_240.jpg" align="right" vspace="4" border="0" />Some have noted the similarities between the recent run-up in U.S. share prices and the move that took place from March through July. But it's the differences that investors should really be concerned about.<br /></div>
<div> </div>
<div>In both cases, powerful rallies kicked off following mid-month capitulation lows after investors fretted over the fallout from upheaval in credit markets. Each time, the <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/sand-38-p-500-index/%24inx/cmi?tabs=quotesandnews">S&amp;P 500 index</a> managed to tack on about 200 points, or 14%, pushing the benchmark index back towards its March 2000 highs.<br /><br /></div>
<div> </div>
<div>Of course, the first run-up took four months to complete, while the latter occurred in less than half the time. Leaving aside the question of whether the latest move has been a case of "too far, too fast," other comparisons suggest the market's current technical position may, in fact, be more precarious than it was in July, when prices suddenly fell off a cliff.<br /><br /></div>
<div> </div>
<div>For one thing, investors seem to be as or more exuberant now than they were back then, which is the kind of thing that makes most contrarians more than a bit nervous.<br /><br /></div><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/10/09/latest-rally-deja-vu-all-over-again/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Latest rally: Déjà vu all over again?</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/10/09/latest-rally-deja-vu-all-over-again/">Latest rally: Déjà vu all over again?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 09 Oct 2007 13:33:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/10/09/latest-rally-deja-vu-all-over-again/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1009091/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/10/09/latest-rally-deja-vu-all-over-again/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>featured</category><category>index</category><category>Michael Panzner</category><category>MichaelPanzner</category><category>rally</category><category>sell off</category><category>SellOff</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Michael Panzner]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 09 Oct 2007 13:33:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[The basis for a rally is in place]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/08/19/the-basis-for-a-rally-is-in-place/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/08/19/the-basis-for-a-rally-is-in-place/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/08/19/the-basis-for-a-rally-is-in-place/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/aapl/" rel="tag">Apple Inc (AAPL)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/marketmatters/" rel="tag">Market Matters</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/columns/" rel="tag">Columns</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/stocks-to-buy/" rel="tag">Stocks to Buy</a></p><p>Many analysts and traders will cite fundamentals or technicals to explain why the market might or might not rally from this level. In the end, it all comes down to sentiment and market dynamics.</p>
<p>In these volatile times, traders are known for rapidly switching from euphoric optimism to gloomy pessimism. For evidence of this you simply need to watch Cramer for several weeks in a row. I've found that in any given longer-term period, Cramer has a huge tendency to "flip-flop" on his opinions of companies, industries, and the overall market. But he's not to blame -- nearly all of Wall Street's short-term players are like this.</p>
<p>Truth is, the most recent downturn in the market (excluding Thursday and Friday) was much more than noise, and I firmly believe that the Fed cutting rates saved the market, at least over the short term (futures were pointing way down for Friday before the Fed raised).</p>
<p>However, I think the market has to rally if Monday is an up day. Why? Because Wall Street players, which had been so powerfully negative on the market over the last few weeks, will have to shift their position on the markets and increasing their "net-long" exposure. In doing so, they will likely be forced to cover some shorts and add to some longs -- increasing demand for stocks. I believe that this factor was a primary cause of the rocketing market on Friday and, from who I've spoken to, many funds have no adequately adjusted their net-long exposure and are waiting for a "confirmation move" on Monday.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/08/19/the-basis-for-a-rally-is-in-place/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>The basis for a rally is in place</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/08/19/the-basis-for-a-rally-is-in-place/">The basis for a rally is in place</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Sun, 19 Aug 2007 16:10:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/08/19/the-basis-for-a-rally-is-in-place/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/968745/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/08/19/the-basis-for-a-rally-is-in-place/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>AAPL</category><category>Apple</category><category>Baidu</category><category>BIDU</category><category>Georges Yared</category><category>Jim Cramer</category><category>JimCramer</category><category>net-long</category><category>Piggyback Investing</category><category>rally</category><category>rate cuts</category><category>snapback rally</category><category>the Fed</category><category>volatility</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Kevin Kelly]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 19 Aug 2007 16:10:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Daily Option Update - March 8, 2007]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/03/08/daily-option-update-march-8-2007/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/03/08/daily-option-update-march-8-2007/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/03/08/daily-option-update-march-8-2007/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/msft/" rel="tag">Microsoft (MSFT)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/hal/" rel="tag">Halliburton (HAL)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/mo/" rel="tag">Altria Group (MO)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/mnst/" rel="tag">Monster Worldwide (MNST)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/options/" rel="tag">Options</a></p><p><a href="http://www.theflyonthewall.com/splashPage.php?source=AOL"><img align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/03/flywall_final_logo_mini.gif" /></a>The Volatility Index S&amp;P 500 Options-VIX is down 1.64 to 13.60.</p>
<p><strong>Monster Worldwide </strong>(NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/monster-worldwide-inc/mnst/nas">MNST</a>): implied volatility and volume low as MNST rallies on upgrade. MNST is recently up $2.19 to $49.74. MNST has market cap of $6.3 billion. Smith Barney upgraded MNST from Hold to Buy on EPS leverage, robust customer position, potential for share buybacks and positive review of new website. MNST call option volume of 688 contracts compares to put volume of 289 contracts. MNST option implied volatility of 35 is below its 26-week average of 38 according to Track Data, indicating decreasing stock price risk.</p>
<p><strong>Grant Prideco </strong>(NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/grant-prideco-inc/grp/nys">GRP</a>): implied volatility suggests flat risk; rally continues on report. GRP, engaged in drill stem technology development and drill pipe products and services, is recently up $1.95 to $47.16. RBC Capital Markets says, "GRP possible target of Vallourec. GRP jumped 5.6% yesterday due in large part to a story in <em>Challenges</em> magazine citing Vallourec as a suitor. There is a clear industrial fit in the drill pipe and premium connections businesses. However it strikes us as odd that VK would be pursuing an acquisition concurrently with announcing a special dividend." GRP traded 9,482 contracts March 7. GRP call option volume of 2,282 contracts compares to put volume of 844 contracts. GRP April option implied volatility of 40 is near its 26-week average of 42 according to Track Data, suggesting non-directional risk.</p>
<p>Option volume leaders today were: KBR (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/kbr-inc/kbr/nys">KBR</a>), Haliburton (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/halliburton-co-hldg-co/hal/nys">HAL</a>), Altria (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/altria-group-inc/mo/nys">MO</a>) &amp; Microsoft (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/microsoft-corporation/msft/nas">MSFT</a>).</p>
<em>The Daily Option Update is provided by Stock Options Specialist Paul Foster of theflyonthewall.com.</em>
<p> </p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/03/08/daily-option-update-march-8-2007/">Daily Option Update - March 8, 2007</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 08 Mar 2007 14:15:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/03/08/daily-option-update-march-8-2007/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/848564/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/03/08/daily-option-update-march-8-2007/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Daily Option Update</category><category>DailyOptionUpdate</category><category>GRP</category><category>HAL</category><category>implied volatility</category><category>ImpliedVolatility</category><category>KBR</category><category>MNST</category><category>MO</category><category>MSFT</category><category>option</category><category>Rally</category><category>Stock Options Specialist</category><category>StockOptionsSpecialist</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Paul Foster]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 08 Mar 2007 14:15:00 EST</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
