<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd">
<channel>
<title>BloggingStocks</title>
<link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com</link>
<description>BloggingStocks</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[10 craziest days on Wall Street in 2008: #8 We've got a bad feeling about this ...]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/03/10-craziest-days-on-wall-street-in-2008-8-weve-got-a-bad-feel/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/03/10-craziest-days-on-wall-street-in-2008-8-weve-got-a-bad-feel/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/03/10-craziest-days-on-wall-street-in-2008-8-weve-got-a-bad-feel/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/bac/" rel="tag">Bank of America (BAC)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/federal-reserve/" rel="tag">Federal Reserve</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/recession/" rel="tag">Recession</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/financial-crisis/" rel="tag">Financial Crisis</a></p><p><strong><img alt="" hspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2009/01/8.jpg" align="right" vspace="4" border="1" />Jan. 22: Dow 11,971 (down 128 points); trading range, 658 points</strong></p>
<p>The specter of continuing the ugliness seen overnight in the global equity markets and a 95% decline in fourth-quarter (2007) net income at <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/bank-of-america-corporation/bac/nys">Bank of America</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/bank-of-america-corporation/bac/nys">BAC</a>) combined to <a href="http://www.optionszone.com/trading-ideas/gallery/top_10__financial_geniuses__who_got_it_wrong_in_2008-part11.html">shake up those in charge of U.S. monetary policy</a>. </p>
<p>So, facing the possibility of a 500-point drop in the Dow following the long holiday weekend, the Fed sprang into action early to shore up the markets.</p>
<p>The move was a 75-basis-point pre-market intermeeting cut just eight days before the Fed's regularly scheduled meeting to drop the<a href="http://www.optionszone.com/learn-more/john-jagerson/2008/11/how-to-trade-fed-funds-futures.html"> fed funds rate</a> to 3.5% and the discount rate to 4%. The Fed made this move "in view of a weakening of the economic outlook and increasing downside risks to growth," adding, "appreciable downside risks to growth remain."</p>
<p>The Dow battled all day to recover from an early session drop of 459 points to close down only 128 by the closing bell.</p>
<p><em>Greg Tucker is the executive editor of <a href="http://www.optionszone.com/learn-more/andrew-houghton-nick-atkeson/gallery/worst-and-best-trades-from-2008.html">OptionsZone.com</a>.</em></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/03/10-craziest-days-on-wall-street-in-2008-8-weve-got-a-bad-feel/">10 craziest days on Wall Street in 2008: #8 We've got a bad feeling about this ...</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Sat, 03 Jan 2009 12:30:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/03/10-craziest-days-on-wall-street-in-2008-8-weve-got-a-bad-feel/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1417208/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/03/10-craziest-days-on-wall-street-in-2008-8-weve-got-a-bad-feel/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>ben bernancke</category><category>ben bernanke</category><category>BenBernanke</category><category>bernanke</category><category>global recession</category><category>GlobalRecession</category><category>interest rate cut</category><category>interest rates</category><category>InterestRateCut</category><category>InterestRates</category><category>rate cut</category><category>RateCut</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Greg Tucker]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 03 Jan 2009 12:30:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Best Trades of 2008: #2 Getting long and staying long the 30-year Treasury bond]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/12/31/best-trades-of-2008-2-getting-long-and-staying-long-the-30-yea/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/12/31/best-trades-of-2008-2-getting-long-and-staying-long-the-30-yea/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/12/31/best-trades-of-2008-2-getting-long-and-staying-long-the-30-yea/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/newsletters/" rel="tag">Newsletters</a></p><p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/12/best-trade-2.jpg" alt="" />This strategy went from being a modestly successful trade through October to a <a href="http://www.optionszone.com/learn-more/andrew-houghton-nick-atkeson/gallery/nine-winning-trades.html">hero-sized trade</a> in the past 45 days. </p>
<p>The Fed funds rate, the most widely followed interest rate <a href="http://www.optionszone.com/trading-ideas/2008/12/the-best-way-to-trade-the-banks-in-early-2009.html">the banks</a> charge each other for overnight lending, topped out in August 2006, at 5.25%. </p>
<p>When the Fed started easing rates thereafter, no one at the economic think tanks forecasted anything close to what we are seeing today (namely a Fed funds rate of zero to 0.25% -- a decline of a full 5% in 17 months).</p>
<p>The decline in rates started out so orderly and coordinated that it seemed almost too good to be true, and the Dow Jones Industrial Average hit an all-time high, topping 14,000 for the first time in July 2007. </p>
<p>However, the quarter-point cuts gave way to a three-quarter-point cut, or 75 basis points, on Jan. 22, 2008, signaling that the Fed was seeing a material breakdown in the credit and housing markets. Following that seemingly radical rate cut, just eight days later on Jan. 30, the Fed again slashed the Fed funds rate by another half point, or 50 basis points, to 3%. </p>
<p>From there Bernanke &amp; Co. held steady for a couple months to see if any good would come of their efforts. </p>
<p>When evidence of further erosion in the credit markets surfaced with the impending collapse of <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/federal-national-mortgage-association/fnm/nys">Fannie Mae</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/federal-national-mortgage-association/fnm/nys">FNM</a>), <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/federal-home-loan-mortgage-corporation/fre/nys">Freddie Mac</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/federal-home-loan-mortgage-corporation/fre/nys">FRE</a>), Indy Mac, Bear Streans and <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/lehman-brothers-holding/lehmq/nao">Lehman Brothers</a> (OTC: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/lehman-brothers-holding/lehmq/nao">LEHMQ</a>), the Fed lopped another three-quarters of a point off the Fed funds rate, taking it down to 2.25% on March 18. </p>
<p>That was considered the absolute floor at the time, a level that would stick. But that wasn't the case. </p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/12/31/best-trades-of-2008-2-getting-long-and-staying-long-the-30-yea/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Best Trades of 2008: #2 Getting long and staying long the 30-year Treasury bond</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/12/31/best-trades-of-2008-2-getting-long-and-staying-long-the-30-yea/">Best Trades of 2008: #2 Getting long and staying long the 30-year Treasury bond</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 31 Dec 2008 12:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/12/31/best-trades-of-2008-2-getting-long-and-staying-long-the-30-yea/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1413785/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/12/31/best-trades-of-2008-2-getting-long-and-staying-long-the-30-yea/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>30-year Treasury bonds</category><category>30-yearTreasuryBonds</category><category>best trades of 2008</category><category>BestTradesOf2008</category><category>bond yields</category><category>bonds</category><category>BondYields</category><category>bryan perry</category><category>BryanPerry</category><category>fed</category><category>fed funds rate</category><category>federal reserve</category><category>FederalReserve</category><category>FedFundsRate</category><category>interest rates</category><category>InterestRates</category><category>rate cut</category><category>rate cuts</category><category>RateCut</category><category>RateCuts</category><category>T-bond</category><category>treasury bonds</category><category>TreasuryBonds</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Bryan Perry]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 2008 12:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Fed shoots its last bullet]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/12/16/fed-shoots-its-last-bullet/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/12/16/fed-shoots-its-last-bullet/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/12/16/fed-shoots-its-last-bullet/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/economic-data/" rel="tag">Economic Data</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/federal-reserve/" rel="tag">Federal Reserve</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/financial-crisis/" rel="tag">Financial Crisis</a></p><p><img hspace="4" align="right" vspace="4" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/04/fedlogo.jpg" />The Federal Reserve just announced a bigger-than-expected rate cut. And with that, it has used up its short-term rate cutting ammunition for the first time in history. <br /></p>
<p>The sad part is that even though the Fed has been cutting rates -- from 5.25% last summer to today -- the economy has not responded.</p>
<p>The specifics of today's rate cut are historic. The Fed lowered its target for the overnight federal funds rate to a range of between <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2008/12/17/business/economy/17fed.html?hp">0% and 0.25%</a> -- a record low. Even though it's a historic low, today's announcement was ratifying the market reality -- demand for interbank loans has been so low that the actual Fed funds rate has been at <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2008/12/17/business/economy/17fed.html?hp">0.1%</a> in the last several days.</p>
<p>The problem is that even though we are in a financial meltdown caused by too much borrowing, the Fed has decided that the best way to solve the problem is to get people to borrow more. But they don't want to lend the money that the Fed is giving away. Meanwhile, prices dropped in November by <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2008/12/17/business/economy/17fed.html?hp">1.7%</a> -- more than ever in recorded history -- due largely to a rapid decline in energy prices. </p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/12/16/fed-shoots-its-last-bullet/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Fed shoots its last bullet</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/12/16/fed-shoots-its-last-bullet/">Fed shoots its last bullet</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 16 Dec 2008 15:17:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.nytimes.com/2008/12/17/business/economy/17fed.html?hp>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/12/16/fed-shoots-its-last-bullet/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1403283/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/12/16/fed-shoots-its-last-bullet/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Ben Bernanke</category><category>BenBernanke</category><category>federal reserve</category><category>FederalReserve</category><category>inthenews</category><category>rate cut</category><category>RateCut</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Peter Cohan]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 16 Dec 2008 15:17:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Cramer on BloggingStocks: European central bank lets us all down ]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/06/cramer-on-bloggingstocks-european-central-bank-lets-us-all-down/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/06/cramer-on-bloggingstocks-european-central-bank-lets-us-all-down/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/06/cramer-on-bloggingstocks-european-central-bank-lets-us-all-down/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/csco/" rel="tag">Cisco Systems (CSCO)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/marketmatters/" rel="tag">Market Matters</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/wfc/" rel="tag">Wells Fargo (WFC)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/jim-cramer/" rel="tag">Cramer on BloggingStocks</a></p><div id="thestreet_module"> <img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/06/jimcramer-profile.jpg" alt="" />
<div>
<h3>From <a href="http://www.thestreet.com">TheStreet.com</a> Network</h3>
<ul>
    <li><a href="http://www.thestreet.com/story/10446338/1/boe-ecb-slash-interest-rates.html?puc=aoljjc"> BOE, ECB Slash Interest Rates</a></li>
    <li><a href="http://www.thestreet.com/story/10446324/1/asian-stocks-close-lower-thursday.html?puc=aoljjc"> Asian Stocks Close Lower Thursday</a></li>
</ul>
</div>
</div>
<span style="font-style: italic;">TheStreet.com's Jim Cramer says the paltry half-point cut means we're headed lower once again. </span><br /><br /> Wrong! <br /><br /> The European Central Bank needed to move in lock step with the Bank of England. It left us hanging with a half-point cut. <br /><br /> That means we're sunk again. <br /><br /> The near-term tug of war just got uglier. Without the ECB cutting as much as the BOE, we have no reason to buy. <br /><br /> Period. <br /><br /> Last night, in a meeting with a bunch of hedge fund managers, there was uniform agreement that the market has to be bought with huge rate cuts, that you need to ignore the near-term <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/cisco-systems-inc/csco/nas">Cisco</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/cisco-systems-inc/csco/nas">CSCO</a>) (<a href="http://find.thestreet.com/cgi-bin/texis/cramertake_free?site=tsc&amp;puc=aoljjc&amp;tkr=CSCO" target="blank">Cramer's Take</a>) (to use the generic version of crummy earnings) and go with the <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/wells-fargo-and-company/wfc/nys">Wells Fargo</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/wells-fargo-and-company/wfc/nys">WFC</a>) (<a href="http://find.thestreet.com/cgi-bin/texis/cramertake_free?site=tsc&amp;puc=aoljjc&amp;tkr=WFC" target="blank">Cramer's Take</a>) offering that will make it so lending will come again and demand be spurred. <p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/06/cramer-on-bloggingstocks-european-central-bank-lets-us-all-down/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Cramer on BloggingStocks: European central bank lets us all down </em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/06/cramer-on-bloggingstocks-european-central-bank-lets-us-all-down/">Cramer on BloggingStocks: European central bank lets us all down </a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 06 Nov 2008 09:57:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/06/cramer-on-bloggingstocks-european-central-bank-lets-us-all-down/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1364115/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/06/cramer-on-bloggingstocks-european-central-bank-lets-us-all-down/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>boe</category><category>csco</category><category>ecb</category><category>featured</category><category>jim cramer</category><category>JimCramer</category><category>rate cut</category><category>RateCut</category><category>wfc</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jim Cramer]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 06 Nov 2008 09:57:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Fed cuts rates 50 basis points. What would Milton do?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/10/08/fed-cuts-rates-50-basis-points-what-would-milton-do/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/10/08/fed-cuts-rates-50-basis-points-what-would-milton-do/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/10/08/fed-cuts-rates-50-basis-points-what-would-milton-do/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/federal-reserve/" rel="tag">Federal Reserve</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/financial-crisis/" rel="tag">Financial Crisis</a></p><p>The Federal Reserve couldn't wait until October 29th to cut rates. Instead, it <a href="http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/27080774/">slashed its Fed Funds rate 0.5%</a> to 1.5% in a move that was coordinated with other central banks. Interestingly, Milton Friedman's acolyte, Anna Schwartz, recently observed that Fed Chair Ben Bernanke, who is reportedly a student of the Great Depression, is taking the wrong approach to this crisis.</p>
<p>Milton Friedman is widely regarded as the economist who figured out that a lack of liquidity is the reason that the economy took such a tailspin after the crash of 1929. Schwartz, 92, co-authored <em>A Monetary History of the United States 1867-1960</em>, with Friedman. And her assessment of Bernanke is <a href="http://www.irishtimes.com/newspaper/innovation/2008/1006/1222959318754.html">brutal</a>. She thinks he should be fired. The reason? She believes that he and Paulson made a huge mistake in bailing out failed companies. In her view, they underestimated the free market's ability to recover from such failures.</p>
<p>Scwhartz also faults them for issuing dire warnings about how capitalism would fail unless Congress passed their bailout bill. I guess Friedman and Schwartz have influenced my thinking as reflected in this post about <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/09/24/let-the-market-fix-the-crisis/">letting free markets work</a> and this one questioning the <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/09/21/why-is-paulson-so-desperate-to-spend-700-billion-of-our-money/">fear tactics</a> used to sell their program. This morning's emergency rate cut suggests that for all the fear mongering used to sell their program, its effect has not helped the markets, which have lost <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/10/08/global-catastrophe-continues-asia-down-10-britain-injects-88/">$2.8 trillion</a> since the day investors thought the bill would pass.</p>
<p>Milton would have let the failed institutions fail. But it's too late to know whether his ideas would have worked.</p>
<p><em>Peter Cohan is president of</em> <a href="http://petercohan.com/"><em><font color="#0072bc">Peter S. Cohan &amp; Associates</font></em></a><em>. He also </em><a href="http://www3.babson.edu/Academics/Divisions/management/facultyprofile.cfm?pageid=391236"><em><font color="#0072bc">teaches management at Babson College</font></em></a><em> and edits </em><em><a href="http://petercohan.blogspot.com/2008/01/cohan-letter-up-18-in-2007.html"><font color="#0072bc">The Cohan Letter</font></a></em><em>. </em></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/10/08/fed-cuts-rates-50-basis-points-what-would-milton-do/">Fed cuts rates 50 basis points. What would Milton do?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 08 Oct 2008 09:30:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/10/08/fed-cuts-rates-50-basis-points-what-would-milton-do/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1336144/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/10/08/fed-cuts-rates-50-basis-points-what-would-milton-do/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>federal reserve</category><category>FederalReserve</category><category>inthenews</category><category>rate cut</category><category>RateCut</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Peter Cohan]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 08 Oct 2008 09:30:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Cramer on BloggingStocks: The cut lets you fold the weak hands ]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/10/08/cramer-on-bloggingstocks-the-cut-lets-you-fold-the-weak-hands/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/10/08/cramer-on-bloggingstocks-the-cut-lets-you-fold-the-weak-hands/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/10/08/cramer-on-bloggingstocks-the-cut-lets-you-fold-the-weak-hands/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/marketmatters/" rel="tag">Market Matters</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/c/" rel="tag">Citigroup Inc. (C)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/aa/" rel="tag">Alcoa Inc (AA)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/stocks-to-sell/" rel="tag">Stocks to Sell</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/federal-reserve/" rel="tag">Federal Reserve</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/jim-cramer/" rel="tag">Cramer on BloggingStocks</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/met/" rel="tag">MetLife Inc. (MET)</a></p><img hspace="4" align="right" vspace="4" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/09/james_cramer_original-%28wince%29.jpg" /><span style="font-style: italic;">TheStreet.com's Jim Cramer says you can use the bounce today to sell names with earnings troubles. </span><br />  <br />  A suggestion: If you know that your company has earnings problems, you are going to get a lift today that will allow you to get out at a better price. What do I mean about earnings problems? Let's consider <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/alcoa-inc/aa/nys">Alcoa</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/alcoa-inc/aa/nys">AA</a>) (<a href="http://find.thestreet.com/cgi-bin/texis/cramertake_free?site=tsc&amp;puc=aoljjc&amp;tkr=F" target="blank">Cramer's Take</a>). That was a dismal quarter. The stock would not be up if it weren't for the rate cuts.  <br /><br />  Or how about the financials? We learned last night that <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/metlife-inc/met/nys">MetLife</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/metlife-inc/met/nys">MET</a>) (<a href="http://find.thestreet.com/cgi-bin/texis/cramertake_free?site=tsc&amp;puc=aoljjc&amp;tkr=F" target="blank">Cramer's Take</a>) needed a lot more capital. We have to presume all insurance companies need more capital. So get ready or sell and buy lower. <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/citigroup-incorporated/c/nys">Citigroup</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/citigroup-incorporated/c/nys">C</a>) (<a href="http://find.thestreet.com/cgi-bin/texis/cramertake_free?site=tsc&amp;puc=aoljjc&amp;tkr=F" target="blank">Cramer's Take</a>) is in the same boat. It is not going to have a good quarter and it needs to do a capital raise. You are going to get a terrific opportunity to sell today.  <br /><br />  I also feel the same for most retailers. We have to be very careful here because unless you are in a retailer that picks up share in hard times, you need to use the strength to sell.  <br /><br />  What can be held? I think that you can keep the stocks with good dividends that are able to pay them. You can certainly buy stocks that are trading near their cash. <p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/10/08/cramer-on-bloggingstocks-the-cut-lets-you-fold-the-weak-hands/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Cramer on BloggingStocks: The cut lets you fold the weak hands </em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/10/08/cramer-on-bloggingstocks-the-cut-lets-you-fold-the-weak-hands/">Cramer on BloggingStocks: The cut lets you fold the weak hands </a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 08 Oct 2008 09:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/10/08/cramer-on-bloggingstocks-the-cut-lets-you-fold-the-weak-hands/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1336182/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/10/08/cramer-on-bloggingstocks-the-cut-lets-you-fold-the-weak-hands/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>aa</category><category>c</category><category>FDIC</category><category>featured</category><category>federal reserve</category><category>FederalReserve</category><category>jim cramer</category><category>JimCramer</category><category>met</category><category>rate cut</category><category>RateCut</category><category>TARP</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jim Cramer]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 08 Oct 2008 09:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[A mistake, Fed won't help with interest rate cuts]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/09/16/a-mistake-fed-wont-help-with-interest-rate-cuts/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/09/16/a-mistake-fed-wont-help-with-interest-rate-cuts/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/09/16/a-mistake-fed-wont-help-with-interest-rate-cuts/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/forecasts/" rel="tag">Forecasts</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/bad-news/" rel="tag">Bad News</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/hpq/" rel="tag">Hewlett-Packard (HPQ)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/economic-data/" rel="tag">Economic Data</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/housing/" rel="tag">Housing</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/federal-reserve/" rel="tag">Federal Reserve</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/recession/" rel="tag">Recession</a></p><p>Most analysts believe that the Fed will not make an emergency cut in rates. The decision is a mistake and the agency will live to regret it.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/newsOne/idUSSYD20530220080916">According to</a> Reuters," Federal Reserve policy-makers are expected to stop short of lowering U.S. interest rates at a meeting on Tuesday ." Bernanke &amp; Co. will probably state a willingness to bring rates down if it feels that the economy needs to be protected.</p>
<p>The economy needs to be protected now. Wall Street is not the only part of America that is coming apart. The number of people out of work is rising according to the government's own data. With layoffs in the financial sector and at companies including <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/hewlett-packard-company/hpq/nys">Hewlett-Packard</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/hewlett-packard-company/hpq/nys">HPQ</a>), which yesterday cut almost 25,000 jobs, the mass of people out of work will continue to rise sharply.</p>
<p>The average middle class American has not only lost all of the equity in his home, he now faces a sharp drop in the value of the portion of his retirement invested in the stock market.</p>
<p>If the current situation is not an emergency, what is?</p>
<p><em>Douglas A. McIntyre is an editor at 247wallst.com. </em></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/09/16/a-mistake-fed-wont-help-with-interest-rate-cuts/">A mistake, Fed won't help with interest rate cuts</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 16 Sep 2008 08:58:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.reuters.com/article/newsOne/idUSSYD20530220080916>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/09/16/a-mistake-fed-wont-help-with-interest-rate-cuts/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1315229/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/09/16/a-mistake-fed-wont-help-with-interest-rate-cuts/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>bernanke</category><category>federal reserve</category><category>FederalReserve</category><category>HPQ</category><category>inthenews</category><category>rate cut</category><category>RateCut</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Douglas McIntyre]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 16 Sep 2008 08:58:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Cramer on BloggingStocks: You can't have it both ways ]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/08/05/cramer-on-bloggingstocks-you-cant-have-it-both-ways/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/08/05/cramer-on-bloggingstocks-you-cant-have-it-both-ways/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/08/05/cramer-on-bloggingstocks-you-cant-have-it-both-ways/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/marketmatters/" rel="tag">Market Matters</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/c/" rel="tag">Citigroup Inc. (C)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/bac/" rel="tag">Bank of America (BAC)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/commodities/" rel="tag">Commodities</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/federal-reserve/" rel="tag">Federal Reserve</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/jim-cramer/" rel="tag">Cramer on BloggingStocks</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/09/james_cramer_original-%28wince%29.jpg" /><span style="font-style: italic;">TheStreet.com's Jim Cramer says this commodity collapse is giving the Fed room to cut. </span><br style="font-style: italic;" /><br />  As the Fed meets and the credit crisis still roars, it is worth assessing all of the chatter that the Fed can't do a thing and that every aspect of everything is all bad. I put it like that because it is hard to read anything without concluding that there will be high-double-digit defaults and that the credit markets haven been crushed and are not useful and the world is, well, coming to an end.  <br /><br />  Funny thing: when the world comes to an end, you get a collapse in commodities, which is what is happening right now; it is something the Fed should keep an eye on. That's because there is suddenly more room to cut if necessary, and that matters because the banks need it -- they need more room to make money on net interest margins and playing the curve, because we all know that they need capital, and this is a good way to raise capital. It is the way that capital was raised for BankBoston and <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/bank-of-america-corporation/bac/nys">Bank of America</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/bank-of-america-corporation/bac/nys">BAC</a>) (<a href="http://find.thestreet.com/cgi-bin/texis/cramertake_free?site=tsc&amp;puc=aoljjc&amp;tkr=BAC" target="blank">Cramer's Take</a>) and Chase and <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/citigroup-incorporated/c/nys">Citigroup </a>(NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/citigroup-incorporated/c/nys">C</a>) (<a href="http://find.thestreet.com/cgi-bin/texis/cramertake_free?site=tsc&amp;puc=aoljjc&amp;tkr=C" target="blank">Cramer's Take</a>) in the old days, and it would be the same again if the Fed needs to help.  <br /><br />  In other words, caught in all the gloom is the fact that the Fed is winning, and with winning comes flexibility. I expect nothing from the Fed, nothing, but I also want to remind people that the "Fed will raise soon" talk makes no sense whatsoever now, even though the drumbeat was really loud just a couple of months ago. <p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/08/05/cramer-on-bloggingstocks-you-cant-have-it-both-ways/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Cramer on BloggingStocks: You can't have it both ways </em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/08/05/cramer-on-bloggingstocks-you-cant-have-it-both-ways/">Cramer on BloggingStocks: You can't have it both ways </a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 05 Aug 2008 09:15:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/08/05/cramer-on-bloggingstocks-you-cant-have-it-both-ways/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1275691/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/08/05/cramer-on-bloggingstocks-you-cant-have-it-both-ways/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>bac</category><category>c</category><category>cramer</category><category>featured</category><category>federal reserve</category><category>FederalReserve</category><category>jim cramer</category><category>JimCramer</category><category>rate cut</category><category>RateCut</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jim Cramer]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 05 Aug 2008 09:15:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[The Fed Beige Book Report: Hawkish talk, but no action]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/07/23/the-fed-beige-book-report-hawkish-talk-not-action/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/07/23/the-fed-beige-book-report-hawkish-talk-not-action/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/07/23/the-fed-beige-book-report-hawkish-talk-not-action/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/forecasts/" rel="tag">Forecasts</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/economic-data/" rel="tag">Economic Data</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/commodities/" rel="tag">Commodities</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/oil/" rel="tag">Oil</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/housing/" rel="tag">Housing</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/federal-reserve/" rel="tag">Federal Reserve</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/recession/" rel="tag">Recession</a></p><p>The Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City released its Beige Book Report detailing economic activity among the twelve Federal Reserve Districts across the country. The pace of economic activity was quite sluggish throughout much of the country. At the same time, there have been hawkish comments recently by several Fed governors. This leads us to the question of the possibility of a Fed rate increase on the horizon.</p>
<p>However, one must remember that hawkish talk is quite different from hawkish action. As I have said in my book, <em><a href="http://www.FollowtheFedtheBook.com">Follow the Fed to Investment Success</a></em>, "watch what the Fed does not what it says." </p>
<p>The Fed has given no indication that an imminent raise in interest rates is forthcoming. There have simply been hawkish comments, which are an incredibly inexpensive means of maintaining its inflation-fighting credentials. However, every time market turmoil arises, the Fed adopts a more conciliatory tone.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/07/23/the-fed-beige-book-report-hawkish-talk-not-action/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>The Fed Beige Book Report: Hawkish talk, but no action</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/07/23/the-fed-beige-book-report-hawkish-talk-not-action/">The Fed Beige Book Report: Hawkish talk, but no action</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 23 Jul 2008 15:33:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/07/23/the-fed-beige-book-report-hawkish-talk-not-action/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1265218/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/07/23/the-fed-beige-book-report-hawkish-talk-not-action/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>beige book</category><category>BeigeBook</category><category>federal reserve</category><category>FederalReserve</category><category>inthenews</category><category>rate cut</category><category>rate hike</category><category>RateCut</category><category>RateHike</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Douglas S. Roberts]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 23 Jul 2008 15:33:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Do Fed rate cuts help adjustable rate mortgage holders?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/04/30/do-fed-rate-cuts-help-adjustable-rate-mortgage-holders/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/04/30/do-fed-rate-cuts-help-adjustable-rate-mortgage-holders/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/04/30/do-fed-rate-cuts-help-adjustable-rate-mortgage-holders/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/bsc/" rel="tag">Bear Stearns Cos (BSC)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/housing/" rel="tag">Housing</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/federal-reserve/" rel="tag">Federal Reserve</a></p><p><img alt="" hspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/12/house.jpg" align="right" vspace="4" />Fed rate cuts help people who hold adjustable rate mortgages (ARMs) but they're less valuable to people seeking new mortgages. </p>
<p>That's because ARM rates reset periodically -- e.g., every year -- based on an index plus a lender's margin -- the amount a lender adds to the index, usually two percentage points or four percentage points, to set the actual interest rate of the ARM. The most common index for ARM adjustments is the one-year U.S. Treasury bill.</p>
<p>Last Friday, the one year treasury rate was at <a href="http://www.federalreserve.gov/releases/h15/current/">1.88%</a> -- down 3.04 percentage points below the <a href="http://www.federalreserve.gov/releases/h15/20070409/">4.92%</a> rate it was at in April 2007. The Fed's rate cutting has lowered the rates at the reset periods for those who already have adjustable rate mortgages. So a person who paid 2% plus the 1-year t-bill rate in April 2007 would have paid 6.92% during the last year and enjoyed a reset to 3.88% as of last week. </p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/04/30/do-fed-rate-cuts-help-adjustable-rate-mortgage-holders/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Do Fed rate cuts help adjustable rate mortgage holders?</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/04/30/do-fed-rate-cuts-help-adjustable-rate-mortgage-holders/">Do Fed rate cuts help adjustable rate mortgage holders?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 30 Apr 2008 17:20:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/04/30/do-fed-rate-cuts-help-adjustable-rate-mortgage-holders/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1182406/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/04/30/do-fed-rate-cuts-help-adjustable-rate-mortgage-holders/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>arm</category><category>featured</category><category>federal reserve</category><category>FederalReserve</category><category>mortgage</category><category>rate cut</category><category>RateCut</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Peter Cohan]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 30 Apr 2008 17:20:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Fed cuts rates, signals pause -- Dow tops 13,000]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/04/30/fed-cut-rates-signals-pause-dow-tops-13-000/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/04/30/fed-cut-rates-signals-pause-dow-tops-13-000/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/04/30/fed-cut-rates-signals-pause-dow-tops-13-000/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/economic-data/" rel="tag">Economic Data</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/headline-news/" rel="tag">Headline News</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/housing/" rel="tag">Housing</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/federal-reserve/" rel="tag">Federal Reserve</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/recession/" rel="tag">Recession</a></p>Not at all surprising, the Federal Reserve has <a href="http://www.federalreserve.gov/newsevents/press/monetary/20080430a.htm">announced</a> it cut its benchmark federal funds rate by a quarter percentage point, to 2%. Further, it also signaled it would pause the recent policy of rate cuts as it removed some language that was previously present in the statements regarding downside risks to economic growth.<br /><br />Despite the move being fully expected, especially after today's GDP report showed the economy hasn't contracted and that inflationary pressures weren't as high as presumed, the stock market reacted positively and Dow Jones Industrial Average topped 13,000 for the first time since January. Better than expected results from General Motors (NYSE: GM) and Procter &amp; Gamble (NYSE: PG) also added to the positive sentiment.<br /><br />
<div class="p">While the Fed slowing the pace of its rate cuts, if not pausing them altogether, might usually be considered as negative for stocks, it seems investors took the positive news that the economy may need less bolstering more into consideration this time. Sure, the housing sector, the credit crunch, consumer spending and the labor market were noted by the Fed as weak, under stress or requiring help, but the statement also mentioned that the easing policy to date "should help to promote moderate growth over time." And that is what the market may be reacting to mostly.<br /><br />As we've seen the last few weeks, the market has been on a steady upward trend. Being forward looking, if investors believe the measure taken by the Fed so far and in the future will succeed, we may yet see this trend continue.<br /><br /><strong>Update 3:25 PM:</strong> The initial reaction to the news has reversed its course by now and the Dow, which has topped 13,000 briefly earlier is now up only 27 points. The Nasdaq composite and the S&amp;P 500, which have originally joined the initial rally are now in the red. Perhaps the uncertain pause isn't being accepted as well after all, especially with more and more economists warning the economy is still in a bad shape, inflationary pressures still high and that all that could definitely affect corporate profits.<br /></div><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/04/30/fed-cut-rates-signals-pause-dow-tops-13-000/">Fed cuts rates, signals pause -- Dow tops 13,000</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 30 Apr 2008 14:43:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/04/30/fed-cut-rates-signals-pause-dow-tops-13-000/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1182273/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/04/30/fed-cut-rates-signals-pause-dow-tops-13-000/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>federal reserve</category><category>FederalReserve</category><category>inthenews</category><category>rate cut</category><category>RateCut</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Melly Alazraki]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 30 Apr 2008 14:43:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Option update: Fannie Mae volatility stays elevated as shares rally into rate cut]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/03/18/option-update-fannie-mae-volatility-stays-elevated-as-shares-ra/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/03/18/option-update-fannie-mae-volatility-stays-elevated-as-shares-ra/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/03/18/option-update-fannie-mae-volatility-stays-elevated-as-shares-ra/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/fnm/" rel="tag">Federal Natl Mtge (FNM)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/options/" rel="tag">Options</a></p><p><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/federal-national-mortgage-association/fnm/nys"><img align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/03/flywall_final_logo_mini.gif" alt="" /><strong>Fannie Mae</strong></a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/federal-national-mortgage-association/fnm/nys">FNM</a>) is recently up $4.99 to $27.17. Goldman Sachs lowered its 12-month price target to $16 from $24. FNM call option volume is 46,713 contracts, compared to put volume of 64,318 contracts. </p>
<p>FNM April option implied volatility of 98 is above its 26-week average of 58 according to Track Data, suggesting larger price risk.</p>
<p>The Volatility Index (VIX) is down 3.26 to 28.98.</p>
<p><em>Option Update is provided by Stock Specialist Paul Foster of theflyonthewall.com.</em><br /></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/03/18/option-update-fannie-mae-volatility-stays-elevated-as-shares-ra/">Option update: Fannie Mae volatility stays elevated as shares rally into rate cut</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 18 Mar 2008 15:25:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/03/18/option-update-fannie-mae-volatility-stays-elevated-as-shares-ra/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1143308/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/03/18/option-update-fannie-mae-volatility-stays-elevated-as-shares-ra/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>FNM</category><category>option implied volatility</category><category>OptionImpliedVolatility</category><category>rate cut</category><category>RateCut</category><category>VIX</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Paul Foster]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 18 Mar 2008 15:25:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[How the Fed's rate cuts stifle capital investment]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/03/18/how-the-feds-rate-cuts-stifle-capital-investment/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/03/18/how-the-feds-rate-cuts-stifle-capital-investment/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/03/18/how-the-feds-rate-cuts-stifle-capital-investment/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/bad-news/" rel="tag">Bad News</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/economic-data/" rel="tag">Economic Data</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/federal-reserve/" rel="tag">Federal Reserve</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/recession/" rel="tag">Recession</a></p><p><img alt="" hspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/09/fed.jpg" align="right" vspace="4" border="0" />With the Fed rumored to be contemplating a rare <a href="http://ap.google.com/article/ALeqM5jC0Js_XMSCt-GDAijc3qIbjuVZIAD8VFTEMG3">100 basis point rate cut</a>, it's worth considering whether this policy is doing any good. I'd say those rapid rate reductions are doing more harm. Here's why: non-stop interest rate cuts make business lose confidence in the Fed - since those cuts are ineffective - while signaling that economic conditions are desperately bad or that the Fed is panicking and unable to fix the problem.</p>
<p>I think the problem is that banks and other owners of Collateralized Debt Obligations (CDOs) and other asset backed securities have not accounted yet for the true loss in value of these securities. Therefore corporations and others that deal with the banks don't know whether those institutions are solvent. The solution would be to write down the value of those assets and then recapitalize the banks to the extent of the write downs.</p>
<p>While the non-stop interest rate cuts do not solve what's ailing the credit markets, they also accelerate inflation. This causes businesses to hoard their money because they expect that it will be worth less in the future. In effect, the Fed is creating very high inflationary expectations which creates a very high hurdle rate for investments - and in a slowing economic climate, there are not many investments that can earn a high enough return to get green-lighted.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/03/18/how-the-feds-rate-cuts-stifle-capital-investment/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>How the Fed's rate cuts stifle capital investment</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/03/18/how-the-feds-rate-cuts-stifle-capital-investment/">How the Fed's rate cuts stifle capital investment</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 18 Mar 2008 12:15:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/03/18/how-the-feds-rate-cuts-stifle-capital-investment/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1143051/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/03/18/how-the-feds-rate-cuts-stifle-capital-investment/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>CDOs</category><category>Collateralized Debt Obligations</category><category>CollateralizedDebtObligations</category><category>featured</category><category>Federal Reserve</category><category>FederalReserve</category><category>rate cut</category><category>RateCut</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Peter Cohan]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 18 Mar 2008 12:15:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Bernanke Call: As globe quakes, will Fed cut again?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/01/28/bernanke-call-as-globe-quakes-will-fed-cut-again/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/01/28/bernanke-call-as-globe-quakes-will-fed-cut-again/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/01/28/bernanke-call-as-globe-quakes-will-fed-cut-again/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/economic-data/" rel="tag">Economic Data</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/federal-reserve/" rel="tag">Federal Reserve</a></p><p><a href="http://www.nytimes.com/reuters/business/business-markets-global.html?ref=business">Reuters</a> reports that like last week, the global markets are cratering. The question is whether the Fed will come in with the same <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/01/22/feds-75-basis-point-emergency-rate-cut-smacks-of-desperation/">emergency 75-basis-point</a> rate cut it used last Tuesday when U.S. markets opened to damp the downturn. Here's the damage:</p>
<ul>
    <li>
    <div>The pan-European FTSEurofirst 300 was down 1.3%, taking January's losses close to 13%</div>
    </li>
    <li>
    <div>Nikkei dropping nearly 4%</div>
    </li>
</ul>
<p>In addition to the <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/01/24/what-the-stimulus-package-means-to-you/">$150 billion stimulus package</a>, the Fed is already expected to cut interest rates again this week; interest rate futures show the market is betting on another 25 or 50 basis points in cuts, possibly taking rates as low as 3.0%. </p>
<p>But with Dow futures down <a href="http://www.forbes.com/markets/feeds/afx/2008/01/28/afx4579912.html">57</a> at 7:15 a.m., it looks this morning like it's not enough -- the <strong><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/01/23/with-dow-futures-lower-the-bernanke-call-lives-on/">Bernanke Call</a></strong> -- investor's expectation that his rate cuts mark a ceiling below which the market will tumble -- appears alive and well. I wonder whether Bernanke will try another emergency rate cut this morning.</p>
<p><em>Peter Cohan is President of <a href="http://petercohan.com/">Peter S. Cohan &amp; Associates</a>. He also <a href="http://www3.babson.edu/Academics/Divisions/management/facultyprofile.cfm?pageid=391236">teaches management at Babson College</a> and edits <a href="http://petercohan.blogspot.com/2007/01/cohan-letter-up-15-in-2006.html">The Cohan Letter</a>.</em></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/01/28/bernanke-call-as-globe-quakes-will-fed-cut-again/">Bernanke Call: As globe quakes, will Fed cut again?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 28 Jan 2008 08:53:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/01/28/bernanke-call-as-globe-quakes-will-fed-cut-again/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1098996/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/01/28/bernanke-call-as-globe-quakes-will-fed-cut-again/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Bernanke Call</category><category>BernankeCall</category><category>Fed</category><category>Federal funds rate</category><category>Federal Reserve</category><category>FederalFundsRate</category><category>FederalReserve</category><category>interest rates</category><category>InterestRates</category><category>rate cut</category><category>RateCut</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Peter Cohan]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 28 Jan 2008 08:53:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Serious Money: The Fed will cut rates again -- what to do]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/01/22/serious-money-the-fed-will-cut-rates-again-what-to-do/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/01/22/serious-money-the-fed-will-cut-rates-again-what-to-do/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/01/22/serious-money-the-fed-will-cut-rates-again-what-to-do/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/major-movement/" rel="tag">Major Movement</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/forecasts/" rel="tag">Forecasts</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/rants-and-raves/" rel="tag">Rants and Raves</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/politics/" rel="tag">Politics</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/federal-reserve/" rel="tag">Federal Reserve</a></p><p>The Federal Reserve Board and Chairman Bernanke are not done cutting. Last week before departing on holiday I posted <a title="View Serious Money: 1% drop by Fed is possible on BloggingStocks" href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/01/16/serious-money-1-drop-by-fed-is-possible/" target="_blank">Serious Money: 1% drop by Fed is possible</a> and I awoke today to find that Ben is reading my posts. Today's cut is just the beginning. Today was the rough cut; next week <em>The Fed</em> will be sanding around the edges trying to smooth the markets out with possibly another quarter or even half a point cut.</p>
<p>What's the hurry you ask? I discussed that last week. The Fed needs six months for the impact to be felt by the overall economy, and more importantly, prior to us walking into the polling booths on election day. That means: cut now, polish later. You will be seeing and hearing the politicians all running in front of the parade come summer -- <em>count on it!</em></p>
<p>The banks and retailers are up solidly today as I write this because the cut will help banks in two ways. It will create more borrowing, and the latent rate reductions in "increased margin spreads" will mean higher short term profits. The retailers are up as speculators believe consumers will head back to the stores ... that may be premature.</p>
<p>This morning, the market has been extremely volatile, which personally is very ironic because I am writing this from the foot of the Arenal Volcano in Costa Rica.</p>
<p>If you want to buy into this market, the best way to do so is to dollar cost average into the index funds and ETFs. Read last weeks post - got to run...</p>
<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/05/24/about-the-stock-bloggers-sheldon-d-liber-aia/"><em>Sheldon Liber</em></a><em> is the CEO of a small private investment company and the principal for design and research at an architecture &amp; planning firm. </em><span class="news_story_title" style="FONT-STYLE: italic">Read his <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/chasing-value/">Chasing Value</a> and <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/serious-money/">Serious Money</a> columns.</span></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/01/22/serious-money-the-fed-will-cut-rates-again-what-to-do/">Serious Money: The Fed will cut rates again -- what to do</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 22 Jan 2008 14:45:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://federal%20reserve/>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href=http://citigroup%20inc.%20(c)/>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href=http://sheldon%20liber/>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href=http://politics/>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/01/22/serious-money-the-fed-will-cut-rates-again-what-to-do/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1093268/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/01/22/serious-money-the-fed-will-cut-rates-again-what-to-do/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>federal reserve</category><category>FederalReserve</category><category>inthenews</category><category>rate cut</category><category>RateCut</category><category>Sheldon Liber</category><category>SheldonLiber</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Sheldon Liber]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 22 Jan 2008 14:45:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[When a 200-point plunge causes a sigh of relief (of sorts)]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/01/22/when-a-200-point-plunge-causes-a-sigh-of-relief/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/01/22/when-a-200-point-plunge-causes-a-sigh-of-relief/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/01/22/when-a-200-point-plunge-causes-a-sigh-of-relief/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/hd/" rel="tag">Home Depot (HD)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/marketmatters/" rel="tag">Market Matters</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/jpm/" rel="tag">JPMorgan Chase (JPM)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/bbby/" rel="tag">Bed Bath and Beyond (BBBY)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/mer/" rel="tag">Merrill Lynch (MER)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/shld/" rel="tag">Sears Holdings (SHLD)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/kss/" rel="tag">Kohl's Corp (KSS)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/jwn/" rel="tag">Nordstrom, Inc (JWN)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/federal-reserve/" rel="tag">Federal Reserve</a></p>The Dow Jones Industrial Average has started off as much as 464 points at the open but has been rebounding since. Even at the time that I've been writing this post, the Dow narrowed its decline from about 200 points to almost 100 points. When investors have been fearing since yesterday a 500 point free-fall, they collectively sigh at a 200 point drop.<br /><br />Naturally, the Federal Reserve's rate cut of 75 basis points helped cushion the blow. Futures have indeed started rebounding immediately after the announcement. But what's interesting is the reaction this move caused. Financials, home builders and retailers are rebounding, with some financials and retailers being among today's best performers. Some financials like <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/jp-morgan-chase-and-co/jpm/nys">JPMorgan Chase</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/jp-morgan-chase-and-co/jpm/nys">JPM</a>) and <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/merrill-lynch-and-co-inc/mer/nys?tabs=quotesandnews">Merrill Lynch</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/merrill-lynch-and-co-inc/mer/nys?tabs=quotesandnews">MER</a>) are up over 3% and 3.6% respectively.<br /><br />So you might say, financials I can understand. They've written down losses, their shares have declined markedly and with today's Fed cut, that could mean they've bottomed. But retailers? Hasn't everybody been talking about the consumers not having money and cutting spending? Especially come time of reset on their mortgages?<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/01/22/when-a-200-point-plunge-causes-a-sigh-of-relief/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>When a 200-point plunge causes a sigh of relief (of sorts)</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/01/22/when-a-200-point-plunge-causes-a-sigh-of-relief/">When a 200-point plunge causes a sigh of relief (of sorts)</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 22 Jan 2008 11:55:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/01/22/when-a-200-point-plunge-causes-a-sigh-of-relief/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1093116/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/01/22/when-a-200-point-plunge-causes-a-sigh-of-relief/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>bbby</category><category>federal reserve</category><category>FederalReserve</category><category>hd</category><category>inthenews</category><category>jpm</category><category>mer</category><category>rate cut</category><category>RateCut</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Melly Alazraki]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 22 Jan 2008 11:55:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Weekly inventory report pushes oil prices even lower]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/11/28/weekly-inventory-report-pushes-oil-prices-even-lower/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/11/28/weekly-inventory-report-pushes-oil-prices-even-lower/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/11/28/weekly-inventory-report-pushes-oil-prices-even-lower/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/major-movement/" rel="tag">Major Movement</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/international-markets/" rel="tag">International Markets</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/forecasts/" rel="tag">Forecasts</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/products-and-services/" rel="tag">Products and Services</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/consumer-experience/" rel="tag">Consumer Experience</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/middle-east/" rel="tag">Middle East</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/oil/" rel="tag">Oil</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/federal-reserve/" rel="tag">Federal Reserve</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/11/falling-oil.gif" />It is hard to believe that just two days ago we were sitting here wondering if Monday would be the day we saw $100 a barrel for oil. Prices have been falling all week, and are moving sharply lower today following a <a target="_blank" href="http://money.aol.com/news/articles/_a/oil-drops-below-92-on-inventory-report/n20071128114509990017">bearish inventory report from the US Department of Energy</a>.<br /><br />Today's report showed that last week oil inventories fell by 400,000 barrels. I have found two conflicting reports online where one showed analysts polled by Dow Jones were expecting to see a 500,000 barrel drop, and another article showed analysts expecting the <a href="http://money.aol.com/news/articles/_a/oil-drops-on-economy-fears-supply-view/n20071127103709990009">400,000 barrel decrease</a> that we did see. Either way, the main point is that inventories did not drop more than expected, which is what is pushing prices lower.<br /><br />Prices had already been showing signs of weakness earlier in the day on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/11/28/oil-prices-still-weaker-on-opec-output-rumors/">mixed messages from OPEC</a>, and all week traders have been pushing prices lower on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/11/27/oil-continues-its-retreat-on-economic-concerns/">fears of an economic slowdown</a>.<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/11/28/weekly-inventory-report-pushes-oil-prices-even-lower/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Weekly inventory report pushes oil prices even lower</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/11/28/weekly-inventory-report-pushes-oil-prices-even-lower/">Weekly inventory report pushes oil prices even lower</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 28 Nov 2007 13:25:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://money.aol.com/news/articles/_a/oil-drops-below-92-on-inventory-report/n20071128114509990017>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/11/28/weekly-inventory-report-pushes-oil-prices-even-lower/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1049965/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/11/28/weekly-inventory-report-pushes-oil-prices-even-lower/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>$100 oil</category><category>$100Oil</category><category>featured</category><category>Fed</category><category>Federal Reserve</category><category>FederalReserve</category><category>interest rates</category><category>InterestRates</category><category>inthenews</category><category>oil</category><category>oil prices</category><category>oil production</category><category>OilPrices</category><category>OilProduction</category><category>OPEC</category><category>rate cut</category><category>RateCut</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Michael Fowlkes]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 28 Nov 2007 13:25:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[The FOMC Halloween decision: No tricks here]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/10/31/the-fomc-halloween-decision-no-tricks-here/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/10/31/the-fomc-halloween-decision-no-tricks-here/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/10/31/the-fomc-halloween-decision-no-tricks-here/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/major-movement/" rel="tag">Major Movement</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/good-news/" rel="tag">Good news</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/press-releases/" rel="tag">Press Releases</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/indices/" rel="tag">Indices</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/mandftoday/" rel="tag">Money and Finance Today</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/economic-data/" rel="tag">Economic Data</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/headline-news/" rel="tag">Headline News</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/federal-reserve/" rel="tag">Federal Reserve</a></p><p>The Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC) decided to lower its Federal Funds Rate target by 25 basis points to 4 &amp;frac12;% and to lower the Discount Rate by 25 basis points to 5%. The decision to lower the Fed Funds Rate had one dissent, and the Discount Rate decision was unanimous.</p>
<p>The Fed left open the possibility of additional interest rate cuts but gave no indication of future action. It also mentioned the improvement in core inflation and the equal balance between upside risks to inflation versus the downside risks to growth.</p>
<p>The primary concern with current Fed actions is that Chairman Bernanke will get caught behind the curve since Fed actions can take several months to a year to take effect. The GDP report this morning indicated that the economy may be more resilient than many believe. Core inflation for the moment also appears to be less of a problem.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/10/31/the-fomc-halloween-decision-no-tricks-here/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>The FOMC Halloween decision: No tricks here</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/10/31/the-fomc-halloween-decision-no-tricks-here/">The FOMC Halloween decision: No tricks here</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 31 Oct 2007 17:20:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/10/31/the-fomc-halloween-decision-no-tricks-here/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1026548/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/10/31/the-fomc-halloween-decision-no-tricks-here/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Ben Bernanke</category><category>BenBernanke</category><category>fed</category><category>Federal reserve</category><category>FederalReserve</category><category>Halloween decision</category><category>HalloweenDecision</category><category>interest rates</category><category>InterestRates</category><category>inthenews</category><category>rate cut</category><category>RateCut</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Douglas S. Roberts]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 31 Oct 2007 17:20:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Flash : Fed cuts rates by 25 basis points]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/10/31/flash-fed-cuts-rates-by-25-basis-points/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/10/31/flash-fed-cuts-rates-by-25-basis-points/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/10/31/flash-fed-cuts-rates-by-25-basis-points/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/consumer-experience/" rel="tag">Consumer Experience</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/federal-reserve/" rel="tag">Federal Reserve</a></p>As expected the Federal Reserve announced a few minutes ago that it had indeed decided to cut rates by the expected 25 basis points.<br /><br />In addition to the interest rate cut, the Fed also stated that inflation growth risks are roughly balanced. The interest rate cut was approved by a 9 to 1 vote.<br /><br /><em><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/bloggers/michael-fowlkes/">Michael Fowlkes</a> has worked as a stock trader for seven years and spent the last two years working as an analyst for the online investment advisory service <a href="http://www.iotogo.com/aolblog_mf">Investor's Observer</a>.</em><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/10/31/flash-fed-cuts-rates-by-25-basis-points/">Flash : Fed cuts rates by 25 basis points</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 31 Oct 2007 14:18:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/10/31/flash-fed-cuts-rates-by-25-basis-points/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1026510/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/10/31/flash-fed-cuts-rates-by-25-basis-points/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Federal Reserve</category><category>FederalReserve</category><category>inflation</category><category>interest rate</category><category>InterestRate</category><category>rate cut</category><category>RateCut</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Michael Fowlkes]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 31 Oct 2007 14:18:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[What can we expect from yesterday's rate cuts?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/09/19/what-can-we-expect-from-yesterdays-rate-cuts/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/09/19/what-can-we-expect-from-yesterdays-rate-cuts/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/09/19/what-can-we-expect-from-yesterdays-rate-cuts/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/good-news/" rel="tag">Good news</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/marketmatters/" rel="tag">Market Matters</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/mandftoday/" rel="tag">Money and Finance Today</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/djia/" rel="tag">DJIA</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/housing/" rel="tag">Housing</a></p>As you probably already know, the Fed surprised the market yesterday with a 50 basis point cut in short-term interest rates. Most investors had been expecting a 25 basis point cut, so yesterday's news <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/09/18/dow-rallies-336-points-on-interest-rate-cut/">sent the market soaring</a>. Aside from rising stocks in the short run, <a href="http://money.aol.com/news/articles/_a/what-the-fed-rate-cut-means-for-you/20070919071209990001">what can we really expect to gain</a> from yesterday's cut?<br /><br />While many people are thinking that yesterday's cuts will help homeowners struggling to keep up with their mortgages, the sad fact is that this may not turn out to be the case. One of the more troubling trends that we have been seeing recently is the <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/09/18/foreclosures-continue-to-mount/">mass rise in foreclosures</a> across the country. The majority of these foreclosures are happening to homeowners who bought their homes with adjustable interest rate loans. Sadly, these borrowers may see little relief from yesterday's Fed decision.<br /><br />The reason why adjustable rate mortgage holders will not benefit from the cuts is that the majority of these loans are not tied to U.S. interest rates, but instead are tied to the London interbank offered rate, or Libor. And Libor is still sitting well above the Fed funds rates.<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/09/19/what-can-we-expect-from-yesterdays-rate-cuts/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>What can we expect from yesterday's rate cuts?</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/09/19/what-can-we-expect-from-yesterdays-rate-cuts/">What can we expect from yesterday's rate cuts?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 19 Sep 2007 11:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://money.aol.com/news/articles/_a/what-the-fed-rate-cut-means-for-you/20070919071209990001>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/09/19/what-can-we-expect-from-yesterdays-rate-cuts/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/993120/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/09/19/what-can-we-expect-from-yesterdays-rate-cuts/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>housing</category><category>interest rates</category><category>InterestRates</category><category>James Bianco</category><category>JamesBianco</category><category>Libor</category><category>rate cut</category><category>RateCut</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Michael Fowlkes]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 19 Sep 2007 11:00:00 EST</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
