<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd">
<channel>
<title>BloggingStocks</title>
<link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com</link>
<description>BloggingStocks</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Johnson &amp; Johnson Recalling Children's Benadryl and Motrin]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/11/23/johnson-and-johnson-recalling-childrens-benadryl-and-motrin/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/11/23/johnson-and-johnson-recalling-childrens-benadryl-and-motrin/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/11/23/johnson-and-johnson-recalling-childrens-benadryl-and-motrin/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/bad-news/" rel="tag">Bad News</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/jnj/" rel="tag">Johnson and Johnson (JNJ)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/analysis/" rel="tag">Technical Analysis</a></p><p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2010/04/jnj-logo.jpg" alt="" />New Jersey-based pharmaceutical giant Johnson &amp; Johnson (<a target="_blank" href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/johnson-and-johnson/jnj/nys">JNJ</a>) is <a target="_blank" href="http://www.nasdaq.com/aspx/stock-market-news-story.aspx?storyid=201011221805dowjonesdjonline000296&amp;title=jj-recalls-4-million-packages-of-childrens-benadryl">recalling</a> roughly 4 million packages of children's Benadryl Allergy Fastmelt Tablets (cherry and grape flavor) tablets and 800,000 bottles of 24-count Junior Strength Motrin. </p>
<p>The company blamed the recall on "insufficiencies" in the manufacturing process of the two medications, the Dow Jones reported. JNJ said that the recalls are taking place on the wholesale and retail levels, and that consumers can continue to use these products if they are in the medicine cabinet.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/11/23/johnson-and-johnson-recalling-childrens-benadryl-and-motrin/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Johnson &amp; Johnson Recalling Children's Benadryl and Motrin</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/11/23/johnson-and-johnson-recalling-childrens-benadryl-and-motrin/">Johnson &amp; Johnson Recalling Children's Benadryl and Motrin</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 23 Nov 2010 10:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/11/23/johnson-and-johnson-recalling-childrens-benadryl-and-motrin/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19730211/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/11/23/johnson-and-johnson-recalling-childrens-benadryl-and-motrin/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>benadryl</category><category>featured</category><category>inthenews</category><category>JNJ</category><category>medicine</category><category>medicine recall</category><category>motrin</category><category>OTC medicines</category><category>recall</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark Fightmaster]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 23 Nov 2010 10:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Coca-Cola Recalls 88,000 Drinking Glasses]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/11/22/coca-cola-recalls-88-000-drinking-glasses/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/11/22/coca-cola-recalls-88-000-drinking-glasses/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/11/22/coca-cola-recalls-88-000-drinking-glasses/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/products-and-services/" rel="tag">Products and Services</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/consumer-experience/" rel="tag">Consumer Experience</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/ko/" rel="tag">Coca-Cola (KO)</a></p><p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="right" alt="Coca Cola Drinking Glass Recall" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2009/11/red_coca-cola_logo.jpg" />Soft drink giant The Coca-Cola Company (<a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/the-coca-cola-company/ko/nys" class="inlinked">KO</a>) announced today that it had recalled <a href="http://www.thecoca-colacompany.com/contactus/glass/">22,000 sets of themed glasses</a> that were painted to look like cans of the company's soft drinks.</p>
<p>The 16-ounce glasses have been sold since March both online and in retail stores, but have been detected to contain low levels of cadmium on the outside of the glass which has been painted to look like a can of Coke.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/11/22/coca-cola-recalls-88-000-drinking-glasses/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Coca-Cola Recalls 88,000 Drinking Glasses</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/11/22/coca-cola-recalls-88-000-drinking-glasses/">Coca-Cola Recalls 88,000 Drinking Glasses</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 22 Nov 2010 16:30:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/11/22/coca-cola-recalls-88-000-drinking-glasses/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19729171/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/11/22/coca-cola-recalls-88-000-drinking-glasses/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Coca-Cola</category><category>coke</category><category>coke glasses</category><category>inthenews</category><category>KO</category><category>recall</category><category>soft drinks</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Michael Fowlkes]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 22 Nov 2010 16:30:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Graco Recalls 2 Million Strollers]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/10/21/graco-recall-earnings/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/10/21/graco-recall-earnings/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/10/21/graco-recall-earnings/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/earnings-reports/" rel="tag">Earnings Reports</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/bad-news/" rel="tag">Bad News</a></p><p><img hspace="4" vspace="4" border="1" align="right" alt="Graco (GGG) logo"  src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2010/10/gracologo.jpg" />Graco (<a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/graco-inc/ggg/nys" class="inlinked">GGG</a>), which manufactures children's products, <a href="http://www.gracobaby.com/SafetyAndRecall/Pages/SafetyAndRecallArticle.aspx?recallID=38&amp;page=SafetyAndRecall">recalled 2 million strollers</a> Wednesday because they can cause strangulation to children under 12 months of age. The action includes Quattro Tour models made before November 2006 and MetroLite strollers and travel systems made before July 2007. </p>
<p>Graco said that children can slip through the space between the tray and seat when they are not harnessed. The company reported that the problem has caused nine injuries, but four deaths have apparently been tied to the strollers as well. The deaths occurred <a href="http://www.webmd.com/parenting/baby/news/20101020/4-baby-deaths-spur-graco-stroller-recall">between 2003 and 2005</a>, according to <em>Consumer Reports</em>. Graco is urging consumers to stop using the products immediately and contact the company for a free repair set. Graco has <a href="http://www.gracobaby.com/SafetyAndRecall/Pages/SafetyAndRecallArticle.aspx?recallID=38&amp;page=SafetyAndRecall">listed the products</a> involved at its website.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/10/21/graco-recall-earnings/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Graco Recalls 2 Million Strollers</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/10/21/graco-recall-earnings/">Graco Recalls 2 Million Strollers</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 21 Oct 2010 10:30:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/10/21/graco-recall-earnings/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19683189/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/10/21/graco-recall-earnings/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>crib recall</category><category>GGG</category><category>Graco</category><category>Graco recall</category><category>inthenews</category><category>recall</category><category>stroller recall</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Douglas McIntyre]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 21 Oct 2010 10:30:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Johnson &amp; Johnson, the FDA and a Phantom Recall]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/09/22/johnson-and-johnson-the-fda-and-a-phantom-recall/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/09/22/johnson-and-johnson-the-fda-and-a-phantom-recall/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/09/22/johnson-and-johnson-the-fda-and-a-phantom-recall/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/jnj/" rel="tag">Johnson and Johnson (JNJ)</a></p><p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2010/04/jnj-logo.jpg" alt="Johnson &amp; Johnson (JNJ) logo" />Reportedly, a U.S. House committee found a bit more about Johnson &amp; Johnson (<a target="_blank" href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/johnson-and-johnson/jnj/nys">JNJ</a>) recalls than it wanted during a recent investigation into last year's recalls. Remember, Johnson &amp; Johnson had a massive recall of some of its over-the-counter (OTC) medicines.</p>
<p>Turns out that the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform announced Tuesday that it obtained an e-mail highlighting an agreement between the FDA and Johnson &amp; Johnson that would allow the company to "<a target="_blank" href="http://www.reuters.com/article/idUSN2119014920100922?feedType=RSS&amp;feedName=companyNews&amp;rpc=33">conduct an unpublicized recall of adult Motrin</a>." Motrin is produced by Johnson &amp; Johnson's McNeil consumer medicines, and this is the unit that was allowed to carry out the "phantom recall."</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/09/22/johnson-and-johnson-the-fda-and-a-phantom-recall/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Johnson &amp; Johnson, the FDA and a Phantom Recall</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/09/22/johnson-and-johnson-the-fda-and-a-phantom-recall/">Johnson &amp; Johnson, the FDA and a Phantom Recall</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 22 Sep 2010 11:10:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/09/22/johnson-and-johnson-the-fda-and-a-phantom-recall/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19643961/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/09/22/johnson-and-johnson-the-fda-and-a-phantom-recall/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>FDA</category><category>inthenews</category><category>JNJ</category><category>Johnson Johnson</category><category>medicine</category><category>medicine recall</category><category>recall</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark Fightmaster]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 22 Sep 2010 11:10:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Johnson &amp; Johnson Recalling Contact Lenses in Asia and Europe]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/08/24/johnson-and-johnson-recalling-contact-lenses-in-asia-and-europe/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/08/24/johnson-and-johnson-recalling-contact-lenses-in-asia-and-europe/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/08/24/johnson-and-johnson-recalling-contact-lenses-in-asia-and-europe/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/products-and-services/" rel="tag">Products and Services</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/jnj/" rel="tag">Johnson and Johnson (JNJ)</a></p><p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" align="right" alt="Johnson &amp; Johnson (JNJ) logo" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2010/04/jnj-logo.jpg" />Johnson &amp; Johnson (<a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/johnson-and-johnson/jnj/nys" target="_blank">JNJ</a>) announced Monday that it is <a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/story/company-news/johnson-and-johnson-acuvue-contact-lenses-recall/19605177/" target="_blank">recalling 1-Day Acuvue contact lenses</a> sold mainly in Japan and other countries in Asia and Europe. None of the recalled contact lenses were sold in the U.S. or in Canada.</p>
<p>The company said that it received a "limited number" of complaints from Japanese customers of unusual stinging or pain when inserting the Acuvue lenses. The recall started on August 18 and was not immediately announced in the U.S. </p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/08/24/johnson-and-johnson-recalling-contact-lenses-in-asia-and-europe/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Johnson &amp; Johnson Recalling Contact Lenses in Asia and Europe</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/08/24/johnson-and-johnson-recalling-contact-lenses-in-asia-and-europe/">Johnson &amp; Johnson Recalling Contact Lenses in Asia and Europe</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 24 Aug 2010 10:15:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/08/24/johnson-and-johnson-recalling-contact-lenses-in-asia-and-europe/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19605712/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/08/24/johnson-and-johnson-recalling-contact-lenses-in-asia-and-europe/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>contact lenses</category><category>contacts</category><category>inthenews</category><category>Johnson and Johnson</category><category>product recall</category><category>recall</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark Fightmaster]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 24 Aug 2010 10:15:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Toyota Recalls More Cars Due to Steering Problems]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/07/29/toyota-recall/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/07/29/toyota-recall/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/07/29/toyota-recall/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/tm/" rel="tag">Toyota Motor Corp. (TM)</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" alt="Toyota recalls more cars" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2010/01/black-toyota-logo.jpg" />Toyota (<a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/toyota-motor-corporation/tm/nys" target="_blank">TM</a>) is going to recall 412,000 cars in the U.S. to <a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/idUSTRE66S1KR20100729" target="_blank">fix steering problems</a>, according to Reuters. The report notes that 373,000 of the automobiles are Avalon sedans from the 2000 through 2004 model years and 39,000 are LX470 SUVs from model years 2003 through 2007. The automaker announced that the steering lock bar in the Avalon could break "under certain conditions," while the LX470s are being recalled to "eliminate the risk of steering shaft disengagement."<br />
<br />
The company said that it has received three accident reports involving the Avalon and none involving the LX470. Nevertheless, the automaker is trying to fix these problems, which are the latest in a series of recalls this year.<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/07/29/toyota-recall/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Toyota Recalls More Cars Due to Steering Problems</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/07/29/toyota-recall/">Toyota Recalls More Cars Due to Steering Problems</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 29 Jul 2010 09:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/07/29/toyota-recall/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19573161/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/07/29/toyota-recall/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>auto</category><category>auto recall</category><category>automobile</category><category>autos</category><category>featured</category><category>inthenews</category><category>recall</category><category>Toyota</category><category>toyota recall</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark Fightmaster]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2010 09:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Nissan Recalling Cubes Because of Fuel Leak]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/07/26/nissan-recalling-cubes-because-of-fuel-leak/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/07/26/nissan-recalling-cubes-because-of-fuel-leak/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/07/26/nissan-recalling-cubes-because-of-fuel-leak/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/nsany/" rel="tag">Nissan Motors (NSANY)</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2010/03/nissan-logo-1268839572.jpg" />Reportedly, Nissan (<a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/nissan-motor-ltd-s-adr/nsany/nao" target="_blank">NSAN</a>Y) is <a href="http://www.marketwatch.com/story/nissan-recalling-about-46000-cubes-in-us-2010-07-26-1057250" target="_blank">recalling</a> roughly 46,000 of its 2009 - 2010 Cubes in the United States because of non-compliance with federal motor vehicle safety standards. According to the automaker, a fuel leak developed during crash tests. This leak could result in a fire, according to the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration. Nissan said that when "the vehicle was rotated following a rear moving barrier crash test as required, the amount of fuel leakage exceeded the allowable limits." <p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/07/26/nissan-recalling-cubes-because-of-fuel-leak/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Nissan Recalling Cubes Because of Fuel Leak</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/07/26/nissan-recalling-cubes-because-of-fuel-leak/">Nissan Recalling Cubes Because of Fuel Leak</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 26 Jul 2010 15:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/07/26/nissan-recalling-cubes-because-of-fuel-leak/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19568668/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/07/26/nissan-recalling-cubes-because-of-fuel-leak/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>auto</category><category>auto recall</category><category>autos</category><category>Cube</category><category>inthenews</category><category>Nissan</category><category>recall</category><category>recalls</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark Fightmaster]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 26 Jul 2010 15:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[McDonald's Recalls Collectible Shrek Glasses]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/06/04/mcdonalds-recalls-shrek-glasses/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/06/04/mcdonalds-recalls-shrek-glasses/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/06/04/mcdonalds-recalls-shrek-glasses/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/mcd/" rel="tag">McDonald's (MCD)</a></p><p><img hspace="4" border="1" align="right" vspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.dailyfinance.com/media/2010/06/shrek240.jpg" alt="" />Reportedly, McDonald's (<a target="_blank" href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/mcdonald-s-corporation/mcd/nys">MCD</a>) is recalling 12 million of its collectible <em>Shrek</em> glasses thanks to cadmium. The U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC) announced the voluntary recall early this morning because the <a target="_blank" href="http://www.aolnews.com/story/mcdonalds-pulls-cadmium-tainted-shrek/1098493">painted design contains cadmium</a>.</p>
<p>What a deal, cadmium poisoning and a collector's glass all for a mere $2 ... those marketing geniuses at McDonald's ... what will they think of next?</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/06/04/mcdonalds-recalls-shrek-glasses/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>McDonald's Recalls Collectible Shrek Glasses</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/06/04/mcdonalds-recalls-shrek-glasses/">McDonald's Recalls Collectible Shrek Glasses</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 04 Jun 2010 10:20:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/06/04/mcdonalds-recalls-shrek-glasses/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19503461/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/06/04/mcdonalds-recalls-shrek-glasses/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>cadmium</category><category>consumer</category><category>featured</category><category>inthenews</category><category>McDonalds</category><category>recall</category><category>Shrek</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark Fightmaster]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 04 Jun 2010 10:20:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[The Lexus GX 460 Is Back on the Market]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/04/29/the-lexus-gx-460-is-back-on-the-market/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/04/29/the-lexus-gx-460-is-back-on-the-market/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/04/29/the-lexus-gx-460-is-back-on-the-market/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/good-news/" rel="tag">Good news</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/products-and-services/" rel="tag">Products and Services</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/consumer-experience/" rel="tag">Consumer Experience</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/competitive-strategy/" rel="tag">Competitive Strategy</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/tm/" rel="tag">Toyota Motor Corp. (TM)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/japan/" rel="tag">Japan</a></p><img hspace="4" border="0" align="right" vspace="4" style="width: 271px; height: 168px;" alt="lexus gsx 400" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2010/04/lexus.jpg" />Earlier this month Toyota Motor Company (<a class="inlinked" href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/toyota-motor-corporation/tm/nys">TM</a>) was forced to <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/04/14/toyota-suspends-sale-of-lexus-suv-over-safety-concerns/">halt sales of its Lexus GX 460</a> after it received a "Don't Buy" rating from <em>Consumer Reports</em>, but the company announced today that the problem has been fixed, and <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2010/04/30/business/global/30toyota.html?src=busln">it had resumed U.S. sales</a>.<br />
<br />
The problem with the SUVs involved the vehicles electronic stabilizer, which was unable to adequately correct the SUV when sliding out in corners.<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/04/29/the-lexus-gx-460-is-back-on-the-market/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>The Lexus GX 460 Is Back on the Market</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/04/29/the-lexus-gx-460-is-back-on-the-market/">The Lexus GX 460 Is Back on the Market</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 29 Apr 2010 16:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/04/29/the-lexus-gx-460-is-back-on-the-market/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19459211/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/04/29/the-lexus-gx-460-is-back-on-the-market/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>auto</category><category>auto sales</category><category>autos</category><category>gsx 400</category><category>inthenews</category><category>japan</category><category>recall</category><category>sequoia</category><category>SUVs</category><category>tm</category><category>toyota</category><category>toyota recalls</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Michael Fowlkes]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 29 Apr 2010 16:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[More Recalls Involving Toyota SUVs]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/04/29/more-recalls-involving-toyota-suvs/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/04/29/more-recalls-involving-toyota-suvs/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/04/29/more-recalls-involving-toyota-suvs/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/products-and-services/" rel="tag">Products and Services</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/consumer-experience/" rel="tag">Consumer Experience</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/tm/" rel="tag">Toyota Motor Corp. (TM)</a></p><img hspace="4" border="0" align="right" vspace="4" alt="Toyota Sequoia Safety Recall" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2010/01/black-toyota-logo.jpg" />Toyota Motor (<a class="inlinked" href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/toyota-motor-corporation/tm/nys">TM</a>) was back in the news Wednesday with <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2010/04/29/business/29toyota.html?src=mv">additional recalls</a>. This time the recall involves its Sequoia sports utility vehicle due to concerns regarding the stability control on the 2003 model year. This is the <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/04/17/toyota-recalls-sienna-minivans/">second time this month</a> that the company has recalled some of its SUVs.<br />
<br />
The back's stability control system is supposed to correct a loss of traction in the front or rear tires when the SUV enters a corner. There have been reports that the system activated when the vehicle was moving at slow speed and resulted in drivers not being able to accelerate, and in some cases the brakes coming on and slowing the SUV down unexpectedly.<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/04/29/more-recalls-involving-toyota-suvs/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>More Recalls Involving Toyota SUVs</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/04/29/more-recalls-involving-toyota-suvs/">More Recalls Involving Toyota SUVs</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 29 Apr 2010 09:30:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/04/29/more-recalls-involving-toyota-suvs/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19458069/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/04/29/more-recalls-involving-toyota-suvs/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>featured</category><category>inthenews</category><category>Japan</category><category>recall</category><category>safety</category><category>safety recall</category><category>Sequoia</category><category>Sienna</category><category>SUVs</category><category>TM</category><category>Toyota</category><category>Toyota recall</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Michael Fowlkes]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 29 Apr 2010 09:30:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Honda Catches the Toyota Brake Recall Flu]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/03/17/honda-catches-the-toyota-brake-recall-flu/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/03/17/honda-catches-the-toyota-brake-recall-flu/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/03/17/honda-catches-the-toyota-brake-recall-flu/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/products-and-services/" rel="tag">Products and Services</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/industry/" rel="tag">Industry</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/tm/" rel="tag">Toyota Motor Corp. (TM)</a></p><img hspace="4" border="1" align="right" vspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2010/03/hondalogo.jpg"  alt="" />It should come as a surprise to no one that there has arrived yet another auto industry recall, similar to the ones recently experienced by Toyota Motor Corp (<a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/toyota-motor-corporation/tm/nys">TM</a>). <a href="http://www.rttnews.com/Content/GeneralNews.aspx?Node=B1&amp;Id=1242654">According to RTTNews</a>, over 400,000 cars produced by Honda Motors LTD (<a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/honda-motor-co-ltd-honda-giken-kogyo-kabushiki-kaisha-japan/hmc/nys">HMC</a>) are being recalled for braking issues.<br />
<br />
Honda owners are complaining that the brake pedals in their cars have become soft and low-riding over time. Honda Motors has attributed the problem to the vehicle stability assist modulator, stating that an accumulation of air is causing the problem.<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/03/17/honda-catches-the-toyota-brake-recall-flu/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Honda Catches the Toyota Brake Recall Flu</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/03/17/honda-catches-the-toyota-brake-recall-flu/">Honda Catches the Toyota Brake Recall Flu</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 17 Mar 2010 12:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.rttnews.com/Content/GeneralNews.aspx?Node=B1&amp;Id=1242654>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/03/17/honda-catches-the-toyota-brake-recall-flu/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19402515/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/03/17/honda-catches-the-toyota-brake-recall-flu/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>brakes</category><category>Honda</category><category>Honda Motor LTD</category><category>recall</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Gary Sattler]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 17 Mar 2010 12:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Toyota Faces More Recall Issues]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/03/04/toyota-faces-more-recall-issues/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/03/04/toyota-faces-more-recall-issues/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/03/04/toyota-faces-more-recall-issues/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/tm/" rel="tag">Toyota Motor Corp. (TM)</a></p><p><img hspace="4" vspace="4" border="1" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2010/01/black-toyota-logo.jpg" />According to the U.S. Department of Transportation, some of the recalled and repaired Toyota (<a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/toyota-motor-corporation/tm/nys" target="_blank">TM</a>) cars <a href="http://www.marketwatch.com/story/us-probes-toyota-repairs-to-recalled-cars-wsj-2010-03-03?dist=beforebell" target="_blank">may be having more issues</a>. Supposedly, some of the cars that have already been repaired are now having a problem with sudden acceleration. This problem has been reported in either 15 or 10 drivers (depending on which article you read), but it's enough to cause a bit of a stir.</p>
<p>The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHSTA), which received the complaints, said that it wants to know about any further acceleration problems in Toyota vehicles. According to the Associated Press, Toyota is investigating the matter but is confident about the recall repairs it made.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/03/04/toyota-faces-more-recall-issues/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Toyota Faces More Recall Issues</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/03/04/toyota-faces-more-recall-issues/">Toyota Faces More Recall Issues</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 04 Mar 2010 11:20:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/03/04/toyota-faces-more-recall-issues/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19382981/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/03/04/toyota-faces-more-recall-issues/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>featured</category><category>inthenews</category><category>NHSTA</category><category>recall</category><category>TM</category><category>toyota</category><category>toyota accelerator</category><category>toyota recall</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark Fightmaster]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 04 Mar 2010 11:20:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Toyota Accused of Withholding Test Data]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/02/26/toyota-accused-of-withholding-test-data/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/02/26/toyota-accused-of-withholding-test-data/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/02/26/toyota-accused-of-withholding-test-data/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/products-and-services/" rel="tag">Products and Services</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/law/" rel="tag">Law</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/tm/" rel="tag">Toyota Motor Corp. (TM)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/scandals/" rel="tag">Scandals</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/japan/" rel="tag">Japan</a></p><img hspace="4" vspace="4" border="0" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/05/toyotapic.jpg" alt="toyota recall crisis" />Toyota Motor Company (<a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/toyota-motor-corporation/tm/nys">TM</a>) continues to find itself in arguably the biggest crisis in the auto maker's history, and today <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2010/02/27/business/27toyota.html?ref=business">more accusations were made against the company</a>. The company is back in the news today with accusations that Toyota tried to hide data in lawsuits filed by Toyota drivers injured in crashes.<br />
<br />
The accusation came from New York Democrat, Edolphus Towns. Towns stated that the company deliberately shielded some of its design and testing data, and in many instances settled lawsuits in order to avoid turning over the information.<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/02/26/toyota-accused-of-withholding-test-data/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Toyota Accused of Withholding Test Data</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/02/26/toyota-accused-of-withholding-test-data/">Toyota Accused of Withholding Test Data</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 26 Feb 2010 18:30:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/02/26/toyota-accused-of-withholding-test-data/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19375755/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/02/26/toyota-accused-of-withholding-test-data/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>congress</category><category>Edolphus Towns</category><category>featured</category><category>inthenews</category><category>law</category><category>lawsuits</category><category>legal</category><category>recall</category><category>scandal</category><category>tm</category><category>toyota</category><category>toyota recall</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Michael Fowlkes]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 26 Feb 2010 18:30:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Toyota Official Testifies That Recall May Not Totally Fix Problems]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/02/23/toyota-official-testifies-that-recall-may-not-totally-fix-proble/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/02/23/toyota-official-testifies-that-recall-may-not-totally-fix-proble/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/02/23/toyota-official-testifies-that-recall-may-not-totally-fix-proble/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/international-markets/" rel="tag">International Markets</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/from-the-boards/" rel="tag">From the Boards</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/products-and-services/" rel="tag">Products and Services</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/consumer-experience/" rel="tag">Consumer Experience</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/tm/" rel="tag">Toyota Motor Corp. (TM)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/scandals/" rel="tag">Scandals</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/japan/" rel="tag">Japan</a></p><img hspace="4" vspace="4" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2010/01/black-toyota-logo.jpg"  alt="" />The recent massive safety recalls by <a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/tm/nys">Toyota Motor Company</a> (TM) have definitely hurt the company's image, and the uncertainty over the current safety of its vehicles has left many people wondering what exactly is going on with the Toyota recall. If people were concerned before, they are sure to be a bit more confused after a Toyota executive testified in front of the House Energy and Commerce Committee today that <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2010/02/24/business/global/24toyota.html?hp">the recall may not "totally solve" the current problems</a>.<br />
<br />
Last week Toyota's president, Akio Toyoda, was asked to come before Congress and testify over the current safety recalls. Mr. Toyoda will answer questions tomorrow, but today it was James E. Lentz III, the president of Toyota Motor Sales U.S.A., that had his chance to answer questions in front of Congress.<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/02/23/toyota-official-testifies-that-recall-may-not-totally-fix-proble/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Toyota Official Testifies That Recall May Not Totally Fix Problems</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/02/23/toyota-official-testifies-that-recall-may-not-totally-fix-proble/">Toyota Official Testifies That Recall May Not Totally Fix Problems</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 23 Feb 2010 18:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/02/23/toyota-official-testifies-that-recall-may-not-totally-fix-proble/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19370504/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/02/23/toyota-official-testifies-that-recall-may-not-totally-fix-proble/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>autos</category><category>cars</category><category>ehicles</category><category>recall</category><category>safety recall</category><category>SafetyRecall</category><category>toyoda</category><category>toyota</category><category>toyota recall</category><category>ToyotaRecall</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Michael Fowlkes]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 23 Feb 2010 18:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Toyota Issues Apologies to Customers and Lawmakers]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/02/10/toyota-issues-apologies-to-customers-and-lawmakers/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/02/10/toyota-issues-apologies-to-customers-and-lawmakers/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/02/10/toyota-issues-apologies-to-customers-and-lawmakers/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/competitive-strategy/" rel="tag">Competitive Strategy</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/marketing-and-advertising/" rel="tag">Marketing and Advertising</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/tm/" rel="tag">Toyota Motor Corp. (TM)</a></p><p><img hspace="4" vspace="4" border="1" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.dailyfinance.com/media/2010/02/toyotarecallcamryap240.jpg" />Toyota (<a target="_blank" href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/toyota-motor-corporation/tm/nys">TM</a>) has been all over the news thanks to brake problems and subsequent recalls, and now the company is launching a bit of <a target="_blank" href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/article/toyota-seeks-damage-control-in-public/876066/">damage control</a>.</p>
<p>Tuesday, Toyota had to recall 440,000 Prius and other hybrids thanks to brake problems, pushing the company's total global recall to 8.5 million cars and trucks. During the new conference, the company stated that it will "regain the confidence of our customers," trying to start a bit of damage control.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/02/10/toyota-issues-apologies-to-customers-and-lawmakers/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Toyota Issues Apologies to Customers and Lawmakers</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/02/10/toyota-issues-apologies-to-customers-and-lawmakers/">Toyota Issues Apologies to Customers and Lawmakers</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 10 Feb 2010 11:40:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/02/10/toyota-issues-apologies-to-customers-and-lawmakers/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19352067/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/02/10/toyota-issues-apologies-to-customers-and-lawmakers/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Capitol Hill</category><category>featured</category><category>inthenews</category><category>lawmakers</category><category>recall</category><category>technical analysis</category><category>TM</category><category>toyota prius</category><category>toyota recall</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark Fightmaster]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 10 Feb 2010 11:40:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Toyota Recalls Are Much Ado About Not Much]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/02/05/toyota-recalls-much-ado-about-not-much/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/02/05/toyota-recalls-much-ado-about-not-much/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/02/05/toyota-recalls-much-ado-about-not-much/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/f/" rel="tag">Ford Motor (F)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/tm/" rel="tag">Toyota Motor Corp. (TM)</a></p><p><img hspace="4" vspace="4" border="1" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/05/toyotapic.jpg" />There has been a recent avalanche of press coverage regarding the <a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/business/8499770.stm">alleged engineering problems</a> being experienced by Toyota Motor Company (<a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/toyota-motor-corporation/tm/nys">TM</a>). Pretty much all of that press coverage depicts a company that is writhing in shame on the one hand and that is desperately looking to retake a foothold within itself on the other. My initial reaction to the knee-jerk downward pressure on TM that seems to be the result of this situation is: Really, you have got to be kidding.</p>
<p>First of all, how many of the people who might be reading this blog found themselves taken aback by the announcement that some automobiles were being recalled? Yes, I understand that the potential vehicle problems are serious. Yes, I understand that the situation affects literally millions of vehicles. However, at its root, this is just another recall of just another manufacturer's product. It's hardly an earth-shattering event.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/02/05/toyota-recalls-much-ado-about-not-much/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Toyota Recalls Are Much Ado About Not Much</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/02/05/toyota-recalls-much-ado-about-not-much/">Toyota Recalls Are Much Ado About Not Much</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 05 Feb 2010 18:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/02/05/toyota-recalls-much-ado-about-not-much/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19346917/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/02/05/toyota-recalls-much-ado-about-not-much/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>brakes</category><category>recall</category><category>sell off</category><category>TM</category><category>Toyota</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Gary Sattler]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 05 Feb 2010 18:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Johnson &amp; Johnson Recalling Tainted Tylenol Bottles]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/29/johnson-and-johnson-recalling-tainted-tylenol-bottles/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/29/johnson-and-johnson-recalling-tainted-tylenol-bottles/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/29/johnson-and-johnson-recalling-tainted-tylenol-bottles/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/bad-news/" rel="tag">Bad News</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/jnj/" rel="tag">Johnson and Johnson (JNJ)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/analysis/" rel="tag">Technical Analysis</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/djia/" rel="tag">DJIA</a></p><p><img border="1" hspace="4" alt="" vspace="4" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2009/12/jnj-logo-240.jpg" />Dow member Johnson &amp; Johnson (<a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/johnson-and-johnson/jnj/nys">JNJ</a>) is <a href="http://money.aol.com/rtn/ap/tylenol-arthritis-caplet-voluntary-recall-expanded/rfid284341408?channel=pf">expanding its voluntary recall</a> of Tylenol Arthritis Pain Caplets, due to consumer reports of an unusual moldy odor emanating from the pill bottles. J&amp;J previously recalled five lots of the over-the-counter painkiller, but the recall has now been expanded to all product lots of the Arthritis Pain Caplet 100-count bottles with the red EZ-Open cap.</p>
<p>The musty odor, according to Johnson &amp; Johnson, can be traced back to a chemical known as 2,4,6-tribromoanisole, which results from the breakdown of a different chemical in wooden pallets used in transporting and storage. J&amp;J will resume production of the 100-count Arthritis Pain Caplets in January, after relocating production to a new facility.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/29/johnson-and-johnson-recalling-tainted-tylenol-bottles/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Johnson &amp; Johnson Recalling Tainted Tylenol Bottles</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/29/johnson-and-johnson-recalling-tainted-tylenol-bottles/">Johnson &amp; Johnson Recalling Tainted Tylenol Bottles</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 29 Dec 2009 12:30:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/29/johnson-and-johnson-recalling-tainted-tylenol-bottles/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19296815/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/29/johnson-and-johnson-recalling-tainted-tylenol-bottles/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>FDA</category><category>inthenews</category><category>JNJ</category><category>Johnson and Johnson</category><category>options</category><category>recall</category><category>short interest</category><category>short sellers</category><category>technical analysis</category><category>Tylenol</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Elizabeth Harrow]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 29 Dec 2009 12:30:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Painfully vulnerable: UnderArmour recalls athletic cups]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/04/30/painfully-vulnerable-underarmour-recalls-athletic-cups/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/04/30/painfully-vulnerable-underarmour-recalls-athletic-cups/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/04/30/painfully-vulnerable-underarmour-recalls-athletic-cups/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/ua/" rel="tag">Under Armour'A' (UA)</a></p><p><img alt="" hspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/11/ua-under-armour-logo.jpg" align="right" vspace="4" border="1" />Athletic apparel maker <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/under-armour-inc/ua/nys">Under Armour</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/under-armour-inc/ua/nys">UA</a>) has been heroic of late, with strong earnings on its increasingly ubiquitous polyester tough-guy sports apparel, and sneakers that defied the crushing consumer spending slowdown. </p>
<p>But even tough products can crack. Apparently that was the fault the U.S. Consumer Products Safety Commission found with Under Armour's athletic cups when it <a href="http://www.cpsc.gov/cpscpub/prerel/prhtml09/09202.html">issued a recall for over 200,000 protective cups </a>bearing Under Armour's logo. Manufactured in China, the cups could shatter if hit, potentially resulting in serious injuries to cup-wearer.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/04/30/painfully-vulnerable-underarmour-recalls-athletic-cups/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Painfully vulnerable: UnderArmour recalls athletic cups</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/04/30/painfully-vulnerable-underarmour-recalls-athletic-cups/">Painfully vulnerable: UnderArmour recalls athletic cups</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 30 Apr 2009 10:40:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/04/30/painfully-vulnerable-underarmour-recalls-athletic-cups/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1532361/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/04/30/painfully-vulnerable-underarmour-recalls-athletic-cups/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>CSPC</category><category>featured</category><category>recall</category><category>UA</category><category>Under Armour</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Alex Salkever]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 30 Apr 2009 10:40:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Pistachio recall could be widespread, includes Kraft]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/31/pistachio-recall-could-be-widespread-includes-kraft/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/31/pistachio-recall-could-be-widespread-includes-kraft/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/31/pistachio-recall-could-be-widespread-includes-kraft/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/bad-news/" rel="tag">Bad News</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/products-and-services/" rel="tag">Products and Services</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/rants-and-raves/" rel="tag">Rants and Raves</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/kr/" rel="tag">Kroger Co (KR)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/kft/" rel="tag">Kraft Foods'A' (KFT)</a></p><a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/theogeo/532034075/"><img hspace="4" border="0" align="right" vspace="4" alt=""  src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2009/03/pistachios_theogeo.jpg" /></a>When we first noted a small-ish recall which were recalled yesterday and, at first blush, the alert looks as if it could be as widespread and enormous as the peanut butter recall (mollified a little by the fact peanuts are far more ubiquitous than pistachios).  <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/30/kroger-recalling-pistachios-how-will-the-stock-react/">recall of canned pistachios early yesterday</a>, it was limited to <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/the-kroger-co/kr/nys">Kroger</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/the-kroger-co/kr/nys">KR</a>) and, frankly, made little in the way of waves. Later, the news began to hearken to the <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/14/after-three-deaths-peanut-butter-corp-of-america-recalling-poss/">beginning of the peanut recall</a>, in which I wondered how many foods could be impacted (oh, I had no idea!). <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2009/03/31/business/31nuts.html?hp">The pistachio nuts' originator, Setton Pistachio</a> of Terra Bella, Calif., decided to recall its 2008 crop after <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/kraft-foods-inc/kft/nys">Kraft</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/kraft-foods-inc/kft/nys">KFT</a>) tested some of its pistachio-containing products and found "several types of salmonella." Where the possibly tainted pistachios ended up isn't clear, but Kraft pulled a trail mix with pistachios.<br /><br />The nuts were sent in 1,000-pound and 2000-pound bags to wholesalers, who then parceled the pistachios further to redistribute them among retailers and manufacturers. As I <a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/2009/03/31/peanuts-pistachios-pepper-processing-the-ps-of-salmonella/">wrote on DailyFinance</a>, this is yet another example of a food industry that is built on logistics, not food; quality ingredients are marketing, not reality. Neither Kroger nor Kraft nor even (to point a finger at random) Unilever's <a href="http://www.haagendazs.com/company/cartons.aspx">Haagen-Dazs ice cream</a> can trace to the individual farm the origin of all of their ingredients, no matter how many times the packaging mentions it.<br /><br />It's further proof that food safety is not truly possible in the industry as it currently stands.<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/31/pistachio-recall-could-be-widespread-includes-kraft/">Pistachio recall could be widespread, includes Kraft</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 31 Mar 2009 18:10:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/31/pistachio-recall-could-be-widespread-includes-kraft/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1504045/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/31/pistachio-recall-could-be-widespread-includes-kraft/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>kft</category><category>kr</category><category>peanuts</category><category>pistachios</category><category>recall</category><category>recalls</category><category>salmonella</category><category>setton pistachio</category><category>SettonPistachio</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Sarah Gilbert]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 31 Mar 2009 18:10:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Peanut Corp. knew salmonella was in its peanut butter]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/27/peanut-corp-knew-salmonella-was-in-its-peanut-butter/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/27/peanut-corp-knew-salmonella-was-in-its-peanut-butter/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/27/peanut-corp-knew-salmonella-was-in-its-peanut-butter/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/bad-news/" rel="tag">Bad News</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/management/" rel="tag">Management</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/consumer-experience/" rel="tag">Consumer Experience</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/scandals/" rel="tag">Scandals</a></p><img hspace="4" border="0" align="right" vspace="4" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2009/01/peanut_butter_apples.jpg" />Managers at Peanut Corporation of America must be thanking the country whose name the company invokes so boldly in its name: that it is not China. For were Peanut Corporation of America Chinese, managers would surely be facing the death penalty. Today officials at the FDA revealed that the Georgia plant responsible for the salmonella outbreak currently linked to eight deaths and 500 sicknesses across the country -- and leading to recalls of more than 100 products -- <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/01/27/AR2009012702992.html">knowingly shipped peanut butter contaminated with salmonella</a>.<br /><br />In a dozen tests over a two-year period, internal testing revealed salmonella in peanut butter at the plant, but it was shipped, anyway. The plant was riddled with four separate strains of salmonella in tests conducted by the CDC. Panicky consumers (me, for instance) have already started to forgo purchasing other peanut butter products from manufacturers not linked to the recall.<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/27/peanut-corp-knew-salmonella-was-in-its-peanut-butter/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Peanut Corp. knew salmonella was in its peanut butter</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/27/peanut-corp-knew-salmonella-was-in-its-peanut-butter/">Peanut Corp. knew salmonella was in its peanut butter</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 27 Jan 2009 21:40:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/01/27/AR2009012702992.html>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/27/peanut-corp-knew-salmonella-was-in-its-peanut-butter/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1442835/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/27/peanut-corp-knew-salmonella-was-in-its-peanut-butter/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>peanut</category><category>peanut butter</category><category>peanut corporation of america</category><category>PeanutButter</category><category>PeanutCorporationOfAmerica</category><category>recall</category><category>they knew</category><category>TheyKnew</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Sarah Gilbert]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 27 Jan 2009 21:40:00 EST</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
