<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd">
<channel>
<title>BloggingStocks</title>
<link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com</link>
<description>BloggingStocks</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Can GE beat its whisper number?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/07/08/can-ge-beat-its-whisper-number/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/07/08/can-ge-beat-its-whisper-number/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/07/08/can-ge-beat-its-whisper-number/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/ge/" rel="tag">General Electric (GE)</a></p><p><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/ge/nys">General Electric Company</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/ge/nys">GE</a>) is scheduled to report second quarter earnings this Friday. Ten analysts that <em><a href="http://moneycentral.msn.com/investor/invsub/analyst/earnest.asp?Symbol=Ge">Zacks</a></em> surveys expect GE to make 53 cents a share, the same as it did in 2007. Given that 0% growth rate, GE's forward Price/Earnings ratio of 12.1 seems a bit on the high side. </p>
<p>But after the <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/04/23/ges-immelt-reduced-to-whining-after-homicidal-rant-from-jack-we/">spanking</a> that CEO Jeff Immelt took after missing in the first quarter by <a href="http://moneycentral.msn.com/investor/invsub/analyst/earnest.asp?Page=EarningsSurprise&amp;Symbol=GE">13.7%</a>, he could be guiding analysts lower only to surprise them on the upside. This makes me wonder whether analysts have a higher, whisper number in mind. GE stock is down 32% since Immelt took over on <a href="http://www.portfolio.com/resources/executive-profiles/Jeffrey-R-Immelt-17359">September 7, 2001</a>, but with the exception of the first quarter, over the last five years GE has increased earnings at an <a href="http://moneycentral.msn.com/investor/invsub/analyst/earnest.asp?Page=EarningsSurprise&amp;Symbol=GE">8.1%</a> annual rate.</p>
<p>If it got back on that track in the second quarter, then investors would expect GE to earn 57 cents a share, instead of the official 53 cents. In that case, GE stock would fall unless it exceeded 57 cents a share. I have not been able to determine whether there is such a whisper number floating around Wall Street, but there's no question in my mind that Immelt cannot afford to report a number less than 53 cents a share if he wants to keep his job.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/07/08/can-ge-beat-its-whisper-number/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Can GE beat its whisper number?</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/07/08/can-ge-beat-its-whisper-number/">Can GE beat its whisper number?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 08 Jul 2008 12:37:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/07/08/can-ge-beat-its-whisper-number/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1248645/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/07/08/can-ge-beat-its-whisper-number/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>ge</category><category>general electric</category><category>GeneralElectric</category><category>immelt</category><category>jack welch</category><category>JackWelch</category><category>reg jones</category><category>RegJones</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Peter Cohan]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 08 Jul 2008 12:37:00 EST</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
