What are likely to be Congress's performance conditions for any rescue package for Big Three auto manufacturers General Motors, Ford, and Chrysler?
First, it should be noted that many Americans oppose
any auto maker rescue/bailout, and the stance contains a legitimate point: that underperforming private companies shouldn't be rewarded for operational errors.
Still, a stronger argument holds that a cessation of U.S. auto company operations would severely hurt an already weak U.S. economy - - with an unacceptable increase in unemployment, particularly in the Midwest U.S., and other negative economic ramifications. Hence, Congress is very likely to pass and either President Bush/President-elect Obama will sign a performance-based rescue package.
The plan's performance metrics are likely to include:
- a credible, coherent plan for auto manufacturer viability and profitability;
- wage, benefit, and payment sacrifices by all stake holders: management, unionized employees, suppliers, dealers, contractors, shareholders, and creditors, etc.;
- the elimination of executive and management bonuses, if certain metrics are not me;
- a next-generation vehicle platform that reduces U.S. dependence on oil and that radically increases fuel efficiency/miles per gallon;
- debt-to-equity options, perhaps in the form of convertible bonds, that give the U.S. government the option of purchasing shares, should federal oversight officials choose to do so, to enable the government to share in any automaker's success;
- senior debt status for any U.S. government loans;
- full General Accounting Office access to auto maker financial records and business plans for the duration of the rescue package.