<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd">
<channel>
<title>BloggingStocks</title>
<link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com</link>
<description>BloggingStocks</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[CIT Group plummets on going concern doubts, Chapter 11 threat]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/08/11/cit-group-plummets-on-going-concern-doubts-chapter-11-threat/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/08/11/cit-group-plummets-on-going-concern-doubts-chapter-11-threat/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/08/11/cit-group-plummets-on-going-concern-doubts-chapter-11-threat/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/earnings-reports/" rel="tag">Earnings Reports</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/sec-filings/" rel="tag">SEC Filings</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/bad-news/" rel="tag">Bad News</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/cit/" rel="tag">CIT Group (CIT)</a></p><p><img hspace="4" align="right" vspace="4" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.dailyfinance.com/media/2009/07/cit.jpg" />As if there weren't sufficient causes already to refer to <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/cit-group-inc-del/cit/nys">CIT Group</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/cit-group-inc-del/cit/nys">CIT</a>) as "beleaguered," the list just got longer. This morning, the financial services firm <a href="http://www.marketwatch.com/enf/rss.asp?guid=%7B570D2686-9F1D-455B-A467-148ADC58D97B%7D&amp;siteid=aolRss">delayed filing its second-quarter report</a> with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), citing the ongoing restructuring of its debt as a mitigating factor.</p>
<p>Specifically, CIT told the regulatory agency that it could not meet Monday's 10-Q deadline "without unreasonable effort and expense," since executives have been spending most of their time lately attending to restructuring needs. The company is expecting a second-quarter loss in excess of $1.5 billion, thanks in large part to a loss totaling $2.1 billion from its discontinued home-lending operations.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/08/11/cit-group-plummets-on-going-concern-doubts-chapter-11-threat/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>CIT Group plummets on going concern doubts, Chapter 11 threat</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/08/11/cit-group-plummets-on-going-concern-doubts-chapter-11-threat/">CIT Group plummets on going concern doubts, Chapter 11 threat</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 11 Aug 2009 09:50:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/08/11/cit-group-plummets-on-going-concern-doubts-chapter-11-threat/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19125536/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/08/11/cit-group-plummets-on-going-concern-doubts-chapter-11-threat/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>10-Q</category><category>bankruptcy</category><category>Chapter 11</category><category>Chapter11</category><category>CIT Group</category><category>CitGroup</category><category>going concern</category><category>GoingConcern</category><category>inthenews</category><category>restructuring</category><category>SEC</category><category>technical analysis</category><category>TechnicalAnalysis</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Elizabeth Harrow]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 11 Aug 2009 09:50:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Monsanto tops 3Q profit estimates, warns on Roundup earnings]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/06/24/monsanto-tops-3q-profit-estimates-warns-on-roundup-earnings/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/06/24/monsanto-tops-3q-profit-estimates-warns-on-roundup-earnings/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/06/24/monsanto-tops-3q-profit-estimates-warns-on-roundup-earnings/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/earnings-reports/" rel="tag">Earnings Reports</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/forecasts/" rel="tag">Forecasts</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/options/" rel="tag">Options</a></p><p><img alt="" hspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/12/monsanto.jpg" align="right" vspace="4" border="1" /><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/monsanto-company/mon/nys">Monsanto Co.</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/monsanto-company/mon/nys">MON</a>) pleasantly surprised the Street with a stronger-than-expected <a href="http://www.reuters.com/legacyArticle?duid=mtfh91836_2009-06-24_14-23-47_n24155884_newsml&amp;rpc=33&amp;type=marketsnews">third-quarter profit</a>. This morning, the company reported quarterly net income of $694 million, or $1.25 per share, besting analysts' expectations for a profit of $1.18 per share. Net sales arrived at $3.2 billion, down 11% from the year-ago period.</p>
<p>Additionally, Monsanto said it will create a separate division for its herbicides business, in order to "better align spending and working capital needs." The firm will also undergo a restructuring that will result in 900 lost jobs, or less than 4% of its global workforce. The change will translate to a fourth-quarter charge of roughly $350 million, or 41 cents to 47 cents per share.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/06/24/monsanto-tops-3q-profit-estimates-warns-on-roundup-earnings/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Monsanto tops 3Q profit estimates, warns on Roundup earnings</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/06/24/monsanto-tops-3q-profit-estimates-warns-on-roundup-earnings/">Monsanto tops 3Q profit estimates, warns on Roundup earnings</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 24 Jun 2009 12:40:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/06/24/monsanto-tops-3q-profit-estimates-warns-on-roundup-earnings/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19076638/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/06/24/monsanto-tops-3q-profit-estimates-warns-on-roundup-earnings/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>herbicides</category><category>inthenews</category><category>job cuts</category><category>MON</category><category>Monsanto Company</category><category>options</category><category>restructuring</category><category>Roundup</category><category>technical analysis</category><category>third-quarter earnings</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Elizabeth Harrow]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 24 Jun 2009 12:40:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[GM and United Auto Workers to clinch deal on health care]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/05/22/gm-and-united-auto-workers-to-clinch-deal-on-health-care/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/05/22/gm-and-united-auto-workers-to-clinch-deal-on-health-care/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/05/22/gm-and-united-auto-workers-to-clinch-deal-on-health-care/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/management/" rel="tag">Management</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/gm/" rel="tag">General Motors (GM)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/employees/" rel="tag">Employees</a></p><p><img hspace="4" border="1" align="right" vspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/10/makeover-24-200cm101608.jpg" alt="" />In a clock-stopping move,<a href="http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/05e0c0a8-4635-11de-803f-00144feabdc0.html"> the United Auto Workers and GM have come to an agreement</a> on a health care deal. The key provision of the deal is that GM would contribute shares instead of cash to a health-care trust known as a Voluntary Employees Beneficiary Association (Veba). </p>
<p>In so doing, the UAW would own 39% of GM. The mix of ownership would then be 50% to the government, 39% to the UAW and 10% to the bondholders, with the remaining 1% for current shareholders. The agreement still must be ratified by GM workers.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/05/22/gm-and-united-auto-workers-to-clinch-deal-on-health-care/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>GM and United Auto Workers to clinch deal on health care</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/05/22/gm-and-united-auto-workers-to-clinch-deal-on-health-care/">GM and United Auto Workers to clinch deal on health care</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 22 May 2009 13:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/05e0c0a8-4635-11de-803f-00144feabdc0.html>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/05/22/gm-and-united-auto-workers-to-clinch-deal-on-health-care/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1553898/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/05/22/gm-and-united-auto-workers-to-clinch-deal-on-health-care/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>bankruptcy</category><category>GM</category><category>inthenews</category><category>restructuring</category><category>uaw</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Connie Madon]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 22 May 2009 13:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[American International Group's restructuring could take years]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/05/11/american-international-groups-restructuring-could-take-years/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/05/11/american-international-groups-restructuring-could-take-years/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/05/11/american-international-groups-restructuring-could-take-years/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/aig/" rel="tag">Amer Intl Group (AIG)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/options/" rel="tag">Options</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/financial-crisis/" rel="tag">Financial Crisis</a></p><p><img hspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/12/aig-american-international-group-logo.jpg" align="right" vspace="4" border="1" alt="" />A report today in <em><a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB124200391881705297.html">The Wall Street Journal</a></em> [subscription required] indicates that the restructuring of <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/american-international-group-inc/aig/nys">American International Group, Inc.</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/american-international-group-inc/aig/nys">AIG</a>) could be a multi-year process. </p>
<p>The paper cites an internal email sent to AIG employees on April 23, which describes an initiative known as "Project Destiny." The dreamily named plan involves a 45-day review of the insurance issue's various units, which is then meant to generate a longer-term road map for the future.</p>
<p>While the internal memo explains Project Destiny as an "effort to redefine the future of most of the major businesses within <span class="HIGHLIGHTCOLOR1" id="txtStory" tabindex="65535">AIG,</span><span class="HIGHLIGHTCOLOR0" id="txtStory" tabindex="65535">" Chief Restructuring Officer Paula Reynolds described the initiative in terms indicating that all AIG needs to regain its <em>joie de vivre</em> is a torrid island affair with a younger man. "Simply put, we are going to get our groove back," she enthused.</span></p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/05/11/american-international-groups-restructuring-could-take-years/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>American International Group's restructuring could take years</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/05/11/american-international-groups-restructuring-could-take-years/">American International Group's restructuring could take years</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 11 May 2009 10:30:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/05/11/american-international-groups-restructuring-could-take-years/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1542313/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/05/11/american-international-groups-restructuring-could-take-years/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>AIG</category><category>American International Group</category><category>AmericanInternationalGroup</category><category>inthenews</category><category>options</category><category>Paula Reynolds</category><category>PaulaReynolds</category><category>Project Destiny</category><category>ProjectDestiny</category><category>restructuring</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Elizabeth Harrow]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 11 May 2009 10:30:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[New GM will include Cadillac and Chevy and chuck the rest]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/04/01/new-gm-will-include-cadillac-and-chevy-and-chuck-the-rest/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/04/01/new-gm-will-include-cadillac-and-chevy-and-chuck-the-rest/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/04/01/new-gm-will-include-cadillac-and-chevy-and-chuck-the-rest/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/gm/" rel="tag">General Motors (GM)</a></p><p><img hspace="4" align="right" vspace="4" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/08/general-motors-gm-logo.jpg" />Alfred P. Sloan, the legendary CEO of <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/general-motors-corporation/gm/nys">General Motors Corp.</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/general-motors-corporation/gm/nys">GM</a>) from 1934 to 1956, envisioned GM as a company that would offer a car for every income level, thus keeping customers in the GM fold as they climbed the ladder of American success from their entry level jobs to their peak earnings years. Starting out, a customer would buy a Chevrolet and then keep buying bigger intermediate cars -- e.g., Pontiacs, Oldsmobiles and Buicks -- before reaching the summit -- Cadillac.</p>
<p>The new GM won't sell you those intermediate cars -- it will get you at the bottom (Chevrolet) and the top (Cadillac) and offer you nothing in between. Through something called a <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2009/04/01/business/01bankruptcy.html?hp">Section 363</a> bankruptcy, GM will sell its most valuable assets -- Chevy and Cadillac -- to a new government-funded company. The rest of GM -- Buick, Pontiac, Hummer, etc. -- will be left in the old GM. The proceeds from selling the good assets will help pay claims like GM's <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2009/04/01/business/01motors.html?hpw">$27 billion</a> in unsecured debt and its $20 billion in union pension liabilities.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/04/01/new-gm-will-include-cadillac-and-chevy-and-chuck-the-rest/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>New GM will include Cadillac and Chevy and chuck the rest</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/04/01/new-gm-will-include-cadillac-and-chevy-and-chuck-the-rest/">New GM will include Cadillac and Chevy and chuck the rest</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 01 Apr 2009 10:10:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/04/01/new-gm-will-include-cadillac-and-chevy-and-chuck-the-rest/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1504656/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/04/01/new-gm-will-include-cadillac-and-chevy-and-chuck-the-rest/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>bankruptcy</category><category>featured</category><category>general motors</category><category>GeneralMotors</category><category>gm</category><category>restructuring</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Peter Cohan]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 01 Apr 2009 10:10:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[The absurd notion of an 'auto czar']]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/12/07/the-absurd-notion-of-an-auto-czar/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/12/07/the-absurd-notion-of-an-auto-czar/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/12/07/the-absurd-notion-of-an-auto-czar/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/gm/" rel="tag">General Motors (GM)</a></p><p>One of the latest ideas being kicked around by Congress and the White House is naming an "auto czar" to oversee how the taxpayer's money is spent on the bailout of The Big Three.</p>
<p><a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB122861961053885743.html?mod=testMod">According to <em>The Wall Street Journal</em></a> (subscription required), "Negotiations over a government rescue of the Big Three automakers slowed Saturday as Congress and the White House debated over the role of an 'auto czar' who would oversee a restructuring of the industry."</p>
<p>Which restructuring is that? The one where <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/general-motors-corporation/gm/nys">GM</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/general-motors-corporation/gm/nys">GM</a>) and Chrysler go through a prepackaged bankruptcy to cut union costs and debt? Or, the one where the Detroit firms get $34 million to retool their factories and negotiate with labor and creditors? Or, the one where GM and Chrysler merge?</p>
<p>The issues that are the most pressing for the American automotive industry are not how to supervise a restructuring. They are what form a restructuring will take, how much money will be needed, and what will happen if, in six months, the first bailout is financially inadequate.</p>
<p>At this point the auto czar really has nothing to be in charge of.</p>
<p><em>Douglas A. McIntyre is an editor at 247wallst.com.</em></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/12/07/the-absurd-notion-of-an-auto-czar/">The absurd notion of an 'auto czar'</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Sun, 07 Dec 2008 07:14:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/12/07/the-absurd-notion-of-an-auto-czar/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1393567/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/12/07/the-absurd-notion-of-an-auto-czar/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>auto czar</category><category>bailouts</category><category>Chrysler</category><category>Congress</category><category>General Motors</category><category>GM</category><category>restructuring</category><category>The Big Three</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Douglas McIntyre]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 07 Dec 2008 07:14:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Six steps to restructure GM]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/18/six-steps-to-restructure-gm/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/18/six-steps-to-restructure-gm/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/18/six-steps-to-restructure-gm/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/gm/" rel="tag">General Motors (GM)</a></p><p><img hspace="4" align="right" vspace="4" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/08/general-motors-gm-logo.jpg" /><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/general-motors-corporation/gm/nys">General Motors Corp.</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/general-motors-corporation/gm/nys">GM</a>) should get government help with financing in Chapter 11 once it restructures in a <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2008/11/18/business/economy/18sorkin.html?ref=business&amp;pagewanted=all">pre-packaged bankruptcy</a>. A restructuring would jettison GM's management team, cut labor costs, close unprofitable dealerships, and toss overboard GM's money-losing product lines. Taxpayers should not pay the salaries of people who can't operate a profitable business.</p>
<p>Here are six steps of a proposed restructuring that could save $16 billion a year:</p>
<ul>
    <li><strong>Allow GM to merge with Chrysler</strong> -- but only if Cerberus, which owns Chrysler, sees its equity wiped out -- to save $7 billion in annual costs; </li>
    <li><strong>Dump unprofitable brands -- </strong>Cadillac, Chevy and Buick (it is popular in China) would be the surviving GM brands. All the others -- Saturn, Pontiac, GMC and Saab -- would be sold to interested buyers or shut down. This would save $5 billion a year; </li>
    <li><strong>Close related dealerships</strong> -- this would cut $4 billion annually; </li>
</ul><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/18/six-steps-to-restructure-gm/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Six steps to restructure GM</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/18/six-steps-to-restructure-gm/">Six steps to restructure GM</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 18 Nov 2008 10:25:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/18/six-steps-to-restructure-gm/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1375337/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/18/six-steps-to-restructure-gm/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>bailout</category><category>featured</category><category>general motors</category><category>GeneralMotors</category><category>gm</category><category>restructuring</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Peter Cohan]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 18 Nov 2008 10:25:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Novartis (NVS) fourth-quarter profit plunges]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/01/17/novartis-nvs-fourth-quarter-profit-plunges/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/01/17/novartis-nvs-fourth-quarter-profit-plunges/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/01/17/novartis-nvs-fourth-quarter-profit-plunges/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/earnings-reports/" rel="tag">Earnings Reports</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/forecasts/" rel="tag">Forecasts</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/bad-news/" rel="tag">Bad News</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/nvs/" rel="tag">Novartis AG ADS (NVS)</a></p><p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/11/nvs-novartis-logo.jpg" alt="" />Shares of Swiss pharmaceutical maker <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/novartis-ag-ads/nvs/nys">Novartis AG</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/novartis-ag-ads/nvs/nys">NVS</a>) are lower in early morning trading after the company announced its <a href="http://money.aol.com/news/articles/_a/novartis-4q-net-profit-falls-45-percent/n20080117073209990016">fourth-quarter net profit fell by 45%</a>, hurt by a restructuring charge and higher generic competition.</p>
<p>Novartis said net profit attributable to shareholders slipped to $904 million from $1.65 billion in the fourth quarter. Net profit from continuing operations also plunged 42% to $931 million from $1.6 billion in the same period of last year. The results were below analysts' average estimate of a profit of $1.33 billion. Included in the company's figures was a $444 million charge related to Novartis's cost-savings program pressured earnings. </p>
<p>However, Novartis results weren't really a surprise, as analysts had anticipated the fourth quarter would be weak for the drugmaker after the company announced in December that it would cut 2,500 jobs worldwide. Its decision came on worries over ongoing challenges from generics producers. Novartis declared that the job cuts brought the $444 million fourth-quarter charge, but it expects to save $1.6 billion in costs each year until 2010.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/01/17/novartis-nvs-fourth-quarter-profit-plunges/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Novartis (NVS) fourth-quarter profit plunges</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/01/17/novartis-nvs-fourth-quarter-profit-plunges/">Novartis (NVS) fourth-quarter profit plunges</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 17 Jan 2008 11:40:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/01/17/novartis-nvs-fourth-quarter-profit-plunges/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1089351/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/01/17/novartis-nvs-fourth-quarter-profit-plunges/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>earnings</category><category>inthenews</category><category>Novartis</category><category>NVS</category><category>pharmaceutical</category><category>restructuring</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Eliza Popescu]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 17 Jan 2008 11:40:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Avon (AVP) plans to slash 2,400 jobs]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/01/08/avon-avp-plans-slash-2-400-jobs/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/01/08/avon-avp-plans-slash-2-400-jobs/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/01/08/avon-avp-plans-slash-2-400-jobs/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/management/" rel="tag">Management</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/competitive-strategy/" rel="tag">Competitive Strategy</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/employees/" rel="tag">Employees</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/avp/" rel="tag">Avon Products (AVP)</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/09/avon-avp-logo.gif" alt="" />As part of its ongoing restructuring program, beauty products giant <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/avon-products-incorporated/avp/nys">Avon Products</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/avon-products-incorporated/avp/nys">AVP</a>) announced plans to <a href="http://money.aol.com/news/articles/_a/avon-to-cut-2400-jobs-in-restructuring/n20080108110709990049">reduce its workforce by 2,400 jobs</a>. The company's restructuring plan was first announced in 2005, and the company is now looking at completing the restructuring in 2011.<br /><br />Previously, the restructuring was supposed to run the company $500 million, but now the estimates are pointing to a total cost closer to $530 million. Once completed, the company plans to save itself approximately $430 million annually. This is substantially higher than the original $300 million annual savings the company had initially anticipated.<br /><br />While the company has been moving through its restructuring over the past two years, the stock has been trading pretty strong. Since the end of 2005, the stock has moved from $27.34 to its current price of $39.00, picking up 42.6% for its shareholders.<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/01/08/avon-avp-plans-slash-2-400-jobs/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Avon (AVP) plans to slash 2,400 jobs</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/01/08/avon-avp-plans-slash-2-400-jobs/">Avon (AVP) plans to slash 2,400 jobs</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 08 Jan 2008 12:38:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://money.aol.com/news/articles/_a/avon-to-cut-2400-jobs-in-restructuring/n20080108110709990049>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/01/08/avon-avp-plans-slash-2-400-jobs/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1081075/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/01/08/avon-avp-plans-slash-2-400-jobs/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Avon</category><category>AVP</category><category>C</category><category>Citigroup</category><category>employees</category><category>inthenews</category><category>restructuring</category><category>Wendy Nicholson</category><category>WendyNicholson</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Michael Fowlkes]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 08 Jan 2008 12:38:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Dell (DELL) announces more job cuts]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/10/11/dell-dell-announces-250-job-cuts-in-tennessee/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/10/11/dell-dell-announces-250-job-cuts-in-tennessee/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/10/11/dell-dell-announces-250-job-cuts-in-tennessee/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/bad-news/" rel="tag">Bad News</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/dell/" rel="tag">Dell (DELL)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/employees/" rel="tag">Employees</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/technology/" rel="tag">Technology</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/09/dell-computers-dell-logo.jpg" /><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/dell-inc/dell/nas">Dell Inc.</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/dell-inc/dell/nas">DELL</a>) will be laying off about 250 technical support employees at its Nashville, Tennessee customer service location as part of a broad cost restructuring movement that was announced this past May. The job cuts will be effective immediately according to the company, with affected employees being offered sales positions, with others receiving severance packages and outplacement assistance. That's good -- it's hard to think of a technical support specialist being a good salesperson. Those two mindsets rarely co-exist in the same brain.<br /><br />Dell has been busy all summer restructuring support operations to give the company a leaner cost structure. At the same time, it's revamping much of its consumer product line to better compete with rival <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/hewlett-packard-company/hpq/nys">Hewlett-Packard Corp.</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/hewlett-packard-company/hpq/nys">HPQ</a>) and entering the retail market (in what I consider to be a too hurried fashion). However, that's not stopping Dell from having its boring PC boxes loaded up on pallets at your local <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/wal-mart-stores-in-com-usd0-10/wmt/nys">Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/wal-mart-stores-in-com-usd0-10/wmt/nys">WMT</a>) location.<br /><br />Dell's 81,000 global employees will <a href="http://canadianpress.google.com/article/ALeqM5gFjbu0XKjrvlE3O">see their ranks cut by about 10%</a> based on what the company announced in May, so there are more cuts coming. Right now, Dell officials are not saying how far along the company is in the move to lay off over 8,000 employees globally or what the numbers are for each business unit within the computer manufacturer. The Tennessee support location has grown from about 200 employees to more than 4,000 since opening in 1999, but business needs have changed quite a bit since then.<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/10/11/dell-dell-announces-250-job-cuts-in-tennessee/">Dell (DELL) announces more job cuts</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 11 Oct 2007 14:08:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://canadianpress.google.com/article/ALeqM5gFjbu0XKjrvlE3OPvHp1ZMQfDQJw>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/10/11/dell-dell-announces-250-job-cuts-in-tennessee/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1010706/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/10/11/dell-dell-announces-250-job-cuts-in-tennessee/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Dell</category><category>Dell, Inc.</category><category>Dell,Inc.</category><category>inthenews</category><category>layoffs</category><category>restructuring</category><category>Technical Support</category><category>TechnicalSupport</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Brian White]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 11 Oct 2007 14:08:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Option update: NASDAQ blue chips -- YHOO, MSFT, AMGN, CSCO]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/08/16/option-update-nasdaq-blue-chips-yhoo-msft-amgn-csco/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/08/16/option-update-nasdaq-blue-chips-yhoo-msft-amgn-csco/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/08/16/option-update-nasdaq-blue-chips-yhoo-msft-amgn-csco/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/msft/" rel="tag">Microsoft (MSFT)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/yhoo/" rel="tag">Yahoo! (YHOO)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/csco/" rel="tag">Cisco Systems (CSCO)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/amgn/" rel="tag">Amgen Inc (AMGN)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/options/" rel="tag">Options</a></p><p><img align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/08/flywall_final_logo_mini.gif" alt="" /><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/yahoo-inc/yhoo/nas"><strong>Yahoo</strong></a>! (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/yahoo-inc/yhoo/nas">YHOO</a>) implied volatility elevated at 40. YHOO is recently down 37 cents to $22.95. YHOO overall option implied volatility of 40 is above its 26-week average of 35 according to Track Data, suggesting larger risk.</p>
<p><strong><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/microsoft-corporation/msft/nas">Microsoft</a></strong> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/microsoft-corporation/msft/nas">MSFT</a>) implied volatility elevated at 40. MSFT is recently down 19 cents to $27.91. MSFT overall option implied volatility of 40 is above its 26-week average of 23 according to Track Data, suggesting larger risk.</p>
<p><strong><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/amgen-inc/amgn/nas">Amgen</a></strong> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/amgen-inc/amgn/nas">AMGN</a>) implied volatility elevated at 34 after restructuring. AMGN is recently down $1.57 to $49.02. Goldman Sachs says: "Sales and costs in line. Maintain estimate and intrinsic value of $45." AMGN September option implied volatility of 34 is above its 26-week average of 26 according to Track Data, indicating larger risks.</p>
<p><strong><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/cisco-systems-inc/csco/nas">Cisco Systems</a></strong> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/cisco-systems-inc/csco/nas">CSCO</a>) implied volatility elevated at 34. CSCO is recently up 9 cents to $30.01. CSCO will be holding an analyst meeting on September 5 in San Jose. Jeffreies has a Buy rating on CSCO. CSCO September option implied volatility of 34 is above its 26-week average of 28 according to Track Data, suggesting slightly larger risk. </p>
<p><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/vix/nas">Volatility Index S&amp;P 500 Options</a>-<a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/vix/nas">VIX </a>up 2.68 to 33.35.</p>
<p><br /><em>Daily options Update is provided by Stock Specialist Paul Foster of theflyonthewall.com.</em></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/08/16/option-update-nasdaq-blue-chips-yhoo-msft-amgn-csco/">Option update: NASDAQ blue chips -- YHOO, MSFT, AMGN, CSCO</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 16 Aug 2007 13:50:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/08/16/option-update-nasdaq-blue-chips-yhoo-msft-amgn-csco/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/966914/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/08/16/option-update-nasdaq-blue-chips-yhoo-msft-amgn-csco/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>amgen</category><category>amgn</category><category>billion</category><category>bio</category><category>biology</category><category>biotech</category><category>Blue Chips</category><category>BlueChips</category><category>cisco systems</category><category>CiscoSystems</category><category>csco</category><category>doctor</category><category>enbrel</category><category>epogen</category><category>implied volatility</category><category>ImpliedVolatility</category><category>intrinsic value</category><category>IntrinsicValue</category><category>microsoft</category><category>msft</category><category>NASDAQ</category><category>neupogen</category><category>Restructuring</category><category>yahoo</category><category>yhoo</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Paul Foster]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 16 Aug 2007 13:50:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Johnson &amp; Johnson trimming workforce]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/07/31/johnson-and-johnson-trimming-workforce/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/07/31/johnson-and-johnson-trimming-workforce/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/07/31/johnson-and-johnson-trimming-workforce/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/competitive-strategy/" rel="tag">Competitive Strategy</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/employees/" rel="tag">Employees</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/jnj/" rel="tag">Johnson and Johnson (JNJ)</a></p><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/johnson-and-38-johnson/jnj/nys"><img width="240" vspace="4" hspace="4" height="67" border="0" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/07/jnj.jpg" />Johnson &amp; Johnson</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/johnson-and-38-johnson/jnj/nys">JNJ</a>), in an effort to prepare for the encroachment of generic competition and improve the health of its bottom line, said today that it would <a href="http://money.aol.com/news/articles/_a/drug-company-johnson-and-johnson-to-cut/n20070731094809990008" target="_blank">reduce its workforce</a> by 3-4%. The move will affect roughly 3,615 to 4,820 jobs and will result in a restructuring cost of $550 million to $750 million, which will be swallowed in the second half of 2007. <br /><br />The majority of the cuts will come from the pharmaceuticals segment, as it suffers a number of patent expirations in the coming years. The restructuring move is expected to result in pretax, annual cost savings of $1.3 billion to $1.6 billion in 2008. <br /><br />The company also took this opportunity to reiterate its 2007 earnings forecast. Before items, the pharmaceutical heavyweight expects to earn between $4.02 and $4.07 per share, compared with year-ago profit of $3.76 per share. In other news, JNJ says it plans to consolidate some of its pharmaceutical operations as it funnels money into its drug pipeline. From 2008 to 2010, JNJ hopes to file applications for regulatory approval of <a href="http://money.cnn.com/news/newsfeeds/articles/newstex/AFX-0013-18543668.htm" target="_blank">7 to 10</a> new compounds. <br /><br />So far today, Wall Street is reacting positively to this news, sending the stock almost 2% higher. The stock has now edged above its 10-day moving average for the first time in two weeks, though it remains below its descending 10-week trendline. <br /><br /><em><em>Beth Gaston Moon is an analyst at </em><a href="http://www.schaeffersresearch.com/"><em>Schaeffer's Investment Research</em></a><em>.</em></em><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/07/31/johnson-and-johnson-trimming-workforce/">Johnson &amp; Johnson trimming workforce</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 31 Jul 2007 11:20:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://money.aol.com/news/articles/_a/drug-company-johnson-and-johnson-to-cut/n20070731094809990008>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/07/31/johnson-and-johnson-trimming-workforce/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/954310/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/07/31/johnson-and-johnson-trimming-workforce/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>inthenews</category><category>JNJ</category><category>layoffs</category><category>restructuring</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Beth Gaston Moon]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 31 Jul 2007 11:20:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[The big six U.S. banks: Is it time to buy?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/07/14/the-big-six-u-s-banks-is-it-time-to-buy/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/07/14/the-big-six-u-s-banks-is-it-time-to-buy/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/07/14/the-big-six-u-s-banks-is-it-time-to-buy/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/forecasts/" rel="tag">Forecasts</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/industry/" rel="tag">Industry</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/c/" rel="tag">Citigroup Inc. (C)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/jpm/" rel="tag">JPMorgan Chase (JPM)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/bac/" rel="tag">Bank of America (BAC)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/wb/" rel="tag">Wachovia Corp (WB)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/wm/" rel="tag">Washington Mutual (WM)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/wfc/" rel="tag">Wells Fargo (WFC)</a></p><p>The Dow Jones is up over 11% for the year so far and the euphoria on Wall Street has certainly hit Main Street. The one sector that has not participated in this rally is major U.S., large-cap banks. The stock performance of the major six banks has been as low as down 10% to flat -- in other words lousy. The six major banks are <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/citigroup-incorporated/c/nys">Citigroup</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/citigroup-incorporated/c/nys">C</a>),<a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/bank-of-america-corporation/bac/nys"> Bank of America</a> (NYSE:<a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/bank-of-america-corporation/bac/nys"> BAC</a>), <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/wells-fargo-and-38-co-new/wfc/nys">Wells Fargo</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/wells-fargo-and-38-co-new/wfc/nys">WFC</a>), <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/wachovia-corporation/wb/nys">Wachovia</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/wachovia-corporation/wb/nys">WB</a>) and <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/washington-mutual-incorporated/wm/nys">Washington Mutual</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/washington-mutual-incorporated/wm/nys">WM</a>) and <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/jp-morgan-chase-and-38-co/jpm/nys">JP Morgan Chase</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/jp-morgan-chase-and-38-co/jpm/nys">JPM</a>). So is time to start nibbling away at these stocks?</p>
<p>The central issue is the state of the subprime mortgage market. All of these banks are major mortgage players in the United States, from coast to coast. As the earnings season was approaching with first quarter results, many thought the answers would be evident and that the issue would be a memory. All six reported very good, solid first quarter results, and reserve requirements were raised for the year to absorb defaulted mortgages. Washington Mutual explained that they were aggressively working with the subprime customers to refinance their loans before the problems got worse. Wells Fargo, Bank of America, and Wachovia followed suit. </p>
<p>The earnings were strong for the first quarter and guidance for the calender year 2007 stayed the same, no lowering of forward expectations. Dividends are absolutely solid in terms of earnings/dividend coverage, and the yields are mouth-watering. The yields on the big six range from 3.2% to 5.2%.</p>
<p>The stocks have been flat to down as the mortgage issue is not yet totally resolved. The housing market is still a troubling aspect of the economy, with no real relief in sight until at least 2008. That factor has kept these stocks depressed. But remember, you want to buy when no one else is.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/07/14/the-big-six-u-s-banks-is-it-time-to-buy/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>The big six U.S. banks: Is it time to buy?</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/07/14/the-big-six-u-s-banks-is-it-time-to-buy/">The big six U.S. banks: Is it time to buy?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Sat, 14 Jul 2007 09:40:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/07/14/the-big-six-u-s-banks-is-it-time-to-buy/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/940489/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/07/14/the-big-six-u-s-banks-is-it-time-to-buy/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>BAC</category><category>bad debts</category><category>Bank of America</category><category>big six banks</category><category>Citigroup</category><category>dividend yields</category><category>dividends</category><category>Georges Yared</category><category>GeorgesYared</category><category>housing market</category><category>JP Morgan Chase</category><category>JPM</category><category>JpMorganChase</category><category>large-cap banks</category><category>Large-capBanks</category><category>major mortgage players</category><category>MajorMortgagePlayers</category><category>mortgage lenders</category><category>mortgage underwriting</category><category>MortgageUnderwriting</category><category>restructuring</category><category>subprime lending</category><category>Wachovia</category><category>WB</category><category>Wells Fargo</category><category>WFC</category><category>Yared Investment Research</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Georges Yared]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 14 Jul 2007 09:40:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Nokia lifted by restructuring plan]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/06/20/nokia-lifted-by-restructuring-plan/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/06/20/nokia-lifted-by-restructuring-plan/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/06/20/nokia-lifted-by-restructuring-plan/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/management/" rel="tag">Management</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/nok/" rel="tag">Nokia Corp. (NOK)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/options/" rel="tag">Options</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/analysis/" rel="tag">Technical Analysis</a></p><a target="_blank" href="http://www.nokia.com/investors"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/06/nok-logo.jpg" /></a><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/nokia-corporation/nok/nys">Nokia Corp.</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/nokia-corporation/nok/nys">NOK</a>) opened at $29.14. So far today the stock has hit a low of $28.79 and a high of $29.19. As of 10:55, NOK is trading at $28.81, up $0.20 (0.7%).<br /><br />The stock has been rising steadily over the last six months, hitting a new 52-week high today after announcing a <a href="http://money.aol.com/news/articles/_a/nokia-to-renew-company-structure-to/n20070620075409990002">corporate restructuring plan</a>. Recent technical indicators for NOK have been bullish but deteriorating slightly, while <a target="_blank" href="http://www.iotogo.com/spoutlookonline">S&amp;P</a> gives the stock a neutral 3 STARS (out of 5) hold rating.<br /><br />For a bullish hedged play on this stock, I would consider an October <a target="_blank" href="http://www.iotogo.com/HSCS">bull-put credit spread</a> below the $25 range. NOK hasn't been below $25 since April and has shown support around $28 recently. This trade could be risky if recent bullish run turns out to be a fake-out, but even if that happens, this position could be protected by the three levels of support the stock found just between $25 and $28 over the past two months.<br /><br /><em>Brent Archer is an options analyst and writer at <a target="_blank" href="http://www.iotogo.com/aolblogba">Investors Observer</a>. DISCLOSURE: Mr. Archer owns and/or controls diversified portfolios of long and short stock and option positions that may include holdings in companies he writes about. At publication time, Brent neither owns nor controls a position in NOK.</em><br /><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/06/20/nokia-lifted-by-restructuring-plan/">Nokia lifted by restructuring plan</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 20 Jun 2007 12:46:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/06/20/nokia-lifted-by-restructuring-plan/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/922331/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/06/20/nokia-lifted-by-restructuring-plan/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Investors Observer</category><category>InvestorsObserver</category><category>NOK</category><category>Nokia</category><category>options</category><category>restructuring</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Brent Archer]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 20 Jun 2007 12:46:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Short Stories: Bally goes belly up, yielding 736% return for shorts]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/06/02/short-stores-bally-goes-belly-up-yielding-600-return-for-shor/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/06/02/short-stores-bally-goes-belly-up-yielding-600-return-for-shor/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/06/02/short-stores-bally-goes-belly-up-yielding-600-return-for-shor/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/shortstories/" rel="tag">Short Stories</a></p><p><em><img style="WIDTH: 112px; HEIGHT: 151px" height="119" alt="" hspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/04/psc-pec3.jpg" width="108" align="right" vspace="4" border="1" />Although short selling -- the practice of selling borrowed shares with the hope of repaying the loan by buying back the shares at a lower price -- goes against the American belief that stocks always go up, I have long been fascinated with it. <strong>Short Stories</strong> discusses what works, what doesn't, and what some of the leading lights in shorting stocks think about its opportunities and threats. I describe possible short trades and I seek your comments and questions for story ideas. I don't offer any investment advice and I don't trade on any of the posts I write.</em> </p>
<p>I first suggested selling short <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/bally-total-fitness-holding-corporation/bfth/nao">Bally Total Fitness, Inc.</a> (Pink Sheets: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/bally-total-fitness-holding-corporation/bfth/nao">BFTH</a>) <a href="http://ctas.bloggingstocks.com/2006/11/06/short-stories-ballys-sudden-cardiac-arrest/">last November</a> at $2.59. Why? Bally owed $512 million this year, was spending $7 million more cash than it was taking in, and I doubted that banks would lend it enough money to stay afloat. Back then my biggest concern for the short position was that hedge fund billionaire Stevie Cohen had placed a big bullish bet on Bally -- his SAC Capital Advisors owned 6.9% of the company. I figured he must know something that I didn't.</p>
<p>But on Thursday, Cohen's bet went bust as Bally <a href="http://www.azcentral.com/arizonarepublic/business/articles/0601biz-bally01-ON.html">filed for bankruptcy</a>. According to its filing, "Under the prepackaged restructuring plan, there will be a reduction in the principal outstanding on Bally's existing senior subordinated notes by $150 million by exchanging all existing senior subordinated notes for a new class of notes, common equity and the right to participate in a $77.5 million rights offering."</p>
<p>SAC's wipe out provides a useful insight for investors -- even the most talented players make mistakes. It's just that they make more good calls than bad ones. Meanwhile, those who followed my suggestion to short Bally could cover their position on Monday at $0.31 a share, <strong>pocketing a 736% return</strong> -- not bad for eight month's work.</p>
<p><em>Peter Cohan is President of</em> <a href="http://petercohan.com/"><em>Peter S. Cohan &amp; Associates</em></a><em>, a management consulting and venture capital firm. He also </em><a href="http://www3.babson.edu/Academics/Divisions/management/facultyprofile.cfm?pageid=391236"><em>teaches management at Babson College</em></a><em> and edits </em><a href="http://petercohan.blogspot.com/2007/01/cohan-letter-up-15-in-2006.html"><em>The Cohan Letter</em></a><em>. He has no financial interest in Bally.</em></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/06/02/short-stores-bally-goes-belly-up-yielding-600-return-for-shor/">Short Stories: Bally goes belly up, yielding 736% return for shorts</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Sat, 02 Jun 2007 09:30:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/06/02/short-stores-bally-goes-belly-up-yielding-600-return-for-shor/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/909097/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/06/02/short-stores-bally-goes-belly-up-yielding-600-return-for-shor/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Bally Total Fitness</category><category>BallyTotalFitness</category><category>bankruptcy</category><category>Peter Cohan</category><category>restructuring</category><category>SAC Capital Advisors</category><category>Short Stories</category><category>ShortStories</category><category>Stevie Cohen</category><category>The Cohan Letter</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Peter Cohan]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 02 Jun 2007 09:30:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[A good time to buy HealthSouth]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/05/08/a-good-time-to-buy-healthsouth/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/05/08/a-good-time-to-buy-healthsouth/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/05/08/a-good-time-to-buy-healthsouth/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/good-news/" rel="tag">Good news</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/management/" rel="tag">Management</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/bargain-stocks/" rel="tag">Bargain Stocks</a></p><a href="http://www.theflyonthewall.com/splashPage.php?source=AOL"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/05/fly-logo-(aol).gif" alt="" /></a><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/healthsouth-corporation/hls/nys">HealthSouth Corporation</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/healthsouth-corporation/hls/nys">HLS</a>), the Alabama-based rehabilitation company, is close to completing a massive restructuring after years of tough times.<br /><br />New management, three divestitures to be completed by the end of 2007 and a soon-to-be-more-friendly approach from Medicare and Medicaid, should allow this stock to perform nicely during the next three-to-five years.<br /><br />HealthSouth was a boom-bust stock as former CEO Richard Scrushy built the diversified healthcare company into one of the larger and faster growing healthcare companies in the US during the 1990s. However, a number of financial irregularities came back to haunt Scrushy and his shareholders, leading to the stock tanking.<br /><br />New management was brought in earlier this decade--well-respected execs from HCA--who first had to address the legal and accounting issues that plagued the company. Then last year the company announced it would begin selling non-core assets and become a focused rehab business.<br /><br />The divestitures are for the most part completed and now the last part of the puzzle needs to be put in place. Medicare and Medicaid need to get the correct reimbursement rates so this very important industry can serve customers effectively and earn a return on investment. As boomers get older and stay more active, the rehab service that HealthSouth provides will become more and more important.<br /><br />HealthSouth's stock ran up to $25 in anticipation of its three divestitures but has sold off to $20.50. Use this weakness to buy the stock, this could be a multi-bagger in the next few years.<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/05/08/a-good-time-to-buy-healthsouth/">A good time to buy HealthSouth</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 08 May 2007 16:30:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/05/08/a-good-time-to-buy-healthsouth/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/891514/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/05/08/a-good-time-to-buy-healthsouth/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>divestiture</category><category>HealthSouth</category><category>HealthSouth Corp</category><category>HealthSouth Corporation</category><category>HealthsouthCorp</category><category>HealthsouthCorporation</category><category>HLS</category><category>Medicaid</category><category>Medicare</category><category>restructuring</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Eric Buscemi]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 08 May 2007 16:30:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[13,000 jobs later and DCX reaches new five-year highs]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/02/14/13-000-jobs-later-and-dcx-reaches-new-five-year-highs/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/02/14/13-000-jobs-later-and-dcx-reaches-new-five-year-highs/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/02/14/13-000-jobs-later-and-dcx-reaches-new-five-year-highs/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/major-movement/" rel="tag">Major Movement</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/industry/" rel="tag">Industry</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/dai/" rel="tag">Daimler (DAI)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/f/" rel="tag">Ford Motor (F)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/gm/" rel="tag">General Motors (GM)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/employees/" rel="tag">Employees</a></p>DaimlerChrysler (NYSE:<a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/daimlerchrysler-ag/dcx/nys">DCX</a>) shares soared into new highs it hasn't seen since early 2000. DCX was gaining 4.27% to $67.20 around 10:30 a.m.. And it only took <a href="http://today.reuters.com/news/articlehybrid.aspx?type=comktNews&amp;rpc=33&amp;storyid=2007-02-14T144035Z_01_N14309347_RTRIDST_0_DAIMLERCHRYSLER-RESTRUCTURING-UPDATE-1.XML">13,000 workers losing their jobs</a>. On Valentine's day. Talk about stocks to love.<br /><br />13,000 workers is 16% of Chrysler's work force. It was only this morning that I <a href="http://dcx.bloggingstocks.com/2007/02/14/before-the-bell-2-14-07-futures-higher-before-bernanke-chrysle/">wrote</a> analysts were expecting a 10,000 jobs cut as well as some 1,000-1,500 salaried workers in Chrysler's attempt to cut costs by more than $2 billion, or $1,000 for every car sold in the U.S. Now, the talk is of cutting $1.3 billion with 11,000 hourly workers being eliminated.<br /><br />The restructuring plan would include a $3 billion investment in new engines, transmissions and axles. Makes sense after DCX <a href="http://dcx.bloggingstocks.com/2007/02/14/before-the-bell-2-14-07-ibm-dcx-ebay-f-twx/">reported</a> Chrysler Group's full-year loss was &euro;1.12 billion, ($1.45 billion), was especially hurt by declining sales in pickup trucks and SUVs.<br /><br />Included in the restructuring plans:<br />
<ul>
    <li>material cost savings of up to $1.5 billion by 2009</li>
    <li>eliminating production shifts</li>
    <li>reducing total production capacity by 400,000 vehicles on an annual basis</li>
    <li>idling its Newark, Delaware, assembly plant which employs about 2,000</li>
</ul>
It is still unclear, however, whether DaimlerChrysler is considering parting company with its money-losing U.S. division, especially after comments about "strategic options" were made.<br /><br />Year-to-date, General Motors Corp. (NYSE:GM) shares gained over 19%, Ford Motor Co. (NYSE:F) shares over 14% and DCX shares over 9%. 80,000 factory jobs were cut in the past year in all three companies. But, it would probably have ended up being more had these measures not been taken.<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/02/14/13-000-jobs-later-and-dcx-reaches-new-five-year-highs/">13,000 jobs later and DCX reaches new five-year highs</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 14 Feb 2007 11:43:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://today.reuters.com/news/articlehybrid.aspx?type=comktNews&amp;rpc=33&amp;storyid=2007-02-14T144035Z_01_N14309347_RTRIDST_0_DAIMLERCHRYSLER-RESTRUCTURING-UPDATE-1.XML>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/02/14/13-000-jobs-later-and-dcx-reaches-new-five-year-highs/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/753902/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/02/14/13-000-jobs-later-and-dcx-reaches-new-five-year-highs/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>chrysler group</category><category>ChryslerGroup</category><category>daimlerchrysler</category><category>dcx</category><category>f</category><category>gm</category><category>restructuring</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Melly Alazraki]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 14 Feb 2007 11:43:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[The world after leveraged buyouts]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/11/14/the-world-after-leverage-buyouts/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/11/14/the-world-after-leverage-buyouts/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/11/14/the-world-after-leverage-buyouts/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/forecasts/" rel="tag">Forecasts</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/deals/" rel="tag">Deals</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/privateequity/" rel="tag">Private Equity</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/gs/" rel="tag">Goldman Sachs Group (GS)</a></p><p><img id="vimage_1" alt="" hspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2006/11/perella.bmp" align="right" vspace="4" border="1" /></p>
<p>Back in June, a new investment bank got its start: <a href="http://www.pwpartners.com/">Perella Weinberg Partners</a>. The firm raised about $1.1 billion and hired some high-profile veterans of Wall Street.</p>
<p>Well, this week, the firm purchased Kramer Capital Partners. The firm specializes in so-called "transformational corporate transactions." </p>
<p>What does this mean? This is when a company has lots of troubles and needs a workout.</p>
<p>Kramer has engagements on such restructurings as <a href="http://www.delta.com">Delta's</a> (OTC:DALRQ) bankruptcy, <a href="http://www.towerautomotive.com">Tower Automotive</a> (OTC:TWRA), and <a href="http://www.monsanto.com">Monsanto's</a> (NYSE:MON) restructuring of Solutia.</p>
<p>Basically, the "smart money" is thinking that the current mega trend of leverage buyouts is going to result in major problems - which, of course, will need the help of Wall Street advisors.</p>
<p>Another firm is also positioning itself for the trend: <a href="http://www.gs.com">Goldman Sachs</a> (NYSE:GS).<br /><br />For example, according to a recent <a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&amp;sid=a60lKBhtDhPg&amp;refer=home">report</a> from Bloomberg, Goldman Sachs provided $685 million for Wilbur Ross's deals. Yes, Ross is a specialist in bankruptcies.</p>
<p><em>Tom Taulli is the author of various books, including the Complete M&amp;A Handbook and operates InvestorOffering.com.</em></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/11/14/the-world-after-leverage-buyouts/">The world after leveraged buyouts</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 14 Nov 2006 12:15:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/11/14/the-world-after-leverage-buyouts/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/701683/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/11/14/the-world-after-leverage-buyouts/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Goldman Sachs</category><category>GoldmanSachs</category><category>Kramer Capital</category><category>KramerCapital</category><category>Perella Weinberg</category><category>PerellaWeinberg</category><category>private equity</category><category>PrivateEquity</category><category>Restructuring</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tom Taulli]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 14 Nov 2006 12:15:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Time Inc's cost cutting taboo]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/09/07/time-warners-cost-cutting-taboo/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/09/07/time-warners-cost-cutting-taboo/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/09/07/time-warners-cost-cutting-taboo/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/management/" rel="tag">Management</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/industry/" rel="tag">Industry</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/competitive-strategy/" rel="tag">Competitive Strategy</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/twx/" rel="tag">Time Warner (TWX)</a></p><p><img id="vimage_1" alt="" hspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2006/09/312633431.jpg" align="right" vspace="4" border="1" />One of the issues that <a title="http://finance.google.com/finance?cid=655621" href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/time-warner-inc/twx/nys">Time Warner Inc. (NYSE:TWX)</a> faces as it tries to improve margins is the bias against cutting editorial costs at well-known media properties. The Grahams face the same issue at The Washington Post Company (NYSE:WPO) and the Sulzbergers are up against the same wall at The New York Times Company (NYSE:NYT). Fortunately for the <em>Washington Post</em>, most of its revenues now come from its online education businesses, like Kaplan. Lucky for them.</p>
<p>For decades big, widely distributed editorial operations have been viewed as something of a public trust. Even some of the network news operations fell into this category until Bill Paley died. Then Larry Tisch came in and cut with a vengeance. Entire editorial bureaus were closed.</p>
<p>From the time that Henry Luce and his partners started <em>Time Magazine</em> in 1923 until <em>Life Magazine</em> was closed in 1972, Time, Inc. did not shutter any of its major publications. If Luce had not died in 1967, <em>Life</em> may have survived.</p>
<p>At companies where editorial standards are a bit more "flexible," cutting is no big deal. Dean Singleton has made a career of buying large city dailies and cutting their costs, including newsrooms, to the bone. He has purchased newspapers in markets as large as Dallas, Denver, and Oakland. If the papers do not make money, he closes them.</p>
<p><em>Time Magazine</em>, <em>Newsweek</em>, <em>The New York Times</em>, and <em>The Washington Post</em> are institutions with lives that are measured as much in reputation as they are in economic success. And it is probably less popular with the press when their brethren are let go than it is with, say, auto workers. And there is nothing amiss with looking out for your own.</p>
<p>It is almost inevitable that Parsons &amp; Co. are looking at the number of bureaus that Time has, and the number of senior editors, as well as the number of writers at <em>People</em> and <em>Sports Illustrated</em>. Why? Because these magazines, perhaps with the exception of the gossip found in <em>People</em>, are no longer the primary source of news. They may have been twenty years ago, or even ten. But that rationale has lost its teeth.</p>
<p>While it is hard to say that anything is inevitable, the clash of the dropping margins at Time, Inc. and the large editorial staffs at the magazine is coming. And if shareholder pressure keeps up, it may come soon.</p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/09/07/time-warners-cost-cutting-taboo/">Time Inc's cost cutting taboo</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 07 Sep 2006 14:39:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/09/07/time-warners-cost-cutting-taboo/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/665298/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/09/07/time-warners-cost-cutting-taboo/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>new york times</category><category>newsweek</category><category>NewYorkTimes</category><category>restructuring</category><category>time inc</category><category>time warner</category><category>TimeInc</category><category>TimeWarner</category><category>washington post</category><category>WashingtonPost</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Douglas McIntyre]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 07 Sep 2006 14:39:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[RadioShack: You're fired! (via email)]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/08/31/radioshack-youre-fired-via-email/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/08/31/radioshack-youre-fired-via-email/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/08/31/radioshack-youre-fired-via-email/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/ebay/" rel="tag">eBay (EBAY)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/wmt/" rel="tag">Wal-Mart (WMT)</a></p><p><img id="vimage_4" alt="" hspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2006/08/radioshack.gif" align="right" vspace="4" border="1" /></p>
<p>Over the past few years, <a href="http://www.radioshack.com">RadioShack's</a> (RSH) stock has seen a steady decline. Then again, the company looks like it is still stuck in the 1970s. Why go to RadioShack when you can get much more selection at places like <a href="http://www.bestbuy.com">Best Buy</a> or <a href="http://www.circuitcity.com">Circuit City</a> or even <a href="http://www.wal-mart.com">Wal-Mart</a>?</p>
<p>True, the company has tried to do some innovative things, such as cutting a VOIP deal with <a href="http://www.skype.com">Skype</a> (which is a division of <a href="http://www.ebay.com">eBay</a>). But, the fact remains that the value proposition for customers is amorphous.</p>
<p>The company has also had a lot of drama in the boardroom. That is, the company's former CEO resigned because of errors on his resume. Also, he did not appear for court on a DWI (driving while intoxicated) charge.</p>
<p>So, within the past few months, RadioShack has finally realized the world has changed and it has, as a result, initiated a restructuring. It means closing stores and firing people.</p>
<p>Yesterday, RadioShack sent a cold email to roughly 400 employees. The gist: "The work force reduction notification is currently in progress. Unfortunately your position is one that has been eliminated." </p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/08/31/radioshack-youre-fired-via-email/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>RadioShack: You're fired! (via email)</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/08/31/radioshack-youre-fired-via-email/">RadioShack: You're fired! (via email)</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 31 Aug 2006 11:23:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/08/31/radioshack-youre-fired-via-email/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/661918/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/08/31/radioshack-youre-fired-via-email/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Best Buy</category><category>BestBuy</category><category>Circuit City</category><category>CircuitCity</category><category>Firing</category><category>RadioShack</category><category>Restructuring</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tom Taulli]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 31 Aug 2006 11:23:00 EST</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
