<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd">
<channel>
<title>BloggingStocks</title>
<link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com</link>
<description>BloggingStocks</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[News Corp. Should Get Rid of MySpace]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/07/10/news-corp-myspace/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/07/10/news-corp-myspace/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/07/10/news-corp-myspace/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/nws/" rel="tag">News Corp'B' (NWS)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/stock-picks/" rel="tag">Stock Picks</a></p><p><img alt="MySpace logo" hspace="4" align="right" vspace="4" border="1" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2010/07/myspace-logo.jpg" />News Corp. (<a class="inlinked" href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/news-corporation/nws/nas">NWS</a>) and MySpace. They've been together for a while. And I have a question: Should they still be together? Is there any reason for the social networking business to be in Rupert Murdoch's empire? Personally, I don't see a rationale for keeping MySpace in the fold.</p>
<p>Of course, I'm sure Chief Digital Officer Jonathan Miller has a different opinion. In fact, in the following Reuters article, he denies rumors concerning a desire on the part of News Corp. to sell the asset. Too bad, because I think it should be sold. Seriously, my sympathies go out to anyone in charge of bringing MySpace back to relevancy.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/07/10/news-corp-myspace/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>News Corp. Should Get Rid of MySpace</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/07/10/news-corp-myspace/">News Corp. Should Get Rid of MySpace</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Sat, 10 Jul 2010 12:10:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/07/10/news-corp-myspace/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19548801/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/07/10/news-corp-myspace/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>facebook</category><category>featured</category><category>myspace</category><category>news corp.</category><category>NWS</category><category>rupert murdoch</category><category>twitter</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Steven Mallas]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 10 Jul 2010 12:10:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Rupert Murdoch Looking for More Subscriber-Based Properties]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/06/15/news-corp-rupert-murdoch-may-be-on-to-something/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/06/15/news-corp-rupert-murdoch-may-be-on-to-something/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/06/15/news-corp-rupert-murdoch-may-be-on-to-something/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/deals/" rel="tag">Deals</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/products-and-services/" rel="tag">Products and Services</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/internet/" rel="tag">Internet</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/competitive-strategy/" rel="tag">Competitive Strategy</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/marketing-and-advertising/" rel="tag">Marketing and Advertising</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/nws/" rel="tag">News Corp'B' (NWS)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/entrepreneurs/" rel="tag">Entrepreneurs</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/stocks-to-buy/" rel="tag">Stocks to Buy</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/technology/" rel="tag">Technology</a></p><img border="1" hspace="4" alt="" vspace="4" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/12/rupert-murdoch.jpg" />Trading is upward and active today, on shares of Rupert Murdoch's News Corp. (<a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/news-corporation/nws/nas">NWS</a>). News Corp. shares have gained over 6%. The share hike is in reaction to News Corp.'s bid to completely swallow UK satellite service provider BSkyB. <a href="http://www.businessweek.com/news/2010-06-15/murdoch-s-bskyb-offer-fits-strategy-to-charge-for-news-movies.html">Bloomberg reports</a> that News Corp's current offer of $11.5 billion has been kindly rejected by BSkyB. Apparently, that company is asking for a bid increase of some 14%. Indications are that the negotiations are amicable and moving forward.<br />
<br />
The question is, has Rupert Murdoch lost his mind? I would have to say not. Murdoch has made it quite obvious that internet content by subscription shall be his unflinching business model. He's chosen his path, and he's sticking to it, come hell or high water.<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/06/15/news-corp-rupert-murdoch-may-be-on-to-something/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Rupert Murdoch Looking for More Subscriber-Based Properties</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/06/15/news-corp-rupert-murdoch-may-be-on-to-something/">Rupert Murdoch Looking for More Subscriber-Based Properties</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 15 Jun 2010 17:30:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.businessweek.com/news/2010-06-15/murdoch-s-bskyb-offer-fits-strategy-to-charge-for-news-movies.html>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/06/15/news-corp-rupert-murdoch-may-be-on-to-something/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19517351/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/06/15/news-corp-rupert-murdoch-may-be-on-to-something/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>BSkyB</category><category>inthenews</category><category>news services</category><category>paid content</category><category>Rupert Murdoch</category><category>subscription</category><category>subscription services</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Gary Sattler]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 15 Jun 2010 17:30:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[News Corp's Murdoch: Google Will Pay for News or Else]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/04/07/news-corps-murdoch-google-will-pay-for-news-or-else/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/04/07/news-corps-murdoch-google-will-pay-for-news-or-else/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/04/07/news-corps-murdoch-google-will-pay-for-news-or-else/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/competitive-strategy/" rel="tag">Competitive Strategy</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/nws/" rel="tag">News Corp'B' (NWS)</a></p><p><img hspace="4" border="0" align="right" vspace="4" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2010/04/news.jpg" />News Corp. (<a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/news-corporation/nws/nas">NWS</a>) has been butting heads with Google (<a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/google-inc/goog/nas">GOOG</a>) for quite a long time now. Google News, which automatically aggregates news sources from around the globe and presents users with a central news dashboard, has been criticized by multiple news sources as a leecher of content that it does not pay for. That's an <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/10/23/is-google-immoral-brian-and-melly-argue-the-point/">argument from way back</a>.</p>
<p>But News Corp. chief Rupert Murdoch, whose personal mission is to make everything produced by his company a pay event while much of the other news sources give away information for free, is again stating that Google needs to pay for the content it aggregates and presents.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/04/07/news-corps-murdoch-google-will-pay-for-news-or-else/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>News Corp's Murdoch: Google Will Pay for News or Else</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/04/07/news-corps-murdoch-google-will-pay-for-news-or-else/">News Corp's Murdoch: Google Will Pay for News or Else</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 07 Apr 2010 14:45:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.marketwatch.com/story/news-corp-chief-google-to-stop-getting-free-news-2010-04-06>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/04/07/news-corps-murdoch-google-will-pay-for-news-or-else/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19429646/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/04/07/news-corps-murdoch-google-will-pay-for-news-or-else/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>GOOG</category><category>Google News</category><category>inthenews</category><category>News Corp Google</category><category>News Corp.</category><category>NWS</category><category>Rupert Murdoch</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Brian White]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 07 Apr 2010 14:45:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Should 'Avatar' Be Rushed to DVD Now That It Is in Second Place?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/02/08/should-avatar-be-rushed-to-dvd-now-that-it-is-in-second-place/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/02/08/should-avatar-be-rushed-to-dvd-now-that-it-is-in-second-place/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/02/08/should-avatar-be-rushed-to-dvd-now-that-it-is-in-second-place/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/ge/" rel="tag">General Electric (GE)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/dis/" rel="tag">Walt Disney (DIS)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/sne/" rel="tag">Sony Corp ADR (SNE)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/nws/" rel="tag">News Corp'B' (NWS)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/film/" rel="tag">Film</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/lgf/" rel="tag">Lions Gate Entertainment (LGF)</a></p><p><img hspace="4" height="180" width="240" vspace="4" border="1" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/06/vizio.gif" /> We all knew News Corp.'s (<a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/news-corporation/nws/nas">NWS</a>) <em>Avatar</em> would cede the top spot to some film someday. To be honest, I didn't think Sony's (<a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/sony-corporation/sne/nys">SNE</a>) <em>Dear John</em> would be the one to do it.</p>
<p>According to <a href="http://boxofficemojo.com/weekend/chart/">Box Office Mojo</a>, <em>John</em> grossed roughly $32 million at domestic theaters. That was more than enough to put the sci-fi flick in second place. However, no one should feel sad for News Corp.; <em>Avatar</em>'s worldwide haul now stands at over <a href="http://boxofficemojo.com/movies/?id=avatar.htm">$2.2 billion</a>.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/02/08/should-avatar-be-rushed-to-dvd-now-that-it-is-in-second-place/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Should 'Avatar' Be Rushed to DVD Now That It Is in Second Place?</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/02/08/should-avatar-be-rushed-to-dvd-now-that-it-is-in-second-place/">Should 'Avatar' Be Rushed to DVD Now That It Is in Second Place?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 08 Feb 2010 16:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://boxofficemojo.com/weekend/chart/>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/02/08/should-avatar-be-rushed-to-dvd-now-that-it-is-in-second-place/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19349291/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/02/08/should-avatar-be-rushed-to-dvd-now-that-it-is-in-second-place/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Avatar</category><category>box office</category><category>BoxOffice</category><category>dear john</category><category>DearJohn</category><category>DIS</category><category>Disney</category><category>GE</category><category>general electric</category><category>GeneralElectric</category><category>Hulu</category><category>inthenews</category><category>LGF</category><category>lions gate entertainment</category><category>LionsGateEntertainment</category><category>nbc universal</category><category>NbcUniversal</category><category>news corp.</category><category>NewsCorp.</category><category>NWS</category><category>rupert murdoch</category><category>RupertMurdoch</category><category>SNE</category><category>Sony</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Steven Mallas]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 08 Feb 2010 16:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[News Corp.'s 'Avatar' Isn't Ready to Step Down]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/02/01/news-corp-s-avatar-isnt-ready-to-step-down/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/02/01/news-corp-s-avatar-isnt-ready-to-step-down/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/02/01/news-corp-s-avatar-isnt-ready-to-step-down/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/twx/" rel="tag">Time Warner (TWX)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/dis/" rel="tag">Walt Disney (DIS)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/nws/" rel="tag">News Corp'B' (NWS)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/film/" rel="tag">Film</a></p><p><img hspace="4" border="1" align="right" vspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2010/01/avatar-movie-poster.jpg" alt="" />Did you think Mel Gibson had a chance this past weekend? Probably not. By now, we're all used to seeing News Corp.s (<a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/news-corporation/nws/nas">NWS</a>) <em>Avatar</em> take the top spot. And for those keeping score, this is the seventh victory in a row for James Cameron (who, by the way, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/01/31/entrepreneurs-journal-business-lessons-from-avatars-james-cam/">may offer lessons for entrepreneurs</a>, according to Tom Taulli).</p>
<p>According to early estimates from <a href="http://boxofficemojo.com/weekend/chart/">Box Office Mojo</a>, <em>Avatar</em> made another $30 million at domestic theaters over the past three days. At the time of this writing, the worldwide gross was just under $2 billion (it will definitely go over $2 billion, don't worry). Time Warner's (<a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/time-warner-inc/twx/nys">TWX</a>) <em>Edge of Darkness</em>, starring the aforementioned Gibson, wasn't even close to a challenge for the 3-D aliens. Give it some credit, though: It came in second with $17 million.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/02/01/news-corp-s-avatar-isnt-ready-to-step-down/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>News Corp.'s 'Avatar' Isn't Ready to Step Down</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/02/01/news-corp-s-avatar-isnt-ready-to-step-down/">News Corp.'s 'Avatar' Isn't Ready to Step Down</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 01 Feb 2010 08:30:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://boxofficemojo.com/weekend/chart/>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/02/01/news-corp-s-avatar-isnt-ready-to-step-down/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19339017/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/02/01/news-corp-s-avatar-isnt-ready-to-step-down/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Avatar</category><category>box office</category><category>BoxOffice</category><category>DIS</category><category>Disney</category><category>edge of darkness</category><category>EdgeOfDarkness</category><category>featured</category><category>james cameron</category><category>JamesCameron</category><category>mel gibson</category><category>MelGibson</category><category>news corp.</category><category>NewsCorp.</category><category>NWS</category><category>rupert murdoch</category><category>RupertMurdoch</category><category>time warner</category><category>TimeWarner</category><category>TWX</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Steven Mallas]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 01 Feb 2010 08:30:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Time, News Corp, Hearst, and others to compete with Kindle]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/09/time-news-corp-hearst-and-others-to-compete-with-kindle/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/09/time-news-corp-hearst-and-others-to-compete-with-kindle/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/09/time-news-corp-hearst-and-others-to-compete-with-kindle/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/magazines/" rel="tag">Magazines</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/twx/" rel="tag">Time Warner (TWX)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/amzn/" rel="tag">Amazon.com (AMZN)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/sne/" rel="tag">Sony Corp ADR (SNE)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/nws/" rel="tag">News Corp'B' (NWS)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/media-world/" rel="tag">Media World</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/technology/" rel="tag">Technology</a></p><p><img alt="" hspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2009/02/amzn-kindle.jpg" align="right" vspace="4" border="1" />Five of the largest companies in the print business are testing the digital waters together. Rather than yield their content to alien formats, Time Inc. (<a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/time-warner-inc/twx/nys" target="_blank">TWX</a>), News Corp. (<a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/news-corporation/nws/nas" target="_blank">NWS</a>), Conde Nast, Hearst and Meredith Corp. <a href="http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/34329485/ns/technology_and_science-tech_and_gadgets/" target="_blank">have announced plans to develop a digital content format of their own</a>. This new product would compete with the newly released Nook from Barnes &amp; Noble (<a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/barnes-and-noble-inc/bks/nys" target="_blank">BKS</a>), as well as one from Sony (<a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/sony-corporation/sne/nys" target="_blank">SNE</a>) and the industry-leading Kindle from Amazon (<a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/amazon-com-inc/amzn/nas" target="_blank">AMZN</a>). The new <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/tag/ereader/">e-reader</a> content will come in color and in a format that would work across several devices.</p>
<p>The five media companies are equal partners in this joint venture, which will allow publishers to set their own prices for their content -- an obvious response to what they see as unfavorable revenue share deals offered by Amazon earlier this year. <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/tag/RupertMurdoch/">Rupert Murdoch</a> has been particularly vocal on this issue, particularly about the fact that News Corp. only receives a little more than a third of the $14.99 a month it costs to subscribe to the <em><a href="http://www.wsj.com" target="_blank">Wall Street Journal</a></em> on a <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/tag/Kindle/">Kindle</a>. He says of the device that it's "a fantastic invention for reading books. It is not much of an experience for newspapers."<br /><br /><br /></p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/09/time-news-corp-hearst-and-others-to-compete-with-kindle/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Time, News Corp, Hearst, and others to compete with Kindle</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/09/time-news-corp-hearst-and-others-to-compete-with-kindle/">Time, News Corp, Hearst, and others to compete with Kindle</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 09 Dec 2009 09:30:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/34329485/ns/technology_and_science-tech_and_gadgets/>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/09/time-news-corp-hearst-and-others-to-compete-with-kindle/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19271034/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/09/time-news-corp-hearst-and-others-to-compete-with-kindle/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>amazon</category><category>Amazon Kindle</category><category>amazon.com</category><category>barnes and noble</category><category>Barnes and Noble Nook</category><category>conde nast</category><category>CondeNast</category><category>e-readers</category><category>hearst</category><category>HearstCorp</category><category>inthenews</category><category>kindle</category><category>Meredith Corp.</category><category>news corp</category><category>nook</category><category>print media</category><category>rupert murdoch</category><category>smartphones</category><category>sne</category><category>SONY</category><category>tablet computers</category><category>TimeWarner</category><category>twx</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tom Johansmeyer]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 09 Dec 2009 09:30:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Google gives newspapers what they want]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/02/google-gives-newspapers-what-they-want/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/02/google-gives-newspapers-what-they-want/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/02/google-gives-newspapers-what-they-want/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/newspapers/" rel="tag">Newspapers</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/goog/" rel="tag">Google (GOOG)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/nws/" rel="tag">News Corp'B' (NWS)</a></p><p><img  border="1" hspace="4" vspace="4" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2009/12/google-logo-200x150.jpg" alt="" />Free content's getting locked down. Google (<a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/google-inc/goog/nas" target="_blank">GOOG</a>), which has been criticized by the newspaper industry for <strike>sending them traffic</strike> making it easy for readers to find the stories they want without forcing them to make a purchase, is <a href="http://blogs.usatoday.com/technologylive/2009/12/google-to-limit-free-newspaper-articles.html" target="_blank">starting to play ball with the print industry</a>. </p>
<p>What's the harm? The way things are going, Google will only have to be nice for a little while. Then, this latest defensive measure by the newspaper industry will have run its course, and Google will be free to do what it wants.</p>
<p> </p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/02/google-gives-newspapers-what-they-want/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Google gives newspapers what they want</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/02/google-gives-newspapers-what-they-want/">Google gives newspapers what they want</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 02 Dec 2009 11:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/02/google-gives-newspapers-what-they-want/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19261078/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/02/google-gives-newspapers-what-they-want/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>goog</category><category>google</category><category>GoogleNews</category><category>inthenews</category><category>News Corp.</category><category>NewsCorp.</category><category>newspaper industry</category><category>newspapers</category><category>NWS</category><category>rupert murdoch</category><category>wall street journal</category><category>wsj</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tom Johansmeyer]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 02 Dec 2009 11:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Microsoft and News Corp talk about pushing Google aside]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/23/microsoft-and-news-corp-talk-about-pushing-google-aside/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/23/microsoft-and-news-corp-talk-about-pushing-google-aside/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/23/microsoft-and-news-corp-talk-about-pushing-google-aside/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/internet/" rel="tag">Internet</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/goog/" rel="tag">Google (GOOG)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/msft/" rel="tag">Microsoft (MSFT)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/nws/" rel="tag">News Corp'B' (NWS)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/media-world/" rel="tag">Media World</a></p><p><img hspace="4" height="46" border="1" align="right" width="200" vspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/08/microsoft-msft-logo.jpg" alt="" />Often, we confuse winning with being the best. This isn't always the case. There are plenty of ways to get ahead when you don't have the top product on the market. The smoke-filled backroom meetings may be a thing of the past, but the net effect lingers. This is exactly what went down, <a href="http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/34099291/ns/business-us_business/" target="_blank">according to a Reuters report</a>, when Microsoft (<a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/microsoft-corporation/msft/nas" target="_blank">MSFT</a>) had a chat with News Corp (<a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/news-corporation/nws/nas" target="_blank">NWS</a>).</p>
<p>Microsoft suggested a relationship with News Corp which would involve the latter's yanking its news sites from Google (<a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/google-inc/goog/nas" target="_blank">GOOG</a>) ... for a fee, of course. This would cost the search engine giant -- which is also a news aggregation giant -- access to some hefty publications, including the <a href="http://www.wsj.com" target="_blank"><em>Wall Street Journal</em></a>, the <em><a href="http://www.thesun.co.uk/" target="_blank">Sun</a></em> and the <em><a href="http://www.nypost.com" target="_blank">New York Post</a></em>.</p>
<p> </p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/23/microsoft-and-news-corp-talk-about-pushing-google-aside/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Microsoft and News Corp talk about pushing Google aside</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/23/microsoft-and-news-corp-talk-about-pushing-google-aside/">Microsoft and News Corp talk about pushing Google aside</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 23 Nov 2009 09:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/34099291/ns/business-us_business/>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/23/microsoft-and-news-corp-talk-about-pushing-google-aside/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19250417/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/23/microsoft-and-news-corp-talk-about-pushing-google-aside/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Bing</category><category>goog</category><category>google</category><category>inthenews</category><category>Microsoft</category><category>MSFT</category><category>new york post</category><category>news</category><category>news corp</category><category>NewsCorp</category><category>newspaper</category><category>NewYorkPost</category><category>NWS</category><category>rupert murdoch</category><category>RupertMurdoch</category><category>wall street journal</category><category>WallStreetJournal</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tom Johansmeyer]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 09:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Amazon in the lead, but Kindle competition is coming]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/19/amazon-in-the-lead-but-kindle-competition-is-coming/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/19/amazon-in-the-lead-but-kindle-competition-is-coming/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/19/amazon-in-the-lead-but-kindle-competition-is-coming/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/aapl/" rel="tag">Apple Inc (AAPL)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/amzn/" rel="tag">Amazon.com (AMZN)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/sne/" rel="tag">Sony Corp ADR (SNE)</a></p><p><img border="1" hspace="4" alt="" vspace="4" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2009/02/amzn-kindle.jpg" />For retailers, the crucial season is on its way. Blow the <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/tag/Christmas/">Christmas</a> rush, and next year starts off on a miserable foot. Success, of course, also delivers a healthy dose of momentum -- and a little bit of wiggle room, important in what will continue to be a tough economy through at least the first half of next year. For <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/tag/booksellers/">booksellers</a>, now contending with a new variable in the form of digital readers, <a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/ousivMolt/idUSTRE59I01I20091019?pageNumber=2&amp;virtualBrandChannel=0" target="_blank">e-readers will play a major role in defining the winners and losers</a>. So far, it looks like <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/amazon-com-inc/amzn/nas" target="_blank">Amazon</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/amazon-com-inc/amzn/nas" target="_blank">AMZN</a>) is off to a great start, and it will take some genuine innovation for the competition to chip away at its market share.</p>
<p><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/barnes-and-noble-inc/bks/nys" target="_blank">Barnes &amp; Noble</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/barnes-and-noble-inc/bks/nys" target="_blank">BKS</a>), once the leading names in literary retail, is expected to release its own e-reader this week. It will look a bit like Amazon's Kindle, <a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/ousivMolt/idUSTRE59I01I20091019?pageNumber=2&amp;virtualBrandChannel=0" target="_blank">according to Reuters</a>, but with a touch screen intended to make the reader's experience easier. The price hasn't been disclosed yet, but rumor has it that it'll be higher than the <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/tag/Kindle/">Kindle</a>'s $259. BKS is staying mum on its plans in this space. There are others in the space, as well, including IREX Technologies, which is a spinoff of <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/koninklijke-philips-electronics-n-v/phg/nys" target="_blank">Royal Philips Electronics</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/koninklijke-philips-electronics-n-v/phg/nys" target="_blank">PHG</a>), Asutek (tk: tk) and a project called FirstPaper that has <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/tag/Hearst/">Hearst</a> behind it.</p>
<p> </p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/19/amazon-in-the-lead-but-kindle-competition-is-coming/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Amazon in the lead, but Kindle competition is coming</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/19/amazon-in-the-lead-but-kindle-competition-is-coming/">Amazon in the lead, but Kindle competition is coming</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 19 Oct 2009 08:40:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.reuters.com/article/ousivMolt/idUSTRE59I01I20091019?pageNumber=2&amp;virtualBrandChannel=0>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/19/amazon-in-the-lead-but-kindle-competition-is-coming/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19200269/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/19/amazon-in-the-lead-but-kindle-competition-is-coming/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>amazon</category><category>amazon kindle</category><category>amazon.com</category><category>AmazonKindle</category><category>amzn</category><category>barnes and noble</category><category>barnes and noble incorporated</category><category>BarnesAndNoble</category><category>BarnesAndNobleIncorporated</category><category>bks</category><category>booksellers</category><category>christmas</category><category>hearst</category><category>holiday</category><category>holiday shopping</category><category>holidays</category><category>HolidayShopping</category><category>inthenews</category><category>kindle</category><category>phg</category><category>philips electronics</category><category>PhilipsElectronics</category><category>rupert murdoch</category><category>RupertMurdoch</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tom Johansmeyer]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 19 Oct 2009 08:40:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Rupert Murdoch has it all wrong about fee-based web content]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/08/10/rupert-murdoch-has-it-all-wrong-about-fee-based-web-content/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/08/10/rupert-murdoch-has-it-all-wrong-about-fee-based-web-content/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/08/10/rupert-murdoch-has-it-all-wrong-about-fee-based-web-content/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/competitive-strategy/" rel="tag">Competitive Strategy</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/nws/" rel="tag">News Corp'B' (NWS)</a></p><p><img border="0" hspace="4" alt="" vspace="4" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2009/08/murd.jpg" />When <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/news-corporation/nws/nas">News Corp.</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/news-corporation/nws/nas">NWS</a>) outspoken Chairman Rupert Murdoch reversed himself recently and declared that all his company's web properties would soon move to a fee model, were you perplexed? After all, Murdoch runs one of the largest media empires on the planet. Combine that with a conditioned customer used to getting almost all content for free and yes, we have a problem.</p>
<p>Murdoch's empire just suffered an advertising meltdown with the rest of the world, with News Corp. declaring a huge decline in ad revenue for its latest quarter. Just a few years ago, Murdoch was toying with the idea of dropping the fee for looking at the <em>Wall Street Journal</em>'s articles and columns. <a href="http://articles.latimes.com/2007/sep/19/business/fi-dowjones19">He's done a 180 here</a> and wants to bring the <em>Journal</em>'s pay-per-use model to just about every web property his company owns while he shouts "<a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/media/2009/aug/06/rupert-murdoch-website-charges">quality journalism is not cheap</a>" from the rooftops of Fox News.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/08/10/rupert-murdoch-has-it-all-wrong-about-fee-based-web-content/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Rupert Murdoch has it all wrong about fee-based web content</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/08/10/rupert-murdoch-has-it-all-wrong-about-fee-based-web-content/">Rupert Murdoch has it all wrong about fee-based web content</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 10 Aug 2009 12:20:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/08/10/rupert-murdoch-has-it-all-wrong-about-fee-based-web-content/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19121283/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/08/10/rupert-murdoch-has-it-all-wrong-about-fee-based-web-content/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Fox News</category><category>inthenews</category><category>Murdoch</category><category>NWS</category><category>Pay websites</category><category>Rupert Murdoch</category><category>Wall Street journal</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Brian White]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 10 Aug 2009 12:20:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[News Corp.'s MySpace has cooled its heels, begins layoffs]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/06/18/news-corp-s-myspace-has-cooled-its-heels-begins-layoffs/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/06/18/news-corp-s-myspace-has-cooled-its-heels-begins-layoffs/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/06/18/news-corp-s-myspace-has-cooled-its-heels-begins-layoffs/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/competitive-strategy/" rel="tag">Competitive Strategy</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/nws/" rel="tag">News Corp'B' (NWS)</a></p><p><img border="0" hspace="4" alt="" vspace="4" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2009/06/ms.jpg" />When <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/news-corporation/nws/nas">News Corp.</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/news-corporation/nws/nas">NWS</a>) bought MySpace.com for over $500 million back in 2005, some said it was the way Rupert Murdoch would charge into the digital media audience business in a big way. While that was true at the time, the digital world and its audience can become fickle and change rapidly as new web-based properties develop. It's pretty obvious by now that <a href="http://www.latimes.com/business/la-fi-ct-myspace17-2009jun17,0,6726077.story">Facebook has leaped past MySpace</a> and is "the place" to be when it comes to social networking interaction (although Twitter is garnering all the buzz presently).</p>
<p>Why Did MySpace lose its way? MySpace evolved to become a portal, offering music downloads and other goodies, while Facebook kept its social networking status as a place where friends and associates could virtually connect. And there you have it -- MySpace didn't evolve as trends were created and rapidly changed.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/06/18/news-corp-s-myspace-has-cooled-its-heels-begins-layoffs/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>News Corp.'s MySpace has cooled its heels, begins layoffs</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/06/18/news-corp-s-myspace-has-cooled-its-heels-begins-layoffs/">News Corp.'s MySpace has cooled its heels, begins layoffs</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 18 Jun 2009 12:30:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.latimes.com/business/la-fi-ct-myspace17-2009jun17,0,6726077.story>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/06/18/news-corp-s-myspace-has-cooled-its-heels-begins-layoffs/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19069695/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/06/18/news-corp-s-myspace-has-cooled-its-heels-begins-layoffs/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Debra Aho Williamson</category><category>Facebook</category><category>layoffs</category><category>MySpace</category><category>News Corp.</category><category>NewsCorp.</category><category>Owen Van Natta</category><category>Rupert Murdoch</category><category>social networks</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Brian White]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 18 Jun 2009 12:30:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[More bank stress tests needed?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/06/09/more-stress-tests-needed/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/06/09/more-stress-tests-needed/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/06/09/more-stress-tests-needed/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/economic-data/" rel="tag">Economic Data</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/federal-reserve/" rel="tag">Federal Reserve</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/financial-crisis/" rel="tag">Financial Crisis</a></p><img hspace="4" align="right" vspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/11/dollarsign-at150-02blog.jpg" alt="" />The Congressional Oversight Panel announced in a report this morning that it feels <a href="http://money.aol.com/article/more-bank-stress-tests-may-be-needed/519576">more bank stress tests are needed</a>, especially if unemployment rates continue to rise. The group believes that the stress tests should be repeated periodically as long as banks continue to hold toxic assets. <br /><br />The panel used a risk-modeling approach that is described as "reasonable and conservative," but added that it is impossible for an outside party to mirror the loss projections that form the core of the stress tests. The group noted that the "more adverse scenario" assumption for the U.S. unemployment rate in the tests has nearly been met in 2009. The yearly average for the unemployment rate stands at 8.5%, which isn't far from the 8.9% assumed in the first round of stress tests. The group recommended that the "Treasury publicly track the status of its stress test macro-economic assumptions (unemployment, GDP, and housing prices) and repeat the stress test if the adverse scenario assumptions have been exceeded."<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/06/09/more-stress-tests-needed/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>More bank stress tests needed?</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/06/09/more-stress-tests-needed/">More bank stress tests needed?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 09 Jun 2009 10:10:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/06/09/more-stress-tests-needed/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19061840/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/06/09/more-stress-tests-needed/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>bank stress tests</category><category>BankStressTests</category><category>economic crisis</category><category>EconomicCrisis</category><category>GDP</category><category>housing prices</category><category>HousingPrices</category><category>inthenews</category><category>Rupert Murdoch</category><category>RupertMurdoch</category><category>TARP</category><category>tarp repayment</category><category>TarpRepayment</category><category>unemployment</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark Fightmaster]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2009 10:10:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[News Corp. appoints new chairman]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/06/04/news-corp-appoints-new-chairman/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/06/04/news-corp-appoints-new-chairman/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/06/04/news-corp-appoints-new-chairman/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/nws/" rel="tag">News Corp'B' (NWS)</a></p><img alt="" hspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/04/nws-news-corp-logo.jpg" align="right" vspace="4" border="1" />It looks like it is out with the old, in with the old at <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/news-corporation/nws/nas">News Corp.</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/news-corporation/nws/nas">NWS</a>), as former executive Chase Carey is <a href="http://www.marketwatch.com/story/top-exec-returns-to-news-corp-to-replace-coo">returning to the company</a> in the role of deputy chairman and chief operating officer. Carey has served as the CEO of <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/the-directv-group-inc-cmn-stk/dtv/nas">DirecTV Group</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/the-directv-group-inc-cmn-stk/dtv/nas">DTV</a>) for the past six years, but was the co-chief operating officer for NWS from 1996 through 2002. Carey will replace COO Peter Chernin, who announced in February that he would depart NWS when his contract runs out at the end of June. <br /><br />It is no secret that NWS has struggled since the economic crisis started, as weakness in the company's catalog of DVDs have driven the stock lower. Carey helped the company become a "truly viable fourth broadcast network" by helping Fox land NFL games, and helping launch Fox News Channel, FX, and the National Geographic Channel.<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/06/04/news-corp-appoints-new-chairman/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>News Corp. appoints new chairman</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/06/04/news-corp-appoints-new-chairman/">News Corp. appoints new chairman</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 04 Jun 2009 12:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/06/04/news-corp-appoints-new-chairman/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19057456/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/06/04/news-corp-appoints-new-chairman/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Chase Carey</category><category>ChaseCarey</category><category>inthenews</category><category>News Corp.</category><category>NewsCorp.</category><category>NWS</category><category>Rupert Murdoch</category><category>RupertMurdoch</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark Fightmaster]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 04 Jun 2009 12:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Rupert Murdoch to Google: Stop stealing!]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/04/07/rupert-murdoch-to-google-stop-stealing/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/04/07/rupert-murdoch-to-google-stop-stealing/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/04/07/rupert-murdoch-to-google-stop-stealing/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/products-and-services/" rel="tag">Products and Services</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/goog/" rel="tag">Google (GOOG)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/marketing-and-advertising/" rel="tag">Marketing and Advertising</a></p><p><img alt="" hspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2009/04/google-news-logo.png" align="right" vspace="4" border="0" /><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/google-inc-cl-a/goog/nas">Google, Inc.</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/google-inc-cl-a/goog/nas">GOOG</a>) has made enemy after enemy in recent years after continuing to aggregate news and information sources to ensure customers can find the information they want, any time and on any device. </p>
<p>When Google News was launched, it became a target for publishers who believed that Google was somehow pilfering content. These folks still do not get it, especially media baron Rupert Murdoch. It's odd, since Murdoch seemingly gets new media.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/04/07/rupert-murdoch-to-google-stop-stealing/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Rupert Murdoch to Google: Stop stealing!</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/04/07/rupert-murdoch-to-google-stop-stealing/">Rupert Murdoch to Google: Stop stealing!</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 07 Apr 2009 09:50:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.forbes.com/2009/04/03/rupert-murdoch-google-business-media-murdoch.html>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/04/07/rupert-murdoch-to-google-stop-stealing/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1508904/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/04/07/rupert-murdoch-to-google-stop-stealing/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>GOOG</category><category>Google</category><category>Google News</category><category>GoogleNews</category><category>inthenews</category><category>Rupert Murdoch</category><category>RupertMurdoch</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Brian White]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 07 Apr 2009 09:50:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[DailyFinance today: Phillies pitcher loses everything in Stanford scandal, Rupert Murdoch problems, 401(k) skimming, OPEC and the price slide]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/25/dailyfinance-today-phillies-pitcher-loses-everything-in-standor/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/25/dailyfinance-today-phillies-pitcher-loses-everything-in-standor/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/25/dailyfinance-today-phillies-pitcher-loses-everything-in-standor/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<table cellspacing="0" cellpadding="5" style="border-width: 0pt;">
    <tbody>
        <tr>
            <td valign="top" align="right"><a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/2009/02/25/philllies-pitcher-loses-everything-in-stanford-scandal/"><img hspace="4" vspace="4" border="1" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.dailyfinance.com/media/2009/02/baseball_pc_200_041305_thumbnail.jpg" /></a></td>
            <td><a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/2009/02/25/philllies-pitcher-loses-everything-in-stanford-scandal/">Phillies pitcher loses everything in Stanford scandal</a></td>
        </tr>
        <tr>
            <td valign="top" align="right"><a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/2009/02/25/problems-mount-for-rupert-murdoch/"><img hspace="4" vspace="4" border="1" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/12/rupert-murdoch_thumbnail.jpg" /></a></td>
            <td><a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/2009/02/25/problems-mount-for-rupert-murdoch/">Problems mount for Rupert Murdoch</a></td>
        </tr>
        <tr>
            <td valign="top" align="right"><a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/2009/02/25/the-401-k-skimming-scam/"><img hspace="4" vspace="4" border="1" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/06/dan_solin_5668-%28wince%29_thumbnail.jpg" /></a></td>
            <td><a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/2009/02/25/the-401-k-skimming-scam/">The 401(k) skimming scam</a> </td>
        </tr>
        <tr>
            <td valign="top" align="right"><a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/2009/02/25/can-opec-stop-the-oil-price-slide/"><img hspace="4" vspace="4" border="1" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.dailyfinance.com/media/2009/02/pumping-gas_thumbnail.jpg" /></a></td>
            <td><a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/2009/02/25/can-opec-stop-the-oil-price-slide/" rel="bookmark">Can OPEC stop the oil price slide?</a> </td>
        </tr>
        <tr>
            <td valign="top" align="right"><a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/2009/02/25/ubs-makes-a-31-billion-order-error/"><img hspace="4" vspace="4" border="1" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.dailyfinance.com/media/2009/02/tokyo_stock_exchange_thumbnail.jpg" /></a></td>
            <td> <a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/2009/02/25/ubs-makes-a-31-billion-order-error/" rel="bookmark">UBS makes a $31 billion order error</a> </td>
        </tr>
        <tr>
            <td valign="top" align="right"><a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/2009/02/25/picks-and-pans-procter-and-gamble-is-a-quintessential-defensive-p/"><img hspace="4" vspace="4" border="1" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/11/picks-and-pans_thumbnail.jpg" /></a></td>
            <td><a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/2009/02/25/picks-and-pans-procter-and-gamble-is-a-quintessential-defensive-p/" rel="bookmark">Picks and pans: Apple faces technical resistance, Immucor is a recession-resistant buy</a> </td>
        </tr>
    </tbody>
</table><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/25/dailyfinance-today-phillies-pitcher-loses-everything-in-standor/">DailyFinance today: Phillies pitcher loses everything in Stanford scandal, Rupert Murdoch problems, 401(k) skimming, OPEC and the price slide</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 25 Feb 2009 18:20:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/25/dailyfinance-today-phillies-pitcher-loses-everything-in-standor/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1471702/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/25/dailyfinance-today-phillies-pitcher-loses-everything-in-standor/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>401K skimming</category><category>401kSkimming</category><category>dailyfinance</category><category>OPEC</category><category>rupert murdoch</category><category>RupertMurdoch</category><category>UBS</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Melly Alazraki]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 25 Feb 2009 18:20:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Rupert Murdoch: Another old man loses key management  ]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/24/rupert-murdoch-another-old-man-loses-key-management-cbs-via/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/24/rupert-murdoch-another-old-man-loses-key-management-cbs-via/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/24/rupert-murdoch-another-old-man-loses-key-management-cbs-via/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/via/" rel="tag">Viacom (VIA)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/cbs/" rel="tag">CBS Corp 'B' (CBS)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/nws/" rel="tag">News Corp'B' (NWS)</a></p><p><img hspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/10/rupert-murdoch-nws.jpg" align="right" vspace="4" border="1" alt="" />Sumner Redstone, who is the de facto head of <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/viacom-inc-new/via/nys">Viacom</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/viacom-inc-new/via/nys">VIA</a>) and <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/cbs-corporation/cbs/nys">CBS</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/cbs-corporation/cbs/nys">CBS</a>), was supposed to be the media baron who could not keep his top management. Now Rupert Murdoch, CEO of <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/news-corporation/nws/nas">News Corp</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/news-corporation/nws/nas">NWS</a>), has joined the club. The president of his company, Peter Chernin, <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB123542374683052407.html?mod=testMod">is leaving</a>.</p>
<p>Murdoch may be gambling that he can keep his job for life and hand it to one of his children. Since he is 77 and none of his children may be qualified, that could be a bad gamble. At least Chernin could have kept the CEO's seat warm while one of Murdoch's offspring got some more on-the-job training.</p>
<p>The press has made the Chernin departure into a story about the earnings trouble at News Corp. In reality, its problems are not much worse than they are at most other big media companies. News Corp is burdened more than some of its peers because of its newspaper holdings. But, odds are that News Corp will make it out of the recession intact and in a position to take advantage of the eventual improvement in the ad markets.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/24/rupert-murdoch-another-old-man-loses-key-management-cbs-via/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Rupert Murdoch: Another old man loses key management  </em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/24/rupert-murdoch-another-old-man-loses-key-management-cbs-via/">Rupert Murdoch: Another old man loses key management  </a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 24 Feb 2009 08:45:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/24/rupert-murdoch-another-old-man-loses-key-management-cbs-via/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1469718/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/24/rupert-murdoch-another-old-man-loses-key-management-cbs-via/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>CBS</category><category>inthenews</category><category>NWS</category><category>Rupert Murdoch</category><category>RupertMurdoch</category><category>Sumner Redstone</category><category>SumnerRedstone</category><category>VIA</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Douglas McIntyre]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 24 Feb 2009 08:45:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Note to Rupert Murdoch: Dow Jones would have been cheaper this year]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/14/note-to-rupert-murdoch-dow-jones-would-have-been-cheaper-this-y/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/14/note-to-rupert-murdoch-dow-jones-would-have-been-cheaper-this-y/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/14/note-to-rupert-murdoch-dow-jones-would-have-been-cheaper-this-y/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/nyt/" rel="tag">New York Times'A' (NYT)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/nws/" rel="tag">News Corp'B' (NWS)</a></p><p><img height="160" hspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/10/rupert-murdoch-nws.jpg" width="220" align="right" vspace="4" border="1" alt="" />Rupert Murdoch, the CEO of <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/news-corporation/nws/nas">News Corp.</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/news-corporation/nws/nas">NWS</a>) paid what most people thought was the limit of the rational price when he bought Dow Jones over a year ago for $5 billion. His company has already been forced to write-down a part of that in its earnings report for 2008. But, Dow Jones might be only worth $500 million or $1 billion if it were still public today.</p>
<p>A quick look at the Saturday <em>Wall Street Journal </em>shows a paper in four sections, each very thin. When all the ads for Dow Jones products are subtracted, there are about three paid pages of advertising left. That has to create a really large loss.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/14/note-to-rupert-murdoch-dow-jones-would-have-been-cheaper-this-y/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Note to Rupert Murdoch: Dow Jones would have been cheaper this year</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/14/note-to-rupert-murdoch-dow-jones-would-have-been-cheaper-this-y/">Note to Rupert Murdoch: Dow Jones would have been cheaper this year</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Sat, 14 Feb 2009 13:40:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/14/note-to-rupert-murdoch-dow-jones-would-have-been-cheaper-this-y/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1460363/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/14/note-to-rupert-murdoch-dow-jones-would-have-been-cheaper-this-y/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>New York Times</category><category>News Corp</category><category>NWS</category><category>NYT</category><category>Rupert Murdoch</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Douglas McIntyre]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 14 Feb 2009 13:40:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Is it time for a management change at News Corp?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/06/is-it-time-for-a-management-change-at-news-corp/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/06/is-it-time-for-a-management-change-at-news-corp/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/06/is-it-time-for-a-management-change-at-news-corp/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/earnings-reports/" rel="tag">Earnings Reports</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/marketing-and-advertising/" rel="tag">Marketing and Advertising</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/nws/" rel="tag">News Corp'B' (NWS)</a></p><p><strong><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/news-corporation-limited-the/nws/nas"><img alt="" hspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2009/02/nws.jpg" align="right" vspace="4" border="1" />News Corp.</a></strong> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/news-corporation-limited-the/nws/nas">NWS</a>) CEO Rupert Murdoch, at 77, has been around for a while. But it looks like that while may be too long after today's report on News Corp. earnings and outlook. That report suggests that Murdoch wildly overpaid for Dow Jones. But he wanted it and he got what he wanted. The questions for long-suffering shareholders is whether what <em>Murdoch</em> wants is good for <em>them</em> and whether he's the person to lead News Corp through the troubled waters ahead.</p>
<p>Prospects are for more pain. Analysts are estimating a <a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601103&amp;sid=asBjNm97.I24&amp;refer=us">22%</a> drop in News Corp.'s fiscal 2009 operating profit to almost $4 billion. And with its stock down 56% in the last year, what could Murdoch do to revive it? One possibility is to restructure the newspapers in a radical -- but obvious way -- put all the content online and sell search advertising to those who want access to all the readers. That would cut the cost of the newspapers tremendously.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/06/is-it-time-for-a-management-change-at-news-corp/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Is it time for a management change at News Corp?</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/06/is-it-time-for-a-management-change-at-news-corp/">Is it time for a management change at News Corp?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 06 Feb 2009 13:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601103&amp;sid=asBjNm9>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/06/is-it-time-for-a-management-change-at-news-corp/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1452347/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/06/is-it-time-for-a-management-change-at-news-corp/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Bskyb</category><category>entertainment</category><category>inthenews</category><category>media</category><category>NWs</category><category>NY Post</category><category>NyPost</category><category>Rupert Murdoch</category><category>RupertMurdoch</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Peter Cohan]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 06 Feb 2009 13:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[News Corp.'s Q2 earnings get low ratings ]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/06/news-corp-s-q2-earnings-get-low-ratings/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/06/news-corp-s-q2-earnings-get-low-ratings/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/06/news-corp-s-q2-earnings-get-low-ratings/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/earnings-reports/" rel="tag">Earnings Reports</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/ge/" rel="tag">General Electric (GE)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/twx/" rel="tag">Time Warner (TWX)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/dis/" rel="tag">Walt Disney (DIS)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/via/" rel="tag">Viacom (VIA)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/cbs/" rel="tag">CBS Corp 'B' (CBS)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/nws/" rel="tag">News Corp'B' (NWS)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/media-world/" rel="tag">Media World</a></p><p><img hspace="4" align="right" vspace="4" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/12/rupert-murdoch.jpg" /><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/news-corporation/nws/nys">News Corp.</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/news-corporation/nws/nys">NWS</a>), the big media conglomerate that competes with <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/the-walt-disney-company/dis/nys">Disney</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/the-walt-disney-company/dis/nys">DIS</a>), <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/time-warner-inc/twx/nys">Time Warner</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/time-warner-inc/twx/nys">TWX</a>), <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/cbs-corporation/cbs/nys">CBS</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/cbs-corporation/cbs/nys">CBS</a>), <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/viacom-inc-new/via/nys">Viacom</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/viacom-inc-new/via/nys">VIA</a>) and <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/general-electric-company/ge/nys">General Electric</a>'s (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/general-electric-company/ge/nys">GE</a>) NBC Universal, reported not-so-good earnings for the <a href="http://money.aol.com/news/articles/qp/pr/_a/news-corporation-reports-second-quarter/rfid182514564">fiscal second quarter</a> on Thursday after the bell. <br /></p>
<p>Of course, not many companies are reporting good earnings these days, are they? News Corp. lost $2.45 per share due to impairment charges for goodwill and intangible assets. Throwing that aside, the company earned 12 cents per share. Unfortunately, as you can imagine, that <a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601103&amp;sid=asBjNm97.I24&amp;refer=us">came up well short of estimates</a> of 19 cents per share. Net sales dropped 8%.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/06/news-corp-s-q2-earnings-get-low-ratings/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>News Corp.'s Q2 earnings get low ratings </em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/06/news-corp-s-q2-earnings-get-low-ratings/">News Corp.'s Q2 earnings get low ratings </a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 06 Feb 2009 08:30:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601103&amp;sid=asBjNm97.I24&amp;refer=us>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/06/news-corp-s-q2-earnings-get-low-ratings/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1451921/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/06/news-corp-s-q2-earnings-get-low-ratings/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>bill oreilly</category><category>BillOreilly</category><category>CBS</category><category>DIS</category><category>disney</category><category>featured</category><category>fox news channel</category><category>FoxNewsChannel</category><category>GE</category><category>general electric</category><category>GeneralElectric</category><category>media</category><category>nbc universal</category><category>NbcUniversal</category><category>news corp.</category><category>NewsCorp.</category><category>NWS</category><category>rupert murdoch</category><category>RupertMurdoch</category><category>sean hannity</category><category>SeanHannity</category><category>time warner</category><category>TimeWarner</category><category>TWX</category><category>via</category><category>viacom</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Steven Mallas]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 06 Feb 2009 08:30:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Money losers of 2008: Billionaires who lost billions this year]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/12/24/money-losers-of-2008-billionaires-who-lost-billions-this-year/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/12/24/money-losers-of-2008-billionaires-who-lost-billions-this-year/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/12/24/money-losers-of-2008-billionaires-who-lost-billions-this-year/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/goog/" rel="tag">Google (GOOG)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/msft/" rel="tag">Microsoft (MSFT)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/aapl/" rel="tag">Apple Inc (AAPL)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/dell/" rel="tag">Dell (DELL)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/ebay/" rel="tag">eBay (EBAY)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/amzn/" rel="tag">Amazon.com (AMZN)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/brk-a/" rel="tag">Berkshire Hathaway (BRK.A)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/shld/" rel="tag">Sears Holdings (SHLD)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/aig/" rel="tag">Amer Intl Group (AIG)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/orcl/" rel="tag">Oracle Corp (ORCL)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/nws/" rel="tag">News Corp'B' (NWS)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/bx/" rel="tag">Blackstone Group L.P (BX)</a></p><p><em><img alt="" hspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/12/money-losers-6-billionaires-200cm121808.jpg" align="right" vspace="4" border="1" />This post is part of our feature on <strong><a href="http://www.walletpop.com/specials/money-losers">Money Losers of 2008</a></strong>. See all 20.</em></p>
<p>There's no doubt about it -- times are tough. People are struggling to find work and to pay the bills as the value of their homes and savings dwindle. The poor get poorer, and the rich get richer. </p>
<p>Or do they? It's all relative, of course, but world's billionaires have been taking some big hits too. We take a look at <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/12/23/money-losers-of-2008-most-of-sheldon-adelsons-fortune-erased-b/">Sheldon Adelson</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/12/24/money-losers-of-2008-kirk-kerkorian-takes-hits-from-mgm-and-for/">Kirk Kerkorian</a>, and <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/12/24/money-losers-of-2008-falling-demand-for-steel-melts-lakshmi-mi/">Lakshmi Mittal</a> in their own separate posts, but here are some other billionaires who have lost billions this year (courtesy of <em><a href="http://www.forbes.com/2008/12/16/billionaires-adelson-casino-biz-billies-cz_dg_1216biggestlosers.html">Forbes</a></em> and <a href="http://businesssheet.alleyinsider.com/loser"><em>Business Sheet</em></a>).</p>
<ul>
    <li>Brothers <strong>Anil</strong> and <strong>Mukesh Ambani</strong> of India's private conglomerate Reliance lost $32.5 billion and $28.2 billion, respectively. </li>
    <li><strong>Warren Buffett</strong>, the Sage of Omaha, lost $16.5 billion. Shares of <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/berkshire-hathaway-inc-cl-a/brk.a/nys">Berkshire Hathaway Inc.</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/berkshire-hathaway-inc-cl-a/brk.a/nys">BRK.A</a>) are down about 32% since the beginning of the year. </li>
    <li><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/microsoft-corporation/msft/nas">Microsoft </a>(NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/microsoft-corporation/msft/nas">MSFT</a>) founders <strong>Bill Gates</strong> and <strong>Paul Allen</strong> lost $12.3 billion and $2.6 billion, respectively, while CEO <strong>Steve Balmer</strong> lost $6.5 billion. Shares of Microsoft are down 46% since the beginning of the year. </li>
    <li><strong>Larry Page</strong> and <strong>Sergey Brin</strong>, cofounders of <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/google-inc/goog/nas">Google Inc.</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/google-inc/goog/nas">GOOG</a>), lost $11.9 billion and $11.7 billion, respectively, and CEO <strong>Eric Schmidt</strong> lost $3.8 billion. The share price of Google has fallen 55% since the beginning of the year. </li>
    <li><strong>Larry Ellison</strong>, CEO of <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/oracle-corporation/orcl/nas">Oracle Corp.</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/oracle-corporation/orcl/nas">ORCL</a>), lost $8.2 billion. Shares of Oracle are down 21% since the beginning of the year. </li>
    <li>Media maven <strong>Sumner Redstone</strong> lost $7.2 billion. Shares of his private investment firm National Amusements fell 70% this year. </li>
</ul><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/12/24/money-losers-of-2008-billionaires-who-lost-billions-this-year/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Money losers of 2008: Billionaires who lost billions this year</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/12/24/money-losers-of-2008-billionaires-who-lost-billions-this-year/">Money losers of 2008: Billionaires who lost billions this year</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 24 Dec 2008 12:30:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/12/24/money-losers-of-2008-billionaires-who-lost-billions-this-year/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1403111/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/12/24/money-losers-of-2008-billionaires-who-lost-billions-this-year/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>AAPL</category><category>AIG</category><category>Amazon</category><category>Amazon.com</category><category>AMZN</category><category>Anil Ambani</category><category>Apple</category><category>BAC</category><category>Bank of America</category><category>Berkshire Hathaway</category><category>bilionaires</category><category>Bill Gates</category><category>Blackstone Group</category><category>BRK.A</category><category>BX</category><category>Carl Icahn</category><category>Carnival</category><category>CCL</category><category>Charles Ergen</category><category>Citigroup</category><category>Clemmie Dixon Spangler</category><category>Dan Duncan</category><category>DELL</category><category>DISH</category><category>Dish Network</category><category>eBay</category><category>Eddie Lampert</category><category>EPD</category><category>Eric Schmidt</category><category>Ernest Randy</category><category>Ernest Stempel</category><category>featured</category><category>Garmin</category><category>Gary Burrell</category><category>GOOG</category><category>Google</category><category>GRMN</category><category>Hank Greenberg</category><category>Jeff Bezos</category><category>Jerry Yang</category><category>Larry Ellison</category><category>Larry Page</category><category>Leslie Gonda</category><category>Michael Dell</category><category>Micky Arison</category><category>Microsoft</category><category>Min Kao</category><category>Money Losers 2008</category><category>MSFT</category><category>Mukeshi Ambani</category><category>News Corp.</category><category>NWS</category><category>Oleg Deripaska</category><category>Oracle</category><category>ORCL</category><category>Paul Allen</category><category>Pierre Omidyar</category><category>Rupert Murdoch</category><category>Sanford Weill</category><category>Sears</category><category>Sergey Brin</category><category>SHLD</category><category>Stephen Schwarzman</category><category>Steve Balmer</category><category>Steve Jobs</category><category>Steve Wynn</category><category>Sumner Redstone</category><category>Wachovia</category><category>Warren Buffett</category><category>WB</category><category>WYNN</category><category>Wynn Resorts</category><category>Yahoo</category><category>YHOO</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Trey Thoelcke]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 24 Dec 2008 12:30:00 EST</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
