<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd">
<channel>
<title>BloggingStocks</title>
<link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com</link>
<description>BloggingStocks</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Dow Jones and News Corp: Very 'Guys &amp; Dolls,' very wrong]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/05/01/dow-jones-and-news-corp-very-guys-and-dolls-very-wrong/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/05/01/dow-jones-and-news-corp-very-guys-and-dolls-very-wrong/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/05/01/dow-jones-and-news-corp-very-guys-and-dolls-very-wrong/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/deals/" rel="tag">Deals</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/rants-and-raves/" rel="tag">Rants and Raves</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/nws/" rel="tag">News Corp'B' (NWS)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/dj/" rel="tag">Dow Jones and Co (DJ)</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/05/wsj_frontpage_spcummings.jpg" />It was the news as soon as I logged into my computer this morning from my West Coast office: Rupert Murdoch's <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/news-corporation/nws/nys?tabs=quotesandnews">News Corp.</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/news-corporation/nws/nys?tabs=quotesandnews">NWS</a>) had made a whopping $5 billion bid for <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/dow-jones-and-company-inc/dj/nys">Dow Jones &amp; Co.</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/dow-jones-and-company-inc/dj/nys">DJ</a>). The bid was unsolicited and, it seems, entirely <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/05/01/dow-jones-you-didn-t-have-me-at-5-billion/">hostile to the Bancroft family</a>, who controls Dow Jones and <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/05/01/dow-jones-bancrofts-rejects-murdochs-offer/">seems to be rejecting the generous offer</a>.<br /><br />It's a cute story, very <em>Guys &amp; Dolls</em>. On one hand we have Dow Jones with its flagship brand, the <em>Wall Street Journal</em>. The paper is everything about wealth -- its very emblem the center of all the world's markets, Wall Street -- the editors are known for their conservative bent, the writers are known for their unparalleled and brainy research, even the design is known for its long-time avoidance of peripherals like color printing and photographs. On the other hand, we have Rupert Murdoch and his gang of vagabonds, from FOX broadcasting (need I really say more than "Next on FOX... <em>Are You Smarter Than a Fifth Grader?</em>") to the vast spoiled brat of recent acquisition MySpace. They're very other-side-of-the-tracks, the kind of news organization that would get a tattoo on its buttocks and then try to slip it in as the senior picture in the high school yearbook. <br /><br />They're not a match made in heaven. They're a match made for <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Joe_Millionaire"><em>Joe Millionaire</em></a>, or Broadway. It's not real life; it wouldn't work. Whether or not the money is right, the styles are so vastly different, the respective organizations' reputations so opposite, any so-called "synergy" would be lost before the first page of the merger agreement was drafted.<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/05/01/dow-jones-and-news-corp-very-guys-and-dolls-very-wrong/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Dow Jones and News Corp: Very 'Guys &amp; Dolls,' very wrong</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/05/01/dow-jones-and-news-corp-very-guys-and-dolls-very-wrong/">Dow Jones and News Corp: Very 'Guys &amp; Dolls,' very wrong</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 01 May 2007 20:28:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/05/01/dow-jones-and-news-corp-very-guys-and-dolls-very-wrong/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/886713/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/05/01/dow-jones-and-news-corp-very-guys-and-dolls-very-wrong/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>bancroft</category><category>bancroft family</category><category>BancroftFamily</category><category>bid</category><category>dj</category><category>dow jones</category><category>DowJones</category><category>fox</category><category>hostile</category><category>hostile bid</category><category>hostile takeover</category><category>HostileBid</category><category>HostileTakeover</category><category>media</category><category>merger</category><category>murdoch</category><category>news</category><category>news corp</category><category>NewsCorp</category><category>newspaper</category><category>nws</category><category>paper</category><category>rupert</category><category>rupert murdoch</category><category>RupertMurdoch</category><category>takeover</category><category>wall street journal</category><category>WallStreetJournal</category><category>wsj</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Sarah Gilbert]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 01 May 2007 20:28:00 EST</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
