<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd">
<channel>
<title>BloggingStocks</title>
<link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com</link>
<description>BloggingStocks</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Consumer Spending Stalls Out in April]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/05/30/consumer-spending-stalls-out-in-april/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/05/30/consumer-spending-stalls-out-in-april/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/05/30/consumer-spending-stalls-out-in-april/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/forecasts/" rel="tag">Forecasts</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/economic-data/" rel="tag">Economic Data</a></p><img hspace="4" align="right" vspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2010/02/target-shoppers-240x160.jpg" alt="" />In order for the current U.S. economic recovery to continue, people are going to need to spend. But in April, consumer spending had its <a href="http://www.google.com/hostednews/ap/article/ALeqM5gNiyJ905Ho0Ur96V2TQhsBX19lGwD9G01JO00">weakest showing in the past seven months</a>.<br />
<br />
Consumption was flat for the month, despite rising incomes, as consumers opted to stash away their money in savings instead of running out and spending it. The savings rate jumped to 3.6% for the month, up from 3.1% during March.<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/05/30/consumer-spending-stalls-out-in-april/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Consumer Spending Stalls Out in April</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/05/30/consumer-spending-stalls-out-in-april/">Consumer Spending Stalls Out in April</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Sun, 30 May 2010 09:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/05/30/consumer-spending-stalls-out-in-april/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19496184/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/05/30/consumer-spending-stalls-out-in-april/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>consumer spending</category><category>consumers</category><category>economic recovery</category><category>income</category><category>inthenews</category><category>personal income</category><category>recession</category><category>savings</category><category>shopping</category><category>spending</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Michael Fowlkes]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 30 May 2010 09:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Consumer Spending Logs Largest Increase in Months as Savings Dwindle]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/05/03/march-consumer-spending/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/05/03/march-consumer-spending/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/05/03/march-consumer-spending/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/economic-data/" rel="tag">Economic Data</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/recession/" rel="tag">Recession</a></p><p><img hspace="4" border="1" align="right" vspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2010/03/commercedept.jpg"  alt="" />According to the Commerce Department, consumer spending <a target="_blank" href="http://www.aolnews.com/story/consumer-spending-advances-sharply-but/719129">increased in March</a> by the largest amount in five months.</p>
<p>Consumer spending increased 0.6% in March, which matched expectations. While this is the good news, the bad news is that the gains appear to have been driven by a depletion of savings, which dropped to the lowest level in 18 months. The personal savings rate fell to 2.7% of post-tax incomes, the lowest level since September 2008. Personal incomes increased a mere 0.3%, which presents concern about minuscule income growth.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/05/03/march-consumer-spending/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Consumer Spending Logs Largest Increase in Months as Savings Dwindle</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/05/03/march-consumer-spending/">Consumer Spending Logs Largest Increase in Months as Savings Dwindle</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 03 May 2010 11:20:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/05/03/march-consumer-spending/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19462260/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/05/03/march-consumer-spending/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>consumer</category><category>consumer spending</category><category>economic data</category><category>savings</category><category>savings accounts</category><category>spending</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark Fightmaster]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 03 May 2010 11:20:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Wells Fargo to eliminate overdraft charges]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/24/wells-fargo-to-eliminate-overdraft-charges/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/24/wells-fargo-to-eliminate-overdraft-charges/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/24/wells-fargo-to-eliminate-overdraft-charges/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/competitive-strategy/" rel="tag">Competitive Strategy</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/wfc/" rel="tag">Wells Fargo (WFC)</a></p><p><img border="1" hspace="4" vspace="4" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/09/wells-fargo-wfc-logo.gif" alt="" /><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/wells-fargo-and-company/wfc/nys">Wells Fargo</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/wells-fargo-and-company/wfc/nys">WFC</a>) announced on Thursday that it will <a href="http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2009/09/23/BU8619R2BF.DTL&amp;feed=rss.business">eliminate fees on customer overdrafts</a> of $5 or less and is going to limit overdraft charges to a maximum for four per day.</p>
<p>This move follows similar moves from other large banks, prompting some to ask what took so long. In addition, Wells Fargo customers will be allowed to opt out of automatic overdraft coverage. Doing so would mean that debit card and ATM transactions would not be allowed to go through if your account is overdrawn.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/24/wells-fargo-to-eliminate-overdraft-charges/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Wells Fargo to eliminate overdraft charges</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/24/wells-fargo-to-eliminate-overdraft-charges/">Wells Fargo to eliminate overdraft charges</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 24 Sep 2009 12:30:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/24/wells-fargo-to-eliminate-overdraft-charges/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19172559/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/24/wells-fargo-to-eliminate-overdraft-charges/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>bank accounts</category><category>banks</category><category>checking</category><category>financial crisis</category><category>inthenews</category><category>overdraft charges</category><category>overdraft fees</category><category>savings</category><category>Wells Fargo</category><category>WFC</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark Fightmaster]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 24 Sep 2009 12:30:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Under the radar: U.S. savings rate rises to 5.7%, a 14-year high]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/06/03/under-the-radar-u-s-savings-rate-rises-to-5-7-a-14-year-high/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/06/03/under-the-radar-u-s-savings-rate-rises-to-5-7-a-14-year-high/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/06/03/under-the-radar-u-s-savings-rate-rises-to-5-7-a-14-year-high/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/forecasts/" rel="tag">Forecasts</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/consumer-experience/" rel="tag">Consumer Experience</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/economic-data/" rel="tag">Economic Data</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/recession/" rel="tag">Recession</a></p><img hspace="4" border="1" align="right" vspace="4" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/12/dollar-bill.jpg" /><strong>Under the radar: </strong>Some trends are obvious enough and visible to all investors. Others are more subtle, but are just as potent, and these often slip "under the radar."<br /><br /><strong>Case in point:</strong> Almost every investor and citizen knows that Americans are saving more. But do you know the economic implications of that higher savings rate?<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/06/03/under-the-radar-u-s-savings-rate-rises-to-5-7-a-14-year-high/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Under the radar: U.S. savings rate rises to 5.7%, a 14-year high</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/06/03/under-the-radar-u-s-savings-rate-rises-to-5-7-a-14-year-high/">Under the radar: U.S. savings rate rises to 5.7%, a 14-year high</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 03 Jun 2009 18:30:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/06/03/under-the-radar-u-s-savings-rate-rises-to-5-7-a-14-year-high/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19056880/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/06/03/under-the-radar-u-s-savings-rate-rises-to-5-7-a-14-year-high/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>featured</category><category>savings</category><category>savings rate</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Joseph Lazzaro]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 03 Jun 2009 18:30:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Ignore Washington -- keep saving; General Patton makes a point]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/26/ignore-washington-keep-saving-general-patton-makes-a-point/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/26/ignore-washington-keep-saving-general-patton-makes-a-point/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/26/ignore-washington-keep-saving-general-patton-makes-a-point/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/rants-and-raves/" rel="tag">Rants and Raves</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/personalfinance/" rel="tag">Personal Finance</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/politics/" rel="tag">Politics</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/recession/" rel="tag">Recession</a></p><p><img hspace="4" height="358" border="1" align="right" width="310" vspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2009/02/scott-as-patton.jpg" alt="" style="width: 300px; height: 332px;" />General George S. Patton was attributed with saying: <em><strong><font class="sqq">"No poor bastard ever won a war by dying for his country. He won it by making other bastards die for their country."</font></strong></em> This was played out to perfection by George C. Scott in the Oscar winning 1970 movie 'Patton'.<br /><br />I feel the same way when I hear and read about how we need to spend more to revive the economy. You should let the other poor bastard spend for his country -- <strong><em>you should be saving!</em></strong></p>
<p>Reuters <a href="http://uk.reuters.com/article/companyNews/idUKTRE5112WC20090202">reported earlier in the month</a> that consumer spending continues to fall and savings are increasing. That's a good thing. The public gets it, the government does not.</p>
<p><font face="Comic Sans MS" color="#ffffff">e won it by making the other poor dumb bastard die for his country."<br /><strong>- Attributed to General George Patton Jr </strong></font></p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/26/ignore-washington-keep-saving-general-patton-makes-a-point/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Ignore Washington -- keep saving; General Patton makes a point</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/26/ignore-washington-keep-saving-general-patton-makes-a-point/">Ignore Washington -- keep saving; General Patton makes a point</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 26 Feb 2009 14:15:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/26/ignore-washington-keep-saving-general-patton-makes-a-point/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1448271/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/26/ignore-washington-keep-saving-general-patton-makes-a-point/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>consumer spending</category><category>ConsumerSpending</category><category>featured</category><category>G S Patton</category><category>government spending</category><category>GovernmentSpending</category><category>GSPatton</category><category>Recession</category><category>Savings</category><category>Sheldon Liber</category><category>SheldonLiber</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Sheldon Liber]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 26 Feb 2009 14:15:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[A bright side of the recession: Piggy bank sales are rising]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/02/a-bright-side-of-the-recession-piggy-bank-sales-are-rising/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/02/a-bright-side-of-the-recession-piggy-bank-sales-are-rising/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/02/a-bright-side-of-the-recession-piggy-bank-sales-are-rising/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/personalfinance/" rel="tag">Personal Finance</a></p><img hspace="4" vspace="4" border="1" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2009/01/dollarsign-at150-02blog.jpg" />Frustrated with poor returns from the stock market, investors are increasingly turning to a conventional strategy that can promise security at 0 percent interest rates. I am talking about piggy banks.<br /><br /><a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/newsOne/idUSTRE4BU44Q20081231">According to Reuters,</a> sales of the novelty banks are rising as the economy continues to worsen. Exact figures are hard to come by but several retailers report rising demand. <a href="http://www.piggybankworld.com/">Piggy Bank World.com</a> reported a strong holiday season, according to Michael Gehi, one of the owners. Companies are also increasingly using the banks for promotions.<br /><br />Though my wife and I don't own a piggy bank, we have taken our loose change to Commerce Bank (now owned by<a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/the-toronto-dominion-bank/td/nys"> TD Bank</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/the-toronto-dominion-bank/td/nys">TD</a>), which for years has counted people's spare change for free in a nifty computerized machine.<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/02/a-bright-side-of-the-recession-piggy-bank-sales-are-rising/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>A bright side of the recession: Piggy bank sales are rising</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/02/a-bright-side-of-the-recession-piggy-bank-sales-are-rising/">A bright side of the recession: Piggy bank sales are rising</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 02 Jan 2009 13:19:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.reuters.com/article/newsOne/idUSTRE4BU44Q20081231>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/02/a-bright-side-of-the-recession-piggy-bank-sales-are-rising/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1417007/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/02/a-bright-side-of-the-recession-piggy-bank-sales-are-rising/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>economy</category><category>featured</category><category>piggy banks</category><category>PiggyBanks</category><category>savings</category><category>savings rate</category><category>SavingsRate</category><category>US economy</category><category>UsEconomy</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jonathan Berr]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 02 Jan 2009 13:19:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Can your bank account keep up with inflation?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/10/29/can-your-bank-account-keep-up-with-inflation/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/10/29/can-your-bank-account-keep-up-with-inflation/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/10/29/can-your-bank-account-keep-up-with-inflation/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/consumer-experience/" rel="tag">Consumer Experience</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/financial-crisis/" rel="tag">Financial Crisis</a></p><p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/10/piggy-bank-header-at244-by-g.e.sattler.jpg" />In case you had not noticed, the brokerage industry, whose survival depends on keeping you in stocks and mutual funds, has a well-rehearsed series of talking points designed to keep them in business by siphoning fees and commissions from you.</p>
<p>Now that stocks have lost 40% of their value in the last year, they are trying to convince you not to panic. That translates into 'don't sell' -- and 'stocks are a bargain now so buy, buy, buy'. I've suggested that people who need their money in the next six years should use yesterday's 11% rise to cut their losses in stocks and put their money somewhere safer like an FDIC insured bank account or a money market fund.</p>
<p>But the financial services industry doesn't want you to do that since the profits from such a move would be small. So they will try to convince you that putting money into a bank account puts you at an enormous risk of falling behind inflation. But let's take a look at reality. Earlier this year, I was paying $4.20 a gallon for gasoline and today I can pay $2.63 -- that's not inflation, it's deflation.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/10/29/can-your-bank-account-keep-up-with-inflation/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Can your bank account keep up with inflation?</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/10/29/can-your-bank-account-keep-up-with-inflation/">Can your bank account keep up with inflation?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 29 Oct 2008 12:25:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/10/29/can-your-bank-account-keep-up-with-inflation/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1356222/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/10/29/can-your-bank-account-keep-up-with-inflation/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>banks</category><category>featured</category><category>inflation</category><category>savings</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Peter Cohan]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 29 Oct 2008 12:25:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[The Bush Administration's tax cut didn't increase investment and savings]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/09/08/the-bush-administrations-tax-cut-didnt-increase-investment-and/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/09/08/the-bush-administrations-tax-cut-didnt-increase-investment-and/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/09/08/the-bush-administrations-tax-cut-didnt-increase-investment-and/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/forecasts/" rel="tag">Forecasts</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/economic-data/" rel="tag">Economic Data</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/politics/" rel="tag">Politics</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/recession/" rel="tag">Recession</a></p><a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601039&amp;sid=a33YVKQ7OoaU&amp;refer=columnist_baum">Bloomberg columnist Caroline Baum</a> gently reminds us that not every tax cut achieves its intended effect. <br /><br />Case study: The 2001 Bush Administration federal income tax cut, which included a cut in the marginal tax rate to 35% from 39.6%. The Bush Administration touted it as a tax cut that would increase incentives to invest, save and work. <br /><br />The result? The tax cut didn't work: saving and investment have been "anemic" during the Bush years, <a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601039&amp;sid=a33YVKQ7OoaU&amp;refer=columnist_baum">Baum said</a>, citing data provided by Paul Kasriel, chief economist at Northern Trust Corp. in Chicago. Business investment is down, the savings rate is at a post-World War II low. Further, the labor participation rate has declined. <br /><br /><strong>No guarantee tax cut would be invested in U.S.</strong><br /><br />But why didn't cutting the top marginal rate do all of the good things the Bush Administration touted? Economist Peter Dawson said the reason is the tax cut's inherent flaw. <br /><br />"The tax cut contained the mistaken belief that rich taxpayers would invest their money and invest in the right way, in the U.S., to increase GDP," Dawson said. "There was no guarantee that they would do that. Someone who is rich could invest the money in Brazil or India, with little benefit for the United States."<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/09/08/the-bush-administrations-tax-cut-didnt-increase-investment-and/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>The Bush Administration's tax cut didn't increase investment and savings</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/09/08/the-bush-administrations-tax-cut-didnt-increase-investment-and/">The Bush Administration's tax cut didn't increase investment and savings</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 08 Sep 2008 11:40:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/09/08/the-bush-administrations-tax-cut-didnt-increase-investment-and/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1307432/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/09/08/the-bush-administrations-tax-cut-didnt-increase-investment-and/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>basic research</category><category>British pound</category><category>budget deficit</category><category>Bush Administration</category><category>Caroline Baum</category><category>dollar</category><category>education</category><category>euro</category><category>gdp</category><category>income taxes</category><category>infrastructure</category><category>inthenews</category><category>investment</category><category>job creation</category><category>jobs</category><category>marginal tax rates</category><category>national debt</category><category>President Bush</category><category>savings</category><category>tax cut</category><category>taxes</category><category>U.S. economy</category><category>workforce participation rate</category><category>yen</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Joseph Lazzaro]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 08 Sep 2008 11:40:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[The world's millionaire list hits a milestone]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/25/the-worlds-millionaire-list-hits-a-milestone/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/25/the-worlds-millionaire-list-hits-a-milestone/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/25/the-worlds-millionaire-list-hits-a-milestone/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/good-news/" rel="tag">Good news</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/consumer-experience/" rel="tag">Consumer Experience</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/india/" rel="tag">India</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/china/" rel="tag">China</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/brazil/" rel="tag">Brazil</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/marketmatters/" rel="tag">Market Matters</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/rich-in-america/" rel="tag">Rich in America</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/economic-data/" rel="tag">Economic Data</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/08/moneyroll.jpg" />For the first time ever, the number of millionaires in the world <a target="_blank" href="http://money.aol.com/news/articles/_a/worlds-millionaires-grow-to-10-million/20080624161109990001">broke through the 10 million mark</a> last year. All said and done, the total number of people who can claim to have $1 million in the bank grew to around 10.1 million people, and on average, these lucky few boast around $4 million in net worth.<br /><br />While the number of people in the "millionaires club" is definitely impressive, they still do not have to worry about the clout of their $1 million claims being diluted just yet. Ten million people may sound like a lot, but when you consider the world's total population is currently running at around 6.7 billion, you find that the percentage of all people on the planet who can claim to have $1 million is less than 0.2%. So don't feel too bad if you are not part of the club just yet.<br /><br />As in the past, the majority of millionaires have an American address, with one out of every three millionaires being American. But there are a few other areas of the world where growth is out-pacing the United States. Developing economies in India, China and Brazil resulted in huge growth in those countries, especially in India, where the number of millionaires rose by about 23% last year alone.<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/25/the-worlds-millionaire-list-hits-a-milestone/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>The world's millionaire list hits a milestone</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/25/the-worlds-millionaire-list-hits-a-milestone/">The world's millionaire list hits a milestone</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 25 Jun 2008 16:15:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/25/the-worlds-millionaire-list-hits-a-milestone/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1236576/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/25/the-worlds-millionaire-list-hits-a-milestone/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>fixed income</category><category>FixedIncome</category><category>millionaires</category><category>money</category><category>rich</category><category>savings</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Michael Fowlkes]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 25 Jun 2008 16:15:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Naked Truth Investing: Has Morgan Stanley seen the light?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/09/naked-truth-investing-has-morgan-stanley-seen-the-light/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/09/naked-truth-investing-has-morgan-stanley-seen-the-light/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/09/naked-truth-investing-has-morgan-stanley-seen-the-light/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/marketmatters/" rel="tag">Market Matters</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/funds/" rel="tag">Mutual Funds</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/define/" rel="tag">Define Investing</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/ms/" rel="tag">Morgan Stanley (MS)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/personalfinance/" rel="tag">Personal Finance</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/06/dan_solin_5668-%28wince%29.jpg" /><em>This is the part of a new series of columns called "The Naked Truth," by retirement expert Dan Solin. Please bring him your questions, in the comments box, and he will answer as many as he can. </em><br /><br />Among those who study the financial markets, Eugene F. Fama, the Robert R. McCormick Distinguished Service Professor at the University of Chicago, Graduate School of Business, is an icon.<br /><br />He is a major proponent of the "efficient markets" theory which holds the well documented view that stock prices are random and efficient. <br /><br />Professor Fama believes that analysts are unlikely to find profitable anomalies in stock prices on any consistent basis and he rejects the notion that past performance is a predictor of future performance.<br /><br />Based upon his exhaustive research, Professor Fama believes investors would be well advised simply to capture market returns, by investing in low cost index funds, rather than paying brokers and advisors to select stocks or actively managed mutual funds, in an effort to "beat the markets."<br /><br />At the other end of the investing spectrum is <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/morgan-stanley/ms/nys">Morgan Stanley</a> (NYSE:<a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/morgan-stanley/ms/nys">MS</a>), a purveyor of the daily Wall Street grist, which advises its clients to rely on the expertise of its analysts in making decisions about what stocks to buy or sell and which actively managed mutual fund---and fund manager----is likely to outperform the markets or other funds.<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/09/naked-truth-investing-has-morgan-stanley-seen-the-light/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Naked Truth Investing: Has Morgan Stanley seen the light?</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/09/naked-truth-investing-has-morgan-stanley-seen-the-light/">Naked Truth Investing: Has Morgan Stanley seen the light?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 09 Jun 2008 17:15:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/09/naked-truth-investing-has-morgan-stanley-seen-the-light/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1219228/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/09/naked-truth-investing-has-morgan-stanley-seen-the-light/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Dan Solin</category><category>DanSolin</category><category>Eugene Fama</category><category>EugeneFama</category><category>inthenews</category><category>MS</category><category>Naked Truth Investing</category><category>retirement</category><category>savings</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Daniel Solin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 09 Jun 2008 17:15:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Naked Truth Investing: A good idea, poorly executed.]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/05/naked-truth-investing-a-good-idea-poorly-executed/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/05/naked-truth-investing-a-good-idea-poorly-executed/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/05/naked-truth-investing-a-good-idea-poorly-executed/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/gettingstarted/" rel="tag">Getting Started</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/columns/" rel="tag">Columns</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/06/dan_solin_5668-%28wince%29.jpg" alt="" /><em>This is the part of a new series of columns called "The Naked Truth," by retirement expert Dan Solin. Please bring him your questions, in the comments box, and he will answer as many as he can. <br /></em><br /><em>Question:  Dan, Have you looked at the Monetta Young Investor Fund? It combines the use of ETF's with kids-themed investments. It has a financial literacy component for young investors. </em><br /><br />Answer:    I am all for financial literacy--for adults and for children. Unfortunately, this fund educates its young investors in the <em>wrong</em> way to invest.<br /><br />            The fund invests 50% of its assets in "other funds" that seek to track the performance of the S&amp;P 500 index. The balance is invested in stocks that the manager believes will beat the index. It has an expense ratio of 1.00%.<br /><br />            The best way for <em>all</em> investors to capture the returns of the S&amp;P 500 index (or any other index) is to buy a low cost index fund that tracks that index. For example, the Vanguard S&amp;P500 index fund has an expense ratio of only 0.15%. It will always capture the returns of the index, less these low costs.<br /><br />            The risk of attempting to beat the markets is nicely illustrated by the performance of the Young Investor fund. In the past year it has<em> under performed</em> the index by 0.88%. This is not surprising. Only one in three actively managed funds equals or exceeds its benchmark in any one year, and less than 5% of them do so over a 10-year period.<br /><br />            Parents should educate themselves about investing before they start educating their children. A good place to start, and a very easy read, is John Bogle's excellent book, <em>The Little Book of Common Sense Investing (Wiley 2007).</em><br /><br />            Perhaps he would consider writing a book for young investors!<br /><br /><em>Dan Solin is the author of </em><a href="http://www.amazon.com/Smartest-Investment-Book-Youll-Ever/dp/B000R344PC/ref=pd_sim_b_img_1">The Smartest Investment Book You'll Ever Read (Perigee Books 2006)</a><em> and </em><a href="http://www.amazon.com/Smartest-401k-Book-Youll-Savings/dp/0399534520/002-4799246-6708050?SubscriptionId=15VEWHERF6Q30X94NX82">The Smartest 401(k) Book You'll Ever Read (Perigee Books, June 24, 2008)</a><em><a href="javascript:void(0);/*1212672325849*/">.</a> Visit his website at <a href="http://www.smartestinvestmentbook.com">Smartestinvestmentbook.com.</a></em><br /><br /><br />Tags: Dan Solin, DanSolin, Naked Truth Investing, NakedTruthInvesting, retirement<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/05/naked-truth-investing-a-good-idea-poorly-executed/">Naked Truth Investing: A good idea, poorly executed.</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 05 Jun 2008 12:14:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/05/naked-truth-investing-a-good-idea-poorly-executed/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1216431/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/05/naked-truth-investing-a-good-idea-poorly-executed/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Dan Solin</category><category>inthenews</category><category>Retirement</category><category>Savings</category><category>Young Investor Fund</category><category>YoungInvestorFund</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Daniel Solin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 05 Jun 2008 12:14:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Consumers now spent up, not pent up]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/03/02/consumers-now-spent-up-not-pent-up/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/03/02/consumers-now-spent-up-not-pent-up/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/03/02/consumers-now-spent-up-not-pent-up/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/personalfinance/" rel="tag">Personal Finance</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/recession/" rel="tag">Recession</a></p><p>In another nod to a slowing economy, consumer spending slowed in January, while income growth sputtered as well. <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB120429035319002925.html?mod=rss_whats_news_us"><em>The Wall Street Journal</em> reported recently</a> (subscription required) that the Commerce Department said "personal spending rose 0.4%, but was unchanged after adjusting for inflation. Such spending was also flat in December and October."</p>
<p>It seems to be a perfect storm of sorts. Consumers are cutting spending as they face dropping home prices, high energy prices, tightening credit markets, and a more limited job market.</p>
<p>As consumers spend less, they may be forced to dip into the proverbial cookie jar and start spending rainy-day savings. The same article said, "Rising prices may be prompting consumers to dip into their savings. The personal saving rate fell 0.1% in January, repeating December's performance."</p>
<p>While economists and politicians debate whether the U.S. has dipped into a recession, consumers are already feeling the pinch.</p>
<p><em>Zack Miller is the managing editor of <a href="http://www.israelnewsletter.com/">IsraelNewsletter.com </a>and a former equity analyst for a leading multinational hedge fund.</em><br /><br /></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/03/02/consumers-now-spent-up-not-pent-up/">Consumers now spent up, not pent up</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Sun, 02 Mar 2008 16:10:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/03/02/consumers-now-spent-up-not-pent-up/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1129189/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/03/02/consumers-now-spent-up-not-pent-up/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>consumer spending</category><category>economy</category><category>inthenews</category><category>personal spending</category><category>recession</category><category>savings</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Zack Miller]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 02 Mar 2008 16:10:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Are U.S. consumers moving away from buying on credit?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/02/05/are-u-s-consumers-moving-away-from-buying-on-credit/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/02/05/are-u-s-consumers-moving-away-from-buying-on-credit/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/02/05/are-u-s-consumers-moving-away-from-buying-on-credit/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/consumer-experience/" rel="tag">Consumer Experience</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/economic-data/" rel="tag">Economic Data</a></p>American consumers, the pivotal factor in the consumer-dependent U.S. economy, may have modified their spending philosophy, <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2008/02/05/business/05spend.html?_r=2&amp;ref=business&amp;oref=slogin&amp;oref=slogin"><em>The New York Times</em> reported Tuesday</a>.
<p>Stung by the housing market correction, stagnant wage growth in certain job segments, above-average debt levels, and a slowing economy, Americans are saving more and using credit less -- a shift that some analysts argue is a cultural inflection point of sorts, with huge implications for the economy.<a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2008/02/05/business/05spend.html?_r=2&amp;ref=business&amp;oref=slogin&amp;oref=slogin"> </a></p>
<p>Economist Steve Affinito told BloggingStocks Tuesday that while <em>The Times</em>' interpretative report did not "cite a large enough sample size to meet my fancy," it nonetheless provided data points that support what macroeconomic indicators are saying about consumer choices. </p>
<p>"We know that the savings rate has increased in the last six months, and retail sales are sluggish, at best. Take these and combine them with much tighter credit terms for home equity loans and other credit and what you get is a pull back in purchases, particularly purchases on credit," Affinito said. </p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/02/05/are-u-s-consumers-moving-away-from-buying-on-credit/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Are U.S. consumers moving away from buying on credit?</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/02/05/are-u-s-consumers-moving-away-from-buying-on-credit/">Are U.S. consumers moving away from buying on credit?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 05 Feb 2008 17:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/02/05/are-u-s-consumers-moving-away-from-buying-on-credit/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1107445/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/02/05/are-u-s-consumers-moving-away-from-buying-on-credit/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Baby Boomers</category><category>consumer debt</category><category>consumer spending</category><category>credit</category><category>credit cards</category><category>home equity loans</category><category>inthenews</category><category>savings</category><category>savings rate</category><category>U.S. economy</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Joseph Lazzaro]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 05 Feb 2008 17:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Yield-hungry investors fleeing bonds and savings accounts]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/01/25/yield-hungry-investors-fleeing-bonds-and-savings-accounts/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/01/25/yield-hungry-investors-fleeing-bonds-and-savings-accounts/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/01/25/yield-hungry-investors-fleeing-bonds-and-savings-accounts/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/newspapers/" rel="tag">Newspapers</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/recession/" rel="tag">Recession</a></p><p>The stock market's recent run-up in the face of concerns about a recession could be driven by the Federal Reserve lowering of interest rates.</p>
<p>Usually, rate cuts are seen as boosting economic activity down the road, and hence cause stock markets to rally. But the reason behind this recent run-up may be different. <em>The Wall Street Jour</em>nal <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB120122712126315681.html?mod=todays_us_money_and_investing">reports</a> [subscription required] that "Despite recession fears, slowing profits and signs the credit crisis isn't over, the stock market is attracting a new wave of buyers: investors who are escaping pricey, low-yielding bonds."</p>
<p>It's true -- a 10-year treasury note that yields under 3.7% is a pretty good incentive to dive into the stock market. With concerns about a weakening dollar, investors will be lucky if that 3.7% is anything after inflation takes its bite.</p>
<p>But a run-up that's driven by investors fleeing from bonds and savings accounts might not be sustainable, and certainly doesn't reflect a lessening of concern about economic weakness.</p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/01/25/yield-hungry-investors-fleeing-bonds-and-savings-accounts/">Yield-hungry investors fleeing bonds and savings accounts</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 25 Jan 2008 09:45:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://online.wsj.com/article/SB120122712126315681.html?mod=todays_us_money_and_investing>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/01/25/yield-hungry-investors-fleeing-bonds-and-savings-accounts/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1096559/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/01/25/yield-hungry-investors-fleeing-bonds-and-savings-accounts/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>APR</category><category>Bonds</category><category>Savings</category><category>yield</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Zac Bissonnette]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 25 Jan 2008 09:45:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Yo Santa: Stuff my stocking with these three stocks]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/12/14/yo-santa-stuff-my-stocking-with-these-three-stocks/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/12/14/yo-santa-stuff-my-stocking-with-these-three-stocks/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/12/14/yo-santa-stuff-my-stocking-with-these-three-stocks/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/axp/" rel="tag">American Express (AXP)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/israel/" rel="tag">Israel</a></p><p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2006/11/stocking_christmas.jpg" />With just ten more shopping days until Christmas, it's time for a stocking stuffer wish list. With the recent market selloff, bargains are abound. If you think the 15% off sales in your favorite department store are interesting, here are stocks that are REALLY on sale, and would make the perfect stocking stuffer.</p>
<p>For <a href="http://AXP"> American Express</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/american-express-company/axp/nys">AXP</a>), the shopping season is going better than all the pessimists thought it would and the credit card company should stand to gain. In addition, since the market tends to be a leading economic indicator that looks out six months into the future, I would expect a strong pickup in growth in the second half of '08, which should also help earnings. With this stock trading down to levels not seen in 15 months, the stock is looking attractive for a turnaround.</p>
<p><a href="http://CKSW">ClickSoftware</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/clicksoftware-technologies-ltd/cksw/nas?tabs=quotesandnews">CKSW</a>) is the leading provider of mobile workforce management and service optimization solutions. With mobile applications just starting to come online into the market, this company could be a real winner. This <a href="http://israelnewsletter.com/israeli-stocks-trading-in-the-us/">stock</a> isn't for the weak of heart, having dropped 43% from the 52 week-high. That being said, business is shaping up to be really strong for '08.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/12/14/yo-santa-stuff-my-stocking-with-these-three-stocks/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Yo Santa: Stuff my stocking with these three stocks</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/12/14/yo-santa-stuff-my-stocking-with-these-three-stocks/">Yo Santa: Stuff my stocking with these three stocks</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 14 Dec 2007 14:54:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://israelnewsletter.com/2007/10/31/clicksoftware-buy-on-weekness/>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/12/14/yo-santa-stuff-my-stocking-with-these-three-stocks/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1062778/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/12/14/yo-santa-stuff-my-stocking-with-these-three-stocks/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>american express</category><category>AmericanExpress</category><category>clicksoftware</category><category>israel</category><category>savings</category><category>snata claus</category><category>SnataClaus</category><category>stocking stuffers</category><category>US bancorp</category><category>UsBancorp</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Aaron Katsman]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 14 Dec 2007 14:54:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Greenspan says globalization a factor in housing bubble]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/12/14/greenspan-says-globalization-a-factor-in-housing-bubble/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/12/14/greenspan-says-globalization-a-factor-in-housing-bubble/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/12/14/greenspan-says-globalization-a-factor-in-housing-bubble/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/international-markets/" rel="tag">International Markets</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/forecasts/" rel="tag">Forecasts</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/other-issues/" rel="tag">Other Issues</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/china/" rel="tag">China</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/russia/" rel="tag">Russia</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/japan/" rel="tag">Japan</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/housing/" rel="tag">Housing</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/federal-reserve/" rel="tag">Federal Reserve</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/11/alan-greenspan.jpg" />When the typical investor speaks, Wall Street listens, to a degree. When Alan Greenspan speaks, Wall Street listens very closely.<br /><br />Greenspan, who served as Chairman of the <a href="http://www.federalreserve.gov/">U.S. Federal Reserve</a> for 18 years, said that while it's too soon to say a U.S. recession is up ahead, "the odds are clearly rising," <a href="http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=17210282">National Public Radio reported.</a> Greenspan added that U.S. economic growth is "getting close to stall speed."<br /><br />Greenspan, 81, left the Fed in January 2006 after nearly two decades as leader of the world's most powerful central bank. When he left, the U.S. economy was growing at or near trend levels, or what economists call 'sustainable growth' levels. <br /><br />However, the increase in subprime mortgage and related asset defaults, the housing sector's correction and persistently high energy prices, are expected to cool the current U.S. economic expansion, which began in 2001. Many economists expect Q4 2007 GDP growth to slow to 2.5-2.9%. Some are predicting an economic recession at the start of 2008. The U.S. economy grew at a 4.9% rate in Q3 2007.<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/12/14/greenspan-says-globalization-a-factor-in-housing-bubble/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Greenspan says globalization a factor in housing bubble</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/12/14/greenspan-says-globalization-a-factor-in-housing-bubble/">Greenspan says globalization a factor in housing bubble</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 14 Dec 2007 13:22:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=17210282>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/12/14/greenspan-says-globalization-a-factor-in-housing-bubble/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1063074/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/12/14/greenspan-says-globalization-a-factor-in-housing-bubble/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Alan Greenspan</category><category>China</category><category>Europe</category><category>featured</category><category>global economy</category><category>globalization</category><category>Greenspan</category><category>housing</category><category>HousingBubble</category><category>monetary policy</category><category>mortgage rates</category><category>mortgages</category><category>Russia</category><category>savings</category><category>U.S. economy</category><category>U.S. Federal Reserve</category><category>U.S. Treasuries</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Joseph Lazzaro]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 14 Dec 2007 13:22:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[U.S. dollar rises against major currencies]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/11/28/u-s-dollar-firms-for-now-against-major-currencies/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/11/28/u-s-dollar-firms-for-now-against-major-currencies/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/11/28/u-s-dollar-firms-for-now-against-major-currencies/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/international-markets/" rel="tag">International Markets</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/c/" rel="tag">Citigroup Inc. (C)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/federal-reserve/" rel="tag">Federal Reserve</a></p><p><img alt="" hspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/11/dollarsign-at150-02blog.jpg" align="right" vspace="4" border="0" />The dollar rose to one-week highs against the world's major currencies Wednesday, as currency traders took profits following extensive dollar declines over the past 10 weeks. </p>
<p>Traders said Abu Dhabi Investment Authority's $7.5 billion investment in <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/c/usa?tabs=quotesandnews">Citigroup</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/c/usa?tabs=quotesandnews">C</a>) contributed to the trading session's pro-dollar sentiment, on the belief that deep-pocketed, patient global investors may be able to provide capital to help keep key credit markets liquid in the quarters ahead.<br /><br />The <a href="http://www.forex.com">dollar</a> improved to $1.4768 against <a href="http://www.forex.com">euro</a>, to $2.0681 against the <a href="http://www.forex.com">British pound</a>, and to 109.70 yen against the <a href="http://www.forex.com">Japanese yen</a>. </p>
<p>Currency trader Andrew Resnick, formerly of Next Capital of New York, told BloggingStocks Wednesday that the dollar's rise should not delude one into thinking there's been a fundamental change in currency conditions: </p>
<p>"I see nothing changing structurally. We've got the U.S. trade deficit, a slowing U.S. economy, and the possibility of another rate cut by the Federal Reserve, so pressure will resume on the dollar," Resnick said. "We may not see as many players in the carry trade, but the long-term bias remains dollar-lower."</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/11/28/u-s-dollar-firms-for-now-against-major-currencies/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>U.S. dollar rises against major currencies</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/11/28/u-s-dollar-firms-for-now-against-major-currencies/">U.S. dollar rises against major currencies</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 28 Nov 2007 12:35:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/11/28/u-s-dollar-firms-for-now-against-major-currencies/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1049829/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/11/28/u-s-dollar-firms-for-now-against-major-currencies/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>British pound</category><category>budget deficit</category><category>consumer spending</category><category>dollar</category><category>euro</category><category>GDP</category><category>interest rates</category><category>inthenews</category><category>oil</category><category>oil prices</category><category>pound</category><category>savings</category><category>savings rate</category><category>Swiss franc</category><category>trade</category><category>trade deficit</category><category>U.S. economy</category><category>yen</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Joseph Lazzaro]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 28 Nov 2007 12:35:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Is the U.S. in a 'growth recession'?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/11/21/is-the-u-s-in-a-growth-recession/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/11/21/is-the-u-s-in-a-growth-recession/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/11/21/is-the-u-s-in-a-growth-recession/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/international-markets/" rel="tag">International Markets</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/forecasts/" rel="tag">Forecasts</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/other-issues/" rel="tag">Other Issues</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/china/" rel="tag">China</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/russia/" rel="tag">Russia</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/middle-east/" rel="tag">Middle East</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/canada/" rel="tag">Canada</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/eastern-europe/" rel="tag">Eastern Europe</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/federal-reserve/" rel="tag">Federal Reserve</a></p>There's an old Wall Street adage that goes, "Sometimes the Street's chorus is a chorus of two." <br /><br />And there's perhaps no better example of that than the current debate over the strength of the U.S. economy. Professionals in the <a href="http://clausvistesen.squarespace.com/alphasources-blog/2006/1/4/buttonwood-ceo-bonuses-as-a-function-of-roe-yeah-right.html">Concrete Canyon</a> have been amassing on either side of two camps for months: "The U.S. economy is headed toward recession" or "The U.S. economy will continue to grow."<br /><br />Still, as history demonstrates, and contrary to the current 'chorus' on Wall Street, sometimes there are more than two options. For example, what if the U.S. economy is headed toward a <em>growth recession</em>? I.E. a protracted period of sub-trend GDP growth.<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/11/21/is-the-u-s-in-a-growth-recession/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Is the U.S. in a 'growth recession'?</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/11/21/is-the-u-s-in-a-growth-recession/">Is the U.S. in a 'growth recession'?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 21 Nov 2007 18:27:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/11/21/is-the-u-s-in-a-growth-recession/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1045819/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/11/21/is-the-u-s-in-a-growth-recession/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Canada</category><category>China</category><category>consumer spending</category><category>EU</category><category>European Union</category><category>exports</category><category>fiscal policy</category><category>GDP</category><category>global economy</category><category>imports</category><category>Martin Wolf</category><category>Middle East</category><category>oil</category><category>personal savings</category><category>PersonalSavings</category><category>private investment</category><category>Russia</category><category>savings</category><category>subprime mortgages</category><category>the great unwinding</category><category>trade</category><category>U.S. Congress</category><category>U.S. economy</category><category>United States</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Joseph Lazzaro]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 21 Nov 2007 18:27:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Rogers sees more dog days for US dollar in 2008]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/11/05/rogers-sees-more-dog-days-for-dollar-in-2008/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/11/05/rogers-sees-more-dog-days-for-dollar-in-2008/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/11/05/rogers-sees-more-dog-days-for-dollar-in-2008/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/international-markets/" rel="tag">International Markets</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/other-issues/" rel="tag">Other Issues</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/federal-reserve/" rel="tag">Federal Reserve</a></p><span style="font-style: italic;">In the coming weeks, bloggingstocks.com will review those stocks most likely to benefit under each scenario: a weak dollar or a strong dollar.</span><br /><br />Commodities expert Jim Rogers is on-record with where he thinks the U.S. dollar is headed in 2008: down. That, in and of itself, is not news.<br /><br /> "It doesn't take a genius to figure out that it's a currency that's going to be going down for some time to come," Rogers said in an interview with the <a href="http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/8e8d7af4-8967-11dc-b52e-0000779fd2ac.html">Financial Times.</a> Rogers added that in his interpretation the U.S. Federal Reserve's and the U.S. Treasury's willingness to print money and drive down the greenback is clear.<br /><br />Among other consequences of the dollar's continued fall, Roger sees higher commodity prices, a rise in U.S. inflation, and a rise in China's currency, the yuan (if the Chinese government lets it rise more). Rogers, chairman of Beeland Interests Inc., said he is also shorting shares of <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/citigroup-incorporated/c/nys">Citigroup</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/citigroup-incorporated/c/nys">C</a>). [Citigroup's shares closed down $1.92 to $35.81Monday after the company said it will have to write-off $8 billion-$11 billion to account for the reduced value of subprime mortgage-related securities.]<br /><br />All of which begs a good question by the investor / reader: <em>How did the U.S. dollar drop so much in value?</em><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/11/05/rogers-sees-more-dog-days-for-dollar-in-2008/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Rogers sees more dog days for US dollar in 2008</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/11/05/rogers-sees-more-dog-days-for-dollar-in-2008/">Rogers sees more dog days for US dollar in 2008</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 05 Nov 2007 17:57:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/11/05/rogers-sees-more-dog-days-for-dollar-in-2008/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1030862/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/11/05/rogers-sees-more-dog-days-for-dollar-in-2008/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Bank of England</category><category>Bank of Japan</category><category>Beeland Interests</category><category>C</category><category>Canada</category><category>Canadian dollar</category><category>China</category><category>Citigroup</category><category>Congress</category><category>consumption</category><category>dollar</category><category>ECB</category><category>euro</category><category>Europe</category><category>F</category><category>Federal Reserve</category><category>Ford</category><category>foreign exchange</category><category>GDP</category><category>GeneralMotors</category><category>GM</category><category>JimRogers</category><category>mercantilism</category><category>pound</category><category>Rogers</category><category>savings</category><category>Swiss Franc</category><category>trade</category><category>trade deficit</category><category>TradeDeficit</category><category>U.S. Congress</category><category>U.S. dollar</category><category>yuan</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Joseph Lazzaro]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 05 Nov 2007 17:57:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[FDIC shuts down NetBank]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/09/30/fdic-shuts-down-netbank/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/09/30/fdic-shuts-down-netbank/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/09/30/fdic-shuts-down-netbank/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/products-and-services/" rel="tag">Products and Services</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/industry/" rel="tag">Industry</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/consumer-experience/" rel="tag">Consumer Experience</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/competitive-strategy/" rel="tag">Competitive Strategy</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/personalfinance/" rel="tag">Personal Finance</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="right" alt="NetBank logo" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/09/netbank-logo.gif" />NetBank, the online bank with $2.5 billion in assets, has been <a href="http://money.aol.com/news/articles/_a/regulators-shut-online-bank-netbank/n20070928182709990009">shut down by the FDIC</a> after investments in risky mortgages defaulted at an alarming rate. Customers with less than $100,000 with the bank will be made whole by FDIC insurance, and those with more will become creditors in the bank's receivership.<br /><br />While these failures are pretty rare, there are two lessons that investors/savers can take from it:<br /><br />
<ul>
    <li>FDIC insurance covers $100,000 of your money with each bank. To avoid the potential for stress (being a creditor in receivership is not a lot of fun), avoid putting more than $100,000 with any one bank. With high-yield savings accounts from banks including EmigrantDirect, <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/e-trade-financial-corporation/etfc/nas">E*Trade</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/e-trade-financial-corporation/etfc/nas">ETFC</a>), <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/capital-one-financial-corporation/cof/nys">Capital One</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/capital-one-financial-corporation/cof/nys">COF</a>), and <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/ing-group-nv-ads/ing/nys">ING</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/ing-group-nv-ads/ing/nys">ING</a>), you should be able to find enough banks to spread out your savings, unless your last name happens to be Rockefeller. </li>
    <li>Already, a well-meaning friend who works at a bank told me about the NetBank meltdown, and explained that "These high-yield savings accounts are very risky. It's much better to go with a brick and mortar bank, even if the interest rate is 1% instead of 5%." Many retail banks will start trying to use that logic to trick customers into saving with them. It's a bunch of crap! Never trust your bank! </li>
</ul><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/09/30/fdic-shuts-down-netbank/">FDIC shuts down NetBank</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Sun, 30 Sep 2007 09:10:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/09/30/fdic-shuts-down-netbank/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1001163/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/09/30/fdic-shuts-down-netbank/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Banking</category><category>Capital One</category><category>COF</category><category>E*Trade</category><category>EmigrantDirect</category><category>ETFC</category><category>FDIC</category><category>ING</category><category>inthenews</category><category>NetBank</category><category>online banks</category><category>Savings</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Zac Bissonnette]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 30 Sep 2007 09:10:00 EST</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
