<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd">
<channel>
<title>BloggingStocks</title>
<link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com</link>
<description>BloggingStocks</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Google Sells Off After Missing Earnings Estimate]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/07/16/google-earnings-miss/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/07/16/google-earnings-miss/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/07/16/google-earnings-miss/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/earnings-reports/" rel="tag">Earnings Reports</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/forecasts/" rel="tag">Forecasts</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/bad-news/" rel="tag">Bad News</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/goog/" rel="tag">Google (GOOG)</a></p><img hspace="4" vspace="4" border="0" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2009/12/google-logo-200x150.jpg" alt="Google Q2 Earnings Report" />Shares of search engine giant Google (<a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/google-inc/goog/nas" class="inlinked">GOOG</a>) fell by $19 per share (almost 4%) in after-hours trading Thursday after the California-based company was <a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/story/google-earnings-miss-wall-street-expectations-shares-fall/19556302/">unable to hit estimates</a> for its second quarter.<br />
<br />
As we noted in our <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/07/15/google-earnings-preview/">earnings preview</a>, Google has done very well over the past couple of years, and the company has outpaced analyst estimates each of the past seven quarters.<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/07/16/google-earnings-miss/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Google Sells Off After Missing Earnings Estimate</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/07/16/google-earnings-miss/">Google Sells Off After Missing Earnings Estimate</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 16 Jul 2010 09:30:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/07/16/google-earnings-miss/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19556472/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/07/16/google-earnings-miss/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>ads</category><category>advertising</category><category>earnings</category><category>featured</category><category>GOOG</category><category>Google</category><category>google ads</category><category>internet</category><category>search</category><category>youtube</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Michael Fowlkes]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 16 Jul 2010 09:30:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Twitter Unveils Google Ad Model, Despite Hype]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/03/01/twitter-unveils-google-ad-model-despite-hype/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/03/01/twitter-unveils-google-ad-model-despite-hype/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/03/01/twitter-unveils-google-ad-model-despite-hype/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/internet/" rel="tag">Internet</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/goog/" rel="tag">Google (GOOG)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/nws/" rel="tag">News Corp'B' (NWS)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/media-world/" rel="tag">Media World</a></p><p><img hspace="4" vspace="4" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2010/02/twitter.jpg" alt="" />Apparently, all the hype wasn't worth it. After <a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/story/media/help-wanted-twitter-seeks-staff-who-can-shake-its-monetizer/19311133/" target="_blank">Twitter COO Dick Costolo explained that the company was going to unveil a "non-traditional" advertising model</a> and claimed that "people will love it," what we're seeing is a foray into decidedly charted territory.</p>
<p><a href="http://mediamemo.allthingsd.com/20100226/twitters-ad-plan-copy-google/" target="_blank">According to AllThingsD</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/tag/Twitter/">Twitter</a>'s ad model will resemble the one that has been so successful for search and online ad giant Google (<a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/google-inc/goog/nas" target="_blank">GOOG</a>). Ads, essentially, will be tied to search.</p>
<p>Yawn.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/03/01/twitter-unveils-google-ad-model-despite-hype/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Twitter Unveils Google Ad Model, Despite Hype</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/03/01/twitter-unveils-google-ad-model-despite-hype/">Twitter Unveils Google Ad Model, Despite Hype</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 01 Mar 2010 10:10:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/03/01/twitter-unveils-google-ad-model-despite-hype/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19376826/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/03/01/twitter-unveils-google-ad-model-despite-hype/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>advertising</category><category>goog</category><category>google</category><category>inthenews</category><category>news corp</category><category>NWS</category><category>online ads</category><category>online advertising</category><category>search</category><category>social media</category><category>twitter</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tom Johansmeyer]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 01 Mar 2010 10:10:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Bank of America chairman sails away while company seeks new CEO]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/12/bank-of-america-chairman-sails-away-while-company-seeks-new-ceo/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/12/bank-of-america-chairman-sails-away-while-company-seeks-new-ceo/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/12/bank-of-america-chairman-sails-away-while-company-seeks-new-ceo/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/management/" rel="tag">Management</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/bac/" rel="tag">Bank of America (BAC)</a></p><p><img border="1" hspace="4" vspace="4" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.dailyfinance.com/media/2009/09/bac.jpg" alt="" />Bank of America (<a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/bank-of-america-corporation/bac/nys">BAC</a>) is in the midst of a frantic <a href="http://www.usatoday.com/money/industries/banking/2009-11-12-bankofamerica12_ST_N.htm">search for a CEO</a> to succeed Ken Lewis, who is stepping down before the end of the year.</p>
<p>In an article on Bank of America's murky succession plan, <em>USA Today</em> buries this newsworthy factoid seven paragraphs down. From the "You can't make this stuff up" department:</p>
<p><em>BofA Chairman Walter Massey, who is leading the search, is currently on vacation on a ship and will not be reachable until Nov. 23, according to Morehouse College, where Massey is president emeritus.</em></p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/12/bank-of-america-chairman-sails-away-while-company-seeks-new-ceo/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Bank of America chairman sails away while company seeks new CEO</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/12/bank-of-america-chairman-sails-away-while-company-seeks-new-ceo/">Bank of America chairman sails away while company seeks new CEO</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 12 Nov 2009 12:20:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/12/bank-of-america-chairman-sails-away-while-company-seeks-new-ceo/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19234297/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/12/bank-of-america-chairman-sails-away-while-company-seeks-new-ceo/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>BAC</category><category>Bank of America</category><category>CEO</category><category>chairman</category><category>inthenews</category><category>Ken Lewis</category><category>replacement</category><category>search</category><category>succession</category><category>Walter Massey</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Zac Bissonnette]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 12 Nov 2009 12:20:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Would anybody buy Jeeves? Ask might go on block]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/28/would-anybody-buy-jeeves-ask-might-go-on-block/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/28/would-anybody-buy-jeeves-ask-might-go-on-block/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/28/would-anybody-buy-jeeves-ask-might-go-on-block/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/deals/" rel="tag">Deals</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/rumors/" rel="tag">Rumors</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/internet/" rel="tag">Internet</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/goog/" rel="tag">Google (GOOG)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/msft/" rel="tag">Microsoft (MSFT)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/yhoo/" rel="tag">Yahoo! (YHOO)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/iaci/" rel="tag">IAC/InterActiveCorp (IACI)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/technology/" rel="tag">Technology</a></p><p><img border="1" hspace="4" alt="" vspace="4" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/02/iaci-iac-interactive-logo.jpg" />Unless you already have a major foothold in the <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/tag/searchengine/">search engine</a> market - or an amazing, disruptive technology that can make the world take notice - there isn't much point in staying. Competing with <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/google-inc/goog/nas" target="_blank">Google</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/google-inc/goog/nas" target="_blank">GOOG</a>) is hard enough, even when you're <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/yahoo-inc/yhoo/nas" target="_blank">Yahoo</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/yahoo-inc/yhoo/nas" target="_blank">YHOO</a>) or <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/microsoft-corporation/msft/nas" target="_blank">Microsoft</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/microsoft-corporation/msft/nas" target="_blank">MSFT</a>) ... and, apparently, when you're <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/iac-interactivecorp/iaci/nas" target="_blank">IAC/InterActive Corp</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/iac-interactivecorp/iaci/nas" target="_blank">IACI</a>). <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/tag/BarryDiller/">Barry Diller</a> is ready to give up Jeeves, <a href="http://www.nypost.com/p/news/business/if_you_want_to_buy_jeeves_just_ask_LzqBrdDodfWaAEylSOgPHO" target="_blank">but only if asked nicely</a>. </p>
<p>Diller's presence in the search space is <a href="http://www.ask.com" target="_blank">Ask.com</a>, ranked #4 behind Google, Yahoo and Microsoft's <a href="http://www.bing.com" target="_blank">Bing</a>. With a substantial gap between first and second, fourth barely registers at all. Ask.com has only a 2% U.S. market share, according to Hitwise, more than 60 percentage points behind the industry leader.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/28/would-anybody-buy-jeeves-ask-might-go-on-block/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Would anybody buy Jeeves? Ask might go on block</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/28/would-anybody-buy-jeeves-ask-might-go-on-block/">Would anybody buy Jeeves? Ask might go on block</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 28 Oct 2009 15:30:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.nypost.com/p/news/business/if_you_want_to_buy_jeeves_just_ask_LzqBrdDodfWaAEylSOgPHO>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/28/would-anybody-buy-jeeves-ask-might-go-on-block/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19213152/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/28/would-anybody-buy-jeeves-ask-might-go-on-block/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>barry diller</category><category>BarryDiller</category><category>bing</category><category>diller</category><category>goog</category><category>google</category><category>iaci</category><category>iacinteractive</category><category>iacinteractivecorp</category><category>inthenews</category><category>microsoft</category><category>microsoft bing</category><category>microsoft msft</category><category>MicrosoftBing</category><category>MicrosoftMsft</category><category>msft</category><category>msft microsoft</category><category>MsftMicrosoft</category><category>search</category><category>search engine</category><category>search engines</category><category>SearchEngine</category><category>SearchEngines</category><category>yahoo</category><category>yhoo</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tom Johansmeyer]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 28 Oct 2009 15:30:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Baidu reports third quarter data: Buy stock on pull-back?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/27/baidu-reports-third-quarter-data-buy-stock-on-pullbacks/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/27/baidu-reports-third-quarter-data-buy-stock-on-pullbacks/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/27/baidu-reports-third-quarter-data-buy-stock-on-pullbacks/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/earnings-reports/" rel="tag">Earnings Reports</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/internet/" rel="tag">Internet</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/goog/" rel="tag">Google (GOOG)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/technology/" rel="tag">Technology</a></p><p><img hspace="4" border="1" align="right" vspace="4" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/10/baidu-bidu-logo.jpg" /><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/baidu-inc-ads/bidu/nas">Baidu</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/baidu-inc-ads/bidu/nas">BIDU</a>), China's leading search engine, sold off during Monday's after-hours session after the earnings report for the <a href="http://money.aol.com/rtn/pr/baidu-announces-third-quarter-2009-results/rfid264534947?channel=pf">third quarter</a> was issued. When you're a theoretical growth company like Baidu, missing estimates on the guidance side is never a good thing to do.</p>
<p>Nevertheless, Baidu delivered in Q3 itself. Sales skyrocketed 39%. Net income per share exploded over 40% to the upside, coming in at $2.07 per share on a <a href="http://finance.aol.com/glossary/Generally%20Accepted%20Accounting%20Principles%20-%20GAAP">GAAP</a> basis. Adjusting for items, the company earned $2.16 per share. <a href="http://www.earnings.com/company.asp?client=cb&amp;ticker=bidu">Earnings.com</a> gives an expectation of $1.81 for per-share profit.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/27/baidu-reports-third-quarter-data-buy-stock-on-pullbacks/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Baidu reports third quarter data: Buy stock on pull-back?</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/27/baidu-reports-third-quarter-data-buy-stock-on-pullbacks/">Baidu reports third quarter data: Buy stock on pull-back?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 27 Oct 2009 08:30:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://money.aol.com/rtn/pr/baidu-announces-third-quarter-2009-results/rfid264534947?channel=pf>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/27/baidu-reports-third-quarter-data-buy-stock-on-pullbacks/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19210478/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/27/baidu-reports-third-quarter-data-buy-stock-on-pullbacks/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Baidu</category><category>BIDU</category><category>China</category><category>GOOG</category><category>Google</category><category>inthenews</category><category>search</category><category>web</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Steven Mallas]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 27 Oct 2009 08:30:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Microsoft now in bed with Twitter]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/22/microsoft-now-in-bed-with-twitter/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/22/microsoft-now-in-bed-with-twitter/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/22/microsoft-now-in-bed-with-twitter/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/internet/" rel="tag">Internet</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/goog/" rel="tag">Google (GOOG)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/msft/" rel="tag">Microsoft (MSFT)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/media-world/" rel="tag">Media World</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/technology/" rel="tag">Technology</a></p><p><img border="1" hspace="4" alt="" vspace="4" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2009/06/twitter_logo_200.jpg" />It's tough to take on <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/google-inc/goog/nas" target="_blank">Google</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/google-inc/goog/nas" target="_blank">GOOG</a>). The <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/20/yahoo-preview-will-stock-see-a-bid-after-q3-report/" target="_blank">search engine behemoth owns 65% of the U.S. search market</a> and has a commanding brand presence. Yet, the software maker up the coast isn't known to give up easily. <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/microsoft-corporation/msft/nas" target="_blank">Microsoft</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/microsoft-corporation/msft/nas" target="_blank">MSFT</a>) has <a href="http://www.usatoday.com/money/industries/technology/2009-10-21-microsoft-twitter-search_N.htm" target="_blank">cut a deal with microblogging site Twitter</a> that should give it an edge in the battle to harness data and make it easier to find. A new deal will feed all those tweets into Bing, the Microsoft <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/tag/searchengine/">search engine</a>.</p>
<p><a href="http://twitter.com" target="_blank">Twitter</a> is giving Microsoft full access to its data, in a deal announced Wednesday. Bing will provide search functionality for Twitter that you won't find in Google, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/11/twitter-holds-out-tin-cup-to-microsoft-and-google/" target="_blank">which seems to have been outbid for the rights to the "tweet-stream."</a> Under the deal, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/tag/Bing/">Bing</a> will be able to index and display the tweets almost immediately as they are posted.</p>
<p> </p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/22/microsoft-now-in-bed-with-twitter/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Microsoft now in bed with Twitter</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/22/microsoft-now-in-bed-with-twitter/">Microsoft now in bed with Twitter</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 22 Oct 2009 09:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.usatoday.com/money/industries/technology/2009-10-21-microsoft-twitter-search_N.htm>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/22/microsoft-now-in-bed-with-twitter/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19204969/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/22/microsoft-now-in-bed-with-twitter/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>advertising</category><category>bing</category><category>data</category><category>featured</category><category>goog</category><category>google</category><category>microsoft</category><category>msft</category><category>search</category><category>search engine</category><category>search engines</category><category>tweetdeck</category><category>twitter</category><category>ubertwitter</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tom Johansmeyer]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 22 Oct 2009 09:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Yahoo profit triples year-over-year]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/21/yahoo-profit-triples-year-over-year/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/21/yahoo-profit-triples-year-over-year/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/21/yahoo-profit-triples-year-over-year/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/earnings-reports/" rel="tag">Earnings Reports</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/good-news/" rel="tag">Good news</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/internet/" rel="tag">Internet</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/goog/" rel="tag">Google (GOOG)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/msft/" rel="tag">Microsoft (MSFT)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/yhoo/" rel="tag">Yahoo! (YHOO)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/technology/" rel="tag">Technology</a></p><p><img alt="" hspace="4" align="right" vspace="4" border="1" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/01/yhoo-yahoo!-logo.jpg" />The number two search engine in the United States turned in a fantastic third quarter, <a target="_blank" href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/20/yahoo-preview-will-stock-see-a-bid-after-q3-report/">far ahead of expectations</a>. Cost-cutting, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/tag/layoffs/">layoffs</a> and business divestitures led to a surge in <a target="_blank" href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/yahoo-inc/yhoo/nas">Yahoo</a>'s (NASDAQ: <a target="_blank" href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/yahoo-inc/yhoo/nas">YHOO</a>) profits and a <a target="_blank" href="http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&amp;sid=azVdW1WN4goY">4.8% increase in share price in extended trading on Tuesday evening</a>. Net income more than tripled to $186.1 million (13 cents per share) from the third quarter of 2008's result of $54.3 million (4 cents a share). Sales (exclusive of fees passed to partner sites) reached $1.13 billion, slightly above the $1.12 billion expected by analysts, according to a Bloomberg survey. <br />
<br />
With the advertising market in rough shape and competition from <a target="_blank" href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/google-inc/goog/nas">Google</a> (NASDAQ: <a target="_blank" href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/google-inc/goog/nas">GOOG</a>) continually rising, Yahoo refocused on its core properties: the home page, messaging and mobile services. The company trimmed what it didn't need, which is why it was able to boost its earnings even with a decline in revenue. Increased ad revenue from auto manufacturers, travel companies and consumer product manufacturers also helped.<br />
<br />
Yahoo's chief financial officer, Timothy Morse, says that the company's markets are "starting to stabilize." Of course, Yahoo itself must be doing something right: its share price is up 41% this year.</p>
<p><br />
 </p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/21/yahoo-profit-triples-year-over-year/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Yahoo profit triples year-over-year</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/21/yahoo-profit-triples-year-over-year/">Yahoo profit triples year-over-year</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 21 Oct 2009 08:30:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&amp;sid=azVdW1WN4goY>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/21/yahoo-profit-triples-year-over-year/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19203400/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/21/yahoo-profit-triples-year-over-year/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>advertising</category><category>featured</category><category>goog</category><category>google</category><category>layoffs</category><category>microsoft</category><category>msft</category><category>online ad</category><category>online ad sales</category><category>online ads</category><category>online advertising</category><category>OnlineAds</category><category>OnlineAdSales</category><category>OnlineAdvertising</category><category>search</category><category>search engine</category><category>search engines</category><category>SearchEngine</category><category>SearchEngines</category><category>yahoo</category><category>yhoo</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tom Johansmeyer]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 21 Oct 2009 08:30:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Google finds growth and cash in the third quarter]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/16/google-finds-growth-and-cash-in-the-third-quarter/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/16/google-finds-growth-and-cash-in-the-third-quarter/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/16/google-finds-growth-and-cash-in-the-third-quarter/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/earnings-reports/" rel="tag">Earnings Reports</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/internet/" rel="tag">Internet</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/goog/" rel="tag">Google (GOOG)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/msft/" rel="tag">Microsoft (MSFT)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/yhoo/" rel="tag">Yahoo! (YHOO)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/technology/" rel="tag">Technology</a></p><p><img alt="" hspace="4" align="right" vspace="4" border="1" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/07/google.jpg" /><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/google-inc/goog/nas">Google</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/google-inc/goog/nas">GOOG</a>) increased both sales and income in the <a href="http://money.aol.com/rtn/pr/google-announces-third-quarter-2009-results/rfid261143256?channel=pf">third quarter</a>. The giant of online search, which issued its earnings release after the bell on Thursday, <a href="http://money.cnn.com/2009/10/15/technology/google_earnings/?postversion=2009101517">is saying</a> what a plethora of companies are also saying: the worst of the economic downturn may finally be over.</p>
<p>According to <a href="http://www.thestreet.com/story/10612283/1/google-smashes-targets-with-strong-sales.html">TheStreet.com</a>, sales, after traffic acquisition costs are taken into account, rose about 8%. On an adjusted basis, profit grew almost 20% to $5.89 per share. Our <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/11/week-in-preview-goldman-sachs-jpmorgan-google-ibm-and-more/">earnings preview</a> article stated that expectations were for $5.38 per share. Google did a good job of giving the world a reason to believe that the rallies seen in the major market indexes should be taken seriously.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/16/google-finds-growth-and-cash-in-the-third-quarter/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Google finds growth and cash in the third quarter</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/16/google-finds-growth-and-cash-in-the-third-quarter/">Google finds growth and cash in the third quarter</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 16 Oct 2009 08:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://money.aol.com/rtn/pr/google-announces-third-quarter-2009-results/rfid261143256?channel=pf>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/16/google-finds-growth-and-cash-in-the-third-quarter/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19197919/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/16/google-finds-growth-and-cash-in-the-third-quarter/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Bing</category><category>featured</category><category>GOOG</category><category>Google</category><category>microsoft</category><category>MSFT</category><category>search</category><category>tech stocks</category><category>TechStocks</category><category>yahoo</category><category>YHOO</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Steven Mallas]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 16 Oct 2009 08:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Microsoft not looking for search engine acquisitions]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/05/microsoft-not-looking-for-search-engine-acquisitions/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/05/microsoft-not-looking-for-search-engine-acquisitions/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/05/microsoft-not-looking-for-search-engine-acquisitions/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/goog/" rel="tag">Google (GOOG)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/msft/" rel="tag">Microsoft (MSFT)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/yhoo/" rel="tag">Yahoo! (YHOO)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/technology/" rel="tag">Technology</a></p><p><img border="1" hspace="4" alt="" vspace="4" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/04/microsoft-yahoo.jpg" /><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/microsoft-corporation/msft/nas" target="_blank">Microsoft</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/microsoft-corporation/msft/nas" target="_blank">MSFT</a>) isn't planning to <a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/technologyNews/idUSTRE5941A520091005" target="_blank">acquire its way into the search engine market</a>. The company's CEO, Steve Ballmer, told Reuters that the company would invest in marketing and hopefully complete a partnership with <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/yahoo-inc/yhoo/nas" target="_blank">Yahoo!</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/yahoo-inc/yhoo/nas" target="_blank">YHOO</a>) that is currently involved in a regulatory review. The goal, of course, is to provide at least meaningful competition to search giant and dominant market player <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/google-inc/goog/nas" target="_blank">Google</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/google-inc/goog/nas" target="_blank">GOOG</a>).</p>
<p>Expect growth to slow a bit for Microsoft, Ballmer says, as a result of global economic developments. In order to cope with this -- and gear up for a potential battle with Google -- the company has frozen its R&amp;D budget of $9.5 billion, the largest in the industry. With that and a $31.4 billion cash and cash equivalent position, Microsoft certainly has the resources to do battle.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/05/microsoft-not-looking-for-search-engine-acquisitions/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Microsoft not looking for search engine acquisitions</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/05/microsoft-not-looking-for-search-engine-acquisitions/">Microsoft not looking for search engine acquisitions</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 05 Oct 2009 09:40:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.reuters.com/article/technologyNews/idUSTRE5941A520091005>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/05/microsoft-not-looking-for-search-engine-acquisitions/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19184340/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/05/microsoft-not-looking-for-search-engine-acquisitions/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>bing</category><category>goog</category><category>google</category><category>inthenews</category><category>microsoft</category><category>msft</category><category>msft-yhoo</category><category>search</category><category>search engines</category><category>yahoo</category><category>yhoo</category><category>yhoo-msft</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tom Johansmeyer]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 05 Oct 2009 09:40:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Google China loses its head]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/06/google-china-loses-its-head/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/06/google-china-loses-its-head/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/06/google-china-loses-its-head/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/goog/" rel="tag">Google (GOOG)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/msft/" rel="tag">Microsoft (MSFT)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/china/" rel="tag">China</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/technology/" rel="tag">Technology</a></p><p><img border="1" hspace="4" alt="" vspace="4" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/10/google-goog.jpg" />Kai-Fu Lee, <a href="http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/9b3a9b76-9903-11de-aa1b-00144feabdc0.html" target="_blank">head of Google's China operations</a>, resigned on Friday. This brings to a close four years of controversy, as the search engine giant censored its search results in order to pick up some market share in the largest internet market in the world (by population). </p>
<p>The change follows fresh debate within <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/google-inc/goog/nas" target="_blank">Google</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/google-inc/goog/nas" target="_blank">GOOG</a>) -- which claims to live by the motto "don't be evil" -- about whether to exit the Chinese market. The internal discussion is the result of another round of conflict with government authorities in China.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/06/google-china-loses-its-head/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Google China loses its head</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/06/google-china-loses-its-head/">Google China loses its head</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Sun, 06 Sep 2009 16:10:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/9b3a9b76-9903-11de-aa1b-00144feabdc0.html>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/06/google-china-loses-its-head/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19152695/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/06/google-china-loses-its-head/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>baidu</category><category>baidu inc</category><category>bidu</category><category>goog</category><category>google</category><category>internet</category><category>inthenews</category><category>microsoft</category><category>msft</category><category>search</category><category>search engines</category><category>sergey brin</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tom Johansmeyer]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 06 Sep 2009 16:10:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Market sells Microsoft on Q4 news -- warranted or not?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/23/market-sells-microsoft-on-q4-news-warranted-or-not/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/23/market-sells-microsoft-on-q4-news-warranted-or-not/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/23/market-sells-microsoft-on-q4-news-warranted-or-not/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/earnings-reports/" rel="tag">Earnings Reports</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/goog/" rel="tag">Google (GOOG)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/msft/" rel="tag">Microsoft (MSFT)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/yhoo/" rel="tag">Yahoo! (YHOO)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/aapl/" rel="tag">Apple Inc (AAPL)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/ibm/" rel="tag">International Business Machines (IBM)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/technology/" rel="tag">Technology</a></p><p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/04/microsoft_logo.jpg" alt="" /><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/microsoft-corporation/msft/nas">Microsoft Corporation</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/microsoft-corporation/msft/nas">MSFT</a>), a company in the same competitive league as <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/apple-inc/aapl/nas">Apple, Inc.</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/apple-inc/aapl/nas">AAPL</a>), <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/google-inc/goog/nas">Google, INc.</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/google-inc/goog/nas">GOOG</a>), <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/yahoo-inc/yhoo/nas">Yahoo!</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/yahoo-inc/yhoo/nas">YHOO</a>), and <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/international-business-machines-corporation/ibm/nys">International Business Machines Corp.</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/international-business-machines-corporation/ibm/nys">IBM</a>), posted its <a href="http://money.aol.com/rtn/pr/microsoft-reports-fourth-quarter-results/rfid234874937?channel=pf">Q4 earnings release</a> after the bell on Thursday. As I was writing this paragraph, shares of the software giant were trading down over 6% in the after-hours session. Looks like the market was disappointed.</p>
<p>To be certain, the results weren't great (of course, no one was expecting them to recall the company's growth story of yesteryear, I'm confident about that, let me tell you). Sales were down 17%. Operating income on a dollar basis dropped 30%. And, on a reported basis, Microsoft's per-share profit, calculated out to be 34 cents, declined 26%. On an adjusted basis, adding back 4 cents for a few items, earnings came in at 38 cents per share. According to my <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/22/is-microsoft-a-trade-before-its-q4-release/">earnings preview</a>, that beat estimates by two pennies. </p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/23/market-sells-microsoft-on-q4-news-warranted-or-not/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Market sells Microsoft on Q4 news -- warranted or not?</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/23/market-sells-microsoft-on-q4-news-warranted-or-not/">Market sells Microsoft on Q4 news -- warranted or not?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 23 Jul 2009 18:30:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://money.aol.com/rtn/pr/microsoft-reports-fourth-quarter-results/rfid234874937?channel=pf>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/23/market-sells-microsoft-on-q4-news-warranted-or-not/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19107955/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/23/market-sells-microsoft-on-q4-news-warranted-or-not/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>AAPL</category><category>Apple</category><category>Bing</category><category>GOOG</category><category>Google</category><category>IBM</category><category>international business machines</category><category>InternationalBusinessMachines</category><category>Microsoft</category><category>MSFT</category><category>operating system</category><category>OperatingSystem</category><category>search</category><category>software</category><category>tech stocks</category><category>TechStocks</category><category>Windows</category><category>Xbox 360</category><category>Xbox360</category><category>Yahoo</category><category>YHOO</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Steven Mallas]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2009 18:30:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Yahoo! not for me after Q2 report]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/22/yahoo-not-for-me-after-q2-report/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/22/yahoo-not-for-me-after-q2-report/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/22/yahoo-not-for-me-after-q2-report/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/earnings-reports/" rel="tag">Earnings Reports</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/internet/" rel="tag">Internet</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/msft/" rel="tag">Microsoft (MSFT)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/yhoo/" rel="tag">Yahoo! (YHOO)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/technology/" rel="tag">Technology</a></p><p><img hspace="4" border="1" align="right" vspace="4" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/06/yahoo-260a071806.jpg" /><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/yahoo-inc/yhoo/nas">Yahoo!</a>'s (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/yahoo-inc/yhoo/nas">YHOO</a>) second-quarter <a href="http://money.aol.com/rtn/pr/yahoo-reports-second-quarter-2009-results/rfid234095819?channel=pf">earnings release</a>, which was issued after the bell on Tuesday, didn't go over so well. Sales declined 13%. Adjusted earnings were 16 cents per share. That means that there was zero per-share profit growth on the bottom line. To add insult to injury, adjusted operating cash flow declined 10%. </p>
<p>In terms of expectations, <a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/rbssTechMediaTelecomNews/idUSN2126754220090721">Reuters</a> is reporting a beat of two pennies based on Yahoo!'s reported income of 10 cents per share. No one really cared. The stock sold off in yesterday's after-hours session, losing over 3% of its value. This was on top of losing 1.5% during the regular trading session. A lot of shares were traded yesterday, too. </p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/22/yahoo-not-for-me-after-q2-report/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Yahoo! not for me after Q2 report</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/22/yahoo-not-for-me-after-q2-report/">Yahoo! not for me after Q2 report</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 22 Jul 2009 08:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://money.aol.com/rtn/pr/yahoo-reports-second-quarter-2009-results/rfid234095819?channel=pf>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href=http://www.reuters.com/article/rbssTechMediaTelecomNews/idUSN2126754220090721>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/22/yahoo-not-for-me-after-q2-report/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19105872/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/22/yahoo-not-for-me-after-q2-report/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>featured</category><category>Microsoft</category><category>MSFT</category><category>online</category><category>search</category><category>tech stocks</category><category>TechStocks</category><category>web portal</category><category>WebPortal</category><category>Yahoo</category><category>YHOO</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Steven Mallas]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 22 Jul 2009 08:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Google does decent business in Q2 -- trade it now?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/17/google-does-decent-business-in-q2-trade-it-now/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/17/google-does-decent-business-in-q2-trade-it-now/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/17/google-does-decent-business-in-q2-trade-it-now/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/earnings-reports/" rel="tag">Earnings Reports</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/internet/" rel="tag">Internet</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/goog/" rel="tag">Google (GOOG)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/msft/" rel="tag">Microsoft (MSFT)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/yhoo/" rel="tag">Yahoo! (YHOO)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/technology/" rel="tag">Technology</a></p><p><img hspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/07/google.jpg" align="right" vspace="4" border="1" alt="" /><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/google-inc/goog/nas">Google</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/google-inc/goog/nas">GOOG</a>), an elite member of a tech industry that includes related companies such as <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/yahoo-inc/yhoo/nas">Yahoo!</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/yahoo-inc/yhoo/nas">YHOO</a>) and <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/microsoft-corporation/msft/nas">Microsoft</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/microsoft-corporation/msft/nas">MSFT</a>), issued its <a href="http://money.aol.com/news/articles/qp/pr/_a/google-announces-second-quarter-2009/rfid232683026">Q2 report</a> on Thursday after the bell. According to Tom Johansmeyer's <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/16/google-q2-will-be-shaped-by-demand-and-bing/">earnings preview</a>, the market was looking for Google to generate about $5.49 billion on the top line. The search giant actually delivered $5.52 billion in net sales. I think we can call that roughly in-line. The bottom line, however, definitely beat expectations. Google made $5.36 per share. Analysts believed $5.08 would be the number. </p>
<p>That's a 28-cent beat on the bottom line. Not bad, although please keep in mind that it isn't as impressive as, say, a company that was expected to do 50 cents and actually posts 60 cents. I'm sure that goes without saying. The main thing to focus on here is the fact that Google seems to be holding its own during the economic malaise. </p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/17/google-does-decent-business-in-q2-trade-it-now/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Google does decent business in Q2 -- trade it now?</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/17/google-does-decent-business-in-q2-trade-it-now/">Google does decent business in Q2 -- trade it now?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 17 Jul 2009 08:30:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/16/google-q2-will-be-shaped-by-demand-and-bing/>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href=http://money.aol.com/news/articles/qp/pr/_a/google-announces-second-quarter-2009/rfid232683026>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href=http://finance.aol.com/glossary/free%20cash%20flow>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href=http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/06/16/microsofts-bing-has-google-running-scared-yeah-right/>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href=http://www.reuters.com/article/marketsNews/idUSN1644493520090716>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/17/google-does-decent-business-in-q2-trade-it-now/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19101208/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/17/google-does-decent-business-in-q2-trade-it-now/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>GOOG</category><category>Google</category><category>inthenews</category><category>microsoft</category><category>MSFT</category><category>search</category><category>tech stocks</category><category>TechStocks</category><category>Yahoo</category><category>YHOO</category><category>YouTube</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Steven Mallas]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 17 Jul 2009 08:30:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Google Q2 will be shaped by demand ... and Bing]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/16/google-q2-will-be-shaped-by-demand-and-bing/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/16/google-q2-will-be-shaped-by-demand-and-bing/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/16/google-q2-will-be-shaped-by-demand-and-bing/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/earnings-reports/" rel="tag">Earnings Reports</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/goog/" rel="tag">Google (GOOG)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/msft/" rel="tag">Microsoft (MSFT)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/yhoo/" rel="tag">Yahoo! (YHOO)</a></p><p><img hspace="4" border="1" align="right" vspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/07/google.jpg" alt="" /><a target="_blank" href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/google-inc/goog/nas">Google</a> (NASDAQ: <a target="_blank" href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/google-inc/goog/nas">GOOG</a>) isn't invincible. The search and online ad giant is <a target="_blank" href="http://www.reuters.com/article/ousiv/idUSTRE56E5WM20090716?pageNumber=2&amp;virtualBrandChannel=0">expected to report lukewarm growth for the second quarter</a> today because of a brutal market for advertising and redoubled efforts by <a target="_blank" href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/microsoft-corporation/msft/nas">Microsoft</a> (NASDAQ: <a target="_blank" href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/microsoft-corporation/msft/nas">MSFT</a>) to own a bit more than its meager share of the online market. </p>
<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/tag/Goodnews/">Good news</a> would have to come in the form of a better mousetrap for growing Google's ad market and ways to keep the Redmond machine from tripping it up. Ultimately, analysts are looking to see how Google can get back to the double-digit growth that used to be a given.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/16/google-q2-will-be-shaped-by-demand-and-bing/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Google Q2 will be shaped by demand ... and Bing</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/16/google-q2-will-be-shaped-by-demand-and-bing/">Google Q2 will be shaped by demand ... and Bing</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 16 Jul 2009 08:30:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.reuters.com/article/ousiv/idUSTRE56E5WM20090716?pageNumber=2&amp;virtualBrandChannel=0>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/16/google-q2-will-be-shaped-by-demand-and-bing/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19099718/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/16/google-q2-will-be-shaped-by-demand-and-bing/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>bing</category><category>featured</category><category>goog</category><category>google</category><category>inthenews</category><category>microsoft</category><category>msft</category><category>search</category><category>search engine</category><category>search engines</category><category>SearchEngine</category><category>SearchEngines</category><category>yahoo</category><category>yhoo</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tom Johansmeyer]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2009 08:30:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Yahoo! is damned big and important, doesn't need Microsoft Deal]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/06/04/yahoo-is-damned-big-and-important-doesnt-need-microsoft-deal/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/06/04/yahoo-is-damned-big-and-important-doesnt-need-microsoft-deal/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/06/04/yahoo-is-damned-big-and-important-doesnt-need-microsoft-deal/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/deals/" rel="tag">Deals</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/msft/" rel="tag">Microsoft (MSFT)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/yhoo/" rel="tag">Yahoo! (YHOO)</a></p><p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/11/yhoo-yahoo!-logo.jpg" alt="" /><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/yahoo-inc/yhoo/nas" target="_blank">Yahoo Inc</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/yahoo-inc/yhoo/nas" target="_blank">YHOO</a>) claims not to be under pressure to ink a search deal with <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/microsoft-corporation/msft/nas" target="_blank">Microsoft</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/microsoft-corporation/msft/nas" target="_blank">MSFT</a>). You know what that means ...</p>
<p>The two distant followers in the search engine space were considering a partnership, but Microsoft's newly released Bing <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/tag/searchengine/">search engine</a> raises questions as to how committed Microsoft would be to a deal. Yahoo CEO Carol Bartz was quick to explain, according to <em><a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/innovationNews/idUSTRE5525NZ20090603" target="_blank">Reuters</a></em>, that "Yahoo doesn't have to do anything with Microsoft about anything" and that it is "a damned big, important site."</p>
<p>The benefits of the deal are salient, mostly involving scale and increased monetization of Yahoo's search service. The second largest search company estimates that it would save up to $700 million in a year through the Microsoft partnership. </p>
<p>Even though Yahoo is "damned big," Bartz believes that the acquisition of smaller companies that could be folded easily would be a good use of the company's cash.<br /></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/06/04/yahoo-is-damned-big-and-important-doesnt-need-microsoft-deal/">Yahoo! is damned big and important, doesn't need Microsoft Deal</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 04 Jun 2009 14:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.reuters.com/article/innovationNews/idUSTRE5525NZ20090603>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/06/04/yahoo-is-damned-big-and-important-doesnt-need-microsoft-deal/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19057432/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/06/04/yahoo-is-damned-big-and-important-doesnt-need-microsoft-deal/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>microsoft</category><category>msft</category><category>search</category><category>search engine</category><category>search engine marketing</category><category>search engines</category><category>SearchEngine</category><category>SearchEngineMarketing</category><category>SearchEngines</category><category>yahoo</category><category>yhoo</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tom Johansmeyer]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 04 Jun 2009 14:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Goldman sees Google going higher]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/06/03/goldman-sees-google-going-higher/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/06/03/goldman-sees-google-going-higher/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/06/03/goldman-sees-google-going-higher/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/analyst-reports/" rel="tag">Analyst Reports</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/good-news/" rel="tag">Good news</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/goog/" rel="tag">Google (GOOG)</a></p><p><img hspace="4" border="1" align="right" vspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/07/google.jpg" alt="" />Goldman Sachs has <a target="_blank" href="http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601110&amp;sid=aWDmeuRkQ4W8">upped its share price estimate</a> on <a target="_blank" href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/google-inc/goog/nas">Google Inc.</a> (NASDAQ: <a target="_blank" href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/google-inc/goog/nas">GOOG</a>) to $486, an increase of 17%. The analysts cite both search query growth and improvements in emerging markets coverage as the reasons for giving a nod to the dominant player in the online search business. The higher estimate implies that Google still has plenty of room to grow, which leaves plenty of upside for investors. </p>
<p>On a per-share basis, Goldman Sachs pushed its earnings forecast for the search giant 2% higher for this year - to $21.30. Per-share earnings estimates for 2010 were increased to by 8% to $23.36, and the 2011 estimate is now $27.02 (up 12%). <br /></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/06/03/goldman-sees-google-going-higher/">Goldman sees Google going higher</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 03 Jun 2009 08:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601110&amp;sid=aWDmeuRkQ4W8>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/06/03/goldman-sees-google-going-higher/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19055719/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/06/03/goldman-sees-google-going-higher/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>goldman sachs</category><category>GoldmanSachs</category><category>goog</category><category>google</category><category>gs</category><category>internet</category><category>inthenews</category><category>search</category><category>search engine</category><category>SearchEngine</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tom Johansmeyer]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 03 Jun 2009 08:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Microsoft does well with Xbox 360, but needs to try harder]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/05/29/microsoft-does-well-with-xbox-360-but-needs-to-try-harder/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/05/29/microsoft-does-well-with-xbox-360-but-needs-to-try-harder/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/05/29/microsoft-does-well-with-xbox-360-but-needs-to-try-harder/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/msft/" rel="tag">Microsoft (MSFT)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/aapl/" rel="tag">Apple Inc (AAPL)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/sne/" rel="tag">Sony Corp ADR (SNE)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/technology/" rel="tag">Technology</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/ntdoy/" rel="tag">Nintendo (NTDOY)</a></p><p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/06/xbox_360.jpg" alt="" />The news flow is abuzz this week with stats about <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/microsoft-corporation/msft/nas">Microsoft Corporation</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/microsoft-corporation/msft/nas">MSFT</a>) and its Xbox 360 console. According to <a href="http://www.informationweek.com/news/personal_tech/virtualworlds/showArticle.jhtml?articleID=217700671&amp;subSection=All+Stories">reports</a>, the company has sold 30 million units of the gaming hardware around the world. <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/nintendo-co-ltd-unsp-adr/ntdoy/nao">Nintendo Co., Ltd.</a> (OTC: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/nintendo-co-ltd-unsp-adr/ntdoy/nao">NTDOY</a>) is still in first place with 50 million Wii consoles sold. And <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/sony-corporation/sne/nys">Sony Corporation</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/sony-corporation/sne/nys">SNE</a>)? Well, the PlayStation 3 is decidedly third with roughly 22 million systems moved through retail channels. And don't give me that Xbox-360-had-a-year-over-Sony excuse. Doesn't matter. Microsoft has so far played it well. </p>
<p>But I'd like to see Microsoft do even better when it comes to the Xbox 360. I think, out of all the investments Microsoft makes that are outside of the core operating system asset, the Xbox 360 is the one with the most potential promise.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/05/29/microsoft-does-well-with-xbox-360-but-needs-to-try-harder/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Microsoft does well with Xbox 360, but needs to try harder</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/05/29/microsoft-does-well-with-xbox-360-but-needs-to-try-harder/">Microsoft does well with Xbox 360, but needs to try harder</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 29 May 2009 18:40:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.informationweek.com/news/personal_tech/virtualworlds/showArticle.jhtml?articleID=217700671&amp;subSection=All+Stories>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href=http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/05/26/microsoft-to-spend-100-million-marketing-new-search-engine/>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/05/29/microsoft-does-well-with-xbox-360-but-needs-to-try-harder/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19051800/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/05/29/microsoft-does-well-with-xbox-360-but-needs-to-try-harder/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>AAPL</category><category>Apple</category><category>Brian White</category><category>BrianWhite</category><category>iPod</category><category>microsoft</category><category>MSFT</category><category>nintendo</category><category>NTDOY</category><category>playstation 3</category><category>Playstation3</category><category>search</category><category>SNE</category><category>Sony</category><category>video games</category><category>VideoGames</category><category>Wii</category><category>Xbox 360</category><category>Xbox360</category><category>Zune</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Steven Mallas]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2009 18:40:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Baidu has excellent Q1, but is the stock too high to buy?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/04/28/baidu-has-excellent-q1-but-is-the-stock-too-high-to-buy/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/04/28/baidu-has-excellent-q1-but-is-the-stock-too-high-to-buy/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/04/28/baidu-has-excellent-q1-but-is-the-stock-too-high-to-buy/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/earnings-reports/" rel="tag">Earnings Reports</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/internet/" rel="tag">Internet</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/goog/" rel="tag">Google (GOOG)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/technology/" rel="tag">Technology</a></p><div id="imageResults" style="DISPLAY: block"><img alt="" hspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/10/baidu-bidu-logo.jpg" align="right" vspace="4" border="1" /></div>
<p><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/baidu-inc-ads/bidu/nas">Baidu</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/baidu-inc-ads/bidu/nas">BIDU</a>), a Chinese equity dedicated to internet search, has been one hot stock. As of this writing, shares of the company are up over 90% over the three-month frame! Talk about being in the green. And this is a stock that closed on Monday at $224.86. </p>
<p>Baidu reported Q1 earnings after the bell yesterday, and the <a href="http://money.aol.com/news/articles/qp/pr/_a/baidu-announces-first-quarter-2009/rfid208122355">release</a> was full of high growth rates (the growth rates should be high considering the run-up of the stock). Revenues increased over 40%, operating profit went up by over 30%, and net profit rose over 20%. On a per-share, adjusted basis, Baidu delivered 86 cents per share for its investors, beating <a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/hotStocksNews/idUSTRE53Q6RE20090427?sp=true">analysts</a>' expectations by two pennies. </p>
<p> </p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/04/28/baidu-has-excellent-q1-but-is-the-stock-too-high-to-buy/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Baidu has excellent Q1, but is the stock too high to buy?</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/04/28/baidu-has-excellent-q1-but-is-the-stock-too-high-to-buy/">Baidu has excellent Q1, but is the stock too high to buy?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 28 Apr 2009 08:30:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://money.aol.com/news/articles/qp/pr/_a/baidu-announces-first-quarter-2009/rfid208122355>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href=http://www.reuters.com/article/hotStocksNews/idUSTRE53Q6RE20090427?sp=true>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/04/28/baidu-has-excellent-q1-but-is-the-stock-too-high-to-buy/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1529803/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/04/28/baidu-has-excellent-q1-but-is-the-stock-too-high-to-buy/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Baidu</category><category>BIDU</category><category>China</category><category>featured</category><category>GOOG</category><category>Google</category><category>search</category><category>web</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Steven Mallas]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2009 08:30:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Can Yahoo!'s cursing CEO lead the company to victory? ]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/04/22/can-yahoo-s-cursing-ceo-lead-the-company-to-victory/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/04/22/can-yahoo-s-cursing-ceo-lead-the-company-to-victory/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/04/22/can-yahoo-s-cursing-ceo-lead-the-company-to-victory/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/earnings-reports/" rel="tag">Earnings Reports</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/internet/" rel="tag">Internet</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/goog/" rel="tag">Google (GOOG)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/yhoo/" rel="tag">Yahoo! (YHOO)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/twx/" rel="tag">Time Warner (TWX)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/technology/" rel="tag">Technology</a></p><p><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/yahoo-inc/yhoo/nas"><img hspace="4" border="1" align="right" vspace="4" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2009/04/yahoo1.jpg" />Yahoo!</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/yahoo-inc/yhoo/nas">YHOO</a>), a web portal whose colleagues include <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/google-inc/goog/nas">Google</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/google-inc/goog/nas">GOOG</a>) and <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/time-warner-inc-new/twx/nys">Time Warner</a>'s (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/time-warner-inc-new/twx/nys">TWX</a>) AOL, reported <a href="http://money.aol.com/news/articles/qp/pr/_a/yahoo-reports-first-quarter-2009-results/rfid206189692?channel=pf">Q1 numbers</a> after the bell on Tuesday. According to an earnings preview done by colleague <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/04/20/a-peak-at-yahoo-ahead-of-earnings/">Mark Fightmaster</a>, Wall Street was counting on something along the lines of 8 cents per share. Well, on a non-<a href="http://finance.aol.com/glossary/GAAP">GAAP</a> basis, Yahoo! earned 15 cents per share. Not bad.</p>
<p>Unfortunately, Yahoo! made three pennies more on the same adjusted basis in last year's similar quarter. Furthermore, revenues, adjusted for currency effects, dropped 8%. Oh, and one more thing. Free cash flow decreased over 60%.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/04/22/can-yahoo-s-cursing-ceo-lead-the-company-to-victory/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Can Yahoo!'s cursing CEO lead the company to victory? </em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/04/22/can-yahoo-s-cursing-ceo-lead-the-company-to-victory/">Can Yahoo!'s cursing CEO lead the company to victory? </a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 22 Apr 2009 08:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://money.aol.com/news/articles/qp/pr/_a/yahoo-reports-first-quarter-2009-results/rfid206189692?channel=pf>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/04/22/can-yahoo-s-cursing-ceo-lead-the-company-to-victory/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1524264/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/04/22/can-yahoo-s-cursing-ceo-lead-the-company-to-victory/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>AOL</category><category>carol bartz</category><category>CarolBartz</category><category>featured</category><category>GOOG</category><category>Google</category><category>Jerry Yang</category><category>JerryYang</category><category>Microsoft</category><category>MSFT</category><category>search</category><category>tech stocks</category><category>TechStocks</category><category>time warner</category><category>TimeWarner</category><category>TWX</category><category>web</category><category>Yahoo</category><category>YHOO</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Steven Mallas]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2009 08:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Google beats in Q1, but the top line was a little weak]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/04/17/google-beats-in-q1-but-the-top-line-was-a-little-weak/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/04/17/google-beats-in-q1-but-the-top-line-was-a-little-weak/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/04/17/google-beats-in-q1-but-the-top-line-was-a-little-weak/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/earnings-reports/" rel="tag">Earnings Reports</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/internet/" rel="tag">Internet</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/goog/" rel="tag">Google (GOOG)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/msft/" rel="tag">Microsoft (MSFT)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/yhoo/" rel="tag">Yahoo! (YHOO)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/twx/" rel="tag">Time Warner (TWX)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/technology/" rel="tag">Technology</a></p><p><img hspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/07/google.jpg" align="right" vspace="4" border="1" alt="" /><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/google-inc/goog/nas">Google</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/google-inc/goog/nas">GOOG</a>), the internet search engine that just about everyone uses, and a leader in its sector, one that includes <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/microsoft-corporation/msft/nas">Microsoft</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/microsoft-corporation/msft/nas">MSFT</a>), <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/yahoo-inc/yhoo/nas">Yahoo!</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/yahoo-inc/yhoo/nas">YHOO</a>), and <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/time-warner-inc-new/twx/nys">Time Warner</a>'s (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/time-warner-inc-new/twx/nys">TWX</a>) AOL, reported <a href="http://money.aol.com/news/articles/qp/pr/_a/google-announces-first-quarter-2009/rfid204730178">Q1 earnings</a> after the bell on Thursday. Google beat the analysts. </p>
<p>According to my <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/04/16/earnings-preview-how-will-google-do-in-q1/">earnings preview</a>, Wall Street was looking for $4.92 per share (some news reports indicated that $4.93 was the number to look for). Well, on an adjusted basis, Google delivered $5.16 per share. </p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/04/17/google-beats-in-q1-but-the-top-line-was-a-little-weak/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Google beats in Q1, but the top line was a little weak</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/04/17/google-beats-in-q1-but-the-top-line-was-a-little-weak/">Google beats in Q1, but the top line was a little weak</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 17 Apr 2009 07:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/04/16/earnings-preview-how-will-google-do-in-q1/>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href=http://money.aol.com/news/articles/qp/pr/_a/google-announces-first-quarter-2009/rfid204730178>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href=http://www.reuters.com/article/topNews/idUSTRE53F5SM20090416>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/04/17/google-beats-in-q1-but-the-top-line-was-a-little-weak/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1519575/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/04/17/google-beats-in-q1-but-the-top-line-was-a-little-weak/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>AOL</category><category>featured</category><category>GOOG</category><category>Google</category><category>microsoft</category><category>MSFT</category><category>search</category><category>time warner</category><category>TimeWarner</category><category>TWX</category><category>yahoo</category><category>YHOO</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Steven Mallas]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 17 Apr 2009 07:00:00 EST</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
