<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd">
<channel>
<title>BloggingStocks</title>
<link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com</link>
<description>BloggingStocks</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Baidu to Gain from Google's China Search Exit]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/03/15/baidu-to-gain-from-googles-china-seach-exit/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/03/15/baidu-to-gain-from-googles-china-seach-exit/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/03/15/baidu-to-gain-from-googles-china-seach-exit/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/major-movement/" rel="tag">Major Movement</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/international-markets/" rel="tag">International Markets</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/good-news/" rel="tag">Good news</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/goog/" rel="tag">Google (GOOG)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/china/" rel="tag">China</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/options/" rel="tag">Options</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/analysis/" rel="tag">Technical Analysis</a></p><p><a target="_blank" href="http://ir.baidu.com/phoenix.zhtml?c=188488&amp;p=irol-homeprofile"><img hspace="4" border="1" align="right" vspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2010/01/baidu-logo-240.jpg"  alt="" /></a>Baidu.com (<a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/baidu-inc-ads/bidu/nas">BIDU</a> - <a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/baidu-inc-ads/bidu/nas/option-chains">option chain</a>) shares are rising today on reports that Google (<a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/google-inc/goog/nas">GOOG</a>) <a target="_blank" href="http://money.cnn.com/2010/03/15/technology/google_china/index.htm?eref=aol">advertisers in China have been advised to switch to its rivals</a>, including Baidu and Sohu.com (<a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/sohu-com-inc/sohu/nas">SOHU</a>). This is on the heels of this weekend's report that <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/03/13/google-plans-to-shut-its-china-search-engine/">Google will shut down its Chinese search engine rather than bow to the countries strict censorship rules</a>. If you think that the stock won't fall by too much in the coming months, then now could be a good time to look at a bullish hedged trade on Baidu.<p>
BIDU opened this morning at $570.48. So far today the stock has hit a low of $563.20 and a high of $628.50. As of 12:35, BIDU is trading at $581.05 up $30.81 (5.6%). The chart for BIDU looks neutral and <a target="_blank" href="http://www.iotogo.com/spoutlookonline">S&amp;P</a> gives BIDU a neutral 3 STARS (out of 5) hold ranking.<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/03/15/baidu-to-gain-from-googles-china-seach-exit/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Baidu to Gain from Google's China Search Exit</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/03/15/baidu-to-gain-from-googles-china-seach-exit/">Baidu to Gain from Google's China Search Exit</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 15 Mar 2010 13:20:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/03/15/baidu-to-gain-from-googles-china-seach-exit/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19399580/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/03/15/baidu-to-gain-from-googles-china-seach-exit/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Baidu.com</category><category>BIDU</category><category>China</category><category>GOOG</category><category>Google</category><category>inthenews</category><category>investors observer</category><category>InvestorsObserver</category><category>options</category><category>search engine</category><category>SearchEngine</category><category>SOHU</category><category>Sohu.com</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Brent Archer]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 15 Mar 2010 13:20:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Closing Bell: Stock Market Snow Day! (ADBE, BIDU, HMC, S, MU, DF)]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/02/10/closing-bell-stock-market-snow-day-adbe-bidu-hmc-s-mu-df/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/02/10/closing-bell-stock-market-snow-day-adbe-bidu-hmc-s-mu-df/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/02/10/closing-bell-stock-market-snow-day-adbe-bidu-hmc-s-mu-df/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/tm/" rel="tag">Toyota Motor Corp. (TM)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/s/" rel="tag">Sprint Nextel Corp (S)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/adbe/" rel="tag">Adobe Systems (ADBE)</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2006/06/bell-black-white-240c050806.jpg" alt="" />Today was one of those days that held up despite the negative tape throughout much of the day and despite <a href="http://247wallst.com/2010/02/10/more-calls-for-a-crash-dia-qqqq-spy-nbg-gld/">another call for a crash</a>. Washington D.C. was closed, much of New York City was closed, and the volume was frequently light enough that this might as well just be considered a throw-away day. Or a market snow-day. <br />
<br />
Here were today's unofficial closing bell levels:<br />
<br />
Dow 10,038.16 -20.48 (-0.20%) <br />
S&amp;P 500 1,068.15 -2.37 (-0.22%) <br />
Nasdaq 2,147.18 -3.69 (-0.17%)<br />
<br />
<a href="http://vsinvestor.com/2010/02/top-day-trader-alerts-adbe-athx-bidu-cpst-dell-hmc-mcz-nbg-ntgr-s.html">Top Day Trader Stocks</a><br />
<a href="http://247wallst.com/2010/02/10/top-analyst-upgrades-and-downgrades-adbe-ainv-cpst-dell-ener-leap-mee-tif-btu-vvus-zbra/">Top Analyst Upgrades-Downgrades</a><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/02/10/closing-bell-stock-market-snow-day-adbe-bidu-hmc-s-mu-df/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Closing Bell: Stock Market Snow Day! (ADBE, BIDU, HMC, S, MU, DF)</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/02/10/closing-bell-stock-market-snow-day-adbe-bidu-hmc-s-mu-df/">Closing Bell: Stock Market Snow Day! (ADBE, BIDU, HMC, S, MU, DF)</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 10 Feb 2010 16:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/02/10/closing-bell-stock-market-snow-day-adbe-bidu-hmc-s-mu-df/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19352928/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/02/10/closing-bell-stock-market-snow-day-adbe-bidu-hmc-s-mu-df/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>airbags</category><category>automobile safety</category><category>AutomobileSafety</category><category>baidu</category><category>china</category><category>dean foods</category><category>DeanFoods</category><category>honda</category><category>micron technology</category><category>MicronTechnology</category><category>search engine</category><category>SearchEngine</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jon Ogg]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 10 Feb 2010 16:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Would anybody buy Jeeves? Ask might go on block]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/28/would-anybody-buy-jeeves-ask-might-go-on-block/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/28/would-anybody-buy-jeeves-ask-might-go-on-block/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/28/would-anybody-buy-jeeves-ask-might-go-on-block/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/deals/" rel="tag">Deals</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/rumors/" rel="tag">Rumors</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/internet/" rel="tag">Internet</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/goog/" rel="tag">Google (GOOG)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/msft/" rel="tag">Microsoft (MSFT)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/yhoo/" rel="tag">Yahoo! (YHOO)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/iaci/" rel="tag">IAC/InterActiveCorp (IACI)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/technology/" rel="tag">Technology</a></p><p><img border="1" hspace="4" alt="" vspace="4" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/02/iaci-iac-interactive-logo.jpg" />Unless you already have a major foothold in the <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/tag/searchengine/">search engine</a> market - or an amazing, disruptive technology that can make the world take notice - there isn't much point in staying. Competing with <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/google-inc/goog/nas" target="_blank">Google</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/google-inc/goog/nas" target="_blank">GOOG</a>) is hard enough, even when you're <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/yahoo-inc/yhoo/nas" target="_blank">Yahoo</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/yahoo-inc/yhoo/nas" target="_blank">YHOO</a>) or <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/microsoft-corporation/msft/nas" target="_blank">Microsoft</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/microsoft-corporation/msft/nas" target="_blank">MSFT</a>) ... and, apparently, when you're <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/iac-interactivecorp/iaci/nas" target="_blank">IAC/InterActive Corp</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/iac-interactivecorp/iaci/nas" target="_blank">IACI</a>). <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/tag/BarryDiller/">Barry Diller</a> is ready to give up Jeeves, <a href="http://www.nypost.com/p/news/business/if_you_want_to_buy_jeeves_just_ask_LzqBrdDodfWaAEylSOgPHO" target="_blank">but only if asked nicely</a>. </p>
<p>Diller's presence in the search space is <a href="http://www.ask.com" target="_blank">Ask.com</a>, ranked #4 behind Google, Yahoo and Microsoft's <a href="http://www.bing.com" target="_blank">Bing</a>. With a substantial gap between first and second, fourth barely registers at all. Ask.com has only a 2% U.S. market share, according to Hitwise, more than 60 percentage points behind the industry leader.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/28/would-anybody-buy-jeeves-ask-might-go-on-block/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Would anybody buy Jeeves? Ask might go on block</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/28/would-anybody-buy-jeeves-ask-might-go-on-block/">Would anybody buy Jeeves? Ask might go on block</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 28 Oct 2009 15:30:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.nypost.com/p/news/business/if_you_want_to_buy_jeeves_just_ask_LzqBrdDodfWaAEylSOgPHO>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/28/would-anybody-buy-jeeves-ask-might-go-on-block/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19213152/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/28/would-anybody-buy-jeeves-ask-might-go-on-block/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>barry diller</category><category>BarryDiller</category><category>bing</category><category>diller</category><category>goog</category><category>google</category><category>iaci</category><category>iacinteractive</category><category>iacinteractivecorp</category><category>inthenews</category><category>microsoft</category><category>microsoft bing</category><category>microsoft msft</category><category>MicrosoftBing</category><category>MicrosoftMsft</category><category>msft</category><category>msft microsoft</category><category>MsftMicrosoft</category><category>search</category><category>search engine</category><category>search engines</category><category>SearchEngine</category><category>SearchEngines</category><category>yahoo</category><category>yhoo</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tom Johansmeyer]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 28 Oct 2009 15:30:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Yahoo profit triples year-over-year]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/21/yahoo-profit-triples-year-over-year/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/21/yahoo-profit-triples-year-over-year/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/21/yahoo-profit-triples-year-over-year/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/earnings-reports/" rel="tag">Earnings Reports</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/good-news/" rel="tag">Good news</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/internet/" rel="tag">Internet</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/goog/" rel="tag">Google (GOOG)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/msft/" rel="tag">Microsoft (MSFT)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/yhoo/" rel="tag">Yahoo! (YHOO)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/technology/" rel="tag">Technology</a></p><p><img alt="" hspace="4" align="right" vspace="4" border="1" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/01/yhoo-yahoo!-logo.jpg" />The number two search engine in the United States turned in a fantastic third quarter, <a target="_blank" href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/20/yahoo-preview-will-stock-see-a-bid-after-q3-report/">far ahead of expectations</a>. Cost-cutting, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/tag/layoffs/">layoffs</a> and business divestitures led to a surge in <a target="_blank" href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/yahoo-inc/yhoo/nas">Yahoo</a>'s (NASDAQ: <a target="_blank" href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/yahoo-inc/yhoo/nas">YHOO</a>) profits and a <a target="_blank" href="http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&amp;sid=azVdW1WN4goY">4.8% increase in share price in extended trading on Tuesday evening</a>. Net income more than tripled to $186.1 million (13 cents per share) from the third quarter of 2008's result of $54.3 million (4 cents a share). Sales (exclusive of fees passed to partner sites) reached $1.13 billion, slightly above the $1.12 billion expected by analysts, according to a Bloomberg survey. <br />
<br />
With the advertising market in rough shape and competition from <a target="_blank" href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/google-inc/goog/nas">Google</a> (NASDAQ: <a target="_blank" href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/google-inc/goog/nas">GOOG</a>) continually rising, Yahoo refocused on its core properties: the home page, messaging and mobile services. The company trimmed what it didn't need, which is why it was able to boost its earnings even with a decline in revenue. Increased ad revenue from auto manufacturers, travel companies and consumer product manufacturers also helped.<br />
<br />
Yahoo's chief financial officer, Timothy Morse, says that the company's markets are "starting to stabilize." Of course, Yahoo itself must be doing something right: its share price is up 41% this year.</p>
<p><br />
 </p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/21/yahoo-profit-triples-year-over-year/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Yahoo profit triples year-over-year</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/21/yahoo-profit-triples-year-over-year/">Yahoo profit triples year-over-year</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 21 Oct 2009 08:30:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&amp;sid=azVdW1WN4goY>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/21/yahoo-profit-triples-year-over-year/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19203400/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/21/yahoo-profit-triples-year-over-year/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>advertising</category><category>featured</category><category>goog</category><category>google</category><category>layoffs</category><category>microsoft</category><category>msft</category><category>online ad</category><category>online ad sales</category><category>online ads</category><category>online advertising</category><category>OnlineAds</category><category>OnlineAdSales</category><category>OnlineAdvertising</category><category>search</category><category>search engine</category><category>search engines</category><category>SearchEngine</category><category>SearchEngines</category><category>yahoo</category><category>yhoo</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tom Johansmeyer]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 21 Oct 2009 08:30:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Real bargain stock #9: Google (GOOG)]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/04/real-bargain-stock-9-google-goog/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/04/real-bargain-stock-9-google-goog/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/04/real-bargain-stock-9-google-goog/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/internet/" rel="tag">Internet</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/goog/" rel="tag">Google (GOOG)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/stocks-to-buy/" rel="tag">Stocks to Buy</a></p><img hspace="4" height="200" border="0" align="right" width="150" vspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2009/10/google.gif"  alt="google" />Everyone who uses the Internet knows what a powerful tool <strong><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/google-inc/goog/nas">Google's</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/google-inc/goog/nas">GOOG</a>)</strong> search engine is. In fact, the ubiquity of Google searches has now put the company's name firmly in our verbal lexicon. Hey, you know you've made it big when your name becomes a verb, as in, "I Googled myself." <br /><br />Fortunately for shareholders, Google is more than just a catchy verb.<br /><br />Shares of the search engine firm have delivered an incredible 313% gain over the past five years, and year-to-date the shares are up a very solid 62%. I think that despite the near $500 share price, GOOG shares are still a bargain, and that means they are likely to search out some very nice gains for high-priced stock enthusiasts.<br /><br /><strong>Next: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/04/real-bargain-stock-10-berkshire-hathaway-a-shares-brk-a/">Stock #10</a></strong><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/04/real-bargain-stock-9-google-goog/">Real bargain stock #9: Google (GOOG)</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Sun, 04 Oct 2009 12:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/04/real-bargain-stock-9-google-goog/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19181186/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/04/real-bargain-stock-9-google-goog/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>goog</category><category>google</category><category>internet</category><category>jim woods</category><category>JimWoods</category><category>search engine</category><category>SearchEngine</category><category>stocks to buy</category><category>StocksToBuy</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jim Woods]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 04 Oct 2009 12:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Google's hungry, looking for a new company every month]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/24/google-s-hungry-looking-for-a-new-company-every-month/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/24/google-s-hungry-looking-for-a-new-company-every-month/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/24/google-s-hungry-looking-for-a-new-company-every-month/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/goog/" rel="tag">Google (GOOG)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/technology/" rel="tag">Technology</a></p><p><img alt="" hspace="4" align="right" vspace="4" border="1" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/07/google.jpg" />Some people join wine-of-the-month clubs. There are plenty of other programs out there, too, where your credit card is hit every month, and your purchase is sent to you directly. If only such programs were available for <a target="_blank" href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/google-inc/goog/nas">Google</a> (NASDAQ: <a target="_blank" href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/google-inc/goog/nas">GOOG</a>). . . .</p>
<p>The company's CEO, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/tag/EricSchmidt/">Eric Schmidt</a>, said Wednesday that Google plans to pick up a small company a month as a way to get its acquisition head back in the game. With the worst of the recession behind us, Google believes, this is a great way to get moving.<br />
 </p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/24/google-s-hungry-looking-for-a-new-company-every-month/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Google's hungry, looking for a new company every month</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/24/google-s-hungry-looking-for-a-new-company-every-month/">Google's hungry, looking for a new company every month</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 24 Sep 2009 09:30:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.usatoday.com/money/industries/technology/2009-09-23-google-acquisition-plans_N.htm>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/24/google-s-hungry-looking-for-a-new-company-every-month/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19172369/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/24/google-s-hungry-looking-for-a-new-company-every-month/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>acquisitions</category><category>eric schmidt</category><category>EricSchmidt</category><category>goog</category><category>google</category><category>inthenews</category><category>mergers</category><category>mergers and acquisitions</category><category>MergersAndAcquisitions</category><category>search engine</category><category>search engines</category><category>SearchEngine</category><category>SearchEngines</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tom Johansmeyer]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 24 Sep 2009 09:30:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Complex Yahoo! deal with Microsoft finally set]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/29/complex-yahoo-yhoo-deal-with-microsoft-msft-finally-set/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/29/complex-yahoo-yhoo-deal-with-microsoft-msft-finally-set/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/29/complex-yahoo-yhoo-deal-with-microsoft-msft-finally-set/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/msft/" rel="tag">Microsoft (MSFT)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/yhoo/" rel="tag">Yahoo! (YHOO)</a></p><p><img hspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/04/microsoft-yahoo.jpg" align="right" vspace="4" border="1" alt="" />After months of speculation, several media reports say that a deal to create a joint venture on search between Yahoo! (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/yahoo-inc/yhoo/nas">YHOO</a>) and Microsoft (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/microsoft-corporation/msft/nas">MSFT</a>) may be announced as early as today.</p>
<p>Details of the transaction make the much-anticipated partnership seem immensely complex, which could undermine its future. Many analysts had expected Yahoo! to get up-front cash payments for putting its search business together with Microsoft's. That will not happen. The two firms will split the revenue from ads sold on their sites. Microsoft's Bing search technology will be the platform for the venture, but Yahoo! will sell the ads.
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/29/complex-yahoo-yhoo-deal-with-microsoft-msft-finally-set/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Complex Yahoo! deal with Microsoft finally set</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/29/complex-yahoo-yhoo-deal-with-microsoft-msft-finally-set/">Complex Yahoo! deal with Microsoft finally set</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 29 Jul 2009 08:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/29/complex-yahoo-yhoo-deal-with-microsoft-msft-finally-set/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19112792/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/29/complex-yahoo-yhoo-deal-with-microsoft-msft-finally-set/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Bing</category><category>featured</category><category>GOOG</category><category>MSFT</category><category>search engine</category><category>SearchEngine</category><category>YHOO</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Douglas McIntyre]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 29 Jul 2009 08:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Google Q2 will be shaped by demand ... and Bing]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/16/google-q2-will-be-shaped-by-demand-and-bing/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/16/google-q2-will-be-shaped-by-demand-and-bing/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/16/google-q2-will-be-shaped-by-demand-and-bing/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/earnings-reports/" rel="tag">Earnings Reports</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/goog/" rel="tag">Google (GOOG)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/msft/" rel="tag">Microsoft (MSFT)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/yhoo/" rel="tag">Yahoo! (YHOO)</a></p><p><img hspace="4" border="1" align="right" vspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/07/google.jpg" alt="" /><a target="_blank" href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/google-inc/goog/nas">Google</a> (NASDAQ: <a target="_blank" href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/google-inc/goog/nas">GOOG</a>) isn't invincible. The search and online ad giant is <a target="_blank" href="http://www.reuters.com/article/ousiv/idUSTRE56E5WM20090716?pageNumber=2&amp;virtualBrandChannel=0">expected to report lukewarm growth for the second quarter</a> today because of a brutal market for advertising and redoubled efforts by <a target="_blank" href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/microsoft-corporation/msft/nas">Microsoft</a> (NASDAQ: <a target="_blank" href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/microsoft-corporation/msft/nas">MSFT</a>) to own a bit more than its meager share of the online market. </p>
<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/tag/Goodnews/">Good news</a> would have to come in the form of a better mousetrap for growing Google's ad market and ways to keep the Redmond machine from tripping it up. Ultimately, analysts are looking to see how Google can get back to the double-digit growth that used to be a given.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/16/google-q2-will-be-shaped-by-demand-and-bing/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Google Q2 will be shaped by demand ... and Bing</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/16/google-q2-will-be-shaped-by-demand-and-bing/">Google Q2 will be shaped by demand ... and Bing</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 16 Jul 2009 08:30:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.reuters.com/article/ousiv/idUSTRE56E5WM20090716?pageNumber=2&amp;virtualBrandChannel=0>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/16/google-q2-will-be-shaped-by-demand-and-bing/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19099718/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/16/google-q2-will-be-shaped-by-demand-and-bing/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>bing</category><category>featured</category><category>goog</category><category>google</category><category>inthenews</category><category>microsoft</category><category>msft</category><category>search</category><category>search engine</category><category>search engines</category><category>SearchEngine</category><category>SearchEngines</category><category>yahoo</category><category>yhoo</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tom Johansmeyer]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2009 08:30:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Yahoo! is damned big and important, doesn't need Microsoft Deal]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/06/04/yahoo-is-damned-big-and-important-doesnt-need-microsoft-deal/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/06/04/yahoo-is-damned-big-and-important-doesnt-need-microsoft-deal/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/06/04/yahoo-is-damned-big-and-important-doesnt-need-microsoft-deal/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/deals/" rel="tag">Deals</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/msft/" rel="tag">Microsoft (MSFT)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/yhoo/" rel="tag">Yahoo! (YHOO)</a></p><p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/11/yhoo-yahoo!-logo.jpg" alt="" /><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/yahoo-inc/yhoo/nas" target="_blank">Yahoo Inc</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/yahoo-inc/yhoo/nas" target="_blank">YHOO</a>) claims not to be under pressure to ink a search deal with <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/microsoft-corporation/msft/nas" target="_blank">Microsoft</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/microsoft-corporation/msft/nas" target="_blank">MSFT</a>). You know what that means ...</p>
<p>The two distant followers in the search engine space were considering a partnership, but Microsoft's newly released Bing <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/tag/searchengine/">search engine</a> raises questions as to how committed Microsoft would be to a deal. Yahoo CEO Carol Bartz was quick to explain, according to <em><a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/innovationNews/idUSTRE5525NZ20090603" target="_blank">Reuters</a></em>, that "Yahoo doesn't have to do anything with Microsoft about anything" and that it is "a damned big, important site."</p>
<p>The benefits of the deal are salient, mostly involving scale and increased monetization of Yahoo's search service. The second largest search company estimates that it would save up to $700 million in a year through the Microsoft partnership. </p>
<p>Even though Yahoo is "damned big," Bartz believes that the acquisition of smaller companies that could be folded easily would be a good use of the company's cash.<br /></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/06/04/yahoo-is-damned-big-and-important-doesnt-need-microsoft-deal/">Yahoo! is damned big and important, doesn't need Microsoft Deal</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 04 Jun 2009 14:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.reuters.com/article/innovationNews/idUSTRE5525NZ20090603>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/06/04/yahoo-is-damned-big-and-important-doesnt-need-microsoft-deal/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19057432/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/06/04/yahoo-is-damned-big-and-important-doesnt-need-microsoft-deal/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>microsoft</category><category>msft</category><category>search</category><category>search engine</category><category>search engine marketing</category><category>search engines</category><category>SearchEngine</category><category>SearchEngineMarketing</category><category>SearchEngines</category><category>yahoo</category><category>yhoo</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tom Johansmeyer]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 04 Jun 2009 14:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Goldman sees Google going higher]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/06/03/goldman-sees-google-going-higher/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/06/03/goldman-sees-google-going-higher/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/06/03/goldman-sees-google-going-higher/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/analyst-reports/" rel="tag">Analyst Reports</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/good-news/" rel="tag">Good news</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/goog/" rel="tag">Google (GOOG)</a></p><p><img hspace="4" border="1" align="right" vspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/07/google.jpg" alt="" />Goldman Sachs has <a target="_blank" href="http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601110&amp;sid=aWDmeuRkQ4W8">upped its share price estimate</a> on <a target="_blank" href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/google-inc/goog/nas">Google Inc.</a> (NASDAQ: <a target="_blank" href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/google-inc/goog/nas">GOOG</a>) to $486, an increase of 17%. The analysts cite both search query growth and improvements in emerging markets coverage as the reasons for giving a nod to the dominant player in the online search business. The higher estimate implies that Google still has plenty of room to grow, which leaves plenty of upside for investors. </p>
<p>On a per-share basis, Goldman Sachs pushed its earnings forecast for the search giant 2% higher for this year - to $21.30. Per-share earnings estimates for 2010 were increased to by 8% to $23.36, and the 2011 estimate is now $27.02 (up 12%). <br /></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/06/03/goldman-sees-google-going-higher/">Goldman sees Google going higher</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 03 Jun 2009 08:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601110&amp;sid=aWDmeuRkQ4W8>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/06/03/goldman-sees-google-going-higher/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19055719/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/06/03/goldman-sees-google-going-higher/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>goldman sachs</category><category>GoldmanSachs</category><category>goog</category><category>google</category><category>gs</category><category>internet</category><category>inthenews</category><category>search</category><category>search engine</category><category>SearchEngine</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tom Johansmeyer]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 03 Jun 2009 08:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Baidu.com started at Sell, but option players remain bullish]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/12/15/baidu-com-started-at-sell-but-option-players-remain-bullish/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/12/15/baidu-com-started-at-sell-but-option-players-remain-bullish/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/12/15/baidu-com-started-at-sell-but-option-players-remain-bullish/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/international-markets/" rel="tag">International Markets</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/analyst-reports/" rel="tag">Analyst Reports</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/china/" rel="tag">China</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/analyst-initiations/" rel="tag">Analyst Initiations</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/options/" rel="tag">Options</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/nasdaq/" rel="tag">NASDAQ</a></p><p><img hspace="4" align="right" vspace="4" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/10/baidu-bidu-logo.jpg" />Analysts at Pali Research today started coverage of <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/baidu-com-inc-ads/bidu/nas">Baidu.com, Inc.</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/baidu-com-inc-ads/bidu/nas">BIDU</a>) with a <a href="http://www.streetinsider.com/New+Coverage/Pali+Research+Slaps+Sell+Rating+On+Baidu.com+%28BIDU%29/4237884.html">Sell rating</a> and a $90 price target. The brokerage firm cited "short- to mid-term uncertainties," which it says outweigh current opportunities for the Chinese Internet-search titan.</p>
<p>Chief among those uncertainties is Baidu.com's "controversial" business model. The search engine has recently come under fire for hosting search listings paid for by unlicensed medical and pharmaceutical concerns. Last week, the company added to Wall Street's concerns by <a href="http://www.pr-inside.com/china-s-baidu-cuts-revenue-forecast-on-r965949.htm">slashing its fourth-quarter revenue outlook</a>.</p>
<p>Pali Research joins the majority of analysts with its downbeat opinion of Baidu.com. Zacks reports three Holds, one Sell, and one Strong Sell, compared to just two Buy or better ratings. While the shares have already shed 70.8% year-to-date, Pali's $90 price target suggests that the brokerage firm expects additional downside. This estimate represents a discount of 21.1% to the stock's closing price on Friday.</p>
<p>Despite BIDU's negative price action, option players remain relentlessly bullish on the shares. During the past 50 days, traders on the International Securities Exchange (ISE) and the Chicago Board Options Exchange (CBOE) have consistently purchased more calls than puts on this Internet issue.</p>
<p>With the shares up more than 1% in early trading today, the bullish case for BIDU looks curiously compelling. However, considering the company's cloudy fundamental outlook, it's unclear just how long the shares can rely on round-number support at $110 before succumbing to the effects of gravity once again.</p>
<p><em>Elizabeth Harrow is an analyst and financial writer in the research department at </em><a href="http://www.schaeffersresearch.com/"><em>Schaeffer's Investment Research</em></a><em>. She is featured in the video series </em><a href="http://www.schaeffersresearch.com/commentary/podcasts/videocenter.aspx"><em>Schaeffer's Daily Q&amp;A</em></a><em> on SchaeffersResearch.com.</em></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/12/15/baidu-com-started-at-sell-but-option-players-remain-bullish/">Baidu.com started at Sell, but option players remain bullish</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 15 Dec 2008 12:55:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/12/15/baidu-com-started-at-sell-but-option-players-remain-bullish/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1401590/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/12/15/baidu-com-started-at-sell-but-option-players-remain-bullish/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>baidu</category><category>Baidu.com</category><category>bidu</category><category>inthenews</category><category>options</category><category>pali research</category><category>PaliResearch</category><category>search engine</category><category>SearchEngine</category><category>sell rating</category><category>SellRating</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Elizabeth Harrow]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 15 Dec 2008 12:55:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Google's (GOOG) ad numbers weak again]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/03/27/googles-goog-ad-numbers-weak-again/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/03/27/googles-goog-ad-numbers-weak-again/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/03/27/googles-goog-ad-numbers-weak-again/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/goog/" rel="tag">Google (GOOG)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/marketing-and-advertising/" rel="tag">Marketing and Advertising</a></p><p><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/google-inc/goog/nas"><img alt="" hspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/03/goog-google-logo.jpg" align="right" vspace="4" border="1" />Google's</a> (<a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/google-inc/goog/nas">GOOG</a>) shares continue to be stuck below $500 where they have been since late February. Part of the reason for the fall is that comScore data showed that the number of people who clicked on ads at the big search engine was weak in January.</p>
<p>It looks like the stock will drop again as "click rates" for Google ads rose only 3% in February when compared with the figures for the same month last year. <a href="http://www.marketwatch.com/news/story/googles-paid-clicks-disappoint-again/story.aspx?guid=%7BA1B008C8%2D321F%2D4835%2DBE90%2DE2B3C2B77AC6%7D">According to</a> <em>MarketWatch: "</em>Google reported 25% growth in paid clicks in its fiscal fourth quarter ended in December. But comScore data released last month showed flat growth in Google's paid clicks in January." Now, investors can ponder another piece of bad news. </p>
<p>The easy answer to the Google data is that a recession is slowing down advertising activity everywhere. Google carries millions of ads in its AdSense program, so it would make sense that it should suffer some fallout.</p>
<p>But, the answer may be more troubling than that. Readers of Google's search pages may be discovering that the text ads next to the listings are from marketers trying to take advantage of people looking for information by clogging pages with related messages. As more people understand the system of targeting based on search results, fewer are willing to be sucked in by companies trying to reach them due to their behavior.</p>
<p>If the Google system of matching ads to search results is putting its customers off, that would be worse news than the effects of a recession.</p>
<p><em>Douglas A. McIntyre is an editor at 247wallst.com. </em></p>
<p> </p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/03/27/googles-goog-ad-numbers-weak-again/">Google's (GOOG) ad numbers weak again</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 27 Mar 2008 08:15:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.marketwatch.com/news/story/googles-paid-clicks-disappoint-again/story.aspx?guid=%7BA1B008C8%2D321F%2D4835%2DBE90%2DE2B3C2B77AC6%7D>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/03/27/googles-goog-ad-numbers-weak-again/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1150369/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/03/27/googles-goog-ad-numbers-weak-again/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>advertising</category><category>comscore</category><category>GOOG</category><category>inthenews</category><category>search</category><category>search engine</category><category>search engine market...</category><category>search engines</category><category>SearchEngine</category><category>SearchEngineMarket...</category><category>SearchEngines</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Douglas McIntyre]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 27 Mar 2008 08:15:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[China's Baidu.com doubles profit, but future guidance causes jitters]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/10/26/chinas-baidu-com-doubles-profit-but-future-guidance-causes-jit/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/10/26/chinas-baidu-com-doubles-profit-but-future-guidance-causes-jit/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/10/26/chinas-baidu-com-doubles-profit-but-future-guidance-causes-jit/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/earnings-reports/" rel="tag">Earnings Reports</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/industry/" rel="tag">Industry</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/internet/" rel="tag">Internet</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/china/" rel="tag">China</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/technology/" rel="tag">Technology</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="right" alt="Baidu (NASDAQ: BIDU) logo" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/10/baidu-bidu-logo.jpg" /><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/baidu-com-inc-ads/bidu/nas?from=lookup">Baidu.com</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/baidu-com-inc-ads/bidu/nas?from=lookup">BIDU</a>), China's largest search engine, said this week that it <a href="http://today.reuters.com/news/articlehybrid.aspx?type=comktNews&amp;rpc=33&amp;storyid=2007-10-26T113325Z_01_N25238040_RTRIDST_0_BUSINESS-BAIDU-RESULTS-DC.XML">beat profit expectations</a> by doubling its most recent quarterly profit, but shares still are trading quite a bit below where they were just a few weeks ago as the company's management warned on profit guidance moving forward, which fell a little flat compared to what analysts were expecting. Maybe analysts are expecting too much, too soon? It wouldn't be the first time for recklessly, short-mindedness palpitations from Street "experts."<br /><br />Baidu.com's shares have been on a speculative and hyped journey this year (they are priced way out of whack considering fundamentals), but reality did return to the picture a bit as of a few weeks ago when <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/10/12/does-drop-in-baidu-bidu-call-a-tech-top/">those shares came crashing down</a> in what could be seen as a needed correction. Although Baidu.com operates as the largest search provider in the world's most populous country, it's no <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/google-inc/goog/nas">Google</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/google-inc/goog/nas">GOOG</a>) when it comes to monetizing all those eyeballs -- yet.<br /><br />Baidu.com has a very enterprising future in front of it, although a large question remains on whether it can rake up those revenues like Google has managed to do in many global markets. <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/yahoo-inc/yhoo/nas">Yahoo!</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/yahoo-inc/yhoo/nas">YHOO</a>) is in a similar position: It captures billions of views every month, but lacks the advertising prowess to smartly monetize that traffic compared to industry leader Google. But an advertising explosion is still in the infant stages in China, and Baidu.com -- if it plays its cards right -- has a huge potential in front of it. But torrid, rapid growth? That may still be too much to expect in the next quarter or so.<br /><br />  <a href="http://money.aol.com/news/earnings">Visit <span style="font-weight: bold;">AOL Money &amp; Finance</span> for more earnings coverage</a><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/10/26/chinas-baidu-com-doubles-profit-but-future-guidance-causes-jit/">China's Baidu.com doubles profit, but future guidance causes jitters</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 26 Oct 2007 14:29:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://today.reuters.com/news/articlehybrid.aspx?type=comktNews&amp;rpc=33&amp;storyid=2007-10-26T113325Z_01_N25238040_RTRIDST_0_BUSINESS-BAIDU-RESULTS-DC.XML>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/10/26/chinas-baidu-com-doubles-profit-but-future-guidance-causes-jit/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1022571/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/10/26/chinas-baidu-com-doubles-profit-but-future-guidance-causes-jit/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Baidu</category><category>Baidu.com</category><category>BIDU</category><category>China</category><category>Chinese search engine</category><category>ChineseSearchEngine</category><category>Google</category><category>Internet search</category><category>InternetSearch</category><category>inthenews</category><category>search</category><category>Search engine</category><category>SearchEngine</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Brian White]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 26 Oct 2007 14:29:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Option update 10-1-07: Volatility as Apple (AAPL), Google (GOOG) and DOW rally to records]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/10/01/option-update-10-1-07-volatility-as-apple-aapl-google-goog/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/10/01/option-update-10-1-07-volatility-as-apple-aapl-google-goog/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/10/01/option-update-10-1-07-volatility-as-apple-aapl-google-goog/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/goog/" rel="tag">Google (GOOG)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/aapl/" rel="tag">Apple Inc (AAPL)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/iphone/" rel="tag">iPhone</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/options/" rel="tag">Options</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/sandp-500/" rel="tag">S and P 500</a></p><p><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/apple-inc/aapl/nas"><strong><img align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/10/flywall_final_logo_mini.gif" /></strong><strong>Apple, Inc.</strong></a><strong> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/apple-inc/aapl/nas">AAPL</a>) was recently up $3.60 cents to $157.11. </strong><br /></p>
<p><br />AAPL is expected to report earnings per share (EPS) in mid-October. AAPL October option implied volatility is at 31 and November is at 39, below its 26-week average of 42 according to Track Data, suggesting decreasing price risk. </p>
<p><strong><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/google-inc/goog/nas">Google Inc.</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/google-inc/goog/nas">GOOG</a>) was recently trading up $13.64 to $580.74. </strong><br /></p>
<p>GOOG is expected to report EPS on October 18th. GOOG October at the money 580 straddle is priced at $33.10. GOOG October option implied volatility of 31 is above its 26-week average of 27 according to Track Data, suggesting larger risk.</p>
<p><strong><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/vix/nas">Volatility Index S&amp;P 500 Options</a>:</strong></p>
<p><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/vix/nas">VIX</a> decreased as Dow Industrials got above 14,000, down .59 to 17.39. The 10-day moving average was 18.78 according to Track Data.</p>
<p><em>Daily options Update is provided by Stock Specialist Paul Foster of theflyonthewall.com.</em></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/10/01/option-update-10-1-07-volatility-as-apple-aapl-google-goog/">Option update 10-1-07: Volatility as Apple (AAPL), Google (GOOG) and DOW rally to records</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 01 Oct 2007 16:34:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/10/01/option-update-10-1-07-volatility-as-apple-aapl-google-goog/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1002598/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/10/01/option-update-10-1-07-volatility-as-apple-aapl-google-goog/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Disney</category><category>Gphone</category><category>iPhone</category><category>iPod</category><category>Mac</category><category>Nano</category><category>option implied volatility</category><category>OptionImpliedVolatility</category><category>search engine</category><category>SearchEngine</category><category>Steve Jobs</category><category>SteveJobs</category><category>youtube</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Paul Foster]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 01 Oct 2007 16:34:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Yahoo! and Microsoft make big web privacy push]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/07/23/yahoo-and-microsoft-make-big-web-privacy-push/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/07/23/yahoo-and-microsoft-make-big-web-privacy-push/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/07/23/yahoo-and-microsoft-make-big-web-privacy-push/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/industry/" rel="tag">Industry</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/consumer-experience/" rel="tag">Consumer Experience</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/goog/" rel="tag">Google (GOOG)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/msft/" rel="tag">Microsoft (MSFT)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/yhoo/" rel="tag">Yahoo! (YHOO)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/iaci/" rel="tag">IAC/InterActiveCorp (IACI)</a></p><p>Whether it matters or not <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/microsoft-corporation/msft/nas">Microsoft </a>(NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/microsoft-corporation/msft/nas">MSFT</a>), <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/yahoo-inc/yhoo/nas">Yahoo!</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/yahoo-inc/yhoo/nas">YHOO</a>), and <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/iac-interactivecorp/iaci/nas">IACI'</a>s (NASD:<a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/iac-interactivecorp/iaci/nas">IACI</a>) Ask.com are all beginning programs to keep users search data private. Yahoo! actually <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB118515232037374557.html?mod=home_whats_news_us">plans to make</a> (subscription required) all user search data anonymous within 13 months of collecting it. </p>
<p>Personal information can be used to improve the search results that are sent back to users. But, Ask and Microsoft are trying to band together with a number of companies and advocacy groups to set a coherent policy for keeping data on individual habits and data private. </p>
<p>Cynics might view the new enthusiasm for privacy two ways. The first is that it is a move by companies with a small share of the search market to pressure <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/google-inc-cl-a/goog/nas">Google</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/google-inc-cl-a/goog/nas">GOOG</a>) to improve its privacy standards. This could hurt the accuracy of the company's search service by taking away key data that allow results to be more accurate.</p>
<p>The other take on the move is that protecting privacy data is much like building "green" cars. Critics and government agencies are becoming more interested in keeping the "Big Brother" aspect of search at bay. People's habits should be private and not part of a large black box that tracks their habits to serve more targeted marketing messages or collect information on who is not paying taxes.</p>
<p>The best solution is probably for people who don't want their data collected to avoid searching altogether. Personal data makes search results better. People can't ignore that.</p>
<p><em>Douglas A. McIntyre is a partner at 24/7 Wall St.</em> </p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/07/23/yahoo-and-microsoft-make-big-web-privacy-push/">Yahoo! and Microsoft make big web privacy push</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 23 Jul 2007 07:30:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://online.wsj.com/article/SB118515232037374557.html?mod=home_whats_news_us>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/07/23/yahoo-and-microsoft-make-big-web-privacy-push/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/946784/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/07/23/yahoo-and-microsoft-make-big-web-privacy-push/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>GOOG</category><category>Google</category><category>IACI</category><category>inthenews</category><category>Microsoft</category><category>MSFT</category><category>privacy</category><category>search engine</category><category>SearchEngine</category><category>Yahoo!</category><category>YHOO</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Douglas McIntyre]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 23 Jul 2007 07:30:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Microsoft's search division has a big June]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/07/17/microsofts-search-division-has-a-big-june/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/07/17/microsofts-search-division-has-a-big-june/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/07/17/microsofts-search-division-has-a-big-june/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/other-issues/" rel="tag">Other Issues</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/internet/" rel="tag">Internet</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/competitive-strategy/" rel="tag">Competitive Strategy</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/goog/" rel="tag">Google (GOOG)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/msft/" rel="tag">Microsoft (MSFT)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/yhoo/" rel="tag">Yahoo! (YHOO)</a></p>When <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/microsoft-corporation/msft/nas">Microsoft</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/microsoft-corporation/msft/nas">MSFT</a>) unrolled its new search product, Live Search Club, I personally didn't think much of it. Microsoft has been trying to recapture market share from <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/google-inc-cl-a/goog/nas?tabs=quotesandnews">Google</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/google-inc-cl-a/goog/nas?tabs=quotesandnews">GOOG</a>) and <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/yahoo-inc/yhoo/nas?tabs=quotesandnews">Yahoo!</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/yahoo-inc/yhoo/nas?tabs=quotesandnews">YHOO</a>) for years and I thought this was just another attempt that would soon be forgotten. However, according to <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/comscore-inc/scor/nas?tabs=quotesandnews">comScore </a>(NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/comscore-inc/scor/nas?tabs=quotesandnews">SCOR</a>), I am wrong. <br /><br />Every month, comScore releases its search engine rankings for the United States. June was an interesting month for search engines according to the <a href="http://www.comscore.com/press/release.asp?press=1525">most recent release</a>. Search activity in America continues to boom - up 26% year over year and 6% month over month. Interestingly, Microsoft's sites were the only sites that gained in market share last month - quite significantly in fact.<br /><br />While Google and Yahoo lost about 1.2% in market share and the Ask network remained flat, Microsoft's sites were able to increase market share by nearly 3%. ComScore attributed much of Microsoft's gains to its Live Search Club. <br /><br />I doubt this news is enough to significantly move Microsoft's stock because the company is so gigantic and its search products produce so little revenue. I also don't think Google or Yahoo! are going to be hit because small fluctuations in market share are rather common on the internet and the companies still saw overall increases in search traffic.<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/07/17/microsofts-search-division-has-a-big-june/">Microsoft's search division has a big June</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 17 Jul 2007 07:19:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.comscore.com/press/release.asp?press=1525>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/07/17/microsofts-search-division-has-a-big-june/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/942120/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/07/17/microsofts-search-division-has-a-big-june/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>comSCore</category><category>GOOG</category><category>Google</category><category>Microsoft</category><category>MSFT</category><category>SCOR</category><category>search</category><category>search engine</category><category>SearchEngine</category><category>Yahoo</category><category>YHOO</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Kevin Kelly]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 17 Jul 2007 07:19:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Xerox gets into the search business]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/06/25/xerox-gets-into-the-search-business/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/06/25/xerox-gets-into-the-search-business/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/06/25/xerox-gets-into-the-search-business/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/launches/" rel="tag">Launches</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/competitive-strategy/" rel="tag">Competitive Strategy</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/xrx/" rel="tag">Xerox Corp (XRX)</a></p><p><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/xerox-corporation/xrx/nys">Xerox</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/xerox-corporation/xrx/nys">XRX</a>) has launched its own search technology that will comb through mounds of documents in almost any language, format or type. <a href="http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/06/24/xerox-enters-search-market/">According to</a> TechCrunch, the new tech can "take advantage of the way humans think, speak and ask questions."</p>
<p>Xerox is thinking small with deploying the technology, very small. Next year, the service will launch and be available for a fee as part of the company''s Xerox Litigation Service product.</p>
<p>Now, either the technology is not anywhere close to as good as its sounds, or Xerox is showing why its stock price has fallen from $62 in early 1999 to its current price of $19. A technology as robust as the company's new Factspotter product sounds would certainly have very broad applications outside of working through litigation documents.</p>
<p>Perhaps someone should have a talk with the Xerox people about deploying the product a little more broadly.</p>
<p><em>Douglas A. McIntyre is a partner at 24/7 Wall St.</em> </p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/06/25/xerox-gets-into-the-search-business/">Xerox gets into the search business</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 25 Jun 2007 08:15:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/06/24/xerox-enters-search-market/>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/06/25/xerox-gets-into-the-search-business/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/925686/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/06/25/xerox-gets-into-the-search-business/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>search engine</category><category>SearchEngine</category><category>Xerox</category><category>XRX</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Douglas McIntyre]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 25 Jun 2007 08:15:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Former AOL exec Jason Calacanis launches new site, Mahalo]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/06/06/former-aol-exec-calacanis-launches-new-site-mahalo/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/06/06/former-aol-exec-calacanis-launches-new-site-mahalo/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/06/06/former-aol-exec-calacanis-launches-new-site-mahalo/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/goog/" rel="tag">Google (GOOG)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/nws/" rel="tag">News Corp'B' (NWS)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/small-business/" rel="tag">Small Business</a></p><p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/06/mahalo.jpg" /><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/google-inc-cl-a/goog/nas?tabs=quotesandnews">Google</a> (NASDAQ:<a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/google-inc-cl-a/goog/nas?tabs=quotesandnews">GOOG</a>) owns the index to the world's knowledge. What it isn't good at, however, is telling us which sources are well-written, amusing, or authoritative, especially since a whole industry has evolved to help businesses game the system by pushing their links to the top of the list regardless of appropriateness.</p>
<p>What we net users need is a curator, someone to cull out the crap, spam and marketing spin, leaving only the best answers to our question. This is the role <a href="http://www.mahalo.com/Mahalo_PR">the new search site Mahalo</a>, just launched by internet entrepreneur Jason Calacanis, intends to provide.</p>
<p>Unlike sites such as Digg, which aggregate visitor opinion to vett interesting web content (and whose results are frequently gamed), <a href="http://publications.mediapost.com/index.cfm?fuseaction=Articles.san&amp;s=61445&amp;Nid=31044&amp;p=441148">Mahalo uses a staff of real human professional guides</a>. These guides take the most popular search terms du jour and compile a prioritized list of resources that best address them. </p>
<p>Obviously, indexing even a small part of all possible search terms by hand is impossible, I asked Calacanis what Mahalo's goals were in this respect. He replied, "We are setting the goal of the top 10,000 terms by the end of the year and the top 25,000 next year." He pointed out that the number of unique search terms used every day is hugely inflated because people frame the same question in so many different ways. "If you come to our iPod or flatpanel TV pages, you don't have to do the 10 secondary searches. That being said, our goal is to do the fat part of the long tail and leave the other 60-90% of the tail to Google--which is why we show Google when we don't have a hand-written page."</p>
<p><br /><br /></p>
<p> </p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/06/06/former-aol-exec-calacanis-launches-new-site-mahalo/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Former AOL exec Jason Calacanis launches new site, Mahalo</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/06/06/former-aol-exec-calacanis-launches-new-site-mahalo/">Former AOL exec Jason Calacanis launches new site, Mahalo</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 06 Jun 2007 08:39:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/06/06/former-aol-exec-calacanis-launches-new-site-mahalo/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/910888/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/06/06/former-aol-exec-calacanis-launches-new-site-mahalo/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>calacanis</category><category>goog</category><category>google</category><category>iinternet curator</category><category>IinternetCurator</category><category>mahalo</category><category>news corp</category><category>NewsCorp</category><category>nws</category><category>search engine</category><category>SearchEngine</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tom Barlow]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 06 Jun 2007 08:39:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Does Google do too well for its own good?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/04/19/does-google-do-too-well-for-its-own-good/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/04/19/does-google-do-too-well-for-its-own-good/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/04/19/does-google-do-too-well-for-its-own-good/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/earnings-reports/" rel="tag">Earnings Reports</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/forecasts/" rel="tag">Forecasts</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/industry/" rel="tag">Industry</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/goog/" rel="tag">Google (GOOG)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/yhoo/" rel="tag">Yahoo! (YHOO)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/ebay/" rel="tag">eBay (EBAY)</a></p><p>The latest weekly report from <a href="http://www.hitwise.com/">HitWise</a> shows <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/google-inc-cl-a/goog/nas">Google Inc.</a> (NASDAQ:<a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/google-inc-cl-a/goog/nas">GOOG</a>) with over 60% of the US search market. Thirty-eight of the analysts who cover Google have a <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB117694028568974829.html?mod=todays_us_money_and_investing">buy rating or better</a> on the stock. But, according to Bear Stearns, Google's hyper-growth is slowing. Search queries were up 29% in March, but a year ago, that number was 50%. </p>
<p>In the face of all this data, <em>The Wall Street Journal</em> wonders whether investors are putting their expectations for Google earnings, which are going to be released today, too high.</p>
<p>Probably not. </p>
<p>Google still has to earn its tremendous valuation. The company's shares trade at almost 14 times trailing revenue. For <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/yahoo-inc/yhoo/nas?tabs=quotesandnews">Yahoo! Inc</a>.(NASDAQ:<a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/yahoo-inc/yhoo/nas?tabs=quotesandnews">YHOO</a>), that number is less than 6x. At <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/yahoo-inc/yhoo/nas?tabs=quotesandnews">eBay Inc</a>. (NASDAQ:<a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/yahoo-inc/yhoo/nas?tabs=quotesandnews">EBAY</a>), the figure is about 8x.</p>
<p>None of this is to say that Yahoo! and eBay are not fairly valued. But Google carries a premium of almost 100% when market cap to sales is the measurement. It has to keep growing at the anticipated rate of about 70% year-over-year to keep that premium.</p>
<p>So, when Google reports earnings, expectations will be too high. But, they should be. Google has managed to beat "too high" before.</p>
<p><em>Douglas A. McIntyre is a partner at 24/7 Wall St.</em> </p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/04/19/does-google-do-too-well-for-its-own-good/">Does Google do too well for its own good?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 19 Apr 2007 08:10:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.hitwise.com/>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/04/19/does-google-do-too-well-for-its-own-good/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/877766/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/04/19/does-google-do-too-well-for-its-own-good/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>display advertising</category><category>DisplayAdvertising</category><category>ebay</category><category>goog</category><category>internet</category><category>search</category><category>search advertising</category><category>search engine</category><category>SearchAdvertising</category><category>SearchEngine</category><category>stock valuations</category><category>StockValuations</category><category>yhoo</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Douglas McIntyre]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 19 Apr 2007 08:10:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Yahoo! and Google do nicely with web reliability testing]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/04/05/yahoo-and-google-do-nicely-with-web-reliability-testing/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/04/05/yahoo-and-google-do-nicely-with-web-reliability-testing/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/04/05/yahoo-and-google-do-nicely-with-web-reliability-testing/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/products-and-services/" rel="tag">Products and Services</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/consumer-experience/" rel="tag">Consumer Experience</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/competitive-strategy/" rel="tag">Competitive Strategy</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/goog/" rel="tag">Google (GOOG)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/yhoo/" rel="tag">Yahoo! (YHOO)</a></p>2 hours and 52 minutes. What does that number represent? How about the amount of "downtime" experienced so far this year by the top three search engines (Google, Yahoo! and Microsoft Live). It's unfathomable to me how web services like Google and Yahoo! <a href="http://www.webpronews.com/topnews/2007/04/03/yahoo-google-ace-reliability-test">stay operational so much of the time</a> when the customer load and demand (think of it on a global scale) is so huge. The engineering and programming expertise to ensure as little downtime as possible is off the scale in many respects.<br /><br />Already, we're past the 2,000-hour mark into 2007, and a little less than 3 hours is the downtime mark (combined) of the top three search engines. These engines must serve a never-ending quest of customer interaction 24 hours a day from all over the world. When you think about it, the reliability of these three companies most likely beats the pants off the electricity and home telephone business -- considered to be two staples of reliability in the age of utility services.<br /><br />But what <a href="http://www.webpronews.com/topnews/2007/04/03/yahoo-google-ace-reliability-test">about the downtimes per search engine</a>? Yahoo: zero minutes. Google: seven minutes. MSN: 1 hour and 48 minutes. How does Yahoo! do it? The company still receives more traffic than Google does when the entire Yahoo! network is considered (not just web searches), and it has a perfect operational record so far. That, to me, is simply amazing. Worse up: what if Google and Yahoo! were to go down for an entire day, globally? Would we be roasting chickens in the street and fighting to the death over bottled water?<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/04/05/yahoo-and-google-do-nicely-with-web-reliability-testing/">Yahoo! and Google do nicely with web reliability testing</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 05 Apr 2007 17:59:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.webpronews.com/topnews/2007/04/03/yahoo-google-ace-reliability-test>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/04/05/yahoo-and-google-do-nicely-with-web-reliability-testing/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/867017/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/04/05/yahoo-and-google-do-nicely-with-web-reliability-testing/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>GOOG</category><category>Google</category><category>Google, Inc.</category><category>Google,Inc.</category><category>search engine</category><category>search engine uptimes</category><category>SearchEngine</category><category>SearchEngineUptimes</category><category>web service uptimes</category><category>WebServiceUptimes</category><category>Yahoo!</category><category>YHOO</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Brian White]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 05 Apr 2007 17:59:00 EST</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
