<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd">
<channel>
<title>BloggingStocks</title>
<link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com</link>
<description>BloggingStocks</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Options Update: Goldman Sachs Puts Active on SEC Charging Director for Insider Trading]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2011/03/01/options-update-goldman-sachs-puts-active-on-sec-charging-direct/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2011/03/01/options-update-goldman-sachs-puts-active-on-sec-charging-direct/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2011/03/01/options-update-goldman-sachs-puts-active-on-sec-charging-direct/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/gs/" rel="tag">Goldman Sachs Group (GS)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/pg/" rel="tag">Procter and Gamble (PG)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/spls/" rel="tag">Staples Inc (SPLS)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/options/" rel="tag">Options</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/pcg/" rel="tag">PG and E Corporation (PCG)</a></p><p><strong><a href="http://www.theflyonthewall.com"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/03/flywall_final_logo_mini.gif" alt="" /></a></strong>Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. (<a injectedlink="" class="inlinked" href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/the-goldman-sachs-group-inc/gs/nys">GS</a>) is recently down 1% due to Rajat Gupta (who served on the boards of Goldman Sachs and Procter &amp; Gamble (<a injectedlink="" class="inlinked" href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/the-procter-and-gamble-company/pg/nys">PG</a>) both), having been charged by the SEC in an insider trading scheme. </p>
<p>GS March 155 and 160 puts were active. March and July put option implied volatility of 27 is near its 26-week average of 29 according to Track Data. Large put volume suggests traders hedging for downside price movement. </p>
<p>Staples, Inc. (<a injectedlink="" class="inlinked" href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/staples-inc/spls/nas">SPLS</a>) March call option implied volatility is at 37, June is at 29 according to Track Data, compared to its 26-week average of 28, suggesting larger near-term movement into Q4 results on March 2.</p>
<p><em>Options Update is by Stock Specialist Paul Foster of theflyonthewall.com</em>.</p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2011/03/01/options-update-goldman-sachs-puts-active-on-sec-charging-direct/">Options Update: Goldman Sachs Puts Active on SEC Charging Director for Insider Trading</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 01 Mar 2011 17:30:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2011/03/01/options-update-goldman-sachs-puts-active-on-sec-charging-direct/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19864078/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2011/03/01/options-update-goldman-sachs-puts-active-on-sec-charging-direct/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>goldman sachs</category><category>GS</category><category>inthenews</category><category>options</category><category>PG</category><category>sec</category><category>staples</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Paul Foster]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 01 Mar 2011 17:30:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Fifth Third Bancorp Subpoenaed by SEC]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2011/03/01/fifth-third-bancorp-subpoenaed-by-sec/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2011/03/01/fifth-third-bancorp-subpoenaed-by-sec/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2011/03/01/fifth-third-bancorp-subpoenaed-by-sec/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/major-movement/" rel="tag">Major Movement</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/sec-filings/" rel="tag">SEC Filings</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/bad-news/" rel="tag">Bad News</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/options/" rel="tag">Options</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/analysis/" rel="tag">Technical Analysis</a></p><p><a target="_blank" href="http://phx.corporate-ir.net/phoenix.zhtml?c=72735&amp;p=irol-IRHome"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="right" alt="FITB logo" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2011/03/fitb-fifth-third-logo.jpg" /></a>Fifth Third Bancorp (<a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/fifth-third-bancorp/fitb/nas">FITB</a> - <a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/fifth-third-bancorp/fitb/nas/option-chains">option chain</a>) stock is trading lower today after the company disclosed in a regulatory filing that it has been <a href="http://blogs.barrons.com/stockstowatchtoday/2011/03/01/sec-subpoenas-information-on-fifth-thirds-commercial-loans/">subpoenaed by the Securities and Exchange Commission</a> regarding commercial-loan practices. If you think this stock won't be rising too far in the coming months, then it could be a good time to look at a bearish hedged play on FITB.<br />
<br />
This morning, FITB opened at $13.97. So far today the stock has hit a high of $14.15 and a low of $13.67. As of 11:50, FITB is trading at $14.02, down $0.58 (-4.0%). The chart for FITB looks bullish and <a target="_blank" href="http://www.iotogo.com/spoutlookonline">S&amp;P</a> gives FITB a positive 4 STARS (out of 5) buy ranking.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2011/03/01/fifth-third-bancorp-subpoenaed-by-sec/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Fifth Third Bancorp Subpoenaed by SEC</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2011/03/01/fifth-third-bancorp-subpoenaed-by-sec/">Fifth Third Bancorp Subpoenaed by SEC</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 01 Mar 2011 13:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2011/03/01/fifth-third-bancorp-subpoenaed-by-sec/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19863470/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2011/03/01/fifth-third-bancorp-subpoenaed-by-sec/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Fifth Third Bancorp</category><category>FITB</category><category>inthenews</category><category>Investors Observer</category><category>options</category><category>SEC</category><category>subpoena</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Brent Archer]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 01 Mar 2011 13:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Microsoft's Ballmer Sells $1.34 Billion of Microsoft Stock]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/11/06/ballmer-sells-microsoft-stock/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/11/06/ballmer-sells-microsoft-stock/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/11/06/ballmer-sells-microsoft-stock/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/sec-filings/" rel="tag">SEC Filings</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/management/" rel="tag">Management</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/insiders/" rel="tag">Insiders</a></p><p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.dailyfinance.com/media/2010/10/ballmerphone.jpg" alt="Steve Ballmer" />Microsoft (<a class="inlinked" href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/microsoft-corporation/msft/nas">MSFT</a>) CEO Steve Ballmer sold about 50 million shares of his Microsoft stock for $1.34 billion, as reported in the <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748704353504575597102844299096.html?mod=WSJ_hp_LEFTWhatsNewsCollection"><em>Wall Street Journal</em></a> (subscription required).</p>
<p>Let's listen to a fictitious exchange between Steve and his tax accountant: "Steve, you know you hold 408 million shares of Microsoft. For the end of the year tax adjustments, it's a good idea to sell some of it, say 50 million. Microsoft's earnings are strong. The mutual and hedge guys most likely will be buying. We can sell into that strength."</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/11/06/ballmer-sells-microsoft-stock/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Microsoft's Ballmer Sells $1.34 Billion of Microsoft Stock</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/11/06/ballmer-sells-microsoft-stock/">Microsoft's Ballmer Sells $1.34 Billion of Microsoft Stock</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Sat, 06 Nov 2010 12:40:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/11/06/ballmer-sells-microsoft-stock/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19705840/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/11/06/ballmer-sells-microsoft-stock/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>featured</category><category>insider sales</category><category>inthenews</category><category>Microsoft</category><category>MSFT</category><category>SEC</category><category>Steve Ballmer</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Connie Madon]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 06 Nov 2010 12:40:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Flash Crash Report: What Really Happened?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/10/02/flash-crash-report-what-really-happened/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/10/02/flash-crash-report-what-really-happened/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/10/02/flash-crash-report-what-really-happened/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/indices/" rel="tag">Indices</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/marketmatters/" rel="tag">Market Matters</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/sandp-500/" rel="tag">S and P 500</a></p><p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.dailyfinance.com/media/2010/05/downicemay7240.jpg" alt="May 6 flash crash" />After nearly five months, federal regulators have been able to dissect the events of May 6, the day when the Dow plunged almost 1,000 points.</p>
<p>A joint report issued by the Commodity Futures Trading Commission and the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) pieced together that day's events and came up with this finding, as reported in the <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748703859204575525973854203534.html?mod=WSJ_hpp_LEFTTopStories"><em>Wall Street Journal</em></a>. A computerized trading program run by a Waddell &amp; Reed trader automatically sold 35,000 e-mini S&amp;P contracts. These contracts mirror the larger S&amp;P contracts. The trader's program was triggered at 9% of the trade volume.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/10/02/flash-crash-report-what-really-happened/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Flash Crash Report: What Really Happened?</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/10/02/flash-crash-report-what-really-happened/">Flash Crash Report: What Really Happened?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Sat, 02 Oct 2010 09:40:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748703859204575525973854203534.html?mod=WSJ_hpp_LEFTTopStories>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/10/02/flash-crash-report-what-really-happened/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19657944/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/10/02/flash-crash-report-what-really-happened/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Commodity Futures Trading Commission</category><category>electronic trading</category><category>featured</category><category>flash crash report</category><category>inthenews</category><category>May 6</category><category>SEC</category><category>Securities and Exchange Commission</category><category>Waddell Reed</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Connie Madon]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 02 Oct 2010 09:40:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Green Mountain Coffee's SEC Woes Inspire a Bearish Strangle]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/09/29/green-mountain-coffees-sec-woes-inspire-a-bearish-strangle/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/09/29/green-mountain-coffees-sec-woes-inspire-a-bearish-strangle/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/09/29/green-mountain-coffees-sec-woes-inspire-a-bearish-strangle/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/major-movement/" rel="tag">Major Movement</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/bad-news/" rel="tag">Bad News</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/options/" rel="tag">Options</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" alt="Green Mountain Coffee Roasters logo" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2010/08/greenmountainlogo.jpg" />Option volume has skyrocketed on Green Mountain Coffee Roasters (<a class="inlinked" href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/green-mountain-coffee-roasters-inc/gmcr/nas">GMCR</a>) today, after the Vermont-based coffee company announced that the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has <a href="http://www.marketwatch.com/story/green-mountain-coffee-shares-fall-17-on-sec-probe-2010-09-29">taken an interest</a> in GMCR's revenue recognition practices. <br />
<br />
GMCR plunged right out of the gate as traders reacted to the news, with the shares shedding roughly 17% to test round-number support at $30. Option players definitely took notice; within the first two hours of the session, roughly 42,000 calls and 34,000 puts had changed hands on the stock -- outpacing GMCR's predicted daily volume by a massive margin. <br />
<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/09/29/green-mountain-coffees-sec-woes-inspire-a-bearish-strangle/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Green Mountain Coffee's SEC Woes Inspire a Bearish Strangle</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/09/29/green-mountain-coffees-sec-woes-inspire-a-bearish-strangle/">Green Mountain Coffee's SEC Woes Inspire a Bearish Strangle</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 29 Sep 2010 14:30:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/09/29/green-mountain-coffees-sec-woes-inspire-a-bearish-strangle/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19653648/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/09/29/green-mountain-coffees-sec-woes-inspire-a-bearish-strangle/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>calls</category><category>GMCR</category><category>Green Mountain Coffee Roasters</category><category>inthenews</category><category>options</category><category>puts</category><category>SEC</category><category>Securities and Exchange Commission</category><category>strangle</category><category>volatility</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Elizabeth Harrow]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 29 Sep 2010 14:30:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Can Regulators Fix the Market?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/09/14/can-regulators-fix-the-market/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/09/14/can-regulators-fix-the-market/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/09/14/can-regulators-fix-the-market/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/marketmatters/" rel="tag">Market Matters</a></p><img hspace="4" align="right" vspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2010/05/bha0016.jpg"  alt="" />According to a new poll conducted by <a href="http://www.cnbc.com/id/39154764">CNBC/Associated Press</a>, 86% of the 1035 respondents view the market as unfair to small investors following the May 6 Flash Crash, CNBC reported. <br />
<br />
On May 6, the market crashed almost 1000 points in a matter of minutes. Some stocks traded near zero. The cause has yet to be determined. This event took investors by surprise and regulators were blindsided. <br />
<br />
With regulators unsure of the cause of the crash and ways to prevent another one, investors have lost faith in regulators' ability to fix the market.<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/09/14/can-regulators-fix-the-market/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Can Regulators Fix the Market?</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/09/14/can-regulators-fix-the-market/">Can Regulators Fix the Market?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 14 Sep 2010 11:30:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.cnbc.com/id/39154764>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/09/14/can-regulators-fix-the-market/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19632702/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/09/14/can-regulators-fix-the-market/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>inthenews</category><category>regulation</category><category>sec</category><category>securities and exchange commission</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Connie Madon]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 14 Sep 2010 11:30:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[More Stocks Are Covered by Circuit-Breaker Rule]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/09/11/more-stocks-covered-by-circuit-breaker-rule/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/09/11/more-stocks-covered-by-circuit-breaker-rule/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/09/11/more-stocks-covered-by-circuit-breaker-rule/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/marketmatters/" rel="tag">Market Matters</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/sandp-500/" rel="tag">S and P 500</a></p><p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/10/nyse-floor.jpg" />On May 6, we saw the Dow plunge almost 1,000 points in a matter of minutes. To date, no one has pinpointed the cause of the crash.</p>
<p>Meanwhile the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has been scrambling to plug the leak in the dike. An article in <a href="http://www.usatoday.com/money/markets/2010-09-10-russell-circuit-breakers_N.htm"><em>USA Today</em></a> outlines the expanded SEC rules.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/09/11/more-stocks-covered-by-circuit-breaker-rule/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>More Stocks Are Covered by Circuit-Breaker Rule</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/09/11/more-stocks-covered-by-circuit-breaker-rule/">More Stocks Are Covered by Circuit-Breaker Rule</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Sat, 11 Sep 2010 12:40:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/09/11/more-stocks-covered-by-circuit-breaker-rule/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19629680/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/09/11/more-stocks-covered-by-circuit-breaker-rule/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>circuit breaker</category><category>electronic trading</category><category>featured</category><category>flash crash</category><category>inthenews</category><category>Russel 1000</category><category>S and P 500</category><category>SEC</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Connie Madon]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 11 Sep 2010 12:40:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[SEC's Schapiro Hints at 'Flash Crash' Reforms]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/09/07/secs-schapiro-hints-at-flash-crash-reforms/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/09/07/secs-schapiro-hints-at-flash-crash-reforms/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/09/07/secs-schapiro-hints-at-flash-crash-reforms/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/politics/" rel="tag">Politics</a></p><p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" alt="SEC seal"  src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2010/08/sec-seal.jpg" />With sophisticated high-frequency trading and quant funds, it seems that the proverbial Hal 9000 has taken over Wall Street. Of course, a stark example of this was in May 6, in which the market inexplicably lost $862 billion in market value within 20 minutes. It was the "Flash Crash."</p>
<p>Since then, the SEC and other government regulators have been investigating the matter. Already, there are some changes that have been put in place, such as circuit breakers. And yes, these have been triggered in some cases already.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/09/07/secs-schapiro-hints-at-flash-crash-reforms/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>SEC's Schapiro Hints at 'Flash Crash' Reforms</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/09/07/secs-schapiro-hints-at-flash-crash-reforms/">SEC's Schapiro Hints at 'Flash Crash' Reforms</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 07 Sep 2010 16:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/09/07/secs-schapiro-hints-at-flash-crash-reforms/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19623923/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/09/07/secs-schapiro-hints-at-flash-crash-reforms/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Flash crash</category><category>inthenews</category><category>Mary SCapiro</category><category>SEC</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tom Taulli]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 07 Sep 2010 16:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[SEC, Asleep During the Financial Meltdown, Vows to Get Tough]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/08/27/sec-asleep-during-the-financial-meltdown-vows-to-get-tough/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/08/27/sec-asleep-during-the-financial-meltdown-vows-to-get-tough/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/08/27/sec-asleep-during-the-financial-meltdown-vows-to-get-tough/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/insiders/" rel="tag">Insiders</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/law/" rel="tag">Law</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/employees/" rel="tag">Employees</a></p><p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2010/08/sec-seal.jpg" alt="SEC" />The Securities and Exchange Commission pretty much fell asleep for the past two years. Now, there's talk that <a href="http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/7d6da03e-b13f-11df-b899-00144feabdc0.html">the agency plans to get tough on violators</a> whose greed and recklessness took this country to its knees. The Federal Reserve had to pledge or spend $12.8 trillion to bail them out.</p>
<p>The $12.8 trillion is gone and we have a country with 17 million unemployed and underemployed. Fed Chairman Ben Bernanke could have done much better just taking that $12.8 trillion and help those in need. All he had to do was use one good bank for Americans to switch their money into, and let the greedy ones take a hit. With $12.8 trillion Bernanke could have put this country back on its feet again.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/08/27/sec-asleep-during-the-financial-meltdown-vows-to-get-tough/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>SEC, Asleep During the Financial Meltdown, Vows to Get Tough</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/08/27/sec-asleep-during-the-financial-meltdown-vows-to-get-tough/">SEC, Asleep During the Financial Meltdown, Vows to Get Tough</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 27 Aug 2010 11:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/7d6da03e-b13f-11df-b899-00144feabdc0.html>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/08/27/sec-asleep-during-the-financial-meltdown-vows-to-get-tough/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19610361/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/08/27/sec-asleep-during-the-financial-meltdown-vows-to-get-tough/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>bernanke</category><category>featured</category><category>financial crisis</category><category>insider trading</category><category>inthenews</category><category>sec</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Connie Madon]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 27 Aug 2010 11:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Whistleblowing Provision in Financial Reform Act Could Mean Big Payouts]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/08/09/whistleblowing-provision-in-the-financial-reform-act-could-mean/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/08/09/whistleblowing-provision-in-the-financial-reform-act-could-mean/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/08/09/whistleblowing-provision-in-the-financial-reform-act-could-mean/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/employees/" rel="tag">Employees</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/scandals/" rel="tag">Scandals</a></p><img hspace="4" vspace="4" border="1" align="right" alt="whistleblowers" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2010/01/seclogo.jpg" />Are you a whistleblower? If so, you could receive <a href="http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/efa8a32a-a31a-11df-8cf4-00144feabdc0.html">big payouts</a> from the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC).<br />
<br />
The new financial reform act has a provision that rewards whistleblowers, senior employees and third-party informants who provide the SEC with information that results in prosecution. The payouts could be huge. People who provide the SEC with information that leads to a successful enforcement are entitled to receive 10% to 30% of any sanction over $1 million -- including a share of the proceeds from any related regulatory action or shareholders' lawsuit.<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/08/09/whistleblowing-provision-in-the-financial-reform-act-could-mean/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Whistleblowing Provision in Financial Reform Act Could Mean Big Payouts</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/08/09/whistleblowing-provision-in-the-financial-reform-act-could-mean/">Whistleblowing Provision in Financial Reform Act Could Mean Big Payouts</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 09 Aug 2010 09:30:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/efa8a32a-a31a-11df-8cf4-00144feabdc0.html>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/08/09/whistleblowing-provision-in-the-financial-reform-act-could-mean/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19585550/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/08/09/whistleblowing-provision-in-the-financial-reform-act-could-mean/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>dodd-frank wall street reform</category><category>financial reform</category><category>financial reform bill</category><category>inthenews</category><category>SEC</category><category>whistleblower</category><category>whistleblowers</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Connie Madon]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 09 Aug 2010 09:30:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Closing Bell: Taking Back the Bernanke Loss from Yesterday (WFC, GDOT, USO, GS, ACF, DELL)]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/07/22/closing-bell-taking-back-the-bernanke-loss-from-yesterday-wfc/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/07/22/closing-bell-taking-back-the-bernanke-loss-from-yesterday-wfc/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/07/22/closing-bell-taking-back-the-bernanke-loss-from-yesterday-wfc/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/dell/" rel="tag">Dell (DELL)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/gs/" rel="tag">Goldman Sachs Group (GS)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/wfc/" rel="tag">Wells Fargo (WFC)</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/08/bell-green.jpg" />A rise in jobless claims was trumped by a housing number that was not so bad. There was also a rise in oil prices after NOAA released the path of <a href="http://247wallst.com/2010/07/22/bp-clean-up-now-faces-tropical-depression-three-bp/">Tropical Depression Three</a>, revealing that it could be a threat to the Gulf of Mexico oil infrastructure. Regardless of the market move, this was another light-volume trading day. Ben Bernanke's testimony acted as a wash between yesterday and today because his lack of growth stance yesterday was negated today with more certain comments about new tools for the FOMC to use to counter a slowdown. <br />
<br />
Here were today's unofficial closing bell levels:<br />
<br />
Dow 10,345.76 +225.23 (2.23%) <br />
S&amp;P 500 1,093.66 +24.07 (2.25%) <br />
Nasdaq 2,245.89 +58.56 (2.68%)<br />
<br />
<a href="http://247wallst.com/2010/07/22/top-analyst-upgrades-downgrades-cern-cnqr-rdy-etn-gca-hgsi-lltc-oi-pom-swi-wfc-xlnx/">Top Analyst Calls</a><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/07/22/closing-bell-taking-back-the-bernanke-loss-from-yesterday-wfc/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Closing Bell: Taking Back the Bernanke Loss from Yesterday (WFC, GDOT, USO, GS, ACF, DELL)</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/07/22/closing-bell-taking-back-the-bernanke-loss-from-yesterday-wfc/">Closing Bell: Taking Back the Bernanke Loss from Yesterday (WFC, GDOT, USO, GS, ACF, DELL)</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 22 Jul 2010 16:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/07/22/closing-bell-taking-back-the-bernanke-loss-from-yesterday-wfc/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19565142/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/07/22/closing-bell-taking-back-the-bernanke-loss-from-yesterday-wfc/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>ACF</category><category>DELL</category><category>GS</category><category>gulf</category><category>oil</category><category>sec</category><category>tropical depression</category><category>USO</category><category>WFC</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jon Ogg]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 22 Jul 2010 16:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Goldman Settles with the SEC for $550 Million]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/07/16/goldman-sec/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/07/16/goldman-sec/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/07/16/goldman-sec/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/gs/" rel="tag">Goldman Sachs Group (GS)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/politics/" rel="tag">Politics</a></p><p><img hspace="4" vspace="4" border="1" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2010/02/goldman-sachs-logo-240.jpg" />If you are familiar with Securities and Exchange Commission cases, you will recognize this boilerplate settlement. By "boilerplate" I mean that Goldman Sachs <a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/the-goldman-sachs-group-inc/gs/nys">(GS)</a> is fined, but neither admits nor denies any of the charges.<br />
<br />
<a href="http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/4bd43894-904c-11df-ad26-00144feab49a.html">Goldman settled for a measly $550 million</a>. This amounts to about a week's worth of trading. Goldman further got regulators to drop all fraud charges and settle for a lower charge, which said the marketing material for collateralized debt obligations(CDOs) "contained incomplete information."</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/07/16/goldman-sec/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Goldman Settles with the SEC for $550 Million</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/07/16/goldman-sec/">Goldman Settles with the SEC for $550 Million</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 16 Jul 2010 10:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/4bd43894-904c-11df-ad26-00144feab49a.html>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/07/16/goldman-sec/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19556513/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/07/16/goldman-sec/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>goldman settlement</category><category>inthenews</category><category>sec</category><category>Securities and Exchange Commission</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Connie Madon]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 16 Jul 2010 10:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[JockStocks: RIP Big 12]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/06/11/college-football-conference-changes/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/06/11/college-football-conference-changes/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/06/11/college-football-conference-changes/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/rumors/" rel="tag">Rumors</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/nke/" rel="tag">NIKE, Inc'B' (NKE)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/ua/" rel="tag">Under Armour'A' (UA)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/business-of-sports/" rel="tag">Business of Sports</a></p><p><img border="1" hspace="4" alt="PAC 10" vspace="4" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2010/06/pac10.jpg" />The exodus is set to begin. Rumors have pegged today as the day that Colorado is going to leave the Big 12 athletic conference for the "greener pastures" of the PAC-10.</p>
<p>This move will be the first in what will become the end of one of NCAA Football's most storied and most profitable athletic conferences. The Big 12 was one of the leaders of the NCAA Football world, but it is set to become nothing more than a carcass, left to be picked over by the major predators of the football world (most notably the PAC-10, SEC, and the Big Ten). <br />
 </p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/06/11/college-football-conference-changes/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>JockStocks: RIP Big 12</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/06/11/college-football-conference-changes/">JockStocks: RIP Big 12</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 11 Jun 2010 12:30:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/06/11/college-football-conference-changes/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19512464/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/06/11/college-football-conference-changes/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Big 10</category><category>Big 12</category><category>Big 12 Football</category><category>college football</category><category>Nike</category><category>NKE</category><category>Notre Dame</category><category>PAC 10</category><category>SEC</category><category>Under Armour</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark Fightmaster]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 11 Jun 2010 12:30:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[SEC Levels Charges in $40 Million Ponzi Scheme]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/06/03/sec-levels-charges-in-40-million-ponzi-scheme/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/06/03/sec-levels-charges-in-40-million-ponzi-scheme/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/06/03/sec-levels-charges-in-40-million-ponzi-scheme/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/bad-news/" rel="tag">Bad News</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/press-releases/" rel="tag">Press Releases</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/scandals/" rel="tag">Scandals</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/headline-news/" rel="tag">Headline News</a></p><img hspace="4" border="1" align="right" vspace="4" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2010/04/bank.earnings.stacks-of-dollars.getty2.jpg" />Yesterday, SEC officials charged a Miami man for his operation of a $40 million Ponzi scheme. It is alleged that Luis Felipe Perez had fraudulently convinced investors to invest with him to fund his jewelry business and to finance pawn shops in New York. The jewelry businesses of the accused, Lucky Star Diamonds Inc. and Luis Felipe Jewelry Design Corp., have turned out to be no more than sham facades, and both companies were completely void of employees. Both companies have subsequently ceased their -paper only- operations. Likewise, Mr. Perez's pawn shop connections have turned out to be non-existent.<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/06/03/sec-levels-charges-in-40-million-ponzi-scheme/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>SEC Levels Charges in $40 Million Ponzi Scheme</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/06/03/sec-levels-charges-in-40-million-ponzi-scheme/">SEC Levels Charges in $40 Million Ponzi Scheme</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 03 Jun 2010 14:40:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.sec.gov/news/press/2010/2010-95.htm>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/06/03/sec-levels-charges-in-40-million-ponzi-scheme/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19501404/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/06/03/sec-levels-charges-in-40-million-ponzi-scheme/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>inthenews</category><category>Lucky Star Diamonds Inc.</category><category>Luis Felipe Jewelry Design Corp.</category><category>Luis Felipe Perez</category><category>Ponzi Scheme</category><category>SEC</category><category>Securities and Exchange Commission</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Gary Sattler]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 03 Jun 2010 14:40:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Get Ready for Goldman Sachs to Bounce!]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/05/22/goldman-sachs-sec-settlement/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/05/22/goldman-sachs-sec-settlement/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/05/22/goldman-sachs-sec-settlement/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/rumors/" rel="tag">Rumors</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/scandals/" rel="tag">Scandals</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/gs/" rel="tag">Goldman Sachs Group (GS)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/stock-picks/" rel="tag">Stock Picks</a></p><p><img hspace="4" border="1" align="right" vspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2010/02/goldman-sachs-logo-240.jpg" alt="Goldman Sachs GS logo" />For weeks, Goldman Sachs has been swinging in the wind as the SEC charges were made, Senate hearings (chest pounding) were conducted and it was announced that the DOJ was investigating Goldman and the rest of the Wall Street banking club.</p>
<p>This week, I posted <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/05/20/goldman-sachs-how-low-will-it-go/" title="View How Much Further Can Goldman Sachs Drop? on BloggingStocks" target="_blank">How Much Further Can Goldman Sachs Drop?</a> at the behest of one of our editors. Today, amid the rumors that settlement talks are under way between Goldman Sachs and the SEC, I am wondering how much the stock will bounce when rumors become reality? I would bet a lot. I have bet a lot.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/05/22/goldman-sachs-sec-settlement/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Get Ready for Goldman Sachs to Bounce!</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/05/22/goldman-sachs-sec-settlement/">Get Ready for Goldman Sachs to Bounce!</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Sat, 22 May 2010 14:40:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/05/22/goldman-sachs-sec-settlement/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19487343/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/05/22/goldman-sachs-sec-settlement/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>DOJ</category><category>featured</category><category>Goldman Sachs</category><category>Goldman Sachs fraud</category><category>GS</category><category>SEC</category><category>SEC fines</category><category>Sheldon Liber</category><category>Wall Street Greed</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Sheldon Liber]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 22 May 2010 14:40:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Proposed Trading Curbs Are Inadequate for 21st Century Trading]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/05/19/sec proposed-trading-curbs/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/05/19/sec proposed-trading-curbs/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/05/19/sec proposed-trading-curbs/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/marketmatters/" rel="tag">Market Matters</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/sandp-500/" rel="tag">S and P 500</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/djia/" rel="tag">DJIA</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/financial-crisis/" rel="tag">Financial Crisis</a></p><p><img hspace="4" border="1" align="right" vspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2009/12/wallstreepicture-240.jpg"  alt="electronic tading" />The Securities and Exchange Commission is planning to institute <a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/idUSTRE64H3SV20100518">trading curbs on major exchanges</a> and individual stocks starting in mid June. The proposal is for "circuit breakers" to kick in when the market drops 5% between the hours of 9:45 a.m. and 3:35 p.m.</p>
<p>Why are these proposals inadequate? First, Gary Gensler of the Commodity Futures Trading Commission testified that it was the sale of 75,000 e-mini S&amp;P contracts by <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/05/15/waddell-stock-market-plunge/">Waddell and Reed</a> that started the sell off. This kicked off high-speed computers by big banks and traders all over the country. Within 20 minutes, the trading in just this one contract swelled to over 840,000 contracts, plunging the Dow down 998 points, or nearly $1 trillion dollars.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/05/19/sec proposed-trading-curbs/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Proposed Trading Curbs Are Inadequate for 21st Century Trading</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/05/19/sec proposed-trading-curbs/">Proposed Trading Curbs Are Inadequate for 21st Century Trading</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 19 May 2010 12:30:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.reuters.com/article/idUSTRE64H3SV20100518>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/05/19/sec proposed-trading-curbs/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19482292/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/05/19/sec proposed-trading-curbs/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Gary Gensler</category><category>SEC</category><category>trading curbs</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Connie Madon]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 19 May 2010 12:30:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Congress, SEC and Goldman Sachs Failures -- Part 2]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/05/12/congress-sec-and-goldman-sachs-failures-part-2/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/05/12/congress-sec-and-goldman-sachs-failures-part-2/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/05/12/congress-sec-and-goldman-sachs-failures-part-2/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/other-issues/" rel="tag">Other Issues</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/rants-and-raves/" rel="tag">Rants and Raves</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/scandals/" rel="tag">Scandals</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/gs/" rel="tag">Goldman Sachs Group (GS)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/headline-news/" rel="tag">Headline News</a></p><font><img hspace="4" vspace="4" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2010/02/goldman-sachs-logo-240.jpg" alt="Goldman Sachs GS logo" /></font>Continuing from where I left off earlier today regarding <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/05/11/congress-sec-and-goldman-sachs-failures-part-1/">the Goldman Sachs - Paulson &amp; Company debacle...</a><br />
<br />
What would have happened if the collateralized debt obligations were created and sold exactly as was done, shorted by Paulson, and the eventual buyer was Warren Buffett? <br />
<br />
First of all, <em>"my pal Warren" </em>would not let his position be known to anyone beyond normal filing requirements and perhaps announced at some later date. Second, if it was disclosed that Buffett was betting against Paulson, Mr Paulson would be a huge fool if he did not think twice about his shorting the CDO given this new piece of information. Third, should the buyers of the actual CDO be treated differently than Buffett, or you or me? Of course not.<br />
<br />
If I were CEO Blankfein, that is what I would have tossed back at Congress.<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/05/12/congress-sec-and-goldman-sachs-failures-part-2/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Congress, SEC and Goldman Sachs Failures -- Part 2</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/05/12/congress-sec-and-goldman-sachs-failures-part-2/">Congress, SEC and Goldman Sachs Failures -- Part 2</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 12 May 2010 17:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/05/12/congress-sec-and-goldman-sachs-failures-part-2/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19474530/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/05/12/congress-sec-and-goldman-sachs-failures-part-2/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Congressional Budget Office</category><category>Federal Reserve Board</category><category>financial reform</category><category>Goldman Sachs</category><category>GS</category><category>SEC</category><category>Securities and Exchange Commission</category><category>Sheldon Liber</category><category>warren buffett</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Sheldon Liber]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 12 May 2010 17:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Closing Bell: Market Bounces Back with a Vengeance (AIB, MCO, NBG, GS, PLD)]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/05/10/closing-bell-fire-ready-aim-aib-mco-nbg-gs-pld/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/05/10/closing-bell-fire-ready-aim-aib-mco-nbg-gs-pld/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/05/10/closing-bell-fire-ready-aim-aib-mco-nbg-gs-pld/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<img hspace="4" border="1" align="right" vspace="4" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/08/bell-green.jpg" />Today wasn't about an Obama Supreme Court nominee, nor was it about reform or other legislation in the center of the known world (America). Today was simply about an E.U. and IMF coordinated E.U. bailout package measuring close to $1 trillion. <br />
<br />
Cautious housing survey data about homeowners being buried further in their houses did little to harm the markets. In fact, this was one of the days where you ended up feeling bad if each of your stock picks wasn't up 4% or more. <br />
<br />
Here were the unofficial closing bell levels from today's massive day:<br />
<br />
Dow 10,785.74 +405.31 (3.90%) <br />
S&amp;P 500 1,159.68 +48.80 (4.39%) <br />
Nasdaq 2,374.67 +109.03 (4.81%)<br />
<br />
<a href="http://247wallst.com/2010/05/10/top-10-analyst-upgrades-and-downgrades-atvi-ayr-cfn-cmcsa-drwi-rdy-rbcn-spwra-wag-yhoo/">Top Analyst Calls</a><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/05/10/closing-bell-fire-ready-aim-aib-mco-nbg-gs-pld/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Closing Bell: Market Bounces Back with a Vengeance (AIB, MCO, NBG, GS, PLD)</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/05/10/closing-bell-fire-ready-aim-aib-mco-nbg-gs-pld/">Closing Bell: Market Bounces Back with a Vengeance (AIB, MCO, NBG, GS, PLD)</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 10 May 2010 16:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/05/10/closing-bell-fire-ready-aim-aib-mco-nbg-gs-pld/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19471648/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/05/10/closing-bell-fire-ready-aim-aib-mco-nbg-gs-pld/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>greece</category><category>lloyd blankfein</category><category>moodys</category><category>prologis</category><category>sec</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jon Ogg]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 10 May 2010 16:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Goldman Sachs in Settlement Talks with the SEC]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/05/07/goldman-sachs-in-settlement-talks-with-the-sec/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/05/07/goldman-sachs-in-settlement-talks-with-the-sec/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/05/07/goldman-sachs-in-settlement-talks-with-the-sec/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/law/" rel="tag">Law</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/gs/" rel="tag">Goldman Sachs Group (GS)</a></p><a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/category/goldman-sachs/"><strong><img hspace="4" align="right" vspace="4" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2010/02/goldman-sachs-logo-240.jpg" />Goldman Sachs</strong></a><strong> Group Inc.</strong> (<a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/the-goldman-sachs-group-inc/gs/nys">GS</a>) may be in <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748704370704575228232487804548.html?mod=WSJ_hps_LEFTWhatsNews">settlement talks</a> with the Securities and Exchange Commission, according to a report in the <em>Wall Street Journal. </em>As it now stands, both sides are far apart.<br />
<br />
Goldman is being pressured on several fronts and shareholders are losing money. Goldman stock has dropped more than 20% since the start of the SEC civil charges and a shareholder meeting is scheduled for Friday. Goldman directors are expected to discuss revisions in some of the company's practices.<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/05/07/goldman-sachs-in-settlement-talks-with-the-sec/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Goldman Sachs in Settlement Talks with the SEC</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/05/07/goldman-sachs-in-settlement-talks-with-the-sec/">Goldman Sachs in Settlement Talks with the SEC</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 07 May 2010 10:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748704370704575228232487804548.html?mod=WSJ_hps_LEFTWhatsNews>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/05/07/goldman-sachs-in-settlement-talks-with-the-sec/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19468571/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/05/07/goldman-sachs-in-settlement-talks-with-the-sec/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>featured</category><category>goldman sachs</category><category>inthenews</category><category>sec</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Connie Madon]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 07 May 2010 10:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Will Goldman Sachs and the SEC Arrive at a Settlement?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/05/01/goldman-sachs-sec-settlement/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/05/01/goldman-sachs-sec-settlement/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/05/01/goldman-sachs-sec-settlement/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/management/" rel="tag">Management</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/marketmatters/" rel="tag">Market Matters</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/gs/" rel="tag">Goldman Sachs Group (GS)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/financial-crisis/" rel="tag">Financial Crisis</a></p><p><img hspace="4" border="1" align="right" vspace="4" alt=""  src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2010/02/goldman-sachs-logo-240.jpg" />It's been great theater. Goldman Sachs (<a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/the-goldman-sachs-group-inc/gs/nys">GS</a>) executives appeared before Congress and staunchly denied any wrongdoing.</p>
<p>Now Goldman is expected to file a motion with the SEC to dismiss the action.  This would set in motion the grounds for a negotiated settlement.<br />
<br />
Before the congressional committee, CEO <a href="http://www.businessweek.com/magazine/content/10_19/b4177027167701.htm">Lloyd Blankfein</a> was aggressive and outspoken in defending his and the bank's actions. He said: "I heard nothing today that makes me think anything went wrong."</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/05/01/goldman-sachs-sec-settlement/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Will Goldman Sachs and the SEC Arrive at a Settlement?</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/05/01/goldman-sachs-sec-settlement/">Will Goldman Sachs and the SEC Arrive at a Settlement?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Sat, 01 May 2010 11:40:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/05/01/goldman-sachs-sec-settlement/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19459629/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/05/01/goldman-sachs-sec-settlement/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Goldman Sachs</category><category>GS</category><category>SEC</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Connie Madon]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 01 May 2010 11:40:00 EST</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
