<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd">
<channel>
<title>BloggingStocks</title>
<link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com</link>
<description>BloggingStocks</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Flash Crash Report: What Really Happened?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/10/02/flash-crash-report-what-really-happened/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/10/02/flash-crash-report-what-really-happened/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/10/02/flash-crash-report-what-really-happened/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/indices/" rel="tag">Indices</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/marketmatters/" rel="tag">Market Matters</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/sandp-500/" rel="tag">S and P 500</a></p><p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.dailyfinance.com/media/2010/05/downicemay7240.jpg" alt="May 6 flash crash" />After nearly five months, federal regulators have been able to dissect the events of May 6, the day when the Dow plunged almost 1,000 points.</p>
<p>A joint report issued by the Commodity Futures Trading Commission and the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) pieced together that day's events and came up with this finding, as reported in the <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748703859204575525973854203534.html?mod=WSJ_hpp_LEFTTopStories"><em>Wall Street Journal</em></a>. A computerized trading program run by a Waddell &amp; Reed trader automatically sold 35,000 e-mini S&amp;P contracts. These contracts mirror the larger S&amp;P contracts. The trader's program was triggered at 9% of the trade volume.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/10/02/flash-crash-report-what-really-happened/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Flash Crash Report: What Really Happened?</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/10/02/flash-crash-report-what-really-happened/">Flash Crash Report: What Really Happened?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Sat, 02 Oct 2010 09:40:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748703859204575525973854203534.html?mod=WSJ_hpp_LEFTTopStories>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/10/02/flash-crash-report-what-really-happened/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19657944/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/10/02/flash-crash-report-what-really-happened/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Commodity Futures Trading Commission</category><category>electronic trading</category><category>featured</category><category>flash crash report</category><category>inthenews</category><category>May 6</category><category>SEC</category><category>Securities and Exchange Commission</category><category>Waddell Reed</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Connie Madon]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 02 Oct 2010 09:40:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Green Mountain Coffee's SEC Woes Inspire a Bearish Strangle]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/09/29/green-mountain-coffees-sec-woes-inspire-a-bearish-strangle/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/09/29/green-mountain-coffees-sec-woes-inspire-a-bearish-strangle/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/09/29/green-mountain-coffees-sec-woes-inspire-a-bearish-strangle/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/major-movement/" rel="tag">Major Movement</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/bad-news/" rel="tag">Bad News</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/options/" rel="tag">Options</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" alt="Green Mountain Coffee Roasters logo" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2010/08/greenmountainlogo.jpg" />Option volume has skyrocketed on Green Mountain Coffee Roasters (<a class="inlinked" href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/green-mountain-coffee-roasters-inc/gmcr/nas">GMCR</a>) today, after the Vermont-based coffee company announced that the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has <a href="http://www.marketwatch.com/story/green-mountain-coffee-shares-fall-17-on-sec-probe-2010-09-29">taken an interest</a> in GMCR's revenue recognition practices. <br />
<br />
GMCR plunged right out of the gate as traders reacted to the news, with the shares shedding roughly 17% to test round-number support at $30. Option players definitely took notice; within the first two hours of the session, roughly 42,000 calls and 34,000 puts had changed hands on the stock -- outpacing GMCR's predicted daily volume by a massive margin. <br />
<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/09/29/green-mountain-coffees-sec-woes-inspire-a-bearish-strangle/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Green Mountain Coffee's SEC Woes Inspire a Bearish Strangle</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/09/29/green-mountain-coffees-sec-woes-inspire-a-bearish-strangle/">Green Mountain Coffee's SEC Woes Inspire a Bearish Strangle</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 29 Sep 2010 14:30:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/09/29/green-mountain-coffees-sec-woes-inspire-a-bearish-strangle/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19653648/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/09/29/green-mountain-coffees-sec-woes-inspire-a-bearish-strangle/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>calls</category><category>GMCR</category><category>Green Mountain Coffee Roasters</category><category>inthenews</category><category>options</category><category>puts</category><category>SEC</category><category>Securities and Exchange Commission</category><category>strangle</category><category>volatility</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Elizabeth Harrow]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 29 Sep 2010 14:30:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Can Regulators Fix the Market?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/09/14/can-regulators-fix-the-market/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/09/14/can-regulators-fix-the-market/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/09/14/can-regulators-fix-the-market/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/marketmatters/" rel="tag">Market Matters</a></p><img hspace="4" align="right" vspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2010/05/bha0016.jpg"  alt="" />According to a new poll conducted by <a href="http://www.cnbc.com/id/39154764">CNBC/Associated Press</a>, 86% of the 1035 respondents view the market as unfair to small investors following the May 6 Flash Crash, CNBC reported. <br />
<br />
On May 6, the market crashed almost 1000 points in a matter of minutes. Some stocks traded near zero. The cause has yet to be determined. This event took investors by surprise and regulators were blindsided. <br />
<br />
With regulators unsure of the cause of the crash and ways to prevent another one, investors have lost faith in regulators' ability to fix the market.<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/09/14/can-regulators-fix-the-market/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Can Regulators Fix the Market?</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/09/14/can-regulators-fix-the-market/">Can Regulators Fix the Market?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 14 Sep 2010 11:30:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.cnbc.com/id/39154764>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/09/14/can-regulators-fix-the-market/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19632702/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/09/14/can-regulators-fix-the-market/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>inthenews</category><category>regulation</category><category>sec</category><category>securities and exchange commission</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Connie Madon]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 14 Sep 2010 11:30:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Goldman Settles with the SEC for $550 Million]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/07/16/goldman-sec/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/07/16/goldman-sec/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/07/16/goldman-sec/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/gs/" rel="tag">Goldman Sachs Group (GS)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/politics/" rel="tag">Politics</a></p><p><img hspace="4" vspace="4" border="1" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2010/02/goldman-sachs-logo-240.jpg" />If you are familiar with Securities and Exchange Commission cases, you will recognize this boilerplate settlement. By "boilerplate" I mean that Goldman Sachs <a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/the-goldman-sachs-group-inc/gs/nys">(GS)</a> is fined, but neither admits nor denies any of the charges.<br />
<br />
<a href="http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/4bd43894-904c-11df-ad26-00144feab49a.html">Goldman settled for a measly $550 million</a>. This amounts to about a week's worth of trading. Goldman further got regulators to drop all fraud charges and settle for a lower charge, which said the marketing material for collateralized debt obligations(CDOs) "contained incomplete information."</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/07/16/goldman-sec/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Goldman Settles with the SEC for $550 Million</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/07/16/goldman-sec/">Goldman Settles with the SEC for $550 Million</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 16 Jul 2010 10:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/4bd43894-904c-11df-ad26-00144feab49a.html>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/07/16/goldman-sec/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19556513/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/07/16/goldman-sec/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>goldman settlement</category><category>inthenews</category><category>sec</category><category>Securities and Exchange Commission</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Connie Madon]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 16 Jul 2010 10:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[SEC Levels Charges in $40 Million Ponzi Scheme]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/06/03/sec-levels-charges-in-40-million-ponzi-scheme/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/06/03/sec-levels-charges-in-40-million-ponzi-scheme/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/06/03/sec-levels-charges-in-40-million-ponzi-scheme/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/bad-news/" rel="tag">Bad News</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/press-releases/" rel="tag">Press Releases</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/scandals/" rel="tag">Scandals</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/headline-news/" rel="tag">Headline News</a></p><img hspace="4" border="1" align="right" vspace="4" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2010/04/bank.earnings.stacks-of-dollars.getty2.jpg" />Yesterday, SEC officials charged a Miami man for his operation of a $40 million Ponzi scheme. It is alleged that Luis Felipe Perez had fraudulently convinced investors to invest with him to fund his jewelry business and to finance pawn shops in New York. The jewelry businesses of the accused, Lucky Star Diamonds Inc. and Luis Felipe Jewelry Design Corp., have turned out to be no more than sham facades, and both companies were completely void of employees. Both companies have subsequently ceased their -paper only- operations. Likewise, Mr. Perez's pawn shop connections have turned out to be non-existent.<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/06/03/sec-levels-charges-in-40-million-ponzi-scheme/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>SEC Levels Charges in $40 Million Ponzi Scheme</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/06/03/sec-levels-charges-in-40-million-ponzi-scheme/">SEC Levels Charges in $40 Million Ponzi Scheme</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 03 Jun 2010 14:40:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.sec.gov/news/press/2010/2010-95.htm>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/06/03/sec-levels-charges-in-40-million-ponzi-scheme/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19501404/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/06/03/sec-levels-charges-in-40-million-ponzi-scheme/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>inthenews</category><category>Lucky Star Diamonds Inc.</category><category>Luis Felipe Jewelry Design Corp.</category><category>Luis Felipe Perez</category><category>Ponzi Scheme</category><category>SEC</category><category>Securities and Exchange Commission</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Gary Sattler]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 03 Jun 2010 14:40:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Congress, SEC and Goldman Sachs Failures -- Part 2]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/05/12/congress-sec-and-goldman-sachs-failures-part-2/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/05/12/congress-sec-and-goldman-sachs-failures-part-2/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/05/12/congress-sec-and-goldman-sachs-failures-part-2/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/other-issues/" rel="tag">Other Issues</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/rants-and-raves/" rel="tag">Rants and Raves</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/scandals/" rel="tag">Scandals</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/gs/" rel="tag">Goldman Sachs Group (GS)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/headline-news/" rel="tag">Headline News</a></p><font><img hspace="4" vspace="4" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2010/02/goldman-sachs-logo-240.jpg" alt="Goldman Sachs GS logo" /></font>Continuing from where I left off earlier today regarding <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/05/11/congress-sec-and-goldman-sachs-failures-part-1/">the Goldman Sachs - Paulson &amp; Company debacle...</a><br />
<br />
What would have happened if the collateralized debt obligations were created and sold exactly as was done, shorted by Paulson, and the eventual buyer was Warren Buffett? <br />
<br />
First of all, <em>"my pal Warren" </em>would not let his position be known to anyone beyond normal filing requirements and perhaps announced at some later date. Second, if it was disclosed that Buffett was betting against Paulson, Mr Paulson would be a huge fool if he did not think twice about his shorting the CDO given this new piece of information. Third, should the buyers of the actual CDO be treated differently than Buffett, or you or me? Of course not.<br />
<br />
If I were CEO Blankfein, that is what I would have tossed back at Congress.<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/05/12/congress-sec-and-goldman-sachs-failures-part-2/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Congress, SEC and Goldman Sachs Failures -- Part 2</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/05/12/congress-sec-and-goldman-sachs-failures-part-2/">Congress, SEC and Goldman Sachs Failures -- Part 2</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 12 May 2010 17:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/05/12/congress-sec-and-goldman-sachs-failures-part-2/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19474530/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/05/12/congress-sec-and-goldman-sachs-failures-part-2/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Congressional Budget Office</category><category>Federal Reserve Board</category><category>financial reform</category><category>Goldman Sachs</category><category>GS</category><category>SEC</category><category>Securities and Exchange Commission</category><category>Sheldon Liber</category><category>warren buffett</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Sheldon Liber]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 12 May 2010 17:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Congress, SEC and Goldman Sachs Failures]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/05/12/congress-sec-and-goldman-sachs-failures-part-1/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/05/12/congress-sec-and-goldman-sachs-failures-part-1/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/05/12/congress-sec-and-goldman-sachs-failures-part-1/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/rants-and-raves/" rel="tag">Rants and Raves</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/marketmatters/" rel="tag">Market Matters</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/scandals/" rel="tag">Scandals</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/gs/" rel="tag">Goldman Sachs Group (GS)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/politics/" rel="tag">Politics</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/headline-news/" rel="tag">Headline News</a></p><font><img hspace="4" vspace="4" border="1" align="right" alt="Goldman Sachs GS logo" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2010/02/goldman-sachs-logo-240.jpg" /></font>The more I think about the issue of Goldman Sachs (<a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/the-goldman-sachs-group-inc/gs/nys">GS</a>) being charged by the SEC for questionable business practices, and hauled in front of Congress for a big show, the more I think it is Congress that is at fault for the whole financial mess and should be answering questions.<br />
<br />
It is not that Wall Street had no hand in the entire debacle, but it started with Congress and they magnified the damage by failing to correct their critical mistakes. I will get back to this later, but first I want to discuss the recent hearings and the fact that Goldman Sachs management was actually too easy on Congress.<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/05/12/congress-sec-and-goldman-sachs-failures-part-1/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Congress, SEC and Goldman Sachs Failures</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/05/12/congress-sec-and-goldman-sachs-failures-part-1/">Congress, SEC and Goldman Sachs Failures</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 12 May 2010 14:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/05/12/congress-sec-and-goldman-sachs-failures-part-1/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19473000/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/05/12/congress-sec-and-goldman-sachs-failures-part-1/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>cdo</category><category>CDOs</category><category>Congress</category><category>featured</category><category>financial reform</category><category>Goldman Sachs</category><category>GS</category><category>John Paulson</category><category>Paulson Co.</category><category>Securities and Exchange Commission</category><category>Sheldon Liber</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Sheldon Liber]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 12 May 2010 14:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Serious Money: Goldman Sachs Is All the Rage]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/04/19/serious-money-goldman-sachs-is-all-the-rage/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/04/19/serious-money-goldman-sachs-is-all-the-rage/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/04/19/serious-money-goldman-sachs-is-all-the-rage/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/management/" rel="tag">Management</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/rants-and-raves/" rel="tag">Rants and Raves</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/scandals/" rel="tag">Scandals</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/mandftoday/" rel="tag">Money and Finance Today</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/gs/" rel="tag">Goldman Sachs Group (GS)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/serious-money/" rel="tag">Serious Money</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/headline-news/" rel="tag">Headline News</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/stocks-to-buy/" rel="tag">Stocks to Buy</a></p><img hspace="4" border="1" align="right" vspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2010/04/apgoldmanprotest091117mn-1271579363.jpg" style="width: 220px; height: 165px;" alt="" />My, my, what a tangled web we weave, when first we practice...<br />
<br />
It seems Goldman Sachs Group (<a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/the-goldman-sachs-group-inc/gs/nys">GS</a>), now <a href="http://sec.gov/news/press/2010/2010-59.htm">charged with fraud</a> by the Security and Exchange Commission, was doing more than practicing. Apparently its business practices leave much in question about its ethical practices and how far it would go to make a deal. In particular, failing to disclose what the SEC deems material facts that may have altered an investor's decision to buy a collateral debt obligations in the form of a Residential Mortgage Backed Security (RMBS).<br />
<br />
One might think an experienced investor would have been suspicious from the onset about any security that actually included the letters "BS" in its title and that this would have been adequate disclosure.<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/04/19/serious-money-goldman-sachs-is-all-the-rage/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Serious Money: Goldman Sachs Is All the Rage</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/04/19/serious-money-goldman-sachs-is-all-the-rage/">Serious Money: Goldman Sachs Is All the Rage</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 19 Apr 2010 14:20:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/04/19/serious-money-goldman-sachs-is-all-the-rage/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19444174/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/04/19/serious-money-goldman-sachs-is-all-the-rage/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>disclosure</category><category>fraud</category><category>Goldman Sachs</category><category>GS</category><category>SEC</category><category>Securities and Exchange Commission</category><category>Serious Money</category><category>Sheldon Liber</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Sheldon Liber]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 19 Apr 2010 14:20:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Chasing Value: Goldman Sachs Fraud Charge Creates Opportunity]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/04/16/chasing-value-goldman-sachs-opportunity/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/04/16/chasing-value-goldman-sachs-opportunity/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/04/16/chasing-value-goldman-sachs-opportunity/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/law/" rel="tag">Law</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/rants-and-raves/" rel="tag">Rants and Raves</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/jpm/" rel="tag">JPMorgan Chase (JPM)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/mandftoday/" rel="tag">Money and Finance Today</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/gs/" rel="tag">Goldman Sachs Group (GS)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/chasing-value/" rel="tag">Chasing Value[TM]</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/headline-news/" rel="tag">Headline News</a></p><font><img hspace="4" border="1" align="right" vspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2010/02/goldman-sachs-logo-240.jpg"  alt="Goldman Sachs GS logo" /></font>It always amazes me how "group think" sways the market to do stupid things, or at least jump to foolish conclusions.<br />
<br />
Today it was announced that Goldman Sachs Group (<a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/the-goldman-sachs-group-inc/gs/nys">GS</a>) has been charged by the <font>Securities and Exchange Commission <a title="http://sec.gov/news/press/2010/2010-59.htm" href="http://sec.gov/news/press/2010/2010-59.htm">with defrauding investors</a> alleging that they knowingly misstated and omitted key facts about securities tied to sub prime mortgages during the rupturing of the housing bubble when they </font><font>structured and marketed a synthetic collateralized debt obligation (CDO) tied to the performance of subprime residential mortgage-backed securities (RMBS).<br />
<br />
<br />
</font><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/04/16/chasing-value-goldman-sachs-opportunity/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Chasing Value: Goldman Sachs Fraud Charge Creates Opportunity</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/04/16/chasing-value-goldman-sachs-opportunity/">Chasing Value: Goldman Sachs Fraud Charge Creates Opportunity</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 16 Apr 2010 14:30:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/04/16/chasing-value-goldman-sachs-opportunity/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19443157/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/04/16/chasing-value-goldman-sachs-opportunity/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>civil charges</category><category>featured</category><category>Financial penalties</category><category>Goldman Sachs fraud</category><category>Goldman Sachs Group</category><category>GS</category><category>JPM</category><category>JpmorganChase</category><category>Securities and Exchange Commission</category><category>Sheldon Liber</category><category>washington mutual</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Sheldon Liber]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 16 Apr 2010 14:30:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Ponzi goes green, SEC in pursuit]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/17/ponzi-goes-green-sec-in-pursuit/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/17/ponzi-goes-green-sec-in-pursuit/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/17/ponzi-goes-green-sec-in-pursuit/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/sec-filings/" rel="tag">SEC Filings</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/scandals/" rel="tag">Scandals</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/green-stocks/" rel="tag">Green   Stocks</a></p><p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.dailyfinance.com/media/2009/09/money-drain-a200dr071607.jpg" />How do you know the green finance sector has arrived? Well, it got its first Ponzi scheme! Allegedly.</p>
<p>The SEC <a target="_blank" href="http://www.reuters.com/article/newsOne/idUSTRE5AF50W20091116">filed charges against four people and two companies</a> in a Denver federal court on Monday. Mantria Corp. and its principals, Troy Wragg and Amanada Knorr, stand accused of running raising $122 million from more than 300 investors in what could be a dozen fraudulent offers of securities. Mantria engaged Speed of Wealth LLC, run by Wayde and Donna McKelvy, to dump the cash out of their retirement plans and tap their home equity to "invest" in Mantria, which they said was offering returns ranging from 17% to "hundreds of percent" every year.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/17/ponzi-goes-green-sec-in-pursuit/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Ponzi goes green, SEC in pursuit</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/17/ponzi-goes-green-sec-in-pursuit/">Ponzi goes green, SEC in pursuit</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 17 Nov 2009 13:20:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/17/ponzi-goes-green-sec-in-pursuit/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19242645/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/17/ponzi-goes-green-sec-in-pursuit/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Amanada Knorr</category><category>clean</category><category>Cleantech</category><category>Don Hoerl</category><category>Donna McKelvy</category><category>green</category><category>green technology</category><category>inthenews</category><category>Mantria Corp.</category><category>Ponzi Scheme</category><category>SEC</category><category>Securities and Exchange Commission</category><category>Speed of Wealth</category><category>Troy Wragg</category><category>Wayde McKelvy</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tom Johansmeyer]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 17 Nov 2009 13:20:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Two more arrests in Madoff saga]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/13/two-more-arrests-in-madoff-saga/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/13/two-more-arrests-in-madoff-saga/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/13/two-more-arrests-in-madoff-saga/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/scandals/" rel="tag">Scandals</a></p><p><em><img hspace="4" height="300" width="200" vspace="4" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2009/07/alcatraz_prison_jail_1009101_l.jpg" alt="" />Normal tech support phone call: "Press 1 for help with e-mail. Press 2 to have your password reset."</em></p>
<p><em>Madoff tech support phone call: "Hello, how can I help you dummy up some trading records today?"</em></p>
<p>The investigation of <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/tag/BernieMadoff/">Bernie Madoff</a>'s fraudulent financial empire is leading to more arrests. Jerome O'Hara and George Perez, both computer programmers employed by the <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/tag/Ponzi/">Ponzi</a> schemer, were arrested by the FBI on Friday morning. The charges include conspiracy for falsifying books and records. They are accused of <a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/ousivMolt/idUSN1346294620091113 " target="_blank">doing the deed</a> for the boss and accepting hush money -- in the form of 25% raises and net bonuses of $60,000 -- to keep the scam afloat.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/13/two-more-arrests-in-madoff-saga/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Two more arrests in Madoff saga</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/13/two-more-arrests-in-madoff-saga/">Two more arrests in Madoff saga</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 13 Nov 2009 18:20:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.reuters.com/article/ousivMolt/idUSN1346294620091113>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/13/two-more-arrests-in-madoff-saga/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19239249/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/13/two-more-arrests-in-madoff-saga/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>arrest</category><category>arrested</category><category>arrests</category><category>BernardMadoff</category><category>bernie madoff</category><category>BernieMadoff</category><category>criminal</category><category>fbi</category><category>Federal Bureau of Investigation</category><category>FederalBureauOfInvestigation</category><category>fraud</category><category>Information Technology</category><category>InformationTechnology</category><category>litigation</category><category>madoff</category><category>madoff securities</category><category>MadoffPonziScheme</category><category>MadoffScandal</category><category>MadoffSecurities</category><category>programmer</category><category>programmers</category><category>prosecution</category><category>prosecutions</category><category>SEC</category><category>Securities and Exchange Commission</category><category>SecuritiesAndExchangeCommission</category><category>technology</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tom Johansmeyer]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 13 Nov 2009 18:20:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Friehling: Another Madoff domino falls]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/04/friehling-another-madoff-domino-falls/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/04/friehling-another-madoff-domino-falls/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/04/friehling-another-madoff-domino-falls/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/insiders/" rel="tag">Insiders</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/law/" rel="tag">Law</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/scandals/" rel="tag">Scandals</a></p><p><img border="1" hspace="4" alt="" vspace="4" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/07/gavel.jpg" width="220" height="141" />Another player in the <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/tag/BernieMadoff/">Bernie Madoff</a> saga has fallen. His longtime auditor, David Friehling, pleaded guilty in federal court on Tuesday to charges of securities fraud, investment adviser fraud, making false filings with the <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/tag/SEC/">SEC</a>, and obstructing or impeding the administration of the Internal Revenue laws (among others).</p>
<div> </div>
<p>Despite the plea, <a href="http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/33603465/ns/business-us_business/" target="_blank">Friehling still told U.S. District Judge Alvin K. Hellerstein</a>, "At no time was I ever aware Bernard Madoff was engaged in a <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/tag/Ponzischeme/">Ponzi scheme</a>."</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/04/friehling-another-madoff-domino-falls/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Friehling: Another Madoff domino falls</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/04/friehling-another-madoff-domino-falls/">Friehling: Another Madoff domino falls</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 04 Nov 2009 12:20:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/04/friehling-another-madoff-domino-falls/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19221659/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/04/friehling-another-madoff-domino-falls/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>bernard madoff</category><category>bernie madoff</category><category>butner</category><category>david friehling</category><category>dipascali</category><category>frank dipascali</category><category>friehling</category><category>internal revenue service</category><category>inthenews</category><category>irs</category><category>madoff</category><category>manhattan</category><category>new city</category><category>new york</category><category>NewYork</category><category>north carolina</category><category>ponzi scheme</category><category>prison</category><category>prosecutors</category><category>sec</category><category>securities and exchange commission</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tom Johansmeyer]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 12:20:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Supreme Court pushes back on mutual fund issue]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/03/supreme-court-pushes-back-on-mutual-fund-issue/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/03/supreme-court-pushes-back-on-mutual-fund-issue/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/03/supreme-court-pushes-back-on-mutual-fund-issue/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/scandals/" rel="tag">Scandals</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/funds/" rel="tag">Mutual Funds</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/headline-news/" rel="tag">Headline News</a></p><p><a href="http://www.usatoday.com/money/perfi/funds/2009-11-02-mutual-funds-supreme-court-_N.htm" target="_blank"><img border="0" hspace="4" vspace="4" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2009/11/oakmark-sm.jpg" width="220" height="196" alt="" />Investors are calling for an inquiry</a> into mutual fund fees, but the Supreme Court is reminding them that it isn't beholden to public opinion. The mutual fund industry is being accused of charging "excessive" fees, which could be particularly harsh on individual investors who use these tools as their primary way to access the market. Currently, the mutual fund industry has more than $10 trillion in assets under management, some of it through retirement and 529 college savings plans. </p>
<p>The Court doesn't seem inclined to step into the fray, saying that regulatory agencies are better equipped to address the situation. Chief Justice John Roberts, for example, said during arguments that "It makes a lot more sense to have the <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/tag/SEC/">SEC</a> regulate rates than to have courts do it, doesn't it?"</p>
<p> </p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/03/supreme-court-pushes-back-on-mutual-fund-issue/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Supreme Court pushes back on mutual fund issue</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/03/supreme-court-pushes-back-on-mutual-fund-issue/">Supreme Court pushes back on mutual fund issue</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 03 Nov 2009 10:20:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.usatoday.com/money/perfi/funds/2009-11-02-mutual-funds-supreme-court-_N.htm>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/03/supreme-court-pushes-back-on-mutual-fund-issue/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19219989/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/03/supreme-court-pushes-back-on-mutual-fund-issue/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>antonin scalia</category><category>AntoninScalia</category><category>chief justice</category><category>ChiefJustice</category><category>fees</category><category>inthenews</category><category>john roberts</category><category>JohnRoberts</category><category>mutual fund</category><category>MutualFund</category><category>oakmark fund</category><category>OakmarkFund</category><category>sec</category><category>securities and exchange commission</category><category>SecuritiesAndExchangeCommission</category><category>stephen breyer</category><category>StephenBreyer</category><category>supreme court</category><category>SupremeCourt</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tom Johansmeyer]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2009 10:20:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Who is Ralph Janvey? Stanford's victims know he wants a third]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/08/16/who-is-ralph-janvey-stanford-s-victims-know-he-wants-a-third/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/08/16/who-is-ralph-janvey-stanford-s-victims-know-he-wants-a-third/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/08/16/who-is-ralph-janvey-stanford-s-victims-know-he-wants-a-third/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/privateequity/" rel="tag">Private Equity</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/scandals/" rel="tag">Scandals</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/headline-news/" rel="tag">Headline News</a></p><div style="DISPLAY: block" id="imageResults"><img border="1" hspace="4" alt="" vspace="4" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2009/02/stanford.jpg" width="160" height="100" /></div>
<p>Sir Allen Stanford's attorney doesn't like Ralph Janvey, but that's not surprising. The <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/tag/SEC/">SEC</a> isn't crazy about him either, and U.S. Judge David Godbey told him, "You know everyone in the courtroom is angry with you," <a href="http://www.usatoday.com/money/industries/brokerage/2009-08-14-stanford-attorney_N.htm" target="_blank">according to a report in <em>USA Today</em></a>.</p>
<p>Janvey has been tasked with taking over and cleaning up the wreckage from Stanford's $7 billion Ponzi scheme -- the second largest known disaster of this kind. Along the way, he's managed to piss off everyone he's encountered. The latest "transgression" is his demand for more than $27 million in fees for his team and the consultants he's hired to track down the missing billions of dollars in Stanford's former empire.</p>
<p> </p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/08/16/who-is-ralph-janvey-stanford-s-victims-know-he-wants-a-third/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Who is Ralph Janvey? Stanford's victims know he wants a third</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/08/16/who-is-ralph-janvey-stanford-s-victims-know-he-wants-a-third/">Who is Ralph Janvey? Stanford's victims know he wants a third</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Sun, 16 Aug 2009 11:40:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/08/16/who-is-ralph-janvey-stanford-s-victims-know-he-wants-a-third/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19130612/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/08/16/who-is-ralph-janvey-stanford-s-victims-know-he-wants-a-third/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>allen stanford</category><category>inthenews</category><category>ponzi</category><category>ponzi finance</category><category>ponzi scheme</category><category>r allen stanford</category><category>sec</category><category>securities and exchange commission</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tom Johansmeyer]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 16 Aug 2009 11:40:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Bernie Madoff expresses surprise at how long his scheme lasted]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/29/bernie-madoff-expresses-surprise-at-how-long-his-scheme-lasted/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/29/bernie-madoff-expresses-surprise-at-how-long-his-scheme-lasted/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/29/bernie-madoff-expresses-surprise-at-how-long-his-scheme-lasted/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/law/" rel="tag">Law</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/scandals/" rel="tag">Scandals</a></p><p><img border="1" hspace="4" alt="" vspace="4" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.dailyfinance.com/media/2009/07/rsz_madoff1.jpg" />So, here's one for you -- according to Joseph Cotchett (a lawyer for some of Bernie Madoff's victims), Bernie Madoff is surprised that his <a href="http://money.aol.com/article/madoff-surprised-fraud-lasted-so-long/571640">Ponzi scheme lasted as long as it did</a>. The revelation came during a 4.5 hour interview, wherein Madoff revealed how the scheme worked and how securities regulators didn't catch him. Madoff did apologize, repeatedly, for the harm he caused victims.</p>
<p>The most interesting part of the interview is when Madoff described meetings with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) while he was committing the fraud and how the SEC was unable to catch him, which didn't surprise him. These comments lead Cotchett to theorize that "many people" were negligent, including the government watchdog agencies. Let's not forget that the SEC has seen no evidence of wrongdoing by its staff as far as the Madoff situation is concerned. Nevertheless, the SEC has undergone many changes in order to continue to protect investors and the market.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/29/bernie-madoff-expresses-surprise-at-how-long-his-scheme-lasted/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Bernie Madoff expresses surprise at how long his scheme lasted</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/29/bernie-madoff-expresses-surprise-at-how-long-his-scheme-lasted/">Bernie Madoff expresses surprise at how long his scheme lasted</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 29 Jul 2009 11:30:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/29/bernie-madoff-expresses-surprise-at-how-long-his-scheme-lasted/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19112928/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/29/bernie-madoff-expresses-surprise-at-how-long-his-scheme-lasted/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Bernie Madoff</category><category>inthenews</category><category>investigations</category><category>Joseph Cotchett</category><category>law</category><category>Ponzi scheme</category><category>scandal</category><category>SEC</category><category>securities and exchange commission</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark Fightmaster]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 29 Jul 2009 11:30:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Madoff bean-counter pleads not guilty]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/19/madoff-bean-counter-pleads-not-guilty/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/19/madoff-bean-counter-pleads-not-guilty/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/19/madoff-bean-counter-pleads-not-guilty/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/bad-news/" rel="tag">Bad News</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/scandals/" rel="tag">Scandals</a></p><p><img alt="" hspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/12/lunch-money.jpg" align="right" vspace="4" border="1" />David Friehling is only the second person to face criminal charges in the <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/tag/BernardMadoff/">Bernard Madoff</a> debacle. He served as <a href="http://www.usatoday.com/money/industries/brokerage/2009-07-17-madoff-auditor-pleads_N.htm" target="_blank">Madoff's auditor from 1991 to 2008</a>, though it's hard to say if they'll resume their relationship as cellies. For now, Friehling has only been charged (innocent until proven guilty, and such) with securities fraud, abetting investment adviser fraud and filing false reports with the <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/tag/SEC/">SEC</a>. On five of the six charges filed, he faces a 20-year maximum. </p>
<p>It's alleged that Friehling didn't conduct "meaningful" audits while in Madoff's employ, despite issuing reports saying that he'd done his job -- which paid close to $15,000 a month (no work for big pay . . .  where do I sign up?). In particular, he's said to have not bothered to verify Madoff's business assets, revenue sources or bank accounts. This is no-brainer stuff for an <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/tag/auditor/">auditor</a>.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/19/madoff-bean-counter-pleads-not-guilty/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Madoff bean-counter pleads not guilty</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/19/madoff-bean-counter-pleads-not-guilty/">Madoff bean-counter pleads not guilty</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Sun, 19 Jul 2009 16:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.usatoday.com/money/industries/brokerage/2009-07-17-madoff-auditor-pleads_N.htm>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/19/madoff-bean-counter-pleads-not-guilty/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19102624/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/19/madoff-bean-counter-pleads-not-guilty/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>accountant</category><category>accounting</category><category>auditor</category><category>bernard madoff</category><category>BernardMadoff</category><category>bernie madoff</category><category>BernieMadoff</category><category>featured</category><category>fraud</category><category>madoff</category><category>madoff scandal</category><category>madoff securities</category><category>madoffponzischeme</category><category>MadoffScandal</category><category>MadoffSecurities</category><category>scandal</category><category>sec</category><category>securities and exchange commission</category><category>securities fraud</category><category>SecuritiesAndExchangeCommission</category><category>SecuritiesFraud</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tom Johansmeyer]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 19 Jul 2009 16:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[State Street unit slapped with Wells Notice]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/06/29/state-street-unit-slapped-with-wells-notice/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/06/29/state-street-unit-slapped-with-wells-notice/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/06/29/state-street-unit-slapped-with-wells-notice/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/sec-filings/" rel="tag">SEC Filings</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/bad-news/" rel="tag">Bad News</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/options/" rel="tag">Options</a></p><p><img border="1" hspace="4" vspace="4" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/11/stt-state-street-logo.jpg" alt="" /><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/state-street-corporation/stt/nys">State Street Corp.</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/state-street-corporation/stt/nys">STT</a>) said today that its State Street Bank &amp; Trust Co. unit received a <a href="http://money.aol.com/news/articles/qp/ap/_a/sec-tells-state-street-it-could-face/rfid227350662">Wells Notice</a> from the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). The notice, which indicates that civil charges may be brought against the company, relates to disclosures and management of certain fixed-income strategies during 2007 and previous periods.</p>
<p>Some investors have accused State Street of misleading them about the risks involved in mortgage-related investments. A <a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/marketsnews/idINN2935547920090629?rpc=33">legal reserve fund</a> worth $625 million was established in 2007 to cover investor claims, and $418 million has already been paid out. The firm says it is currently cooperating with the SEC, as well as state and other regulators.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/06/29/state-street-unit-slapped-with-wells-notice/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>State Street unit slapped with Wells Notice</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/06/29/state-street-unit-slapped-with-wells-notice/">State Street unit slapped with Wells Notice</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 29 Jun 2009 11:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/06/29/state-street-unit-slapped-with-wells-notice/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19081206/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/06/29/state-street-unit-slapped-with-wells-notice/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>inthenews</category><category>options</category><category>SEC</category><category>Securities and Exchange Commission</category><category>State Street</category><category>STT</category><category>technical analysis</category><category>Wells notice</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Elizabeth Harrow]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 29 Jun 2009 11:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Ponzi manager pleads guilty and settles civil charges]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/06/26/ponzi-manager-pleads-guilty-and-settles-civil-charges/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/06/26/ponzi-manager-pleads-guilty-and-settles-civil-charges/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/06/26/ponzi-manager-pleads-guilty-and-settles-civil-charges/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/scandals/" rel="tag">Scandals</a></p><div style="display: block;" id="imageResults"><img width="240" vspace="4" hspace="4" height="171" border="1" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/07/cuffs1.jpg" /></div>
<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/tag/Hedgefund/">Hedge fund</a> manager Michael Regan <a target="_blank" href="http://www.finalternatives.com/node/8346">has pleaded guilty to running a Ponzi scheme</a>. Manager of the Massachusetts-based River Stream Fund, he admitted to defrauding around 70 investors. The fund held just shy of $20 million in assets ... despite the relatively meager $101,600 sitting in its accounts. The fund purported to return 20 percent a year since 2001, paying out $9 million in "profits" and returned capital. </p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/06/26/ponzi-manager-pleads-guilty-and-settles-civil-charges/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Ponzi manager pleads guilty and settles civil charges</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/06/26/ponzi-manager-pleads-guilty-and-settles-civil-charges/">Ponzi manager pleads guilty and settles civil charges</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 26 Jun 2009 15:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.finalternatives.com/node/8346>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/06/26/ponzi-manager-pleads-guilty-and-settles-civil-charges/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19079668/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/06/26/ponzi-manager-pleads-guilty-and-settles-civil-charges/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>fraud</category><category>fraud investigation</category><category>FraudInvestigation</category><category>frauds</category><category>hedge fund</category><category>hedge fund collapse</category><category>hedge funds</category><category>HedgeFund</category><category>HedgeFundCollapse</category><category>HedgeFunds</category><category>inthenews</category><category>massachusetts</category><category>ponzi</category><category>ponzi scheme</category><category>ponzi schemes</category><category>PonziScheme</category><category>PonziSchemes</category><category>sec</category><category>securities and exchange commission</category><category>SecuritiesAndExchangeCommission</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tom Johansmeyer]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 26 Jun 2009 15:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Matrixx Initiatives plummets to 11-year low on SEC inquiry]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/06/23/matrixx-initiatives-plummets-to-11-year-low-on-sec-inquiry/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/06/23/matrixx-initiatives-plummets-to-11-year-low-on-sec-inquiry/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/06/23/matrixx-initiatives-plummets-to-11-year-low-on-sec-inquiry/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/major-movement/" rel="tag">Major Movement</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/bad-news/" rel="tag">Bad News</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/options/" rel="tag">Options</a></p><p><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/matrixx-initiatives-inc/mtxx/nas">Matrixx Initiatives</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/matrixx-initiatives-inc/mtxx/nas">MTXX</a>), maker of the allegedly scent-stealing Zicam nasal swabs, tumbled to a new annual low this morning on news that the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) is <a href="http://www.streetinsider.com/Corporate+News/Matrixx+Initiatives+%28MTXX%29+Receives+Informal+Inquiry+from+SEC+On+FDA+Zicam+Issues/4748970.html">launching an informal inquiry</a>. The SEC is requesting documents and other information regarding the warning letter issued to Matrixx by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration.</p>
<p>Last week, the FDA told consumers to stop using certain nasally administered Zicam products after the agency received more than 130 complaints from users who <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/06/16/closing-bell-sentiment-shifts-to-show-me-amgn-bby-mtxx-n/">lost their sense of smell</a>. Matrixx has defended its homeopathic, over-the-counter offerings, calling the safety concerns "erroneous," but the firm settled hundreds of lawsuits in 2006 with consumers making the same allegations.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/06/23/matrixx-initiatives-plummets-to-11-year-low-on-sec-inquiry/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Matrixx Initiatives plummets to 11-year low on SEC inquiry</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/06/23/matrixx-initiatives-plummets-to-11-year-low-on-sec-inquiry/">Matrixx Initiatives plummets to 11-year low on SEC inquiry</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 23 Jun 2009 13:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/06/23/matrixx-initiatives-plummets-to-11-year-low-on-sec-inquiry/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19075330/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/06/23/matrixx-initiatives-plummets-to-11-year-low-on-sec-inquiry/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>FDA</category><category>Food and Drug Administration</category><category>FoodAndDrugAdministration</category><category>inthenews</category><category>Matrixx Initiatives</category><category>MatrixxInitiatives</category><category>MTXX</category><category>options</category><category>SEC</category><category>Securities and Exchange Commission</category><category>SecuritiesAndExchangeCommission</category><category>Zicam</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Elizabeth Harrow]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 23 Jun 2009 13:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Insider trading probe to shut Pequot Capital Management]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/05/28/insider-trading-probe-to-shut-pequot-capital-management/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/05/28/insider-trading-probe-to-shut-pequot-capital-management/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/05/28/insider-trading-probe-to-shut-pequot-capital-management/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/sec-filings/" rel="tag">SEC Filings</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/scandals/" rel="tag">Scandals</a></p><p><img border="0" hspace="4" alt="" vspace="4" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2009/05/pequot.gif" />Pequot Capital Management is coming to an end, <a href="http://bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&amp;sid=adzQGDVos7OQ&amp;refer=home" target="_blank">closing the book on two decades of hedge fund history</a>. Arthur Samberg, at one point the biggest hedge fund manager in the world, is closing the company as a result of a <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/tag/SecuritiesandExchangeCommission/">Securities and Exchange Commission</a> (SEC) insider trading investigation. </p>
<p>At its peak in 2001, Pequot had $15 million in assets under management. By November 2008, it was only $4.3 billion ... and $3.47 billion as of May 15, 2009, according to a regulatory filing. </p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/05/28/insider-trading-probe-to-shut-pequot-capital-management/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Insider trading probe to shut Pequot Capital Management</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/05/28/insider-trading-probe-to-shut-pequot-capital-management/">Insider trading probe to shut Pequot Capital Management</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 28 May 2009 08:20:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&amp;sid=adzQGDVos7OQ&amp;refer=home>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/05/28/insider-trading-probe-to-shut-pequot-capital-management/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19050149/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/05/28/insider-trading-probe-to-shut-pequot-capital-management/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>hedge</category><category>hedge fund</category><category>insider trading</category><category>inthenews</category><category>pequot capital</category><category>pequot ventures</category><category>samberg</category><category>sec</category><category>securities</category><category>securities and exchange commission</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tom Johansmeyer]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 28 May 2009 08:20:00 EST</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
