<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd">
<channel>
<title>BloggingStocks</title>
<link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com</link>
<description>BloggingStocks</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Texas Instruments disappoints Wall Street during the second quarter]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/07/21/texas-instruments-disappoints-wall-street-during-the-second-quar/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/07/21/texas-instruments-disappoints-wall-street-during-the-second-quar/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/07/21/texas-instruments-disappoints-wall-street-during-the-second-quar/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/earnings-reports/" rel="tag">Earnings Reports</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/msft/" rel="tag">Microsoft (MSFT)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/aapl/" rel="tag">Apple Inc (AAPL)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/txn/" rel="tag">Texas Instruments (TXN)</a></p><p>Semiconductor company <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/texas-instruments-incorporated/txn/nys">Texas Instruments</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/texas-instruments-incorporated/txn/nys">TXN</a>) reported results for the <a href="http://money.aol.com/news/articles/qp/pr/_a/ti-reports-financial-results-for-2q08/rfid123628925?channel=">second quarter</a>, and the stock sold off during the after-hours session on Monday. At one point shares were down 11%. </p>
<p>I can sort of see why this happened. It wasn't an exciting earnings release at all, especially in a bad market. First, the top line decreased by about 2% to $3.35 billion. Earnings from continuing operations on a diluted basis grew by only 5% to 42 cents per share. Operational cash flow declined by 42% to $520 million. Nope, not my kind of earnings release, let me tell you. Texas Instruments doesn't seem to have the right stuff in terms of bottom-line growth. Management pointed out that the challenging economy has led to weak demand. Also, let me add that, according to this <a href="http://www.rttnews.com/ArticleView.aspx?Id=659891&amp;Category=Top%20story">article</a>, the results missed estimates by two pennies. </p>
<p>I don't really want to own Texas Instruments here. If I had to buy a tech stock, I'd be more inclined to look at a <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/microsoft-corporation/msft/nas">Microsoft </a>(NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/microsoft-corporation/msft/nas">MSFT</a>) or an <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/apple-inc/aapl/nas">Apple</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/apple-inc/aapl/nas">AAPL</a>). Apple also reported earnings on Monday and <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/07/21/apple-shares-drop-4-after-reporting-record-quarter/">saw its shares slide</a> after delivering a much stronger quarter than the one delivered by Texas Instruments. That about says it all, doesn't it?</p>
<p><em>Disclosure: I don't own any company mentioned; positions can change at any time.</em> </p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/07/21/texas-instruments-disappoints-wall-street-during-the-second-quar/">Texas Instruments disappoints Wall Street during the second quarter</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 21 Jul 2008 20:10:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://money.aol.com/news/articles/qp/pr/_a/ti-reports-financial-results-for-2q08/rfid123628925?channel=>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/07/21/texas-instruments-disappoints-wall-street-during-the-second-quar/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1262965/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/07/21/texas-instruments-disappoints-wall-street-during-the-second-quar/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>AAPL</category><category>Apple</category><category>chips</category><category>computer industry</category><category>ComputerIndustry</category><category>inthenews</category><category>Microsoft</category><category>MSFT</category><category>semiconductor</category><category>semiconductor industry</category><category>SemiconductorIndustry</category><category>Texas Instruments</category><category>TexasInstruments</category><category>TXN</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Steven Mallas]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 21 Jul 2008 20:10:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Earnings previews: Intel (INTC) and Johnson &amp; Johnson (JNJ)]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/10/14/earnings-previews-intel-intc-and-johnson-and-johnson-jnj/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/10/14/earnings-previews-intel-intc-and-johnson-and-johnson-jnj/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/10/14/earnings-previews-intel-intc-and-johnson-and-johnson-jnj/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/earnings-reports/" rel="tag">Earnings Reports</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/intc/" rel="tag">Intel (INTC)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/jnj/" rel="tag">Johnson and Johnson (JNJ)</a></p><p>The earnings season crunch is upon us once more, and among those reporting next week are <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/intel-corporation/intc/nas">Intel Corp.</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/intel-corporation/intc/nas">INTC</a>) and <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/johnson-and-johns-dc/jnj/nys">Johnson &amp; Johnson</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/johnson-and-johns-dc/jnj/nys">JNJ</a>).</p>
<p><img width="100" vspace="4" hspace="4" height="67" border="0" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/09/intc-intel-logo.jpg" alt="Intel NASDAQ:INTC logo" />In its second quarter report in July, <a href="http://www.thomsoninvestortools.com/component/firm/aol/view.asp?country=US&amp;tier=default&amp;symbol=INTC&amp;uid=stocks/earnings">Intel reported earnings per share of 22 cents</a>, beating Wall Street's expectation by three cents. In fact, Intel has beat analysts' expectations in the past four quarters, and also has had one-year earnings per share growth of 32 percent, which was better than the S&amp;P 500 <em>and</em> the semiconductor industry average. For the third quarter, analysts surveyed by Thomson Financial expect Intel to report EPS of 30 cents -- profit growth of 35 percent and revenue growth of 10 percent -- which is in line with <a href="http://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/50863/000005086307000326/exhibit99-1.htm">Intel's updated guidance</a>. </p>
<p>Analysts surveyed by Thomson Financial <a href="http://www.thomsoninvestortools.com/component/firm/aol/view.asp?country=US&amp;tier=default&amp;symbol=INTC&amp;uid=stocks/earnings&amp;view=recommendations">recommend buying INTC</a>: 15 rate it a strong buy, 16 a buy, and only 7 a hold. The share price is <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/intel-corporation/intc/nas/charts?dr=YTD&amp;symbs=&amp;ag=mov_avg_100&amp;index=&amp;te=mountain&amp;se=default&amp;hs=on&amp;vs=on&amp;sym=INTC&amp;exch=USA&amp;state=1&amp;settings=1&amp;vl1=off&amp;ss1=off&amp;dv1=off&amp;hs1=on&amp;vs1=on&amp;scs=0&amp;daysb4=0&amp;fromdate=&amp;todate=&amp;freq=1&amp;timeframe=20">trading near its 52-week high</a> of $26.58, up from a 52-week low of $18.75 in March. The share price closed Friday at $25.55.</p>
<p>For more on what's been going on with Intel, check out BloggingStocks' <a href="http://intc.bloggingstocks.com/">Intel coverage</a>.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/10/14/earnings-previews-intel-intc-and-johnson-and-johnson-jnj/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Earnings previews: Intel (INTC) and Johnson &amp; Johnson (JNJ)</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/10/14/earnings-previews-intel-intc-and-johnson-and-johnson-jnj/">Earnings previews: Intel (INTC) and Johnson &amp; Johnson (JNJ)</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Sun, 14 Oct 2007 11:10:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/10/14/earnings-previews-intel-intc-and-johnson-and-johnson-jnj/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1012681/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/10/14/earnings-previews-intel-intc-and-johnson-and-johnson-jnj/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>earnings</category><category>earnings reports</category><category>INTC</category><category>Intel</category><category>JNJ</category><category>Johnson and Johnson</category><category>pharmaceutical industry</category><category>semiconductor industry</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Trey Thoelcke]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 14 Oct 2007 11:10:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Private equity's free-wheeling on Freescale]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/05/11/private-equitys-free-wheeling-on-freescale/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/05/11/private-equitys-free-wheeling-on-freescale/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/05/11/private-equitys-free-wheeling-on-freescale/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/mot/" rel="tag">Motorola (MOT)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/privateequity/" rel="tag">Private Equity</a></p><p><img alt="" hspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/05/freescale.gif" align="right" vspace="4" border="1" />Over the past few years, private equity firms have shown an appetite for mega deals -- and even riskier sectors, such as semiconductors.</p>
<p>A prime example is the $17.6 billion buyout of <a href="http://www.freescale.com">Freescale</a>. The buyers included <a href="http://www.bloggingbuyouts.com/the-blackstone-group/">Blackstone Group</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingbuyouts.com/the-carlyle-group/">Carlyle</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingbuyouts.com/permira/">Permira Advisers</a>, and the <a href="http://www.bloggingbuyouts.com/texas-pacific-group/">Texas Pacific Group</a>.</p>
<p>Well, according to a piece in the <a href="http://www.wsj.com">Wall Street Journal</a> [a paid service], the deal may show the inherent risks of the new approaches to private equity. That is, Freescale has posted weak financials lately. A big problem as been the slowdown from its major customer, <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/motorola-inc/mot/nys">Motorola, Inc.</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/motorola-inc/mot/nys">MOT</a>).</p>
<p>Of course, the private equity sponsors understood the volatile nature of the semiconductor industry. They also realized that the debt markets were carefree with lending money. As a result, there is about $1.5 billion in Freescale debt that is variable. This means that the company can defer payments (kind of nice, huh?).</p>
<p>This is fine so long as the company eventually comes back. But, history is not so kind to semiconductor companies and there is certainly a good amount of competition. Another nice feature: Freescale can call on $750 million in new loans at any moment.</p>
<p>No doubt, it's good to be in the private equity business. Although, as for those holding debt in these deals, it does look fairly risky.</p>
<p><em>Tom Taulli is the author of various books, including the Complete M&amp;A Handbook and the EDGAR-Online Guide to Decoding Financial Statements.</em></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/05/11/private-equitys-free-wheeling-on-freescale/">Private equity's free-wheeling on Freescale</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 11 May 2007 17:11:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/05/11/private-equitys-free-wheeling-on-freescale/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/894504/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/05/11/private-equitys-free-wheeling-on-freescale/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Blackstone Group</category><category>Carlyle</category><category>Freescale</category><category>MOT</category><category>Motorola</category><category>Permira Advisers</category><category>private equity</category><category>PrivateEquity</category><category>semiconductor industry</category><category>semiconductors</category><category>Texas Pacific Group</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tom Taulli]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 11 May 2007 17:11:00 EST</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
