<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd">
<channel>
<title>BloggingStocks</title>
<link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com</link>
<description>BloggingStocks</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Tesla Revs Up for an IPO]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/01/31/tesla-revs-up-for-an-ipo/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/01/31/tesla-revs-up-for-an-ipo/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/01/31/tesla-revs-up-for-an-ipo/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/nextbigthing/" rel="tag">Next Big Thing</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/initial-public-offerings/" rel="tag">Initial Public Offerings</a></p><p><img hspace="4" vspace="4" border="1" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2010/01/tesla-logo-240.jpg" />The widely anticipated <a href="http://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1318605/000119312510017054/ds1.htm">IPO for Tesla Motors</a> is finally here. Based in Silicon Valley, the company designs and manufactures high-performance, fully electric cars. The investors include the co-founders of Google (<a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/google-inc/goog/nas">GOOG</a>), Larry Page and Sergey Brin, and the founder is Elon Musk, who helped create PayPal.</p>
<p>The company's first car, which came on the market in 2008, is the Tesla Roadster. It can go from zero to 60 MHP in 3.9 seconds -- without any tailpipe emissions. On a single charge, the car can also go 236 miles. However, the price tag comes to a hefty $109,000.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/01/31/tesla-revs-up-for-an-ipo/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Tesla Revs Up for an IPO</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/01/31/tesla-revs-up-for-an-ipo/">Tesla Revs Up for an IPO</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Sun, 31 Jan 2010 10:10:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/01/31/tesla-revs-up-for-an-ipo/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19338225/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/01/31/tesla-revs-up-for-an-ipo/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>DB</category><category>Deutsche Bank</category><category>electric vehicles</category><category>Elon Musk</category><category>Goldman Sachs</category><category>GoldmanSachs</category><category>GOOG</category><category>Google</category><category>GS</category><category>inthenews</category><category>IPOs</category><category>JPM</category><category>JPMorgan</category><category>Larry Page</category><category>Morgan Stanley</category><category>MS</category><category>Paypal</category><category>Sergey Brin</category><category>Tesla</category><category>Tesla Model S</category><category>Tesla Roadster</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tom Taulli]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 31 Jan 2010 10:10:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Did Google try to buy Twitter?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/25/did-google-try-to-buy-twitter/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/25/did-google-try-to-buy-twitter/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/25/did-google-try-to-buy-twitter/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/goog/" rel="tag">Google (GOOG)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/msft/" rel="tag">Microsoft (MSFT)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/twx/" rel="tag">Time Warner (TWX)</a></p><p><img border="1" hspace="4" alt="" vspace="4" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2009/06/twitter_logo_200.jpg" width="160" height="59" /><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/tag/SergeyBrin/">Sergey Brin</a> claims that <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/google-inc/goog/nas" target="_blank">Google</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/google-inc/goog/nas" target="_blank">GOOG</a>) didn't try to buy <a href="http://twitter.com" target="_blank">Twitter</a>. The co-founder of the search engine giant <a href="http://blogs.reuters.com/mediafile/2009/10/23/googles-brin-clears-the-air-sort-of-on-twitter/" target="_blank">made a surprise appearance</a> at Web 2.0 Thursday, where organizer John Battelle asked point blank if he'd made a move for the popular <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/tag/microblogging/">microblogging</a> website.</p>
<p>Of course, Brin revealed his fluency in corporate speak, continuing, "But if companies approach us we definitely consider any opportunities to buy," <a href="http://blogs.reuters.com/mediafile/2009/10/23/googles-brin-clears-the-air-sort-of-on-twitter/" target="_blank">according to Reuters</a>. A denial doesn't always mean a denial, especially if there were agreements to keep negotiations confidential.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/25/did-google-try-to-buy-twitter/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Did Google try to buy Twitter?</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/25/did-google-try-to-buy-twitter/">Did Google try to buy Twitter?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Sun, 25 Oct 2009 11:20:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/25/did-google-try-to-buy-twitter/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19208514/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/25/did-google-try-to-buy-twitter/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>america online</category><category>aol</category><category>aol search</category><category>goog</category><category>google</category><category>inthenews</category><category>john battelle</category><category>microblog</category><category>microblogging</category><category>microsoft</category><category>msft</category><category>search engines</category><category>sergey brin</category><category>tim armstrong</category><category>time warner</category><category>twitter</category><category>twx</category><category>web 2.0</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tom Johansmeyer]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 25 Oct 2009 11:20:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Google China loses its head]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/06/google-china-loses-its-head/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/06/google-china-loses-its-head/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/06/google-china-loses-its-head/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/goog/" rel="tag">Google (GOOG)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/msft/" rel="tag">Microsoft (MSFT)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/china/" rel="tag">China</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/technology/" rel="tag">Technology</a></p><p><img border="1" hspace="4" alt="" vspace="4" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/10/google-goog.jpg" />Kai-Fu Lee, <a href="http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/9b3a9b76-9903-11de-aa1b-00144feabdc0.html" target="_blank">head of Google's China operations</a>, resigned on Friday. This brings to a close four years of controversy, as the search engine giant censored its search results in order to pick up some market share in the largest internet market in the world (by population). </p>
<p>The change follows fresh debate within <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/google-inc/goog/nas" target="_blank">Google</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/google-inc/goog/nas" target="_blank">GOOG</a>) -- which claims to live by the motto "don't be evil" -- about whether to exit the Chinese market. The internal discussion is the result of another round of conflict with government authorities in China.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/06/google-china-loses-its-head/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Google China loses its head</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/06/google-china-loses-its-head/">Google China loses its head</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Sun, 06 Sep 2009 16:10:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/9b3a9b76-9903-11de-aa1b-00144feabdc0.html>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/06/google-china-loses-its-head/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19152695/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/06/google-china-loses-its-head/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>baidu</category><category>baidu inc</category><category>bidu</category><category>goog</category><category>google</category><category>internet</category><category>inthenews</category><category>microsoft</category><category>msft</category><category>search</category><category>search engines</category><category>sergey brin</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tom Johansmeyer]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 06 Sep 2009 16:10:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Google professor/investor dies]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/06/08/google-professor-investor-dies/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/06/08/google-professor-investor-dies/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/06/08/google-professor-investor-dies/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/goog/" rel="tag">Google (GOOG)</a></p><p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2009/06/goog.jpg" alt="" />Rajeev Motwani, who <a href="http://gigaom.com/2009/06/05/goodbye-old-friend-r-i-p-rajeev-motwani/">died this week</a> at 47, was one of the most versatile tech veterans in Silicon Valley. From New Delhi, he came to this country in the 1980s and certainly realized the American dream.</p>
<p>Motwani earned his Ph.D. in Computer Science from U.C. Berkeley, and from there he went over to Stanford. Interestingly enough, he taught Larry Page and Sergey Brin -- the co-founders of <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/google-inc/goog/nas">Google</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/google-inc/goog/nas">GOOG</a>). In fact, they wrote a key paper that was the harbinger of PageRank.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/06/08/google-professor-investor-dies/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Google professor/investor dies</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/06/08/google-professor-investor-dies/">Google professor/investor dies</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 08 Jun 2009 12:20:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/06/08/google-professor-investor-dies/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19060625/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/06/08/google-professor-investor-dies/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>GOOG</category><category>Google</category><category>inthenews</category><category>Larry Page</category><category>Rajeev Motwani</category><category>Sergey Brin</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tom Taulli]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 08 Jun 2009 12:20:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Google's top execs keep $1 salaries, forgo bonuses]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/25/googles-top-execs-keep-1-salaries-forgo-bonuses/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/25/googles-top-execs-keep-1-salaries-forgo-bonuses/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/25/googles-top-execs-keep-1-salaries-forgo-bonuses/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/management/" rel="tag">Management</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/goog/" rel="tag">Google (GOOG)</a></p><p><img hspace="4" border="0" align="right" vspace="4" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2009/03/goog.jpg" /><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/google-inc-cl-a/goog/nas">Google Inc.</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/google-inc-cl-a/goog/nas">GOOG</a>) CEO Eric Schmidt and its thirty-something founders Larry Page and Sergey Brin will again toss themselves a $1 annual salary this year. Their salary compensation has been a single greenback ever since Google went public in 2004. </p>
<p>The three will also forgo the bonuses and stock awards that are given to many of the search giant's 20,000 employees. But the beggar bags should not go out just yet.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/25/googles-top-execs-keep-1-salaries-forgo-bonuses/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Google's top execs keep $1 salaries, forgo bonuses</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/25/googles-top-execs-keep-1-salaries-forgo-bonuses/">Google's top execs keep $1 salaries, forgo bonuses</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 25 Mar 2009 13:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.google.com/hostednews/ap/article/ALeqM5hQLa0Fjah48jeuxYvQWobHxZj2AwD974NF900>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/25/googles-top-execs-keep-1-salaries-forgo-bonuses/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1497747/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/25/googles-top-execs-keep-1-salaries-forgo-bonuses/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Eric Schmidt</category><category>EricSchmidt</category><category>featured</category><category>GOOG</category><category>Google</category><category>inthenews</category><category>Larry Page</category><category>LarryPage</category><category>Sergey Brin</category><category>SergeyBrin</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Brian White]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 25 Mar 2009 13:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Money losers of 2008: Billionaires who lost billions this year]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/12/24/money-losers-of-2008-billionaires-who-lost-billions-this-year/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/12/24/money-losers-of-2008-billionaires-who-lost-billions-this-year/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/12/24/money-losers-of-2008-billionaires-who-lost-billions-this-year/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/goog/" rel="tag">Google (GOOG)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/msft/" rel="tag">Microsoft (MSFT)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/aapl/" rel="tag">Apple Inc (AAPL)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/dell/" rel="tag">Dell (DELL)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/ebay/" rel="tag">eBay (EBAY)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/amzn/" rel="tag">Amazon.com (AMZN)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/brk-a/" rel="tag">Berkshire Hathaway (BRK.A)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/shld/" rel="tag">Sears Holdings (SHLD)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/aig/" rel="tag">Amer Intl Group (AIG)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/orcl/" rel="tag">Oracle Corp (ORCL)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/nws/" rel="tag">News Corp'B' (NWS)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/bx/" rel="tag">Blackstone Group L.P (BX)</a></p><p><em><img alt="" hspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/12/money-losers-6-billionaires-200cm121808.jpg" align="right" vspace="4" border="1" />This post is part of our feature on <strong><a href="http://www.walletpop.com/specials/money-losers">Money Losers of 2008</a></strong>. See all 20.</em></p>
<p>There's no doubt about it -- times are tough. People are struggling to find work and to pay the bills as the value of their homes and savings dwindle. The poor get poorer, and the rich get richer. </p>
<p>Or do they? It's all relative, of course, but world's billionaires have been taking some big hits too. We take a look at <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/12/23/money-losers-of-2008-most-of-sheldon-adelsons-fortune-erased-b/">Sheldon Adelson</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/12/24/money-losers-of-2008-kirk-kerkorian-takes-hits-from-mgm-and-for/">Kirk Kerkorian</a>, and <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/12/24/money-losers-of-2008-falling-demand-for-steel-melts-lakshmi-mi/">Lakshmi Mittal</a> in their own separate posts, but here are some other billionaires who have lost billions this year (courtesy of <em><a href="http://www.forbes.com/2008/12/16/billionaires-adelson-casino-biz-billies-cz_dg_1216biggestlosers.html">Forbes</a></em> and <a href="http://businesssheet.alleyinsider.com/loser"><em>Business Sheet</em></a>).</p>
<ul>
    <li>Brothers <strong>Anil</strong> and <strong>Mukesh Ambani</strong> of India's private conglomerate Reliance lost $32.5 billion and $28.2 billion, respectively. </li>
    <li><strong>Warren Buffett</strong>, the Sage of Omaha, lost $16.5 billion. Shares of <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/berkshire-hathaway-inc-cl-a/brk.a/nys">Berkshire Hathaway Inc.</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/berkshire-hathaway-inc-cl-a/brk.a/nys">BRK.A</a>) are down about 32% since the beginning of the year. </li>
    <li><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/microsoft-corporation/msft/nas">Microsoft </a>(NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/microsoft-corporation/msft/nas">MSFT</a>) founders <strong>Bill Gates</strong> and <strong>Paul Allen</strong> lost $12.3 billion and $2.6 billion, respectively, while CEO <strong>Steve Balmer</strong> lost $6.5 billion. Shares of Microsoft are down 46% since the beginning of the year. </li>
    <li><strong>Larry Page</strong> and <strong>Sergey Brin</strong>, cofounders of <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/google-inc/goog/nas">Google Inc.</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/google-inc/goog/nas">GOOG</a>), lost $11.9 billion and $11.7 billion, respectively, and CEO <strong>Eric Schmidt</strong> lost $3.8 billion. The share price of Google has fallen 55% since the beginning of the year. </li>
    <li><strong>Larry Ellison</strong>, CEO of <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/oracle-corporation/orcl/nas">Oracle Corp.</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/oracle-corporation/orcl/nas">ORCL</a>), lost $8.2 billion. Shares of Oracle are down 21% since the beginning of the year. </li>
    <li>Media maven <strong>Sumner Redstone</strong> lost $7.2 billion. Shares of his private investment firm National Amusements fell 70% this year. </li>
</ul><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/12/24/money-losers-of-2008-billionaires-who-lost-billions-this-year/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Money losers of 2008: Billionaires who lost billions this year</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/12/24/money-losers-of-2008-billionaires-who-lost-billions-this-year/">Money losers of 2008: Billionaires who lost billions this year</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 24 Dec 2008 12:30:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/12/24/money-losers-of-2008-billionaires-who-lost-billions-this-year/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1403111/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/12/24/money-losers-of-2008-billionaires-who-lost-billions-this-year/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>AAPL</category><category>AIG</category><category>Amazon</category><category>Amazon.com</category><category>AMZN</category><category>Anil Ambani</category><category>Apple</category><category>BAC</category><category>Bank of America</category><category>Berkshire Hathaway</category><category>bilionaires</category><category>Bill Gates</category><category>Blackstone Group</category><category>BRK.A</category><category>BX</category><category>Carl Icahn</category><category>Carnival</category><category>CCL</category><category>Charles Ergen</category><category>Citigroup</category><category>Clemmie Dixon Spangler</category><category>Dan Duncan</category><category>DELL</category><category>DISH</category><category>Dish Network</category><category>eBay</category><category>Eddie Lampert</category><category>EPD</category><category>Eric Schmidt</category><category>Ernest Randy</category><category>Ernest Stempel</category><category>featured</category><category>Garmin</category><category>Gary Burrell</category><category>GOOG</category><category>Google</category><category>GRMN</category><category>Hank Greenberg</category><category>Jeff Bezos</category><category>Jerry Yang</category><category>Larry Ellison</category><category>Larry Page</category><category>Leslie Gonda</category><category>Michael Dell</category><category>Micky Arison</category><category>Microsoft</category><category>Min Kao</category><category>Money Losers 2008</category><category>MSFT</category><category>Mukeshi Ambani</category><category>News Corp.</category><category>NWS</category><category>Oleg Deripaska</category><category>Oracle</category><category>ORCL</category><category>Paul Allen</category><category>Pierre Omidyar</category><category>Rupert Murdoch</category><category>Sanford Weill</category><category>Sears</category><category>Sergey Brin</category><category>SHLD</category><category>Stephen Schwarzman</category><category>Steve Balmer</category><category>Steve Jobs</category><category>Steve Wynn</category><category>Sumner Redstone</category><category>Wachovia</category><category>Warren Buffett</category><category>WB</category><category>WYNN</category><category>Wynn Resorts</category><category>Yahoo</category><category>YHOO</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Trey Thoelcke]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 24 Dec 2008 12:30:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[The world's 10 biggest losers]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/26/the-worlds-10-biggest-losers/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/26/the-worlds-10-biggest-losers/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/26/the-worlds-10-biggest-losers/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/goog/" rel="tag">Google (GOOG)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/brk-a/" rel="tag">Berkshire Hathaway (BRK.A)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/shld/" rel="tag">Sears Holdings (SHLD)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/orcl/" rel="tag">Oracle Corp (ORCL)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/lvs/" rel="tag">Las Vegas Sands (LVS)</a></p><p>As we begin the trek to grandmother's house, it's worth reflecting on what we have to be thankful for. The answer? When it comes to money, most of us have a lot less than we did a year ago. But for those of you who have your health and your families to comfort you, it will cost much less to buy the gasoline to visit than it would have in July. And as you're driving to visit those families -- consider how much less you lost in the last year than the world's 10 biggest losers.</p>
<p>According to the web site, <a href="http://businesssheet.alleyinsider.com/">The Business Sheet</a>, those unfortunate people suffered a mind-boggling $176 billion in lost stock market value in the last 12 months. It turns out that 52% of the losses were suffered by three executives based in India. Here they are:</p>
<ul>
    <li><strong>Anil Ambani <u><a href="http://businesssheet.alleyinsider.com/loser-1-anil-ambani">- $32.5 billion</a></u></strong>. Ambani heads Reliance Communications that invested $500 million in Dreamworks earlier this year. </li>
    <li><strong>Lakshmi Mittal</strong> <strong><u>- $30.5 billion.</u></strong> Mittal heads ArcelorMittal which has suffered from a decline in the price of steel. </li>
    <li><strong>Mukesh Ambani <u>-$28.2 billion</u></strong> is Anil's brother and controls Reliance Industries, a petrochemical manufacturer.</li>
</ul>
<br />These are some other folks that make The Business Sheet's list:<br />
<ul>
    <li><strong>Sheldon Adelson <u>-$30 billion</u></strong>. I did consulting work for Adelson about 22 years ago and he is quite a character. His <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/las-vegas-sands-corp/lvs/nys">Las Vegas Sands</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/las-vegas-sands-corp/lvs/nys">LVS</a>) casino is suffering from the economic slowdown and he's had some trouble with debt. </li>
    <li><strong>Warren Buffett <u>-$13.6 billion</u></strong>. As I <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/20/buffett-is-12-poorer-than-yesterday/">posted</a>, Buffett's <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/berkshire-hathaway-inc-cl-a/brk.a/nys">Berkshire Hathaway</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/berkshire-hathaway-inc-cl-a/brk.a/nys">BRK.A</a>) has had some problems this year. </li>
</ul><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/26/the-worlds-10-biggest-losers/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>The world's 10 biggest losers</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/26/the-worlds-10-biggest-losers/">The world's 10 biggest losers</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 26 Nov 2008 17:05:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/26/the-worlds-10-biggest-losers/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1383990/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/26/the-worlds-10-biggest-losers/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>anil ambani</category><category>AnilAmbani</category><category>eddie lampert</category><category>EddieLampert</category><category>kirk kerkorian</category><category>KirkKerkorian</category><category>lakshmi mittal</category><category>LakshmiMittal</category><category>larry page</category><category>LarryPage</category><category>mukesh ambani</category><category>MukeshAmbani</category><category>sergey brin</category><category>SergeyBrin</category><category>sheldon adelson</category><category>SheldonAdelson</category><category>steve ballmer</category><category>SteveBallmer</category><category>warrren buffet</category><category>WarrrenBuffet</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Peter Cohan]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 26 Nov 2008 17:05:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Google (GOOG): The stupidity of the $1 salary]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/03/26/google-goog-the-stupidity-of-the-1-salary/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/03/26/google-goog-the-stupidity-of-the-1-salary/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/03/26/google-goog-the-stupidity-of-the-1-salary/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/sec-filings/" rel="tag">SEC Filings</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/management/" rel="tag">Management</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/goog/" rel="tag">Google (GOOG)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/aapl/" rel="tag">Apple Inc (AAPL)</a></p><p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/03/dollar-bill.jpg"  alt="" />A look at the new <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/google-inc/goog/nas">Google</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/google-inc/goog/nas">GOOG</a>) proxy <a href="http://money.cnn.com/2008/03/25/technology/google_compensation.ap/index.htm?section=money_topstories">shows that</a> founders Sergey Brin and Larry Page were each paid $1 for their work in 2007. Steve Jobs has done the same thing at <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/apple-inc/aapl/nas">Apple</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/apple-inc/aapl/nas">AAPL</a>). Of course, the two Google founders each have about $13 billion in stock and Jobs is also rich as Croesus.</p>
<p>The $1 salary is a bit of theater. It says that the compensation of senior management will be built on the stock price. If it does not do well, all we have is that $1.</p>
<p>The gesture does not even fool idiots when the share price is down and the management is wealthy. Even with Google off from a high of $747 to its current price of $450, Brin and Page retain wealth which is beyond most investors' wildest dreams. The level of their salaries has no meaning.</p>
<p>Google shareholders would be much happier if Brin and Page plundered the company for tens of millions in compensation provided that they get the stock back over $700. The $1 salary is just an insult.</p>
<p><em>Douglas A. McIntyre is an editor at 247wallst.com. </em></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/03/26/google-goog-the-stupidity-of-the-1-salary/">Google (GOOG): The stupidity of the $1 salary</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 26 Mar 2008 04:42:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://money.cnn.com/2008/03/25/technology/google_compensation.ap/index.htm?section=money_topstories>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/03/26/google-goog-the-stupidity-of-the-1-salary/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1149339/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/03/26/google-goog-the-stupidity-of-the-1-salary/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>executive pay</category><category>ExecutivePay</category><category>goog</category><category>larry page</category><category>LarryPage</category><category>sergey brin</category><category>SergeyBrin</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Douglas McIntyre]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 26 Mar 2008 04:42:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Google's Brin speaks out about a combined Micro-Hoo]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/02/25/googles-brin-speaks-out-about-a-combined-micro-hoo/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/02/25/googles-brin-speaks-out-about-a-combined-micro-hoo/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/02/25/googles-brin-speaks-out-about-a-combined-micro-hoo/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/competitive-strategy/" rel="tag">Competitive Strategy</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/goog/" rel="tag">Google (GOOG)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/msft/" rel="tag">Microsoft (MSFT)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/yhoo/" rel="tag">Yahoo! (YHOO)</a></p><a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/ehud/17451790/"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/02/17451790_11afca2b31_m.jpg" alt="" /></a>We know that <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/google-inc-cl-a/goog/nas">Google Inc.</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/google-inc-cl-a/goog/nas">GOOG</a>) exec David Drummond has said that <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/02/03/google-criticizes-microsoft-over-yahoo-bid">he's not fond</a> of the proposed acquisition of <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/yahoo-inc/yhoo/nas">Yahoo! Inc.</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/yahoo-inc/yhoo/nas">YHOO</a>) by software giant <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/microsoft-corporation/msft/nas">Microsoft Corp.</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/microsoft-corporation/msft/nas">MSFT</a>). Drummond indicated that he believes Microsoft could influence the internet too much like it has done in the PC market. What about other Google execs -- what do they think?<br /><br />Google <a href="http://www.news.com/8301-10784_3-9876644-7.html">co-founder Sergey Brin</a> took a potshot last week (although indirectly) by saying "The Internet has evolved from open standards, having a diversity of companies. And when you start to have companies that control the operating system, control the browsers, they really tie up the top Web sites, and can be used to manipulate stuff in various ways. I think that's unnerving." There you have it, Microsoft. You may soon be unnerving the world's largest search company. <br /><br />This really is not a new argument, but it's typical of Google, which tends to believe in openness for all Internet users instead of locked-down and proprietary solutions controlled by select companies. Although Microsoft has lost court battles claiming it used illegal, monopolistic tactics to build its company in many ways, nothing of the sort has tarnished Google's doors yet. It simply built the best solution possible, and what do you know -- customers flocked to it. It'll be that position that Google takes as it continues planting the seeds of doubt and discontent as the <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/02/01/google-benefits-from-microsoft-yahoo/">Micro-Hoo situation continues to evolve</a>.<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/02/25/googles-brin-speaks-out-about-a-combined-micro-hoo/">Google's Brin speaks out about a combined Micro-Hoo</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 25 Feb 2008 12:45:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.news.com/8301-10784_3-9876644-7.html>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/02/25/googles-brin-speaks-out-about-a-combined-micro-hoo/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1123221/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/02/25/googles-brin-speaks-out-about-a-combined-micro-hoo/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>GOOG</category><category>Google</category><category>Microhoo</category><category>Microsoft</category><category>MSFT</category><category>Sergey Brin</category><category>SergeyBrin</category><category>Yahoo</category><category>YHOO</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Brian White]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 25 Feb 2008 12:45:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Google heads to the moon]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/02/22/google-heads-to-the-moon/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/02/22/google-heads-to-the-moon/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/02/22/google-heads-to-the-moon/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/launches/" rel="tag">Launches</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/goog/" rel="tag">Google (GOOG)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/marketing-and-advertising/" rel="tag">Marketing and Advertising</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/12/google-goog-lunar-xprize.jpg" />Already dominating life here on earth, <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/google-inc/goog/nas">Google Inc.</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/google-inc/goog/nas">GOOG</a>) is now making plans to conquer outer space too. <br /><br />Google announced the <a href="http://www.googlelunarxprize.org/">Google Lunar X Prize</a> yesterday at its headquarters in Mountain View, California. The competition offers $30 million in prizes to anyone who can get a robot to the moon and send back pictures and other data. <br /><br />According to an <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2008/02/22/business/22space.html">article</a> in Friday's <em>New York Times</em>, 10 teams have joined the competition. The teams include robotic experts from American universities, an Italian aerospace company, the Aeronautics and Cosmonautics Romanian Association, and a group of engineers who will work together online.<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/02/22/google-heads-to-the-moon/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Google heads to the moon</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/02/22/google-heads-to-the-moon/">Google heads to the moon</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 22 Feb 2008 11:25:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.nytimes.com/2008/02/22/business/22space.html>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/02/22/google-heads-to-the-moon/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1121919/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/02/22/google-heads-to-the-moon/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>featured</category><category>GOOG</category><category>google</category><category>Google Lunar X Prize</category><category>GoogleLunarXPrize</category><category>moon</category><category>Sergey Brin</category><category>SergeyBrin</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Michael Rainey]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 22 Feb 2008 11:25:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Google (GOOG) trio scores another jet plus exclusive airport access]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/10/12/google-goog-trio-scores-another-jet-plus-exclusive-airport-acc/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/10/12/google-goog-trio-scores-another-jet-plus-exclusive-airport-acc/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/10/12/google-goog-trio-scores-another-jet-plus-exclusive-airport-acc/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/insiders/" rel="tag">Insiders</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/goog/" rel="tag">Google (GOOG)</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/10/goog-plane-boeing.jpg" />With <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/google-inc/goog/nas">Google, Inc.</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/google-inc/goog/nas">GOOG</a>) shares at an all-time high (giving the search leader a ridiculous <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/10/11/game-changer-google-hits-200-billion-market-cap-is-500-bil/">$200 billion market cap</a>), the triumvirate leadership of founders Larry Page and Sergey Brin and CEO Eric Schmidt have set their collective eyes on yet another jumbo jet to cruise around the world in.<br /><br />This situation sounds like 1999-era dot-com exuberance madness, but the market has pushed Google to insane levels and the company has billions of cash on hand for anything it needs, as in acquisitions, global computer server farms and huge jets.<br /><br />In addition to the new jet purchased under the auspices of a company names H211, LLC, the three Google leader have scored an <a href="http://www.news.com/8301-10784_3-9795856-7.html">exclusive agreement for airport access at Moffett Field</a>, including the rights for four planes in total. Moffett Field is very close to Google's Mountain View, California headquarters. <br /><br />The current staple of planes owned and operated by Google's seemingly-eccentric leadership trio includes two Gulfstream Vs, a Boeing 767, and the new Boeing 757. Are other Silicon Valley CEOs jealous? Most likely, yes. But, at least the Google folks are buying 'green' credits to offset the jet fuel they'll be expunging. As a Google shareholder, do you think the company needs a small jet army like this?<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/10/12/google-goog-trio-scores-another-jet-plus-exclusive-airport-acc/">Google (GOOG) trio scores another jet plus exclusive airport access</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 12 Oct 2007 13:55:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.news.com/8301-10784_3-9795856-7.html>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/10/12/google-goog-trio-scores-another-jet-plus-exclusive-airport-acc/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1011119/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/10/12/google-goog-trio-scores-another-jet-plus-exclusive-airport-acc/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Boeing</category><category>corporate jet</category><category>CorporateJet</category><category>Eric Schmidt</category><category>EricSchmidt</category><category>GOOG</category><category>Google</category><category>Larry Page</category><category>LarryPage</category><category>Moffett airport</category><category>MoffettAirport</category><category>Sergey Brin</category><category>SergeyBrin</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Brian White]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 12 Oct 2007 13:55:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Option update: GOOG straddle suggests risk into earnings per share as GOOG at record]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/10/08/option-update-10-8-07-goog-straddle-suggests-risk-into-earnings/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/10/08/option-update-10-8-07-goog-straddle-suggests-risk-into-earnings/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/10/08/option-update-10-8-07-goog-straddle-suggests-risk-into-earnings/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/analyst-reports/" rel="tag">Analyst Reports</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/management/" rel="tag">Management</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/goog/" rel="tag">Google (GOOG)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/employees/" rel="tag">Employees</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/gps/" rel="tag">Gap Inc (GPS)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/options/" rel="tag">Options</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/entrepreneurs/" rel="tag">Entrepreneurs</a></p><p><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/google-inc/goog/nas"><strong><img align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/10/flywall_final_logo_mini.gif" alt="" /></strong>Google Inc</a>. (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/google-inc/goog/nas">GOOG</a>) recently trading up $15.29 to $609.20. <br /></p>
<p><br />GOOG is expected to report earnings per share (EPS) on October 18th. GOOG October at the money 580 straddle is priced at $32.10. GOOG October option implied volatility of 38 is above its 26-week average of 27 according to Track Data, suggesting larger risk.</p>
<p><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/gap-inc-del/gps/nys">The Gap Inc.</a> (NYSE<strong>: </strong><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/gap-inc-del/gps/nys">GP</a><strong><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/gap-inc-del/gps/nys">S</a>) </strong>CEO Glenn Murphy hosted a meeting with analysts on October 5th. <br /></p>
<p>Smith Barney says "Mr. Murphy is focused on making the company gets an adequate return on its investments. This includes a focus on the expense of the business. We suspect there will be continued focus on moderating the cost structure and assessing various cost components, including marketing. We think the real estate portfolio is under review." GPS over all option implied volatility of 31 is near its 26-week average according to Track Data, suggesting flat price risk. </p>
<p><br /><em>Daily options Update is provided by Stock Specialist Paul Foster of theflyonthewall.com.</em></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/10/08/option-update-10-8-07-goog-straddle-suggests-risk-into-earnings/">Option update: GOOG straddle suggests risk into earnings per share as GOOG at record</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 08 Oct 2007 16:15:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/10/08/option-update-10-8-07-goog-straddle-suggests-risk-into-earnings/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1008303/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/10/08/option-update-10-8-07-goog-straddle-suggests-risk-into-earnings/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>1600 amphitheatre parkway</category><category>1600AmphitheatreParkway</category><category>94053</category><category>ads web</category><category>AdsWeb</category><category>adwords</category><category>Banana Republic</category><category>BananaRepublic</category><category>EPS</category><category>Eric schmidt</category><category>EricSchmidt</category><category>Fisher family</category><category>FisherFamily</category><category>Gap</category><category>Gap Stores</category><category>GapStores</category><category>Glenn Murphy</category><category>GlennMurphy</category><category>google.com</category><category>gPhone</category><category>inthenews</category><category>Jobs at Google</category><category>JobsAtGoogle</category><category>large move</category><category>LargeMove</category><category>Larry Page</category><category>LarryPage</category><category>Laszlo Brink</category><category>LaszloBrink</category><category>Mountain view CA</category><category>MountainViewCa</category><category>Old Navy</category><category>OldNavy</category><category>online advertising</category><category>OnlineAdvertising</category><category>option implied volatility</category><category>Piperlime</category><category>search</category><category>Sergey Brin</category><category>SergeyBrin</category><category>silicon valley</category><category>SiliconValley</category><category>Smith Barney</category><category>SmithBarney</category><category>Victoria Secret</category><category>VictoriaSecret</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Paul Foster]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 08 Oct 2007 16:15:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Google co-founder: Facebook may stay independent]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/07/13/google-co-founder-facebook-may-stay-independent/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/07/13/google-co-founder-facebook-may-stay-independent/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/07/13/google-co-founder-facebook-may-stay-independent/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/deals/" rel="tag">Deals</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/industry/" rel="tag">Industry</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/competitive-strategy/" rel="tag">Competitive Strategy</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/goog/" rel="tag">Google (GOOG)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/yhoo/" rel="tag">Yahoo! (YHOO)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/nws/" rel="tag">News Corp'B' (NWS)</a></p><p>Sergey Brin, one of the founders of <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/google-inc-cl-a/goog/nas">Google</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/google-inc-cl-a/goog/nas">GOOG</a>), <a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/ousiv/idUSN1232758520070713">told reporters</a> that he would not be surprised if <a href="http://www.facebook.com/">Facebook</a> remained independent. He also pointed out that the rise of social networks could be good for the big search company: "Social networks are creating lots and lots of content ... and that's more for us to search." Facebook now has almost 30 million active members, putting it behind <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/news-corporation/nws/nys">News Corp's</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/news-corporation/nws/nys">NWS</a>) MySpace.</p>
<p>Brin's observation may simply be a factor of his own experience. Google could have been sold before it went public. Rumors are that <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/yahoo-inc/yhoo/nas">Yahoo!</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/yahoo-inc/yhoo/nas">YHOO</a>) had strong interest. Instead, Google watched the price of its stock go from under $100 at the time of its IPO to $545 now. With a market cap of $170 billion, the founders have become wildly wealthy.</p>
<p>The question, of course, is whether social networking is the next search. Can the newest rage on the internet pull in really large investments from online marketers? Did Rupert Murdoch steal MySpace for $565 million? </p>
<p>It may be a year or two before it is clear that independence is the right move for Facebook. By then its founders will either be very rich or full of regret.</p>
<p><em>Douglas A. McIntyre is a partner at 24/7 Wall St. </em></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/07/13/google-co-founder-facebook-may-stay-independent/">Google co-founder: Facebook may stay independent</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 13 Jul 2007 09:29:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/07/13/google-co-founder-facebook-may-stay-independent/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/939785/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/07/13/google-co-founder-facebook-may-stay-independent/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Facebook</category><category>Facebook vs. MySpace</category><category>FacebookVs.Myspace</category><category>Google</category><category>independent</category><category>MySpace</category><category>networking sites</category><category>NetworkingSites</category><category>Sergey Brin</category><category>SergeyBrin</category><category>social networking</category><category>SocialNetworking</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Douglas McIntyre]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 13 Jul 2007 09:29:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Yahoo! vs. Google: Battle of the Brands]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/04/08/yahoo-vs-google-battle-of-the-brands/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/04/08/yahoo-vs-google-battle-of-the-brands/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/04/08/yahoo-vs-google-battle-of-the-brands/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/products-and-services/" rel="tag">Products and Services</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/consumer-experience/" rel="tag">Consumer Experience</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/competitive-strategy/" rel="tag">Competitive Strategy</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/goog/" rel="tag">Google (GOOG)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/yhoo/" rel="tag">Yahoo! (YHOO)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/marketing-and-advertising/" rel="tag">Marketing and Advertising</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/battle-of-the-brands/" rel="tag">Battle of the Brands</a></p><p><em>This post is part of our <strong><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/battle-of-the-brands/">Battle of the Brands</a></strong> feature. Let us know which brand you prefer, and watch out for more Battle of the Brands posts.</em></p>
<p><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/yahoo-inc/yhoo/nas">Yahoo! Inc.</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/yahoo-inc/yhoo/nas">YHOO</a>) was the shining star of the internet bubble in 2000, just before the dot-com crash, and has managed to keep a huge customer base (tens of millions, if not hundreds of millions based on how you calculate it). Yahoo! customers are loyal apparently, even though Google has trounced Yahoo! in recent years in terms of search popularity and overall brand awareness. Like <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/goog/nys">Google Inc.</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/goog/nys">GOOG</a>), Yahoo! was founded by Stanford grad students, Jerry Yang and David Filo, so that information on the web could be more easily found back when the web was in its infancy -- 1995.</p>
<p>From 1995 to 2001, Yahoo! grew at a rapid clip, and then saw a downward spiral as advertising fortunes started collapsing at the same time Google's "text ad" advertising model started growing by leaps and bounds. It's pretty obvious by now that Yahoo!'s "one ad for all" approach grew quite stale (and so did its revenues) at the same time Google's "customer relevant" and unobtrusive ad model grew an an inversely proportionate rate. Yahoo! has made great strides on the comeback trail under five-year CEO and Hollywood expert Terry Semel, who has modeled Yahoo! as a "relationship builder" to customers (and gotten them to pay for certain services).</p>
<p><iframe border="0" align="right" src="http://webcenter.polls.aol.com/modular.jsp?template=1089&amp;view=108170&amp;pollId=108258&amp;channel=aol_us_moneynews1" frameborder="0" width="175" scrolling="no" height="125"></iframe>This model is quite opposed to Google's "tool-based" customer model that can't touch Yahoo!'s model for creating and enhancing actual relationships with paying customers, beyond just providing easy internet tools for customers while keeping that "relationship" quite distant. Yahoo! shares spit almost three years ago, but have remained between $29 and $44 per share since that time. By contrast, Google's shares have skyrocketed from $85 in August 2004 to over $460 today. In terms of an investment over the past five years, it's hard to draw a conclusion since Google has been publicly traded for less than three years, while Yahoo! has been traded for quite a bit longer than that.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/04/08/yahoo-vs-google-battle-of-the-brands/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Yahoo! vs. Google: Battle of the Brands</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/04/08/yahoo-vs-google-battle-of-the-brands/">Yahoo! vs. Google: Battle of the Brands</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Sun, 08 Apr 2007 09:10:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/04/08/yahoo-vs-google-battle-of-the-brands/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/858166/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/04/08/yahoo-vs-google-battle-of-the-brands/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>AdWords</category><category>Battle of the Brands</category><category>BattleOfTheBrands</category><category>Brian White</category><category>BrianWhite</category><category>David Filo</category><category>dot-com crash</category><category>Dot-comCrash</category><category>eBay</category><category>GOOG</category><category>Google</category><category>Google, Inc.</category><category>Google,Inc.</category><category>internet bubble</category><category>Jerry Yang</category><category>JerryYang</category><category>Larry Page</category><category>LarryPage</category><category>Microsoft</category><category>Sergey Brin</category><category>Terry Semel</category><category>TerrySemel</category><category>web search</category><category>WebSearch</category><category>world wide web</category><category>WorldWideWeb</category><category>Yahoo!</category><category>Yahoo, Inc.</category><category>Yahoo,Inc.</category><category>YHOO</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Brian White]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 08 Apr 2007 09:10:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[What's good for Google is good for California]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/01/08/whats-good-for-google-is-good-for-california/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/01/08/whats-good-for-google-is-good-for-california/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/01/08/whats-good-for-google-is-good-for-california/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/other-issues/" rel="tag">Other Issues</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/goog/" rel="tag">Google (GOOG)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/csco/" rel="tag">Cisco Systems (CSCO)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/hpq/" rel="tag">Hewlett-Packard (HPQ)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/orcl/" rel="tag">Oracle Corp (ORCL)</a></p><p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/01/google.gif" alt="" /></p>
<p>Back in the roaring 1990s, the state of California had little trouble with its budget. Basically, with the dot-com bull market, the state was reaping huge amounts of revenues from tax-paying tech millionaires who were exercising their stock options.</p>
<p>Well, according to a <a href="http://biz.yahoo.com/ap/070106/google_tax_infusion.html?.v=5">story</a> in the AP, it looks like history is repeating itself (kind of). In this case, it is mostly Google Inc. (NASDAQ:GOOG) that is providing the windfall.</p>
<p>In fact, 16 Google executives will account for $380 million in taxes for 2006 for California, of which about half comes from the co-founders Sergey Brin and Larry Page. </p>
<p>There will also be a boost from other comeback tech companies, such as Oracle Corp. (NASDAQ:ORCL), Hewlett-Packard (NYSE:HPQ), and Cisco Systems Inc. (NASDAQ:CSCO).</p>
<p>Yet, by far, Google will have the biggest impact. Actually, it has even offset the impact of the slowing real estate market.<br /><br /><em>Tom Taulli is the author of various books, including the Complete M&amp;A Handbook and the EDGAR-Online Guide to Decoding Financial Statements.</em></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/01/08/whats-good-for-google-is-good-for-california/">What's good for Google is good for California</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 08 Jan 2007 12:17:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/01/08/whats-good-for-google-is-good-for-california/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/731193/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/01/08/whats-good-for-google-is-good-for-california/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>California</category><category>cisco systems</category><category>CiscoSystems</category><category>google</category><category>hewlett-packard</category><category>larry page</category><category>LarryPage</category><category>oracle</category><category>sergey brin</category><category>SergeyBrin</category><category>Taxes</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tom Taulli]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 08 Jan 2007 12:17:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Weekly wrap-up for Google, October 16 to 20]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/10/21/weekly-wrap-up-for-google-october-16-to-20/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/10/21/weekly-wrap-up-for-google-october-16-to-20/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/10/21/weekly-wrap-up-for-google-october-16-to-20/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/after-the-bell/" rel="tag">After the Bell</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/earnings-reports/" rel="tag">Earnings Reports</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/products-and-services/" rel="tag">Products and Services</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/insiders/" rel="tag">Insiders</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/consumer-experience/" rel="tag">Consumer Experience</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/live-coverage/" rel="tag">Live Coverage</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/competitive-strategy/" rel="tag">Competitive Strategy</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/goog/" rel="tag">Google (GOOG)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/marketing-and-advertising/" rel="tag">Marketing and Advertising</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="right" alt="" id="vimage_1" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2006/10/goog-we102006.gif" />As expected, the overnight jump in Google shares based on the Q3 results the Internet company had after the bell Tuesday was nothing short of a home run -- literally. GOOG shares closed at around $426 on Thursday evening, and then 30 minutes later Google announced its latest quarterly results, and again the company easily passed consensus expectations for revenue and profit. <br /><br />Can anything stop Google? It seems like nothing can these days. Friday morning, GOOG shares opened to the tune of nearly $456 per share, quite a nice overnight jump. For the week, GOOG shares closed at $459.67, an impressive jump of $33.61 or 7.89% from Thursday's close.<br /><br />With Google gaining almost 8% overnight, the estimates from many analysts started their bull run again, with <a href="http://goog.bloggingstocks.com/2006/10/20/googles-target-price-climbing-up/">Jim Cramer bumping his estimate</a> from $500 to $560 per share along with Citigroup <a href="http://goog.bloggingstocks.com/2006/10/20/googles-target-price-climbing-up/">going for the jugular</a> and a $600 price target. Will Google get there? <br /><br />It seems that Google can do no wrong as it constantly blows past quarterly estimates again and again, while competitor Yahoo!'s shares are in the doghouse. And although Yahoo! remains the #1 overall visited web property, Google is catching up fast. <a href="http://www.youtube.com/press_room_entry?entry=HvfQ0AKougw">Adding Youtube</a> to the mix may mean Google will be the largest diversified Internet company in terms of eyeballs very soon. Now, if it can start making money with all those eyeballs beyond search advertising, the sky won't even be the limit. Stay tuned for more quarters and we'll all see.<br /><br />Here are a few blogging highlights for Google from this past week:<br /><br /><a href="http://goog.bloggingstocks.com/2006/10/19/liveblogging-googles-third-quarter-2006-earnings/">Google blows past Q3 earnings expectations, a I liveblog the event</a><br /><br /><a href="http://goog.bloggingstocks.com/2006/10/19/googles-latest-blog-mishap-points-to-possibly-neglected-service/">Is Google neglecting some of its web properties these days?</a><br /><br /><a href="http://goog.bloggingstocks.com/2006/10/18/the-power-of-hype-and-large-announcements/">UTube.com traffic spikes when Google-Youtube announcement hits hype fever pitch</a><br /><br /><a href="http://goog.bloggingstocks.com/2006/10/17/google-goes-solar/">Google goes solar at corporate HQ in a lesson on how to go green big-time</a><br /><br /><a href="http://goog.bloggingstocks.com/2006/10/14/big-media-goes-after-google-with-unclean-hands/">Big media chomping at the bit to go after Google now that it's acquired Youtube</a><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/10/21/weekly-wrap-up-for-google-october-16-to-20/">Weekly wrap-up for Google, October 16 to 20</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Sat, 21 Oct 2006 10:54:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://finance.aol.com/quotes/google-inc-cl-a/goog/nas>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/10/21/weekly-wrap-up-for-google-october-16-to-20/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/688153/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/10/21/weekly-wrap-up-for-google-october-16-to-20/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>GOOG</category><category>Google</category><category>Google, Inc.</category><category>Google,Inc.</category><category>Larry Page</category><category>LarryPage</category><category>Sergey Brin</category><category>SergeyBrin</category><category>Yahoo!</category><category>YHOO</category><category>YYOO</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Brian White]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 21 Oct 2006 10:54:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Google buys a garage]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/10/01/google-buys-a-garage/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/10/01/google-buys-a-garage/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/10/01/google-buys-a-garage/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/goog/" rel="tag">Google (GOOG)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/hpq/" rel="tag">Hewlett-Packard (HPQ)</a></p><p><img height="122" alt="google" hspace="4" src="http://static.flickr.com/82/257949491_d1ab7be031_m.jpg" width="240" align="right" vspace="4" border="0" /></p>
<p>A garage? Has <a href="http://www.google.com">Google</a> Inc. (NASDAQ:GOOG) finally lost it?</p>
<p>Not really. You see, when Larry Page and Sergey Brin built Google, they rented out a garage (the company was incorporated on September 7, 1998). It was about 1,900 square feet - and, of course, ultimately turned into a $125 billion empire.</p>
<p>It's something that happens with some frequency in Silicon Valley. For example, in 1939, Bill Hewlett and Dave Packard started their legendary company from a modest garage (Hewlett-Packard Company, NYSE:HPQ, now owns it).</p>
<p>As for the Google garage, it is based in Menlo Park and will now become a Silicon Valley landmark of sorts. Oh, there is even a hot tub on the property. But, apparently, the co-founders did work tirelessly on their search engine.</p>
<p>On the Google <a href="http://www.google.com/corporate/history.html">corporate site</a>, you can get some info on the early history. </p>
<p><em>The office offered several big advantages, including a washer and dryer and a hot tub. It also provided a parking space for the first employee hired by the new company: Craig Silverstein, now Google's director of technology.</em></p>
<p><em>Already Google.com, still in beta, was answering 10,000 search queries each day.</em> </p>
<p><em>Tom Taulli is the author of various books, including the Complete M&amp;A Handbook and operates InvestorOffering.com.</em></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/10/01/google-buys-a-garage/">Google buys a garage</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Sun, 01 Oct 2006 19:59:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/10/01/google-buys-a-garage/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/677917/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/10/01/google-buys-a-garage/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Google Garage</category><category>GoogleGarage</category><category>Larry Page</category><category>LarryPage</category><category>Sergey Brin</category><category>SergeyBrin</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tom Taulli]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 01 Oct 2006 19:59:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA["Google Boys" Boeing jet lawsuit settled -- in part]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/08/11/google-boys-boeing-jet-lawsuit-settled-in-part/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/08/11/google-boys-boeing-jet-lawsuit-settled-in-part/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/08/11/google-boys-boeing-jet-lawsuit-settled-in-part/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/deals/" rel="tag">Deals</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/rumors/" rel="tag">Rumors</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/insiders/" rel="tag">Insiders</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/internet/" rel="tag">Internet</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/goog/" rel="tag">Google (GOOG)</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2006/08/767_topshot_375.jpg" id="vimage_1" alt="" />After having followed this rather bizarre story for a few months now, it seems that Google co-founders Larry Page and Sergey Brin have <a href="http://www.mercurynews.com/mld/mercurynews/business/15250219.htm">settled with an aircraft restorer that was hired by the pair</a>. The Google co-founders hired renowned Oklahoma aircraft desginer and restorer Les Jennings to customize a Boeing 767 that the pair bought for personal use. <br /><br />The requests from the pair delved into the odd and mysterious (and expensive), from <em>hammocks swinging from the ceiling</em> to presidential-quality state rooms and dining rooms for the pair and Google CEO Eric Schmidt.<br /><br />Both Page and Brin accused <a href="http://www.mercurynews.com/mld/mercurynews/business/15250219.htm">Jennings of leaking secret details</a> about the Boeing plane to the press, in breach of a court-ordered confidentiality clause, and they took Jennings to court over this. As of today this suit has been dropped by Brin and Page, although the original breach of contract suit will still press forward. <br /><br />The original suit accused Jennings of not completing requests on time as per the contracted schedule. Apparently this will all press on now as planned, even though the charges against Jennings for actually talking about the plane publicly have now been dismissed.<br /><br /><font size="-0"><font size="2" face="Arial" color="#000000"><a onclick="return top.js.OpenExtLink(window,event,this)" href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/04/25/about-the-stock-bloggers-brian-white/" target="_blank"><em>Brian White</em></a><em> has worked in various executive positions in technology and telecommunications and now focuses on editing and writing.</em></font></font><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/08/11/google-boys-boeing-jet-lawsuit-settled-in-part/">"Google Boys" Boeing jet lawsuit settled -- in part</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 11 Aug 2006 13:01:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.mercurynews.com/mld/mercurynews/business/15250219.htm>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/08/11/google-boys-boeing-jet-lawsuit-settled-in-part/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/653471/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/08/11/google-boys-boeing-jet-lawsuit-settled-in-part/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Google Jet</category><category>GoogleJet</category><category>Larry Page</category><category>LarryPage</category><category>Leslie Jennings</category><category>LeslieJennings</category><category>Sergey Brin</category><category>SergeyBrin</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Brian White]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 11 Aug 2006 13:01:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Google vs. Yahoo!: a look at Q2 results]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/07/24/google-vs-yahoo-a-look-at-q2-results/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/07/24/google-vs-yahoo-a-look-at-q2-results/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/07/24/google-vs-yahoo-a-look-at-q2-results/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/earnings-reports/" rel="tag">Earnings Reports</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/good-news/" rel="tag">Good news</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/products-and-services/" rel="tag">Products and Services</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/consumer-experience/" rel="tag">Consumer Experience</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/internet/" rel="tag">Internet</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/competitive-strategy/" rel="tag">Competitive Strategy</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/goog/" rel="tag">Google (GOOG)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/yhoo/" rel="tag">Yahoo! (YHOO)</a></p><p><img id="vimage_1" alt="blue skies for google" hspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2006/07/blueskies_forgoogle.jpg" align="right" vspace="4" border="0" />From last week's feeding frenzy over results from the Internet and computer behemoths -- Google, Yahoo! and Microsoft -- let's focus in on the difference between the two most direct competitors from that bunch (whether the companies admit it or not): <a href="http://www.ineedhits.com/free-tools/blog/2006/07/googles-and-yahoos-results-vastly.aspx">Google and Yahoo!</a> Yahoo's earnings were, by all accounts, excellent. </p>
<p>I love it when the quarter is described only as "meeting analyst expectations," who cares? A company's results should be determined by more fundamental measures such as competitive gains, profit gains, growth (realistic), and EPS: not by "analyst expectations." But, I digress. </p>
<p>Yahoo! profit dipped from last year, mostly because the company sold quite a few Google shares in the year-ago period to make the quarter shine. Revenue increased 26% to land at $1.58 billion. Result: YHOO shares fell nearly 18% right after the announcement. Oh my -- as always, <em>the market lost its head</em> (not sure if it has one).<br /><br />Google results were stellar and blew away "analyst estimates" by every measure -- $721 million in profit on sales of $2.46 billion. With a $2.33 EPS figure and a 77% revenue increase, Google's second quarter just upped the bar once again for the search giant. Result: GOOG shares fell almost all day before the earnings were released and slowly gained in after-hours trading. I still feel that Google shares are overvalued, but the company does continue to have <a href="http://www.ineedhits.com/free-tools/blog/2006/07/googles-and-yahoos-results-vastly.aspx">incredibly impressive quarters</a>. Will Google's sky slowly fall one of these quarters? Hard to say, but if it continues to give customers what they want and serve ads that work for the customer, Google's sky may just remain blue for a long while.</p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/07/24/google-vs-yahoo-a-look-at-q2-results/">Google vs. Yahoo!: a look at Q2 results</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 24 Jul 2006 12:12:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.ineedhits.com/free-tools/blog/2006/07/googles-and-yahoos-results-vastly.aspx>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/07/24/google-vs-yahoo-a-look-at-q2-results/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/646249/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/07/24/google-vs-yahoo-a-look-at-q2-results/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Eric Schmidt</category><category>EricSchmidt</category><category>GOOG</category><category>Google</category><category>Larry Page</category><category>LarryPage</category><category>Sergey Brin</category><category>SergeyBrin</category><category>Terry Semel</category><category>TerrySemel</category><category>Yahoo!</category><category>YHOO</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Brian White]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 24 Jul 2006 12:12:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Google guys' mile-high party plane hits turbulence]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/07/07/google-guys-mile-high-party-plane-hits-turbulence/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/07/07/google-guys-mile-high-party-plane-hits-turbulence/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/07/07/google-guys-mile-high-party-plane-hits-turbulence/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/bad-news/" rel="tag">Bad News</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/insiders/" rel="tag">Insiders</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/law/" rel="tag">Law</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/internet/" rel="tag">Internet</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/goog/" rel="tag">Google (GOOG)</a></p><p><img id="vimage_1" alt="" hspace="4" src="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2006/07/hammock.jpg" align="right" vspace="4" border="0" />Google founders Larry Page and Sergey Brin were hoping to be throwing some massive mile-high parties by now.&nbsp;Instead their party plane is weighed down&nbsp;by lawsuits.</p>
<p>According to <a href="http://articles.news.aol.com/business/_a/lawsuits-fly-over-google-founders-big/20060707090909990001">a story in today's <em>Wall Street Journal</em></a>, Page and Brin's private jet is the subject of multiple lawsuits over its renovations -- originally budgeted to take ten months and cost $10 million. Page and Brin bought&nbsp;the used Boeing 767 widebody, designed to carry 180 passengers, as a private jet last year and promised to use it to take lots of their friends to places like Africa. </p>
<p>Hey, I might like to do things like that if I was a billionaire. Don't worry, shareholders. The tab for the jet is <em>not</em> on Google's books. This is a private plane, technically owned by&nbsp;a holding company called&nbsp;Blue City Holdings, LLC.</p>
<p>The plans for the plane reportedly were to include a&nbsp;"lounge" for Google Chief Exec Eric Schmidt, two "state rooms" for Brin and Page, a dining room, and additional seating for passengers (near the back, of course). Apparently designer Leslie Jennings had to accommodate strange requests from Brin and Page, including having hammocks installed hanging from the plane's ceiling. I'm imagining a tropical feeling at 35,000 feet right now, maybe. </p>
<p>Page and Brin had reportedly had a few spats over the size of the beds in their bedrooms. Schmidt reportedly&nbsp;had to step in and say, "Sergey, you can have whatever bed you want in your room; Larry, you can have whatever kind of bed you want in your bedroom." </p>
<p>&nbsp;</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/07/07/google-guys-mile-high-party-plane-hits-turbulence/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Google guys' mile-high party plane hits turbulence</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/07/07/google-guys-mile-high-party-plane-hits-turbulence/">Google guys' mile-high party plane hits turbulence</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 07 Jul 2006 10:34:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://articles.news.aol.com/business/_a/lawsuits-fly-over-google-founders-big/20060707090909990001>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/07/07/google-guys-mile-high-party-plane-hits-turbulence/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/640468/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/07/07/google-guys-mile-high-party-plane-hits-turbulence/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>GOOG</category><category>Google</category><category>Larry Page</category><category>LarryPage</category><category>Sergey Brin</category><category>SergeyBrin</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Brian White]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 07 Jul 2006 10:34:00 EST</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
