Advanced Micro Devices (AMD) soared to a new annual high Thursday morning after the chipmaker settled its antitrust case against rival Intel (INTC). Under the terms of the agreement, Intel will shell out $1.25 billion to AMD, and will abide by a new set of rules for conducting business. The pact also includes a renewed cross-license agreement between the two chip titans.

In prepared comments, AMD CEO Dirk Meyer called the settlement a game-changer. "We are optimistic that it will usher a new era for our industry," he said. "We recognize that it will take time for people to understand how the operating conditions in the processor business have changed. But make no mistake -- they have changed."

Credit-card concerns Visa, Inc. (NYSE: V) and MasterCard, Inc. (NYSE: MA) will be shelling out up to $2.75 billion to settle an antitrust suit with Discover Financial Services (NYSE: DFS). Specifically, MasterCard will pay Discover $862.5 million in the fourth quarter, while Visa will fork over $1.89 billion over the course of 2009. Following the release of the settlement's details, an analyst at Keefe, Bruyette & Woods is weighing in favorably on all three firms.

Sanjay Sakhrani called the news "a big win for Discover, as it provides an additional cushion to contend with the implications of a weaker U.S. economy." He expects the payments will add about $1.75 to Discover's earnings per share. However, he also cited the report as an upside catalyst for MasterCard and Visa, as it eliminates an overhang on shares of both companies -- an assertion supported by analyst Julio C. Quinteros, Jr., of Goldman Sachs.

Unfortunately, though, it's not all sunshine and rainbows in the credit-card group today. Morgan Stanley (NYSE: MS) has filed its own suit against Discover in New York State Supreme Court, alleging that it's entitled to a chunk of the $2.75-billion settlement. DFS was spun off from Morgan Stanley last year, and the latter company claims that it should receive a portion of the award under the terms of a special dividend agreement.

Not so fast, says Discover, which alleges that its parent company is in violation of their spinoff agreement, and "the amount of Morgan Stanley's special dividend is a matter of dispute." Morgan fired back that "there is absolutely no basis for Discover's claim that the agreement was breached." Stay tuned to see how this credit-card drama plays out -- in early trading, shares of all three credit card companies were higher.

Elizabeth Harrow is an analyst and financial writer in the research department at Schaeffer's Investment Research. She is featured in the video series Schaeffer's Daily Q&A on SchaeffersResearch.com.

Merck & Co (NYSE: MRK) shares are trading higher today after a Citi Investment Research analyst initiated coverage on the stock with a "Buy" rating, saying the company will benefit as rivals' drug patents expire in the coming year. This is despite news that came out today that Merck will soon start to send out almost $5B in Vioxx settlement checks. If you think that the stock won't fall by too much in the coming months, then now could be a good time to look at a bullish hedged trade on MRK.

After hitting a one-year high of $61.62 in December, the stock hit a one-year low of $34.49 in June. MRK opened this morning at $37.12. So far today the stock has hit a low of $36.60 and a high of $37.38. As of 1:05, MRK is trading at $37.38, up 42 cents(1.1%). The chart for MRK looks neutral and improving, while S&P gives the stock a neutral 3 Stars (out of 5) Hold rating.

For a bullish hedged play on this stock, I would consider an October bull-put credit spread below the $32.50 range. A bull-put credit spread is an options position that combines the purchase and sale of put options to hedge risk in case the stock doesn't do what you think but still leverage nice returns. For this particular trade, we will make a 16.3% return in just three months as long as MRK is above $32.50 at October expiration. Merck would have to fall by more than 13% before we would start to lose money. Learn more about this type of trade here.

MRK hasn't been below $34.50 at all in the past year and has shown support around $37 recently. This trade could be risky if the company's earnings (due out 7/21) disappoint, but even if that happens, this position could be protected by the support the stock might find at its year low, which is just below $35.

Brent Archer is an options analyst and writer at Investors Observer.

DISCLOSURE: Mr. Archer owns and/or controls diversified portfolios of long and short stock and option positions that may include holdings in companies he writes about. At publication time, Brent neither owns nor controls positions in MRK.

Mastercard (NYSE: MA) shares are trading higher today after the company announced it will pay competitor American Express (NYSE: AXP) up to $1.8 billion to settle an antitrust lawsuit. If you think that the stock won't fall by too much in the coming months, then now could be a good time to look at a bullish hedged trade on MA.

After hitting a one-year low of $120.00 in August, the stock hit a one-year high of $320.30 in May. MA opened this morning at $291.10. So far today the stock has hit a low of $290.10 and a high of $295.16. As of 12:40, MA is trading at $294.10, up $13.17 (4.9%). The chart for MA looks bullish but deteriorating, while S&P gives the stock a neutral 3 STARS (out of 5) hold rating.

For a bullish hedged play on this stock, I would consider an October bull-put credit spread below the $195 range. A bull-put credit spread is an options position that combines the purchase and sale of put options to hedge risk in case the stock doesn't do what you think but still leverage nice returns. For this particular trade, we will make a 6.4% return in four months as long as MA is above $195 at October expiration. Mastercard would have to fall by more than 33% before we would start to lose money. Learn more about this type of trade here.

BP plc (NYSE: BP) stock is falling this morning after the company announced this morning it has raised its claim fund to $2.13 billion for the 2005 explosion at its Texas City refinery. Lower oil futures are also hurting the stock. If you think this stock won't be rising too far in the coming months, then it could be a good time to look at a bearish hedged play on BP.

After hitting a one-year high of $79.77 in November, the stock hit a one-year low of $57.85 in January. This morning, BP opened at $63.2. So far today the stock has hit a low of $63.15 and a high of $63.99. As of 12:40, BP is trading at $63.90, down $0.73 (-1.1%). The chart for BP looks bearish but slightly improving while S&P gives BP a positive 4 STARS (out of 5) buy rating.

In what may end up being a net positive for eBay, albeit possibly an expensive one, a settlement has been reached in the litigation over patent infringement between eBay Inc. (NASDAQ: EBAY) and MercExchange. Financial figures of the settlement have not been disclosed, but a report from Computerworld indicates that eBay shall purchase the three patents which were the subject of the litigation, as well as a number of other related technologies and developments.

Mike Jacobson, eBay senior vice president and general counsel, was quoted by Computerworld as stating: "In addition to resolving the litigation, this settlement gives us access to additional intellectual property that will help improve and further secure our marketplaces." MercExchange founder and CEO Thomas Woolston, is quoted in the same report as stating: "It seemed like the right time to put it behind us."

In May of 2003, a jury in the case found eBay guilty of patent infringement and an injunction was sought and granted. However, in reviewing the US Court of Appeals decision, the Supreme Court unanimously derailed the long standing practice of issuing immediate injunctions in cases of intellectual property infringement, insisting that in the future, such injunctions must meet the requirements of a four-factor test.

Intel Corp. (NASDAQ: INTC) stock is dropping today after the company agreed to pay a $250 million settlement to Transmeta Corp (NASDAQ: TMTA) in a patent dispute. The terms include one initial payment of $150M plus annual $20M disbursements. If you think this stock won't be rising too far in the coming months, then it could be a good time to look at a bearish hedged play on INTC.

Intel stock has climbed over the past six months, hitting a one-year high of $26.98 last week. This morning, INTC opened at $26.33. So far today the stock has hit a low of $25.62 and a high of $26.39. As of 11:50, INTC is trading at $25.72, down $1.08 (-4.0%). The chart for INTC looks bullish and steady, while S&P gives the stock a positive 4 STARS (out of 5) buy rating.

For a bearish hedged play on this stock, I would consider a January bear-call credit spread above the $30 range. A bear-call credit spread is an options position that combines the purchase and sale of call options to hedge risk in case the stock doesn't do what you think but still leverage nice returns. For this particular trade, we will make a 4.3% return in 3 months as long as INTC is below $30 at January expiration. Intel would have to rise by more than 16% before we would start to lose money. Learn more about this type of trade here.

When Hewlett-Packard Co. (NYSE: HPQ) bought Mercury Interactive a little over a year ago, the company probably did not know that a pretty large settlement would be forthcoming from several pension funds that accused the now-subsidiary of stock-option backdating. The settlement reached earlier this week was $117.5 million, the largest of its kind.

The second-largest out-of-court settlement due to accusatory stock options backdating was $18 million, so the Mercury case seems unique: why such a large settlement here? HP knew of the shenanigans when it purchased the company in 2006, although the extent was probably unknown at the time. Even with the $4.5 billion purchase price and the $117.5 million settlement, Mercury was still a wise investment for HP moving forward, as it's already become a lucrative area within the company.

HP wants this situation and settlement to quickly be swept under the rug, which is no surprise. HP is shining these days under operational CEO Mark Hurd and from all appearances, can do little (or no) wrong on its march to continue crushing sales numbers and margins from competitors like IBM Corp. (NYSE: IBM) and Dell, Inc. (NASDAQ: DELL). Oddly, the company has done an admirable job of taking focus away from the corporate spying situation from a year ago and other problems by using its core business strengths to perform very well quarter to quarter.

Yesterday, a federal judge in Little Rock, Arkansas granted class-action status to truck drivers accusing Wal-Mart Stores Inc. (NYSE: WMT) of using racially discriminatory practices in hiring drivers, according to the Arkansas Democrat-Gazette.

The suit will include all black applicants in the U.S. who were denied driving jobs since September 22, 2001, and those who say they were denied or prevented from applying for a driving job as a result of Wal-Mart's policies.

U.S. District Judge William R. Wilson Jr. said that Wal-Mart drivers were screened by a committee of drivers. The judge noted that none of the screening committees had a majority of African Americans while some committees lacked any, despite a company rule that the panels be 50% diverse.

The class-action suit is expected to include less than 10,000 people. Plaintiffs looking for punitive damages would need to separately file a suit after the class-action case, according to the ruling.

It seems that discrimination continues to affect the working man. This case reminds me of the recent FedEx Corp. (NYSE: FDX) racial discrimination settlement (as well as the one in 2005). The suit alleged that FedEx Express discriminated against African American and Hispanic workers by paying them less than Caucasian workers, passing them over for promotion and treating them unfairly in evaluation and disciplinary proceedings.

While FedEx had denied committing any acts of racial discrimination, there was a $53.5 million payout to make the case go away. On the day of the settlement, FedEx shares were barely hurt, down 57 cents that morning. I expect Wal-Mart to look for a settlement and its shares to experience the same treatment as FedEx's on the news.

In a settlement that appears to be mutually beneficial, Technology Research Corporation (NASDAQ:TRCI) and Tower Manufacturing Corporation have agreed to bury the hatchet and all pending litigation between the two businesses has been dropped. The net result of the settlement is a cross-licensing agreement that should benefit both companies going forward, and TRC will receive $3.2 million in royalty payments, based on past sales, with payments to be made over a two-year term.

Given TRC's current stock value, which closed at $4.91 in very low volume, I see some clear potential when contrasting that closing price against TRC's previous 52-week high of $8.72, which was posted in February. TRC's 2006 annual report shows record revenues of $45.6 million, an increase of $6.2 million over the prior year, and they show consistent growth over the last four years. Currently, TRC has an EPS of 0.28 and a P/E ratio of 17.54.

Worthy of note are TRC's indications that they plan on increasing their focuses in marketing and engineering while also undertaking a program of strategically acquiring businesses or products to compliment their operating strengths without placing undue stress on the company by means of integration or funding. TRC notes several product areas in which revenue growth is already being achieved, and they have outlined a solid plan for increased net income.

If history serves as pattern, and I believe that it generally does, then Technology Research Corporation is a company worthy of attention. I get a good impression from what I have read about them and I think they have more than moderate potential. As always, do your own homework, but you may put me on record as saying: I really like this company.

The U.S. Justice Department wants to extend its oversight of Microsoft for two more years, until 2009. Microsoft has already agreed to it; I bet they weren't excited about it, though. AP reported today the Justice Department wants the extension because of lapses under the 2002 landmark antitrust settlement.

A U.S. judge must approve this extension of two years, which the Justice Department and 17 states support because of lapses under the current settlement.  AP also reports that government lawyers are prepared to extend oversight of Microsoft's business through 2012 if necessary.

Costs of settling the antitrust suit brought by the Justice Department and 17 states, plus all the related actions filed by individual companies hurt by Microsoft's business practices, have already cost the company billions.   Wonder where Microsoft's Internet business would be today if it had spent the billions on developing MSN and its Internet ad business instead rather than fighting these suits?