<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd">
<channel>
<title>BloggingStocks</title>
<link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com</link>
<description>BloggingStocks</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[EarthLink Class Action Ends in Refunds and Reduced Fees]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/04/07/earthlink-class-action-ends-in-refunds-and-reduced-fees/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/04/07/earthlink-class-action-ends-in-refunds-and-reduced-fees/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/04/07/earthlink-class-action-ends-in-refunds-and-reduced-fees/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/good-news/" rel="tag">Good news</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/products-and-services/" rel="tag">Products and Services</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/law/" rel="tag">Law</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/consumer-experience/" rel="tag">Consumer Experience</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/technology/" rel="tag">Technology</a></p><img hspace="4" border="1" align="right" vspace="4" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2010/04/earthlink-logo.jpg" />After five years, EarthLink (<a class="inlinked" href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/earthlink-inc/elnk/nas">ELNK</a>) has agreed to settle a class action lawsuit against it that had alleged improper application of early termination fees (ETF). The $3.7 million settlement will include a refund of half the ETF amount paid by approximately 850,000 customers, a reduction in the amount customers shall pay in future ETFs, and the ending of attempts to collect currently outstanding ETFs from customers. Additionally, EarthLink has agreed to assist with credit repair efforts in cases where unpaid ETFs were reported to credit monitoring agencies.<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/04/07/earthlink-class-action-ends-in-refunds-and-reduced-fees/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>EarthLink Class Action Ends in Refunds and Reduced Fees</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/04/07/earthlink-class-action-ends-in-refunds-and-reduced-fees/">EarthLink Class Action Ends in Refunds and Reduced Fees</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 07 Apr 2010 15:30:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.law.com/jsp/article.jsp?id=1202447060691&amp;rss=newswire>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/04/07/earthlink-class-action-ends-in-refunds-and-reduced-fees/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19429236/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/04/07/earthlink-class-action-ends-in-refunds-and-reduced-fees/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>class action</category><category>early termination fee</category><category>EarthLink</category><category>ETF</category><category>inthenews</category><category>settlement</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Gary Sattler]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 07 Apr 2010 15:30:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Boston Scientific to Pay Johnson &amp; Johnson $1.7B Settlement]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/02/01/boston-scientific-to-pay-johnson-and-johnson-1-7b-settlement/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/02/01/boston-scientific-to-pay-johnson-and-johnson-1-7b-settlement/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/02/01/boston-scientific-to-pay-johnson-and-johnson-1-7b-settlement/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/bad-news/" rel="tag">Bad News</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/law/" rel="tag">Law</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/jnj/" rel="tag">Johnson and Johnson (JNJ)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/bsx/" rel="tag">Boston Scientific (BSX)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/options/" rel="tag">Options</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/analysis/" rel="tag">Technical Analysis</a></p><a target="_blank" href="http://phx.corporate-ir.net/phoenix.zhtml?c=62272&amp;p=irol-irhome"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="right" alt="BSX logo" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2010/02/bsx-boston-scientific-logo.jpg" /></a>Boston Scientific (<a target="_blank" href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/boston-scientific-corporation/bsx/nys">BSX</a> - <a target="_blank" href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/boston-scientific-corporation/bsx/nys/option-chains">option chain</a>) stock is trading lower today <a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/article/boston-scientific-to-pay-jnj-173b-in/883374/">the company reached an agreement</a> with Johnson &amp; Johnson (<a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/johnson-and-johnson/jnj/nys">JNJ</a>) to <a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/article/boston-scientific-to-pay-jnj-173b-in/883374/">settle three patent disputes</a>. Under the deal, BSX will pay JNJ $1.725 billion. If you think this stock won't be rising too far in the coming months, then it could be a good time to look at a bearish hedged play on BSX.<br /><br />This morning, BSX opened at $8.48. So far today the stock has hit a high of $8.83 and a low of $8.24. As of 11:50, BSX is trading at $8.47, down 16 cents (-1.8%). The chart for BSX looks bullish and <a target="_blank" href="http://www.iotogo.com/spoutlookonline">S&amp;P</a> gives BSX a positive 4 STARS (out of 5) buy ranking.<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/02/01/boston-scientific-to-pay-johnson-and-johnson-1-7b-settlement/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Boston Scientific to Pay Johnson &amp; Johnson $1.7B Settlement</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/02/01/boston-scientific-to-pay-johnson-and-johnson-1-7b-settlement/">Boston Scientific to Pay Johnson &amp; Johnson $1.7B Settlement</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 01 Feb 2010 14:10:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/02/01/boston-scientific-to-pay-johnson-and-johnson-1-7b-settlement/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19340187/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/02/01/boston-scientific-to-pay-johnson-and-johnson-1-7b-settlement/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Boston Scientific</category><category>BostonScientific</category><category>BSX</category><category>inthenews</category><category>JNJ</category><category>Johnson and Johnson</category><category>JohnsonAndJohnson</category><category>options</category><category>settlement</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Brent Archer]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 01 Feb 2010 14:10:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Broadcom Settles Stock-Option Dispute]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/30/broadcom-settles-stock-option-dispute/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/30/broadcom-settles-stock-option-dispute/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/30/broadcom-settles-stock-option-dispute/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/brcm/" rel="tag">Broadcom Corp'A' (BRCM)</a></p><p><img  border="1" hspace="4" vspace="4" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2009/12/broadcom-logo-240.jpg" alt="" />Tech firm Broadcom (<a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/broadcom-corporation/brcm/nas" target="_blank">BRCM</a>) announced that it has <a href="http://www.edn.com/article/CA6713064.html?nid=2551" target="_blank">agreed in principle to settle a pending class action litigation</a> against the company and some of its current and former officers. The litigation surrounded the company's historical stock-option accounting practices, and was settled for $160.5 million in cash. </p>
<p>The legal action was on behalf of persons and entities that bought or acquired shares of BRCM between July 21, 2005 and July 13, 2006. The $160.5 million cash payment will result in the release and dismissal (with prejudice) of the claims against both the company and its officers and directors. In December 2006, BRCM was singled out as a company participating in backdating of stock options, an illegal practice.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/30/broadcom-settles-stock-option-dispute/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Broadcom Settles Stock-Option Dispute</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/30/broadcom-settles-stock-option-dispute/">Broadcom Settles Stock-Option Dispute</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 30 Dec 2009 12:40:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/30/broadcom-settles-stock-option-dispute/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19298102/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/30/broadcom-settles-stock-option-dispute/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>backdating</category><category>inthenews</category><category>litigation</category><category>settlement</category><category>tech</category><category>technical analysis</category><category>technology companies</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark Fightmaster]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 30 Dec 2009 12:40:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Advanced Micro Devices rallies after settling Intel tiff]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/12/advanced-micro-devices-rallies-after-settling-intel-tiff/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/12/advanced-micro-devices-rallies-after-settling-intel-tiff/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/12/advanced-micro-devices-rallies-after-settling-intel-tiff/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/law/" rel="tag">Law</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/intc/" rel="tag">Intel (INTC)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/amd/" rel="tag">Advanced Micro Dev (AMD)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/options/" rel="tag">Options</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/analysis/" rel="tag">Technical Analysis</a></p><p><img border="1" hspace="4" alt="" vspace="4" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2009/11/amd_logo-200x150.jpg" />Advanced Micro Devices (<a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/advanced-micro-devices-inc/amd/nys">AMD</a>) soared to a new annual high Thursday morning after the chipmaker <a href="http://www.miamiherald.com/business/nation/story/1329542.html">settled its antitrust case</a> against rival Intel (<a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/intel-corporation/intc/nas">INTC</a>). Under the terms of the agreement, Intel will shell out $1.25 billion to AMD, and will abide by a new set of rules for conducting business. The pact also includes a renewed cross-license agreement between the two chip titans.</p>
<p>In prepared comments, AMD CEO Dirk Meyer called the settlement a game-changer. "We are optimistic that it will usher a new era for our industry," he said. "We recognize that it will take time for people to understand how the operating conditions in the processor business have changed. But make no mistake -- they have changed."</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/12/advanced-micro-devices-rallies-after-settling-intel-tiff/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Advanced Micro Devices rallies after settling Intel tiff</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/12/advanced-micro-devices-rallies-after-settling-intel-tiff/">Advanced Micro Devices rallies after settling Intel tiff</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 12 Nov 2009 12:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/12/advanced-micro-devices-rallies-after-settling-intel-tiff/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19234626/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/12/advanced-micro-devices-rallies-after-settling-intel-tiff/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Advanced Micro Devices</category><category>AMD</category><category>annual high</category><category>antitrust</category><category>Dirk Meyer</category><category>featured</category><category>INTC</category><category>Intel</category><category>inthenews</category><category>options</category><category>settlement</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Elizabeth Harrow]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 12 Nov 2009 12:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Visa, MasterCard settle with Discover, but what about Morgan Stanley?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/10/28/visa-mastercard-settle-with-discover-but-what-about-morgan-sta/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/10/28/visa-mastercard-settle-with-discover-but-what-about-morgan-sta/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/10/28/visa-mastercard-settle-with-discover-but-what-about-morgan-sta/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/analyst-reports/" rel="tag">Analyst Reports</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/ma/" rel="tag">MasterCard Inc'A' (MA)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/ms/" rel="tag">Morgan Stanley (MS)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/v/" rel="tag">Visa Inc. (V)</a></p><p>Credit-card concerns <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/visa-inc/v/nys">Visa, Inc.</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/visa-inc/v/nys">V</a>) and <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/mastercard-incorporated/ma/nys">MasterCard, Inc.</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/mastercard-incorporated/ma/nys">MA</a>) will be shelling out up to $2.75 billion to <a href="http://money.aol.com/news/articles/qp/ap/_a/ahead-of-the-bell-credit-card-cos-settle/rfid153033948">settle an antitrust suit</a> with <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/discover-financial-services/dfs/nys">Discover Financial Services</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/discover-financial-services/dfs/nys">DFS</a>). Specifically, MasterCard will pay Discover $862.5 million in the fourth quarter, while Visa will fork over $1.89 billion over the course of 2009. Following the release of the settlement's details, an analyst at Keefe, Bruyette &amp; Woods is weighing in favorably on all three firms.</p>
<p>Sanjay Sakhrani called the news "a big win for Discover, as it provides an additional cushion to contend with the implications of a weaker U.S. economy." He expects the payments will add about $1.75 to Discover's earnings per share. However, he also cited the report as an upside catalyst for MasterCard and Visa, as it eliminates an overhang on shares of both companies -- an assertion supported by analyst Julio C. Quinteros, Jr., of Goldman Sachs.</p>
<p>Unfortunately, though, it's not all sunshine and rainbows in the credit-card group today. <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/morgan-stanley/ms/nys">Morgan Stanley</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/morgan-stanley/ms/nys">MS</a>) has filed its own suit against Discover in New York State Supreme Court, alleging that it's <a href="http://dealbook.blogs.nytimes.com/2008/10/28/mastercard-visa-settle-with-discover/">entitled to a chunk</a> of the $2.75-billion settlement. DFS was spun off from Morgan Stanley last year, and the latter company claims that it should receive a portion of the award under the terms of a special dividend agreement.</p>
<p>Not so fast, says Discover, which alleges that its parent company is in violation of their spinoff agreement, and "the amount of Morgan Stanley's special dividend is a matter of dispute." Morgan fired back that "there is absolutely no basis for Discover's claim that the agreement was breached." Stay tuned to see how this credit-card drama plays out -- in early trading, shares of all three credit card companies were higher.</p>
<p><em>Elizabeth Harrow is an analyst and financial writer in the research department at </em><a href="http://www.schaeffersresearch.com/"><em>Schaeffer's Investment Research</em></a><em>. She is featured in the video series </em><a href="http://www.schaeffersresearch.com/commentary/podcasts/videocenter.aspx"><em>Schaeffer's Daily Q&amp;A</em></a><em> on SchaeffersResearch.com.</em></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/10/28/visa-mastercard-settle-with-discover-but-what-about-morgan-sta/">Visa, MasterCard settle with Discover, but what about Morgan Stanley?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 28 Oct 2008 11:11:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/10/28/visa-mastercard-settle-with-discover-but-what-about-morgan-sta/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1355003/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/10/28/visa-mastercard-settle-with-discover-but-what-about-morgan-sta/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>antitrust</category><category>credit card</category><category>CreditCard</category><category>DFS</category><category>Discover Financial Services</category><category>DiscoverFinancialServices</category><category>inthenews</category><category>lawsuit</category><category>ma</category><category>Mastercard</category><category>morgan stanley</category><category>MorganStanley</category><category>ms</category><category>settlement</category><category>V</category><category>Visa Inc</category><category>VisaInc</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Elizabeth Harrow]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 28 Oct 2008 11:11:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Merck (MRK) higher on Buy rating despite Vioxx settlement news]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/07/18/merck-mrk-higher-on-buy-rating-despite-vioxx-settlement-news/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/07/18/merck-mrk-higher-on-buy-rating-despite-vioxx-settlement-news/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/07/18/merck-mrk-higher-on-buy-rating-despite-vioxx-settlement-news/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/law/" rel="tag">Law</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/mrk/" rel="tag">Merck and Co (MRK)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/analyst-initiations/" rel="tag">Analyst Initiations</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/options/" rel="tag">Options</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/analysis/" rel="tag">Technical Analysis</a></p><a target="_blank" href="http://www.merck.com/finance/"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="right" alt="MRK logo" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/01/mrk-merck-logo.jpg" /></a><a target="_blank" href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/merck-and-co-inc/mrk/nys">Merck &amp; Co</a> (NYSE: <a target="_blank" href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/merck-and-co-inc/mrk/nys">MRK</a>) shares are trading higher today after <a target="_blank" href="http://www.streetinsider.com/New+Coverage/Citi+Initiates+Coverage+on+Merck+%28MRK%29+with+a+Buy/3830017.html">a Citi Investment Research analyst initiated coverage on the stock with a "Buy" rating</a>, saying the company will benefit as rivals' drug patents expire in the coming year. This is despite news that came out today that <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ohio.com/business/25608204.html">Merck will soon start to send out almost $5B in Vioxx settlement checks</a>. If you think that the stock won't fall by too much in the coming months, then now could be a good time to look at a bullish hedged trade on MRK.<br /><br />After hitting a one-year high of $61.62 in December, the stock hit a one-year low of $34.49 in June. MRK opened this morning at $37.12. So far today the stock has hit a low of $36.60 and a high of $37.38. As of 1:05, MRK is trading at $37.38, up 42 cents(1.1%). The chart for MRK looks neutral and improving, while <a target="_blank" href="http://www.iotogo.com/spoutlookonline">S&amp;P</a> gives the stock a neutral 3 Stars (out of 5) Hold rating.<br /><br />For a bullish hedged play on this stock, I would consider an October <a target="_blank" href="http://www.iotogo.com/HSCS">bull-put credit spread</a> below the $32.50 range. A bull-put credit spread is an options position that combines the purchase and sale of put options to hedge risk in case the stock doesn't do what you think but still leverage nice returns. For this particular trade, we will make a 16.3% return in just three months as long as MRK is above $32.50 at October expiration. Merck would have to fall by more than 13% before we would start to lose money. Learn more about this type of trade <a target="_blank" href="http://www.iotogo.com/HSCS">here</a>.<br /><br />MRK hasn't been below $34.50 at all in the past year and has shown support around $37 recently. This trade could be risky if the company's earnings (due out 7/21) disappoint, but even if that happens, this position could be protected by the support the stock might find at its year low, which is just below $35.<br /><br /><em>Brent Archer is an options analyst and writer at <a target="_blank" href="http://www.iotogo.com/aolblogba">Investors Observer</a>. <br /><br />DISCLOSURE: Mr. Archer owns and/or controls diversified portfolios of long and short stock and option positions that may include holdings in companies he writes about. At publication time, Brent neither owns nor controls positions in MRK.</em><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/07/18/merck-mrk-higher-on-buy-rating-despite-vioxx-settlement-news/">Merck (MRK) higher on Buy rating despite Vioxx settlement news</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 18 Jul 2008 15:21:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/07/18/merck-mrk-higher-on-buy-rating-despite-vioxx-settlement-news/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1260420/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/07/18/merck-mrk-higher-on-buy-rating-despite-vioxx-settlement-news/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>analyst</category><category>inthenews</category><category>Investors Observer</category><category>InvestorsObserver</category><category>Merck</category><category>MRK</category><category>options</category><category>settlement</category><category>vioxx</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Brent Archer]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 18 Jul 2008 15:21:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Mastercard (MA) settles AmEx lawsuit out of court]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/25/mastercard-ma-settles-amex-lawsuit-out-of-court/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/25/mastercard-ma-settles-amex-lawsuit-out-of-court/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/25/mastercard-ma-settles-amex-lawsuit-out-of-court/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/major-movement/" rel="tag">Major Movement</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/good-news/" rel="tag">Good news</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/axp/" rel="tag">American Express (AXP)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/ma/" rel="tag">MasterCard Inc'A' (MA)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/options/" rel="tag">Options</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/analysis/" rel="tag">Technical Analysis</a></p><a href="http://investorrelations.mastercardintl.com/phoenix.zhtml?c=148835&amp;p=irol-irhome" target="_blank"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/12/ma-mastercard-logo.jpg" alt="MA logo" /></a><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/mastercard-incorporated/ma/nys">Mastercard</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/mastercard-incorporated/ma/nys">MA</a>) shares are trading higher today after the company announced it will pay competitor <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/american-express-company/axp/nys">American Express</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/american-express-company/axp/nys">AXP</a>) up to <a href="http://www.bizjournals.com/stlouis/stories/2008/06/23/daily41.html?ana=from_rss" target="_blank">$1.8 billion to settle an antitrust lawsuit</a>. If you think that the stock won't fall by too much in the coming months, then now could be a good time to look at a bullish hedged trade on MA.<br /><br />After hitting a one-year low of $120.00 in August, the stock hit a one-year high of $320.30 in May. MA opened this morning at $291.10. So far today the stock has hit a low of $290.10 and a high of $295.16. As of 12:40, MA is trading at $294.10, up $13.17 (4.9%). The chart for MA looks bullish but deteriorating, while <a href="http://www.iotogo.com/spoutlookonline" target="_blank">S&amp;P</a> gives the stock a neutral 3 STARS (out of 5) hold rating.
<p>For a bullish hedged play on this stock, I would consider an October <a href="http://www.iotogo.com/HSCS" target="_blank">bull-put credit spread</a> below the $195 range. A bull-put credit spread is an options position that combines the purchase and sale of put options to hedge risk in case the stock doesn't do what you think but still leverage nice returns. For this particular trade, we will make a 6.4% return in four months as long as MA is above $195 at October expiration. Mastercard would have to fall by more than 33% before we would start to lose money. Learn more about this type of trade <a href="http://www.iotogo.com/HSCS" target="_blank">here</a>.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/25/mastercard-ma-settles-amex-lawsuit-out-of-court/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Mastercard (MA) settles AmEx lawsuit out of court</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/25/mastercard-ma-settles-amex-lawsuit-out-of-court/">Mastercard (MA) settles AmEx lawsuit out of court</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 25 Jun 2008 15:03:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/25/mastercard-ma-settles-amex-lawsuit-out-of-court/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1236452/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/25/mastercard-ma-settles-amex-lawsuit-out-of-court/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>American Express</category><category>AmericanExpress</category><category>AXP</category><category>Investors Observer</category><category>InvestorsObserver</category><category>lawsuit</category><category>MA</category><category>Mastercard</category><category>options</category><category>settlement</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Brent Archer]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 25 Jun 2008 15:03:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[BP sets aside more funds for legal settlements]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/03/04/bp-sets-aside-more-funds-for-legal-settlements/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/03/04/bp-sets-aside-more-funds-for-legal-settlements/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/03/04/bp-sets-aside-more-funds-for-legal-settlements/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/bad-news/" rel="tag">Bad News</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/bp/" rel="tag">BP p.l.c. ADS (BP)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/options/" rel="tag">Options</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/analysis/" rel="tag">Technical Analysis</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/oil/" rel="tag">Oil</a></p><a target="_blank" href="http://www.bp.com/investorhome.do?categoryId=132&amp;contentId=2004195"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="right" alt="BP logo" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/03/bp-british-petroleum-logo.jpg" /></a><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/bp-p-l-c/bp/nys">BP plc</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/bp-p-l-c/bp/nys">BP</a>) stock is falling this morning after the company announced this morning <a href="http://money.aol.com/news/articles/_a/bp-raises-claim-fund-for-texas-city/n20080304083709990015">it has raised its claim fund to $2.13 billion</a> for the 2005 explosion at its Texas City refinery. <a href="http://money.aol.com/marketnews/futures/commodities?_s=/CL">Lower oil futures</a> are also hurting the stock. If you think this stock won't be rising too far in the coming months, then it could be a good time to look at a bearish hedged play on BP.
<p>After hitting a one-year high of $79.77 in November, the stock hit a one-year low of $57.85 in January. This morning, BP opened at $63.2. So far today the stock has hit a low of $63.15 and a high of $63.99. As of 12:40, BP is trading at $63.90, down $0.73 (-1.1%). The chart for BP looks bearish but slightly improving while <a target="_blank" href="http://www.iotogo.com/spoutlookonline">S&amp;P</a> gives BP a positive 4 STARS (out of 5) buy rating.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/03/04/bp-sets-aside-more-funds-for-legal-settlements/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>BP sets aside more funds for legal settlements</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/03/04/bp-sets-aside-more-funds-for-legal-settlements/">BP sets aside more funds for legal settlements</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 04 Mar 2008 14:28:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/03/04/bp-sets-aside-more-funds-for-legal-settlements/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1131170/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/03/04/bp-sets-aside-more-funds-for-legal-settlements/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>BP</category><category>inthenews</category><category>Investors Observer</category><category>InvestorsObserver</category><category>oil</category><category>options</category><category>settlement</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Brent Archer]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 04 Mar 2008 14:28:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[eBay and MercExchange settle long-term feud]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/02/29/ebay-and-mercexchange-settle-long-term-fued/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/02/29/ebay-and-mercexchange-settle-long-term-fued/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/02/29/ebay-and-mercexchange-settle-long-term-fued/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/management/" rel="tag">Management</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/law/" rel="tag">Law</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/internet/" rel="tag">Internet</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/competitive-strategy/" rel="tag">Competitive Strategy</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/ebay/" rel="tag">eBay (EBAY)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/technology/" rel="tag">Technology</a></p><img alt="eBay headquarters" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/02/ebaypicture.jpg" width="240" align="right" />In what may end up being a net positive for eBay, albeit possibly an expensive one, a settlement has been reached in the litigation over patent infringement between <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/ebay-inc/ebay/nas">eBay Inc.</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/ebay-inc/ebay/nas">EBAY</a>) and MercExchange. Financial figures of the settlement have not been disclosed, but a <a href="http://www.computerworld.com/action/article.do?command=viewArticleBasic&amp;taxonomyName=internet_business&amp;articleId=9065618&amp;taxonomyId=71&amp;intsrc=kc_top">report from </a><em><a href="javascript:void(0);/*1204306531421*/">Computerworld</a> </em>indicates that eBay shall purchase the three patents which were the subject of the litigation, as well as a number of other related technologies and developments. <br /><br />Mike Jacobson, eBay senior vice president and general counsel, was quoted by <em>Computerworld </em>as stating: "In addition to resolving the <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/tag/litigation/">litigation</a>, this settlement gives us access to additional intellectual property that will help improve and further secure our marketplaces." MercExchange founder and CEO Thomas Woolston, is quoted in the same report as stating: "It seemed like the right time to put it behind us."<br /><br />In May of 2003, a jury in the case found eBay guilty of patent infringement and an injunction was sought and granted. However, in reviewing the <a href="http://www.computerworld.com/action/inform.do?command=search&amp;searchTerms=U.S.+Court+of+Appeals">US Court of Appeals</a> decision, the <a href="http://www.computerworld.com/governmenttopics/government/legalissues/story/0,10801,109993,00.html">Supreme Court</a> unanimously derailed the long standing practice of issuing immediate injunctions in cases of intellectual property infringement, insisting that in the future, such injunctions must meet the requirements of a four-factor test.<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/02/29/ebay-and-mercexchange-settle-long-term-fued/">eBay and MercExchange settle long-term feud</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 29 Feb 2008 14:09:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.computerworld.com/action/article.do?command=viewArticleBasic&amp;taxonomyName=internet_business&amp;articleId=9065618&amp;taxonomyId=71&amp;intsrc=kc_top>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/02/29/ebay-and-mercexchange-settle-long-term-fued/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1128239/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/02/29/ebay-and-mercexchange-settle-long-term-fued/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Buy It Now</category><category>BuyItNow</category><category>Computerworld</category><category>eBay</category><category>infringement</category><category>inthenews</category><category>litigation</category><category>MercExchange</category><category>patent</category><category>search</category><category>security</category><category>settlement</category><category>Supreme Court</category><category>SupremeCourt</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Gary Sattler]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 29 Feb 2008 14:09:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Intel sinks on $250M settlement with Transmeta]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/10/24/intel-sinks-on-250m-settlement/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/10/24/intel-sinks-on-250m-settlement/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/10/24/intel-sinks-on-250m-settlement/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/bad-news/" rel="tag">Bad News</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/intc/" rel="tag">Intel (INTC)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/options/" rel="tag">Options</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/analysis/" rel="tag">Technical Analysis</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/technology/" rel="tag">Technology</a></p><a href="http://www.intc.com/phoenix.zhtml?iid=homepage+ftr_investor&amp;c=101302&amp;p=irol-IRHome" target="_blank"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/10/intc-intel-logo.jpg" alt="INTC logo" /></a><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/intel-corporation/intc/nas">Intel Corp.</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/intel-corporation/intc/nas">INTC</a>) stock is dropping today after <a href="http://money.aol.com/news/articles/_a/transmeta-intel-settle-patent-suit/n20071024085809990005">the company agreed to pay a $250 million settlement</a> to <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/transmeta-corporation/tmta/nas">Transmeta Corp</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/transmeta-corporation/tmta/nas">TMTA</a>) in a patent dispute. The terms include one initial payment of $150M plus annual $20M disbursements. If you think this stock won't be rising too far in the coming months, then it could be a good time to look at a bearish hedged play on INTC.<br /><br />Intel stock has climbed over the past six months, hitting a one-year high of $26.98 last week. This morning, INTC opened at $26.33. So far today the stock has hit a low of $25.62 and a high of $26.39. As of 11:50, INTC is trading at $25.72, down $1.08 (-4.0%). The chart for INTC looks bullish and steady, while <a href="http://www.iotogo.com/spoutlookonline" target="_blank">S&amp;P</a> gives the stock a positive 4 STARS (out of 5) buy rating.<br /><br />For a bearish hedged play on this stock, I would consider a January <a href="http://www.iotogo.com/HSCS" target="_blank">bear-call credit spread</a> above the $30 range. A bear-call credit spread is an options position that combines the purchase and sale of call options to hedge risk in case the stock doesn't do what you think but still leverage nice returns. For this particular trade, we will make a 4.3% return in 3 months as long as INTC is below $30 at January expiration. Intel would have to rise by more than 16% before we would start to lose money. Learn more about this type of trade <a href="http://www.iotogo.com/HSCS" target="_blank">here</a>.<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/10/24/intel-sinks-on-250m-settlement/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Intel sinks on $250M settlement with Transmeta</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/10/24/intel-sinks-on-250m-settlement/">Intel sinks on $250M settlement with Transmeta</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 24 Oct 2007 11:50:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/10/24/intel-sinks-on-250m-settlement/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1020777/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/10/24/intel-sinks-on-250m-settlement/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>INTC</category><category>Intel</category><category>inthenews</category><category>Investors Observer</category><category>InvestorsObserver</category><category>options</category><category>patent</category><category>settlement</category><category>TMTA</category><category>Transmeta</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Brent Archer]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 24 Oct 2007 11:50:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Hewlett-Packard settles largest-ever stock options backdating lawsuit]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/10/16/hewlett-packard-settles-largest-ever-stock-options-backdating-la/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/10/16/hewlett-packard-settles-largest-ever-stock-options-backdating-la/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/10/16/hewlett-packard-settles-largest-ever-stock-options-backdating-la/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/management/" rel="tag">Management</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/law/" rel="tag">Law</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/dell/" rel="tag">Dell (DELL)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/hpq/" rel="tag">Hewlett-Packard (HPQ)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/ibm/" rel="tag">International Business Machines (IBM)</a></p>When <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/hewlett-packard-company/hpq/nys">Hewlett-Packard Co.</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/hewlett-packard-company/hpq/nys">HPQ</a>) bought <a href="http://www.hp.com/hpinfo/newsroom/press/2006/060725a.html">Mercury Interactive</a> a little over a year ago, the company probably did not know that a pretty large settlement would be forthcoming from several pension funds that accused the now-subsidiary of stock-option backdating. The <a href="http://ap.google.com/article/ALeqM5iECyahuSBS3I0tEQ1-mNX3yRCu4AD8S9P7K01">settlement</a> reached earlier this week was $117.5 million, the largest of its kind.<br /><br />The second-largest out-of-court settlement due to accusatory stock options backdating was $18 million, so the Mercury case seems unique: why such a large settlement here? HP knew of the shenanigans when it purchased the company in 2006, although the extent was probably unknown at the time. Even with the $4.5 billion purchase price and the $117.5 million settlement, Mercury was still a wise investment for HP moving forward, as it's already become a lucrative area within the company.<br /><br />HP wants this situation and settlement to quickly be swept under the rug, which is no surprise. HP is shining these days under operational CEO Mark Hurd and from all appearances, can do little (or no) wrong on its march to continue crushing sales numbers and margins from competitors like <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/international-business-machines-corporation/ibm/nys">IBM Corp.</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/international-business-machines-corporation/ibm/nys">IBM</a>) and <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/dell-inc/dell/nas">Dell, Inc.</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/dell-inc/dell/nas">DELL</a>). Oddly, the company has done an admirable job of taking focus away from the <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/10/04/former-hp-chairwoman-patty-dunn-indicted/">corporate spying situation</a> from a year ago and other problems by using its core business strengths to perform very well quarter to quarter.<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/10/16/hewlett-packard-settles-largest-ever-stock-options-backdating-la/">Hewlett-Packard settles largest-ever stock options backdating lawsuit</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 16 Oct 2007 10:14:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://money.aol.com/news/articles/wsj/_a/h-p-settles-suit-over-mercury/n20071015151609990001>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/10/16/hewlett-packard-settles-largest-ever-stock-options-backdating-la/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1014349/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/10/16/hewlett-packard-settles-largest-ever-stock-options-backdating-la/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>backdating</category><category>Hewlett-Packard</category><category>lawsuit</category><category>Mercury Interactive</category><category>MercuryInteractive</category><category>settlement</category><category>stock options</category><category>StockOptions</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Brian White]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 16 Oct 2007 10:14:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Wal-Mart faces class-action suit for racially discriminatory practices]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/05/18/wal-mart-faces-class-action-suit-for-racially-discriminatory-pra/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/05/18/wal-mart-faces-class-action-suit-for-racially-discriminatory-pra/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/05/18/wal-mart-faces-class-action-suit-for-racially-discriminatory-pra/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/bad-news/" rel="tag">Bad News</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/press-releases/" rel="tag">Press Releases</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/industry/" rel="tag">Industry</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/law/" rel="tag">Law</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/employees/" rel="tag">Employees</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/fdx/" rel="tag">FedEx Corp (FDX)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/ups/" rel="tag">United Parcel'B' (UPS)</a></p><p><a href="http://www.theflyonthewall.com/splashPage.php?source=AOL"><img alt="" hspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/05/aol-fly-logo.gif" align="right" vspace="4" border="1" /></a>Yesterday, a federal judge in Little Rock, Arkansas granted class-action status to truck drivers accusing <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/wal-mart-stores-inc/wmt/nys">Wal-Mart Stores Inc.</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/wal-mart-stores-inc/wmt/nys">WMT</a>) of using racially discriminatory practices in hiring drivers, according to the <a href="http://www2.arkansasonline.com/news/2007/may/17/suit-against-wal-mart-class-action/?business"><em>Arkansas Democrat-Gazette</em>.</a><br /><br />The suit will include all black applicants in the U.S. who were denied driving jobs since September 22, 2001, and those who say they were denied or prevented from applying for a driving job as a result of Wal-Mart's policies. <br /><br />U.S. District Judge William R. Wilson Jr. said that Wal-Mart drivers were screened by a committee of drivers. The judge noted that none of the screening committees had a majority of African Americans while some committees lacked any, despite a company rule that the panels be 50% diverse. <br /><br />The class-action suit is expected to include less than 10,000 people. Plaintiffs looking for punitive damages would need to separately file a suit after the class-action case, according to the ruling.<br /><br />It seems that discrimination continues to affect the working man. This case reminds me of the recent <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/fedex-corporation/fdx/nys?tabs=quotesandnews">FedEx Corp.</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/fedex-corporation/fdx/nys?tabs=quotesandnews">FDX</a>) <a href="http:// http://investing.reuters.co.uk/news/articleinvesting.aspx?type=basicIndustries&amp;storyID=2007-04-11T170338Z_01_N11220156_RTRIDST_0_SP_PAGE_023-N11220156-OISBI.XML">racial discrimination settlement</a> (as well as<a href="http://hr.blr.com/news.aspx?id=16885"> the one in 2005</a>). The suit alleged that FedEx Express discriminated against African American and Hispanic workers by paying them less than Caucasian workers, passing them over for promotion and treating them unfairly in evaluation and disciplinary proceedings.</p>
<p>While FedEx had denied committing any acts of racial discrimination, there was a $53.5 million payout to make the case go away. On the day of the settlement, FedEx shares were barely hurt, down 57 cents that morning. I expect Wal-Mart to look for a settlement and its shares to experience the same treatment as FedEx's on the news.</p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/05/18/wal-mart-faces-class-action-suit-for-racially-discriminatory-pra/">Wal-Mart faces class-action suit for racially discriminatory practices</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 18 May 2007 14:45:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/05/18/wal-mart-faces-class-action-suit-for-racially-discriminatory-pra/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/899302/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/05/18/wal-mart-faces-class-action-suit-for-racially-discriminatory-pra/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>bias</category><category>discrimination</category><category>fdx</category><category>fedex</category><category>lawsuit</category><category>racial</category><category>settlement</category><category>wal-mart</category><category>wmt</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Kevin Shult]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 18 May 2007 14:45:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Technology Research Corp shows signs of rebound]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/01/15/technology-research-corp-shows-signs-of-rebound/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/01/15/technology-research-corp-shows-signs-of-rebound/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/01/15/technology-research-corp-shows-signs-of-rebound/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/deals/" rel="tag">Deals</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/good-news/" rel="tag">Good news</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/press-releases/" rel="tag">Press Releases</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/products-and-services/" rel="tag">Products and Services</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/industry/" rel="tag">Industry</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/law/" rel="tag">Law</a></p><p><img height="102" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/01/logotrc01.jpg" width="320" align="right" alt="" />In a settlement that appears to be mutually beneficial, Technology Research Corporation (NASDAQ:<a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/technology-research-corporation/trci/nas">TRCI</a>) and Tower Manufacturing Corporation <a href="http://www.trci.net/news/07_01_03.html">have agreed</a> to bury the hatchet and all pending litigation between the two businesses has been dropped. The net result of the settlement is a cross-licensing agreement that should benefit both companies going forward, and TRC will receive $3.2 million in royalty payments, based on past sales, with payments to be made over a two-year term. </p>
<p>Given TRC's current stock value, which closed at $4.91 in very low volume, I see some clear potential when contrasting that closing price against TRC's previous 52-week high of $8.72, which was posted in February. TRC's <a href="http://www.trci.net/annual_reports/pdf/2006_Report.pdf">2006 annual report</a> shows record revenues of $45.6 million, an increase of $6.2 million over the prior year, and they show consistent growth over the last four years. Currently, TRC has an EPS of 0.28 and a P/E ratio of 17.54.</p>
<p>Worthy of note are TRC's indications that they plan on increasing their focuses in marketing and engineering while also undertaking a program of strategically acquiring businesses or products to compliment their operating strengths without placing undue stress on the company by means of integration or funding. TRC notes several product areas in which revenue growth is already being achieved, and they have outlined a solid plan for increased net income.</p>
<p>If history serves as pattern, and I believe that it generally does, then Technology Research Corporation is a company worthy of attention. I get a good impression from what I have read about them and I think they have more than moderate potential. As always, do your own homework, but you may put me on record as saying: I really like this company.</p>
<p> </p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/01/15/technology-research-corp-shows-signs-of-rebound/">Technology Research Corp shows signs of rebound</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 15 Jan 2007 10:10:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/01/15/technology-research-corp-shows-signs-of-rebound/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/735563/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/01/15/technology-research-corp-shows-signs-of-rebound/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>corporation</category><category>manufacturing</category><category>research</category><category>settlement</category><category>technology</category><category>tower</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Gary Sattler]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 15 Jan 2007 10:10:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Microsoft oversight extended to 2009?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/05/12/microsoft-oversight-extended-to-2009/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/05/12/microsoft-oversight-extended-to-2009/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/05/12/microsoft-oversight-extended-to-2009/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/bad-news/" rel="tag">Bad News</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/industry/" rel="tag">Industry</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/law/" rel="tag">Law</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/goog/" rel="tag">Google (GOOG)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/msft/" rel="tag">Microsoft (MSFT)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/yhoo/" rel="tag">Yahoo! (YHOO)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/aapl/" rel="tag">Apple Inc (AAPL)</a></p><p>The U.S. Justice Department wants&nbsp;to extend its oversight of Microsoft for two more years, until 2009.&nbsp;Microsoft has already agreed to it;&nbsp;I bet they weren't excited about it, though.&nbsp;AP reported today the Justice Department wants the extension because of lapses under&nbsp;the 2002&nbsp;landmark antitrust settlement.</p>
<p>A U.S. judge must approve this extension of two years, which the Justice Department and 17 states support because of lapses under the current settlement.&nbsp; AP also reports that government lawyers are prepared to extend oversight of Microsoft's business through 2012 if necessary.</p>
<p>Costs of settling the antitrust&nbsp;suit brought by the Justice Department and 17 states,&nbsp;plus all the related actions filed by individual companies hurt by Microsoft's business practices, have already cost the company <a href="http://Citing Microsoft Corp. lapses under a landmark antitrust settlement, the Justice Department said Friday it wants to extend by two years its oversight of some of the company's business practices until at least November 2009.">billions.</a>&nbsp;&nbsp; Wonder where Microsoft's Internet business would be today if&nbsp;it had spent the billions on developing MSN and its Internet ad business instead rather than fighting these suits?</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/05/12/microsoft-oversight-extended-to-2009/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Microsoft oversight extended to 2009?</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/05/12/microsoft-oversight-extended-to-2009/">Microsoft oversight extended to 2009?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 12 May 2006 16:50:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/05/12/microsoft-oversight-extended-to-2009/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/617852/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/05/12/microsoft-oversight-extended-to-2009/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>antitrust</category><category>Apple</category><category>Bill Gates</category><category>BillGates</category><category>Google</category><category>Justice Department</category><category>JusticeDepartment</category><category>Microsoft</category><category>settlement</category><category>Yahoo</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Lita Epstein]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 12 May 2006 16:50:00 EST</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
