<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd">
<channel>
<title>BloggingStocks</title>
<link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com</link>
<description>BloggingStocks</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Fannie Mae's new program. Is this a winner or what?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/12/fannie-maes-new-program-is-this-a-winner-or-what/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/12/fannie-maes-new-program-is-this-a-winner-or-what/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/12/fannie-maes-new-program-is-this-a-winner-or-what/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/deals/" rel="tag">Deals</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/bac/" rel="tag">Bank of America (BAC)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/cfc/" rel="tag">Countrywide Financial (CFC)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/personalfinance/" rel="tag">Personal Finance</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/housing/" rel="tag">Housing</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/recession/" rel="tag">Recession</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/financial-crisis/" rel="tag">Financial Crisis</a></p><img hspace="4" border="1" align="right" vspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/11/realestate.jpg" alt="" />Not to worry, your mortgage is $200,000 and your house is worth only $150,000. Fannie Mae to the rescue. Fannie Mae will let you sell your home at $150,000 and Fannie Mae will take the loss. You don't even need a buyer for your home!<u> </u>
<p>This situation is called being "upside down," which means that you owe more than the house is worth. Selling your home when you are "upside down" is called a "<a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB123146645355666873.html?mod=article-outset-box">short sale</a>."</p>
<p>This is not a new practice. It has been used before but never without a buyer. Most deals fell through because the paper work took too long or because lenders, servicing firms and mortgage guarantors rejected the sales price. For these reasons, "short sales" have a bad reputation among real estate agents.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/12/fannie-maes-new-program-is-this-a-winner-or-what/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Fannie Mae's new program. Is this a winner or what?</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/12/fannie-maes-new-program-is-this-a-winner-or-what/">Fannie Mae's new program. Is this a winner or what?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 12 Jan 2009 14:15:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://online.wsj.com/article/SB123146645355666873.html?mod=article-outset-box>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/12/fannie-maes-new-program-is-this-a-winner-or-what/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1424085/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/12/fannie-maes-new-program-is-this-a-winner-or-what/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Fannie Mae</category><category>FannieMae</category><category>inthenews</category><category>short sale</category><category>ShortSale</category><category>test program</category><category>TestProgram</category><category>upside down</category><category>UpsideDown</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Connie Madon]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 12 Jan 2009 14:15:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Makeover needed: Short selling stocks]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/10/24/makeover-needed-short-selling-stocks/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/10/24/makeover-needed-short-selling-stocks/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/10/24/makeover-needed-short-selling-stocks/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/rants-and-raves/" rel="tag">Rants and Raves</a></p><p><em><img alt="" hspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/10/makeover-23-200cm101608.jpg" align="right" vspace="4" border="1" />This post is part of a feature on companies and products that our bloggers think are in need of a makeover.</em> <a href="http://www.walletpop.com/specials/makeovers-needed" target="_blank"><em>See all 26</em></a><em>.</em></p>
<p>In light of the short-selling ban, someone recently asked me for my opinion about short selling. Personally, I'm grudgingly accepting of the practice, but I believe that some serious changes need to be made. I believe that the practice of short selling should be made harder to engage in, more expensive to execute, limited in duration, and heavily scrutinized.</p>
<p>The uptick rule is fine, and it never should have been suspended, but I feel that it falls short of the mark. Bear raids can still be orchestrated in spite of uptick only buys. Purchasing on the uptick simply slows the process a little. A system must be developed by which the practice of bear raids is effectively terminated.</p>
<p>When I researched opinions and viewpoints on short selling, it became quite apparent that the writers I had encountered were not supporting short selling nearly as much as they were simply railing against a short-selling ban. Not one person actually made a case for why the practice is essential to market health. The closest I came to finding an eloquent argument in favor of short selling was an <a href="http://money.cnn.com/2008/10/02/markets/thebuzz/?postversion=2008100212">article by Paul R. LaMonica</a>, editor at large, CNNMoney.com. Though Mr. LaMonica didn't really explain to me why I should be shorting stocks to benefit the markets, he did quote the SEC on 3.5 reasons why shorting might be beneficial.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/10/24/makeover-needed-short-selling-stocks/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Makeover needed: Short selling stocks</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/10/24/makeover-needed-short-selling-stocks/">Makeover needed: Short selling stocks</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 24 Oct 2008 10:05:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/10/24/makeover-needed-short-selling-stocks/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1341381/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/10/24/makeover-needed-short-selling-stocks/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>liquidity</category><category>makeover</category><category>new capital</category><category>Paul R. LaMonica</category><category>risk management</category><category>short sale</category><category>short selling</category><category>short selling ban</category><category>short selling restrictions</category><category>uptick rule</category><category>volatility</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Gary Sattler]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 24 Oct 2008 10:05:00 EST</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
