<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd">
<channel>
<title>BloggingStocks</title>
<link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com</link>
<description>BloggingStocks</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Recession harder on singles -- go get hitched!]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/02/recession-harder-on-singles-go-get-hitched/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/02/recession-harder-on-singles-go-get-hitched/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/02/recession-harder-on-singles-go-get-hitched/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/employees/" rel="tag">Employees</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/economic-data/" rel="tag">Economic Data</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/federal-reserve/" rel="tag">Federal Reserve</a></p><p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.dailyfinance.com/media/2009/03/mnlaidoff200.jpg" />If you're single, you're 50% more likely to lose your job, according to a study published Friday by the <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/tag/FederalReserve/">Federal Reserve</a> Bank of St. Louis. <a href="http://www.usatoday.com/money/economy/2009-10-01-recession-singles-unemployment_N.htm" target="_blank">This is no different from most recessions</a>, but neither the stat nor the trend loses its shock value with each downturn. Now that the <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/tag/unemploymentrate/">unemployment rate</a> has edged higher, to 9.8% last month, the plight of singles is worsening.</p>
<p>Single employment fell 4.8% from December 2007 through June, with the married folks losing their jobs at a rate of only 3.1%. In August, the single jobless rate reached 13.5%, while those encumbered with spouses fared much better at 6.3%.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/02/recession-harder-on-singles-go-get-hitched/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Recession harder on singles -- go get hitched!</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/02/recession-harder-on-singles-go-get-hitched/">Recession harder on singles -- go get hitched!</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 02 Oct 2009 14:20:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/02/recession-harder-on-singles-go-get-hitched/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19182310/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/02/recession-harder-on-singles-go-get-hitched/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>banks</category><category>federal reserve</category><category>inthenews</category><category>jobless rate</category><category>married</category><category>missouri</category><category>single</category><category>st louis</category><category>unemployed</category><category>unemployment rates</category><category>unmarried</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tom Johansmeyer]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 02 Oct 2009 14:20:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Dating in 'Hooville]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/12/20/dating-in-hooville/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/12/20/dating-in-hooville/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/12/20/dating-in-hooville/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/consumer-experience/" rel="tag">Consumer Experience</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/internet/" rel="tag">Internet</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/yhoo/" rel="tag">Yahoo! (YHOO)</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2006/12/yahoo_personals.jpg"  alt="yahoo personals" />I read <a href="http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/12/20/yahoo-upgrades-personals-does-this-stuff-work/">somewhere</a> today that Yahoo! Inc. (NASDAQ:YHOO) Personals is the number one dating service on the Internet. They say it's lonely at the top, but apparently singles using the site have been successful in quelling <em>their</em> loneliness -- just when I was certain that that internet dating stuff was bogus ...<br /><br />Rivaled by Match.com, the Hoo's in Yahooville are working industriously to stay one step ahead of the game. They've recently added a new feature called "Quick View", which allows the user to scan for potential mates more quickly and efficiently. They are afforded the ability to mark off characteristics, (i.e., smoker, non-smoker) as "breaker" or "maker", this way any received profiles with 'breaker" traits will be labeled as such. And it's likely that the "breaker" will be discarded by the user - "Layta!". Sounds like a good deal, right? Quick, convenient, and it saves precious time. I don't think so. (Note: if you don't have the time to really get to know and evaluate a person, how will you have time for a relationship?)<br /><br />First of all the whole idea of a first impression being based on a profile (a Quick View) -- mere words and check offs -- is whack. You can hardly trust people in person, let alone on paper.<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/12/20/dating-in-hooville/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Dating in 'Hooville</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/12/20/dating-in-hooville/">Dating in 'Hooville</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 20 Dec 2006 17:24:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/12/20/dating-in-hooville/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/722242/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/12/20/dating-in-hooville/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>breakers</category><category>dating</category><category>makers</category><category>match</category><category>match.com</category><category>online dating</category><category>OnlineDating</category><category>personals</category><category>single</category><category>singles</category><category>yahoo</category><category>yahoo! personals</category><category>Yahoo!Personals</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Lisa Shammas]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 20 Dec 2006 17:24:00 EST</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
