<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd">
<channel>
<title>BloggingStocks</title>
<link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com</link>
<description>BloggingStocks</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Facebook's 'Sponsored Stories' Turns Your Updates into Ads]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2011/02/02/facebook-sponsored-stories/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2011/02/02/facebook-sponsored-stories/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2011/02/02/facebook-sponsored-stories/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/launches/" rel="tag">Launches</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/internet/" rel="tag">Internet</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/marketing-and-advertising/" rel="tag">Marketing and Advertising</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/technology/" rel="tag">Technology</a></p><p><img border="1" align="right" vspace="4" hspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.dailyfinance.com/media/2010/08/facebook.jpg" alt="Facebook" />One of these days, Facebook is likely to go public. But how much could its shares be worth in an initial public offering? The numbers are all over the place. From Bloomberg's estimate late last year that it was worth $25 billion to<em> Fortune</em>'s estimate last August of $50 billion. Now, there is another report from a financial research firm, Trefis, that pegs the value at $45 billion today -- but potentially as much as $125 billion, if a few things go right.</p>
<p>One of the things that could go right, is coming up a with a new way to generate revenue -- and Facebook says it has a plan. It's called "sponsored stories." The company plans to pull content out of members' status updates for use in advertisements that will appear in their friends' Facebook pages.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2011/02/02/facebook-sponsored-stories/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Facebook's 'Sponsored Stories' Turns Your Updates into Ads</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2011/02/02/facebook-sponsored-stories/">Facebook's 'Sponsored Stories' Turns Your Updates into Ads</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 02 Feb 2011 14:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2011/02/02/facebook-sponsored-stories/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19817272/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2011/02/02/facebook-sponsored-stories/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>display ads</category><category>Facebook</category><category>Facebook ads</category><category>Facebook sponsored stories</category><category>social network</category><category>sponsored stories</category><category>user content</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Connie Madon]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 02 Feb 2011 14:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Social Games Player Zynga Is #2 on PayPal]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/03/23/social-games-player-zynga-is-2-on-paypal/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/03/23/social-games-player-zynga-is-2-on-paypal/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/03/23/social-games-player-zynga-is-2-on-paypal/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/ebay/" rel="tag">eBay (EBAY)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/c/" rel="tag">Citigroup Inc. (C)</a></p><img hspace="4" border="1" align="right" vspace="4" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2010/03/paypallogo.jpg" />The fact that eBay (<a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/ebay-inc/ebay/nas" target="_blank">EBAY</a>) is PayPal's largest merchant isn't exactly surprising. The auction market is huge, and it's also the online payment company's parent. Yet, <a href="http://www.insidefacebook.com/2010/03/22/zynga-paypal%e2%80%99s-second-largest-merchant-in-2009/?utm_source=feedburner&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Feed%3A+InsideFacebook+%28Inside+Facebook%29&amp;utm_content=Google+Feedfetcher" target="_blank">the word out of the 2010 Media Summit in New York last week</a> is that Zynga, the social media games company, is the second largest merchant for the payment environment. Social games are growing rapidly, bolstered in large part by the rise of <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/tag/Facebook/">Facebook</a>, which now boasts around 400 million users.<br />
<br />
As <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/tag/socialmedia/">social media</a> companies realize they need to move to the next level -- from adoption to revenue -- the virtual goods market has emerged as a substantial revenue stream, and Zynga's environment appears to have been designed to capitalize on it. According to an estimate by Citigroup (<a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/citigroup-incorporated/c/nys" target="_blank">C</a>) analyst Mark Mahaney, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/tag/PayPal/">PayPal</a> took care o$500 million in virtual goods payments last year.<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/03/23/social-games-player-zynga-is-2-on-paypal/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Social Games Player Zynga Is #2 on PayPal</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/03/23/social-games-player-zynga-is-2-on-paypal/">Social Games Player Zynga Is #2 on PayPal</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 23 Mar 2010 14:40:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.insidefacebook.com/2010/03/22/zynga-paypal%e2%80%99s-second-largest-merchant-in-2009/?utm_source=feedburner&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Feed%3A+InsideFacebook+%28Inside+Facebook%29&amp;utm_content=Google+Feedfetcher>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/03/23/social-games-player-zynga-is-2-on-paypal/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19410612/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/03/23/social-games-player-zynga-is-2-on-paypal/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>citigroup</category><category>eBay</category><category>facebook</category><category>FacebookApps</category><category>FacebookGames</category><category>inthenews</category><category>paypal</category><category>social game</category><category>social games</category><category>social media</category><category>social network</category><category>social networking</category><category>Zynga</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tom Johansmeyer]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 23 Mar 2010 14:40:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Financial Crisis Didn't Push Bankers from Industry, LinkedIn Reports]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/02/21/financial-crisis-didn-t-push-bankers-from-industry-linkedin-rep/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/02/21/financial-crisis-didn-t-push-bankers-from-industry-linkedin-rep/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/02/21/financial-crisis-didn-t-push-bankers-from-industry-linkedin-rep/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/internet/" rel="tag">Internet</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/c/" rel="tag">Citigroup Inc. (C)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/jpm/" rel="tag">JPMorgan Chase (JPM)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/bac/" rel="tag">Bank of America (BAC)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/gs/" rel="tag">Goldman Sachs Group (GS)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/bcs/" rel="tag">Barclays plc ADS (BCS)</a></p><p><img hspace="4" vspace="4" border="1" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2010/02/linkedin-logo.jpg" />The financial crisis, employment market and social media explosion have converged, providing a new level of clarity into what is happening in the world around us. Where was ground zero for this financial catastrophe? Well, <a href="http://blog.linkedin.com/2010/02/18/linkedin-analytics-financial/" target="_blank">according to the LinkedIn blog</a>, five companies have shown the most action: Barclays (<a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/barclays-plc/bcs/nys" target="_blank">BCS</a>), Credit Suisse (<a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/credit-suisse-group/cs/nys" target="_blank">CS</a>), Citigroup (<a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/citigroup-incorporated/c/nys" target="_blank">C</a>), Bank of America (<a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/bank-of-america-corporation/bac/nys" target="_blank">BAC</a>) and JPMorgan Chase (<a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/jpmorgan-chase-and-co/jpm/nys" target="_blank">JPM</a>). Interestingly, Goldman Sachs (<a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/the-goldman-sachs-group-inc/gs/nys" target="_blank">GS</a>), among the biggest winners now that we're pulling out from the recession, didn't see as much play.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/02/21/financial-crisis-didn-t-push-bankers-from-industry-linkedin-rep/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Financial Crisis Didn't Push Bankers from Industry, LinkedIn Reports</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/02/21/financial-crisis-didn-t-push-bankers-from-industry-linkedin-rep/">Financial Crisis Didn't Push Bankers from Industry, LinkedIn Reports</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Sun, 21 Feb 2010 15:10:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/02/21/financial-crisis-didn-t-push-bankers-from-industry-linkedin-rep/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19366607/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/02/21/financial-crisis-didn-t-push-bankers-from-industry-linkedin-rep/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>bac</category><category>Bank of America</category><category>Barclays</category><category>bcs</category><category>citigroup</category><category>credit suisse</category><category>CreditSuisse</category><category>cs</category><category>financial crisis</category><category>financial services</category><category>Goldman Sachs Group</category><category>inthenews</category><category>investment bankers</category><category>investment banking</category><category>investment banks</category><category>jp morgan chase</category><category>JPM</category><category>JpMorgan</category><category>Lehman Brothers</category><category>linkedin</category><category>LinkedIn.com</category><category>merrill lynch</category><category>Nomura</category><category>social media</category><category>social network</category><category>social networking sites</category><category>social networks</category><category>unemployment</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tom Johansmeyer]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 21 Feb 2010 15:10:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Facebook, Twitter and LinkedIn Release New Features with Revenue Implications]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/01/27/facebook-twitter-and-linkedin-release-new-features-with-revenue/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/01/27/facebook-twitter-and-linkedin-release-new-features-with-revenue/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/01/27/facebook-twitter-and-linkedin-release-new-features-with-revenue/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/competitive-strategy/" rel="tag">Competitive Strategy</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/goog/" rel="tag">Google (GOOG)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/technology/" rel="tag">Technology</a></p><p><img hspace="4" vspace="4" border="1" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2010/01/facebook-screen-240.jpg" />The three major social media sites have been pushing new tools out to their user communities aggressively over the past year. Each company has its own set of rumors, from IPOs to being on both sides of an acquisition. While the ultimate 2010 aims of <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/tag/Facebook/">Facebook</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/tag/Twitter/">Twitter</a> and <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/tag/LinkedIn/">LinkedIn</a> may not have been revealed to us yet, it is clear that all three are looking for ways to beef up revenue and demonstrate long-term viability.</p>
<p>Whether or not Facebook goes public this year, it's still pointed toward that ultimate goal. The 350-million member social network is focused on finding new sources of revenue and gaining better penetration into those it already has. Even if it's more than a year away, it's never too soon to start shoring up your financial statements for an IPO. The latest new feature from Facebook, which has been announcing enhancements fairly rapidly over the past few months, is targeted directly at advertisers, underscoring the importance that the company's attaching to revenue growth.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/01/27/facebook-twitter-and-linkedin-release-new-features-with-revenue/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Facebook, Twitter and LinkedIn Release New Features with Revenue Implications</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/01/27/facebook-twitter-and-linkedin-release-new-features-with-revenue/">Facebook, Twitter and LinkedIn Release New Features with Revenue Implications</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 27 Jan 2010 12:30:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/01/27/facebook-twitter-and-linkedin-release-new-features-with-revenue/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19333479/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/01/27/facebook-twitter-and-linkedin-release-new-features-with-revenue/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>facebook</category><category>featured</category><category>inthenews</category><category>ipo</category><category>linkedin</category><category>LinkedIn.com</category><category>social media</category><category>social network</category><category>social networking</category><category>social networking sites</category><category>social networks</category><category>SocialNetworkingSites</category><category>twitter</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tom Johansmeyer]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 27 Jan 2010 12:30:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Friendster to sell for $100 million]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/05/friendster-to-sell-for-100-million/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/05/friendster-to-sell-for-100-million/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/05/friendster-to-sell-for-100-million/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/internet/" rel="tag">Internet</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/goog/" rel="tag">Google (GOOG)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/china/" rel="tag">China</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/ms/" rel="tag">Morgan Stanley (MS)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/media-world/" rel="tag">Media World</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/technology/" rel="tag">Technology</a></p><p><img hspace="4" border="1" vspace="4" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2009/12/friendster1.jpg" />Does anyone remember <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/tag/Friendster/">Friendster</a>? For about ten minutes seven years ago, it was the hottest thing in    <span style="float: left; margin-right: 10px; margin-top: 7px;"><script> digg_url = 'http://digg.com/tech_news/Friendster_to_sell_for_100_Million_to_Undisclosed_Buyer'; </script> <script src=" http://digg.com/api/diggthis.js"></script></span>  <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/tag/socialnetworking/">social networking</a>. The site that effectively kicked off the social media movement didn't stay in vogue long, however, eventually riding a wave of user referrals to Asia. Meanwhile, MySpace, Facebook and Twitter came along, taking over the sector -- and the hype that comes with it. </p>
<p>Well, Friendster is worth something to somebody, it seems. The company is due to be <a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/idUSTRE5B25X020091204?type=technologyNews" target="_blank">sold at the end of the month for $100 million</a>. The social networking service is tops in Asia, which is where more than half of its 100 million-strong user base can be found.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/05/friendster-to-sell-for-100-million/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Friendster to sell for $100 million</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/05/friendster-to-sell-for-100-million/">Friendster to sell for $100 million</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Sat, 05 Dec 2009 15:40:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/05/friendster-to-sell-for-100-million/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19266617/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/05/friendster-to-sell-for-100-million/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>facebook</category><category>friendster</category><category>goog</category><category>google</category><category>inthenews</category><category>Morgan Stanley</category><category>ms</category><category>myspace</category><category>myspace.com</category><category>richard kimber</category><category>social media</category><category>social network</category><category>twitter</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tom Johansmeyer]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 05 Dec 2009 15:40:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[New Twitter features suggest ad-based financial future]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/08/new-twitter-features-suggest-ad-based-financial-future/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/08/new-twitter-features-suggest-ad-based-financial-future/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/08/new-twitter-features-suggest-ad-based-financial-future/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/internet/" rel="tag">Internet</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/goog/" rel="tag">Google (GOOG)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/msft/" rel="tag">Microsoft (MSFT)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/aapl/" rel="tag">Apple Inc (AAPL)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/media-world/" rel="tag">Media World</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/technology/" rel="tag">Technology</a></p><p><img  border="1" hspace="4" vspace="4" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2009/11/twitter-logo-200x150.jpg" alt="" />The <a href="http://twitter.com/bloggingstocks" target="_blank">Twitter</a> ecosystem may be changing constantly, but most of that comes on the back of individual developers and outside companies. They beat on Twitter APIs to create new products that may win them glory, recognition or cash. Over the past month, though, Twitter itself has gotten into the game, <a href="http://www.pcworld.com/article/181588/twitter_tries_luring_users_back.html" target="_blank">releasing or announcing a handful of new features</a>.</p>
<p>A new function for "retweeting" (echoing another's tweet to your own followers), changes to how trending topics are managed, and the ability to create lists are new tools intended to engage users ... on the <a href="http://twitter.com" target="_blank">Twitter.com website</a>. Considered within the context of Twitter's changed terms of service this year, the upgrades may be part of a broader ad-based revenue plan.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/08/new-twitter-features-suggest-ad-based-financial-future/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>New Twitter features suggest ad-based financial future</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/08/new-twitter-features-suggest-ad-based-financial-future/">New Twitter features suggest ad-based financial future</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Sun, 08 Nov 2009 10:10:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/08/new-twitter-features-suggest-ad-based-financial-future/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19227582/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/08/new-twitter-features-suggest-ad-based-financial-future/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>aapl</category><category>ad revenue</category><category>ad.ly</category><category>advertising</category><category>app store</category><category>apple</category><category>apple itunes</category><category>comscore</category><category>facebook</category><category>goog</category><category>google</category><category>inthenews</category><category>itunes</category><category>magpie</category><category>microblogging</category><category>microsoft</category><category>msft</category><category>online ads</category><category>online advertising</category><category>retweet</category><category>seesmic</category><category>social media</category><category>social network</category><category>trending topics</category><category>tweet</category><category>tweetdeck</category><category>tweets</category><category>twitter</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tom Johansmeyer]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2009 10:10:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Social media at work: not just a yes/no question any more]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/04/social-media-at-work-not-just-a-yes-no-question-any-more/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/04/social-media-at-work-not-just-a-yes-no-question-any-more/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/04/social-media-at-work-not-just-a-yes-no-question-any-more/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/internet/" rel="tag">Internet</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/sbux/" rel="tag">Starbucks (SBUX)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/bby/" rel="tag">Best Buy (BBY)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/media-world/" rel="tag">Media World</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/technology/" rel="tag">Technology</a></p><p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2009/06/twitter_logo_200.jpg" alt="" />Company attitudes toward <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/tag/socialmedia/">social media</a> sites vary. <a href="http://www.voanews.com/english/2009-11-03-voa71.cfm" target="_blank">Some swing the doors wide open</a>, allowing employees to tend to their <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/tag/Facebook/">Facebook</a> farms and update <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/tag/Twitter/">Twitter</a> statuses throughout the day. Others lock 'em down, keeping non-business site access to a minimum. </p>
<p>A recent study found that, in the United States, 77% of employees with Facebook accounts check in with the community from the office. And, the amount of time they're spending in this part of the online world is growing. In the United Kingdom, another study found that 57% log in regularly from work, costing their employers 40 minutes a day. </p>
<p>Philip Wicks, a consultant at Morse PLC, a technology research firm in London, "It isn't just something you can do for half an hour during a lunch break but all through the day and because of that, it has a huge impact because people aren't necessarily concentrating on what they should be doing during the day." He estimates that this translates to lost productivity of $2.25 billion a year. </p>
<p>It seems like the obvious move would be to block the sites, but William Beers of <a href="http://www.pwc.com/us/en/index.jhtml">Pr</a><a href="http://www.pwc.com" target="_blank">icewaterhouseCoopers</a> disagrees. "Instead of trying to shut it down, I think we should try to embrace these technologies, put in a nice policy that governs it and explain to users the risks related to it, provide some training and then see what business benefits we can have from it," he said.</p>
<p> </p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/04/social-media-at-work-not-just-a-yes-no-question-any-more/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Social media at work: not just a yes/no question any more</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/04/social-media-at-work-not-just-a-yes-no-question-any-more/">Social media at work: not just a yes/no question any more</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 04 Nov 2009 16:15:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.voanews.com/english/2009-11-03-voa71.cfm>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/04/social-media-at-work-not-just-a-yes-no-question-any-more/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19221610/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/04/social-media-at-work-not-just-a-yes-no-question-any-more/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>airlines</category><category>deloitte</category><category>deloitte touche tohmatsu</category><category>deloittetouche</category><category>DeloitteToucheTohmatsu</category><category>facebook</category><category>facebook games</category><category>FacebookGames</category><category>featured</category><category>linkedin</category><category>linkedin.com</category><category>london</category><category>london england</category><category>LondonEngland</category><category>pricewaterhousecoopers</category><category>pwc</category><category>social media</category><category>social network</category><category>social networking</category><category>SocialMedia</category><category>SocialNetwork</category><category>SocialNetworking</category><category>twitter</category><category>united kingdom</category><category>UnitedKingdom</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tom Johansmeyer]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 16:15:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Facebook shoots for search victory]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/16/facebook-shoots-for-search-victory/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/16/facebook-shoots-for-search-victory/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/16/facebook-shoots-for-search-victory/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/goog/" rel="tag">Google (GOOG)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/technology/" rel="tag">Technology</a></p><p><img border="1" hspace="4" alt="" vspace="4" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/01/facebook.jpg" />Modest goals don't seem to be on the agenda for <a href="http://www.facebook.com" target="_blank">Facebook</a>. Sheryl Sandberg, the company's chief operating officer, is shooting for <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/google-inc/goog/nas" target="_blank">Google</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/google-inc/goog/nas" target="_blank">GOOG</a>). The <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/tag/socialnetworking/">social networking</a> company seeks its ad market as <a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/ousivMolt/idUSTRE59F15Q20091016" target="_blank">rivaling (or even surpassing) Google's search ad market</a> in size. Facebook says it's on target to bring in $500 million in revenue this year (Sandberg didn't confirm it, though).</p>
<p>With its 300 million users, Sandberg has been trying to convince the world that her company has a solid business model in place. The perception that eyeballs don't necessarily equal dollars, born of the internet boom a decade ago, isn't necessarily true any more, as demonstrated by Google's ability to monetize <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/tag/search/">search</a> (and hit record profits) has demonstrated. For the third quarter of 2009, the search engine giant raked in net revenue of $4.38 billion.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/16/facebook-shoots-for-search-victory/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Facebook shoots for search victory</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/16/facebook-shoots-for-search-victory/">Facebook shoots for search victory</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 16 Oct 2009 12:20:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/16/facebook-shoots-for-search-victory/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19198295/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/16/facebook-shoots-for-search-victory/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>ad revenue</category><category>ads</category><category>advertising</category><category>facebook</category><category>featured</category><category>goog</category><category>google</category><category>inthenews</category><category>search engines</category><category>social network</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tom Johansmeyer]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 16 Oct 2009 12:20:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Photo Sharing vs Social Media: Who Wins?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/06/photo-sharing-vs-social-media-who-wins/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/06/photo-sharing-vs-social-media-who-wins/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/06/photo-sharing-vs-social-media-who-wins/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/goog/" rel="tag">Google (GOOG)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/msft/" rel="tag">Microsoft (MSFT)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/yhoo/" rel="tag">Yahoo! (YHOO)</a></p><p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.dailyfinance.com/media/2009/06/df-surprise-product-hits-facebook-200.jpg" alt="" />Have you ever looked at your <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/yahoo-inc/yhoo/nas">Yahoo!</a> (NASDAQ: <a target="_blank" href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/yahoo-inc/yhoo/nas">YHOO</a>) <a target="_blank" href="http://www.flickr.com/">Flickr</a> account and thought, "Why am I doing this? I can just throw my pics up on Facebook"? If this has crossed your mind, you're not alone. In fact, many photo-sharing sites - <a target="_blank" href="http://www.snapfish.com">Snapfish</a> (NYSE: <a target="_blank" href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/hewlett-packard-company/hpq/nys">HPQ</a>), <a target="_blank" href="http://www.photobucket.com">Photobucket</a>, <a target="_blank" href="http://www.picasa.com">Picasa</a> (NASDAQ: <a target="_blank" href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/google-inc/goog/nas">GOOG</a>) and Shutterfly, as well as Flickr - are asking the same questions. With the development and enhancement of photo management capabilities in major social networking websites, <a target="_blank" href="http://www.reuters.com/article/ousivMolt/idUSTRE5824TB20090903?pageNumber=2&amp;virtualBrandChannel=10522">niche players need to find new ways to stay relevant</a>. </p>
<p>The situation is still far from grim. Fed by traffic from their behemoth owners, the photo-sharing sites remain substantial forces, and they are currently home to more than 20 billion pictures. There's still plenty of interest in these environments ... which has been bolstered by specific features that make the likes of Flickr attractive to both professional photographers and amateur shooters. The ability to order prints and personalize portfolios, for example, still provides an edge over sites like <a target="_blank" href="http://www.facebook.com">Facebook</a> and <a target="_blank" href="http://www.myspace.com">MySpace</a> (NYSE: <a target="_blank" href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/newstar-financial-inc/news/nas">NEWS</a>). </p>
<p>Nonetheless, the threats from the social networking space are quite real. </p>
<p> </p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/06/photo-sharing-vs-social-media-who-wins/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Photo Sharing vs Social Media: Who Wins?</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/06/photo-sharing-vs-social-media-who-wins/">Photo Sharing vs Social Media: Who Wins?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Sun, 06 Sep 2009 19:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.reuters.com/article/ousivMolt/idUSTRE5824TB20090903?pageNumber=2&amp;virtualBrandChannel=10522>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/06/photo-sharing-vs-social-media-who-wins/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19152748/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/06/photo-sharing-vs-social-media-who-wins/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>facebook</category><category>flickr</category><category>goog</category><category>google</category><category>hewlett-packard</category><category>hp</category><category>hpq</category><category>microsoft</category><category>msft</category><category>myspace</category><category>photo</category><category>photobucket</category><category>photography</category><category>photos</category><category>picasa</category><category>snapfish</category><category>social media</category><category>social network</category><category>social networking</category><category>SocialMedia</category><category>SocialNetwork</category><category>SocialNetworking</category><category>yahoo</category><category>yhoo</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tom Johansmeyer]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 06 Sep 2009 19:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[What my Google Profile is going to say]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/12/16/what-my-google-profile-is-going-to-say/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/12/16/what-my-google-profile-is-going-to-say/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/12/16/what-my-google-profile-is-going-to-say/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/goog/" rel="tag">Google (GOOG)</a></p><p>In a somewhat-telegraphed move, the omnipresent <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/google-inc/goog/nas">Google</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/google-inc/goog/nas">GOOG</a>)<strong> </strong>is <a href="http://www.google.com/help/profile/">introducing public profiles</a> for its users' online identities. <a href="http://googlesystem.blogspot.com/2007/12/google-profiles.html">Google Operating System</a> had an interesting point, "It's not a stretch to see that these profiles are the perfect host for your activity streams and your public activities could become a part of the profile (uploading photos to a public album, bookmarking web pages, posting a new blog post)."</p>
<p>In addition to being able to share things with friends, this move is putting Google strikingly closer to the News Feed that <a href="http://www.facebook.com">Facebook </a>uses to keep users abreast of what others are doing in their networks.</p>
<p>With Gmail, GFinance, Search/Web History, Google AdSense, Checkout and Analytics on my blog, Calendar, and Google Chat, I'm a heavy Google user. Now, by connecting me with my friends, Google is on its way to creating a social network by aggregating all my web activities and allowing me to share them with others.</p>
<p>I think this is a stronger position for a social network than Facebook's closed garden approach. Facebook needs to have ex-Facebook activity in their network, but its Beacon system seems to have met with a lot of pushback from privacy groups. Google just will aggregate my activity where I'm actually doing it.</p>
<p>Oh, and my profile? <br /><br /><strong>*******************<br />Zack Miller<br /></strong><a href="http://www.israelnewsletter.com">Analyst from Jerusalem</a><br /><br /><strong>About Zack:<br /></strong>Backing the truck up to load up on the GOOG!<br /><strong>********************<br /></strong><br /><em>Zack Miller is the managing editor of <a href="http://www.israelnewsletter.com/">IsraelNewsletter.com </a>and a former equity analyst for a leading multinational hedge fund. Author is long GOOG stock.</em></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/12/16/what-my-google-profile-is-going-to-say/">What my Google Profile is going to say</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Sun, 16 Dec 2007 18:10:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/12/16/what-my-google-profile-is-going-to-say/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1064017/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/12/16/what-my-google-profile-is-going-to-say/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>facebook</category><category>goog</category><category>google</category><category>online profile</category><category>social network</category><category>social networking</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Zack Miller]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 16 Dec 2007 18:10:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Wal-Mart: so, like, totally, not cool]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/07/24/wal-mart-so-like-totally-not-cool/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/07/24/wal-mart-so-like-totally-not-cool/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/07/24/wal-mart-so-like-totally-not-cool/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/bad-news/" rel="tag">Bad News</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/consumer-experience/" rel="tag">Consumer Experience</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/magazines/" rel="tag">Magazines</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/wmt/" rel="tag">Wal-Mart (WMT)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/marketing-and-advertising/" rel="tag">Marketing and Advertising</a></p><p><img id="vimage_1" alt="walmart, are you cool?" hspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2006/07/walmart_notcool.jpg" align="right" vspace="4" border="1" />I was once a teenager. Really. And I think I was, well, kind of uncool. I was actually a cheerleader, which was totally<em> not </em>cool in the late 80s and early 90s. I wore acid-wash jeans and shoulder pads and penny loafers, which <em>were</em> cool. Then.</p>
<p>So when I tell you that this new Wal-Mart thing is uncool, I should know. Because it looks a lot like me, in 1987. That girl on the left here, in one of the videos on Wal-Mart's new <a href="http://schoolyourway.walmart.com/index.php/">The Hub social networking site</a> for teens, she looks eerily like my best friend, Courtney. Wearing the exact same clothes. Let me say this: in 2006, that is not a good thing.</p>
<p>No, Wal-Mart isn't showing video from the 80s. It's trying to become some cool locale for tweens and teens. You know, where they can discuss fashion and music and -- well, probably not sex. As <a href="http://wmt.bloggingstocks.com/2006/07/18/wal-mart-becoming-a-competitor-to-myspace/">Brian White pointed out last week</a>, there are so many rules about what teens can do with the home pages the company hopes they will create on the MySpace-type The Hub, why would any cool, edgy teen want to play here? To show off their facility navigating the fashion wasteland of the retail giant's stores?</p>
<p><a href="http://adage.com/columns/article.php?article_id=110673">According to Bob Garfield of <em>Advertising Age</em></a>, "If well-executed, such an effort might cultivate individual users, gather market intelligence on the group, destigmatize Wal-Mart as a declasse purveyor of unfashionable clothing and establish a beachhead on the web for the fast-approaching digital future ... [but] it's totally not well-executed. It's the most not-well-executed ever."</p>
<p> "We shouldn't tuck anything in, it's so not cool anymore," says the pink-tee and acid-wash-jeans clad "Ashley" on her featured video (clearly not produced, or written, by a teenaged girl named "Ashley"). Nope. And neither are you, Wal-Mart.</p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/07/24/wal-mart-so-like-totally-not-cool/">Wal-Mart: so, like, totally, not cool</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 24 Jul 2006 17:52:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://adage.com/columns/article.php?article_id=110673>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/07/24/wal-mart-so-like-totally-not-cool/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/646453/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/07/24/wal-mart-so-like-totally-not-cool/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>ashley</category><category>demographic</category><category>social network</category><category>social networking</category><category>SocialNetwork</category><category>SocialNetworking</category><category>teen</category><category>teenagers</category><category>teens</category><category>the hub</category><category>TheHub</category><category>wal-mart</category><category>walmart</category><category>walmart social network</category><category>walmart the hub</category><category>WalmartSocialNetwork</category><category>WalmartTheHub</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Sarah Gilbert]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 24 Jul 2006 17:52:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Social networks the new darling of media giants]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/05/30/social-networks-the-new-darling-of-media-giants/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/05/30/social-networks-the-new-darling-of-media-giants/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/05/30/social-networks-the-new-darling-of-media-giants/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/industry/" rel="tag">Industry</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/conventions-and-conferences/" rel="tag">Conventions and Conferences</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/newspapers/" rel="tag">Newspapers</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/goog/" rel="tag">Google (GOOG)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/yhoo/" rel="tag">Yahoo! (YHOO)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/twx/" rel="tag">Time Warner (TWX)</a></p><p>MySpace may be the space of the moment, receiving praise, aplomb and (most importantly) <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/05/30/myspace-com-the-top-source-of-search-traffic-to-google/">generating traffic to Google in ever-greater numbers</a>, but it's not even the middle of the social network craze. Really, the whole social network effect, as a theory and a technological practicality, started with the personal web sites of the early nineties. Personal web sites beget blogs beget networking sites like <a href="http://www.orkut.com">Orkut </a>and <a href="http://www.linkedin.com">LinkedIn</a> beget <a href="http://www.myspace.com">MySpace</a>, <a href="http://start.aimpages.com/">AIM Pages</a>, <a href="http://www.youtube.com">YouTube</a>, and whatever's to come next.</p>
<p>Thanks to a <a href="http://news.ft.com/cms/s/2d524b0a-ef4b-11da-b435-0000779e2340.html">effort by white shoe management consultancy McKinsey</a> to get the great minds of YouTube, Yahoo! and the like together with the old garde of the gigantic media (and I'm asking myself, and <a href="http://mediakit.bolt.com/about/management.php">Aaron Cohen of Bolt Media</a>, who was interviewed as a person of knowledge for the <em>Financial Times</em> piece: whither side of the old/new divide does Time Warner fall?), social networking is now coming into the good graces of the giants of Wall Street and Hollywood and Madison Avenue and all those places where fashion and money meet the people.</p>
<p><a href="http://gigaom.com/2006/05/29/social-networks-are-the-new-media/">Robert Young, writing for GigaOm</a>, calls MySpace the "it girl," and describes the infatuation with "her" and her&nbsp;groupies this way: "nearly every media company and venture capital fund on the planet is out on the dance floor stumbling over one another to see if they can identify the next breathless social networking beauty." </p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/05/30/social-networks-the-new-darling-of-media-giants/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Social networks the new darling of media giants</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/05/30/social-networks-the-new-darling-of-media-giants/">Social networks the new darling of media giants</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 30 May 2006 13:13:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://gigaom.com/2006/05/29/social-networks-are-the-new-media/>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/05/30/social-networks-the-new-darling-of-media-giants/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/623157/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/05/30/social-networks-the-new-darling-of-media-giants/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>aimspace</category><category>goog</category><category>google</category><category>linkedin</category><category>mckinsey</category><category>media</category><category>myspace</category><category>networking sites</category><category>NetworkingSites</category><category>orkut</category><category>social network</category><category>social networking</category><category>social networking sites</category><category>social networks</category><category>SocialNetwork</category><category>SocialNetworking</category><category>SocialNetworkingSites</category><category>SocialNetworks</category><category>time warner</category><category>TimeWarner</category><category>twx</category><category>yahoo</category><category>yahoo!</category><category>yhoo</category><category>youtube</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Sarah Gilbert]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 30 May 2006 13:13:00 EST</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
