<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd">
<channel>
<title>BloggingStocks</title>
<link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com</link>
<description>BloggingStocks</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Is Transformers worthy of a franchise?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/07/09/is-transformers-the-movie-worthy-of-a-franchise/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/07/09/is-transformers-the-movie-worthy-of-a-franchise/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/07/09/is-transformers-the-movie-worthy-of-a-franchise/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/launches/" rel="tag">Launches</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/industry/" rel="tag">Industry</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/via/" rel="tag">Viacom (VIA)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/media-world/" rel="tag">Media World</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/film/" rel="tag">Film</a></p><a href="http://www.theflyonthewall.com/splashPage.php?source=AOL"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/07/aol-fly-logo.gif" /></a>Last week <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/07/02/is-transformers-more-than-meets-the-eye/">I blogged </a>about the premiere of the long-awaited <em>Transformers </em>movie and how Susan Linn, a psychologist who co-founded the Campaign for a Commercial-Free Childhood, said the movie was improperly marketed towards children. <br /><br />While Ms. Lind's complaint fell on deaf ears, <em>Transformers </em>rocked the box-office this week with $67.6M in the box office in its first weekend and $152.5M worldwide since its opening one-week ago today - beating the original <em>Spider-Man</em> with the biggest first-week revenues for a non-sequel. <br /><br /><a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB118391388444960197.html?mod=mm_media_marketing_hs_left">The Wall Street Journal </a>believes the <em>Transformers </em>debut, which research firm Merriman Curhan Ford &amp; Co said was nearly twice as strong as the studio's expectations; has a strong chance of hitting $300M in domestic ticket sales. <br /><br />Could this summer hit become a franchise?<br /><br /><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/viacom-inc-cl-a/via/nys">Viacom, Inc.</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/viacom-inc-cl-a/via/nys">VIA</a>)'s Paramount has been without a new franchise in nearly a decade. With key cast members Shia LaBeouf and others already optioned for another movie, will <em>Transformers </em>be their first? The answer has to be yes: <em>Transformers 2</em> is slated for 2009, according to <a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt1055369/">IMDB.com</a>. Producer Lorenzo di Bonaventura is already in talks with director Michael Bay, who kept the movie down to a $150M price-tag, half the cost of Pirates and Spider-Man sequels.<br /><br />Paramount has gone without a franchise for ten years and now has the opportunity to have three by 2008. The other potentials: <a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0416236/"><em>The Spiderwick Chronicles</em></a>, directed by Mark Waters, and a new version of <em><a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0796366/">Star Trek</a></em> directed by J.J. Abrams, although that's already an established brand name. Sadly, neither of these directors compares to Michael Bay and his re-creation of the <em>Transformers</em>, but the potential for a franchise is there.<br /><br />While <em>Transformers </em>fans will wait in agony over the next two years for a sequel, Viacom's Paramount looks to be sitting pretty with dreams of being in franchise heaven. Keep an eye on the big screen to find out if Paramount's dreams come ever true.<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/07/09/is-transformers-the-movie-worthy-of-a-franchise/">Is Transformers worthy of a franchise?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 09 Jul 2007 18:09:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/07/09/is-transformers-the-movie-worthy-of-a-franchise/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/936290/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/07/09/is-transformers-the-movie-worthy-of-a-franchise/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>film</category><category>imdb</category><category>michael bay</category><category>MichaelBay</category><category>paramount</category><category>pirates</category><category>spider man</category><category>spideriwck</category><category>SpiderMan</category><category>star trek</category><category>StarTrek</category><category>theflyonthewall.com</category><category>transformers</category><category>transformers 2</category><category>Transformers2</category><category>via</category><category>viacom</category><category>wsj</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Kevin Shult]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 09 Jul 2007 18:09:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Evan Almighty's arc just sank]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/06/25/evan-almightys-arc-just-sank/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/06/25/evan-almightys-arc-just-sank/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/06/25/evan-almightys-arc-just-sank/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/bad-news/" rel="tag">Bad News</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/industry/" rel="tag">Industry</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/consumer-experience/" rel="tag">Consumer Experience</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/ge/" rel="tag">General Electric (GE)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/twx/" rel="tag">Time Warner (TWX)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/dis/" rel="tag">Walt Disney (DIS)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/via/" rel="tag">Viacom (VIA)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/sne/" rel="tag">Sony Corp ADR (SNE)</a></p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/06/23/what-happens-if-universal-pictures-evan-almighty-flops/"><img align="right" style="width: 183px; height: 123px;" alt="" src="http://www.tublogdecine.es/wp-content/themes/Cinestar2/img/almighty.bmp" />I recently blogged</a> about my concerns if <span style="font-style: italic;">Evan Almighty</span> flopped this weekend.<br /><br />I, as well as many others, would classify the $32.1 million opening weekend of <span style="font-style: italic;">Evan as </span>a flop. <a style="font-style: italic;" href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB118270646516746291.html?mod=home_whats_news_us">Peter Sanders of the WSJ </a>believes that <span style="font-style: italic;">Evan Almighty</span> was the first "major pothole" in Hollywood's sequel-filled summer. He also put <span style="font-style: italic;">Evan </span>in the same category as <span style="font-style: italic;">Spider-Man 3, Shrek the Third and Pirates of the Caribbean: At World's End</span>, by saying May's blockbuster "threequels" were all expected to fall short of their previous domestic sales numbers. <br /><br />Could that be true? <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB118270646516746291.html?mod=home_whats_news_us">Looking at the numbers,</a> Sanders has a good argument. That's only if you thought sequels should outperform the original. Other than <span style="font-style: italic;">Shrek II,</span> most of the recent sequels made less than its predecessors. Even the Harry Potter franchise couldn't make a sequel that outperformed the $317.5 million earned from <span style="font-style: italic;">Sorcerer's Stone</span>.<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/06/25/evan-almightys-arc-just-sank/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Evan Almighty's arc just sank</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/06/25/evan-almightys-arc-just-sank/">Evan Almighty's arc just sank</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 25 Jun 2007 19:50:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/06/25/evan-almightys-arc-just-sank/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/926349/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/06/25/evan-almightys-arc-just-sank/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>bourne</category><category>bruce almighty</category><category>BruceAlmighty</category><category>carell</category><category>dis</category><category>disney</category><category>evan almighty</category><category>EvanAlmighty</category><category>ge</category><category>general electric</category><category>GeneralElectric</category><category>harry potter</category><category>HarryPotter</category><category>hollywood</category><category>hot rod</category><category>HotRod</category><category>lasseter</category><category>mummy</category><category>narnia</category><category>paramount</category><category>pirates</category><category>pixar</category><category>sequel</category><category>shadyac</category><category>shrek</category><category>sisterhood</category><category>sne</category><category>sony</category><category>sorcerer's stone</category><category>Sorcerer'sStone</category><category>spider man</category><category>SpiderMan</category><category>steve jobs</category><category>SteveJobs</category><category>superbad</category><category>Time Warner</category><category>TimeWarner</category><category>TWX</category><category>universal pictures</category><category>UniversalPictures</category><category>VIA</category><category>viacom</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Kevin Shult]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 25 Jun 2007 19:50:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Shrek 3 could bring movie theaters back into favor]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/05/07/shrek-3-could-bring-movie-theaters-back-into-favor/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/05/07/shrek-3-could-bring-movie-theaters-back-into-favor/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/05/07/shrek-3-could-bring-movie-theaters-back-into-favor/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/good-news/" rel="tag">Good news</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/industry/" rel="tag">Industry</a></p><a href="http://www.theflyonthewall.com/splashPage.php?source=AOL"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/05/fly-logo-(aol).gif" alt="" /></a><em>Shrek 3</em> and <em>Spider-Man 3</em> are coming to a movie theater near you, just as the sector is coming out of an ugly downturn. <br /><br />Overcapacity and over-leverage had led to an ogre-ish performance causing theater operators to file for bankruptcy or get picked up by private equity.<br /><br />Now theater companies are going public or emerging from bankruptcy with little fanfare. However, according to Buzz Zaino, long-time great stock picker at Royce Opportunity Fund, it is time to start looking at these stocks again. In <a href="http://online.barrons.com/article/SB117832073812892812-search.html?KEYWORDS=zaino&amp;COLLECTION=barrons/6month">Barron's fund-manager interview</a> (subscription required), Zaino said box-office receipts are up 7.2% year-to-date with a summer of good new releases expected to keep the momentum going.<br /><br /><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/carmike-cinemas-inc/ckec/nas">Carmike Cinemas Inc</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/carmike-cinemas-inc/ckec/nas">CKEC</a>) looks particularly attractive since it has upgraded 75% of its screens to digital, on which, in addition to showing movies, new alternative concepts are expected to generate additional revenue. Other movie chains Zaino likes are <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/regal-entertainment-group-cl-a/rgc/nys">Regal Entertainment Group</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/regal-entertainment-group-cl-a/rgc/nys">RGC</a>) and <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/cinemark-holdings-inc/cnk/nys">Cinemark Holdings Inc</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/cinemark-holdings-inc/cnk/nys">CNK</a>).<br /><br />Expected improvements in box-office receipts should lead to nice incremental EBITDA margins especially for Carmike since its theater upgrade is mostly completed.<br /><br />Few have mentioned theater stocks as a place to invest in. Zaino is one of the best at find long-forgotten industries as fundamentals are on the upswing. This ogre of an industry appears ready to return some princely profits to shareholder.<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/05/07/shrek-3-could-bring-movie-theaters-back-into-favor/">Shrek 3 could bring movie theaters back into favor</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 07 May 2007 13:05:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/05/07/shrek-3-could-bring-movie-theaters-back-into-favor/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/890485/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/05/07/shrek-3-could-bring-movie-theaters-back-into-favor/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>barron's</category><category>barrons</category><category>carmike</category><category>cinema</category><category>cinemark</category><category>ckec</category><category>cnk</category><category>interview</category><category>movie</category><category>regal</category><category>rgc</category><category>shrek</category><category>spider man</category><category>spider-man</category><category>SpiderMan</category><category>theater</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Eric Buscemi]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 07 May 2007 13:05:00 EST</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
