<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd">
<channel>
<title>BloggingStocks</title>
<link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com</link>
<description>BloggingStocks</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Tom Brady Spurns Nike for Under Armour]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/11/09/tom-brady-spurns-nike-for-under-armour/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/11/09/tom-brady-spurns-nike-for-under-armour/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/11/09/tom-brady-spurns-nike-for-under-armour/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/nke/" rel="tag">NIKE, Inc'B' (NKE)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/ua/" rel="tag">Under Armour'A' (UA)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/analysis/" rel="tag">Technical Analysis</a></p><img width="240" vspace="4" hspace="4" height="153" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2009/07/underarmour220.gif" alt="" />Interesting development in the world of football sponsorships, as New England Patriots quarterback <a href="http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/g/a/2010/11/08/prwebprweb4758374.DTL" target="_blank">Tom Brady decided to leave</a> Nike (<a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/nike-inc/nke/nys" target="_blank">NKE</a>) and jump ship to Under Armour (<a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/under-armour-inc/ua/nys" target="_blank">UA</a>). This is a rather interesting decision for Brady, as NKE is a true heavyweight in the world of performance athletic apparel. But Brady's jump to UA shows that the company is here to stay. <br />
<br />
Brady is set to appear in different in-store and advertising promotional campaigns. As part of the new deal, Brady will wear UA apparel and footwear while training and he will debut the new UA Fierce cleat.<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/11/09/tom-brady-spurns-nike-for-under-armour/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Tom Brady Spurns Nike for Under Armour</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/11/09/tom-brady-spurns-nike-for-under-armour/">Tom Brady Spurns Nike for Under Armour</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 09 Nov 2010 11:30:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/11/09/tom-brady-spurns-nike-for-under-armour/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19708877/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/11/09/tom-brady-spurns-nike-for-under-armour/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>endorsement</category><category>endorsements</category><category>featured</category><category>football</category><category>inthenews</category><category>Nike</category><category>nke</category><category>sponsorship</category><category>Tom Brady</category><category>ua</category><category>Under Armour</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark Fightmaster]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 09 Nov 2010 11:30:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Study: Tiger Woods Scandal Cost His Sponsors up to $12 Billion]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/29/study-tiger-woods-scandal-cost-his-sponsors-up-to-12-billion/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/29/study-tiger-woods-scandal-cost-his-sponsors-up-to-12-billion/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/29/study-tiger-woods-scandal-cost-his-sponsors-up-to-12-billion/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/pep/" rel="tag">PepsiCo (PEP)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/marketing-and-advertising/" rel="tag">Marketing and Advertising</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/t/" rel="tag">AT and T (T)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/pg/" rel="tag">Procter and Gamble (PG)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/nke/" rel="tag">NIKE, Inc'B' (NKE)</a></p><p><img border="1" hspace="4" alt="" vspace="4" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2009/12/gatorade-logo-240.jpg" />So, it isn't bad enough that Tiger Woods ruined his marriage and soiled his squeaky-clean reputation. Apparently he <a href="http://blogs.wsj.com/deals/2009/12/28/how-tiger-woods-destroyed-12-billion-of-stock-market-value/" target="_blank">cost his corporate sponsors $12 billion in stock value</a> as well. According to a <a href="http://www.news.ucdavis.edu/search/printable_news.lasso?id=9352&amp;table=news" target="_blank">study conducted by UC Davis economics professors Victor Stango and Christopher Knittel</a>, Tiger lost his sponsors a "collective $5 to $12 billion." This loss outpaces "several decades' worth of Tiger Woods' personal endorsement income." </p>
<p>The study examined the stock market returns during the 13 trading days after Tiger's car crash, a period concluding a week after Tiger's announcement of an indefinite leave of absent. The two economics professors then compared the returns for Tiger's sponsors during this 13-day period to those of the total stock market and each of the companies' closest competitor. Returns for the four years prior to the car accident were also taken into account in order to establish the stocks' historic performance.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/29/study-tiger-woods-scandal-cost-his-sponsors-up-to-12-billion/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Study: Tiger Woods Scandal Cost His Sponsors up to $12 Billion</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/29/study-tiger-woods-scandal-cost-his-sponsors-up-to-12-billion/">Study: Tiger Woods Scandal Cost His Sponsors up to $12 Billion</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 29 Dec 2009 13:30:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/29/study-tiger-woods-scandal-cost-his-sponsors-up-to-12-billion/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19296765/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/29/study-tiger-woods-scandal-cost-his-sponsors-up-to-12-billion/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>academic studies</category><category>Accenture</category><category>ACN</category><category>AT and T</category><category>celebrity endorsements</category><category>Christopher Knittel</category><category>Conde Nast</category><category>EA Sports</category><category>featured</category><category>Gatorade</category><category>Gillette</category><category>Golf Digest</category><category>Nike</category><category>NKE</category><category>PEP</category><category>PepsiCo</category><category>PG</category><category>Procter and Gamble</category><category>sponsors</category><category>sponsorship</category><category>Tiger Woods</category><category>TLC Laser Eye Centers</category><category>Victor Stango</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark Fightmaster]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 29 Dec 2009 13:30:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Can the Tiger Woods situation impact Nike?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/30/can-the-tiger-woods-situation-impact-nike/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/30/can-the-tiger-woods-situation-impact-nike/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/30/can-the-tiger-woods-situation-impact-nike/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/columns/" rel="tag">Columns</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/nke/" rel="tag">NIKE, Inc'B' (NKE)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/business-of-sports/" rel="tag">Business of Sports</a></p><p><img border="1" hspace="4" alt="" vspace="4" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2009/11/tiger-woods-200x150.jpg" />Okay, so everyone is weighing on the Tiger Woods incident over the holiday weekend. As a "business of sports blogger," it's my turn to toss in my two cents. First things first, whatever you think <a href="http://sports.espn.go.com/golf/news/story?id=4699907">happened early on Friday morning</a>, Tiger has asked for privacy and respect, so I will not participate in the rumor-mongering taking place across the Internet.</p>
<p>What is interesting is that people are forgetting to look at what this could do for his biggest sponsor, Nike (<a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/nike-inc/nke/nys">NKE</a>). Now, I am not saying that any stock trouble that Nike may experience is the fault of the little incident between (or involving) Tiger and Mrs. Tiger, but the company will be performing a bit of damage control, just as Tiger and crew have.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/30/can-the-tiger-woods-situation-impact-nike/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Can the Tiger Woods situation impact Nike?</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/30/can-the-tiger-woods-situation-impact-nike/">Can the Tiger Woods situation impact Nike?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 30 Nov 2009 12:20:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/30/can-the-tiger-woods-situation-impact-nike/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19258084/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/30/can-the-tiger-woods-situation-impact-nike/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>featured</category><category>inthenews</category><category>Nike</category><category>NKE</category><category>sponsorship</category><category>technical analysis</category><category>Tiger Woods</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark Fightmaster]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 30 Nov 2009 12:20:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Procter &amp; Gamble tops profit estimates, announces NFL tie-in]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/08/05/procter-and-gamble-tops-profit-estimates-announces-nfl-tie-in/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/08/05/procter-and-gamble-tops-profit-estimates-announces-nfl-tie-in/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/08/05/procter-and-gamble-tops-profit-estimates-announces-nfl-tie-in/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/earnings-reports/" rel="tag">Earnings Reports</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/pg/" rel="tag">Procter and Gamble (PG)</a></p><p><img border="1" hspace="4" vspace="4" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/10/procter-and-gamble-pg-logo.gif" alt="" />Cincinnati-based consumer products giant <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/the-procter-and-gamble-company/pg/nys">Procter &amp; Gamble</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/the-procter-and-gamble-company/pg/nys">PG</a>) reported <a href="http://money.aol.com/rtn/pr/pandg-fiscal-year-and-fourth-quarter-eps-exceed-expectations/rfid238719017?channel=pf">fourth-quarter earnings this morning</a>, topping the Street's expectations on earnings but missing on revenue. </p>
<p>As for earnings, P&amp;G pulled in 80 cents per share in the fourth quarter, topping the consensus estimate by a penny. On the revenue front, PG made $18.66 billion in the fourth quarter, well short of the Street's expected $19.32 billion.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/08/05/procter-and-gamble-tops-profit-estimates-announces-nfl-tie-in/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Procter &amp; Gamble tops profit estimates, announces NFL tie-in</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/08/05/procter-and-gamble-tops-profit-estimates-announces-nfl-tie-in/">Procter &amp; Gamble tops profit estimates, announces NFL tie-in</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 05 Aug 2009 10:30:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/08/05/procter-and-gamble-tops-profit-estimates-announces-nfl-tie-in/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19119748/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/08/05/procter-and-gamble-tops-profit-estimates-announces-nfl-tie-in/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>featured</category><category>Febreeze</category><category>Gillette</category><category>Head Shoulders</category><category>inthenews</category><category>NFL</category><category>Old Spice</category><category>PG</category><category>Procter Gamble</category><category>sponsorship</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark Fightmaster]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 05 Aug 2009 10:30:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[JockStocks: Fred Perry knows its boundaries, lets Nike make Murray's footwear]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/03/jockstocks-fred-perry-knows-its-boundaries-lets-nike-make-mur/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/03/jockstocks-fred-perry-knows-its-boundaries-lets-nike-make-mur/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/03/jockstocks-fred-perry-knows-its-boundaries-lets-nike-make-mur/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/nke/" rel="tag">NIKE, Inc'B' (NKE)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/business-of-sports/" rel="tag">Business of Sports</a></p><p><img border="1" hspace="4" alt="" vspace="4" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/09/nikeswoosh.gif" />So, we are approaching the final semifinal match to set the men's Wimbledon finals. Americans will be rooting for Andy Roddick while Britain will be rooting for Andy Murray (a native Scotsman). The last time a Brit won Wimbledon was in 1936, when Fred Perry accomplished the feat. What is interesting is that <a href="http://www.cnbc.com/id/31685450">Fred Perry is a sponsor of Andy Murray</a>, and the company stands to make a pretty penny should Murray win Wimbledon. That said, the article I linked to by Darren Rovell brings up an interesting point - how much money is Fred Perry losing because Andy Murray wears <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/nike-inc-cl-b/nke/nys">Nike</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/nike-inc-cl-b/nke/nys">NKE</a>) shoes?</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/03/jockstocks-fred-perry-knows-its-boundaries-lets-nike-make-mur/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>JockStocks: Fred Perry knows its boundaries, lets Nike make Murray's footwear</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/03/jockstocks-fred-perry-knows-its-boundaries-lets-nike-make-mur/">JockStocks: Fred Perry knows its boundaries, lets Nike make Murray's footwear</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 03 Jul 2009 15:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/03/jockstocks-fred-perry-knows-its-boundaries-lets-nike-make-mur/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19086226/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/03/jockstocks-fred-perry-knows-its-boundaries-lets-nike-make-mur/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>andy murray</category><category>andy roddick</category><category>fred perry</category><category>inthenews</category><category>Nike</category><category>NKE</category><category>sponsorship</category><category>sponsorships</category><category>tennis</category><category>wimbledon</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark Fightmaster]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 03 Jul 2009 15:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Would Michael Phelps's compromising picture mean less sponsorships?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/03/would-michael-phelpss-compromising-picture-mean-less-sponsorshi/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/03/would-michael-phelpss-compromising-picture-mean-less-sponsorshi/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/03/would-michael-phelpss-compromising-picture-mean-less-sponsorshi/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/marketing-and-advertising/" rel="tag">Marketing and Advertising</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/k/" rel="tag">Kellogg Co (K)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/v/" rel="tag">Visa Inc. (V)</a></p><img hspace="4" align="right" vspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/03/visa.jpg" alt="" />Maybe you have heard, maybe you haven't. Olympic hero and NBC posterboy Michael Phelps got caught in flagrante delicto with a marijuana pipe at a party after the Olympic Games had completed. So, of course his sponsors are jumping ship left and right to distance themselves from this scofflaw, right? Wrong ... and somewhere, Cheech and Chong are smiling. <br /><br />It appears that the sponsors are going to stand by their man, from Speedo to Parenting magazine. In fact, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/search/?q=Visa%20%28NYSE%3A%20V%29">Visa</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/search/?q=Visa%20%28NYSE%3A%20V%29">V</a>) came out Tuesday and stated that it supports Phelps despite his little misstep. <a href="http://www.businessweek.com/ap/financialnews/D963NUD00.htm ">According to Visa</a>, the company has "spoken with Michael and he has expressed regret for the situation, has committed to being accountable and improving his judgment in the future ... We intend to support him as he looks to move forward."<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/03/would-michael-phelpss-compromising-picture-mean-less-sponsorshi/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Would Michael Phelps's compromising picture mean less sponsorships?</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/03/would-michael-phelpss-compromising-picture-mean-less-sponsorshi/">Would Michael Phelps's compromising picture mean less sponsorships?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 03 Feb 2009 19:15:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/03/would-michael-phelpss-compromising-picture-mean-less-sponsorshi/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1449150/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/03/would-michael-phelpss-compromising-picture-mean-less-sponsorshi/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>k</category><category>kellogg</category><category>michael phelps</category><category>MichaelPhelps</category><category>olympics</category><category>scandal</category><category>sponsor</category><category>sponsorship</category><category>v</category><category>visa</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark Fightmaster]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 03 Feb 2009 19:15:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Not so fast Under Armour, you're being sued by the Chicago Cubs]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/26/not-so-fast-under-armour-youre-being-sued-by-the-chicago-cubs/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/26/not-so-fast-under-armour-youre-being-sued-by-the-chicago-cubs/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/26/not-so-fast-under-armour-youre-being-sued-by-the-chicago-cubs/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/ua/" rel="tag">Under Armour'A' (UA)</a></p><img align="right" alt="" src="http://chicago.cubs.mlb.com/images/2007/02/15/QJq2yf5W.jpg" />Perhaps this is a post-season tilt that the Cubbies may actually be able to win. Sorry Chicago, but this blogger is a dyed-in-the-wool Cincinnati Reds fan ... and I love to take cheap shots at the competition whenever I can. <br /><br />You see, the Cubs are suing <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/ua/nys">Under Armour, Inc.</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/ua/nys">UA</a>) for breach of contract (check out <a href="http://www.sportsonesource.com">SportsOneSource Media</a> for the heads up). The UA logo is emblazoned on the left-center and right-center field doors embedded in the iconic ivy walls of Wrigley Field. <p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/26/not-so-fast-under-armour-youre-being-sued-by-the-chicago-cubs/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Not so fast Under Armour, you're being sued by the Chicago Cubs</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/26/not-so-fast-under-armour-youre-being-sued-by-the-chicago-cubs/">Not so fast Under Armour, you're being sued by the Chicago Cubs</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 26 Jan 2009 17:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/26/not-so-fast-under-armour-youre-being-sued-by-the-chicago-cubs/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1440348/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/26/not-so-fast-under-armour-youre-being-sued-by-the-chicago-cubs/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>business of sports</category><category>BusinessOfSports</category><category>Chicago Cubs</category><category>ChicagoCubs</category><category>lawsuit</category><category>Major League Baseball</category><category>MajorLeagueBaseball</category><category>sponsorship</category><category>ua</category><category>Under Armour</category><category>UnderArmour</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark Fightmaster]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 26 Jan 2009 17:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Finally, they'll come for NASCAR]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/23/finally-theyll-come-for-nascar/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/23/finally-theyll-come-for-nascar/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/23/finally-theyll-come-for-nascar/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/competitive-strategy/" rel="tag">Competitive Strategy</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/f/" rel="tag">Ford Motor (F)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/gm/" rel="tag">General Motors (GM)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/marketing-and-advertising/" rel="tag">Marketing and Advertising</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/business-of-sports/" rel="tag">Business of Sports</a></p><p><a href="http://www.nascar.com/2008/news/opinion/11/14/splash.go.rswan.ford.hybrid/index.html" target="_blank"><img alt="NASCAR pace car" hspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/11/pace.car.193.jpg" align="right" vspace="4" border="0" /></a>Many of today's "investors" place their bets on the stock market's wheel of fortune. They hope that their number will come up. I have news for those stock players: the majority of their ranks are no longer true investors. They are gamblers, plain and simple.</p>
<p>Would those gamblers like a hot tip? Here's one in keeping with today's economic defeatist attitude. I suggest that they immediately dump shares they hold in anything that's associated with motor racing. The reasoning for my saying this is simple: NASCAR has a measurable carbon footprint.</p>
<p>Please understand that I'm playing the devil's advocate here. I myself have nothing against motor sports.</p>
<p>NASCAR has already made one move towards a green future by introducing <a href="http://www.nascar.com/2008/news/opinion/11/14/splash.go.rswan.ford.hybrid/index.html">a new hybrid pace car</a>. However, that's not going to cut it for the peak oil crowd. Additionally, this week the government announced its disdain for corporate America, with the curt dismissal of Detroit executives by a Pelosi-led crowd. We must also consider that advertising money is drying up, and with that, may go some sponsorships. NASCAR is in dangerous waters, and I believe that the sharks are circling.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/23/finally-theyll-come-for-nascar/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Finally, they'll come for NASCAR</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/23/finally-theyll-come-for-nascar/">Finally, they'll come for NASCAR</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Sun, 23 Nov 2008 13:40:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/23/finally-theyll-come-for-nascar/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1380319/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/23/finally-theyll-come-for-nascar/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>advertising</category><category>carbon footprint</category><category>Ford</category><category>General Motors</category><category>GM</category><category>hybrid</category><category>NASCAR</category><category>sponsor</category><category>sponsorship</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Gary Sattler]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 23 Nov 2008 13:40:00 EST</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
