Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc. (NYSE: LEH) Chief Executive Richard Fuld, Wall Street's longest serving CEO, has no reason to fear being ousted if he can't turn around the company around. In fact, on some level, he may welcome it because he stands to reap more than $241 million.

Fuld, who has been Lehman's chief executive since 1993, and other members of Lehman's senior management team do not have employment contracts or change in control bonus arrangements, according to the company's most recent proxy statement. He is also declining a bonus for this year for obvious reasons. Nonetheless, his turnaround effort announced this morning, which includes slashing Lehman's dividend by 93%, selling a 55% stake in its investment management division and a spin-off the vast majority of its commercial real estate assets into a public company, got a mixed reception on Wall Street.

Shares of the New York-based company, which fell 45% yesterday, tumbled in pre-market trading. They later rebounded following Lehman's conference call which Fuld personally oversaw. But as my colleague Peter Cohan noted, the company's earnings, which were issued a week early, were even more awful than Wall Street expected. The company reported a preliminary net loss of $3.9 billion, or $5.92 a share. Net revenue was a negative $2.9 billion.

Democratic presidential candidate Barack Obama today sharply criticized the pay packages given to the departing chief executives of Fannie Mae (NYSE: FNM) and Freddie Mac (NYSE: FRE).

Obama told reporters that he wrote letters to Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson and Federal Housing Finance Agency Director James Lockhart stating that "it would be unacceptable for executives of these institutions to earn a windfall at a time when U.S. Treasury has taken unprecedented steps to rescue these companies with taxpayer resources," according to CNBC.

He's absolutely right.

Yes, I realize that compared with the fallen CEOs of Wall Street, the pay packages are chump change. Fannie Chief Executive Daniel Mudd is 'only' getting around $9.3 million and his counterpart at Freddie Mac Richard Syron stands to receive $14.1 million. But just because Mudd and Syron are getting less than 10% of the $160 million parting gift awarded to Stan O'Neal for ruining Merrill Lynch & Co. (NYSE: MER) does not make them any less egregious.

Pity the hapless ex-CEO who has to explain to the U.S. Congress how he got millions for failing at his job. It's like the person in the horror movie who doesn't realize that a bad guy is lurking in the dark woods even though that's clearly indicated by the scary music. In this case, the knife-wielding psycho Jason Voorhees is being played by Rep. Henry "I haven't met a microphone I didn't like" Waxman (D-CA).

What did former Countywide Financial Corp. (NYSE: CFC) Chief Executive Angelo Mozilo, former Citigroup Inc. (NYSE: C) CEO Charles Prince and former Merrill Lynch & Co. (NYSE: MER) head Stan O'Neal expect to happen? That they would finally be able to tell their "side" of the story? That they would be able to counteract media perceptions that they are a bunch of greedy pigs who were rewarded for their incompetence? Apparently, these once mighty kings of the boardroom were that deluded.

Mozilo was the most outrageous, telling the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform that, "In short, as our company did well, I did well." The Wall Street Journal (subscription required) noted that Waxman, who locked horns recently with baseball great Roger Clemens, wasn't buying it.