<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd">
<channel>
<title>BloggingStocks</title>
<link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com</link>
<description>BloggingStocks</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Why aren't there more 'sells' on the New York Times?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/11/28/why-arent-there-more-sells-on-the-new-york-times/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/11/28/why-arent-there-more-sells-on-the-new-york-times/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/11/28/why-arent-there-more-sells-on-the-new-york-times/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/marketing-and-advertising/" rel="tag">Marketing and Advertising</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/nyt/" rel="tag">New York Times'A' (NYT)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/stocks-to-sell/" rel="tag">Stocks to Sell</a></p>Predictably, shares of the <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/the-new-york-times-company/nyt/nys">New York Times Co</a>. (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/the-new-york-times-company/nyt/nys">NYT</a>) are down more than 2% today after Bank of America put a "sell" rating on the newspaper publisher, citing a potential downturn in advertising from luxury advertisers and from financial services companies in New York and Boston.<br /><br />Analyst Joe Arns slashed his price target by 33% to $21 as he believes the company's earnings before interest, taxes depreciation and amortizations could be 19% below Wall Street's consensus forecasts assuming a "mild recession," according to <a href="http://www.marketwatch.com/news/story/new-york-times-cut-sell/story.aspx?guid=%7BC40BE81A-1C7F-438F-A0B1-2D8FF65ECA2D%7D">MarketWatch</a>.<br /><br />While I agree with Arns' analysis, like most analysts he is a day late and a dollar short. Wall Street has put a "sell" rating on the stock a long time ago. Shares of the New York-based publisher are down more than 33% for the year even though the company posted <strong><a href="http://biz.yahoo.com/ap/071023/earns_ny_times.html?.v=10">BETTER-THAN-EXPECTED</a></strong> third quarter results. The stock trades under the $19.50 median target of analysts surveyed by Thomson Financial.<br /><br />My hunch is that newspaper publishers are such a low priority for Wall Street firms that they could care less whether or not their ratings are the least bit timely.<br /><br />Note: I have done freelance writing for the <em>New York Times </em>and <em>Boston Globe</em>.<br /><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/11/28/why-arent-there-more-sells-on-the-new-york-times/">Why aren't there more 'sells' on the New York Times?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 28 Nov 2007 14:13:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.marketwatch.com/news/story/new-york-times-cut-sell/story.aspx?guid=%7BC40BE81A-1C7F-438F-A0B1-2D8FF65ECA2D%7D>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/11/28/why-arent-there-more-sells-on-the-new-york-times/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1049993/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/11/28/why-arent-there-more-sells-on-the-new-york-times/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>inthenews</category><category>new york times</category><category>newspaper publishers</category><category>NewspaperPublishers</category><category>NewYorkTimes</category><category>nyt</category><category>stock ratings</category><category>StockRatings</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jonathan Berr]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 28 Nov 2007 14:13:00 EST</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
