<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd">
<channel>
<title>BloggingStocks</title>
<link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com</link>
<description>BloggingStocks</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[History: Watch for stocks to start moving higher]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/01/20/history-watch-for-stocks-to-start-moving-higher/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/01/20/history-watch-for-stocks-to-start-moving-higher/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/01/20/history-watch-for-stocks-to-start-moving-higher/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/international-markets/" rel="tag">International Markets</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/personalfinance/" rel="tag">Personal Finance</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/sandp-500/" rel="tag">S and P 500</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/recession/" rel="tag">Recession</a></p><p>There is a very interesting article in today's <a href="http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/html/businesstechnology/2004135025_emotion20.html"><em>Seattle Times</em></a>. With stock investors getting more jittery with each passing day, it's important to put the recent market turmoil in some kind of historical perspective. </p>
<p>"Recessions on average last 216 days, or just over seven months, and stocks post an average 8.64 percent decline during the first half of the pullback, according to Citigroup data dating back to 1953."</p>
<p>It's important to keep in mind that the markets topped in late October, which means that we are about half way through the current economic softening. We are also much farther down than the average 8.64% decline, as we are almost double that in term of broad market losses.</p>
<p>So why be optimistic?</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/01/20/history-watch-for-stocks-to-start-moving-higher/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>History: Watch for stocks to start moving higher</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/01/20/history-watch-for-stocks-to-start-moving-higher/">History: Watch for stocks to start moving higher</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Sun, 20 Jan 2008 15:10:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/01/20/history-watch-for-stocks-to-start-moving-higher/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1091630/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/01/20/history-watch-for-stocks-to-start-moving-higher/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Bespoke</category><category>buy stocks</category><category>Citigroup</category><category>inthenews</category><category>optimism</category><category>recession</category><category>stock sell off</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Aaron Katsman]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 20 Jan 2008 15:10:00 EST</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
