AOL Money & Finance

stocks posts

Americans should turn to Canada for outsized returns

Canadian stocks are set to give American investors a twofer. As stocks go up, Gordon Pape, one of Canada's leading experts on mutual funds and the editor of The Canada Report, says that Americans get stock appreciation and a currency bonus – making investing in Canadian stocks more profitable than U.S. stocks.
And now, says Pape, is an especially good time to invest since stocks and the Canadian dollar have recently taken a breather.

We caught up with Gordon Pape to talk to him about earning market profits plus a currency bonus.

Continue reading Americans should turn to Canada for outsized returns

Comfort Zone Investing: Stops and starts ... partly steam ahead!

On Monday the Dow Jones Industrial Average dropped more than 200 points before closing a little better. No real reason for it. Pundits suggested the drop in commodity prices (oil and gold were down a little, not enough to comment on) were the reason for the dip, suggesting the economy may not be as robust nor inflation as big a problem as thought on the Friday before.

But here's the real scoop: the market has rallied well beyond a level where economic numbers justify.

Continue reading Comfort Zone Investing: Stops and starts ... partly steam ahead!

Comfort Zone Investing: Is it too late ... or too early to buy stocks?

The stock market, as measured by the Dow Jones Industrial Average, sharply rebounded from its low of 6440 in March of this year. Currently, as this is written, the notable index is hovering around 8400. That's an increase of 30%. Not bad for two months of trading. While the average is made up of only 30 stocks, those 30 stocks are some of the best. There are also some real losers, such as General Motors (NYSE: GM) and Citigroup (NYSE: C). But for the most part, the index contains the strongest industries with some of the strongest stocks. With that kind of recovery already in place, is it too late to buy stocks or is this just the start of a major rally?

Continue reading Comfort Zone Investing: Is it too late ... or too early to buy stocks?

Comfort Zone Investing: Good times coming for investors?

Most CEOs expect things to get worse. Chief Executive Officers of major U.S. corporations were more pessimistic than three months ago about their business and the economy over the next six months, the Business Roundtable reported last Tuesday. The CEO confidence index fell to negative 5.0 in the first quarter from 16.8 in the fourth quarter. It was at 79.5 a year ago. The CEOs expect the economy to contract 1.9% in 2009. Over the next six months, about two-thirds of CEOs expect lower sales, lower capital spending and fewer jobs at their company. About a quarter expect sales to rise in the next six months, while less than 10% expect to increase hiring or capital spending.

Continue reading Comfort Zone Investing: Good times coming for investors?

Comfort Zone Investing: That pinball feeling

Ted Allrich is the founder of The Online Investor and author of the book: Comfort Zone Investing: Build Wealth and Sleep Well at Night. In this weekly column, he'll offer advice to investors who are just getting started.

Lately I've looked in vain for good news. I mean news that has some substance, that would make a real difference to an investor. I can't find any. In fact, I feel like a pinball, bouncing from one rubber post to another, each one accelerating the downward, inevitable path toward the black hole at the bottom of the board.

Continue reading Comfort Zone Investing: That pinball feeling

Traders with higher in-womb testosterone make six times more money

Is this science or science fiction? That thought came to mind when I read that traders who were exposed to more testosterone in the womb made six times more money than their low-testosterone-level peers on very volatile trading days. So if you want to breed a trader, expose him to lots of testosterone in the womb. How do you do that? Beats me.

To determine the traders' prenatal testosterone exposure, University of Minnesota researchers measured their "2D:4D ratio" which is the relative lengths of the index and ring fingers on the right hand. Those exposed to higher levels of testosterone in the womb tend to have relatively longer ring fingers.

Based on the 2D:4D measure, researchers who studied the traders' profits over a 20-month period between 2004 and 2007, found that those with the highest in-womb testosterone exposure in the womb earned six times more than those exposed to the least. They also tended to have the longest careers, surviving about three years longer on average.

Continue reading Traders with higher in-womb testosterone make six times more money

Why investors should use stop-losses

Last year global stock markets lost $29 trillion in value -- falling 42%. And although it does not get much media attention, there is something that investors can do when the stock market moves against them. They can set stop losses on their stocks which limit how much money they can lose. Specifically, if an investor buys a stock at, say, $20 a share, he or she can issue a limit order which requires the broker to sell the stock when it declines to a lower price, say, $18. Such a limit order would limit the investor's loss to 10%.

This comes to mind in considering why the average stock in my investment newsletter gained 15% in 2008 when the S&P 500 fell 38.5%. My monthly newsletter analyzes broad economic trends and bores into specific industries. It also picks three stocks each month for subscribers to consider. During the first half of 2008, the energy and commodities stocks mentioned boosted its performance to +29% through the end of June. Then the bottom began to fall out as commodity prices tumbled and the financial services industry collapsed.

Thanks to the 2% stop loss rule -- which automatically sells any stock that falls 2% below the price at which it was mentioned in the newsletter -- the low point for the year was -1% at the end of October. By the end of 2008, only four of the 36 stocks mentioned remained in the portfolio. However, thanks to a surprising boost in one stock mentioned at the end of October and the three stocks picked at the end of November, the average stock was up 15% by the end of 2008. What were the three best performers?

Continue reading Why investors should use stop-losses

Investor sues the SEC over Madoff losses

New York retiree Phyllis Molchatsky lost nearly $2 million in Bernard Madoff's alleged Ponzi scheme -- and she's as mad as hell and not going to take it anymore.

Realizing that suing Mr. Madoff won't lead anywhere, she's trying an innovative strategy: suing the Securities & Exchange Commission, alleging that the SEC was negligent in failing to detect and put a stop to the financial crime in progress. Ms. Molchatsky filed an administrative claim for relief, and if the SEC doesn't respond or negotiate within six months, she will have the option of suing the Commission in federal court.

SEC Chairman Christopher Cox has already admitted that the SEC failed to respond to specific and credible allegations of wrongdoing by Mr. Madoff over the years and said that he was "gravely concerned by the apparent multiple failures over at least a decade to thoroughly investigate these allegations."

Still, experts say it will be an uphill battle to win any damages from the SEC. As Law Professor Gregory Sisk said (subscription required) in The Wall Street Journal, "The government undoubtedly would argue that if liability is imposed here it creates a disincentive for the government to do any regulation in the future."

Of course the SEC screwed up badly here, but that's nothing new. If the SEC were held responsible for losses incurred as a result of its many failures to do its job, the damages would make the $700 billion bailout look like a breakfast buffet at Friendly's.

Continue reading Investor sues the SEC over Madoff losses

Before the Bell: Will Santa think investors are naughty or nice?

Will Santa bring investors toys or a lump of coal today? The picture is a little murky.

Stock futures are pointing to a slightly higher open and investors await new economic later today that is expected to show that the economy continues to be weak. Economists expect final Gross Domestic Product figures released later this morning by the Commerce Department to show a decline of 0.5% in the July through September quarter, according to the Associated Press. Reports on new home sales scheduled to be released today are expected to show declines.

Meanwhile, falling oil prices are pushing down stocks in Europe even though the U.K. economy posted its worst third quarter since 1990. Markets in Asia fell amid investors' concerns about interest rate cuts in China and Toyota Motor Corp.'s (NYSE: TM) first quarterly loss in 70 years. Bloomberg News is reporting that Toyota is considering cutting its North American payroll.c

In the U.S., all eyes will be on the housing market. Investors will be looking for some reason to be optimistic. That may be tough. According to the Wall Street Journal, record-low interest rates is spurring a wave of refinancing and not home purchases. Home resales appeared to stabilize in the fall but that was because of record levels of foreclosures.

"Ivy Zelman, chief executive of housing-research firm Zelman & Associates, estimates that, even with such a low rate, only about 67% of U.S. households can afford a house," the paper said. "Home ownership was nearly 68% in the third quarter, according to the Census Bureau, implying there is virtually no untapped demand for homes."

Santa's nice list may be small this year.

'Stuff' stocks look cheap?: Caterpillar, Freeport McMoRan, PACCAR

This post was written by Minyanville contributor Vitaliy Katsenelson.

"You should buy Freeport McMoRan (NYSE: FCX), Caterpillar (NYSE: CAT), PACCAR (NASDAQ: PCAR)." That is what I hear from friends of mine, who are in the biz, all the time. They tell me how cheap these stocks are -- three, six, eight times earnings. "You are a value guy! How come you are not loading up on them?" they ask.

Let me tell you when I'll buy "stuff" stocks (if I ever do, because I've never really cared for the cyclicality of that business). It's when everyone stops telling me how cheap they are and that they are "buys."

These stocks are very similar to housing stocks two years ago: housing stocks were down 50% and looked cheap. Value managers bought just to see their stocks get cut in half again and again.

One needs to subnormalize earnings in this environment for all stocks, but stuff stocks need to see their earnings to be "sub-sub-sub-sub normalized." I've said it before, but it is worth repeating: the global economy just started its journey into a recession, and demand for stuff will drop off the cliff most likely to a lot greater degree than anyone imagines.

Continue reading 'Stuff' stocks look cheap?: Caterpillar, Freeport McMoRan, PACCAR

Where you should put your money now: 10 options, starting with the safest

Investors are scared. The value of their portfolios has plummeted. Now many are seeking safety instead of returns.

If you are one of those investors, you need to understand the different levels of security in the options available to protect you.

But first, ask whether capital preservation is really the right goal for you.

If you anticipate needing 20% or more of your assets within a five year period, you should not have any exposure to the stock market. You need the confidence of knowing your money will be there when you need it. You cannot afford the kind of market volatility we are experiencing that could cause you to sell at a loss to pay living expenses.

You have a number of choices outside the stock market. As with all investments, you are rewarded for taking risk. Remember: The most secure choices will pay the lowest interest.

The liquidity crunch is having unprecedented ramifications in markets that were traditionally regarded as very safe. Many financial experts now regard only cash and debt secured by the full faith and credit of the U.S. government as really safe.

Continue reading Where you should put your money now: 10 options, starting with the safest

Should you sell into today's rally? Yes, if you think there are more surprises to come (I do)

The current financial crisis differs from the Great Depression in many respects. At the moment, the most significant difference is that central banks around the world are moving fast to try to stop the problem from getting worse. Stocks in Asia and Europe are rallying and futures point to a higher opening in the U.S.


Should you sell into this rally? Maybe. It depends on whether you think the world's finance ministers have solved the problem.

What are European central banks doing? The UK is injecting $64 billion into three large banks -- Royal Bank of Scotland Group Plc, HBOS Plc, and Lloyds TSB Group -- European governments agreed to guarantee new bank debt until the end of 2009, and the U.S. is coordinating with Europe to offer unlimited dollars to ease the credit crunch.

How are markets reacting? In Asia, stocks rose -- Hong Kong's Hang Seng index surged 7.5% while Sydney's S&P/ASX 200 index rose 5.6%. Things are looking up in Europe as well -- London's FTSE 100 index and Paris's CAC-40 are both up 5.4% and S&P 500 futures suggest a 6% gain in the U.S. What will the U.S. do?

Continue reading Should you sell into today's rally? Yes, if you think there are more surprises to come (I do)

Did speculators cause oil's $25 one-day price jump?

Oil jumps more than $25 in one day and a chorus rises to 'stamp out speculators'.

But are speculators at the core of the problem? And if so, would reducing speculation lower oil prices?

Economist David H. Wang argues that speculators "may in fact be boosting oil's price" and a partial solution may be to require commodity traders to deposit more money per futures contract, thus reducing the number of speculators. That should lead to smaller price moves for oil, he said.

However, Wang cautioned, that reduction in speculators will also lead to smaller price moves to the downside if and when oil's bearish fundamentals become the market's major concern.

Oil: "The sexiest asset in town"

Continue reading Did speculators cause oil's $25 one-day price jump?

As Dow rebounds somewhat off lows, caution is advised

As of midday Monday, the Dow had rebounded off early-session lows, but if investors / readers are thinking about entering this market now, caution is advised, for several reasons.

First, those familiar with technical analysis know that the Dow's rebound to a loss of 180 points to a level of about 11,233, up from a loss of more than 300 points, could be just short-covering.

Second, major unknowns exist regarding the financial system. And I mean major.

The fate of American Interational Group (NYSE: AIG) remains an enormous question mark. The largest insurer of assets, AIG may face a downgrade that would trigger a collateral call from debt investors who bought credit default swaps, a form of insurance for bonds. Further, if hedge and other institutional investors sense those swaps are not in force, they may seek swaps elsewhere and/or sell assets to reduce market risk / raise capital. That could spark a new round of stock selling. AIG's shares fell $5.33 to $6.81 in late Monday morning trading.

Continue reading As Dow rebounds somewhat off lows, caution is advised

Eighth straight monthly job loss shows everything is not fine with U.S. economy

Political science empirical research teaches us that when U.S. unemployment is rising and job losses occur over many months, the political party in charge of the White House will have a difficult presidential election. (See: The American Voter, by Campbell, Converse, Miller, and Stokes.)

Federal statisticians will release one more jobs report, the September jobs report in October, but to-date the trend is not one of U.S. economic health.

The U.S. Labor Department announced Friday that the U.S. economy lost another 84,000 jobs in August, with the unemployment rising to 6.1% - - a five-year high.

The U.S. economy has now lost 605,000 jobs in 2008 after creating just 1.1 million in 2007. Economist David H. Wang told BloggingStocks Friday the U.S. economy is not growing.

'U.S. economy headed in wrong direction'


"The U.S. economy is in recession. We don't have to wait for two-quarter date to confirm it. These are very bad numbers and the economy is headed in the wrong direction," Wang said. "Electioneering attempts aside, the U.S. economy is, objectively, in bad shape and anyone who fails to see this fails to recognize reality."

Continue reading Eighth straight monthly job loss shows everything is not fine with U.S. economy

Next Page >

Symbol Lookup
IndexesChangePrice
DJIA-36.658,146.52
NASDAQ+3.481,756.03
S&P 500-3.55879.13

Last updated: July 11, 2009: 06:06 AM

BloggingStocks Exclusives

Hot Stocks

DailyFinance Headlines

Latest from BloggingBuyouts

WalletPop Headlines

AOL Business News

BioHealth Investor Headlines

Sponsored Links

My Portfolios

Track your stocks here!

Find out why more people track their portfolios on AOL Money & Finance then anywhere else.

BloggingStocks Partners

More from AOL Money & Finance