<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd">
<channel>
<title>BloggingStocks</title>
<link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com</link>
<description>BloggingStocks</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Closing Bell: Slight Climb Throughout the Day (GE)]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/07/23/closing-bell-slight-climb-throughout-the-day-ge/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/07/23/closing-bell-slight-climb-throughout-the-day-ge/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/07/23/closing-bell-slight-climb-throughout-the-day-ge/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/ge/" rel="tag">General Electric (GE)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/sandp-500/" rel="tag">S and P 500</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/djia/" rel="tag">DJIA</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/nasdaq/" rel="tag">NASDAQ</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/08/bell-green.jpg" />Trading for the day started slowly. As is true most summer Fridays, there was not much news and few earnings announcements. Those who had to work on Wall Street spent the morning waiting for stress test data on European banks. The data was due at noon and there were no surprises. Seven smaller financial firms out of 91 did not make the cut. None of the firms was considered strategically important.<br />
<br />
The S&amp;P did move about 1,100, a sign that the movement up in the market has been steady enough to move above a psychological hurdle. But, the move was on so little volume that early Monday will be a better barometer of the market's sentiment.<br />
<br />
The numbers:<br />
<br />
Dow 10,424.62 +102.32 (0.99%) <br />
S&amp;P 500 1,102.66 +8.99 (0.82%) <br />
Nasdaq 2,269.47 +23.58 (1.05%)<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/07/23/closing-bell-slight-climb-throughout-the-day-ge/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Closing Bell: Slight Climb Throughout the Day (GE)</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/07/23/closing-bell-slight-climb-throughout-the-day-ge/">Closing Bell: Slight Climb Throughout the Day (GE)</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 23 Jul 2010 17:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/07/23/closing-bell-slight-climb-throughout-the-day-ge/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19566736/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/07/23/closing-bell-slight-climb-throughout-the-day-ge/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>GE</category><category>sp</category><category>stress tests</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Douglas McIntyre]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 23 Jul 2010 17:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Lie #1: The Stress Tests Provided Transparency in the Banks]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/26/lie-1-the-stress-tests-provided-transparency-in-the-banks/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/26/lie-1-the-stress-tests-provided-transparency-in-the-banks/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/26/lie-1-the-stress-tests-provided-transparency-in-the-banks/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/bad-news/" rel="tag">Bad News</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/financial-crisis/" rel="tag">Financial Crisis</a></p><p><em><img border="0" hspace="4" alt="Lie #1 -- The stress tests provided transparency in the banks" vspace="4" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2009/12/bank.jpg" width="160" height="213" />"The effect of this capital assessment will be to help replace uncertainty with transparency. ... We chose a strategy to lift the fog of uncertainty over bank balance sheets and to help ensure that the major banks, individually and collectively, had the capital to continue lending even in a worse-than-expected recession."</em> -- Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner, May 2009</p>
<p>These tests did NOT bring transparency to the banking sector. They were practically <em>designed</em> to prove the banks were fine, and simply ignored off-balance-sheet and other dodgy assets. It was as if they were saying, "We will do whatever it takes (even lie) to make sure the big banks do not fail since Congress won't give us more money to fix them."</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/26/lie-1-the-stress-tests-provided-transparency-in-the-banks/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Lie #1: The Stress Tests Provided Transparency in the Banks</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/26/lie-1-the-stress-tests-provided-transparency-in-the-banks/">Lie #1: The Stress Tests Provided Transparency in the Banks</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Sat, 26 Dec 2009 10:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/26/lie-1-the-stress-tests-provided-transparency-in-the-banks/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19292291/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/26/lie-1-the-stress-tests-provided-transparency-in-the-banks/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Citigroup</category><category>financial sector</category><category>financials</category><category>Michael Shulman</category><category>stress tests</category><category>wall street lies</category><category>Wells Fargo</category><category>WFC</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Michael Shulman]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 26 Dec 2009 10:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[2009's Biggest Wall Street Lies ]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/26/2009s-biggest-wall-street-lies/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/26/2009s-biggest-wall-street-lies/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/26/2009s-biggest-wall-street-lies/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/bad-news/" rel="tag">Bad News</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/china/" rel="tag">China</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/black-friday/" rel="tag">Black Friday</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/palm/" rel="tag">Palm Inc (PALM)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/smartphones/" rel="tag">Smartphones</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/housing/" rel="tag">Housing</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/federal-reserve/" rel="tag">Federal Reserve</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/recession/" rel="tag">Recession</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/financial-crisis/" rel="tag">Financial Crisis</a></p><p><img hspace="4" height="213" border="0" width="160" vspace="4" align="right" alt="2009's Biggest Wall Street Lies " src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2009/12/chartglasses.jpg" />The market staged an impressive rally this year, but it was predicated on some very big lies, as opposed to solid fundamentals    <span style="float: left; margin-right: 10px; margin-top: 7px;"><script> digg_url = 'http://digg.com/business_finance/2009_s_Biggest_Wall_Street_Lies'; </script> <script src=" http://digg.com/api/diggthis.js"></script></span>  or the beginnings of a real recovery in the U.S. economy.</p>
<p>The biggest lie investors were fed? That, statistically, the recession "officially" ended in Q3 when we saw 3.5% GDP growth. Sure the Bureau of Economic Analysis revised their number substantially in November, saying we only saw 2.8% growth, but this was growth nonetheless ... according to the statistics.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/26/2009s-biggest-wall-street-lies/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>2009's Biggest Wall Street Lies </em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/26/2009s-biggest-wall-street-lies/">2009's Biggest Wall Street Lies </a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Sat, 26 Dec 2009 08:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/26/2009s-biggest-wall-street-lies/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19292296/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/26/2009s-biggest-wall-street-lies/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>china</category><category>credit crisis</category><category>featured</category><category>financials</category><category>Michael Shulman</category><category>palm</category><category>recession</category><category>stress tests</category><category>unemployment</category><category>wall street lies</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Michael Shulman]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 26 Dec 2009 08:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[What is the good and the bad about the condition of our banks?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/06/12/what-is-the-good-and-the-bad-about-our-banks/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/06/12/what-is-the-good-and-the-bad-about-our-banks/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/06/12/what-is-the-good-and-the-bad-about-our-banks/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/press-releases/" rel="tag">Press Releases</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/financial-crisis/" rel="tag">Financial Crisis</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/06/wall-street-subway-sign.jpg" alt="" />  What is <a href="http://www.businessweek.com/magazine/content/09_25/b4136020116655.htm?campaign_id=headlines_daily">the real condition of our banks</a>? Well depends on which glass you are looking at. Is it half full or half empty? Let's look at the good news first:
<ul>
    <li>Profits for the bans are up. </li>
    <li>Bank stocks are surging. </li>
    <li>The U.S. government gave 10 banks permission to pay back $70 billion of TARP monies. </li>
    <li>Since January, banks have raised $200 billion and sold $75 billion in debt. </li>
    <li>Stress tests showed that 19 of the biggest banks needed only $75 billion to withstand a tougher than expected recession. </li>
    <li>In a press conference, U.S. Treasury Geithner said, "these are early signs of repair and improvement."</li>
</ul><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/06/12/what-is-the-good-and-the-bad-about-our-banks/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>What is the good and the bad about the condition of our banks?</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/06/12/what-is-the-good-and-the-bad-about-our-banks/">What is the good and the bad about the condition of our banks?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 12 Jun 2009 14:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/06/12/what-is-the-good-and-the-bad-about-our-banks/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19065676/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/06/12/what-is-the-good-and-the-bad-about-our-banks/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>bank stocks</category><category>banks</category><category>Douglas Elliot</category><category>FDIC</category><category>Geithner</category><category>Marvin J. Miller</category><category>stress tests</category><category>TARP</category><category>toxic assets</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Connie Madon]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 12 Jun 2009 14:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Why are traders short selling bank stocks?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/05/04/why-are-traders-short-selling-bank-stocks/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/05/04/why-are-traders-short-selling-bank-stocks/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/05/04/why-are-traders-short-selling-bank-stocks/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/mandftoday/" rel="tag">Money and Finance Today</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/federal-reserve/" rel="tag">Federal Reserve</a></p><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/citigroup-incorporated/c/nys"><img hspace="4" border="1" align="right" vspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/02/wallstpic.jpg" alt="" /></a><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/citigroup-incorporated/c/nys">The short sellers are back in force.</a>
<p> </p>
<ul>
    <li>Short selling in <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/citigroup-incorporated/c/nys">Citigroup</a> (NYSE <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/citigroup-incorporated/c/nys">C</a>) is up six fold since February 27 </li>
    <li>Short sales for <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/bank-of-america-corporation/bac/nys">Bank of America Corp</a> (NYSE<a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/bank-of-america-corporation/bac/nys"> BAC</a>), <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/metlife-inc/met/nys">Met Life</a> (NYSE<a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/metlife-inc/met/nys"> MET</a>) and <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/american-express-company/axp/nys">Amercian Express Co</a> (NYSE <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/american-express-company/axp/nys">AXP</a>) are up 40%</li>
    <li>Short sales for 18 banks are twice as high on April 15 as they were at their peak last year in July </li>
</ul>
<p>You are probably asking why is this happening? Overall, investors are seeing that the process of "stress tests" is not being managed well. When there is uncertainty, investors prefer the short side to protect their other long positions. </p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/05/04/why-are-traders-short-selling-bank-stocks/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Why are traders short selling bank stocks?</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/05/04/why-are-traders-short-selling-bank-stocks/">Why are traders short selling bank stocks?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 04 May 2009 14:30:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601109&amp;sid=aAbmnwDjaZ1s&amp;refer=home>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/05/04/why-are-traders-short-selling-bank-stocks/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1535835/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/05/04/why-are-traders-short-selling-bank-stocks/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>BAC</category><category>bank stress tests causing short selling</category><category>BankStressTestsCausingShortSelling</category><category>C</category><category>inthenews</category><category>short selling</category><category>ShortSelling</category><category>stress tests</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Connie Madon]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 04 May 2009 14:30:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Citigroup may turn to private investors]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/05/04/citigroup-may-turn-to-private-investors/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/05/04/citigroup-may-turn-to-private-investors/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/05/04/citigroup-may-turn-to-private-investors/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/c/" rel="tag">Citigroup Inc. (C)</a></p><p><img hspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/12/another_citigroup_logo.jpg" align="right" vspace="4" border="1" alt="" />Days ahead of the release of the bank stress test results, reports have surfaced that <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/citigroup-incorporated/c/nys">Citigroup</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/citigroup-incorporated/c/nys">C</a>) <a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&amp;sid=a2ePKLgUWpG8&amp;refer=home">may attempt to raise capital</a> from private investors rather than take more U.S. bailout funds. Such a move could strengthen the firm's equity without giving the government more control. </p>
<p>Although the results of the test haven't been released, it is widely known that Citigroup is considered one of the banks that will need to raise cash to continue (some reports state more than $10 billion). <br /></p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/05/04/citigroup-may-turn-to-private-investors/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Citigroup may turn to private investors</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/05/04/citigroup-may-turn-to-private-investors/">Citigroup may turn to private investors</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 04 May 2009 08:30:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/05/04/citigroup-may-turn-to-private-investors/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1535545/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/05/04/citigroup-may-turn-to-private-investors/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>bank bailout</category><category>BankBailout</category><category>capital infusion</category><category>CapitalInfusion</category><category>government bailout</category><category>GovernmentBailout</category><category>inthenews</category><category>raising capital</category><category>RaisingCapital</category><category>stress tests</category><category>StressTests</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark Fightmaster]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 04 May 2009 08:30:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Barney Frank doesn't get it: Stress tests are just the tip of the iceberg]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/04/16/barney-frank-doesnt-get-it-stress-tests-are-just-the-tip-of-th/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/04/16/barney-frank-doesnt-get-it-stress-tests-are-just-the-tip-of-th/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/04/16/barney-frank-doesnt-get-it-stress-tests-are-just-the-tip-of-th/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/politics/" rel="tag">Politics</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/financial-crisis/" rel="tag">Financial Crisis</a></p><p>We hear the name of Barney Frank quite often. He is Chairman of the House Financial Services Committee. His <a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&amp;sid=atpi4NaIiZVI&amp;refer=home">latest mantra is for more transparency</a> in the recent bank "stress tests."</p>
<p>What is so hard to believe is how naive Barney Frank really is. Doesn't he know that we have an underground banking system that regulators do not even touch. The underground banking system is comprised of all the "off-the-books" transactions like CDSs, CDOs, CLOs and all means of convoluted deals that are losing money and do not even show up on "stress tests." For example, <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/jpmorgan-chase-and-co/jpm/nys">JP Morgan Chase &amp; Co</a>. (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/jpmorgan-chase-and-co/jpm/nys">JPM</a>) is holding <a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601109&amp;sid=a96UdT6uCOcA&amp;refer=home">$87.7 trillion worth of CDSs</a> somewhere off the books.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/04/16/barney-frank-doesnt-get-it-stress-tests-are-just-the-tip-of-th/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Barney Frank doesn't get it: Stress tests are just the tip of the iceberg</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/04/16/barney-frank-doesnt-get-it-stress-tests-are-just-the-tip-of-th/">Barney Frank doesn't get it: Stress tests are just the tip of the iceberg</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 16 Apr 2009 09:20:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&amp;sid=atpi4NaIiZVI&amp;refer=home>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/04/16/barney-frank-doesnt-get-it-stress-tests-are-just-the-tip-of-th/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1518149/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/04/16/barney-frank-doesnt-get-it-stress-tests-are-just-the-tip-of-th/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Barney Frank</category><category>BarneyFrank</category><category>inthenews</category><category>jpm</category><category>stress tests</category><category>StressTests</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Connie Madon]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 16 Apr 2009 09:20:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Obama plans to disclose bank stress test results]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/04/15/obama-plans-to-disclose-bank-stress-test-results/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/04/15/obama-plans-to-disclose-bank-stress-test-results/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/04/15/obama-plans-to-disclose-bank-stress-test-results/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/economic-data/" rel="tag">Economic Data</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/politics/" rel="tag">Politics</a></p><p><img  alt="" hspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2009/04/mahidoodi.jpg" align="right" vspace="4" border="1" />The <em>New York Times</em> <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2009/04/15/business/economy/15bailout.html?_r=1&amp;ref=business">reports</a> that the White House will publicly disclose the results of the stress tests of the 19 biggest banks in the country.</p>
<p>The obvious reason for not disclosing the results of the stress test is the fear that it could lead to a self-fulfilling prophesy: Banks deemed to be poorly positioned for a prolonged economic downturn will experience withdrawals, fleeing employees and less access to credit, making them more likely to fail -- or at least threatening their ability to compete.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/04/15/obama-plans-to-disclose-bank-stress-test-results/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Obama plans to disclose bank stress test results</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/04/15/obama-plans-to-disclose-bank-stress-test-results/">Obama plans to disclose bank stress test results</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 15 Apr 2009 09:20:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.nytimes.com/2009/04/15/business/economy/15bailout.html?ref=business>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/04/15/obama-plans-to-disclose-bank-stress-test-results/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1517399/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/04/15/obama-plans-to-disclose-bank-stress-test-results/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Bank</category><category>Stress Tests</category><category>StressTests</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Zac Bissonnette]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 15 Apr 2009 09:20:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Shh! All 19 banks will pass 'stress tests']]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/04/10/shh-all-19-banks-will-pass-stress-tests/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/04/10/shh-all-19-banks-will-pass-stress-tests/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/04/10/shh-all-19-banks-will-pass-stress-tests/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/good-news/" rel="tag">Good news</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/marketmatters/" rel="tag">Market Matters</a></p><p><img alt="" hspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2009/04/mahidoodi.jpg" align="right" vspace="4" border="1" />First of all, let me say that Federal law prohibits the disclosure of all bank "stress tests" and bank examinations, so everything said here is pure hearsay.</p>
<p>Nevertheless, we have some good news: <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2009/04/09/business/09bank.html?ref=business">Banks are holding up well under Federal examination</a>. All 19 banks will pass their stress tests. The bad news is that they still may need additional taxpayer money. </p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/04/10/shh-all-19-banks-will-pass-stress-tests/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Shh! All 19 banks will pass 'stress tests'</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/04/10/shh-all-19-banks-will-pass-stress-tests/">Shh! All 19 banks will pass 'stress tests'</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 10 Apr 2009 12:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.nytimes.com/2009/04/09/business/09bank.html?ref=business>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/04/10/shh-all-19-banks-will-pass-stress-tests/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1513118/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/04/10/shh-all-19-banks-will-pass-stress-tests/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>banking sector</category><category>BankingSector</category><category>featured</category><category>stress tests</category><category>StressTests</category><category>tarp money</category><category>TarpMoney</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Connie Madon]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 10 Apr 2009 12:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Our largest banks are well capitalized for current conditions]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/23/our-largest-banks-are-well-capitalized-for-current-conditions/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/23/our-largest-banks-are-well-capitalized-for-current-conditions/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/23/our-largest-banks-are-well-capitalized-for-current-conditions/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/marketmatters/" rel="tag">Market Matters</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/financial-crisis/" rel="tag">Financial Crisis</a></p><p>A source speaking on the condition of anonymity said: <a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/newsOne/idUSTRE51K1YC20090222?sp=true">"the largest banks are well capitalized for current conditions."</a></p>
<p>If this is true why doesn't someone tell these bankers to "knock it off" and stop scaring everyone in order to get more free money?</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/23/our-largest-banks-are-well-capitalized-for-current-conditions/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Our largest banks are well capitalized for current conditions</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/23/our-largest-banks-are-well-capitalized-for-current-conditions/">Our largest banks are well capitalized for current conditions</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 23 Feb 2009 14:40:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.reuters.com/article/newsOne/idUSTRE51K1YC20090222?sp=true>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/23/our-largest-banks-are-well-capitalized-for-current-conditions/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1468234/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/23/our-largest-banks-are-well-capitalized-for-current-conditions/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>banking crisis</category><category>BankingCrisis</category><category>geither</category><category>stress tests</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Connie Madon]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 23 Feb 2009 14:40:00 EST</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
