<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd">
<channel>
<title>BloggingStocks</title>
<link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com</link>
<description>BloggingStocks</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Oracle Completes Sun Merger]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/02/01/oracle-completes-sun-merger/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/02/01/oracle-completes-sun-merger/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/02/01/oracle-completes-sun-merger/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/privateequity/" rel="tag">Private Equity</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2009/11/oracle-logo-200x150.jpg"  alt="" />Software giant Oracle (<a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/oracle-corporation/orcl/nas" target="_blank">ORCL</a>) finally completed its $7.4 billion acquisition of Sun Microsystems on January 26, for $9.50 per share in cash and debt deal, setting up an opportunity for the company to dominate its competition in the database software and enterprise computing systems markets.<br />
<br />
Sun has been delisted from the Nasdaq and all Sun stock holders were to have cash payouts mailed to them within a week.<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/02/01/oracle-completes-sun-merger/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Oracle Completes Sun Merger</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/02/01/oracle-completes-sun-merger/">Oracle Completes Sun Merger</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 01 Feb 2010 17:20:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/02/01/oracle-completes-sun-merger/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19340407/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/02/01/oracle-completes-sun-merger/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Cisco Systems</category><category>CiscoSystems</category><category>hewlett-packard</category><category>ibm</category><category>java</category><category>merger</category><category>oracle</category><category>software</category><category>Solaris</category><category>Sun Microsystems</category><category>SunMicrosystems</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Matthew Scott]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 01 Feb 2010 17:20:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Options Update: Career Education Volatility Elevated at 58 on OIG Report]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/21/options-update-career-education-volatility-elevated-at-58-on-oi/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/21/options-update-career-education-volatility-elevated-at-58-on-oi/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/21/options-update-career-education-volatility-elevated-at-58-on-oi/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/wag/" rel="tag">Walgreen Co (WAG)</a></p><p><strong><img align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2009/12/flywall_final_logo_mini.gif" /></strong>Career Education (<a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/career-education-corporation/ceco/nas/option-chains">CECO</a>) closed at $22.30, selling off 19% in late afternoon trading on Dec. 18 after the Office of Inspector General sent out a negative letter concerning the for-profit education group. CECO January option implied volatility is at 58, above a level of 45 from December 16. April volatility is at 55; above its 26-week average of 43 according to Track Data, suggesting traders purchasing options to hedge price movement.</p>
<p>Three stocks with IV rise on Dec. 18: Sun Microsystems (<a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/sun-microsystems-inc/java/nas/option-chains">JAVA</a>) +3%, PowerShares DB US Dollar Index Bullish Fund (<a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/powershs-db-us-dollar-index/uup/nys/option-chains">UUP</a>) +2%, <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/walgreen-co/wag/nys/option-chains">Walgreen's</a> (NYSE-<a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/walgreen-co/wag/nys/option-chains">WAG</a>) +2%, according to IVolatility.</p>
<p><em>Option Update is provided by Stock Specialist Paul Foster of theflyonthewall.com.</em></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/21/options-update-career-education-volatility-elevated-at-58-on-oi/">Options Update: Career Education Volatility Elevated at 58 on OIG Report</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 21 Dec 2009 08:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/21/options-update-career-education-volatility-elevated-at-58-on-oi/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19289082/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/21/options-update-career-education-volatility-elevated-at-58-on-oi/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Career Education</category><category>CareerEducation</category><category>option implied volatility</category><category>OptionImpliedVolatility</category><category>PowerShares DB US Dollar Index Bullish Fund</category><category>PowersharesDbUsDollarIndexBullishFund</category><category>Sun Microsystems</category><category>SunMicrosystems</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Paul Foster]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 21 Dec 2009 08:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Oracle blinks on Sun deal]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/14/oracle-blinks-on-sun-deal/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/14/oracle-blinks-on-sun-deal/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/14/oracle-blinks-on-sun-deal/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/orcl/" rel="tag">Oracle Corp (ORCL)</a></p><img border="1" hspace="4" vspace="4" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2009/11/oracle-logo-200x150.jpg" alt="" />When it comes to enterprise databases, the name Oracle (<a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/oracle-corporation/orcl/nas">ORCL</a>) is usually the first one that comes to mind. This is why it was inevitable that the company's proposed $7.4 billion purchase of Sun Microsystems (<a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/sun-microsystems-inc/java/nas">JAVA</a>) would encounter headwinds from the antitrust authorities, especially the European Union due to the fact that Sun owns the open-source database system, MySQL.<br /><br />While Oracle can often use lots of bluster, the company is also a realist. And, it certainly wants to close its deal for Sun, which has been languishing because of the uncertainty.<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/14/oracle-blinks-on-sun-deal/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Oracle blinks on Sun deal</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/14/oracle-blinks-on-sun-deal/">Oracle blinks on Sun deal</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 14 Dec 2009 18:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/14/oracle-blinks-on-sun-deal/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19280391/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/14/oracle-blinks-on-sun-deal/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>database</category><category>inthenews</category><category>MA</category><category>mysql</category><category>oracle</category><category>sun microsystems</category><category>SunMicrosystems</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tom Taulli]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 14 Dec 2009 18:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Options Update: Sun Microsystems volatility elevated on E.U. antitrust objections]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/11/options-update-sun-microsystems-volatility-elevated-on-eu-commi/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/11/options-update-sun-microsystems-volatility-elevated-on-eu-commi/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/11/options-update-sun-microsystems-volatility-elevated-on-eu-commi/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/java/" rel="tag">Sun Microsystems (JAVA)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/orcl/" rel="tag">Oracle Corp (ORCL)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/options/" rel="tag">Options</a></p><p><img alt="" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2009/11/flywall_final_logo_mini.gif" />Sun Microsystems( <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/sun-microsystems-inc/java/nas/option-chains">JAVA</a>) closed at $8.15. European antitrust authorities formally objected to Oracle's (<a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/oracle-corporation/orcl/nas/option-chains">ORCL</a>) proposed purchase of JAVA, reports the <em>Wall Street Journal</em>. The move is expected to delay the deal from closing. ORCL announced in April it was paying $9.50 in cash per share for JAVA. JAVA December option implied volatility is at 47, January is at 48, April is at 34, above its 21-week average of 21, according to Track Data, suggesting larger price movement.</p>
<p>American International Group (<a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/american-international-group-inc/aig/nys/option-chains">AIG</a>) closed at $35.50.<a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/2009/11/10/aig-may-be-able-to-repay-the-u-s-after-all-moodys-now-says/"> Moody's sees</a> AIG repaying government loans. AIG December call option implied volatility is at 77, puts are at 85; below its 26-week average of 108, according to Track Data, suggesting decreasing price movement.</p>
<p><em>Option Update is provided by Stock Specialist Paul Foster of theflyonthewall.com</em>.</p>
<p> </p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/11/options-update-sun-microsystems-volatility-elevated-on-eu-commi/">Options Update: Sun Microsystems volatility elevated on E.U. antitrust objections</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 11 Nov 2009 08:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/11/options-update-sun-microsystems-volatility-elevated-on-eu-commi/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19232324/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/11/options-update-sun-microsystems-volatility-elevated-on-eu-commi/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>American Intl</category><category>AmericanIntl</category><category>option implied volatility</category><category>OptionImpliedVolatility</category><category>Sun Microsystems</category><category>SunMicrosystems</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Paul Foster]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 08:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Closing Bell: Sudden euphoria, take 18 (C, DNDN, LOW, ORCL, SII)]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/22/closing-bell-sudden-euphoria-take-18-c-dndn-low-orcl-sii/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/22/closing-bell-sudden-euphoria-take-18-c-dndn-low-orcl-sii/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/22/closing-bell-sudden-euphoria-take-18-c-dndn-low-orcl-sii/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/c/" rel="tag">Citigroup Inc. (C)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/low/" rel="tag">Lowe's Cos (LOW)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/orcl/" rel="tag">Oracle Corp (ORCL)</a></p><img hspace="4" border="1" align="right" vspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/08/bell-green.jpg" alt="" />Today started out strong with a weaker dollar ahead of tomorrow's FOMC meeting. We have a slew of data coming out the rest of the week and tomorrow's commentary on securities purchases and liquidity programs should likely beat out the notion that rates are still staying at near-zero percent. <br /><br />Here are today's unofficial closing bell levels:<br /><br />Dow 	9,829.27 	+50.41 	(0.52%) <br />S&amp;P 500 	1,071.63 	+6.97 	(0.65%) <br />Nasdaq 	2,146.30 	+8.26 	(0.39%)<br /><br /><a href="http://247wallst.com/2009/09/22/top-analyst-upgrades-bcsi-cvd-trak-dndn-dish-gymb-hpq-m-btu-petm-x/">Top Analyst Upgrades</a><br /><a href="http://247wallst.com/2009/09/22/top-analyst-downgrades-dell-mlm-nvtl-swir-unt-vmc/">Top Analyst Downgrades</a><br /><a href="http://247wallst.com/2009/09/22/top-day-trader-alerts-aob-dptr-etfc-c-fnm-fre-aig/">Top Trader Alert Stocks</a><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/22/closing-bell-sudden-euphoria-take-18-c-dndn-low-orcl-sii/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Closing Bell: Sudden euphoria, take 18 (C, DNDN, LOW, ORCL, SII)</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/22/closing-bell-sudden-euphoria-take-18-c-dndn-low-orcl-sii/">Closing Bell: Sudden euphoria, take 18 (C, DNDN, LOW, ORCL, SII)</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 22 Sep 2009 16:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/22/closing-bell-sudden-euphoria-take-18-c-dndn-low-orcl-sii/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19170178/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/22/closing-bell-sudden-euphoria-take-18-c-dndn-low-orcl-sii/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>DNDN</category><category>home improvement</category><category>HomeImprovement</category><category>leerink swann</category><category>LeerinkSwann</category><category>lowes</category><category>oil services</category><category>OilServices</category><category>SII</category><category>singapore sovereign wealth fund</category><category>SingaporeSovereignWealthFund</category><category>sun microsystems</category><category>SunMicrosystems</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jon Ogg]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 22 Sep 2009 16:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Oracle's Ellison: We may make netbooks soon]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/06/04/oracles-ellison-we-may-make-netbooks-soon/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/06/04/oracles-ellison-we-may-make-netbooks-soon/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/06/04/oracles-ellison-we-may-make-netbooks-soon/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/products-and-services/" rel="tag">Products and Services</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/competitive-strategy/" rel="tag">Competitive Strategy</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/orcl/" rel="tag">Oracle Corp (ORCL)</a></p><img hspace="4" border="0" align="right" vspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2009/06/orcl.jpg" alt="" /><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/oracle-corporation/orcl/nas">Oracle Corp.</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/oracle-corporation/orcl/nas">ORCL</a>) said something interesting this week: It may join the ranks of PC makers and offer a netbook PC for sale. Why on earth Oracle would want to get into the extremely popular but low-margin netbook PC hardware business is an interesting mystery, but that's exactly what Oracle chief Larry Ellison indicated.<br /><br />Oracle, which is in the midst of closing its deal to buy Sun Microsystems, said that Sun's Java technology could be used to run a future Oracle-branded netbook PC. <a href="http://www.bizjournals.com/sacramento/stories/2009/06/01/daily33.html">Ellison quipped that</a> "I don't see why some of those devices shouldn't come from Sun . . . there will be computers that are fundamentally based on Java."<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/06/04/oracles-ellison-we-may-make-netbooks-soon/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Oracle's Ellison: We may make netbooks soon</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/06/04/oracles-ellison-we-may-make-netbooks-soon/">Oracle's Ellison: We may make netbooks soon</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 04 Jun 2009 08:20:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.bizjournals.com/sacramento/stories/2009/06/01/daily33.html>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/06/04/oracles-ellison-we-may-make-netbooks-soon/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19056070/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/06/04/oracles-ellison-we-may-make-netbooks-soon/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>inthenews</category><category>Larry Ellison</category><category>LarryEllison</category><category>Netbooks</category><category>Oracle Corp.</category><category>OracleCorp.</category><category>orcl</category><category>Sun Microsystems</category><category>SunMicrosystems</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Brian White]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 04 Jun 2009 08:20:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Options Update: Sun Microsystems May volatility up into Oracle purchase]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/04/20/options-update-sun-microsystems-may-volatility-up-into-oracle-p/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/04/20/options-update-sun-microsystems-may-volatility-up-into-oracle-p/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/04/20/options-update-sun-microsystems-may-volatility-up-into-oracle-p/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/deals/" rel="tag">Deals</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/java/" rel="tag">Sun Microsystems (JAVA)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/orcl/" rel="tag">Oracle Corp (ORCL)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/options/" rel="tag">Options</a></p><p><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/sun-microsystems-inc/java/nas/option-chains"><img align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2009/04/flywall_final_logo_mini.gif" /><strong>Sun Microsystems</strong></a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/sun-microsystems-inc/java/nas/option-chains">JAVA</a>) will be acquired by <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/oracle-corporation/orcl/nas/option-chains">Oracle </a>(NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/oracle-corporation/orcl/nas/option-chains">ORCL</a>) for $9.50. JAVA May call option implied volatility of 118 was above its 26-week average of 89, according to Track Data, suggesting larger price movement.</p>
<p>ORCL is recently down 80 cents to $18.20 in pre-open trading. ORCL April option implied volatility of 49 is near its 26-week average of 52, according to Track Data, suggesting non-directional movement.<br /></p>
<p><em>Option Update is provided by Stock Specialist Paul Foster of theflyonthewall.com</em></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/04/20/options-update-sun-microsystems-may-volatility-up-into-oracle-p/">Options Update: Sun Microsystems May volatility up into Oracle purchase</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 20 Apr 2009 08:08:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/04/20/options-update-sun-microsystems-may-volatility-up-into-oracle-p/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1522065/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/04/20/options-update-sun-microsystems-may-volatility-up-into-oracle-p/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>inthenews</category><category>java</category><category>option implied volatility</category><category>OptionImpliedVolatility</category><category>orcl</category><category>Sun Microsystems</category><category>SunMicrosystems</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Paul Foster]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 20 Apr 2009 08:08:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[IBM takes the nuclear option on the Sun deal]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/04/06/ibm-takes-the-nuclear-option-on-the-sun-deal/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/04/06/ibm-takes-the-nuclear-option-on-the-sun-deal/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/04/06/ibm-takes-the-nuclear-option-on-the-sun-deal/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/csco/" rel="tag">Cisco Systems (CSCO)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/ibm/" rel="tag">International Business Machines (IBM)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/java/" rel="tag">Sun Microsystems (JAVA)</a></p><p><img alt="" hspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2009/04/sun.jpg" align="right" vspace="4" border="1" />It seemed like a done deal. But in the high-stakes M&amp;A game, things can easily fall to pieces.<br /><br />Just look at <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/international-business-machines-corporation/ibm/nys">IBM</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/international-business-machines-corporation/ibm/nys">IBM</a>). Over the weekend, the firm <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2009/04/06/technology/business-computing/06blue.html?hp">withdrew</a> its $7 billion bid for <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/sun-microsystems-inc/java/nas">Sun Microsystems</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/sun-microsystems-inc/java/nas">JAVA</a>). It's yet another heart-breaker for beleaguered Sun shareholders. </p>
<p>Actually, according to the <a href="http://www.wsj.com">Wall Street Journal</a> [a paid publication], it looks like IBM was the only company interested in a deal. So, even though Sun had little negotiating leverage, it acted as though it had a lot - that is, by holding out for a higher valuation and firmer deal protections (such as "change of control" clauses that provided Sun execs with lush payouts). Well, I guess IBM didn't need Sun that badly or if anything, was certainly willing to play hardball.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/04/06/ibm-takes-the-nuclear-option-on-the-sun-deal/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>IBM takes the nuclear option on the Sun deal</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/04/06/ibm-takes-the-nuclear-option-on-the-sun-deal/">IBM takes the nuclear option on the Sun deal</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 06 Apr 2009 11:10:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/04/06/ibm-takes-the-nuclear-option-on-the-sun-deal/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1508571/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/04/06/ibm-takes-the-nuclear-option-on-the-sun-deal/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>CSCO</category><category>IBM</category><category>inthenews</category><category>JAVA</category><category>Servers</category><category>Software</category><category>Sun Microsystems</category><category>SunMicrosystems</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tom Taulli]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 06 Apr 2009 11:10:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Microsoft's Ballmer slams IBM's potential purchase of Sun Microsystems]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/20/microsofts-ballmer-slams-ibms-potential-purchase-of-sun-micros/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/20/microsofts-ballmer-slams-ibms-potential-purchase-of-sun-micros/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/20/microsofts-ballmer-slams-ibms-potential-purchase-of-sun-micros/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/msft/" rel="tag">Microsoft (MSFT)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/ibm/" rel="tag">International Business Machines (IBM)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/java/" rel="tag">Sun Microsystems (JAVA)</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2009/03/sun.jpg" />If <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/international-business-machines-corporation/ibm/nys">IBM Corp.</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/international-business-machines-corporation/ibm/nys">IBM</a>) really does go ahead and buy <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/sun-microsystems-inc/java/nas">Sun Microsystems</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/sun-microsystems-inc/java/nas">JAVA</a>) for a cool $6.5 billion or more, the two former adversaries could be joined into a powerful computing combination. One of its -- no, its largest competitor would be: <a href="http:// http://finance.aol.com/quotes/microsoft-corporation/msft/nas">Microsoft Corp.</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http:// http://finance.aol.com/quotes/microsoft-corporation/msft/nas">MSFT</a>). With many powerful players challenging Microsoft's dominance these days (Google in the consumer space), here's another one. That is, if the merger speculation turns out to be true.<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/20/microsofts-ballmer-slams-ibms-potential-purchase-of-sun-micros/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Microsoft's Ballmer slams IBM's potential purchase of Sun Microsystems</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/20/microsofts-ballmer-slams-ibms-potential-purchase-of-sun-micros/">Microsoft's Ballmer slams IBM's potential purchase of Sun Microsystems</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 20 Mar 2009 14:20:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.businessinsider.com/ballmer-sun-micro-nothing-but-a-sandbag-for-ibm-2009-3>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/20/microsofts-ballmer-slams-ibms-potential-purchase-of-sun-micros/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1493379/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/20/microsofts-ballmer-slams-ibms-potential-purchase-of-sun-micros/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>IBM Corp.</category><category>IbmCorp.</category><category>inthenews</category><category>Microsoft Corp.</category><category>MicrosoftCorp.</category><category>MSFT</category><category>Steve Ballmer</category><category>SteveBallmer</category><category>Sun Microsystems</category><category>SunMicrosystems</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Brian White]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 20 Mar 2009 14:20:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Hewlett-Packard to face more pressure if IBM buys Sun Microsystems]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/19/hewlett-packard-to-face-more-pressure-if-ibm-buys-sun-microsyste/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/19/hewlett-packard-to-face-more-pressure-if-ibm-buys-sun-microsyste/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/19/hewlett-packard-to-face-more-pressure-if-ibm-buys-sun-microsyste/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/hpq/" rel="tag">Hewlett-Packard (HPQ)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/ibm/" rel="tag">International Business Machines (IBM)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/java/" rel="tag">Sun Microsystems (JAVA)</a></p><p><img alt="" hspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2009/03/hp.jpg" align="right" vspace="4" border="0" /><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/hewlett-packard-company/hpq/nys">Hewlett-Packard, Inc.</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/hewlett-packard-company/hpq/nys">HPQ</a>) has been on a roll lately. The company has basically battered <a href="http://%20http://finance.aol.com/quotes/dell-inc/dell/nas">Dell, Inc.</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://%20http://finance.aol.com/quotes/dell-inc/dell/nas">DELL</a>) in the last two years as it increased its PC marketshare in the consumer and retail arena. </p>
<p>Now it has set its sights on <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/international-business-machines-corporation/ibm/nys">IBM Corp.</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/international-business-machines-corporation/ibm/nys">IBM</a>), as it tries to become the largest computer service and consulting company in the world. It's already the largest by sales, topping $100 billion annually.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/19/hewlett-packard-to-face-more-pressure-if-ibm-buys-sun-microsyste/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Hewlett-Packard to face more pressure if IBM buys Sun Microsystems</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/19/hewlett-packard-to-face-more-pressure-if-ibm-buys-sun-microsyste/">Hewlett-Packard to face more pressure if IBM buys Sun Microsystems</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 19 Mar 2009 13:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://money.cnn.com/news/newsfeeds/articles/djf500/200903182105DOWJONESDJONLINE001029_FORTUNE5.htm>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/19/hewlett-packard-to-face-more-pressure-if-ibm-buys-sun-microsyste/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1492486/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/19/hewlett-packard-to-face-more-pressure-if-ibm-buys-sun-microsyste/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Hewlett-Packard</category><category>HP servers</category><category>HPQ</category><category>HpServers</category><category>IBM buys Sun</category><category>IBM Corp.</category><category>IbmBuysSun</category><category>IbmCorp.</category><category>inthenews</category><category>Sun microsystems</category><category>SunMicrosystems</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Brian White]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 19 Mar 2009 13:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Closing Bell: Fed becomes buyer of, well, everything (JAVA, IBM, GE, AIG, ADBE, FAS)]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/18/closing-bell-fed-becomes-buyer-of-well-everything-java-ibm/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/18/closing-bell-fed-becomes-buyer-of-well-everything-java-ibm/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/18/closing-bell-fed-becomes-buyer-of-well-everything-java-ibm/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/ge/" rel="tag">General Electric (GE)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/ibm/" rel="tag">International Business Machines (IBM)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/adbe/" rel="tag">Adobe Systems (ADBE)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/aig/" rel="tag">Amer Intl Group (AIG)</a></p><img hspace="4" border="1" align="right" vspace="4" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/08/bell-green.jpg" />Today was a massive day, and not just for the stock market. The FOMC might as well just be turning on the printing presses for all the capital it is going to inject to banks with <span style="text-decoration: underline;">its</span><a href="http://247wallst.com/2009/03/18/fomc-massively-gooses-govt-balance-sheet/"> $1 Trillion (plus)</a> purchase of securities. The massive rally right after the FOMC announcement came well off of highs, but the excitement is there. The tame CPI is of no impact here in that sense. <br /><br />Here are today's unofficial closing bell levels: <br /><br />Dow 	7,486.58 	+90.88 (1.23%) <br />S&amp;P 500 	794.35 	+16.23 (2.09%) <br />Nasdaq 	1,491.22 	+29.11 (1.99%)<br /><br /><a href="http://247wallst.com/2009/03/18/top-analyst-upgrades-aap-azo-ed-crh-dhr-lly-intc-leap-orly-seic/http://247wallst.com/2009/03/18/top-analyst-upgrades-aap-azo-ed-crh-dhr-lly-intc-leap-orly-seic/">Top Analyst Upgrades</a><br /><a href="http://247wallst.com/2009/03/18/top-analyst-downgrades-aeg-asti-avr-nu-rds-a/">Top Analyst Downgrades</a><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/18/closing-bell-fed-becomes-buyer-of-well-everything-java-ibm/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Closing Bell: Fed becomes buyer of, well, everything (JAVA, IBM, GE, AIG, ADBE, FAS)</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/18/closing-bell-fed-becomes-buyer-of-well-everything-java-ibm/">Closing Bell: Fed becomes buyer of, well, everything (JAVA, IBM, GE, AIG, ADBE, FAS)</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 18 Mar 2009 16:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/18/closing-bell-fed-becomes-buyer-of-well-everything-java-ibm/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1491979/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/18/closing-bell-fed-becomes-buyer-of-well-everything-java-ibm/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>AIG</category><category>cpi</category><category>direxion</category><category>FOMC</category><category>sun microsystems</category><category>SunMicrosystems</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jon Ogg]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 18 Mar 2009 16:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[A black Friday for 16,000 workers as Citi and Sun plan massive layoffs]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/14/a-black-friday-for-16-000-workers-as-citi-and-sun-plan-massive-l/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/14/a-black-friday-for-16-000-workers-as-citi-and-sun-plan-massive-l/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/14/a-black-friday-for-16-000-workers-as-citi-and-sun-plan-massive-l/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/forecasts/" rel="tag">Forecasts</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/c/" rel="tag">Citigroup Inc. (C)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/java/" rel="tag">Sun Microsystems (JAVA)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/economic-data/" rel="tag">Economic Data</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/financial-crisis/" rel="tag">Financial Crisis</a></p><p>On Thursday, government statistics announced that <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/13/jobless-claims-at-highest-level-since-1983/">516,000</a> Americans filed for unemployment in the first week of November. Today, 16,000 more workers from two companies joined what is likely to be a daily list that strikes fear into the hearts of people across the country. And why not? After eight years of declining inflation-adjusted wages, their reward for hanging on is a heightened risk of losing those jobs altogether and competing with more people for fewer jobs in a receding economy.</p>
<p>The two companies announcing big layoffs: a big bank and a leading tech company that sells to banks. According to reports, <strong><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/citigroup-incorporated/c/nys">Citigroup</a></strong> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/citigroup-incorporated/c/nys">C</a>) may lay off <a href="http://money.cnn.com/2008/11/14/news/companies/citigroup_layoffs/index.htm">10,000</a> employees -- adding to the 23,000 it has already cut in the last year. <strong><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/sun-microsystems-inc/java/nas">Sun Microsystems</a></strong> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/sun-microsystems-inc/java/nas">JAVA</a>) announced it will can <a href="http://money.cnn.com/2008/11/14/news/companies/sun_microsystems/index.htm">6,000</a> people -- 18% of its work force --- citing the need to "align its cost model with the global economic climate."</p>
<p>Is this the bottom? I seriously doubt it. The unemployment rate could get up to 8.5%, and maybe as high as its post-Depression high of 10.7%, up from its current 6.5%. At least that's what Nobel Prize winning economist and <em>New York Times</em> op-editorialist <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2008/11/14/opinion/14krugman.html">Paul Krugman</a> expects. Needless to say, in an economy which depends on consumers for 70% of its growth, this is not good news since it divides the country into two categories -- those who lose their jobs and those who fear losing them.</p>
<p>And both groups are likely to spend less.</p>
<p><em>Peter Cohan is President of</em> <a href="http://petercohan.com/"><em><font color="#0072bc">Peter S. Cohan &amp; Associates</font></em></a><em>. He also </em><a href="http://www3.babson.edu/Academics/Divisions/management/facultyprofile.cfm?pageid=391236"><em><font color="#0072bc">teaches management at Babson College</font></em></a>.<em> His eighth book, <a href="http://www.amazon.com/You-Cant-Order-Change-Turnaround/dp/1591842395/ref=sr_1_2/002-0707230-7400838?ie=UTF8&amp;s=books&amp;qid=1220097046&amp;sr=1-2"><font color="#888888">You Can't Order Change: Lessons From Jim McNerney's Turnaround at Boeing</font></a>, will be published by Portfolio on December 26, 2008</em><em>. He owns Citi shares and has no financial interest in Sun securities.</em></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/14/a-black-friday-for-16-000-workers-as-citi-and-sun-plan-massive-l/">A black Friday for 16,000 workers as Citi and Sun plan massive layoffs</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 14 Nov 2008 09:45:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://money.cnn.com/2008/11/14/news/companies/citigroup_layoffs/index.htm>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/14/a-black-friday-for-16-000-workers-as-citi-and-sun-plan-massive-l/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1372132/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/14/a-black-friday-for-16-000-workers-as-citi-and-sun-plan-massive-l/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>c</category><category>citigroup</category><category>economy</category><category>inthenews</category><category>java</category><category>sun microsystems</category><category>SunMicrosystems</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Peter Cohan]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 14 Nov 2008 09:45:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Can a white-knight bid rescue Sun Microsystems?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/10/23/can-a-white-knight-bid-rescue-sun-microsystems/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/10/23/can-a-white-knight-bid-rescue-sun-microsystems/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/10/23/can-a-white-knight-bid-rescue-sun-microsystems/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/analyst-reports/" rel="tag">Analyst Reports</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/java/" rel="tag">Sun Microsystems (JAVA)</a></p><p>Earlier this week, my colleague Douglas McIntyre observed that <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/sun-microsystems-inc/java/nas">Sun Microsystems</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/sun-microsystems-inc/java/nas">JAVA</a>) "<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/10/21/sun-microsystems-demonstrates-why-it-should-be-sold/">is one of the worst performing large-tech companies in America</a>." It seems that ratings firm Fitch agrees with his take as last night it slashed JAVA's ratings outlook from "stable" to "negative." As a result of the move, JAVA is trading just pennies away from its annual low of $4.51 this morning.</p>
<p>In a release, Fitch cited a litany of challenges facing Sun Micro, including deteriorating demand outlook, recent share losses in the server market, significant decline in gross margin, and the expectation for continued pressure on information technology spending into 2009.</p>
<p>Even more troubling, investors learned today that Sun's co-founder, Andreas von Bechtolsheim, is <a href="http://www.bizjournals.com/sanjose/stories/2008/10/20/daily67.html?ana=from_rss">stepping down</a> from his role as chief architect to work for start-up firm Arista Networks.</p>
<p>However, as bleak as things may seem for Sun, another report adds an interesting angle to McIntyre's suggestion that JAVA should be sold to the highest bidder. Southeastern Asset Management, a value investment firm, said Wednesday that it's <a href="http://www.computerworld.com/action/article.do?command=viewArticleBasic&amp;articleId=9117838&amp;source=rss_topic18">boosted its stake</a> in Sun Microsystems to 21%. The firm said that it plans to hold discussions with Sun's management "regarding opportunities to maximize the value of the company for all shareholders." And we all know what that's code for, right? Stay tuned to see how this potential M&amp;A deal unfolds.</p>
<p><em>Elizabeth Harrow is an analyst and financial writer in the research department at <a href="http://www.schaeffersresearch.com/">Schaeffer's Investment Research</a>. </em></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/10/23/can-a-white-knight-bid-rescue-sun-microsystems/">Can a white-knight bid rescue Sun Microsystems?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 23 Oct 2008 12:30:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.computerworld.com/action/article.do?command=viewArticleBasic&amp;articleId=9117838&amp;source=rss_topic18>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/10/23/can-a-white-knight-bid-rescue-sun-microsystems/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1350744/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/10/23/can-a-white-knight-bid-rescue-sun-microsystems/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>arista networks</category><category>AristaNetworks</category><category>Fitch</category><category>inthenews</category><category>JAVA</category><category>southeastern asset management</category><category>SoutheasternAssetManagement</category><category>sun microsystems</category><category>SunMicrosystems</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Elizabeth Harrow]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 23 Oct 2008 12:30:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Not all tech created equal (GOOG, IBM, TXN, JAVA)]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/10/21/not-all-tech-created-equal-goog-ibm-txn-java/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/10/21/not-all-tech-created-equal-goog-ibm-txn-java/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/10/21/not-all-tech-created-equal-goog-ibm-txn-java/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/goog/" rel="tag">Google (GOOG)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/ibm/" rel="tag">International Business Machines (IBM)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/java/" rel="tag">Sun Microsystems (JAVA)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/txn/" rel="tag">Texas Instruments (TXN)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/technology/" rel="tag">Technology</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/nasdaq/" rel="tag">NASDAQ</a></p><p><em><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/10/todd_harrison.jpg" />Minyanville contributor Adam Katz dares to share the kind of keen insight and actionable information you won't find in any prospectus. For more original thought, visit </em><a href="http://www.minyanville.com/"><font color="#888888"><em>www.minyanville.com</em></font></a><em>.</em></p>
<p><strong><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/texas-instruments-incorporated/txn/nys">Texas Instruments</a></strong> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/texas-instruments-incorporated/txn/nys">TXN</a>) reported disappointing results and <strong>Sun Microsystems </strong>(NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/sun-microsystems-inc/java/nas">JAVA</a>) preannounced negatively. Last week, <strong>IBM </strong>(NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/international-business-machines-corporation/ibm/nys">IBM</a>) followed through with their positive preannouncement and <strong>Google </strong>(NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/google-inc/goog/nas">GOOG</a>) outperformed expectations.</p>
<p>What we are seeing is a divergence in where dollars are flowing. With company web sites largely representing the most effective and quantifiable marketing tool, it should come as no surprise that GOOG has revenue streams that are reasonably insulated. (This is not a call on GOOG because I believe the market is also pricing in the fact that the hyper growth days are behind them).</p>
<p>With respect to IBM, infrastructure software has been the primary driver behind the top line growth and growth in margins. In the meantime, the disappointment that we are seeing from TXN and JAVA should be reasonably expected as you are seeing slowing demand for hardware (in part driven by virtualization which by definition lowers hardware requirements) and TXN which, leveraged to consumer communication devices, is also taking a pause.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/10/21/not-all-tech-created-equal-goog-ibm-txn-java/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Not all tech created equal (GOOG, IBM, TXN, JAVA)</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/10/21/not-all-tech-created-equal-goog-ibm-txn-java/">Not all tech created equal (GOOG, IBM, TXN, JAVA)</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 21 Oct 2008 13:40:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.minyanville.com/>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/10/21/not-all-tech-created-equal-goog-ibm-txn-java/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1348573/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/10/21/not-all-tech-created-equal-goog-ibm-txn-java/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>goog</category><category>google</category><category>ibm</category><category>java</category><category>sun microsystems</category><category>SunMicrosystems</category><category>texas instruments</category><category>TexasInstruments</category><category>txn</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Todd Harrison]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 21 Oct 2008 13:40:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Sun Microsystems demonstrates why it should be sold]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/10/21/sun-microsystems-demonstrates-why-it-should-be-sold/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/10/21/sun-microsystems-demonstrates-why-it-should-be-sold/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/10/21/sun-microsystems-demonstrates-why-it-should-be-sold/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/earnings-reports/" rel="tag">Earnings Reports</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/industry/" rel="tag">Industry</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/ibm/" rel="tag">International Business Machines (IBM)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/java/" rel="tag">Sun Microsystems (JAVA)</a></p><p><a href="http://biz.yahoo.com/ap/081020/sun_microsystems_outlook.html?.v=4">Sun Microsystems</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://biz.yahoo.com/ap/081020/sun_microsystems_outlook.html?.v=4">JAVA</a>) showed, once again, that it is one of the worst performing large-tech companies in America. The firm said <a href="http://www.forbes.com/feeds/ap/2008/10/20/ap5580813.html">its loss</a> will be between 25 cents and 35 cents per share for the three months ended Sept. 28. Excluding one-time charges, the drop is between 2 cents and 12 cents per share. To make matters worse, it will probably take goodwill impairment charges for companies it has bought over the last two years. In other words, Sun paid too much.</p>
<p>Sun's revenue is also expected to be light, at about $3 billion. </p>
<p>It is old news to say that Sun has not come up with a single product compelling enough to get it out of the mud. Its servers are no better than those marketed by <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/international-business-machines-corporation/ibm/nys">IBM</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/international-business-machines-corporation/ibm/nys">IBM</a>) or other large hardware companies. Corporate customers tend to go with the supplier that has the largest service force and best balance sheet.</p>
<p>The announcement does raise the question of why Sun is not being sold by its board. The stock trades at just above $5, down from a 52-week high of $24.08. So far this year, it is off nearly 70% while IBM is down only 12%. </p>
<p>Sun has a clean balance sheet with plenty of cash and modest debt. It would fit well with a number of larger companies that would like a larger part of the global server market.</p>
<p>Let the auction begin.</p>
<p><em>Douglas A. McIntyre is an editor at 247walls.com. </em></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/10/21/sun-microsystems-demonstrates-why-it-should-be-sold/">Sun Microsystems demonstrates why it should be sold</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 21 Oct 2008 08:35:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.forbes.com/feeds/ap/2008/10/20/ap5580813.html>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/10/21/sun-microsystems-demonstrates-why-it-should-be-sold/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1348161/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/10/21/sun-microsystems-demonstrates-why-it-should-be-sold/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>IBM</category><category>inthenews</category><category>JAVA</category><category>sun</category><category>sun microsystems</category><category>SunMicrosystems</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Douglas McIntyre]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 21 Oct 2008 08:35:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Sun Microsystems (JAVA) drops on forecast of losses]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/08/01/sun-microsystems-java-drops-on-forecast-of-losses/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/08/01/sun-microsystems-java-drops-on-forecast-of-losses/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/08/01/sun-microsystems-java-drops-on-forecast-of-losses/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/major-movement/" rel="tag">Major Movement</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/earnings-reports/" rel="tag">Earnings Reports</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/forecasts/" rel="tag">Forecasts</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/bad-news/" rel="tag">Bad News</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/java/" rel="tag">Sun Microsystems (JAVA)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/options/" rel="tag">Options</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/analysis/" rel="tag">Technical Analysis</a></p><a target="_blank" href="http://www.sun.com/aboutsun/investor/index.jsp"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="right" alt="JAVA logo" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/07/sunwlogo.jpg" /></a><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/sun-microsystems-inc/java/nas">Sun Microsystems</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/sun-microsystems-inc/java/nas">JAVA</a>) shares are falling today after <a href="http://money.aol.com/news/articles/qp/ap/_a/sun-s-gloomy-1q-outlook-hurts-shares/rfid127013187?channel=%22pf%22">the company warned it will likely not turn a profit in the current quarter</a>, despite having <a href="http://today.reuters.com/news/articlehybrid.aspx?type=comktNews&amp;rpc=33&amp;storyid=2008-08-01T114746Z_01_WNAB4368_RTRIDST_0_BUSINESS-SUN-DC.XML">earnings come in at the high end of estimates this morning and announcing a stock buyback</a>. JAVA executives said a weak financial sector has led to lower sales for the company. If you think this stock won't be rising too far in the coming months, then it could be a good time to look at a bearish hedged play on JAVA(see more pf today's <a href="http://money.aol.com/news/earnings">earnings news</a>).<br /><br />After hitting a one-year high of $25.04 in October, the stock hit a one-year low of $8.63 in July. This morning, JAVA opened at $9.84. So far today the stock has hit a low of $9.10 and a high of $10.02. As of 12:10, JAVA is trading at $9.31, down 1.32 (-12.4%). The chart for JAVA looks bearish and improving slightly, while <a href="http://www.iotogo.com/spoutlookonline" target="_blank">S&amp;P</a> gives the stock a bearish 2 STARS (out of 5) sell rating.<br /><br />For a bearish hedged play on this stock, I would consider an October <a href="http://www.iotogo.com/HSCS" target="_blank">bear-call credit spread</a> above the $11 range. A bear-call credit spread is an options position that combines the purchase and sale of call options to hedge risk in case the stock doesn't do what you think but still leverage nice returns. For this particular trade, we will make an 11.1% return in eleven weeks as long as JAVA is below $11 at October expiration. Sun Micro would have to rise by more than 18.5% before we would start to lose money. Learn more about this type of trade <a href="http://www.iotogo.com/HSCS" target="_blank">here</a>.<br /><br />JAVA hasn't been above $11 since late June and has shown resistance around $10.15 recently. This trade could be risky if the overall market starts to rally, but even if that happens, this position could be protected by resistance JAVA might find at its 50 day moving average, which is currently around $11 and falling.<br /><em><br />Brent Archer is an options analyst and writer at <a href="http://www.iotogo.com/aolblogba" target="_blank">Investors Observer</a>. <br /><br />DISCLOSURE: Mr. Archer owns and/or controls diversified portfolios of long and short stock and option positions that may include holdings in companies he writes about. At publication time, Brent neither owns nor controls positions in JAVA.</em><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/08/01/sun-microsystems-java-drops-on-forecast-of-losses/">Sun Microsystems (JAVA) drops on forecast of losses</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 01 Aug 2008 13:39:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/08/01/sun-microsystems-java-drops-on-forecast-of-losses/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1273023/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/08/01/sun-microsystems-java-drops-on-forecast-of-losses/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>earnings</category><category>featured</category><category>forecast</category><category>investors observer</category><category>InvestorsObserver</category><category>JAVA</category><category>options</category><category>sun microsystems</category><category>SunMicrosystems</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Brent Archer]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 01 Aug 2008 13:39:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Sun Microsystems' preliminary results pleased investors, but I'm not buying]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/07/16/sun-microsystems-preliminary-results-pleased-investors-but-im/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/07/16/sun-microsystems-preliminary-results-pleased-investors-but-im/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/07/16/sun-microsystems-preliminary-results-pleased-investors-but-im/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/earnings-reports/" rel="tag">Earnings Reports</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/msft/" rel="tag">Microsoft (MSFT)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/hpq/" rel="tag">Hewlett-Packard (HPQ)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/java/" rel="tag">Sun Microsystems (JAVA)</a></p><p><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/sun-microsystems-inc/java/nas">Sun Microsystems</a>' (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/sun-microsystems-inc/java/nas">JAVA</a>) preliminary <a href="http://money.aol.com/news/articles/qp/pr/_a/sun-microsystems-reports-preliminary/rfid121877393">numbers</a> for the fourth quarter sparked an after-sessions rally on Tuesday. The tech entity said it should see somewhere between $3.7 billion and $3.8 billion for the top line. Earnings per diluted share will come in between $0.25 and $0.35 on a non-GAAP basis. Gross margin should be at least 44%. </p>
<p>Wall Street was apparently happy that Sun didn't expect an earnings bomb, according to this <a href="http://today.reuters.com/news/articlehybrid.aspx?type=comktNews&amp;storyID=2008-07-16T004353Z_01_N15373637_RTRIDST_0_BUSINESS-SUNMICRO-FORECAST-DC.XML&amp;pageNumber=0&amp;imageid=&amp;cap=&amp;sz=13&amp;WTModLoc=HybArt-C1-ArticlePage2">Reuters</a> article. Understandable, considering the current state of the economy. It looks like Sun has an okay chance of meeting or beating earnings expectations. Reuters says that analysts are looking for 10 cents per share on a GAAP basis. Management is looking to do somewhere between 5 cents and 15 cents per share. It's too bad the range wasn't more narrow, but I guess the theme here is that if business is at least this good, then the shares are a buy.</p>
<p>As for me, I'm not sure I see the merit of the euphoria. Sure, things could have been worse, but that doesn't mean I want to buy Sun here. The stock has done horribly this year, losing 50% of its value year-to-date (at least before the rally). I think investors should be very careful about chasing values during these bearish times. It's hard to say how bad the recession will be, and how it will affect the tech names. Companies such as <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/hewlett-packard-company/hpq/nys">Hewlett-Packard</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/hewlett-packard-company/hpq/nys">HPQ</a>) and <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/microsoft-corporation/msft/nas">Microsoft</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/microsoft-corporation/msft/nas">MSFT</a>) have seen their stocks pressured by sellers. If the shares of those blue chips are having problems, I can't see why I'd want to chase Sun Microsystems. </p>
<p><em>Disclosure: I don't own any company mentioned; positions can change at any time. </em></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/07/16/sun-microsystems-preliminary-results-pleased-investors-but-im/">Sun Microsystems' preliminary results pleased investors, but I'm not buying</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 16 Jul 2008 09:20:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://money.aol.com/news/articles/qp/pr/_a/sun-microsystems-reports-preliminary/rfid121877393>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/07/16/sun-microsystems-preliminary-results-pleased-investors-but-im/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1257253/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/07/16/sun-microsystems-preliminary-results-pleased-investors-but-im/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>hewlett-packard</category><category>hpq</category><category>inthenews</category><category>JAVA</category><category>Microsoft</category><category>MSFT</category><category>Sun Microsystems</category><category>SunMicrosystems</category><category>technology</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Steven Mallas]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 16 Jul 2008 09:20:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Answers I Really Wanna Know: Apple's Handheld Computer]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/10/answers-i-really-wanna-know-apples-handheld-computer/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/10/answers-i-really-wanna-know-apples-handheld-computer/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/10/answers-i-really-wanna-know-apples-handheld-computer/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/aapl/" rel="tag">Apple Inc (AAPL)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/gci/" rel="tag">Gannett Co (GCI)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/java/" rel="tag">Sun Microsystems (JAVA)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/leh/" rel="tag">Lehman Br Holdings (LEH)</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/06/todd_harrison.jpg" /><em><font size="2" face="Arial" color="#000000">Minyanville's top dog, Todd Harrison, dares to ask in public what Wall Street types quietly consider in private. For more insight and ideas, visit </font></em><a title="http://www.minyanville.com/" contenteditable="false" href="http://www.minyanville.com/" unselectable="on"><em><font size="2" face="Arial">www.Minyanville.com</font></em></a><em><font size="2" face="Arial" color="#000000">.</font></em><br /><br />
<ul>
    <li>If the next generation <strong>Apple </strong>(AAPL) iPhone is effectively a handheld computer, is the personal computer space a place to poke on the short side?</li>
</ul>
<ul>
    <li>What's the franchise value for <strong>Sun Microsystems</strong> (SUNW, er, JAVA)?<br /><br /></li>
    <li>Maybe that's the problem. In this ADD, immediate gratification world, perhaps folks don't remember that JAVA used to be SUNW?<br /><br /></li>
    <div class="Ih2E3d">
    <li>Woah. <a href="http://youtube.com/watch?v=bRgtofyvUIA" target="_blank"><em>Nelly</em></a><em>?</em><br /><br /></li>
    <li><a href="http://image.minyanville.com/assets/FCK_Aug2007/File/Pics19/sg2008061050043.gif" target="_blank">Given that funky looking <strong>Gold Fields </strong>(GFI) chart</a>, should I stress that I'm playing name through defined risk calls?<br /> <br /></li>
    </div>
    <li>In addition to the note that when I unwind my short crude I'm goning to sneak out of my long metal play, too?<br /><br /></li>
    <li>While I <a href="http://www.minyanville.com/articles/lehman-LEH-ms-economy-market-risk/index/a/17505" target="_blank">grabbed some tertiary financial exposure this morning</a>, why is "Good traders know how to make money while great traders know how to take a loss" repeating in my keppe as I watch the action and overhang in <strong>Lehman </strong>(LEH)?<br /> <br /></li>
    <li>Speaking of ticker symbols with G's in the front and I's behind, when do I revisit <strong>Gannett</strong> (GCI), which I pared nicely above $30 and kept some for the thesis?<br /><br /></li>
    <div class="Ih2E3d">
    <li>Speaking of pairs, <a href="http://youtube.com/watch?v=k_GxXRbSFDg" target="_blank">how do I get long Jo, short Blair</a>?<br /><br /><br />R.P.<br /><br />Positions in LEH, GFI, GCI</li>
    </div>
</ul><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/10/answers-i-really-wanna-know-apples-handheld-computer/">Answers I Really Wanna Know: Apple's Handheld Computer</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 10 Jun 2008 14:39:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/10/answers-i-really-wanna-know-apples-handheld-computer/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1221432/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/10/answers-i-really-wanna-know-apples-handheld-computer/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>aapl</category><category>apple</category><category>crude</category><category>crude oil</category><category>CrudeOil</category><category>gfi</category><category>gold fields</category><category>GoldFields</category><category>iphone</category><category>iphone 3g</category><category>iphone3g</category><category>java</category><category>leh</category><category>lehman brothers</category><category>LehmanBrothers</category><category>sunmicrosystems</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Todd Harrison]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 10 Jun 2008 14:39:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[HP steals key Sun Microsystems sales exec]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/04/hp-steals-key-sun-microsystems-sales-exec/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/04/hp-steals-key-sun-microsystems-sales-exec/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/04/hp-steals-key-sun-microsystems-sales-exec/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/management/" rel="tag">Management</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/hpq/" rel="tag">Hewlett-Packard (HPQ)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/java/" rel="tag">Sun Microsystems (JAVA)</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/06/sun.jpg" /><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/hewlett-packard-company/hpq/nys">Hewlett-Packard Co.</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/hewlett-packard-company/hpq/nys">HPQ</a>) has just <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/idg/IDG_852573C4006938800025745D0052D6AE.html?ref=technology">stolen a key global sales head</a> from competitor <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/sun-microsystems-inc/java/nas">Sun Microsystems Inc.</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/sun-microsystems-inc/java/nas">JAVA</a>). Don Grantham has joined HP as chief sales officer after resigning recently from Sun. Sun CEO Jonathan Schwartz indicated that Grantham went to HP to help that company secure a Sun Solaris license before HP's acquisition of <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/electronic-data-systems-corp-new-united-states/eds/nys">EDS Corp.</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/electronic-data-systems-corp-new-united-states/eds/nys">EDS</a>) was completed. Schwartz was seen grinding his teeth shortly thereafter as well.<br /><br />Sun, which continues to sell its servers and software quite well, but is also not growing like many of its competitors (mainly HP) is undergoing a shakeup in its DNA. The company is forming a new "Emerging Markets" sales territory to take advantage of the huge growth occurring in China, India and related countries. It's 2008 though -- this is something that should have happened a few years ago. Even <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/dell-inc/dell/nas">Dell Inc.</a>'s (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/dell-inc/dell/nas">DELL</a>) efforts last year to eke out more sales from that region <a href="http://www.theregister.co.uk/2008/05/29/dell_earnings_q1_2009/">have proved successful recently</a>. Sun is just now figuring this out?<br /><br />Meanwhile, Sun saw a loss in its most recent quarter, but did see growth in those regions where it is now forming a sales territory to concentrate on that area. Grantham will have ultimate responsibility for this, and if his lieutenants can implement Sun's free software model (running on Sun's servers with Sun's support) in India and China, then Sun may have some bright quarters soon. HP and Dell won't be sitting idly by though, both companies are already heavily invested in the region. Sun will have some catching up to do.<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/04/hp-steals-key-sun-microsystems-sales-exec/">HP steals key Sun Microsystems sales exec</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 04 Jun 2008 15:57:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.nytimes.com/idg/IDG_852573C4006938800025745D0052D6AE.html?ref=technology>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/04/hp-steals-key-sun-microsystems-sales-exec/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1214701/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/04/hp-steals-key-sun-microsystems-sales-exec/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Don Grantham</category><category>DonGrantham</category><category>Hewlett-Packard</category><category>HPQ</category><category>JAVA</category><category>Peter Ryan</category><category>PeterRyan</category><category>Sun Microsystems</category><category>SunMicrosystems</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Brian White]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 04 Jun 2008 15:57:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Trade idea on Sun Microsystems (JAVA) downgrade]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/05/23/trade-idea-on-sun-microsystems-java-downgrade/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/05/23/trade-idea-on-sun-microsystems-java-downgrade/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/05/23/trade-idea-on-sun-microsystems-java-downgrade/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/major-movement/" rel="tag">Major Movement</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/analyst-upgrades-and-downgrades/" rel="tag">Analyst Upgrades and Downgrades</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/bad-news/" rel="tag">Bad News</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/java/" rel="tag">Sun Microsystems (JAVA)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/options/" rel="tag">Options</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/analysis/" rel="tag">Technical Analysis</a></p><a href="http://www.sun.com/aboutsun/investor/index.jsp" target="_blank"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/07/sunwlogo.jpg" alt="JAVA logo" /></a><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/sun-microsystems-inc/java/nas">Sun Microsystems</a> (NASDAQ: JAVA) shares are falling after <a href="http://www.streetinsider.com/Downgrades/Morgan+Stanley+Downgrades+Sun+Microsystems+%28JAVA%29+to+Underweight/3683394.html" target="_blank">a Morgan Stanley analyst downgraded the stock to "Underweight" from "Equal-weight."</a> The broker believes the company is at risk as demand shifts downstream and pricing pressure intensifies. If you think this stock won't be rising too far in the coming months, then it could be a good time to look at a bearish hedged play on JAVA.<br /><br />After hitting a one-year high of $25.04 in November, the stock has fallen and is trading near its year low today. This morning, JAVA opened at $12.63. So far today the stock has hit a low of $12.50 and a high of $12.85. As of 12:20, JAVA is trading at $12.66, down 48 cents(-3.6%). The chart for JAVA looks bearish and steady while <a href="http://www.iotogo.com/spoutlookonline" target="_blank">S&amp;P</a> gives the stock a positive 4 STARS (out of 5) buy rating.<br /><br />For a bearish hedged play on this stock, I would consider an October <a href="http://www.iotogo.com/HSCS" target="_blank">bear-call credit spread</a> above the $15 range. A bear-call credit spread is an options position that combines the purchase and sale of call options to hedge risk in case the stock doesn't do what you think but still leverage nice returns. For this particular trade, we will make a 15.6% return in five months as long as JAVA is below $15 at October expiration. Sun would have to rise by more than 15% before we would start to lose money. Learn more about this type of trade <a href="http://www.iotogo.com/HSCS" target="_blank">here</a>.<br /><br />JAVA hasn't been above $15 since it fell sharply in early May and has shown resistance around $12.50 recently. This trade could be risky if the company's earnings (due out in late July) are a positive surprise, but even if that happens, this position could be protected by resistance JAVA might find at its 50 day moving average, which is currently around $15 and falling.<br /><br /><em>Brent Archer is an options analyst and writer at <a href="http://www.iotogo.com/aolblogba" target="_blank">Investors Observer</a>. <br /><br />DISCLOSURE: Mr. Archer owns and/or controls diversified portfolios of long and short stock and option positions that may include holdings in companies he writes about. At publication time, Brent neither owns nor controls positions in JAVA.</em><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/05/23/trade-idea-on-sun-microsystems-java-downgrade/">Trade idea on Sun Microsystems (JAVA) downgrade</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 23 May 2008 13:12:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/05/23/trade-idea-on-sun-microsystems-java-downgrade/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1204407/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/05/23/trade-idea-on-sun-microsystems-java-downgrade/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>downgrade</category><category>Investors Observer</category><category>InvestorsObserver</category><category>JAVA</category><category>options</category><category>sun microsystems</category><category>SunMicrosystems</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Brent Archer]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 23 May 2008 13:12:00 EST</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
