<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd">
<channel>
<title>BloggingStocks</title>
<link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com</link>
<description>BloggingStocks</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Which Super Bowl Ad Won the Night?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/02/08/which-super-bowl-ad-won-the-night/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/02/08/which-super-bowl-ad-won-the-night/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/02/08/which-super-bowl-ad-won-the-night/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/columns/" rel="tag">Columns</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/business-of-sports/" rel="tag">Business of Sports</a></p><p><img hspace="4" vspace="4" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2010/02/superbowl-logo.jpg" alt="" />So, on Friday I took a look at <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/02/05/jockstocks-super-bowl-commercials-a-preview/">the potential of some Super Bowl advertisements</a>, which leaves today to digest the commercials and say who we thought had the best commercial.</p>
<p>First things first, congratulations New Orleans -- what a win. Second of all, I need to make an editorial comment before I reveal my thoughts on the best commercial: what's up with all the guys in their underwear? I saw enough tighty whities in the span of two minutes during the first half to last the rest of my life. I know one thing, I am not going to go to CareerBuilder.com or wear Dockers thanks to the visage of pasty white men in their underwear standing at the water cooler or singing about pants.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/02/08/which-super-bowl-ad-won-the-night/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Which Super Bowl Ad Won the Night?</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/02/08/which-super-bowl-ad-won-the-night/">Which Super Bowl Ad Won the Night?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 08 Feb 2010 12:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/02/08/which-super-bowl-ad-won-the-night/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19348828/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/02/08/which-super-bowl-ad-won-the-night/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>commercials</category><category>Dexter</category><category>Dodge</category><category>featured</category><category>Super Bowl</category><category>Super Bowl Ads</category><category>Super Bowl commercials</category><category>SuperBowl</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark Fightmaster]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 08 Feb 2010 12:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[JockStocks: Super Bowl Commercials, a Preview]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/02/05/jockstocks-super-bowl-commercials-a-preview/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/02/05/jockstocks-super-bowl-commercials-a-preview/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/02/05/jockstocks-super-bowl-commercials-a-preview/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/consumer-experience/" rel="tag">Consumer Experience</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/pep/" rel="tag">PepsiCo (PEP)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/gm/" rel="tag">General Motors (GM)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/marketing-and-advertising/" rel="tag">Marketing and Advertising</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/cbs/" rel="tag">CBS Corp 'B' (CBS)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/business-of-sports/" rel="tag">Business of Sports</a></p><p><img hspace="4" vspace="4" border="1" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2010/02/superbowl-logo.jpg" />Who's ready for some football? The Super Bowl is this weekend, and you know what that means -- commercials that we will all be talking about on Monday morning. In fact, we all know someone who says they watch the game for the commercials.</p>
<p>CBS announced earlier this week that it <a href="http://www.adweek.com/aw/content_display/inc/quickread/e3i5b66cf410765355130f4355ab772b5b7?KeepThis=true&amp;TB_iframe=true&amp;height=310&amp;width=600" target="_blank">sold out all the in-game spots</a>, but a few pre- and post-game spots remained. How much money did this make for CBS (<a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/cbs-corporation/cbs/nys">CBS</a>)? Roughly $200 million, and that is a low-end estimate. We all know why advertisers flock to the Super Bowl, as more than 98.7 million viewers tuned in last year. No matter who is in the Super Bowl, people watch the game and the commercials -- and eventually they may buy the products from the ads.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/02/05/jockstocks-super-bowl-commercials-a-preview/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>JockStocks: Super Bowl Commercials, a Preview</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/02/05/jockstocks-super-bowl-commercials-a-preview/">JockStocks: Super Bowl Commercials, a Preview</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 05 Feb 2010 12:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/02/05/jockstocks-super-bowl-commercials-a-preview/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19346280/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/02/05/jockstocks-super-bowl-commercials-a-preview/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Anheuser-Busch</category><category>BUD</category><category>Budweiser</category><category>CBS</category><category>Doritos</category><category>DPS</category><category>Dr Pepper</category><category>featured</category><category>General Motors</category><category>GM</category><category>GoDaddy.com</category><category>inthenews</category><category>PEP</category><category>Pepsico</category><category>super bowl</category><category>super bowl ads</category><category>super bowl advertising</category><category>Tim Tebow</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark Fightmaster]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 05 Feb 2010 12:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[PespiCo Makes an Interesting Marketing Decision]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/01/01/pespico-makes-an-interesting-marketing-decision/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/01/01/pespico-makes-an-interesting-marketing-decision/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/01/01/pespico-makes-an-interesting-marketing-decision/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/ko/" rel="tag">Coca-Cola (KO)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/pep/" rel="tag">PepsiCo (PEP)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/marketing-and-advertising/" rel="tag">Marketing and Advertising</a></p><p><img border="1" hspace="4" alt="" vspace="4" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2010/01/pepsico-logo-240.jpg" />I was surprised to read that PepsiCo, Inc. (<a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/pepsico-inc/pep/nys">PEP</a>) isn't going to utilize the Super Bowl for advertising purposes. According to this item over at <a href="http://industry.bnet.com/food/10001201/pepsi-will-do-fine-without-super-bowl-and-vice-versa/">BNET.com</a>, the soda giant will not air commercials for its beverages during the popular annual event.</p>
<p>It's interesting because both PepsiCo and Coca-Cola (<a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/the-coca-cola-company/ko/nys">KO</a>) thrive on one thing: effective marketing. Sure, you might be a fan of soft drinks and think they sell themselves, but they really don't. Every year, each company's management team must make important decisions concerning how much to spend on ads, whether or not a particular campaign is working, which celebrity should be approached next to become a sponsor, etc. </p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/01/01/pespico-makes-an-interesting-marketing-decision/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>PespiCo Makes an Interesting Marketing Decision</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/01/01/pespico-makes-an-interesting-marketing-decision/">PespiCo Makes an Interesting Marketing Decision</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 01 Jan 2010 19:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://industry.bnet.com/food/10001201/pepsi-will-do-fine-without-super-bowl-and-vice-versa/>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/01/01/pespico-makes-an-interesting-marketing-decision/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19300059/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/01/01/pespico-makes-an-interesting-marketing-decision/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>coca-cola</category><category>featured</category><category>KO</category><category>PEP</category><category>pepsico</category><category>super bowl</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Steven Mallas]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 01 Jan 2010 19:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[GoDaddy shows others what not to do with Super Bowl ads]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/02/godaddy-shows-others-what-not-to-do-with-super-bowl-ads/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/02/godaddy-shows-others-what-not-to-do-with-super-bowl-ads/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/02/godaddy-shows-others-what-not-to-do-with-super-bowl-ads/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/television/" rel="tag">Television</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/rants-and-raves/" rel="tag">Rants and Raves</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/scandals/" rel="tag">Scandals</a></p><img hspace="4" border="0" align="right" vspace="4" alt=""  src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2009/02/godaddy.jpg" />I didn't watch much of the Super Bowl, but my husband called me in to watch the GoDaddy ads; I have several domains registered through the company, and they were ... memorable. It was of little surprise that, as soon as I reacted in horror to the courtroom advertisement in which a woman, with obvious breast enhancements, shows the court a little too much of her cleavage, I started <a href="http://search.twitter.com/search?q=godaddy">seeing the "tweets" from dozens of the people</a> I follow on Twitter. Those who weren't already divested of GoDaddy claimed outrage, and began to wonder if they should pull their domains.<br /><br />This morning, I watched in amazement as "<a href="http://search.twitter.com/search?q=nodaddy">#nodaddy</a>" became a trending topic on Twitter. Not only were both men and women in equal numbers angry about the misogynistic ad, but people were actually changing their domain registrar; a difficult process that can take hours of waiting on hold. A <a href="http://spreadsheets.google.com/pub?key=p3O079avNqMbOeQaSMmiODQ">list of GoDaddy</a> <a href="http://glenniacampbell.typepad.com/silenti/2009/02/godaddysucks.html#more">alternatives</a> was making the rounds; no one at all was suggesting they'd buy a domain from the company because of salacious excitement.<br /><br />Naturally, the Twitter audience is likely already familiar with the company, so the simple name recognition play the company continues to chase wouldn't work with the million-strong "niche." But perhaps this niche is also the sort which registers domain names in enough quantities to affect the company's sales; in my opinion, it was an attention-getter that went so far over the edge, sales are now hurtling toward a chasm. (Here is a <a href="http://uptime.netcraft.com/netmove/today">chart of gains and losses in top domain companies</a>; tomorrow's figures will be telling, but for now, losses nearly equal gains, whereas they are usually about half.) Whether or not GoDaddy survives the firestorm of negative opinion, one thing is certain: we now know where the line is. Also, women both watch football, and register domain names, and future ad companies might do well to remember this.<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/02/godaddy-shows-others-what-not-to-do-with-super-bowl-ads/">GoDaddy shows others what not to do with Super Bowl ads</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 02 Feb 2009 19:38:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/02/godaddy-shows-others-what-not-to-do-with-super-bowl-ads/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1448020/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/02/godaddy-shows-others-what-not-to-do-with-super-bowl-ads/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>godaddy</category><category>nodaddy</category><category>super bowl</category><category>super bowl ads</category><category>SuperBowl</category><category>SuperBowlAds</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Sarah Gilbert]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 02 Feb 2009 19:38:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Bank of America sponsors the NFL Experience ... a bad move?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/02/bank-of-america-sponsors-the-nfl-experience-a-bad-move/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/02/bank-of-america-sponsors-the-nfl-experience-a-bad-move/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/02/bank-of-america-sponsors-the-nfl-experience-a-bad-move/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/bac/" rel="tag">Bank of America (BAC)</a></p><img hspace="4" align="right" vspace="4" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/02/bac-bank-of-america-logo.jpg" />We may need to have a talk with <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/bank-of-america-corporation/bac/nys" target="_blank">Bank of America</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/bank-of-america-corporation/bac/nys" target="_blank">BAC</a>) ... a talk about tact and smart spending. Remember last week? You know, when President Obama lowered the hammer of shame on banks that were wasting their money? Perhaps BAC doesn't. <br /><br />I was going to avoid writing about the Super Bowl today (mainly because I am a Cincinnati Bengals fan that hates the Steelers), but I found a story questioning the thought process of BAC and its sponsorship of the NFL Experience. This traveling exhibit has been a mainstay at the past 18 Super Bowls and it features sports games and interactive entertainment stretched over 850,000 square feet.<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/02/bank-of-america-sponsors-the-nfl-experience-a-bad-move/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Bank of America sponsors the NFL Experience ... a bad move?</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/02/bank-of-america-sponsors-the-nfl-experience-a-bad-move/">Bank of America sponsors the NFL Experience ... a bad move?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 02 Feb 2009 19:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/02/bank-of-america-sponsors-the-nfl-experience-a-bad-move/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1447953/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/02/bank-of-america-sponsors-the-nfl-experience-a-bad-move/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>bac</category><category>Bank of America</category><category>BankOfAmerica</category><category>corporate governance</category><category>CorporateGovernance</category><category>dumb</category><category>inthenews</category><category>spending</category><category>Super Bowl</category><category>SuperBowl</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark Fightmaster]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 02 Feb 2009 19:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[How 'super' was the Super Bowl for GE? (Updated)]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/02/how-super-was-the-super-bowl-for-ge/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/02/how-super-was-the-super-bowl-for-ge/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/02/how-super-was-the-super-bowl-for-ge/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/competitive-strategy/" rel="tag">Competitive Strategy</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/ge/" rel="tag">General Electric (GE)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/marketing-and-advertising/" rel="tag">Marketing and Advertising</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/business-of-sports/" rel="tag">Business of Sports</a></p><img hspace="4" border="1" align="right" vspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2009/02/nbculogo.jpg" alt="" />Was yesterday's Super Bowl "super" for <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/general-electric-company/ge/nys">General Electric Co.</a> (NYSE:<a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/general-electric-company/ge/nys"> GE</a>)? While it is no doubt prestigious to broadcast the NFL championship, I wonder whether it's as great as it seems for the company's bottom line.<br /><br />GE's NBC network trumpeted in a press release that it earned <a href="http://nbcumv.com/release_detail.nbc/sports-20090131000000-nbcsellsoutsuper.html">$206 million</a> in advertising revenue from 32 different advertisers. It <a href="http://money.aol.com/news/articles/_a/bbdp/nbc-scores-record-206-million-in-super/325077">sold the last two of the spots</a> the night before the game. I am skeptical about this figure for several reasons.<br /><br /> Any numbers publicized in connection with advertising should be taken with a grain of salt. Gross billings, which often gets publicized, is a bogus number because it includes stuff that agencies charge their clients such as postage. The revenue figures publicized by NBC can be fudged in many ways. Remember, this is advertising.<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/02/how-super-was-the-super-bowl-for-ge/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>How 'super' was the Super Bowl for GE? (Updated)</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/02/how-super-was-the-super-bowl-for-ge/">How 'super' was the Super Bowl for GE? (Updated)</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 02 Feb 2009 13:24:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://nbcumv.com/release_detail.nbc/sports-20090131000000-nbcsellsoutsuper.html>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/02/how-super-was-the-super-bowl-for-ge/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1447721/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/02/how-super-was-the-super-bowl-for-ge/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Advertising</category><category>Enterainment</category><category>Featured</category><category>GE</category><category>Media</category><category>NBC</category><category>NFC</category><category>Super Bowl</category><category>SuperBowl</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jonathan Berr]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 02 Feb 2009 13:24:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Five winning Super Bowl trades: V. Short Expedia (EXPE)]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/01/five-winning-super-bowl-trades-v-short-expedia-expe/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/01/five-winning-super-bowl-trades-v-short-expedia-expe/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/01/five-winning-super-bowl-trades-v-short-expedia-expe/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/expe/" rel="tag">Expedia Inc (EXPE)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/stocks-to-sell/" rel="tag">Stocks to Sell</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/recession/" rel="tag">Recession</a></p><p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2009/01/rv.jpg" alt="" />Since most of the Pittsburgh and Arizona fans who are going to the game will drive -- <a href="http://www.optionszone.com/trading-ideas/gallery/super-bowl-trades-part7.html">Pittsburgh fans</a> in their SUVs, <a href="http://www.optionszone.com/trading-ideas/gallery/super-bowl-trades-part5.html">Arizona fans</a> in their RVs, avoiding tolls the whole way -- take a look at shorting travel sites. </p>
<p>Think about it. </p>
<p>My guess is that when you need to travel, you probably go to a travel site, find the flight, and then book it on the airline's sites because it's easier and cheaper to change your flight than it is with an online travel service. </p>
<p>Furthermore, not that many people are flying.</p>
<p>Take a look at shorting <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/expedia-inc-del/expe/nas">Expedia</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/expedia-inc-del/expe/nas">EXPE</a>). It's a great site -- I use it all the time. But if you want to make money on the stock, <a href="http://www.optionszone.com/learn-more/michael-shulman/what-to-know-when-making-a-short-trade.html">short it</a>. </p>
<p><a href="http://www.optionszone.com/expert-traders/optionszone-experts/michael-shulman.html"><em>Michael Shulman</em></a><em> is a contributor to <a href="http://www.optionszone.com/trading-ideas/gallery/obama-seven-trades.html">OptionsZone.com</a>.</em></p>
<p> </p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/01/five-winning-super-bowl-trades-v-short-expedia-expe/">Five winning Super Bowl trades: V. Short Expedia (EXPE)</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Sun, 01 Feb 2009 13:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/01/five-winning-super-bowl-trades-v-short-expedia-expe/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1445867/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/01/five-winning-super-bowl-trades-v-short-expedia-expe/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>online travel site</category><category>OnlineTravelSite</category><category>super bowl</category><category>super bowl trades</category><category>SuperBowl</category><category>SuperBowlTrades</category><category>travel sites</category><category>TravelSites</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Michael Shulman]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 01 Feb 2009 13:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Five winning Super Bowl trades: IV. Buy Denny's Corp. (DENN)]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/01/five-winning-super-bowl-trades-iv-buy-dennys-corp-denn/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/01/five-winning-super-bowl-trades-iv-buy-dennys-corp-denn/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/01/five-winning-super-bowl-trades-iv-buy-dennys-corp-denn/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/bargain-stocks/" rel="tag">Bargain Stocks</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/stocks-to-buy/" rel="tag">Stocks to Buy</a></p><p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2009/01/pancakes.gif" />When shares of <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/denny-s-corporation/denn/nas">Denny's Corp.</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/denny-s-corporation/denn/nas">DENN</a>) are trading at half the price of a Grand Slam Breakfast, yet it was one of <a href="http://www.optionszone.com/trading-ideas/gallery/super-bowl-trades-part6.html">the companies</a> willing to drop big bucks on a Super Bowl ad, I gotta jump in my car and get down to Denny's to see what's gone wrong. </p>
<p>Problem is, nothing has gone wrong. They are just as crowded as ever, <a href="http://www.optionszone.com/trading-ideas/2009/01/its-no-picnic-for-restaurants.html">especially during this</a> recession. </p>
<p>They represent a full sit-down meal destination at fast-food prices. And the portions are big. </p>
<p>The company has totally restructured, selling off franchises and keeping all the best locations for its own portfolio -- and the results are pouring in. </p>
<p>On Jan. 15, the company said it expects to meet or exceed its previous guidance for full-year 2008, thanks to the success of the Franchise Growth Initiative (FGI) and other cost-saving actions that protect margins and cash flow. </p>
<p>With the stock trading around $1.50 per share, it's time to consider whether Denny's is some low-hanging fruit ready for the picking.</p>
<p><em><a href="http://www.optionszone.com/expert-traders/optionszone-experts/bryan-perry.html">Bryan Perry</a> is a contributor to <a href="http://www.optionszone.com/gallery/other-galleries-to-read.html">OptionsZone.com</a></em>.</p>
<p><br /></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/01/five-winning-super-bowl-trades-iv-buy-dennys-corp-denn/">Five winning Super Bowl trades: IV. Buy Denny's Corp. (DENN)</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Sun, 01 Feb 2009 09:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/01/five-winning-super-bowl-trades-iv-buy-dennys-corp-denn/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1445938/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/01/five-winning-super-bowl-trades-iv-buy-dennys-corp-denn/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>denn</category><category>Dennys</category><category>dennys corp</category><category>DennysCorp</category><category>restaurant chains</category><category>restaurant stocks</category><category>RestaurantChains</category><category>restaurants</category><category>RestaurantStocks</category><category>super bowl</category><category>super bowl trades</category><category>SuperBowl</category><category>SuperBowlTrades</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Bryan Perry]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 01 Feb 2009 09:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[GE (GE): NBC pays its way with Super Bowl sales record]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/01/ge-ge-nbc-pays-its-way-with-super-bowl-sales-record/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/01/ge-ge-nbc-pays-its-way-with-super-bowl-sales-record/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/01/ge-ge-nbc-pays-its-way-with-super-bowl-sales-record/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/television/" rel="tag">Television</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/ge/" rel="tag">General Electric (GE)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/marketing-and-advertising/" rel="tag">Marketing and Advertising</a></p><p><img hspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/12/nbculogo.jpg" align="right" vspace="4" border="1" alt="" />NBCU, the entertainment division of <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/general-electric-company/ge/nys">General Electric</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/general-electric-company/ge/nys">GE</a>), is one of the units that Wall Street wants the conglomerate to dump. Maybe shareholders would be better off if it hangs around.</p>
<p>Some analysts thought GE would sell NBCU after it had gotten a big profit from its rights to the Olympics in Beijing. TV advertising is being hurt by the economy. But, the network has delivered again with record sales for the Super Bowl. <a href="http://money.aol.com/news/articles/qp/ap/_a/nbc-sells-out-super-bowl-ads-for-record/rfid180860221">According to</a> the AP, "NBC said on the eve of Sunday's Super Bowl that it has sold the last two of the 67 advertising spots for the game, pushing total ad revenue for the event to a record $206 million."</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/01/ge-ge-nbc-pays-its-way-with-super-bowl-sales-record/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>GE (GE): NBC pays its way with Super Bowl sales record</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/01/ge-ge-nbc-pays-its-way-with-super-bowl-sales-record/">GE (GE): NBC pays its way with Super Bowl sales record</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Sun, 01 Feb 2009 06:18:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/01/ge-ge-nbc-pays-its-way-with-super-bowl-sales-record/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1446798/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/01/ge-ge-nbc-pays-its-way-with-super-bowl-sales-record/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>GE</category><category>General Electric</category><category>inthenews</category><category>NBC</category><category>NBCU</category><category>Super Bowl</category><category>SuperBowl</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Douglas McIntyre]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 01 Feb 2009 06:18:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Five winning Super Bowl trades: III. Buy Grupo Televisa SA (TV)]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/31/hold-5-winning-super-bowl-trades-iii-buy-grupo-televisa-sa/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/31/hold-5-winning-super-bowl-trades-iii-buy-grupo-televisa-sa/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/31/hold-5-winning-super-bowl-trades-iii-buy-grupo-televisa-sa/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/stocks-to-buy/" rel="tag">Stocks to Buy</a></p><p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2009/01/soccer.gif" />One billion people will be watching the Super Bowl, but 5.7 billion others couldn't care less. In the United States, we love football -- the rest of the world, loves futbol (soccer). </p>
<p><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/grupo-televisa-sa-de-cv/tv/nys">Grupo Televisa SA</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/grupo-televisa-sa-de-cv/tv/nys">TV</a>) produces television channels that reach subscribers in 60 countries throughout Latin America, the United States (via Univision), Canada, Europe and Asia Pacific.</p>
<p>This company won't be blinded by the Super Bowl hype. </p>
<p>Last year, TV yanked NFL games, including the Super Bowl, off the air in Mexico for the whole season after a 35-year run because they felt they were overpaying for the broadcast rights. The NFL felt the Latin heat and entered into new deal terms for the season that began in September 2008.</p>
<p>TV has shown steady revenue and earnings growth during the past several years and is expected to keep growing through 2010. With its advantageous market position and growth characteristics, it is trading at a P/E of about 12. </p>
<p>Ay, caramba!</p>
<p><em><a href="http://www.optionszone.com/expert-traders/optionszone-experts/nick-atkeson-andrew-houghton.html">Nick Atkeson and Andrew Houghton</a> are contributors to <a href="http://www.optionszone.com/learn-more/andrew-houghton-nick-atkeson/gallery/nine-winning-trades.html">OptionsZone.com</a>.</em> </p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/31/hold-5-winning-super-bowl-trades-iii-buy-grupo-televisa-sa/">Five winning Super Bowl trades: III. Buy Grupo Televisa SA (TV)</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Sat, 31 Jan 2009 16:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/31/hold-5-winning-super-bowl-trades-iii-buy-grupo-televisa-sa/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1445686/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/31/hold-5-winning-super-bowl-trades-iii-buy-grupo-televisa-sa/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>football</category><category>futbol</category><category>grupo televisa</category><category>Grupo Televisa SA</category><category>GrupoTelevisa</category><category>GrupoTelevisaSa</category><category>soccer</category><category>super bowl</category><category>super bowl trades</category><category>SuperBowl</category><category>SuperBowlTrades</category><category>univision</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Andrew Houghton &amp; Nick Atkeson]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 31 Jan 2009 16:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Five winning Super Bowl trades: II. Short MGM Mirage (MGM)]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/31/five-winning-super-bowl-trades-ii-short-mgm-mirage-mgm/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/31/five-winning-super-bowl-trades-ii-short-mgm-mirage-mgm/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/31/five-winning-super-bowl-trades-ii-short-mgm-mirage-mgm/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/stocks-to-sell/" rel="tag">Stocks to Sell</a></p><p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2009/01/vegas.gif" />In an economy like this, is anyone going to the game? </p>
<p>Yes -- but Pittsburgh people will stay in their cars (hotels are too expensive), and the Arizona people will stay in foreclosed houses (so they should feel right at home). </p>
<p>Speaking of hotels -- short 'em. </p>
<p>I received an e-mail from the Mirage in Las Vegas to come out to watch the Super Bowl for $69 a night. </p>
<p>Last time I was there for the Super Bowl, maybe 15 years ago, it was about $400 a night.</p>
<p>The Mirage is owned by <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/mgm-mirage/mgm/nys">MGM Mirage</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/mgm-mirage/mgm/nys">MGM</a>), which is hovering at a technical support price. Once it breaks through, look out. </p>
<p>I'm not traveling to Tampa or Las Vegas -- I'm <a href="http://www.optionszone.com/trading-ideas/gallery/super-bowl-trades-part2.html">staying at home</a> for the big game. And I'm <a href="http://www.optionszone.com/learn-more/michael-shulman/what-is-a-short-stock-or-option-position.html">shorting</a> MGM.</p>
<p><em><a href="http://www.optionszone.com/expert-traders/optionszone-experts/michael-shulman.html">Michael Shulman</a> is a contributor to <a href="http://www.optionszone.com/trading-ideas/gallery/stock-market-nightmare.html">OptionsZone.com</a>.</em><br /></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/31/five-winning-super-bowl-trades-ii-short-mgm-mirage-mgm/">Five winning Super Bowl trades: II. Short MGM Mirage (MGM)</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Sat, 31 Jan 2009 13:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/31/five-winning-super-bowl-trades-ii-short-mgm-mirage-mgm/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1445845/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/31/five-winning-super-bowl-trades-ii-short-mgm-mirage-mgm/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>hotel stocks</category><category>hotels</category><category>HotelStocks</category><category>las vegas</category><category>las vegas mirage</category><category>LasVegas</category><category>LasVegasMirage</category><category>mgm</category><category>mgm mirage</category><category>MgmMirage</category><category>mirage</category><category>super bowl</category><category>super bowl trades</category><category>SuperBowl</category><category>SuperBowlTrades</category><category>vegas</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Michael Shulman]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 31 Jan 2009 13:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Five winning Super Bowl trades: I. Buy U.S. Steel (X)]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/31/five-winning-super-bowl-trades-i-buy-u-s-steel-x/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/31/five-winning-super-bowl-trades-i-buy-u-s-steel-x/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/31/five-winning-super-bowl-trades-i-buy-u-s-steel-x/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/x/" rel="tag">U.S. Steel (X)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/stocks-to-buy/" rel="tag">Stocks to Buy</a></p><p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2009/01/pittsburg.gif" />You can't talk about the Steelers and the stock market without thinking about <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/united-states-steel-corporation/x/nys">U.S. Steel</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/united-states-steel-corporation/x/nys">X</a>). </p>
<p>The company's headquarters pierces the Pittsburgh skyline like the Steelers' defense pierces opposing offensive lines.</p>
<p>The U.S. steel industry has been dramatically affected by the global economic slowdown, as demand for autos, buildings and other steel-based products has declined rapidly. </p>
<p>As a result, X is now trading at $30 after hitting a high of almost $200 in June 2008. That's an 85% decline in seven months.</p>
<p>But X has been trying to root out a bottom around $25 for the past three months, and the long-term potential for X is becoming more positive. </p>
<p>And, for what it's worth, X gained 25% in the three months following the Steelers' last Super Bowl victory.</p>
<p><em><a href="http://www.optionszone.com/expert-traders/optionszone-experts/chris-johnson.html">Chris Johnson</a> is a contributor to <a href="http://www.optionszone.com/trading-ideas/gallery/12-keys-to-trading-earnings.html">OptionsZone.com</a>.</em> <br /></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/31/five-winning-super-bowl-trades-i-buy-u-s-steel-x/">Five winning Super Bowl trades: I. Buy U.S. Steel (X)</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Sat, 31 Jan 2009 10:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/31/five-winning-super-bowl-trades-i-buy-u-s-steel-x/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1445803/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/31/five-winning-super-bowl-trades-i-buy-u-s-steel-x/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>steel</category><category>steelers</category><category>super bowl</category><category>super bowl trades</category><category>SuperBowl</category><category>SuperBowlTrades</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Chris Johnson]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 31 Jan 2009 10:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Five winning Super Bowl trades]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/30/five-winning-super-bowl-trades/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/30/five-winning-super-bowl-trades/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/30/five-winning-super-bowl-trades/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/expe/" rel="tag">Expedia Inc (EXPE)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/x/" rel="tag">U.S. Steel (X)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/stocks-to-buy/" rel="tag">Stocks to Buy</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/stocks-to-sell/" rel="tag">Stocks to Sell</a></p><p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2009/01/super-bowl.gif" />It's Super Bowl time. </p>
<p>This day of the year has almost reached holiday status where families and friends gather in front of big-screen TV to spend six hours watching a typically boring football game and stuffing themselves with nachos, wings and beer.</p>
<p>With all of the hoopla surrounding the event, this is a good time for investors to go for some Super Bowl profits.</p>
<p>Why? Looks like it's not just a pseudo-holiday -- it's a tradition:</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/30/five-winning-super-bowl-trades/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Five winning Super Bowl trades</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/30/five-winning-super-bowl-trades/">Five winning Super Bowl trades</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 30 Jan 2009 17:40:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/30/five-winning-super-bowl-trades/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1445177/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/30/five-winning-super-bowl-trades/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>dennys</category><category>dennys corp</category><category>DennysCorp</category><category>featured</category><category>grupo televisa</category><category>grupo televisa sa</category><category>GrupoTelevisa</category><category>GrupoTelevisaSa</category><category>mgm mirage</category><category>MgmMirage</category><category>super bowl</category><category>super bowl trades</category><category>SuperBowl</category><category>SuperBowlTrades</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Andrew Houghton &amp; Nick Atkeson]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 30 Jan 2009 17:40:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Super Bowl advertisers mull change in strategy]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/28/super-bowl-advertisers-mull-change-in-strategy/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/28/super-bowl-advertisers-mull-change-in-strategy/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/28/super-bowl-advertisers-mull-change-in-strategy/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/marketing-and-advertising/" rel="tag">Marketing and Advertising</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/business-of-sports/" rel="tag">Business of Sports</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2009/01/super_bowl_2009_logo.jpg" />Super Bowl ads have <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/20/go-long-super-bowl-ad-sales-strong-as-economy-weakens/">sold quickly</a> and at record prices in spite of the economy, but some advertisers are wondering whether the commercials that are already in the can strike the right tone.<br /><br />With the economy haven taken a turn for the worse, some companies are scrapping the ads they've already put together to create new ones that are more in tune with the economic hardships most Americans are facing. The New York Times <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2009/01/28/business/media/28adco.html?pagewanted=2&amp;ref=business">reports</a> that Hyundai is replacing a planned ad for the 2010 Hyundai Genesis coupe with one for a promotion that allows consumers to <a href="http://www.walletpop.com/blog/2009/01/05/hyundai-harley-lead-way-in-recession-fighting-incentives/">return their cars if they lose their jobs.</a><br /><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/28/super-bowl-advertisers-mull-change-in-strategy/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Super Bowl advertisers mull change in strategy</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/28/super-bowl-advertisers-mull-change-in-strategy/">Super Bowl advertisers mull change in strategy</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 28 Jan 2009 18:30:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.nytimes.com/2009/01/28/business/media/28adco.html?ref=business>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/28/super-bowl-advertisers-mull-change-in-strategy/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1443556/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/28/super-bowl-advertisers-mull-change-in-strategy/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Advertising</category><category>Super Bowl</category><category>SuperBowl</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Zac Bissonnette]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 28 Jan 2009 18:30:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Money winners of 2008: Eli Manning steps out of his brother's shadow]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/12/16/money-winners-of-2008-eli-manning-steps-out-of-his-brothers-sh/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/12/16/money-winners-of-2008-eli-manning-steps-out-of-his-brothers-sh/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/12/16/money-winners-of-2008-eli-manning-steps-out-of-his-brothers-sh/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/marketing-and-advertising/" rel="tag">Marketing and Advertising</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/business-of-sports/" rel="tag">Business of Sports</a></p><p><em><img alt="" hspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/12/blog-money-winners-eli-manning-200x267.jpg" align="right" vspace="4" border="1" />This post is part of our feature on <strong><a href="http://www.walletpop.com/specials/money-winners">Money Winners of 2008</a></strong>. See all 20.</em></p>
<p>Everybody likes an underdog, but especially me -- I'm a die-hard Cincinnati Bengals fan, after all. So, heading into the 2007 football season, I had quite a soft spot for New York Giants quarterback Eli Manning. His older brother, Peyton, had just led the Indianapolis Colts to a Super Bowl victory. Meanwhile, cranky New York sports fans were calling for Eli's head due to his rather spotty performance behind center. As far as Archie's boys go, it wasn't hard to pinpoint Eli as the underdog.</p>
<p>But, a funny thing happened on the way to the Super Bowl. The Giants nearly upset the undefeated New England Patriots in their last regular-season game, and then the Boys in Blue went on to score unexpected playoff victories against the Tampa Bay Buccaneers, the Dallas Cowboys, and the Green Bay Packers. Suddenly, Eli Manning was following in big brother Peyton's footsteps and preparing for a final showdown against the (still undefeated) Patriots in Super Bowl XLII.</p>
<p>Going into that fateful championship game, it's probably a safe bet to say that most of the football universe was rooting for the Giants. By this point in the season, the Patriots had embarrassed nearly every team in the NFL once or twice, and sports fans were thirsty for vengeance. As a result, the Eli Manning fan club swelled to proportions never before seen.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/12/16/money-winners-of-2008-eli-manning-steps-out-of-his-brothers-sh/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Money winners of 2008: Eli Manning steps out of his brother's shadow</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/12/16/money-winners-of-2008-eli-manning-steps-out-of-his-brothers-sh/">Money winners of 2008: Eli Manning steps out of his brother's shadow</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 16 Dec 2008 09:35:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/12/16/money-winners-of-2008-eli-manning-steps-out-of-his-brothers-sh/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1391751/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/12/16/money-winners-of-2008-eli-manning-steps-out-of-his-brothers-sh/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Eli Manning</category><category>endorsements</category><category>featured</category><category>Money Winners 2008</category><category>new york giants</category><category>super bowl</category><category>SuperBowl</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Elizabeth Harrow]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 16 Dec 2008 09:35:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Car Biz: GM abandons the Super Bowl]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/09/24/car-biz-gm-abandons-the-super-bowl/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/09/24/car-biz-gm-abandons-the-super-bowl/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/09/24/car-biz-gm-abandons-the-super-bowl/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/gm/" rel="tag">General Motors (GM)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/marketing-and-advertising/" rel="tag">Marketing and Advertising</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/columns/" rel="tag">Columns</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/recession/" rel="tag">Recession</a></p><em><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/09/car_wheel.jpg" alt="" />This is the first in a weekly series about the car business. The auto industry plays an important role in the global economy, but record-high oil prices and a global slowdown have created a crisis in the sector. This column will highlight some of the interesting stories that emerge as that crisis plays out.</em><br /><br />Sure, the economy is in the tank and the stock market is teetering on the edge of a very steep cliff. But the severity of the situation really hit home with shocking news about a beloved secular American feast day: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/general-motors-corporation/gm/nys">General Motors</a> (NYSE:<a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/general-motors-corporation/gm/nys">GM</a>)  <a href="http://news.moneycentral.msn.com/provider/providerarticle.aspx?feed=AP&amp;date=20080922&amp;id=9173642">announced</a> this week that it will not buy ad time during the 2009 Super Bowl (that's Super Bowl XLIII for all you Roman numeral lovers). <br /><br />It seems that it was just yesterday that GM was promoting the new 2007 Cadillac Escalade at Super Bowl XL. Sales of the Escalade -- perhaps the most over-the-top of the gigantic SUVs that so many Americans fell in love with -- had been falling, and GM hoped to recapture consumers' bling-addled imaginations with a shiny new model displayed, appropriately enough, on a fashion runway. It was not to be, though, as Escalade sales continued to fall. <br /><br />And who can forget GM's adorable <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/09/09/ads-gone-bad-gms-suicidal-robot/">suicide robot</a> ad from Super Bowl XLI? Some stick-in-the-muds found it a bit insensitive, but it did get people talking. It did not, however, help GM increase its sales. <br /><br />And that's the basic problem. Critics have long argued that GM relies too heavily on cheap redesigns and flashy advertising to sell cars, rather than focusing on good engineering and construction. The fact that GM is bailing out on the biggest advertising day in the media calendar suggests just how desperate it is. Maybe it has learned the lesson that you can't sell cars no one wants, no matter how much you spend on advertising. Let's hope that the money saved on Super Bowl ads is spent on making cars that can compete with <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/toyota-motor-corporation/tm/nys">Toyota</a> (NYSE:<a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/toyota-motor-corporation/tm/nys">TM</a>) and <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/honda-motor-co-adr/hmc/nys">Honda</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/honda-motor-co-adr/hmc/nys">HMC</a>).<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/09/24/car-biz-gm-abandons-the-super-bowl/">Car Biz: GM abandons the Super Bowl</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 24 Sep 2008 11:20:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/09/24/car-biz-gm-abandons-the-super-bowl/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1322435/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/09/24/car-biz-gm-abandons-the-super-bowl/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Cadillac Escalade</category><category>CadillacEscalade</category><category>GM</category><category>HMC</category><category>inthenews</category><category>Super Bowl</category><category>SuperBowl</category><category>TM</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Michael Rainey]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 24 Sep 2008 11:20:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Ads Gone Bad: GoDaddy's racy ad too hot for the Super Bowl]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/09/09/ads-gone-bad-godaddys-racy-add-too-hot-for-the-super-bowl/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/09/09/ads-gone-bad-godaddys-racy-add-too-hot-for-the-super-bowl/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/09/09/ads-gone-bad-godaddys-racy-add-too-hot-for-the-super-bowl/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/marketing-and-advertising/" rel="tag">Marketing and Advertising</a></p><p><em><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/09/ads-gone-bad-go-daddy-200cs082808.jpg" alt="" />This post is part of our <strong><a href="http://money.aol.com/special/ads-gone-bad">Ads Gone Bad</a></strong> series. Share your thoughts and memories of this ad in the comments, and be sure to check out our other posts on marketing gone wrong.</em></p>
<p>In 2005, internet registrar GoDaddy.com made <a href="http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/6930045/">advertising history</a> when its commercial showing a busty model struggling to keep her top on as she "testifies" before a group of politicians about the company's advertising plans proved too hot for the Super Bowl.</p>
<p>The spot was so racy and tasteless that Fox pulled it from its telecast of the game between the New England Patriots and Philadelphia Eagles before it was shown a second time. How the network that brought the world such tasteful programs as "Married By America" had the nerve to pass judgment on GoDaddy is beyond me.</p>
<p><object width="425" height="344"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/HhFMD6ybP2E&amp;hl=en&amp;fs=1"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/HhFMD6ybP2E&amp;hl=en&amp;fs=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="344"></embed></object></p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/09/09/ads-gone-bad-godaddys-racy-add-too-hot-for-the-super-bowl/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Ads Gone Bad: GoDaddy's racy ad too hot for the Super Bowl</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/09/09/ads-gone-bad-godaddys-racy-add-too-hot-for-the-super-bowl/">Ads Gone Bad: GoDaddy's racy ad too hot for the Super Bowl</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 09 Sep 2008 12:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/09/09/ads-gone-bad-godaddys-racy-add-too-hot-for-the-super-bowl/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1301372/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/09/09/ads-gone-bad-godaddys-racy-add-too-hot-for-the-super-bowl/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Ads Gone Bad</category><category>Bob Parsons</category><category>Fox TV</category><category>godaddy</category><category>godaddy.com</category><category>Super Bowl</category><category>Super bowl ads</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jonathan Berr]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 09 Sep 2008 12:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Ads Gone Bad: Pandas aren't cute when they're racist, Salesgenie]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/09/05/ads-gone-bad-pandas-arent-cute-when-theyre-racist-salesgenie/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/09/05/ads-gone-bad-pandas-arent-cute-when-theyre-racist-salesgenie/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/09/05/ads-gone-bad-pandas-arent-cute-when-theyre-racist-salesgenie/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/bad-news/" rel="tag">Bad News</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/consumer-experience/" rel="tag">Consumer Experience</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/marketing-and-advertising/" rel="tag">Marketing and Advertising</a></p><p><em><img  alt="" hspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/09/ads-gone-bad-sales-genie-200cs082808.jpg" align="right" vspace="4" border="1" />This post is part of our <strong><a href="http://money.aol.com/special/ads-gone-bad">Ads Gone Bad</a></strong> series. Share your thoughts and memories of this ad in the comments, and be sure to check out our other posts on marketing gone wrong.</em></p>
<p>If Americans are sensitive about racial issues, it's not without reason. Consider the Trail of Tears, or slavery, or the internment of the Japanese during World War II, and it's clear that we've breached more than our fair share of ethical boundaries. But, judging by the reaction to a Salesgenie ad that aired during Super Bowl XLII in 2008, we've also come a long way.</p>
<p>If the upset victory pulled off by the New York Giants in that game was shocking, so was the approach taken by Salesgenie.com's marketing masterminds. The commercial in question featured a pair of talking cartoon pandas, complete with Chinese accents -- a married couple, to be exact, and the apparent proprietors of Ling Ling's Bamboo Furniture Shack. (<a href="http://www.mahalo.com/SalesGenie_Panda_Bear_Super_Bowl_Ad">Click here</a> to watch the ad.)</p>
<p>The storyline of the commercial is not too shocking: business is bad; nagging wife doesn't want to move back to the zoo; husband turns to Salesgenie.com for free sales leads; now, business is great! In other words, it's not nearly as appalling as some old, World War II-era Looney Tunes clips (<a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3_km9IFzzHo&amp;feature=related">don't click here</a> if you're easily offended).</p>
<p>However, there was something distinctly off-putting about the Salesgenie pandas, with their broken English and their misspelled "Sofaz" sign. I remember seeing it myself and thinking, "Well, that's bold." It turns out the rest of the viewing public was equally unsettled, and the negative feedback was sufficient to result in the ad being <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2008/02/06/business/media/06adco.html?_r=1&amp;th=&amp;adxnnl=1&amp;oref=slogin&amp;emc=th&amp;adxnnlx=1219964448-bZFOOx3cC/0As1IfNFI6Ww">pulled from the airwaves</a>.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/09/05/ads-gone-bad-pandas-arent-cute-when-theyre-racist-salesgenie/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Ads Gone Bad: Pandas aren't cute when they're racist, Salesgenie</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/09/05/ads-gone-bad-pandas-arent-cute-when-theyre-racist-salesgenie/">Ads Gone Bad: Pandas aren't cute when they're racist, Salesgenie</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 05 Sep 2008 12:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/09/05/ads-gone-bad-pandas-arent-cute-when-theyre-racist-salesgenie/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1298499/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/09/05/ads-gone-bad-pandas-arent-cute-when-theyre-racist-salesgenie/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Ads Gone Bad</category><category>commercial</category><category>infoGROUP</category><category>IUSA</category><category>pandas</category><category>racist</category><category>Super Bowl</category><category>SuperBowl</category><category>vinod gupta</category><category>VinodGupta</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Elizabeth Harrow]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 05 Sep 2008 12:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Ads Gone Bad: Snickers tries to make people snigger at gays]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/09/05/ads-gone-bad-snickers-tries-to-make-people-snigger-at-gays/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/09/05/ads-gone-bad-snickers-tries-to-make-people-snigger-at-gays/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/09/05/ads-gone-bad-snickers-tries-to-make-people-snigger-at-gays/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/consumer-experience/" rel="tag">Consumer Experience</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/marketing-and-advertising/" rel="tag">Marketing and Advertising</a></p><p><em><img  alt="" hspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/09/ads-gone-bad-snickers-200cs082808.jpg" align="right" vspace="4" border="1" />This post is part of our <strong><a href="http://money.aol.com/special/ads-gone-bad">Ads Gone Bad</a></strong> series. Share your thoughts and memories of this ad in the comments, and be sure to check out our other posts on marketing gone wrong.</em></p>
<p><a href="http://www.mars.com/global/Who+We+Are/Global+Structure/Global+structure.htm">Mars Inc.</a>, has made not just one, but two ad campaigns for its popular Snickers bar seem to sneer at gays. Mars, one of the biggest privately held, family-owned companies, makes many of the world's most popular candies: Snickers, M&amp;Ms, Twix, Starburst (along with Uncle Ben's Rice and pet food like Whiskas), but both of the ads gay rights groups found offensive were for the Snickers bar.</p>
<p>The first gay-themed Snickers ad made a big splash in Super Bowl XLI in 2007. Two mechanics get so wrapped up in eating the opposite ends of Snickers bar that their lips touch, prompting them to decide to "do something manly" lest they accidentally catch gayness -- so they pull their chest hair out.</p>
<p><object width="425" height="349"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/EjuXbYW6KmE&amp;hl=en&amp;fs=1&amp;color1=0xe1600f&amp;color2=0xfebd01&amp;border=1"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/EjuXbYW6KmE&amp;hl=en&amp;fs=1&amp;color1=0xe1600f&amp;color2=0xfebd01&amp;border=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="349"></embed></object></p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/09/05/ads-gone-bad-snickers-tries-to-make-people-snigger-at-gays/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Ads Gone Bad: Snickers tries to make people snigger at gays</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/09/05/ads-gone-bad-snickers-tries-to-make-people-snigger-at-gays/">Ads Gone Bad: Snickers tries to make people snigger at gays</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 05 Sep 2008 08:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/09/05/ads-gone-bad-snickers-tries-to-make-people-snigger-at-gays/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1301796/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/09/05/ads-gone-bad-snickers-tries-to-make-people-snigger-at-gays/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Ads Gone Bad</category><category>advertising</category><category>gay</category><category>homophobia</category><category>homophobic</category><category>mars</category><category>snickers</category><category>super bowl</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Carol Vinzant]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 05 Sep 2008 08:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Next year's Super Bowl 30-second ad: $3 million]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/05/06/next-years-super-bowl-30-second-ad-3-million/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/05/06/next-years-super-bowl-30-second-ad-3-million/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/05/06/next-years-super-bowl-30-second-ad-3-million/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/ge/" rel="tag">General Electric (GE)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/marketing-and-advertising/" rel="tag">Marketing and Advertising</a></p><img width="107" vspace="4" hspace="4" height="137" border="0" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/05/nfl.jpg" alt="" /><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/general-electric-company/ge/nys">General Electric Co.</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/general-electric-company/ge/nys">GE</a>)'s NBC Universal unit will charge $3 million per 30-second advertising spot in the 2009 Super Bowl, according to the <a style="font-style: italic;" href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB121004269277469845.html?mod=googlenews_wsj">Wall Street Journal</a> (subscription required). Is it me, or does that strike anyone as particularly insane? The deal is this: I would be that many disinterested fans watch the Super Bowl just for the ads alone. The reason? These are the best of the best, attention-grabbing and inventive commercials.<br /><br />So, why don't ad agencies and PR flacks do this the rest of the year? The only Super Bowl ad that stuck in my mind this year was <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vgtfC5LBAW4">Tide's 'talking stain" ad</a>, which probably cost a few dollars to produce and was enormously effective. The cost of the campaign was the cost of the ad, of course. All those other advertisers that spend millions on Super Bowl ads this year? Can't remember one of them.<br /><br />The price for a 2008 Super Bowl 30-second ad spot was $2.7 million, so NBC is upping the game here a bit. Is that ad inventory worth it? With media changing all the time, television is still a lucrative game, and smart advertisers are combining the web and television into complementary market platforms. Like the Tide commercial referenced above, the entire ad was designed to drive traffic to <a href="http://www.mytalkingstain.com">MyTalkingStain.com</a>, not to your local supermarket to buy the product. That's smart marketing. If you spent $3 million for an ad, would you want the impact of the web to somehow be involved? I thought so -- but not all ads do, apparently.<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/05/06/next-years-super-bowl-30-second-ad-3-million/">Next year's Super Bowl 30-second ad: $3 million</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 06 May 2008 11:11:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://online.wsj.com/article/SB121004269277469845.html?mod=googlenews_wsj>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/05/06/next-years-super-bowl-30-second-ad-3-million/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1187577/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/05/06/next-years-super-bowl-30-second-ad-3-million/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>advertising</category><category>GE</category><category>inthenews</category><category>NBC</category><category>NBC Super Bowl</category><category>NbcSuperBowl</category><category>Super Bowl</category><category>Super bowl Ads</category><category>SuperBowl</category><category>SuperBowlAds</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Brian White]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 06 May 2008 11:11:00 EST</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
