<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd">
<channel>
<title>BloggingStocks</title>
<link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com</link>
<description>BloggingStocks</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA['Transformers' and 'Shrek' flex muscles: A review of the summer blockbusters]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/09/25/transformers-and-shrek-flex-muscles-a-eview-of-summer-block/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/09/25/transformers-and-shrek-flex-muscles-a-eview-of-summer-block/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/09/25/transformers-and-shrek-flex-muscles-a-eview-of-summer-block/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/ge/" rel="tag">General Electric (GE)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/twx/" rel="tag">Time Warner (TWX)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/dis/" rel="tag">Walt Disney (DIS)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/via/" rel="tag">Viacom (VIA)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/sne/" rel="tag">Sony Corp ADR (SNE)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/nws/" rel="tag">News Corp'B' (NWS)</a></p><a href="http://www.theflyonthewall.com/splashPage.php?source=AOL"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/09/fly-logo-(aol).gif" alt="" /></a>This summer was a very profitable one for box offices nationwide, with four movies grossing over $300M, and at least another nine grossing over $100M -- signaling in a big way the resurgence of the movie industry, which had been struggling for the last few years.<br /><br />The four big $300M+ winners of the summer were <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/sony-corporation/sne/nys">Sony Corporation (ADR)</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/sony-corporation/sne/nys">SNE</a>) 's<em>Spider-Man 3</em>, which grossed $336M in the U.S., <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/viacom-inc-cl-a/via/nys">Viacom, Inc</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/viacom-inc-cl-a/via/nys">VIA</a>)'s Paramount's <em>Shrek the Third</em>, which grossed $320M, <em>Transformers</em>, also from Paramount, which grossed $311M, and <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/the-walt-disney-company/dis/nys">The Walt Disney Company</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/the-walt-disney-company/dis/nys">DIS</a>)'s <em>Pirates of the Caribbean: At World's End</em>, which grossed $308M. <br /><br />Three of the four were third installments of well established big-budget franchises, so their success is hardly shocking, but the <em>Transformers</em> success clearly marks the start of a new blockbuster franchise (the <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2007/09/24/transformers-2-gets-a-release-date/">release date of the sequel</a> has been announced -- June 26, 2009). The robot-action extravaganza, which was directed by Michael Bay, was definitely a surprise, as I remarked in my <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/04/30/spiderman-3-everything-3-preview-of-potential-summer-block/">summer movie preview</a> that <em>Transformers</em> "has flop written all over it... there cannot possibly be enough substance in a story about alien robots that transform into vehicles to make this a hit with the general public." I was wrong -- very wrong. The movie killed at the box office, grossing over $330M on a $150M budget, and prompting a <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2007/08/19/extended-cut-of-transformers-hits-imax-next-month/">re-release on IMAX</a>, which opened last week.<br /><br /><em><br /></em><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/09/25/transformers-and-shrek-flex-muscles-a-eview-of-summer-block/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>'Transformers' and 'Shrek' flex muscles: A review of the summer blockbusters</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/09/25/transformers-and-shrek-flex-muscles-a-eview-of-summer-block/">'Transformers' and 'Shrek' flex muscles: A review of the summer blockbusters</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 25 Sep 2007 17:46:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/09/25/transformers-and-shrek-flex-muscles-a-eview-of-summer-block/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/994529/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/09/25/transformers-and-shrek-flex-muscles-a-eview-of-summer-block/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>20th century fox</category><category>20thCenturyFox</category><category>28 weeks later</category><category>28WeeksLater</category><category>blockbuster</category><category>cinema</category><category>dis</category><category>disney</category><category>evan almighty</category><category>EvanAlmighty</category><category>expire-images:2008-9-24</category><category>film</category><category>ge</category><category>general electric</category><category>GeneralElectric</category><category>golden compass</category><category>GoldenCompass</category><category>harry potter</category><category>HarryPotter</category><category>hulk</category><category>imax</category><category>indiana jones</category><category>IndianaJones</category><category>iron man</category><category>IronMan</category><category>knocked up</category><category>KnockedUp</category><category>movie</category><category>new line cinemas</category><category>NewLineCinemas</category><category>news corp</category><category>NewsCorp</category><category>nws</category><category>paramount</category><category>pineapple express</category><category>PineappleExpress</category><category>pirates of the caribbean</category><category>PiratesOfTheCaribbean</category><category>pixar</category><category>punisher</category><category>rush hour 3</category><category>RushHour3</category><category>shrek the third</category><category>ShrekTheThird</category><category>sne</category><category>sony</category><category>spider-man 3</category><category>Spider-man3</category><category>summer</category><category>superbad</category><category>time warner</category><category>TimeWarner</category><category>transformers</category><category>twx</category><category>universal</category><category>via</category><category>viacom</category><category>wall-e</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Eric Buscemi]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 25 Sep 2007 17:46:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA['Superbad' was super good to Sony (SNE)]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/08/20/superbad-was-super-good-to-sony-sne/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/08/20/superbad-was-super-good-to-sony-sne/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/08/20/superbad-was-super-good-to-sony-sne/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/twx/" rel="tag">Time Warner (TWX)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/sne/" rel="tag">Sony Corp ADR (SNE)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/film/" rel="tag">Film</a></p><a href="http://www.theflyonthewall.com/splashPage.php?source=AOL"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/08/aol-fly-logo.gif" alt="" /></a><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/sony-corporation/sne/nys">Sony Corp</a>'s (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/sony-corporation/sne/nys">SNE</a>) "Superbad" ruled the weekend box office, raking in $31.2 million to become the No. 1 movie, according to estimates on Sunday. The teen comedy knocked off last weekend's top flick, New Line Cinema's "Rush Hour 3" to second place, and forced <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/time-warner-inc/twx/nys?tabs=quotesandnews">Warner Brother</a>'s (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/time-warner-inc/twx/nys?tabs=quotesandnews">TWX</a>) "The Invasion," which stars veteran actress Nicole Kidman and the latest "James Bond," Daniel Craig, to open at No. 5. <br /><br />Creating box-office hits seems to be a pattern for Judd Apatow, who has also directed "Knocked Up" and "The 40-Year-Old Virgin". In Apatow teamed up with Seth Rogen who coincidentally also starred in "Knocked Up", "The 40-Year-Old Virgin" and several other Apatow films. The pair has worked together for over a decade.<br /><br />Sony had modest expectations for "Superbad" to earn somewhere in the $25 million range, despite having a production budget of $20 million. The $31 million dollar opening weekend was similar to Knocked Up, which opened with $30.7 million and went on to hit $100 million in sales. <br /><br />Paul Derarabedian, president of box-office tracker Media By Numbers, believes that Apatow is a brand now, specializing in movies that appeal to older audiences who follow whatever he does, according to the <a href="http://money.aol.com/news/articles/_a/superbad-delivers-super-debut-with-312/n20070819144509990004"><em>Associated Press</em></a>. Apatow is currently working on <a href="http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0031976/">6 films</a>, including one with Will Ferrell and Adam Sandler, and two with long-time partner Seth Rogen. Unfortunately for Sony, they entertainment giant will not be involved in any of Apatow's next six films.<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/08/20/superbad-was-super-good-to-sony-sne/">'Superbad' was super good to Sony (SNE)</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 20 Aug 2007 16:15:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://money.aol.com/news/articles/_a/superbad-delivers-super-debut-with-312/n20070819144509990004>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/08/20/superbad-was-super-good-to-sony-sne/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/969269/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/08/20/superbad-was-super-good-to-sony-sne/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Apatow</category><category>cera</category><category>craig</category><category>hill</category><category>kidman</category><category>knocked up</category><category>KnockedUp</category><category>new line cinema</category><category>NewLineCinema</category><category>rogen</category><category>rush hour 3</category><category>RushHour3</category><category>sne</category><category>sony</category><category>superbad</category><category>the invasion</category><category>TheInvasion</category><category>time warner</category><category>TimeWarner</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Kevin Shult]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 20 Aug 2007 16:15:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Evan Almighty's arc just sank]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/06/25/evan-almightys-arc-just-sank/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/06/25/evan-almightys-arc-just-sank/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/06/25/evan-almightys-arc-just-sank/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/bad-news/" rel="tag">Bad News</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/industry/" rel="tag">Industry</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/consumer-experience/" rel="tag">Consumer Experience</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/ge/" rel="tag">General Electric (GE)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/twx/" rel="tag">Time Warner (TWX)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/dis/" rel="tag">Walt Disney (DIS)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/via/" rel="tag">Viacom (VIA)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/sne/" rel="tag">Sony Corp ADR (SNE)</a></p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/06/23/what-happens-if-universal-pictures-evan-almighty-flops/"><img align="right" style="width: 183px; height: 123px;" alt="" src="http://www.tublogdecine.es/wp-content/themes/Cinestar2/img/almighty.bmp" />I recently blogged</a> about my concerns if <span style="font-style: italic;">Evan Almighty</span> flopped this weekend.<br /><br />I, as well as many others, would classify the $32.1 million opening weekend of <span style="font-style: italic;">Evan as </span>a flop. <a style="font-style: italic;" href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB118270646516746291.html?mod=home_whats_news_us">Peter Sanders of the WSJ </a>believes that <span style="font-style: italic;">Evan Almighty</span> was the first "major pothole" in Hollywood's sequel-filled summer. He also put <span style="font-style: italic;">Evan </span>in the same category as <span style="font-style: italic;">Spider-Man 3, Shrek the Third and Pirates of the Caribbean: At World's End</span>, by saying May's blockbuster "threequels" were all expected to fall short of their previous domestic sales numbers. <br /><br />Could that be true? <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB118270646516746291.html?mod=home_whats_news_us">Looking at the numbers,</a> Sanders has a good argument. That's only if you thought sequels should outperform the original. Other than <span style="font-style: italic;">Shrek II,</span> most of the recent sequels made less than its predecessors. Even the Harry Potter franchise couldn't make a sequel that outperformed the $317.5 million earned from <span style="font-style: italic;">Sorcerer's Stone</span>.<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/06/25/evan-almightys-arc-just-sank/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Evan Almighty's arc just sank</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/06/25/evan-almightys-arc-just-sank/">Evan Almighty's arc just sank</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 25 Jun 2007 19:50:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/06/25/evan-almightys-arc-just-sank/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/926349/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/06/25/evan-almightys-arc-just-sank/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>bourne</category><category>bruce almighty</category><category>BruceAlmighty</category><category>carell</category><category>dis</category><category>disney</category><category>evan almighty</category><category>EvanAlmighty</category><category>ge</category><category>general electric</category><category>GeneralElectric</category><category>harry potter</category><category>HarryPotter</category><category>hollywood</category><category>hot rod</category><category>HotRod</category><category>lasseter</category><category>mummy</category><category>narnia</category><category>paramount</category><category>pirates</category><category>pixar</category><category>sequel</category><category>shadyac</category><category>shrek</category><category>sisterhood</category><category>sne</category><category>sony</category><category>sorcerer's stone</category><category>Sorcerer'sStone</category><category>spider man</category><category>SpiderMan</category><category>steve jobs</category><category>SteveJobs</category><category>superbad</category><category>Time Warner</category><category>TimeWarner</category><category>TWX</category><category>universal pictures</category><category>UniversalPictures</category><category>VIA</category><category>viacom</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Kevin Shult]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 25 Jun 2007 19:50:00 EST</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
