<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd">
<channel>
<title>BloggingStocks</title>
<link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com</link>
<description>BloggingStocks</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[OPEC: Increasing oil output won't help prices]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/11/15/opec-increasing-oil-output-wont-help-prices/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/11/15/opec-increasing-oil-output-wont-help-prices/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/11/15/opec-increasing-oil-output-wont-help-prices/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/international-markets/" rel="tag">International Markets</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/forecasts/" rel="tag">Forecasts</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/bad-news/" rel="tag">Bad News</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/economic-data/" rel="tag">Economic Data</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/oil/" rel="tag">Oil</a></p><p>One of the most novel arguments against raising oil production is that it won't help decrease prices. That may seem counter-intuitive, but it is what the ministers of OPEC want consuming nations to believe. </p>
<p>Algeria's Energy and Mines Minister Chakib Khelil <a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/ousiv/idUSSP30399920071115">told</a> Reuters<em>,</em> "We have all the factors that impact the price, so if we increase, we are going to have the same phenomenon that happened before, which means, it may not even impact on the price." He may have missed the "supply and demand" lecture in his college economics course. </p>
<p>OPEC has several reasons for not improving supply, but the idea that it will not affect prices is absurd. Just the announcement of improved output from the cartel could cause a stampede of selling in oil futures.</p>
What OPEC does want are guarantees from the big consuming nations, especially China and the U.S., that they will not invest too much in nuclear power and biofuels. The producing nations want to know that there will be oil demand two and three decades out. They are making plenty of money now, but will that continue in 2030?<br />The attitude being taken by OPEC is that it will not increase output in December. That could cause prices to rise again. But a promise of dialing back alternative energy development that might cut oil demand would almost certainly get more shipments of crude moving.
<p><em>Douglas A. McIntyre is an editor at </em><em>247wallst.com. </em></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/11/15/opec-increasing-oil-output-wont-help-prices/">OPEC: Increasing oil output won't help prices</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 15 Nov 2007 04:45:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.reuters.com/article/ousiv/idUSSP30399920071115>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/11/15/opec-increasing-oil-output-wont-help-prices/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1040587/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/11/15/opec-increasing-oil-output-wont-help-prices/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>alternative energy</category><category>alternative fuels</category><category>AlternativeEnergy</category><category>AlternativeFuels</category><category>demand</category><category>inthenews</category><category>oil</category><category>OPEC</category><category>supply</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Douglas McIntyre]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 15 Nov 2007 04:45:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Home Depot sheds some dead weight]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/06/19/home-depot-sheds-some-dead-weight/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/06/19/home-depot-sheds-some-dead-weight/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/06/19/home-depot-sheds-some-dead-weight/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/deals/" rel="tag">Deals</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/rumors/" rel="tag">Rumors</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/competitive-strategy/" rel="tag">Competitive Strategy</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/wmt/" rel="tag">Wal-Mart (WMT)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/hd/" rel="tag">Home Depot (HD)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/low/" rel="tag">Lowe's Cos (LOW)</a></p><img width="131" height="170" align="right" src="http://homedepot.com.mx/hdmx/esmx/images/apron.jpg" alt="" />According to sources, <a href="http://www.bloggingbuyouts.com/bain-capital/">Bain Capital,</a> <a href="http://www.bloggingbuyouts.com/the-carlyle-group/">Carlyle Group </a>and <a href="http://www.bloggingbuyouts.com/clayton-dubilier-rice-inc/">Clayton, Dubilier &amp; Rice</a> have won the $10 billion auction for <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/the-home-depot-inc/hd/nys">Home Depot's</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/the-home-depot-inc/hd/nys">HD</a>) Supply Unit and were finalizing the deal today, Reuters reports.<br /> <br />Several <a href="http://www.bloggingbuyouts.com/">private equity</a> groups had shown interest in HD Supply, which sells business materials, waste water and utility products to municipalities and contractors, but because of the ongoing slump in the U.S. housing market, those firms backed away. <br /><br />The $10 billion price tag was somewhat lower than some investors and analysts expected, according to Farr Miller's Keith Davis, which owns Home Depot shares. The winning group outbid an offer from <a href="http://www.bloggingbuyouts.com/thomas-h-lee-partners/">Thomas H. Lee Partners</a> and CCMP Capital.<br /><br />By selling off HD Supply, Home Depot will now be able to better focus on the retail division and its arch competitor, <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/lowe-s-companies-inc/low/nys?tabs=quotesandnews">Lowe's</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/lowe-s-companies-inc/low/nys?tabs=quotesandnews">LOW</a>). That's something ex-CEO Bob Nardelli failed to realize about the low-margin Supply division throughout his six-year tenure.<br /><br />With Home Depot's retail unit slumping and the need to get back to basics, I certainly hope management doesn't make any aesthetic changes, similar to <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/wal-mart-stores-inc/wmt/nys?tabs=quotesandnews">Wal-Mart's </a>(NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/wal-mart-stores-inc/wmt/nys?tabs=quotesandnews">WMT</a>) change to polo's and khakis. Could you imagine a Home Depot employee in khakis, without his trusty orange apron?<br /><br /><em>Kevin Shult is a writer for <a href="http://www.theflyonthewall.com/splashPage.php?source=AOL">TheFlyOnTheWall.com</a> (subscription required).</em><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/06/19/home-depot-sheds-some-dead-weight/">Home Depot sheds some dead weight</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 19 Jun 2007 15:15:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/06/19/home-depot-sheds-some-dead-weight/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/921747/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/06/19/home-depot-sheds-some-dead-weight/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>bain capital</category><category>BainCapital</category><category>carlyle group</category><category>CarlyleGroup</category><category>hd</category><category>home depot</category><category>HomeDepot</category><category>low</category><category>lowes</category><category>nardelli</category><category>supply</category><category>wal mart</category><category>WalMart</category><category>wmmt</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Kevin Shult]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 19 Jun 2007 15:15:00 EST</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
