<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd">
<channel>
<title>BloggingStocks</title>
<link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com</link>
<description>BloggingStocks</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Poll: Americans more-optimistic about U.S. economy, president's performance]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/04/07/poll-americans-more-optimistic-about-u-s-economy-presidents/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/04/07/poll-americans-more-optimistic-about-u-s-economy-presidents/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/04/07/poll-americans-more-optimistic-about-u-s-economy-presidents/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/forecasts/" rel="tag">Forecasts</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/good-news/" rel="tag">Good news</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/headline-news/" rel="tag">Headline News</a></p><p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.dailyfinance.com/media/2009/04/barack_obama_flag_200.jpg" alt="" />Despite a deepening job slump and few signs that the recession that began in December 2007 is nearing an end, Americans have grown more optimistic about the U.S. economy and the country's direction in the 11 weeks since the inauguration of President Obama, the latest <a href="http://documents.nytimes.com/new-york-times-cbs-news-poll-on-the-approval-ratings-of-president-barack-obama#p=2">New York Times/CBS News poll shows</a>.</p>
<p>Further, Americans approve of President Obama's handling of the economy, foreign policy, (wars in Iraq and Afghanistan), and two-thirds said they approved of his overall job performance.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/04/07/poll-americans-more-optimistic-about-u-s-economy-presidents/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Poll: Americans more-optimistic about U.S. economy, president's performance</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/04/07/poll-americans-more-optimistic-about-u-s-economy-presidents/">Poll: Americans more-optimistic about U.S. economy, president's performance</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 07 Apr 2009 15:50:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/04/07/poll-americans-more-optimistic-about-u-s-economy-presidents/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1510252/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/04/07/poll-americans-more-optimistic-about-u-s-economy-presidents/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>approval rating</category><category>CBS</category><category>CBS Corp.</category><category>Democratic Party</category><category>New York Times</category><category>NYT</category><category>Obama</category><category>optimism</category><category>polls</category><category>President Obama</category><category>public opinion</category><category>Republican Party</category><category>survey research</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Joseph Lazzaro]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 07 Apr 2009 15:50:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[When evaluating economic polls, subtract 15-20% ]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/20/when-evaluating-economic-polls-subtract-15-20/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/20/when-evaluating-economic-polls-subtract-15-20/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/20/when-evaluating-economic-polls-subtract-15-20/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/politics/" rel="tag">Politics</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/recession/" rel="tag">Recession</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/financial-crisis/" rel="tag">Financial Crisis</a></p>A note on economic polls: when evaluating them, subtract 15-20%. Case in point: U.S. public opinion toward outgoing President George W. Bush. <br /><br />A <a href="http://www.cnn.com/2009/POLITICS/01/14/bush.political.legacy/?iref=hpmostpop">CNN/Opinion Research Corporation poll</a> taken in December 2008 found the following: <br /><br />Despite the worst U.S. recession in decades, rising unemployment, declining median incomes, unprecedented home foreclosures, massive U.S. government borrowing to bailout / rescue the bank sector, and the lowest job creation of any eight-year president in the modern era, the poll found that: <br />
<ul>
    <li>23% of the American people said they would miss Bush, 25% said Bush managed government effectively, and about a third said he would go down in history as a good president. </li>
</ul>
Roughly a third of Americans viewing Bush as a good president?, with 25% saying he managed the government effectively? What's going on here? <br /><br />Who are these people? Upper-income Americans or strong Republicans? <br /><br />Exactly: either, or possibly both, which is why you need to deduct 15-20% when reading a poll, to gauge a president's support, particularly on economic issues.<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/20/when-evaluating-economic-polls-subtract-15-20/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>When evaluating economic polls, subtract 15-20% </em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/20/when-evaluating-economic-polls-subtract-15-20/">When evaluating economic polls, subtract 15-20% </a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 20 Jan 2009 13:10:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/20/when-evaluating-economic-polls-subtract-15-20/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1434837/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/20/when-evaluating-economic-polls-subtract-15-20/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Bush</category><category>Bush administration</category><category>George W. Bush</category><category>polls</category><category>public opinion</category><category>survey research</category><category>SurveyResearch</category><category>U.S. economy</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Joseph Lazzaro]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 20 Jan 2009 13:10:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[The only poll that really counts is the one on Election Day, Tuesday, November 4]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/01/the-only-poll-that-really-counts-is-the-one-on-election-day-tue/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/01/the-only-poll-that-really-counts-is-the-one-on-election-day-tue/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/01/the-only-poll-that-really-counts-is-the-one-on-election-day-tue/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/politics/" rel="tag">Politics</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/presidential-elections/" rel="tag">Presidential Elections</a></p><p>Most major polls have <a href="https://donate.barackobama.com/page/contribute/imfrontrow?source=sem-reg-google-obamaterms-nsw-x5&amp;gclid=CNXymLGK1JYCFQVxFQod3nso2g">U.S. Sen. Barack Obama, D-Illinois</a>, leading <a href="http://www.johnmccain.com/landing/glc1.htm?sid=google&amp;t=gelac">U.S. Sen. John McCain, R-Arizona</a>, in the contest for U.S. president. And, if the election were held today, instead of on <a href="http://news.aol.com/elections">Tuesday, November 4, Election Day</a>, Obama would register a decisive victory in the all-important electoral college, as well as in the popular vote. </p>
<p>As of late Friday, <a href="http://www.npr.org/news/specials/election2008/2008-election-map.html#/president-nprOvM/">NPR.org's survey of polls</a> had the electoral vote at Obama, 291, McCain 163. Four battleground states are still in play: Ohio, where Obama lead by 5%; Florida, Obama by 3.5%; Indiana, McCain by 1.7%; and Missouri, McCain by about 0.5%. Concerning the national vote, on Friday, <a href="http://www.gallup.com/Home.aspx">Gallup.com's daily tracking poll</a> had Obama leading McCain, 52% to 41%. </p>
<p>Still, as most political aides will tell you, "the only poll that really counts is the one on Election Day, Tuesday, November 4." In other words, polls can err; that's why they have a margin of error, typically +/- 2%.</p>
<p>Polls only recently have become more accurate. Some notable poll mistakes include the <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1980_U.S._Presidential_election">1980 U.S. presidential election</a>, when some polls had incumbent <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jimmy_Carter">President Jimmy Carter, a Democrat</a> slightly ahead of the challenger, then <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ronald_Reagan">Gov. Ronald Reagan, a Republican</a>. Reagan, of course won the 1980 election in a landslide.</p>
<p><strong>Pres. Truman had the last laugh on pollers</strong></p>
<p>But the biggest polling error in a presidential election has to be the <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1948_U.S._Presidential_election">1948 election</a> between <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Harry_S._Truman">President Harry S. Truman, a Democrat</a>, and challenger <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thomas_E._Dewey">Gov. Thomas E. Dewey, a Republican</a>.</p>
<p>The polls predicted that Dewey would win by a large margin. They were wrong: Truman won a decisive victory, 303-189, in the electoral college.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/01/the-only-poll-that-really-counts-is-the-one-on-election-day-tue/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>The only poll that really counts is the one on Election Day, Tuesday, November 4</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/01/the-only-poll-that-really-counts-is-the-one-on-election-day-tue/">The only poll that really counts is the one on Election Day, Tuesday, November 4</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Sat, 01 Nov 2008 12:40:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/01/the-only-poll-that-really-counts-is-the-one-on-election-day-tue/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1359375/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/01/the-only-poll-that-really-counts-is-the-one-on-election-day-tue/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>2008 election</category><category>Barack Obama</category><category>John McCain</category><category>McCain</category><category>Obama</category><category>polling</category><category>polls</category><category>survey research</category><category>U.S. Presidency</category><category>voters</category><category>voting</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Joseph Lazzaro]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 01 Nov 2008 12:40:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[It's the economy, stupid]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/09/12/its-the-economy-stupid/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/09/12/its-the-economy-stupid/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/09/12/its-the-economy-stupid/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/politics/" rel="tag">Politics</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/presidential-elections/" rel="tag">Presidential Elections</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/recession/" rel="tag">Recession</a></p><img alt="" hspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/06/obama-mccain.jpg" align="right" vspace="4" />Historically, the vote for U.S. president hinges on three factors: a voter's party identification, the voter's attitude toward the candidate, and 'a most important issue.' (See: Campbell, Converse, Miller and Stokes, <a href="http://www.amazon.com/American-Voter-Angus-Campbell/dp/0226092542/ref=pd_bbs_sr_1?ie=UTF8&amp;s=books&amp;qid=1221085429&amp;sr=1-1">The American Voter</a>.)<br /><br />Some voters cite two or three most important issues, but most have only one. One such issue that has repeatedly shown up in survey research dating back to 1952 as a factor affecting vote is the U.S. economy. <br /><br />In general the rule is that if the U.S. economy is doing well, the party in power -- the party occupying the White House -- is re-elected. <br /><br />If the economy is doing poorly, the party in power is voted out of office. In other words, if the economy isn't doing well, the American people "throw the rascals out," as my Ph.D. advisor, Professor Sarah Morehouse, UConn professor emeritus of political science, used to say. <br /><br /><strong>The U.S. President as manager of the economy</strong><br /><br />It matters not if the president caused the damage. On many occasions the president rarely is entirely at fault, but it doesn't matter -- the president is still held accountable for the economy's performance. If the economy's strong, the president gets the credit; if the economy's in poor condition -- the blame.<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/09/12/its-the-economy-stupid/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>It's the economy, stupid</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/09/12/its-the-economy-stupid/">It's the economy, stupid</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 12 Sep 2008 10:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/09/12/its-the-economy-stupid/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1310644/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/09/12/its-the-economy-stupid/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>2008 election</category><category>Democrats</category><category>featured</category><category>gdp</category><category>Independents</category><category>McCain</category><category>Obama</category><category>Republicans</category><category>survey research</category><category>U.S. economy</category><category>U.S. presidency</category><category>voters</category><category>voting</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Joseph Lazzaro]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 12 Sep 2008 10:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[The 2008 U.S. Presidential race heats up]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/09/09/the-2008-u-s-presidential-race-heats-up/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/09/09/the-2008-u-s-presidential-race-heats-up/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/09/09/the-2008-u-s-presidential-race-heats-up/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/politics/" rel="tag">Politics</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/presidential-elections/" rel="tag">Presidential Elections</a></p><img hspace="4" vspace="4" border="1" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/09/flag.jpg" />Although it may seem like it's been going on for a long time, the sprint called the U.S. presidential campaign has just started.<br /><br />Maybe you just <em>wish</em> the race was over by now?<br /><br />True, given the near-continual political coverage of the primaries and general election campaign on 24-hour, cable broadcast news networks MSNBC (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/general-electric-company/ge/nys">GE</a>), CNN (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/time-warner-inc/twx/nys">TWX</a>), and Fox News (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/news-corporation/nws/nys">NWS</a>), it probably seems like the campaigns have been going on since the dawn of recorded history. <br /><br />But, really, the political calculus becomes substantive after Labor Day, primarily because the polls are more telling. The summer polls are less-predictive/less-reliable because, in a nutshell, Americans have vacations and summer leisure activities on their minds. <br /><strong><br />The Gallup Poll</strong><br /><br /><a href="http://www.johnmccain.com/">U.S. Senator John McCain, R-Arizona,</a> has pushed ahead of <a href="http://www.barackobama.com/index.php">U.S. Senator Barack Obama, D-Illinois,</a> 49%-44%, in the <a href="http://www.gallup.com/poll/110143/Gallup-Daily-McCain-Maintains-5Point-Lead.aspx">Gallup tracking poll,</a> as of interviews conducted through September 8. There are several, accurate polls one can monitor, but the recommendation here is to follow Gallup, given the organization's strong performance record in survey research. <br /><br />Look for McCain's percentage to fall and Obama's percentage to rise as the 'bounce' that McCain received stemming from the Republican National Convention fades. Almost all candidates get a 'bounce,' or an increase in voter support, coming out of their party's nominating convention. But know also that at least a portion of this bounce typically disappears in a week or two. The conventions are largely four-day advertorials for the candidates and they tend to sway selected voters, but only temporarily. As the convention hype fades, voters look at the candidates more-critically, which accounts for the dip in support.<br /><br />However, if McCain's bounce doesn't disappear before September 26, or if his support continues to increase, then most likely some other factor is at work, boosting the Republican U.S. Senator. And given her newness to the campaign and the national political stage, it's most likely Vice Presidential Nominee Gov. Sarah Palin, R-Alaska. But don't draw any conclusions about Palin yet: let's see what the Gallup Poll looks like in a week or so before forming any conclusions about her impact.<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/09/09/the-2008-u-s-presidential-race-heats-up/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>The 2008 U.S. Presidential race heats up</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/09/09/the-2008-u-s-presidential-race-heats-up/">The 2008 U.S. Presidential race heats up</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 09 Sep 2008 17:45:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/09/09/the-2008-u-s-presidential-race-heats-up/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1309336/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/09/09/the-2008-u-s-presidential-race-heats-up/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>2008 election</category><category>Barack Obama</category><category>battleground states</category><category>Democrats</category><category>electoral college</category><category>electoral votes</category><category>Gallup Poll</category><category>Independents</category><category>John McCain</category><category>McCain</category><category>Obama</category><category>polling</category><category>polls</category><category>presidential debates</category><category>Republicans</category><category>survey research</category><category>U.S. Presidency</category><category>voters</category><category>voting</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Joseph Lazzaro]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 09 Sep 2008 17:45:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Young adult vote could surge in 2008, driven by Obama, Internet factors]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/02/12/young-adult-vote-could-surge-in-2008-driven-by-obama-internet/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/02/12/young-adult-vote-could-surge-in-2008-driven-by-obama-internet/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/02/12/young-adult-vote-could-surge-in-2008-driven-by-obama-internet/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/politics/" rel="tag">Politics</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/presidential-elections/" rel="tag">Presidential Elections</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/02/obamapict..jpg" />Social scientists, unlike some journalists, are reluctant to label anything a trend until they've amassed and evaluated a great deal of data often over years. A journalist can always cite a lack of information, or the crush of daily (and shorter) deadlines as a reason his/her news story did not describe reality, but if a social scientist errs in a refereed-article, well let's just say the action is not conducive to career advancement. <br /><br />And that's why many social scientists are reluctant to comment on the impact of Sen. Barack Obama's (D-IL) run for the U.S. presidency: it's way too early to articulate informed conclusions that are likely to endure. <br /><br />Still, that's not to say that one can't comment on developments that may -- and underscoring "may" -- be indicative of a trend. And along that line, here's what we know about the Obama candidacy regarding voting behavior:<span style="font-weight: bold;"></span><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/02/12/young-adult-vote-could-surge-in-2008-driven-by-obama-internet/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Young adult vote could surge in 2008, driven by Obama, Internet factors</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/02/12/young-adult-vote-could-surge-in-2008-driven-by-obama-internet/">Young adult vote could surge in 2008, driven by Obama, Internet factors</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 12 Feb 2008 12:20:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/02/12/young-adult-vote-could-surge-in-2008-driven-by-obama-internet/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1112451/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/02/12/young-adult-vote-could-surge-in-2008-driven-by-obama-internet/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>2000 election</category><category>2008 election</category><category>blogs</category><category>Bush</category><category>Clinton</category><category>Democrats</category><category>Gore</category><category>interest groups</category><category>Internet</category><category>McCain</category><category>Obama</category><category>public policy</category><category>Republicans</category><category>social network sites</category><category>survey research</category><category>U.S. Congress</category><category>U.S. presidency</category><category>voting</category><category>voting behavior</category><category>world wide web</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Joseph Lazzaro]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 12 Feb 2008 12:20:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[McCain is not your father's Republican Party nominee]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/02/11/mccain-is-not-your-fathers-republican-party-nominee/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/02/11/mccain-is-not-your-fathers-republican-party-nominee/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/02/11/mccain-is-not-your-fathers-republican-party-nominee/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/other-issues/" rel="tag">Other Issues</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/politics/" rel="tag">Politics</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/02/john_mccain_mark_wilson_20080211.jpg" />One of the Democratic Party's worst nightmares regarding the 2008 presidential election is coming to fruition: Sen. John McCain (R-Arizona) will be the Republican Party's nominee. <br /><br />Some investors / readers may argue that as a moderate, somewhat rebellious Republican and an advocate of the Iraq War, McCain will be a fairly easy candidate for the Democrats to oppose. Well, to borrow one of Vice President Gore's renowned, low-key allusions, <em>Now, I can see you really haven't researched the matter thoroughly. </em><br /><br />True, the short-term forces -- issues -- are against McCain. The economy is barely growing, or is already in a recession, and the Iraq War continues with little certainty regarding its outcome or ultimate impact. Further, because there's a Republican in the White House, the American people -- if decades of political science survey research mean anything -- will blame the party in power for not having solved the above problems, and this will take votes away from McCain.<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/02/11/mccain-is-not-your-fathers-republican-party-nominee/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>McCain is not your father's Republican Party nominee</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/02/11/mccain-is-not-your-fathers-republican-party-nominee/">McCain is not your father's Republican Party nominee</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 11 Feb 2008 14:35:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/02/11/mccain-is-not-your-fathers-republican-party-nominee/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1111266/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/02/11/mccain-is-not-your-fathers-republican-party-nominee/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>2008 election</category><category>attitude toward the candidate</category><category>barack obama</category><category>BarackObama</category><category>Clinton</category><category>featured</category><category>hillary clinton</category><category>HillaryClinton</category><category>issues</category><category>John McCain</category><category>McCain</category><category>Obama</category><category>party identification</category><category>party registration</category><category>primaries</category><category>primary season</category><category>Republican National Convention</category><category>republican party</category><category>RepublicanParty</category><category>survey research</category><category>U.S. presidency</category><category>voting behavior</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Joseph Lazzaro]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 11 Feb 2008 14:35:00 EST</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
