<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd">
<channel>
<title>BloggingStocks</title>
<link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com</link>
<description>BloggingStocks</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Potash Mulling Break-Up]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/10/11/potash-mulling-break-up/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/10/11/potash-mulling-break-up/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/10/11/potash-mulling-break-up/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/deals/" rel="tag">Deals</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/bhp/" rel="tag">BHP Billiton Ltd ADR (BHP)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/pot/" rel="tag">Potash Corp. of Saskatchewan (POT)</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2010/08/potash.jpg" alt="" />Canadian fertilizer firm Potash Corp of <span class="company">Saskatchewan </span>(<a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/potash-corporation-of-saskatchewan-inc/pot/nys" target="_blank">POT</a>) is in the middle of a rash of takeover-related news this morning. First, Britain's <em>Sunday Telegraph</em> reports that Potash is working on a break-up plan in hopes of stopping BHP Billiton's (<a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/bhp-billiton-limited/bhp/nys" target="_blank">BHP</a>) <a href="http://www.marketwatch.com/story/potash-corp-reportedly-working-on-break-up-plan-2010-10-10?dist=beforebell" target="_blank">takeover bid</a>. According to the report, Potash would sell its nitrogen and phosphorous assets, pay a $70 per share dividend, and increase its debt pile. <br />
<br />
In addition to the weekend's news, <a href="http://www.theglobeandmail.com/globe-investor/potash/chinese-seek-nod-from-ottawa-to-proceed-with-potash-acquisition/article1748789/"><em>The Globe and Mail</em></a> reported Friday that Chinese firm Sinochem has approached the National Mineral Development Corporation (NMDC) about a joint bid for Potash. Sinochem is making the pitch for a joint bid because it may believe that an individual bid would be shot down by Canada's political powers.<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/10/11/potash-mulling-break-up/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Potash Mulling Break-Up</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/10/11/potash-mulling-break-up/">Potash Mulling Break-Up</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 11 Oct 2010 09:40:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/10/11/potash-mulling-break-up/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19668823/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/10/11/potash-mulling-break-up/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>bhp</category><category>buyout</category><category>buyouts</category><category>featured</category><category>inthenews</category><category>potash</category><category>Sinochem</category><category>takeover</category><category>takeover bid</category><category>takeovers</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark Fightmaster]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 11 Oct 2010 09:40:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Palm Looking for Buyer]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/04/12/palm-looking-for-buyer/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/04/12/palm-looking-for-buyer/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/04/12/palm-looking-for-buyer/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/rumors/" rel="tag">Rumors</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/aapl/" rel="tag">Apple Inc (AAPL)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/rimm/" rel="tag">Research in Motion (RIMM)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/palm/" rel="tag">Palm Inc (PALM)</a></p><img hspace="4" align="right" vspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2010/03/palm-1269105756.jpg" alt="" />Palm (<a target="_blank" href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/palm-inc-new/palm/nas">PALM</a>) shares are up over 8% in premarket trading after Bloomberg reported the struggling smartphone maker has hired investment bankers Goldman Sachs and Qatalyst Partners to take <a target="_blank" href="http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&amp;sid=a6pU3a3o5vu8&amp;pos=7">bids for the company</a>, according to "people familiar with the situation." <br />
<br />
Palm faces an over-saturated market thanks to Apple (<a target="_blank" href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/apple-inc/aapl/nas">AAPL</a>) and Research in Motion (<a target="_blank" href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/research-in-motion-limited/rimm/nas">RIMM</a>). It has lost market share hand over fist to its two more-successful rivals. Fundamentally, the company may not offer inferior products to its two rivals, but Palm's latest smartphone is widely considered a flop compared to RIMM's and Apple's offerings. I am not saying that Palm's products are worse than Apple's and RIMM's, but perception can become reality, especially on Palm's bottom line.<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/04/12/palm-looking-for-buyer/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Palm Looking for Buyer</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/04/12/palm-looking-for-buyer/">Palm Looking for Buyer</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 12 Apr 2010 09:20:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/04/12/palm-looking-for-buyer/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19435573/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/04/12/palm-looking-for-buyer/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>featured</category><category>Goldman Sachs</category><category>inthenews</category><category>Palm</category><category>Qatalyst Partners</category><category>takeover</category><category>takeover bid</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark Fightmaster]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 12 Apr 2010 09:20:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[United Technologies offers $2.63 billion for Diebold]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/03/03/united-technologies-offers-2-63-billion-for-diebold/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/03/03/united-technologies-offers-2-63-billion-for-diebold/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/03/03/united-technologies-offers-2-63-billion-for-diebold/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/forecasts/" rel="tag">Forecasts</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/deals/" rel="tag">Deals</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/competitive-strategy/" rel="tag">Competitive Strategy</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/utx/" rel="tag">United Technologies (UTX)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/initial-public-offerings/" rel="tag">Initial Public Offerings</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/10/utx-united-technologies-logo.jpg" alt="" />Maker of Otis elevators and Chubb security systems, <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/united-technologies-corporation/utx/nys">United Technologies Corp</a>. (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/united-technologies-corporation/utx/nys">UTX</a>), announced Sunday that it had made an <a href="http://money.aol.com/news/articles/_a/united-tech-offers-263b-for-diebold/n20080302195109990032">unsolicited $2.63 billion offer</a> for <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/diebold-incorporated/dbd/nys">Diebold Inc</a>. (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/diebold-incorporated/dbd/nys">DBD</a>). Diebold is one of the largest makers of automated teller machines and voting machines, and United Tech's move comes as a part of its plan to extend its security business and presence in China.<br /><br />United Technologies announced it first approached Diebold about a possible deal two years ago but nothing had materialized thus far. United Tech announced that its current bid amounts to $40 a share, a 66% premium to Diebold's closing price of $24.12 on Friday. The company also said a it <a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601103&amp;sid=aUnwnjBME6Uk&amp;refer=us">may increase its offer</a> if it is sees more detailed information.<br /><br />George David, United Technologies' chairman and chief executive, stated that the "transaction creates significant and immediate value for Diebold shareholders with no operational risk, while creating long term value for UTC shareholders."<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/03/03/united-technologies-offers-2-63-billion-for-diebold/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>United Technologies offers $2.63 billion for Diebold</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/03/03/united-technologies-offers-2-63-billion-for-diebold/">United Technologies offers $2.63 billion for Diebold</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 03 Mar 2008 11:25:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://money.aol.com/news/articles/_a/united-tech-offers-263b-for-diebold/n20080302195109990032>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/03/03/united-technologies-offers-2-63-billion-for-diebold/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1129757/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/03/03/united-technologies-offers-2-63-billion-for-diebold/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>DBD</category><category>Diebold</category><category>inthenews</category><category>takeover bid</category><category>TakeoverBid</category><category>United Technologies</category><category>UnitedTechnologies</category><category>UTX</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Eliza Popescu]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 03 Mar 2008 11:25:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Just sold my Take-Two (TTWO) position]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/02/25/just-sold-my-take-two-ttwo-position/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/02/25/just-sold-my-take-two-ttwo-position/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/02/25/just-sold-my-take-two-ttwo-position/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/deals/" rel="tag">Deals</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/msft/" rel="tag">Microsoft (MSFT)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/yhoo/" rel="tag">Yahoo! (YHOO)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/erts/" rel="tag">Electronic Arts (ERTS)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/atvi/" rel="tag">Activision Inc (ATVI)</a></p><p>I decided to sell my position in <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/take-two-interactive-software-inc/ttwo/nas">Take-Two Interactive</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/take-two-interactive-software-inc/ttwo/nas">TTWO</a>) today. I obviously wanted to take advantage of the nice jump in the share price following the buzz over the <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/02/25/take-two-interactive-receives-takeover-offer-from-electronic-art/">all-cash offer</a> from <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/electronic-arts-inc/erts/nas">Electronic Arts</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/electronic-arts-inc/erts/nas">ERTS</a>). As I write this, Take-Two's stock is up 52% from its previous closing value, and up somewhere around 29% from the price I paid near the end of 2007 for the stubs that I just dumped.</p>
<p>My reasoning is simple. I purchased Take-Two ahead of the expected stock appreciation that would occur in the months preceding the <em>Grand Theft Auto IV </em>release in April. Also, I felt that the company was improving and moving beyond the problems it experienced with corporate governance issues in the recent past. Well, with the significant move in the value of my shares in a relatively short period of time, and with the uncertainty regarding this deal, I decided to take the money and see if the funds might be better invested elsewhere. I don't necessarily want to be in the middle of a takeover battle; I'm sure shareholders of <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/microsoft-corporation/msft/nas?tabs=quotesandnews">Microsoft</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/microsoft-corporation/msft/nas?tabs=quotesandnews">MSFT</a>) and <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/yahoo-inc/yhoo/nas?tabs=quotesandnews">Yahoo!</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/yahoo-inc/yhoo/nas?tabs=quotesandnews">YHOO</a>) aren't the most content investors on earth right now. </p>
<p>Do I think Take-Two might be able to negotiate a better offer? Yes, I do. But I own <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/activision-inc-new/atvi/nas?tabs=quotesandnews">Activision</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/activision-inc-new/atvi/nas?tabs=quotesandnews">ATVI</a>), and I am satisfied with playing the videogame sector via its shares for now. And I can always look at Take-Two after things settle. I believe selling Take-Two was the right decision for my portfolio. </p>
<p><em>Disclosure: I sold my entire position of Take-Two shortly before writing this, and I own shares in Activision. </em></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/02/25/just-sold-my-take-two-ttwo-position/">Just sold my Take-Two (TTWO) position</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 25 Feb 2008 13:35:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/02/25/take-two-interactive-receives-takeover-offer-from-electronic-art/>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/02/25/just-sold-my-take-two-ttwo-position/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1124043/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/02/25/just-sold-my-take-two-ttwo-position/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>atvi</category><category>Electronic Arts</category><category>ElectronicArts</category><category>erts</category><category>Grand Theft Auto</category><category>GrandTheftAuto</category><category>inthenews</category><category>Microsoft</category><category>msft</category><category>Take-Two Interactive</category><category>Take-twoInteractive</category><category>takeover bid</category><category>TakeoverBid</category><category>ttwo</category><category>Yahoo</category><category>yhoo</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Steven Mallas]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 25 Feb 2008 13:35:00 EST</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
