Brutal economic conditions unsurprisingly hit global accounting giant Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu this year.

The firm reports that revenue for fiscal 2009 (which ended May 31) fell 4.9% from the year before, settling at $26.1 billion. A decline in deal flow and the economic downturn around the world are cited as the primary reasons for the performance. Only the consulting business posted a gain. At the same time, Deloitte's workforce grew globally by 40,000 to 169,000, but the net increase masks a turbulent year for the employees.

As a Coca-Cola (NYSE: KO) shareholder, I was quite unnerved by recent talk centering on the issue of a soda tax. I'm sure PepsiCo (NYSE: PEP) shareholders were likewise frightened. According to Bloomberg, President Barack Obama is apparently open to the concept. In theory, funds generated from such a tax could be used to help defray the costs associated with a new health-care paradigm.

Besides raising money, what would be the justification behind such a governmental strategy? Well, excess sugar consumption can be dangerous. It can lead to all kinds of complications. You know the drill: obesity, diabetes, etc. When health issues like those rise, the cost of health care increases as well.

Three quarters of the fiscal year is comfortably behind us, and the U.S. budget deficit has already passed the $1 trillion mark. In June alone, the federal government spent faster than it earned to the tune of $94.3 billion. The result is below the median predicted by 30 estimates according to a Bloomberg News survey of economists -- projections ranged from $70 billion to $109.3 billion for the month. This is the first time we've had a June deficit since 1991.

In June 2008, the deficit for the month was a much more modest (but still sizeable) $33.5 billion. But last month spending spiked 37% to $309.7 billion, while revenue plunged 17% to $215.4 billion.

So how does the rest of the year look? Pretty grim.

The Wall Street Journal reports (subscription required) that General Motors (NYSE: GM) "could face an income-tax bill of as much as $7 billion that would be associated with a plan to give much of the company's outstanding stock to debtholders, the United Auto Workers union and the federal government."

GM is looking to the government for help in avoiding the tax burden and hopefully the Treasury Department and Congress will make it easy. Just tell GM that it doesn't have to pay any taxes on the restructuring. Hampering GM's efforts to restructure itself could actually harm the company's ability to repay the billions in loans that have already been extended.

First Solar (NASDAQ: FSLR - option chain) shares are rising today with other solar stocks after the US Senate approved a tax bill yesterday afternoon that extended $18 billion worth of tax credits to producers of alternative energy, including wind and solar power. If you think that the stock won't fall by too much in the coming months, then now could be a good time to look at a bullish hedged trade on FSLR.

FSLR opened this morning at $220.80. So far today the stock has hit a low of $218.02 and a high of $229.39. As of 12:45, FSLR is trading at $225.32, up $14.43 (6.8%). The chart for FSLR looks bullish and S&P gives FSLR a positive 4 STARS (out of 5) buy ranking.

For a bullish hedged play on this stock, I would consider an October bull-put credit spread below the $170 range. A bull-put credit spread is an options position that combines the purchase and sale of put options to hedge risk in case the stock doesn't do what you think but still leverage nice returns. For this particular trade, we will make a 7.5% return in just three weeks as long as FSLR is above $170 at October expiration. First Solar would have to fall by more than 24% before we would start to lose money. Learn more about this type of trade here.

In a tough economy, the income tax burden on individuals becomes more of a weight. Add the payments to higher gas prices, mortgages that are being reset at lofty levels and rising food costs and the results can be awful.

But at least corporations are paying income taxes to carry part of the burden of running the federal government, right? Too bad that it turns out that this assumption is wrong. As The New York Times writes, "Two out of every three United States corporations paid no federal income taxes from 1998 through 2005, according to a report released Tuesday by the Government Accountability Office, the investigative arm of Congress"

How sweet a deal is that?

Part of the trick is that many companies move money to countries outside the U.S. where the tax burden is lower.

In a period where the federal deficit is at nose bleed levels and individual tax payers are being crushed, Congress will probably be upset enough to pass bills to correct the inequity.

How the companies got away with it for so long is a question that is pretty disturbing.

Douglas A. McIntyre is an editor at 247wallst.com.

There's an old adage that you've got to give sometimes in order to receive. Nowhere is that more true than in modern-day politics where the level of candidate scrutinization had reached epic heights. While no politico myself, I do recognize a savvy move when I see one, and I think I just spotted one.

Obama just released his 2000-2006 tax returns into the public domain and is now urging Hillary Clinton to do the same. Why subject your filings to the public sphere? This armchair pundit believes that Obama knows something about the Clinton filings and is upping the ante to push them to the same level of disclosure.

But once we've got the filings, what do they tell us about Obama? Well, Bloomberg is taking the Obamas to task for not quite giving as charitably as they could. In an article out today, Bloomberg writes that the Obamas gave less than 1% of their 2000-2004 income to charity.

Just last week I reported about the insolvency problems in New Jersey to Walletpop readers, see: The snowball starts in New Jersey. Now, that nasty old snowball has streaked across the country and landed in the California suburb of Vallejo, wreaking havoc on the local government there. CNBC reports that Vallejo Councilwoman Stephanie Gomes states "Our financial situation is getting worse every single day". Ask not for whom the bell tolls, it tolls for the heavy handed labor unions which have coerced sweet pay and benefit packages for the 30% of our workforce which is supported via tax dollars produced by the rest of us who actually make things.

The insolvency of Vallejo should come as no big surprise, and in fact Vallejo is just the leader of what will become a very large pack. Before the end of this year I envision the entire state government of California will be in tears due to a lack of spending cash. You've been warned, it's to become a nationwide trend.

We just can't expect that private sector declines will leave the government sector untouched. The toughest part is that there's nothing government agencies can do about it, except to cut spending or raise taxes. Local governments are in the business of taking constructive dollars from the people who created them and then throwing them into the bottomless pit of entitlements, waste and graft. Now, the chickens have come home to roost, and they're big, mean, ugly chickens at that.

Wal-Mart (NYSE: WMT), like any company, never wastes a chance to reduce its tax footprint in every state it operates in. In North Carolina, though, the world's largest retailer recently had a beef with taxing authorities concerning rent deduction on its tax forms for locations in that state. Problem is, Wal-Mart had to pay about $33.5 million in taxes for rent it paid to its own Wal-Mart real estate units, then pay the taxes, and now, wants a refund.

A court said that it could not have a refund, and a legal beef ensued. Can Wal-Mart really take a deduction for rent on its own stores that have ownership by...Wal-Mart itself (though real estate holding units)? Another day, another tax loophole in corporate America.

The outcome here could set a precedent for other companies that pay rent to real-estate investment trust units that transfer tax-free income to their owners. In this case, the "owner" is Wal-Mart itself. According to The Wall Street Journal, Wal-Mart may have saved $230 million in state taxes over the last four years in many U.S. states where is operates store locations.

Every time May rolls around, if I'm expecting a tax return, I start to wonder: What if the IRS got my address wrong? What if this is the time my mailman drops the letter in the gutter by accident? What if my check gets lost?

Evidently, my paranoia isn't all just imagination; every year, tens of thousands of refund checks are returned to the IRS as undeliverable. Could one of them -- or several -- be yours? The IRS is looking for 115,478 taxpayers whose refund checks were returned to them by the postal service. The checks aren't tiny, either -- they total $110 million and average just under $1,000. Some taxpayers have several checks sitting in the IRS bank account, just waiting for the government to get updated address information from you.

Update your address and check on your refund status at this IRS page; or download form 8822 to ensure the IRS has your most recent digits.

There's a bit of tension in Pennsylvania regarding auction laws in that state and eBay Inc. (NASDAQ: EBAY). It seems that Pennsylvania law requires that eBay sellers should have auction permits and regulators there have chosen to begin enforcing the law. The situation is revealed in a blog post by Terrence O'Brien at Switched.com .

It's not surprising to me that this has come to the surface and I think it's symptomatic of what is to come. Internet taxation is a hot topic and various state authorities are jockeying for position. While the taxation of Internet access is a proposition which has been nearly put to rest for good, the taxation of Internet retail sales is still very much up for grabs. This assertion of law by Pennsylvania regulators is simply indicative of the state's desire to have a piece of the action. I believe it foretells of the stresses to come.

An AOL news poll shows that 83% of nearly 24,000 respondents feel that eBay sellers should not be required to have an auctioneers permit. That sentiment reverberates throughout the Internet. We should remember though, that sales made via the Internet often supplant sales that would otherwise be made through a brick and mortar retail outlet. I can assure you that state taxing authorities are weighing the effects of that change in dynamics carefully.

Should states lose sales tax revenue simply by virtue of a change in the sales venue? I don't think they'll stand for that. I still maintain my position that Internet sales tax solutions should be addressed from the Internet side of the equation rather than from the regulators side. We need a comprehensive solution on a national scale before the individual states come in and make eBay into a serious mess.

Let's see a show of hands, who has their 501(c)(3) corporations all picked out for tax time?

It's not that I advocate using the act of charity to manipulate your tax burden, but you must admit that when it comes to paying taxes, if a donation of a couple hundred dollars will drop you into a lower tax bracket at filing time, a check to Habitat for Humanity suddenly becomes much more palatable.

The designation of 501(c)(3) is the code which identifies IRS registered, non-profit organizations. That's the first thing you want to look for when considering a charitable donation. There are (and should be) a host of other questions that you need to ask when donating, but where are the answers?

While investigating the Kiplinger.com web site, I discovered an absolutely excellent source of charitable organization analysis tucked in with Kiplinger's 25 Best Web Sites review. Charity Navigator.org is a website dedicated to the nuts-and-bolts financial disclosure of non-profit corporations large and small. Charity Navigator reveals how charities are handling the donations they receive and gives a broad view about how a charity is performing on the books. With a free and easy registration to the site, you can also have access to deeper analysis on specific organizations, such as a retrospective analysis of an organization's historical performance.

The experts say that when considering non-profit organizations to make donations to, you should always be careful and do your homework. Try to make sure that the organizations you choose to support serve your principles and ideals. You might find value by spending a little time at Charity Navigator to compare how charities stack up in their performance and while you're there, be sure to read their Top 10 Practices of Savvy Donors.

Cisco Systems (NASDAQ: CSCO), the powerhouse maker of computer-networking equipment, fired an executive charged by Brazilian federal authorities in a tax-evasion probe at the company.

Last month, Cisco said Brazilian authorities raided its offices in Sao Paulo and Rio de Janeiro and seized documents and detained employees. From the sound of what was going on, it seems like there was a complicated fraud scheme being perp'd out of Brazil that benefited Cisco, its Brazilian unit, and a vendor in the country.

How big is this issue? Hard to tell at this point. What we do know is what the Brazilian authorities are alleging. Authorities there claim that the U.S. company evaded 1.5 billion reais ($832 million) in taxes.

The tax hit is relatively small compared to Cisco's $170 billion market cap. The company has a strong balance sheet and this shouldn't be particularly serious, even if the firm had to pay the entire alleged amount. Meanwhile, Brazil has tripled its police staff in a major crackdown against white-collar crime.

What remains to be seen is how big a deal this is for Cisco's entire Brazilian operation, and whether this affects sales and growth going forward. I'm interested to see how well the company communicated their exposure to investors.

Zack Miller is the Managing Editor of IsraelNewsletter.com and a former equity analyst for a leading multinational hedge fund. Author's fund doesn't hold a position in CSCO.

A group of minority and business leaders including former basketball star Earvin "Magic" Johnson plans to form a group called the Access to Capital Coalition to fight against efforts in Congress to end the tax advantages enjoyed by the hedge fund and private equity industry, according to the Wall Street Journal (subscription required).

"Members of the new coalition argue that increasing the taxes on carried interest, also known as the carry, would reduce the incentives for private-equity funds to invest and would make it harder to recruit top talent, particularly for small and midsize funds," the paper said. "Many of the new coalition's members run smaller funds that focus on investing in low- and moderate-income areas."

The U.S. Chamber of Commerce released a study today detailing the damage that these proposals could cause the economy, according to Reuters.

So, making hedge fund and private equity billionaires pay their fair share of taxes would somehow hurt poor people. I don't believe it and I doubt this coalition will do much to sway members of Congress. This issue isn't about taxation, it's about fairness.

Instead of paying the ordinary tax rates of 35 percent, these private equity and hedge fund managers pay the 15-percent capital gains rate on their carried interest. It's tough for most Americans to understand why one group of very rich people pays much lower taxes than another group of rich people. There is no political upside for any member of Congress to stick up for the industry, particularly as the presidential contest kicks into high gear.

There seems to be broad bipartisan support in Congress to close this loophole. It's not a question of if the industry pays higher taxes but when and how much.

UST (NYSE: UST) volatility Flat; UST down 6%; Altria Group (NYSE: MO) testing Marlboro Moist Smokeless tobacco. UST, a leading producer and marketer of moist smokeless tobacco products (Skoal, Copenhagen), is recently down $3.06 to $48.91. MO announced the introduction of Marlboro Moist Smokeless tobacco into test market. MO had been frequently mentioned as possibly interested in UST. UST has a market cap of $7.7 billion with quarterly March 2007 total revenue of $447 million. UST September option implied volatility of 26 is near its 26-week average of 23 according to Track Data, suggesting non-directional price risk.

Forest Labs (NYSE: FRX) volatility Elevated on patent challenge Appeal. FRX, a U.S. based pharmaceutical company, is recently down .48 to $37.74. FRX's Lexapro, an antidepressant accounting for 66% of FRX total revenue, is facing a patent challenge appeal.Buckingham Research says "LXP patent challenge appeal which we would expect to be resolved from an appellate decision over the next few months (we expect FRX to prevail in this case)." FRX call option volume of 9,195 contracts compares to put volume of 4,571 contracts. FRX September option implied volatility of 70 is above its 26-week average of 33 according to Track Data, suggesting larger price risks.

Daily options Update is provided by Stock Specialist Paul Foster of theflyonthewall.com.