Rumor has it that Nortel Networks (OTC: NRTLQ) will sell its enterprise division in the near future.

This would be part of a broader plan to break the company apart instead of trying to restructure its way out of bankruptcy. The company is planning to sell its CDMA and LTE wireless businesses to Nokia (NYSE: NOK) for $650 million -- the first unit sale since the January bankruptcy filing.

"The Obama administration is poised to spend a lot of money on infrastructure; one important sector is the the nation's electric power grid and the communications system," notes growth stock advisor Dave Dyer.

In his Dave Dayer's Newsletter, he explains, "Some products will win big, others will get nothing, but one company will get more business regardless of which products win: Quanta Services (NYSE: PWR), the leading electrical contractor in the country.

"Quanta's service business stands ready to expand with the infrastructure buildout no matter which products are selected.

"They do design, installation, maintenance, and repair on just about any type of network infrastructure (electric power, telecom, broadband cable, and gas pipelines.) Their moat against competitors is size. They are the largest in their field and that is in no danger of changing.

I have stated numerous times that in our system of capitalism, killing a company is almost impossible to do. It just doesn't happen very often, especially with older companies with deep roots.

Years of losses, shrinking markets, and a failed business strategy matter little. If there is a will, there is a way. Until the credit crisis in November, there was always a way to raise needed capital to keep the dream alive.

A great example of this is Nortel Networks Corporation (NYSE: NT). The giant telecommunication networking firm was a darling for investors during the dot-com boom. In early 2000, the stock peaked at close to $1,000 per share on a split adjusted basis.

As the crash unfolded, NT collapsed. By the end of 2002, NT was a stock on life support and trading for pennies a share (pre split). At the time, the company was bleeding cash and facing an entirely different market for its products and services.

Nortel Networks Inc. (NYSE: NT), which has been floundering for years, put itself out of its misery today by filing for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection.

According to court papers filed in U.S. Bankruptcy Court in Delaware, the Canadian telecom equipment maker owes bondholders $3.8 billion and was facing $107 million in interest payments this week. The company already was facing de-listing from the New York Stock Exchange. It has a $2.4 billion cash position.

Amidst all of the usual hopeful spin in the company's press release was this telling sentence: "The company commenced a process to turn around and transform Nortel in late 2005, and the company made important progress on a number of fronts."

That's right folks, Nortel has been in a turnaround since 2005. Then again, Nortel is not a typical company. Former Chief Executive Michael Dunn, former Chief Financial Officer Douglas Beatty and former Controller Michael Gollolgy are facing charges in Canada for manipulating earnings in the early part of the decade. Shares of Nortel hit $900 on a split-adjusted basis in 2000.

"Investors have been focusing on the shortcomings at Qwest Communications International (NYSE: Q), and to be sure, it has plenty," observes turnaround specialist George Putnam.

In his The Turnaround Letter, he adds, "But the company also has very valuable assets and strong cash flow. In addition, we believe the stock would command a good premium in a takeover." Here's his bullish review.

"Following its IPO in 1995, Qwest expanded via acquisitions and partnerships, and participated in the telecom bubble of the late 1990's.

"Unlike many of the other high-flying telecoms of that era, however, Qwest realized that in addition to a story you needed customers. In 2000, it went out and acquired US West, which gave Qwest the revenue base to survive the bursting of the telecom bubble

"Although the company survived, the shareholders have had a rocky ride during the current decade. The stock peaked around 60 in 2000, dropped to just above 1 in 2002, rebounded to 10 in 2007 and then declined to its present level.

"Management's challenge is too maximize the value of its assets. One of Qwest's greatest assets, and biggest challenges, is its huge traditional landline telephone business. The landline business is in a slow but steady decline as customers move to wireless or Internet telephony.

Sprint Nextel Corp. (NYSE: S), the national wireless carrier that can't stop hemorrhaging customers quarter after quarter, may close up to 20 of its customer call centers starting in 2009 as it moves to aggressively cuts costs.

Sprint Chief Service Officer Bob Johnson said the cuts were caused by declining customer calls and fewer billing and service questions. This makes sense: Sprint Nextel has lost millions of customers in the last 18 months. It seems pretty natural to not need all those call center representatives if the call volume is dropping.

But that's not all. Not enough Spring employees have signed up for recently-announced buyout packages, which is forcing Sprint Nextel's hand at more layoffs beyond the 4,000 employees pink slips it gave at the start of this year. Sprint Nextel has improved its customer service -- which was the bane of its existence -- but those improvements came as the U.S. economy took a nosedive and competitor AT&T, Inc. (NYSE: T) sold the heck out of the iPhone 3G at Sprint's expense.

The only thing Sprint can do is to become a leader in something, and customer service would be a great area to really make a difference in. Wireless has been and still is a commodity service, even with calling plans, coverage and data speeds being slightly different between all national carriers. The one thing that could be a big differentiator is customer service. Trying to get corporations to hear that call seems like a futile exercise in most cases, which is unfortunate.

This post is part of a feature in which we wonder whatever happened to some notorious financial figures. See the other 17.

As Wall Street implodes around us, the word "hubris" is getting tossed around quite a bit. Hubris -- also known as excessive, overweening pride -- has become the catchall explanation for most of the market's ills. Our financial system has gone up in flames, we're told, simply because so many CEOs and regulators thought they were too smart to fail, no matter how highly leveraged their subprime mortgage portfolios may have been.

Assuming this is true, let's call Joseph Nacchio a trendsetter. As the chief executive of Qwest Communications International (NYSE: Q), Nacchio was determined to construct the world's biggest, best, and most totally awesome fiber-optic network. (Mind you, this was back in the late '90s, when the telecom bubble was just a glimmer in the market's eye.) However, the plucky CEO was driven not by a personal commitment to excellence, but rather by spite.

Nacchio left his old job at AT&T (NYSE: T) because he wasn't granted a plum promotion to president, which he felt he so richly deserved. What better way to show up his former employer than to build a superior network and steal away market share?

Unfortunately, Nacchio's impure motivations were not the best recipe for success. To give you some idea as to how his plans for world telecom domination played out, check out this blog entry I wrote about Qwest and Joseph Nacchio as part of our series on the worst S&P 500 stocks of the past 25 years.

Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson (ADR) (NASDAQ: ERIC), a telecom-related business whose colleagues include Alcatel-Lucent (NYSE: ALU) and Cisco Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CSCO), reported earnings for the third quarter. And, unless I miss my guess, the market liked what it saw. As I write this, shares are up over 15%, and the trading volume is high. So, what's going on here?

Well, according to this source, revenue and profit for the quarter went beyond the expectations of analysts. The top line soared 13%. Nothing wrong with that. The bottom line, however, went down 28%, even though it exceeded what was expected. And then there was the gross margin improvement. A lot of times that can work wonders for a company's shares. Gross margin went from 35.6% to 37%. Wall Street was impressed.

Now, this is all well and good, but am I a buyer of Ericsson after the report? No. There are a few things to consider here. First, the global economy is a mess. Second, statements made by management in terms of the near future indicate a cautious stance. Third, there's no way I'm buying a stock that just rallied by a double-digit percentage in this market. Especially not a tech stock. There are harder ways to lose money. The 52-week low on the ADR's is about $6 per share, and I can easily see this one revisiting that level as we continue to get news on the economy throughout the quarter. Obviously, many investors out there disagree with me. But this is not the time to play momentum trader, in my opinion. I'm happy to sit on the sidelines in this case, even if I turn out to be wrong.

Disclosure: I don't own any company mentioned; positions can change without notice.

On a day when many telecom stocks were hit with downgrades, China Mobile Limited (NYSE: CHL) distinguished itself this morning by scoring an upgrade. Goldman Sachs raised its rating on CHL from "sell" to "neutral," while simultaneously trimming the stock's price target from HK$95 to HK$90. The price-target cut echoes a similar move made by Citigroup on Sunday; the brokerage firm cut its target on CHL from HK$120 to HK$100.

In response to today's mixed analyst comment, CHL is down more than 7% at midday. The equity has shed about 42% year-to-date, and its lengthy decline could prompt additional price-target cuts during the short term. According to Thomson Financial, China Mobile shares are trading about 60% south of their average 12-month price target of USD $81.01.

Today's upgrade from Goldman comes as CHL is approaching former support at the $44 level. This region buoyed the stock in early 2007 and earlier this month, which suggests that it could once again provide a floor for the shares. Unfortunately, though, the stock is also looking up at stiff technical resistance from its 10-week moving average, which means China Mobile might find itself bouncing sideways in the weeks to come. Or -- even more troubling -- a continued drop in the share price could spark an unwinding of widespread optimistic sentiment.

"Apple (NASDAQ: AAPL) and Research in Motion (NASDAQ: RIMM) are taking the smartphone market by storm," says Toby Smith in his ChangeWave Investing.

"AAPL and RIMM are both pushing all of the other manufactures to the sidelines. It's clear that RIMM's BlackBerry is the dominating force in the corporate smartphone market, but the Apple iPhone has shaken things up quite a bit on the consumer side.

"The combination of the new Apple model flying off the shelves, and rumors of a postponement for one of RIMM's new releases, has raised questions among some analysts as to RIMM's ability to fight back.

"Research in Motion may be planning to release several new smartphones this year, including the KickStart, the Thunder and the already announced Bold.

3Com Corp. (NASDAQ: COMS) shares are up around 12% so far today after the network equipment maker raised its first-quarter sales and profit forecasts due to gains in China. Not only did 3Com raised guidance, it also raised it above analyst estimates.

3Com, which makes routers, switches and cables for telephone companies, has more than quadrupled sales in China since buying out Huawei's stake in their joint venture H3C last year. China now accounts for almost half the sales at 3Com.

Some may be concerned due to recent reports of China's slower economic growth. But two things are worth mentioning here. First, China's slower GDP growth is still a whopping 9%, down from 11%. And second, telecom infrastructure will likely continue at the same pace.

It isn't surprising, then, that 3Com has raised guidance for both sales and earnings. Specifically, 3Com expects sales in China to be 10% higher than in the previous quarter on stronger sales to Huawei.

In this series, we take a look at the 25 stocks on the S&P 500 Index (SPX) that have turned in the worst performance during the past decade -- what went wrong, and what happens next.

Among telecom stocks that got smacked during the past decade, Ciena Corporation (NASDAQ: CIEN) took the hardest hit -- at least, among those companies that still exist in the same incarnation. Yes, that comment was directed at you, Alcatel-Lucent (NYSE: ALU).

Other telecom losers on our roster include Qwest Communications (NYSE: Q), JDS Uniphase (NASDAQ: JDSU), and Tellabs, Inc. (NASDAQ: TLAB) -- the latter of which also plays a key role in the forthcoming Ciena saga.

What went wrong? At number 3 on our list of SPX laggards, CIEN lost 90% of its value in the decade that ended June 30, 2008. The stock peaked at a split-adjusted $1,057 in October 2000, a zenith that marked the top of a steep ascent. The equity's ensuing plunge would be just as dramatic.

In this series, we take a look at the 25 stocks on the S&P 500 Index (SPX) that have turned in the worst performance during the past decade -- what went wrong, and what happens next.

Add Tellabs, Inc. (NASDAQ: TLAB) to the list of casualties from the Great Telecom Bust of the new millennium. It was a bloody massacre that highlighted the difficulties of forecasting; and, in particular, the danger of forecasting through the distorted lens of the dot-com bubble. When Internet traffic stopped multiplying at its previously exponential rate, the market was faced with a glut of supply and waning demand. Only the strong survived, but even they couldn't manage to thrive.

What went wrong? At No. 5 on our list of SPX underperformers, TLAB lost 87% of its value during the decade that ended June 30, 2008. The stock peaked at $77.25 in November 1999 before its momentum shifted.

In 1999, Tellabs was on an acquisition binge. A planned buyout of Ciena Corporation (NASDAQ: CIEN) had hit the skids, and the company made up for the loss by absorbing a series of smaller players -- within months, Tellabs told investors it would buy Alcatel's DSC Communications unit, Netcore Systems, and Salix Technologies.

In this series, we take a look at the 25 stocks on the S&P 500 Index (SPX) that have turned in the worst performance during the past decade -- what went wrong, and what happens next.

Permit me, if you will, to draw up an analogy: Qwest Communications (NYSE: Q) is to Wall Street as Lindsay Lohan is to Hollywood. At first, the little redheaded upstart seems to come out of nowhere, and dazzles everyone with her amazing performance. Then, just as quickly as the newcomer rose to fame, she sinks into a massive meltdown, the scope and severity of which is shocking even to seasoned vets. Okay, so this little comparison probably won't find its way onto the SATs, but -- minus the "redheaded" part -- the similarities are kind of eerie.

What went wrong? At lucky number 13 on our list of SPX underperformers, Q shed 77% of its value during the decade that ended on June 30, 2008. The shares peaked at $66 in March 2000, and bottomed out at $1.02 in August 2002 - a 98.5% plunge, top to bottom.

When Colorado-based Qwest burst onto the Big Board in June 1997, it was a company with a vendetta. CEO Joseph Nacchio defected from his executive position at AT&T (NYSE: T) after it became clear that Ma Bell didn't see him as president material. Qwest was in the process of building a massive fiber-optic network, and the upstart was determined to grab market share away from the industry's old giants -- including AT&T, naturally.

Verizon Communications Inc. (NYSE: VZ) today reported better-than-expected second quarter results, fueled by growth in its wireless and FioS TV and Internet customers.

Net income rose 12% to $1.88 billion, or 66 cents a share, from $1.68 billion, or 58 cents, a year earlier, according to the New York-based company. Sales rose 3.7% to $24.1 billion. Excluding one-time costs, profit was 67 cents, two cents ahead of the 65-cents expected by analysts surveyed by Bloomberg News. Sales were slightly below the $24.2 billion Bloomberg estimate.

"Our second quarter results were on track with our business plan, and top- and bottom-line growth remained solid," said Chief Executive Officer Ivan Seidenberg in the earnings press release. "We remain focused on steady improvements in revenue growth and productivity that will increase profitability and cash flows and create future opportunities to enhance shareholder returns."

Among the highlights:

• 1.5 million net customer additions for the wireless business;
• Wireless churn of 1.12%, 0.83% retail post-paid churn;
• 11.8 percent increase in total revenues; data revenues up 45.3%
• 176,000 net new FiOS TV customers and 187,000 net new FiOS Internet customers

Going forward, it will be interesting to see if consumers, who are already stretched thin, begin holding off on ordering FiOS even if the service is superior to cable. Also, will stressed consumers quit the service because they are worried about more pressing needs like their mortgage?