Yahoo! Inc. (NASDAQ: YHOO) had just finished a webcast discussing the resignation of Terry Semel from the CEO role and the appointment of Jerry Yang to that role. Sue Decker was appointed president. I, for one, found the webcast to be quite dull and most uninspiring.

Not that I expected discussion of Semel's inflated compensation package during times Yahoo! struggled, but there was hardly any meat attached to the bare-bones news. Yes, each gushed over the other two in his or her turn, and each gave the appropriate ra-ra-ra speech of how Yahoo! will not only be a great competitor, but a winner too. Despite all that, they didn't instill much confidence in me, not about the future of Yahoo! and not about their ability to change it. Maybe the reason is that there wasn't much of a change. Semel will remain as chairman, albeit in a non-executive role, and the other two, Decker and Yang -- names we've known for quite some time -- will be promoted. Perhaps looking outside of Yahoo! for the CEO, as Anthony Noto of Goldman Sachs suggested, would have been the better alternative. At least some fresh ideas and viewpoints would have been brought in.

There were several questions about capex, but Jerry and Sue gave no news of acquisitions or impending partnerships or inclinations to do either. There was talk of challenges, especially slower growth in display advertising, and allusion to Google's dominance. Even as Jerry said Panama was performing beyond their expectations and Yahoo! may outperform in Q2, revenue is seen in the lower half of the previous outlook.

If I were Susan Decker, I'd be rollicked with mixed emotions. On one hand, the long-awaited exit of Terry Semel as Yahoo! Inc. (NASDAQ: YHOO) CEO gives Sue a lot of room to get on with her company's renovation. She's often been seen as Yahoo!'s strongest leader and most talented executive; Semel's resignation really makes the company hers in a way it never could be before. In December, her promotion to Executive Vice President, Head of Advertiser and Publisher Group made her the heir apparent. And she's been named President, surely a lovely title reminiscent of ultimate power.

But on the other hand, this is a corporation, and the real power is in the position of Chief Executive Officer -- the job we all know she should (if she has half the ambition she seems) truly desire. Not only that, but the rest of the world agrees she's the best candidate for the position. This perfect opportunity to give her the title for which her career has been grooming her? It's been passed over, and we all have to wonder: what were they thinking? and, will she ever be the bride? and, if you were her, wouldn't you be updating your profile on HotJobs about now?

Every deep discussion of the Semel resignation contains the same perplexed question. Various answers to the why not Sue? conundrum include "because she's not an outsider" and "I just don't know." Could it be because she doesn't have the coding geek background? Because she's a woman? Or is the board really (as many suggest, but I don't buy) just biding their time until ... something ... to name her CEO?

Come on. If Susan was going to be named CEO, now would be the time. Why put off any longer? If the board really was happy with her in the role, the job would be hers, effective immediately. Last time they reorganized the entire company to give her a new-and-improved title. This one, to me, says "you know honey, maybe you're just not CEO material." What do you think?

Yahoo Inc. (NASDAQ; YHOO), which today replaced Terry Semel as chief executive with co-founder Jerry Yang, may be dragged into the battle royale for Dow Jones & Co. (NYSE: DJ).

Billionaire Ron Burkle, who the unions have enlisted to save them from the evil clutches of News Corp (NYSE:NWS) Chief Executive Rupert Murdoch, is trying to convinced the Internet giant to join him in a bid for the owner of the Wall Street Journal, according to Fortune.

Why the unions think the Burkle is a such a good guy is a little baffling. The supermarket mogul won't get many Christmas cards from shareholders since, as a member of Yahoo's compensation committee, he helped Semel get his outrageous $70 million pay package.

Yahoo should tell Burkle to take a hike. The company's whole strategy has been based on the fact that it DOESN'T NEED TO OWN CONTENT. Executives have made this point to me in person. They've made this point to other journalists. They've made this point to Wall Street analysts. Most importantly, though, Yahoo has made this point to content providers who are nervous about the small amount of original content that the company does produce.

Joining the bidding war for Dow Jones makes no sense for Yahoo. The company has plenty of problems of its own, including how to diplomatically shove Semel out of the door. The theory is that he can do less damage as chairman, until he's given the chance to make a graceful exit, while Jerry Yang gets his feet wet as chief executive.

Susan Decker, who gained kudos on Wall Street during her tenure as CFO, would have made a better choice. She has become president and it wouldn't surprise me if she eventually left the company as well.

Yang has a tough road ahead to convince both Internet users and investors enamored of Google Inc. (NASDAQ: GOOG) that Yahoo still is relevant.

Finally, Yahoo! Inc. (NASDAQ: YHOO) has ditched its CEO Terry Semel, according to MarketWatch. And the new CEO is Jerry Yang, a co-founder of the company. Former CFO, Susan Decker was named president, positioning her for a chance to take over the top slot.

It is beyond me why Semel held onto his job for so long. He helped stabilize Yahoo after the dot-com crash but has stumbled from one incompetent quarter to the next for years. And he has taken home some truly outrageous pay -- a total of $452 million in salary, bonus and stock-option exercises since April 2001 [subscription] -- during which time Yahoo stock has risen four-fold.

However, in the last year the disconnect between Semel's pay and Yahoo's performance became too much to take. According to the New York Times, his total 2006 pay was $107.5 million during which time Yahoo's stock fell 35%. And directors concluded Yahoo was just not catching up fast enough with Google, Inc. (NASDAQ: GOOG) so Semel had to go.

Susan Decker had been positioned to take over the company as CEO. But Yahoo's board probably decided that she was not yet ready. However, she is considered to have the inside track during the CEO search to replace Semel. So Yang's appointment could be just a temporary move that will help stabilize the company until she is ready.

Or, with the stock up 8% to $29.62 in after-hours trading, he might just sell it. It would make a nice morsel for Microsoft Corporation (NASDAQ: MSFT).

Peter Cohan is president of Peter S. Cohan & Associates, a management consulting and venture capital firm. He also teaches management at Babson College and edits The Cohan Letter. He has no financial interest in the securities mentioned in this post.

[See our live blog of the web cast in which Terry Semel discusses his resignation here.]

Okay, so we all know by now that Yahoo! Inc. (NASDAQ: YHOO) CEO Terry Semel has resigned. Co-founder Jerry Yang will become CEO and Sue Decker the President. The call has just started, please refresh.

4:50: Jerry Yang is speaking. Terry, Jerry and Sue will first discuss the management changes, then give a brief business update. Wonder what that would be.

Terry started talking. In his slow drawl he says how proud he was working at Yahoo! and with Sue and Jerry (sure, what else he would say!).

Now he explains why now. He wanted to leave sooner rather than later and this way he ensures a smooth transition.

Now he says how Yahoo! had a difficult and challenging year. Is it me, or does his voice wavered a little?

Speaking of Jerry, Terry says Jerry brings phenomenal skills (he has a hard time speaking, I think).

Now he says how Sue has deserved this promotion. Her financial skills.

Jerry and Sue will be an unbeatable team and it is the right time to do it.

How long can you perform so inexpertly at your job that all of Wall Street calls for your firing, and still keep hangin' on? Evidently Terry Semel reached the end of his mental rope as of June 17, 2007. Yahoo! Inc. (NASDAQ: YHOO) just announced Semel was resigning effective immediately. Yahoo! co-founder Jerry Yang will take over as CEO.

Interestingly, Semel won't be getting a separation agreement (read: no money), as he's resigning voluntarily. I wonder whose decision that really was?

A webcast discussing the resignation will be starting in five minutes, at 4:45 Eastern time. Melly Alazraki is live blogging the announcement.

Other BloggingStocks coverage:
Brian White: Even with Semel out, Yahoo! still can't catch Google
Georges Yared: Google is the reason Terry Semel just couldn't win
Peter Cohan: What took so long -- and, with YHOO up sharply since announcement, will Jerry Yang sell?
Gary Sattler: Was Terry Semel really that bad? Ummm, yes.
Melly Alazraki: Webcast uninspiring; I was hoping for new talent from the outside.
Julie Tilsner: Yahoo! disorganized; I'm glad I didn't end up as a Yahoo!
Jonathan Berr: Yahoo! needs fixing; it should avoid bidding for Dow Jones. And will Susan Decker now quit?
May 3, 2007: $40 million in 2006 too much for Semel
December 2007: Yahoo! reorganization annoints Decker; you call this a reorganization? Terry Semel should be fired.

Word on the Street is that Yahoo! Inc (NASDAQ: YHOO) CEO Terry Semel is considering resigning from the Internet giant. Rumors are swirling that if Semel resigns, potentially within the next six months, co-founder Jerry Yang will take his place as CEO and Sue Decker will become the company's president.

Last week, the Associated Press reported that angry shareholders have been looking to oust Semel for some time. One shareholder, the article noted, said he believes the company "is drifting" and "its problems ultimately lie at Terry's feet. The feeling among shareholders is widespread." The fact that rival Google Inc (NASDAQ: GOOG) has seen its shares increase nearly six-fold since going public, while Yahoo!'s stock fell 4%, has had shareholders calling for Semel's head on a plate; Google's stock has risen about 30% over the past year, while Yahoo!'s is down 10%.

Shareholders believe that Yahoo!'s younger rival is dominant in the search advertising field, partly because of its acquisitions of DoubleClick and YouTube, while Yahoo! is contending with the resignation of CTO Farzad Nazem (Jerry Yang is serving as the company's interim CTO).

Then there's the issue of Panama, which some claim to be a "Google-wannabe." Back in January, the Wall Street Journal reported some users saying that an upgrade to the online-ad system is a "hassle." Currently, Yahoo! trails behind both Google and Microsoft Corporation (NASDAQ: MSFT) in the ad-search field, and with many disappointed in Panama, investors can only hope that a new CEO, someone with "fresh eyes," would be able to make an acquisition -- online advertising company ValueClick Inc (NASDAQ: VCLK), perhaps? -- to fill in the gap.

Let's say Semel resigned and Yang took his place. Many analysts feel that this would be a positive move for the company; RBC Capital, for one, believes that shares of Yahoo! could go up $1-$2 should Semel resign. Under new management, the firm said, the company could be open to new ideas that Semel had previously rejected.

While there has been speculation the company would be put up for sale under the direction of Semel, perhaps an intense restructuring under a new leader would be what the company needs to get back on track.

Yahoo! (NASDAQ: YHOO) implied volatility flat into EPS and unconfirmed chatter. YHOO is recently trading up $0.55 to $27.85. YHOO is expected to report EPS on 7/17. YHOO is frequently mentioned as a merger candidate with Microsoft (NASDAQ: MSFT) and upper level management changes. Unconfirmed chatter is circulating this morning that CEO Terry Semel may resign. YHOO option implied volatility of 34 is near its 26-week average according to Track Data, suggesting flat risk.

BEA Systems (NASDAQ: BEAS) volatility and July call volume elevated on renewed chatter. BEAS, a leading supplier of middleware software, is recently up 15 cents to $13.28. Unconfirmed chatter is circulating that Hewlett-Packard (NYSE: HPQ) having an interest in BEAS for $18.50 a share. ORCL and IBM have been frequently mentioned as interested in BEAS. BEAS will be at NXTcomm this week, a global forum of information, communications, entertainment and technology companies. BEAS July option implied volatility of 43 is above its 26-week average of 36 according to Track Data, suggesting larger risk.

Option volume leaders today are: Yahoo (NASDAQ: YHOO), Symantec (NASDAQ: SYMC) and Apple (NASDAQ: AAPL).

Daily Option Update is provided by Stock Options Specialist Paul Foster of theflyonthewall.com.

Yahoo Inc (NASDAQ: YHOO) shareholders sent a symbolic message yesterday about the heft of Chief Executive Terry Semel's $71.7 million paycheck, which was more than double that of any other Silicon Valley CEO last year, according to the San Jose Mercury News.

Three top advisory firms have been urging institutional shareholders to vote against three members of Yahoo's compensation committee, one-third of the investors voted against the slate of directors at the annual meeting, up significantly from 2005, when nearly one-fifth of the investors withheld their votes for directors after a similar campaign.

About one-third of investors also backed a union pension fund's proposal to tie pay more closely to performance.

Reacting in part to shareholder discontent, Yahoo's board approved a controversial package in May 2006 that slashed Semel's salary from $600,000 to $1 but awarded him 6 million options to carry him through a three-year period. Those options were valued at more than $71 million.

Semel has cashed in a total of $446 million in gains since taking charge in 2001. During this time, Google Inc (NASDAQ: GOOG) has come to dominate many aspects of Internet searching and advertising.

Meanwhile, investors continue to look for any signs of success from Project Panama.

Yahoo!'s (NASDAQ: YHOO) annual meeting is likely to be a battleground this year, with shareholder angst over CEO Terry Semel's $39.8 million dollar pay package in 2006. Institutional Shareholder Services is advising that shareholders withhold their votes from the three members of the company's compensation committee up for re-election, and the United Brotherhood of Carpenters Pension Fund will be asking shareholders to consider a proposal that would require that performance bonuses only be paid when the company has performed well.

What a novel concept. Next thing ya know schools will only be giving A's to students who do their homework.

Yahoo shareholders have a lot to complain about. The chart to the right shows how poor the stock's performance has been over the past three years. What will be the outcome of all the hand-wringing and complaining at the annual meeting? Most likely nothing. But it's always fun to follow annual meetings with righteously indignant shareholders, and the webcast may be worth tuning into today at 1:00 pm ET.

For some interesting stories of annual meetings and corporate governance inaction in action, check out A Weekend With Warren Buffett and Other Shareholder Meeting Adventures.

Today, Yahoo! (NASDAQ: YHOO) will have its annual shareholders meeting and CEO Terry Semel's compensation will likely be an issue.

Yahoo!'s glory has been getting trounced on lately, even as the company apparently sees good results from its recent launch of Project Panama. Project Panama, the company's new advertising system, intended to compete with Google (NASDAQ: GOOG), is still not getting any kind of good press. Meanwhile, Google expands its leading position and the internet media darling keeps anything and everything Yahoo! out of the limelight. That is, until it comes to the compensation of Yahoo!'s CEO, Terry Semel. He's getting paid way too handsomely for what many consider lackluster performance. And, it's only going to get worse before it gets any better.

YHOO shares have languished around the $30 level for some time now, and things are just not falling Yahoo!'s way, especially when it comes to competing with Google and a newly-resurgent Microsoft as well. Add to that CEO Terry Semel's brash claims three years ago that Yahoo! would remain the internet's brightest star along with Semel's recent pay and it's not hard to see why the CEO is in the hot seat.

Will 2007 see the end of Semel as Yahoo!'s illustrious leader? In all estimations, it will. Yahoo! has lost its shine this year as Google has completely eclipsed it, and the company's "wandering" status -- even as it continues to make a decent pile of cash each quarter -- is not sitting well with shareholders who see Yahoo! as a laggard while other companies race past it. If Semel does go this year, there will be two responsible people: Google co-founders Larry Page and Sergey Brin.

Two proxy consulting firms, Proxy Governance Inc. and Institutional Shareholder Services, said that Yahoo! (NASDAQ: YHOO) shareholders should withhold support for members of the company's compensation committee. They reason that Terry Semel was paid too much. By their calculations, which includes stock grants and bonuses, Semel made $107.5 million. Nice work, if you can find it.

Based on studies of "peer group" companies, which would include Microsoft (NASDAQ: MSFT) and Google (NASDAQ: GOOG), Semel's pay is 926% above the mean compensation.

Mr. Semel has already proven that he can be ham-handed with Wall Street. He was enthusiastic about first half 2007 earnings. The first quarter was poor and forecasts for the second were disappointing. The only action keeping the stock up would appear to be rumors of a bid for the company from Microsoft.

Semel has also missed out on the chance to buy DoubleClick and Feedburner, two companies that could have added to Yahoo!'s marketing arsenal. Google ending up the winner in bidding for both companies.

Yahoo!'s net income in the first quarter was $124 million, almost as much as Mr. Semel made in the previous year.

Douglas A. McIntyre is a partner at 24/7 Wall St.

Jim Cramer proposing on CNBC's Mad Money that Yahoo! (NASDAQ: YHOO) and eBay (NASDAQ: EBAY) should get together and merge. He is calling for this because the growth is slowing for both companies, and a merger could jump start it. Cramer contends that companies with slower growth have to do something to get their sizzle back. Cramer said that Microsoft (NASDAQ: MSFT) was reportedly in talks to buy Yahoo! and that the aQuantive (NASDAQ: AQNT) buyout signals it is willing to do deals. If these companies had better areas to invest in they wouldn't be propping shares up with buybacks. A merger would allow Yahoo!'s massive users to use Skype and PayPal to buy goods. Cramer thinks this would bring back growth, and would finally get Semel out of Yahoo!

This is just after Yahoo!'s chief technology officer bailed out of the company today. As Cramer is long Yahoo! in his charitable trust and as he's been touting ideas for something like this, this "call to merge" is hardly a surprise to me or to others. The market caps are very similar, although eBay is the larger company. You should know that if you are playing these stocks based only on Cramer's comments, then know that you are buying what is probably his third or fourth round of recommendations calling for this. This is the first time he made an entire segment on this would-be merger, but this is best defined as "re-information."

Jon Ogg can be reached at jonogg@247wallst.com; he does not own securities in the companies he covers.

Yahoo! Inc. (NASDAQ: YHOO) is an internet company that has more visitors and users across its combined properties than any other company. Is it realizing all the revenue it can from all those customers? Not really. In fact, competitor Google Inc. (NASDAQ: GOOG) is sucking Yahoo!'s well of customers dry each month using roughly one revenue avenue -- text-based search advertising. Yahoo! was late to realize that advertising was the place to be, rather than trying to get customers to pay for premium services and content that they can get elsewhere for free. Result? Yahoo! is scrambling to catch up to the mover and shaker in the industry -- and it ain't Yahoo!.

Yahoo!'s search for a new CFO ended last week. The catch, one with deep financial market ties, speaks volumes about potential Yahoo! strategy in the months and years to come. Blake Jorgensen's appointment means that Yahoo! may be looking to shed non-core assets or even set itself up to be sold. Yahoo!'s lingering rumor that it join with Microsoft Corp. (NASDAQ: MSFT) has been vanquished (again), which leaves Yahoo! standing in the dark corner with a lit match while Google runs all over town with a bonfire on its back.

Yahoo! is losing some key employees as the "grass is greener" attitude continues to infiltrate the company. It's been speculated that 2007 may see the end of Terry Semel as Yahoo!'s CEO after some nice moves in 2002 and 2003 did not pay off as planned and Google's furtive moves caught the Yahoo! guard off-guard. The recovery has not panned out at all either and still remains murky. If Semel can somehow manage to get Yahoo! back in the prominent spotlight (and making more money based on all the customer relationships it has), he may be safe. It is not, however, happening to the degree YHOO shareholders are needing at this point.

Yahoo! (NASDAQ: YHOO) and Google, Inc. (NASDAQ: GOOG) continue to turn up those collective noses every time the subject of "click fraud" comes up to bat. It's something all companies that bill ad partners for mouse clicks can't avoid, and the legions of unscrupulous hucksters who want to cost competitors marketing dollars for bogus clicks will not end any time soon. Google has made it a point of saying it has very sophisticated and proprietary systems to track the causes of click fraud and return ad spends to clients who believe they are victims.

Are paying customers satisfied with that promise? At an InterACT Conference today in San Francisco, a chief research scientist for Fair Isaac will say that 10% to 15% of clicks billed to Pay-Per-Click (PPC) advertisers that use Google, Yahoo!, Microsoft (NASDAQ: MSFT) and other Internet portals are the result of fraudulent traffic. Now, this will be an interesting statement to forensically dissect, as in "how does he know that?"

Google will most definitely hear from ad partners who continue to maintain that they lose millions of dollars to worthless clicks (clicks that result in no actionable intention from the clicker). As such, Google's constant battle with the actual methodology and motives of those reporting significant levels of click fraud will again be front and center here. Is Fair Isaac inflating its estimates with an ulterior motive in tow? Google probably thinks that, as Fair Isaac sees a new "fraud prevention" business model ripe for exploit here. Or, does it?