<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd">
<channel>
<title>BloggingStocks</title>
<link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com</link>
<description>BloggingStocks</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Closing Bell: Despite positive close, oil, fed, mergers disappoint]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/12/closing-bell-despite-positive-close-oil-fed-mergers-disappoi/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/12/closing-bell-despite-positive-close-oil-fed-mergers-disappoi/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/12/closing-bell-despite-positive-close-oil-fed-mergers-disappoi/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/goog/" rel="tag">Google (GOOG)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/msft/" rel="tag">Microsoft (MSFT)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/yhoo/" rel="tag">Yahoo! (YHOO)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/brk-a/" rel="tag">Berkshire Hathaway (BRK.A)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/bud/" rel="tag">Anheuser-Busch InBev (BUD)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/leh/" rel="tag">Lehman Br Holdings (LEH)</a></p>While today's index levels closed up in positive territory, that is only part of the story. The major equity index levels were far higher after the open today. Retail sales rose more than expected but the sell-off we saw earlier in oil did not hold and oil prices took the gas away from us. Fed governor Plosser's comments about "rates need to rise" didn't help matters. Below are today's unofficial closing levels:<br />
<ul>
    <li>DJIA 12141.58 (+57.81)</li>
    <li>S&amp;P500 1339.87 (+4.38)</li>
    <li>NASDAQ 2404.35 (+10.34)</li>
    <li>10YR T-NOTE 4.205% (+0.132%)</li>
    <li>Major list of <a href="http://www.247wallst.com/2008/06/52-week-low-clu.html">52-Week Lows</a></li>
    <li><a href="http://www.247wallst.com/2008/06/top-10-pre-ma-8.html">Top 10 Analyst Calls</a></li>
    <li><a href="http://www.247wallst.com/2008/06/50-plus-ipo-gai.html">2008 IPO's up 50% or more</a></li>
</ul>
<br /><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/anheuser-busch-companies-inc/bud/nys">Anheuser-Busch Companies Inc.</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/anheuser-busch-companies-inc/bud/nys">BUD</a>) shares were up almost 5% by the final minutes of trading at $61.29 after InBev confirmed a <a href="http://www.247wallst.com/2008/05/buffett-berkshi.html">$65.00 initial buyout</a> offer for the beer giant last night. Interestingly enough, <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/berkshire-hathaway-inc-cl-a/brk.a/nys">Berkshire Hathaway, Inc.</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/berkshire-hathaway-inc-cl-a/brk.a/nys">BRK.A</a>, <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/berkshire-hathaway-inc-cl-a/brk.a/nys">BRK.B</a>) will have pocketed several hundred million dollars on this if you see his current holdings.<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/12/closing-bell-despite-positive-close-oil-fed-mergers-disappoi/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Closing Bell: Despite positive close, oil, fed, mergers disappoint</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/12/closing-bell-despite-positive-close-oil-fed-mergers-disappoi/">Closing Bell: Despite positive close, oil, fed, mergers disappoint</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 12 Jun 2008 16:19:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/12/closing-bell-despite-positive-close-oil-fed-mergers-disappoi/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1224044/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/12/closing-bell-despite-positive-close-oil-fed-mergers-disappoi/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>applied biosystems</category><category>AppliedBiosystems</category><category>charter communications</category><category>CharterCommunications</category><category>invitrogen</category><category>jerry yang</category><category>JerryYang</category><category>terry semel</category><category>TerrySemel</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jon Ogg]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 12 Jun 2008 16:19:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Former Yahoo! CEO Semel leaves board of directors]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/02/01/former-yahoo-ceo-semel-leaves-board-of-directors/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/02/01/former-yahoo-ceo-semel-leaves-board-of-directors/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/02/01/former-yahoo-ceo-semel-leaves-board-of-directors/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/insiders/" rel="tag">Insiders</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/goog/" rel="tag">Google (GOOG)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/yhoo/" rel="tag">Yahoo! (YHOO)</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/02/yahoologo.gif" alt="" />The day after former <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/yahoo-inc/yhoo/nas">Yahoo, Inc.</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/yahoo-inc/yhoo/nas">YHOO</a>) CEO Terry Semel severed his ties with the company, Yahoo! gets an official bid from <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/microsoft-corporation/msft/nas">Microsoft Corp.</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/microsoft-corporation/msft/nas">MSFT</a>) <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/02/01/does-microsofts-44-6-bilion-bid-for-yahoo-makes-sense/">for over $44 billion</a>. Just this week, Yahoo!'s Jerry Yang gave a<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/01/29/yahoos-yang-warns-of-2008-headwinds-shares-slump/"> bleak outlook</a> for the company and shares nosedived. Could Yahoo! possibly have any more news this week? <em>Sheesh</em>.<br /><br />Let's stick to Semel. The former Warner Bros. star took Yahoo! under his wing back in 2002 and for all intents and purposes, guided the company from the bust days of the dot-com implosion to a business based on display advertising and paid services. <br /><br />Too bad <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/google-inc-cl-a/goog/nas">Google, Inc.</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/google-inc-cl-a/goog/nas">GOOG</a>) came along and soundly thrashed Yahoo! in every possible way, which lead to <a href="http://www.news.com/8301-10784_3-9862496-7.html">Semel's ouster in 2007</a> and what could be considered corporate theft with his preposterous exit package. Even Yahoo! co-founder Jerry Yang's return to the CEO spot can't stop this company from floundering, while Google continues to thrive.<br /><br />So, it comes as no surprise that Semel, who did not leave his board of directors position when he stepped down (er, was pushed down) from the CEO spot, finally left his board seat yesterday and severed ties with Yahoo! If someone else hires Semel because of some alleged starpower, they'll be getting a CEO who <em>didn't do much</em> in his 5+ year tenure at the former largest web property on the planet. Perhaps Microsoft can hire him as an adviser to its <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/02/01/does-microsofts-44-6-bilion-bid-for-yahoo-makes-sense/">proposed acquisition</a>?<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/02/01/former-yahoo-ceo-semel-leaves-board-of-directors/">Former Yahoo! CEO Semel leaves board of directors</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 01 Feb 2008 10:56:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.news.com/8301-10784_3-9862496-7.html>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/02/01/former-yahoo-ceo-semel-leaves-board-of-directors/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1103626/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/02/01/former-yahoo-ceo-semel-leaves-board-of-directors/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>inthenews</category><category>Terry Semel</category><category>TerrySemel</category><category>Yahoo!</category><category>Yahoo! CEO</category><category>Yahoo!Ceo</category><category>YHOO</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Brian White]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 01 Feb 2008 10:56:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Does anyone want to buy Yahoo?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/01/03/does-anyone-want-to-buy-yahoo/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/01/03/does-anyone-want-to-buy-yahoo/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/01/03/does-anyone-want-to-buy-yahoo/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/rumors/" rel="tag">Rumors</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/yhoo/" rel="tag">Yahoo! (YHOO)</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/01/yhoo.jpg" />Another year, another round of <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/yahoo-inc/yhoo/nas">Yahoo! Inc.</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/yahoo-inc/yhoo/nas">YHOO</a>) acquisition chatter. But would any company really want to acquire Yahoo? A market cap of over $33 billion should be enough to give any company pause, and with its growth rate and profitability teetering along at the age-old web giant, the price of admission is probably too high. Forget <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/microsoft-corporation/msft/nas">Microsoft</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/microsoft-corporation/msft/nas">MSFT</a>) -- that would be the worst mistake the software company could make. Anyone else? A show of hands please?<br /><br />Jerry Yang, now the company's CEO, and David Filo desperately want a turnaround at the company they founded. Once the highest flier on the web scene, Yahoo! has been dragged down by the rapid ascension of <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/google-inc/goog/nas">Google</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/google-inc/goog/nas">GOOG</a>). <br /><br />Yahoo!, which still has a lot to offer, made a bad bet on its version of text advertising while Google walked off into the sunset with a formula that worked. Add that to former CEO Terry Semel's apparent incompetence in trying to balance paid services against comparable free services from the competition, and you get a company that is <a href="http://blog.wired.com/business/2008/01/who-on-earth-wo.html">in a funk</a> right now.<br /><br />Most likely, Yahoo! will not be acquired by another company, although it will continue to ring up partnerships to enhance its bottom line. Still, the core functionality of the company is at stake here, and there's miles of work to be done in 2008 -- which will be a make or break year. Even at $10 billion, it's hard to fathom who would want to purchase Yahoo! That means the company is in it for the long haul, and the competition from Microsoft and Google will only get hotter from here.<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/01/03/does-anyone-want-to-buy-yahoo/">Does anyone want to buy Yahoo?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 03 Jan 2008 11:24:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://blog.wired.com/business/2008/01/who-on-earth-wo.html>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/01/03/does-anyone-want-to-buy-yahoo/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1075901/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/01/03/does-anyone-want-to-buy-yahoo/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>David Filo</category><category>DavidFilo</category><category>Google</category><category>Jerry Yang</category><category>JerryYang</category><category>Microsoft</category><category>MSFT</category><category>Terry Semel</category><category>TerrySemel</category><category>Yahoo acquisition</category><category>Yahoo!</category><category>YahooAcquisition</category><category>YHOO</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Brian White]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 03 Jan 2008 11:24:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Best &amp; Worst of 2007: Best CEO departure of 2007]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/11/29/best-and-worst-of-2007-best-ceo-departure-of-2007/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/11/29/best-and-worst-of-2007-best-ceo-departure-of-2007/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/11/29/best-and-worst-of-2007-best-ceo-departure-of-2007/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/management/" rel="tag">Management</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/yhoo/" rel="tag">Yahoo! (YHOO)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/f/" rel="tag">Ford Motor (F)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/hd/" rel="tag">Home Depot (HD)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/c/" rel="tag">Citigroup Inc. (C)</a></p><p><em><iframe align="left" src="http://webcenter.polls.aol.com/modular.jsp?template=1512&amp;view=127256&amp;pollId=127356&amp;channel=aol_us_personalfinance&amp;popup=yes" frameborder="0" width="229" scrolling="no" height="190"></iframe>This post was part of AOL Money &amp; Finance's </em><em><a href="http://money.aol.com/special/best-and-worst-2007"><strong>Best &amp; Worst of 2007</strong></a>. Voting has now closed and, in a close race, readers have chosen <strong><a href="http://money.aol.com/special/best-and-worst-2007/winners?photo=12">Chuck Prince</a> </strong>as the best CEO departure of the year.</em> <em>Let us know in the comments if you are pleased with this result.</em></p>
<p><img alt="Departing CEOs " hspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/11/bw-07-186-chuck-prince-cs112007.jpg" align="right" vspace="4" border="1" />When looking back at 2007, there were some larger-than-life CEO departures that semi-rocked the business world and brought some investors to the realization of over-the-top compensation yet again. Let's look at a few and then you can decide the winner. Sound good?</p>
<p>First up comes <strong>Bill Ford, Jr.</strong>, from the automotive industry. Under Ford's leadership, <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/ford-motor-company/f/nys">Ford Motor Co.</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/ford-motor-company/f/nys">F</a>) lost its way in terms of correctly forecasting what kind of vehicles customers actually wanted, in addition to becoming horribly leveraged. As soon as gas prices began shooting up, Ford Motor started spiraling down. Long-time <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/the-boeing-company/ba/nys">Boeing Co.</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/the-boeing-company/ba/nys">BA</a>) executive Alan Mulally was brought in to replace Ford as the automaker's CEO just in the nick of time. Ford Motor's expected profitability date with Ford now gone: 2009.</p>
<p>How about <strong>Bob Nardelli</strong>, formerly CEO of <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/the-home-depot-inc/hd/nys">Home Depot Inc.</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/the-home-depot-inc/hd/nys">HD</a>)? Nardelli made global headlines by making tens of millions while leading Home Depot shares to the basement and apparently making all kinds of bad decisions that finally led to his ouster this year. On top of that, his severance package made a Brad Pitt paycheck seem like pennies, and Home Depot shareholders paid for it. Did Home Depot stakeholders get a voice in this corporate travesty? A small one, perhaps.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/11/29/best-and-worst-of-2007-best-ceo-departure-of-2007/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Best &amp; Worst of 2007: Best CEO departure of 2007</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/11/29/best-and-worst-of-2007-best-ceo-departure-of-2007/">Best &amp; Worst of 2007: Best CEO departure of 2007</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 29 Nov 2007 06:10:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/11/29/best-and-worst-of-2007-best-ceo-departure-of-2007/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1041160/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/11/29/best-and-worst-of-2007-best-ceo-departure-of-2007/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Alan Mulally</category><category>BA</category><category>Best and Worst of 2007</category><category>Bill Ford</category><category>Bob Nardelli</category><category>Boeing</category><category>CEOs</category><category>Chuck Prince</category><category>Citigroup</category><category>executive compensation</category><category>Ford</category><category>GOOG</category><category>Google</category><category>HD</category><category>Home Depot</category><category>Sandy Weil</category><category>Terry Semel</category><category>Yahoo!</category><category>YHOO</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Brian White]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 29 Nov 2007 06:10:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Option update 10-26-007: YHOO and MSFT rally with YHOO volatility up, MSFT volatility down]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/10/26/option-update-10-26-007-yhoo-and-msft-rally-yhoo-volatility-up/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/10/26/option-update-10-26-007-yhoo-and-msft-rally-yhoo-volatility-up/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/10/26/option-update-10-26-007-yhoo-and-msft-rally-yhoo-volatility-up/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/msft/" rel="tag">Microsoft (MSFT)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/yhoo/" rel="tag">Yahoo! (YHOO)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/options/" rel="tag">Options</a></p><p><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/yahoo-inc/yhoo/nas"><strong><img align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/10/flywall_final_logo_mini.gif" /></strong><strong>Yahoo! Inc</strong></a><strong> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/yahoo-inc/yhoo/nas">YHOO</a>) recently up $2.40 to $33.74:</strong></p>
<p><a href="http://www.Alibaba.com">www.Alibaba.com</a>, a Chinese internet company, is expected to be IPO'd on the Hong Kong bourse on November 6th. YHOO made a $1.4 billion investment in 39% of Alibaba in 2005. YHOO Chairman of the Board Terry Semel sold 850,000 shares of YHOO at $30.47 October 23-24, according to Dow Jones. YHOO call option volume of 503,701 contracts compares to put volume of 52,600 contracts. YHOO November option implied volatility of 50 is above its 26-week average of 37 according to Track Data, suggesting larger price risk. </p>
<p><strong><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/microsoft-corporation/msft/nas">Microsoft Corporation</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/microsoft-corporation/msft/nas">MSFT</a>) recently up $2.91 to $34.90:</strong><br /></p>
<p>Pacific Growth Equities says " Blowout F1Q results; conservative guidance leave room for additional upside if the sales momentum continues." MSFT call option volume of 353,588 contracts compares to put volume of 114,142 contracts. MSFT November option implied volatility of 25 is below a pre-EPS level of 32 according to Track Data, suggesting decreasing risk.<br /><br /><em>Daily options Update is provided by Stock Specialist Paul Foster of theflyonthewall.com.</em></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/10/26/option-update-10-26-007-yhoo-and-msft-rally-yhoo-volatility-up/">Option update 10-26-007: YHOO and MSFT rally with YHOO volatility up, MSFT volatility down</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 26 Oct 2007 17:10:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.alibaba.com/>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/10/26/option-update-10-26-007-yhoo-and-msft-rally-yhoo-volatility-up/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1023051/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/10/26/option-update-10-26-007-yhoo-and-msft-rally-yhoo-volatility-up/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Alibaba.com</category><category>Chinese internet</category><category>ChineseInternet</category><category>Hong Kong bourse IPO</category><category>HongKongBourseIpo</category><category>Jerry Yang internet search info</category><category>JerryYangInternetSearchInfo</category><category>Pacific Growth Equities</category><category>PacificGrowthEquities</category><category>profit growth revenue increase</category><category>ProfitGrowthRevenueIncrease</category><category>sales momentum</category><category>SalesMomentum</category><category>Steve Ballmer Bill Gates empowering</category><category>SteveBallmerBillGatesEmpowering</category><category>Terry Semel</category><category>TerrySemel</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Paul Foster]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 26 Oct 2007 17:10:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Yahoo!'s (YHOO) '100-day review' nears end: Are investors still patient?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/10/15/yahoo-s-yhoo-100-day-review-nears-end-are-investors-still/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/10/15/yahoo-s-yhoo-100-day-review-nears-end-are-investors-still/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/10/15/yahoo-s-yhoo-100-day-review-nears-end-are-investors-still/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/rumors/" rel="tag">Rumors</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/management/" rel="tag">Management</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/internet/" rel="tag">Internet</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/goog/" rel="tag">Google (GOOG)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/yhoo/" rel="tag">Yahoo! (YHOO)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/technology/" rel="tag">Technology</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/08/yahoo-yhoo.jpg" alt="Yahoo (NASDAQ: YHOO) logo" />When <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/yahoo-inc/yhoo/nas">Yahoo</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/yahoo-inc/yhoo/nas">YHOO</a>) co-founder Jerry Yang returned to the CEO role this past summer, he gave investors and watching employees a "100-day review" speech that basically gave Yang time to study, assess and form solutions on getting the internet behemoth back on track for higher growth levels and ensuring it wasn't losing ad revenue to the competition.<br /><br />Well, that <a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/companyNewsAndPR/idUSN1223814720071012">100 days is now nearly over with</a>, and even the few acquisitions (<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/09/05/yahoo-yhoo-hopes-bluelithium-can-make-ads-pay/">BlueLithium</a> and <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/09/19/yahoo-s-yhoo-zimbra-buy-worth-every-penny/">Zimbra</a>) that Yahoo! has made recently have not quenched the irrational desire of analysts who aren't satisfied until immediate results happen. This is, of course, so unrealistic it's laughable. Any analyst should know drastic changes take time to work, aside from massive layoffs that can immediately affect a company's finances. This is not the case with Yahoo!, which is trying desperately to keep up with competitor <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/google-inc/goog/nas">Google</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/google-inc/goog/nas">GOOG</a>) in the space for online advertising.<br /><br />Although Yang has professed that nothing within the company is a "sacred cow," industry watchers may be already impatient in waiting for the company to somehow reinvent its business to capture more growth that Google appears to be hauling in by the truckload at the moment. Nothing so far looks like the "radical surgery" that many pundits probably thought would happen, and with <a href="http://googleinvestors.blogspot.com/">Google set to deliver Q3 results</a> this Thursday, the pressure cooker may become even more intense soon.<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/10/15/yahoo-s-yhoo-100-day-review-nears-end-are-investors-still/">Yahoo!'s (YHOO) '100-day review' nears end: Are investors still patient?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 15 Oct 2007 14:09:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.reuters.com/article/companyNewsAndPR/idUSN1223814720071012>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/10/15/yahoo-s-yhoo-100-day-review-nears-end-are-investors-still/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1013334/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/10/15/yahoo-s-yhoo-100-day-review-nears-end-are-investors-still/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>analysts</category><category>GOOG</category><category>Google</category><category>inthenews</category><category>investors</category><category>Jerry Yang</category><category>JerryYang</category><category>performance</category><category>review</category><category>Terry Semel</category><category>TerrySemel</category><category>Yahoo!</category><category>YHOO</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Brian White]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 15 Oct 2007 14:09:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Yahoo! (YHOO) may sell Kelkoo shopping site]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/10/04/yahoo-yhoo-may-sell-kelkoo-shopping-site/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/10/04/yahoo-yhoo-may-sell-kelkoo-shopping-site/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/10/04/yahoo-yhoo-may-sell-kelkoo-shopping-site/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/deals/" rel="tag">Deals</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/rumors/" rel="tag">Rumors</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/yhoo/" rel="tag">Yahoo! (YHOO)</a></p>Another part of former CEO Terry Semel's strategy at <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/yahoo-inc/yhoo/nas">Yahoo, Inc.</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/yahoo-inc/yhoo/nas">YHOO</a>) is being readied for a sale, as Yahoo's Kelkoo online shopping comparison site will probably <a href="http://investing.reuters.co.uk/news/articleinvesting.aspx?type=tnBusinessNews&amp;storyID=2007-10-03T111852Z_01_N03457573_RTRIDST_0_BUSINESS-YAHOO-KELKOO-DC.XML">go up on the bidding block</a> soon. Kelkoo was purchased by Yahoo! in 2004 for roughly $670 million and was to be the premier price comparison shopping resource for all of Europe. Alas, as Yahoo! streamlines its strategy and dumps off non-core pieces of its business, this one too may be gone soon.<br /><br />Yahoo! has already shut down its own photos website and plans to close its podcast service later this year, so the company seems to be wasting no time unloading non-core assets as it tries to get back to making money in several core areas while maintaining a lean offered-services structure. A few years ago, Yahoo! offered so much to so many that it was hard not to think of it as having a strategy of "offering something for everybody." Problem is, many of those areas distracted it from core businesses and could not stand on their own right. With company co-founder Jerry Yang in charge now, some Yahoo! services are finally being scuttled, as they should have been long ago. Even Yahoo! Music is facing some cutbacks, although a complete shutdown is seen as unlikely.<br /><br />Although a Yahoo! spokesperson stated that "one of the priorities we have identified is improving the performance of Kelkoo -- our online shopping business." By improving, perhaps he meant getting the service in shape to sell off to someone else. In terms of online comparison shopping, it's hard to see why Yahoo! needed to play in a crowded field dominated by larger players like <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/ebay-inc/ebay/nas">eBay, Inc.'s</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/ebay-inc/ebay/nas">EBAY</a>) <a href="http://www.shopping.com">shopping.com</a> and many others like it.<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/10/04/yahoo-yhoo-may-sell-kelkoo-shopping-site/">Yahoo! (YHOO) may sell Kelkoo shopping site</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 04 Oct 2007 12:13:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://investing.reuters.co.uk/news/articleinvesting.aspx?type=tnBusinessNews&amp;storyID=2007-10-03T111852Z_01_N03457573_RTRIDST_0_BUSINESS-YAHOO-KELKOO-DC.XML>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/10/04/yahoo-yhoo-may-sell-kelkoo-shopping-site/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1005162/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/10/04/yahoo-yhoo-may-sell-kelkoo-shopping-site/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Jerry Yang</category><category>JerryYang</category><category>Kelkoo</category><category>Terry Semel</category><category>TerrySemel</category><category>Yahoo!</category><category>YHOO</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Brian White]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 04 Oct 2007 12:13:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Democrats winning 2008 CEO money primary]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/09/21/democrats-winning-2008-ceo-money-primary/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/09/21/democrats-winning-2008-ceo-money-primary/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/09/21/democrats-winning-2008-ceo-money-primary/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/yhoo/" rel="tag">Yahoo! (YHOO)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/ms/" rel="tag">Morgan Stanley (MS)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/nws/" rel="tag">News Corp'B' (NWS)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/politics/" rel="tag">Politics</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/presidential-elections/" rel="tag">Presidential Elections</a></p><p>The official election is more than a year away; but the Democratic party is trouncing the Republics in the CEO money primary. According to <em><a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601070&amp;sid=afaR_KaZJEds&amp;refer=home">Bloomberg News</a></em>, some of George W. Bush's top 2004 fund-raisers, are now helping Democrats running for president.</p>
<p>Among the 60 executives writing checks to Democrats such as Senators Hillary Clinton of New York and Barack Obama of Illinois are these formerly pro-Bush CEOs:</p>
<ul>
    <li><strong><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/morgan-stanley/ms/nys?tabs=quotesandnews">Morgan Stanley's</a></strong> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/morgan-stanley/ms/nys">MS</a>) CEO John Mack, a Bush Ranger, held a fund-raiser for Clinton in July. He wrote to his executives "I personally believe that [the best] person [running for president in 2008] is Hillary Clinton." </li>
    <li><strong><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/yahoo-inc/yhoo/nas?tabs=quotesandnews">Yahoo Inc.'s</a></strong> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/yahoo-inc/yhoo/nas?tabs=quotesandnews">YHOO</a>) former CEO Terry Semel gave $2,000 to Bush in 2004 and $50,000 to the Republican National Committee. Semel has given the maximum, $4,600, to Clinton and $2,300 to Obama. </li>
    <li><strong><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/news-corporation/nws/nys?tabs=quotesandnews">News Corp.</a></strong> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/news-corporation/nws/nys?tabs=quotesandnews">NWS</a>) CEO Rupert Murdoch, who donated $25,000 to the Republican National Committee in 2004, has given Clinton $2,300. </li>
</ul><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/09/21/democrats-winning-2008-ceo-money-primary/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Democrats winning 2008 CEO money primary</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/09/21/democrats-winning-2008-ceo-money-primary/">Democrats winning 2008 CEO money primary</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 21 Sep 2007 14:40:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601070&amp;sid=afaR_KaZJEds&amp;refer=home>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/09/21/democrats-winning-2008-ceo-money-primary/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/995086/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/09/21/democrats-winning-2008-ceo-money-primary/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>barack obama</category><category>BarackObama</category><category>democratic party</category><category>DemocraticParty</category><category>election</category><category>GOP</category><category>hillary clinton</category><category>HillaryClinton</category><category>inthenews</category><category>john mack</category><category>JohnMack</category><category>ms</category><category>nws</category><category>political fundraising</category><category>PoliticalFundraising</category><category>politics</category><category>presidential election</category><category>PresidentialElection</category><category>republican party</category><category>RepublicanParty</category><category>rupert murdoch</category><category>RupertMurdoch</category><category>terry semel</category><category>TerrySemel</category><category>yhoo</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Peter Cohan]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 21 Sep 2007 14:40:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Yahoo! in for a quiet period?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/07/10/yahoo-in-for-a-quiet-period/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/07/10/yahoo-in-for-a-quiet-period/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/07/10/yahoo-in-for-a-quiet-period/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/forecasts/" rel="tag">Forecasts</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/industry/" rel="tag">Industry</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/goog/" rel="tag">Google (GOOG)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/msft/" rel="tag">Microsoft (MSFT)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/yhoo/" rel="tag">Yahoo! (YHOO)</a></p><p>After last month's brouhaha when <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/yahoo-inc/yhoo/nas">Yahoo!</a> Inc. (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/yahoo-inc/yhoo/nas">YHOO</a>) announced that Terry Semel was resigning his CEO post and co-founder Jerry Yang was taking the reigns, the company has gone rather quiet. Can't blame Yahoo for the peace and quiet.</p>
<p>Yang has to wrap his arms around the company and that will take time. Even though he is the co-founder, the role of CEO encompasses the daily grind of evaluating business units, the progress or lack of progress piece by piece. Yahoo could almost be forgiven if it misses its June quarter. In fact, investors would almost welcome the event. </p>
<p>Professional portfolio managers like it when an incoming CEO absolutely cleans house and wipes the slate clean for a new beginning. With that process comes the exercise of lowering near-term expectations, thus allowing for the desired joy of under-promising and over-delivering. The best time for this cleansing is after a new CEO's first quarter on the job. All the bad stuff gets blamed on the ousted CEO, while the new CEO gets to reset the bar.</p>
<p>Yahoo! is far behind <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/google-inc-cl-a/goog/nas">Google</a> Inc. (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/google-inc-cl-a/goog/nas">GOOG</a>) in so many areas like search engine, advertising programs, etc. The best course of action that Jerry Yang can take now is to right the ship, set the revenue and earnings expectations to realistic, yet beatable numbers and potentially set up the company for a wealthier parent. Yahoo!, at the end of the day, should merge with <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/microsoft-corporation/msft/nas">Microsoft</a> Corp. (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/microsoft-corporation/msft/nas">MSFT</a>) if either company intends to effectively compete with Google. Otherwise it is game, set and match.</p>
<p><em>Georges Yared is the Chief Investment Strategist of <a href="http://www.georgesyared.com/">Yared Investment Research</a>.</em></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/07/10/yahoo-in-for-a-quiet-period/">Yahoo! in for a quiet period?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 10 Jul 2007 10:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/07/10/yahoo-in-for-a-quiet-period/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/936775/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/07/10/yahoo-in-for-a-quiet-period/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>goog</category><category>google</category><category>jerry yang</category><category>JerryYang</category><category>microsoft</category><category>msft</category><category>terry semel</category><category>TerrySemel</category><category>yahoo</category><category>yahoo!</category><category>yhoo</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Georges Yared]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 10 Jul 2007 10:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Could Yahoo!, Rivals, and ESPN team up to take on Google?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/06/24/could-yahoo-rivals-and-espn-team-up-to-take-on-google/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/06/24/could-yahoo-rivals-and-espn-team-up-to-take-on-google/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/06/24/could-yahoo-rivals-and-espn-team-up-to-take-on-google/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/deals/" rel="tag">Deals</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/rumors/" rel="tag">Rumors</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/competitive-strategy/" rel="tag">Competitive Strategy</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/goog/" rel="tag">Google (GOOG)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/yhoo/" rel="tag">Yahoo! (YHOO)</a></p><p>Here it is, right in front of you, <a href="http://today.reuters.com/news/articlenews.aspx?type=technologyNews&amp;storyid=2007-06-21T143404Z_01_N20311282_RTRUKOC_0_US-YAHOO-SPORTS.xml&amp;src=nl_ustechnology">the opportunity of a lifetime</a> for <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/yahoo-inc/yhoo/nas">Yahoo! Inc.</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/yahoo-inc/yhoo/nas">YHOO</a>). With the Rivals.com deal now in hand, making Yahoo a larger internet sports media interest than ESPN, the iron is hot and ready to strike a working partnership between Yahoo! and ESPN. If the two entities can hammer something out that makes full use of each companies strengths, we would most probably witness the birth of an internet sports composite that <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/google-inc-cl-a/goog/nas">Google</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/google-inc-cl-a/goog/nas">GOOG</a>) couldn't touch. Wouldn't it be nice to see Yahoo! as the <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/06/19/yahoos-handling-of-financial-blogs-says-it-all/">undeniable leader in something</a>? Admit it to yourself, Yahoo! deserves it.</p>
<p>I have no idea if there have been corporate discussions regarding such a working partnership, but you must consider that Yahoo! and ESPN are more than a little aware of each other, and if there's one thing that Yahoo! must be tired of right about now it would be the concept of vainly slugging it out with other large internet properties.</p>
<p>Let us watch carefully to see if some new strategies start seeping out of Yahoo! Perhaps Jerry Yang has secretly been <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/06/19/yahoo-wont-be-able-to-catch-google-even-with-a-new-ceo/">waiting for Terry Semel to be dislodged</a> before instigating some new ideas. If I held Yahoo! shares right now I'd be very hesitant to sell them, and I'd even consider adding a few. <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/06/19/yahoos-terry-semel-got-googled/">Yahoo! has been floundering</a>, but it is far from being counted out. I repeat my conviction that if Yahoo! will just just try to forget about Google and begin to cut it's own swath, it will do far better in the long run than by continuing to beat its head against the "Great Wall of Google."</p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/06/24/could-yahoo-rivals-and-espn-team-up-to-take-on-google/">Could Yahoo!, Rivals, and ESPN team up to take on Google?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Sun, 24 Jun 2007 09:10:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/06/24/could-yahoo-rivals-and-espn-team-up-to-take-on-google/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/923853/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/06/24/could-yahoo-rivals-and-espn-team-up-to-take-on-google/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>acquire</category><category>BloggingStocks</category><category>buy</category><category>ESPN</category><category>GOOG</category><category>Google</category><category>Jerry Yang</category><category>JerryYang</category><category>purchase</category><category>Rivals</category><category>Rivals.com</category><category>sports media</category><category>Terry Semel</category><category>Yahoo</category><category>YHOO</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Gary Sattler]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 24 Jun 2007 09:10:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Slaughterhouse II: Stocks headed for rough Q2 numbers]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/06/19/slaughterhouse-ii-stocks-headed-for-rough-q2-numbers/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/06/19/slaughterhouse-ii-stocks-headed-for-rough-q2-numbers/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/06/19/slaughterhouse-ii-stocks-headed-for-rough-q2-numbers/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/earnings-reports/" rel="tag">Earnings Reports</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/forecasts/" rel="tag">Forecasts</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/bad-news/" rel="tag">Bad News</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/yhoo/" rel="tag">Yahoo! (YHOO)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/intc/" rel="tag">Intel (INTC)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/f/" rel="tag">Ford Motor (F)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/t/" rel="tag">AT and T (T)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/amd/" rel="tag">Advanced Micro Dev (AMD)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/java/" rel="tag">Sun Microsystems (JAVA)</a></p><p>A certain number of large cap stock disappoint every quarter. Usually their stocks get punished in the days and weeks after. Solid quarterly numbers with weak guidance can be just as bad. But, there are some companies that give off signal or compete in industries where the competitive trends are working against them.</p>
<p>A few red flag companies:</p>
<p><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/ford-motor-company/f/nys">Ford</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/ford-motor-company/f/nys">F</a>): Some members of the Ford family <a href="http://www.247wallst.com/2007/06/the_slaughter_h_2.html">want to retain bankers</a> to see if they can cash out their shares. Sales of the important F-series pick-ups and Explorer lines are falling faster than forecast. Even with labor negotiations coming up, costs may not fall. </p>
<p> </p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/06/19/slaughterhouse-ii-stocks-headed-for-rough-q2-numbers/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Slaughterhouse II: Stocks headed for rough Q2 numbers</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/06/19/slaughterhouse-ii-stocks-headed-for-rough-q2-numbers/">Slaughterhouse II: Stocks headed for rough Q2 numbers</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 19 Jun 2007 16:35:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/06/19/slaughterhouse-ii-stocks-headed-for-rough-q2-numbers/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/921683/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/06/19/slaughterhouse-ii-stocks-headed-for-rough-q2-numbers/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>AAPL</category><category>AMD</category><category>Clearwire</category><category>CLWR</category><category>F</category><category>INTC</category><category>iPhone</category><category>Linux</category><category>S</category><category>SUNW</category><category>T</category><category>Terry Semel</category><category>TerrySemel</category><category>WiMax</category><category>YHOO</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Douglas McIntyre]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 19 Jun 2007 16:35:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Yahoo! won't be able to catch Google, even with a new CEO]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/06/19/yahoo-wont-be-able-to-catch-google-even-with-a-new-ceo/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/06/19/yahoo-wont-be-able-to-catch-google-even-with-a-new-ceo/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/06/19/yahoo-wont-be-able-to-catch-google-even-with-a-new-ceo/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/good-news/" rel="tag">Good news</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/management/" rel="tag">Management</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/goog/" rel="tag">Google (GOOG)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/yhoo/" rel="tag">Yahoo! (YHOO)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/employees/" rel="tag">Employees</a></p><p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/06/terry-semel.jpg" />After yesterday's <a href="http://money.cnn.com/news/newsfeeds/articles/djf500/200706190022DOWJONESDJONLINE000010_FORTUNE5.htm">no-surprise announcement</a> that <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/yahoo-inc/yhoo/nas">Yahoo!</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/yahoo-inc/yhoo/nas">YHOO</a>) <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/06/18/terry-semel-resigns-yahoo-founder-jerry-yang-takes-over/">CEO Terry Semel would resign</a> his post and take the role of non-executive chairman, I was confused as to why Semel even wants to stay with Yahoo! </p>
<p>Semel already has gotten a huge payday, so it looks like he's sticking around so the board can save face, which is disgusting. Yet again, executives are rewarded while shareholders get stiffed. I'm glad I don't own Yahoo or I would have Semel's head on a platter. </p>
<p>Still, you have to wonder <a href="http://yhoo.bloggingstocks.com/">what in the world is going on</a> in Sunnyvale. Company co-founder Jerry Yang is stepping in as CEO (for some odd reason) instead of seasoned executive <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/06/18/susan-decker-passed-over-for-yahoo-ceo-role-always-the-bridesm/">Susan Decker</a>, who is taking over as president, thankfully. </p>
<p> Yahoo! will never regain its former glory. <br /></p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/06/19/yahoo-wont-be-able-to-catch-google-even-with-a-new-ceo/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Yahoo! won't be able to catch Google, even with a new CEO</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/06/19/yahoo-wont-be-able-to-catch-google-even-with-a-new-ceo/">Yahoo! won't be able to catch Google, even with a new CEO</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 19 Jun 2007 13:15:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://money.cnn.com/news/newsfeeds/articles/djf500/200706190022DOWJONESDJONLINE000010_FORTUNE5.htm>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/06/19/yahoo-wont-be-able-to-catch-google-even-with-a-new-ceo/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/921376/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/06/19/yahoo-wont-be-able-to-catch-google-even-with-a-new-ceo/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>goog</category><category>Jerry Yang</category><category>JerryYang</category><category>Susan Decker</category><category>SusanDecker</category><category>Terry Semel</category><category>TerrySemel</category><category>Yahoo!</category><category>Yahoo! CEO</category><category>Yahoo!Ceo</category><category>yhoo</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Brian White]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 19 Jun 2007 13:15:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Yahoo's Terry Semel got Googled!]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/06/19/yahoos-terry-semel-got-googled/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/06/19/yahoos-terry-semel-got-googled/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/06/19/yahoos-terry-semel-got-googled/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/management/" rel="tag">Management</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/competitive-strategy/" rel="tag">Competitive Strategy</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/goog/" rel="tag">Google (GOOG)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/msft/" rel="tag">Microsoft (MSFT)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/yhoo/" rel="tag">Yahoo! (YHOO)</a></p><p>2001 was a long, long time ago. In the ever-evolving world of technology, six years can be measured in dog-years: one dog year equals seven human years. Terry Semel rode in to <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/yahoo-inc/yhoo/nas">Yahoo!</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/yahoo-inc/yhoo/nas">YHOO</a>) as the savior, the professional manager who would move this absolutely cool company to the next level. The space was evolving and revolving in a huge way. Nobody could even put a bona-fide growth rate on the internet search/ marketing/advertising/communication field. Semel thought he had entered a marathon.</p>
<p>In 2001, <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/google-inc-cl-a/goog/nas">Google</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/google-inc-cl-a/goog/nas">GOOG</a>) was only three years old, as the company was founded in 1998. The secrecy surrounding Google was legendary, yet weird. Google was formidable, but it was also private. Numbers were never confirmed, but people in the know whispered Google was catching Yahoo and knocking it from its premier position. Google was gathering headlines and believers while Yahoo! was reporting good, not great, or consistent quarterly numbers. The technology media and its close-followers knew Google was catching Yahoo!, it was only a matter of time.</p>
<p>The world realized in 2004 that Google was also running a marathon, but with a sprinter's speed. Google completed its <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/ipo/">initial public offering</a> in August 2004 and was crowned the winner: game, set and match. Immediately, the market propelled Google to a market capitalization that has surpassed Yahoo!'s. As of this writing, Yahoo! is a faint figure in Google's rear view mirror. Google is worth $160 billion while Yahoo! is a respectable $37 billion.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/06/19/yahoos-terry-semel-got-googled/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Yahoo's Terry Semel got Googled!</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/06/19/yahoos-terry-semel-got-googled/">Yahoo's Terry Semel got Googled!</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 19 Jun 2007 12:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/06/19/yahoos-terry-semel-got-googled/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/921191/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/06/19/yahoos-terry-semel-got-googled/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>goog</category><category>google</category><category>jerry yang</category><category>JerryYang</category><category>microsoft</category><category>msft</category><category>susan decker</category><category>SusanDecker</category><category>terry semel</category><category>TerrySemel</category><category>yahoo!</category><category>yhoo</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Georges Yared]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 19 Jun 2007 12:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Was CEO Terry Semel really so bad that he had to resign?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/06/19/was-ceo-terry-semel-really-so-bad-that-he-had-to-resign/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/06/19/was-ceo-terry-semel-really-so-bad-that-he-had-to-resign/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/06/19/was-ceo-terry-semel-really-so-bad-that-he-had-to-resign/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/management/" rel="tag">Management</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/yhoo/" rel="tag">Yahoo! (YHOO)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/headline-news/" rel="tag">Headline News</a></p><p>So ... Was CEO Terry Semel really so bad that he had to resign?</p>
<p>In a word, yes. </p>
<p>In my opinion, Terry Semel needed to be shown the door long ago and should have made a quiet, respectful and pride-saving exit from <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/yahoo-inc/yhoo/nas">Yahoo!</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/yahoo-inc/yhoo/nas">YHOO</a>). I'm not happy with the way his resignation is now being handled either. He should be moving down the road to new and exciting endeavors, leaving Yahoo! to formulate its own <em>new</em> plans. Instead, he has gingerly stayed in his chairman role, in a non-executive role, hanging around like the brother-in-law who just wrecked your car and says he'll help you fix it.</p>
<p>Don't take my word for it, though. A flood of commentary from all across the web includes such things as:</p>
<p> "...it's safe to say, (the share holders) are not happy at all with the current performance and are sending a message loud and clear, Terry Semel's got to turn things around" - <a href="http://www.rssmicro.com/?f=0&amp;st=Yahoo+Shareholders&amp;fid=58121322">RSS Micro</a></p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/06/19/was-ceo-terry-semel-really-so-bad-that-he-had-to-resign/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Was CEO Terry Semel really so bad that he had to resign?</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/06/19/was-ceo-terry-semel-really-so-bad-that-he-had-to-resign/">Was CEO Terry Semel really so bad that he had to resign?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 19 Jun 2007 11:10:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/06/19/was-ceo-terry-semel-really-so-bad-that-he-had-to-resign/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/921264/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/06/19/was-ceo-terry-semel-really-so-bad-that-he-had-to-resign/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>CEO</category><category>Google</category><category>Jerry Yang</category><category>JerryYang</category><category>resignation</category><category>resigns</category><category>Susan Decker</category><category>SusanDecker</category><category>Terry Semel</category><category>TerrySemel</category><category>Yahoo</category><category>yhoo</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Gary Sattler]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 19 Jun 2007 11:10:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Yahoo's handling of financial blogs says it all]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/06/19/yahoos-handling-of-financial-blogs-says-it-all/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/06/19/yahoos-handling-of-financial-blogs-says-it-all/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/06/19/yahoos-handling-of-financial-blogs-says-it-all/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/management/" rel="tag">Management</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/competitive-strategy/" rel="tag">Competitive Strategy</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/goog/" rel="tag">Google (GOOG)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/yhoo/" rel="tag">Yahoo! (YHOO)</a></p><a href="http://www.theflyonthewall.com/splashPage.php?source=AOL"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/06/fly-logo-(aol).gif" alt="" /></a>What best symbolizes what went wrong at <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/yahoo-inc/yhoo/nas">Yahoo Inc</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/yahoo-inc/yhoo/nas">YHOO</a>)? How it handled the rise of financial blogging.<br /><br />When looking up stock quotes on Yahoo Finance, there is a financial blog section -- but it only publishes blogs from Seeking Alpha and no one else. Why? Because Terry Semel, Yahoo's ousted CEO, applied the old-boys media network model to Internet programming -- partner with large and well-established media companies and split up the profits. Did this work? No.<br /><br />"In Web 1.0, the publisher told you what to read, in web 2.0, the consumer is the boss," said Andy Monfried, president and founder of LOTAME, in a recent interview on Wallstrip.com. Monfried was a top executive at Advertising.com which he helped build into the leading third party advertising network which is now part of AOL.<br /><br />"Click through rates and brand methods do not apply any more. The cost to buy the media from social media networks is so much less than portals and other resources that have content. Going forward, advertising is all about user-generated content," Monfried noted.<br /><br />LOTAME stands for Local Target Media and wants to be the connector between local social content and advertisers such as a Myspace or Facebook with the local pizza guy or the national advertiser. Yahoo has preached for years of its desire to be the leader in bringing the Internet advertising model to the local guy, but it never succeeded. It is the user-generated content that is the missing link for success in this area and Semel never got it.<br /><br />Yahoo is in big trouble. <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/google-inc-cl-a/goog/nas">Google Inc</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/google-inc-cl-a/goog/nas">GOOG</a>) figured out what was going to work and has won Web 2.0. For Yahoo to succeed it will have to find something it can do differently than Google, possibly aligning with Myspace.com, which was speculated yesterday on CNBC.<br /><br />From an investment perspective, Yahoo's real estate position on the web is too big to pass up on. The Fly has blogged endlessly for the past year of Yahoo being a value stock and investors should jump into it and put it away. Our stance remains the same. A successfully run Yahoo has the potential to generate some big returns for shareholders.<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/06/19/yahoos-handling-of-financial-blogs-says-it-all/">Yahoo's handling of financial blogs says it all</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 19 Jun 2007 09:45:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/06/19/yahoos-handling-of-financial-blogs-says-it-all/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/921338/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/06/19/yahoos-handling-of-financial-blogs-says-it-all/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>blog</category><category>blogging</category><category>goog</category><category>google</category><category>myspace</category><category>seeking alpha</category><category>SeekingAlpha</category><category>semel</category><category>terry</category><category>terry semel</category><category>TerrySemel</category><category>yahoo</category><category>yahoo finance</category><category>YahooFinance</category><category>yhoo</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Eric Buscemi]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 19 Jun 2007 09:45:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Yahoo!'s webcast was dull and uninspiring]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/06/18/yahoo-s-webcast-was-dull-and-unispiring/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/06/18/yahoo-s-webcast-was-dull-and-unispiring/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/06/18/yahoo-s-webcast-was-dull-and-unispiring/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/rants-and-raves/" rel="tag">Rants and Raves</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/yhoo/" rel="tag">Yahoo! (YHOO)</a></p><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/yahoo-inc/yhoo/nas">Yahoo! Inc.</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/yahoo-inc/yhoo/nas">YHOO</a>) had just finished a <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/06/18/yahoo-ceo-semel-resigning-liveblogging-the-webcast/">webcast discussing the resignation</a> of Terry Semel from the CEO role and the appointment of Jerry Yang to that role. Sue Decker was appointed president. I, for one, found the webcast to be quite dull and most uninspiring. <br /><br />Not that I expected discussion of Semel's inflated compensation package during times Yahoo! struggled, but there was hardly any meat attached to the bare-bones news. Yes, each gushed over the other two in his or her turn, and each gave the appropriate ra-ra-ra speech of how Yahoo! will not only be a great competitor, but a winner too. Despite all that, they didn't instill much confidence in me, not about the future of Yahoo! and not about their ability to change it. Maybe the reason is that there wasn't much of a change. Semel will remain as chairman, albeit in a non-executive role, and the other two, Decker and Yang -- names we've known for quite some time -- will be promoted. Perhaps looking outside of Yahoo! for the CEO, as Anthony Noto of Goldman Sachs suggested, would have been the better alternative. At least some fresh ideas and viewpoints would have been brought in.<br /><br />There were several questions about capex, but Jerry and Sue gave no news of acquisitions or impending partnerships or inclinations to do either. There was talk of challenges, especially slower growth in display advertising, and allusion to Google's dominance. Even as Jerry said Panama was performing beyond their expectations and Yahoo! may outperform in Q2, revenue is seen in the lower half of the previous outlook.<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/06/18/yahoo-s-webcast-was-dull-and-unispiring/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Yahoo!'s webcast was dull and uninspiring</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/06/18/yahoo-s-webcast-was-dull-and-unispiring/">Yahoo!'s webcast was dull and uninspiring</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 18 Jun 2007 18:35:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/06/18/yahoo-s-webcast-was-dull-and-unispiring/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/920999/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/06/18/yahoo-s-webcast-was-dull-and-unispiring/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>jerry yang</category><category>JerryYang</category><category>sue decker</category><category>SueDecker</category><category>terry semel</category><category>TerrySemel</category><category>yahoo!</category><category>yhoo</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Melly Alazraki]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 18 Jun 2007 18:35:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Susan Decker passed over for Yahoo! CEO role: Always the bridesmaid]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/06/18/susan-decker-passed-over-for-yahoo-ceo-role-always-the-bridesm/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/06/18/susan-decker-passed-over-for-yahoo-ceo-role-always-the-bridesm/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/06/18/susan-decker-passed-over-for-yahoo-ceo-role-always-the-bridesm/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/bad-news/" rel="tag">Bad News</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/management/" rel="tag">Management</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/rants-and-raves/" rel="tag">Rants and Raves</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/yhoo/" rel="tag">Yahoo! (YHOO)</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/06/suedeckerg_240.jpg" alt="" />If I were Susan Decker, I'd be rollicked with mixed emotions. On one hand, the <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/06/18/terry-semel-resigns-yahoo-founder-jerry-yang-takes-over/">long-awaited exit of Terry Semel</a> as <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/yahoo-inc/yhoo/nas">Yahoo!</a> Inc. (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/yahoo-inc/yhoo/nas">YHOO</a>) CEO gives Sue a lot of room to get on with her company's renovation. She's often been seen as Yahoo!'s strongest leader and most talented executive; Semel's resignation really makes the company hers in a way it never could be before. In December, her <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/12/05/yahoo-gets-reorg-rosensweig-out-susan-decker-gets-blessed/">promotion to </a>Executive Vice President, Head of Advertiser and Publisher Group made her the heir apparent. And she's been named President, surely a lovely title reminiscent of ultimate power.<br /><br />But on the other hand, this is a corporation, and the <em>real</em> power is in the position of Chief Executive Officer -- the job we all know she should (if she has half the ambition she seems) truly desire. Not only that, but the rest of the world agrees she's the best candidate for the position. This perfect opportunity to give her the title for which her career has been grooming her? It's been passed over, and we all have to wonder: <em>what were they thinking?</em> and, <em>will she ever be the bride?</em> and, if you were her, <em>wouldn't you be updating your profile on HotJobs about now?<br /></em><br />Every deep discussion of the Semel resignation contains the same perplexed question. Various answers to the <em>why not Sue?</em> conundrum include "<a href="http://valleywag.com/tech/yahoo/jerry-yang-is-no-steve-jobs-269946.php">because she's not an outsider</a>" and "I just don't know." Could it be because she doesn't have the coding geek background? Because she's a woman? Or is the board really (as many suggest, but I don't buy) just biding their time until ... something ... to name her CEO?<br /><br />Come on. If Susan was going to be named CEO, <strong>now would be the time</strong>. Why put off any longer? If the board really was happy with her in the role, the job would be hers, effective immediately. Last time they reorganized the entire company to give her a new-and-improved title. This one, to me, says "you know honey, maybe you're just not CEO <em>material</em>." What do <em>you </em>think?<br /><br /><div class="postgallery"><p><strong>Gallery: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/photos/the-faces-of-yahoo/">The faces of Yahoo</a></strong></p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/photos/the-faces-of-yahoo/281456/"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/06/blake_jorgensen_yahoo_thumbnail.jpg" alt="Blake Jorgensen, CFO" title="Blake Jorgensen, CFO" /></a><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/photos/the-faces-of-yahoo/281453/"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/06/david_filo_yahoo_thumbnail.jpg" alt="David Filo, Co-founder" title="David Filo, Co-founder" /></a><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/photos/the-faces-of-yahoo/281452/"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/06/jerry_yang_yahoo_thumbnail.jpg" alt="Jerry Yang, CEO" title="Jerry Yang, CEO" /></a><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/photos/the-faces-of-yahoo/281450/"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/06/susan_decker_yahoo_thumbnail.jpg" alt="Susan Decker, President" title="Susan Decker, President" /></a><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/photos/the-faces-of-yahoo/281449/"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/06/terry_semel_yahoo_thumbnail.jpg" alt="Terry Semel, former CEO" title="Terry Semel, former CEO" /></a></div><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/06/18/susan-decker-passed-over-for-yahoo-ceo-role-always-the-bridesm/">Susan Decker passed over for Yahoo! CEO role: Always the bridesmaid</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 18 Jun 2007 18:30:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/06/18/susan-decker-passed-over-for-yahoo-ceo-role-always-the-bridesm/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/920928/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/06/18/susan-decker-passed-over-for-yahoo-ceo-role-always-the-bridesm/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>ceo</category><category>decker</category><category>decker ceo</category><category>DeckerCeo</category><category>poor sue</category><category>PoorSue</category><category>semel</category><category>semel quits</category><category>semel resignation</category><category>semel resigns</category><category>SemelQuits</category><category>SemelResignation</category><category>SemelResigns</category><category>sue</category><category>sue decker</category><category>SueDecker</category><category>susan</category><category>susan decker</category><category>SusanDecker</category><category>terry semel</category><category>TerrySemel</category><category>yahoo</category><category>yahoo!</category><category>yahoo! ceo</category><category>Yahoo!Ceo</category><category>yhoo</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Sarah Gilbert]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 18 Jun 2007 18:30:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Yahoo should avoid Dow Jones buyout battle as it fixes company]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/06/18/yahoo-should-avoid-dow-jones-buyout-battle-as-it-fixes-company/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/06/18/yahoo-should-avoid-dow-jones-buyout-battle-as-it-fixes-company/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/06/18/yahoo-should-avoid-dow-jones-buyout-battle-as-it-fixes-company/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/from-the-boards/" rel="tag">From the Boards</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/press-releases/" rel="tag">Press Releases</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/goog/" rel="tag">Google (GOOG)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/marketing-and-advertising/" rel="tag">Marketing and Advertising</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/employees/" rel="tag">Employees</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/nok/" rel="tag">Nokia Corp. (NOK)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/ggg/" rel="tag">Graco Inc (GGG)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/nws/" rel="tag">News Corp'B' (NWS)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/dj/" rel="tag">Dow Jones and Co (DJ)</a></p><p><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/yahoo-inc/yhoo/nas">Yahoo Inc.</a> (NASDAQ;<a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/yahoo-inc/yhoo/nas"> YHOO</a>), which today replaced <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/06/18/terry-semel-resigns-yahoo-founder-jerry-yang-takes-over/">Terry Semel as chief executive</a> with co-founder Jerry Yang, may be dragged into the battle royale for <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/dow-jones-and-company-inc/dj/nys">Dow Jones &amp; Co.</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/dow-jones-and-company-inc/dj/nys">DJ</a>).</p>
<p>Billionaire Ron Burkle, who the unions have enlisted to save them from the evil clutches of <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/news-corporation/nws/nys">News Corp</a> (NYSE:<a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/news-corporation/nws/nys">NWS</a>) Chief Executive Rupert Murdoch, is trying to convinced the Internet giant to join him in a bid for the owner of the <em>Wall Street Journal</em>, according to<em><a href="http://money.cnn.com/2007/06/18/news/companies/pluggedin_arango_dj.fortune/index.htm?postversion=2007061814"> Fortune</a></em>.</p>
<p>Why the unions think the Burkle is a such a good guy is a little baffling. The supermarket mogul won't get many Christmas cards from shareholders since, as a member of Yahoo's compensation committee, he helped Semel get his outrageous $70 million pay package. </p>
<p>Yahoo should tell Burkle to take a hike. The company's whole strategy has been based on the fact that it DOESN'T NEED TO OWN CONTENT. Executives have made this point to me in person. They've made this point to other journalists. They've made this point to Wall Street analysts. Most importantly, though, Yahoo has made this point to content providers who are nervous about the small amount of original content that the company does produce.</p>
<p>Joining the bidding war for Dow Jones makes no sense for Yahoo. The company has plenty of problems of its own, including how to diplomatically <a href="http://money.aol.com/news/articles/_a/semel-resigns-as-yahoo-ceo/20070618164809990001">shove Semel out of the door</a>. The theory is that he can do less damage as chairman, until he's given the chance to make a graceful exit, while Jerry Yang gets his feet wet as chief executive.</p>
<p>Susan Decker, who gained kudos on Wall Street during her tenure as CFO, would have made a better choice. She has become president and it wouldn't surprise me if she eventually left the company as well.</p>
<p>Yang has a tough road ahead to convince both Internet users and investors enamored of <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/google-inc-cl-a/goog/nas">Google Inc.</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/google-inc-cl-a/goog/nas">GOOG</a>) that Yahoo still is relevant. </p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/06/18/yahoo-should-avoid-dow-jones-buyout-battle-as-it-fixes-company/">Yahoo should avoid Dow Jones buyout battle as it fixes company</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 18 Jun 2007 17:33:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://money.cnn.com/2007/06/18/news/companies/pluggedin_arango_dj.fortune/index.htm?postversion=2007061814>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href=http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&amp;sid=aLzrKhKdDJGU&amp;refer=home>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/06/18/yahoo-should-avoid-dow-jones-buyout-battle-as-it-fixes-company/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/920909/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/06/18/yahoo-should-avoid-dow-jones-buyout-battle-as-it-fixes-company/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>dj</category><category>goog</category><category>jerry yang</category><category>JerryYang</category><category>nws</category><category>ron burkle</category><category>RonBurkle</category><category>rupert murdoch</category><category>RupertMurdoch</category><category>susan decker</category><category>SusanDecker</category><category>terry semel</category><category>TerrySemel</category><category>yhoo</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jonathan Berr]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 18 Jun 2007 17:33:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Yahoo dumps Semel. What took so long?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/06/18/what-took-yahoo-so-long-to-dump-semel/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/06/18/what-took-yahoo-so-long-to-dump-semel/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/06/18/what-took-yahoo-so-long-to-dump-semel/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/management/" rel="tag">Management</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/msft/" rel="tag">Microsoft (MSFT)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/yhoo/" rel="tag">Yahoo! (YHOO)</a></p><p><img alt="" hspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/06/yahoo_round_victor_240.jpg" align="right" vspace="4" border="0" />Finally, <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/yahoo-inc/yhoo/nas">Yahoo! Inc.</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/yahoo-inc/yhoo/nas">YHOO</a>) has ditched its CEO Terry Semel, according to <a href="http://www.marketwatch.com/news/story/yahoo-names-co-founder-yang-chief/story.aspx?guid=%7B7E13B573%2D423F%2D4FB7%2D8EA5%2D38BDE1947CDB%7D&amp;dist=TQP_Mod_mktwN">MarketWatch</a>. And the new CEO is Jerry Yang, a co-founder of the company. Former CFO, Susan Decker was named president, positioning her for a chance to take over the top slot.</p>
<p>It is beyond me why Semel held onto his job for so long. He helped stabilize Yahoo after the dot-com crash but has stumbled from one incompetent quarter to the next for years. And he has taken home some truly outrageous pay -- a total of <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB118219842638839488.html?mod=home_whats_news_us">$452 million</a> in salary, bonus and stock-option exercises since April 2001 [subscription] -- during which time Yahoo stock has risen four-fold. </p>
<p>However, in the last year the disconnect between Semel's pay and Yahoo's performance became too much to take. According to the <em><a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2007/06/19/technology/19yahoo.html?pagewanted=2&amp;hp">New York Times</a></em>, his total 2006 pay was $107.5 million during which time Yahoo's stock fell 35%. And directors concluded Yahoo was just not catching up fast enough with <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/google-inc-cl-a/goog/nas">Google, Inc.</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/google-inc-cl-a/goog/nas">GOOG</a>) so Semel had to go.</p>
<p>Susan Decker had been positioned to take over the company as CEO. But Yahoo's board probably decided that she was not yet ready. However, she is considered to have the inside track during the CEO search to replace Semel. So Yang's appointment could be just a temporary move that will help stabilize the company until she is ready.</p>
<p>Or, with the stock up 8% to $29.62 in after-hours trading, he might just sell it. It would make a nice morsel for <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/microsoft-corporation/msft/nas">Microsoft Corporation</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/microsoft-corporation/msft/nas">MSFT</a>).</p>
<p><em>Peter Cohan is president of</em> <a href="http://petercohan.com/"><em>Peter S. Cohan &amp; Associates</em></a><em>, a management consulting and venture capital firm. He also </em><a href="http://www3.babson.edu/Academics/Divisions/management/facultyprofile.cfm?pageid=391236"><em>teaches management at Babson College</em></a><em> and edits </em><a href="http://petercohan.blogspot.com/2007/01/cohan-letter-up-15-in-2006.html"><em>The Cohan Letter</em></a><em>. He has no financial interest in the securities mentioned in this post.</em></p>
<p>[See our <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/06/18/yahoo-ceo-semel-resigning-liveblogging-the-webcast/">live blog of the web cast in which Terry Semel discusses his resignation here</a>.]<br /></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/06/18/what-took-yahoo-so-long-to-dump-semel/">Yahoo dumps Semel. What took so long?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 18 Jun 2007 17:04:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/06/18/what-took-yahoo-so-long-to-dump-semel/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/920867/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/06/18/what-took-yahoo-so-long-to-dump-semel/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>ceo</category><category>corporate leadership</category><category>CorporateLeadership</category><category>decker</category><category>fire semel</category><category>fired</category><category>FireSemel</category><category>jerry yang</category><category>JerryYang</category><category>management</category><category>semel</category><category>semel fired</category><category>semel quits</category><category>semel resigns</category><category>SemelFired</category><category>SemelQuits</category><category>SemelResigns</category><category>susan decker</category><category>SusanDecker</category><category>terry semel</category><category>TerrySemel</category><category>yahoo ceo</category><category>yahoo! ceo</category><category>Yahoo!Ceo</category><category>YahooCeo</category><category>yang</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Peter Cohan]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 18 Jun 2007 17:04:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Yahoo! CEO Semel resigning - Liveblogging the webcast]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/06/18/yahoo-ceo-semel-resigning-liveblogging-the-webcast/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/06/18/yahoo-ceo-semel-resigning-liveblogging-the-webcast/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/06/18/yahoo-ceo-semel-resigning-liveblogging-the-webcast/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/good-news/" rel="tag">Good news</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/management/" rel="tag">Management</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/live-coverage/" rel="tag">Live Coverage</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/yhoo/" rel="tag">Yahoo! (YHOO)</a></p><img alt="" hspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/06/yahoo_y_victor_240.jpg" align="right" vspace="4" border="0" />Okay, so we all know by now that <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/yahoo-inc/yhoo/nas">Yahoo! Inc.</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/yahoo-inc/yhoo/nas">YHOO</a>) CEO <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/06/18/terry-semel-resigns-yahoo-founder-jerry-yang-takes-over/">Terry Semel has resigned</a>. Co-founder Jerry Yang will become CEO and Sue Decker the President. The call has just started, please refresh.<br /><br /><strong>4:50</strong>: Jerry Yang is speaking. Terry, Jerry and Sue will first discuss the management changes, then give a brief business update. Wonder what that would be.<br /><br />Terry started talking. In his slow drawl he says how proud he was working at Yahoo! and with Sue and Jerry (sure, what else he would say!).<br /><br />Now he explains why now. He wanted to leave sooner rather than later and this way he ensures a smooth transition.<br /><br />Now he says how Yahoo! had a difficult and challenging year. Is it me, or does his voice wavered a little?<br /><br />Speaking of Jerry, Terry says Jerry brings phenomenal skills (he has a hard time speaking, I think).<br /><br />Now he says how Sue has deserved this promotion. Her financial skills.<br /><br />Jerry and Sue will be an unbeatable team and it is the right time to do it.<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/06/18/yahoo-ceo-semel-resigning-liveblogging-the-webcast/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Yahoo! CEO Semel resigning - Liveblogging the webcast</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/06/18/yahoo-ceo-semel-resigning-liveblogging-the-webcast/">Yahoo! CEO Semel resigning - Liveblogging the webcast</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 18 Jun 2007 16:50:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/06/18/yahoo-ceo-semel-resigning-liveblogging-the-webcast/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/920878/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/06/18/yahoo-ceo-semel-resigning-liveblogging-the-webcast/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>jerry yang</category><category>JerryYang</category><category>sue decker</category><category>SueDecker</category><category>susan decker</category><category>SusanDecker</category><category>terry semel</category><category>TerrySemel</category><category>yahoo</category><category>yahoo!</category><category>yhoo</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Melly Alazraki]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 18 Jun 2007 16:50:00 EST</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
