So far, however, there has been nothing but lame excuses. In truth it is silly to ask them how they could give such risky investment instruments their highest ratings, because in truth there are no good answers. They should not have done so.
It reminds me of a comedy skit Bill Cosby did years ago when he wondered out loud why we ask our kids certain questions like, "why did you hit your brother with that baseball bat?" and then quizzed, "Is there an answer that would make you happy? Is there something the child could say that would satisfy you?" Of course not, and the same is true now with the ratings companies.I have already done my rant about this topic in Subprime = Triple-A ratings? or 'How to Lie with Statistics', but there is always more.



