True entrepreneurs will go to any length to get their companies off the ground. And, they're known for accepting the consequences of the risks they take. Some businesses never make it to launch, never bring in a dime, never lead to that killer IPO. In even rarer cases, these adventures can put two people behind the defendants' table on charges of corporate espionage. Lan Lee, an American, and Yuefei Ge, a Chinese citizen, allegedly swiped computer chip blueprints and tried to gain Chinese government support for a startup using these illicit goods. Now, they could face up to 65 years on charges of corporate espionage.

French bank Société Générale says that it has uncovered a "fraud" by a single trader which lost the bank $7.1 billion. According to MarketWatch, the fraudulent trades were made in 2007 and 2008. The trader, whose role at the bank was to make "plain vanilla" hedges on European stock-market indexes, used his knowledge of the bank's control procedures "to conceal these positions through a scheme of elaborate fictitious transactions."

Société Générale plans to raise €5.5 billion to help offset the loss.

The French bank did not disclose much about how the loss happened or what the trader's motivation might have been. Perhaps that does not matter. What does matter is the the actions get to the heart of risk management at big banks. At a number of U.S. financial companies, traders clearly took huge positions in subprime instruments. That has cost some of the largest banks in this country billions in write-offs. No one has offered an adequate explanation of who was minding the store when those risky decisions were made.

The Société Générale news is just more of the same. Managements at big banks have not learned the lesson.

Douglas A. McIntyre is an editor at 247wallst.com.

The Associated Press reports that France's second-largest bank by market capitalization, Societe Generale, has uncovered a rogue trader who reportedly stole $7.14 billion -- forcing the bank to raise $8.02 billion and suspending trading in its stock on the Paris stock exchange.

Details are sketchy. The bank discovered the fraud on January 19 and 20th. It said a trader at the futures desk had misled investors in 2007 and 2008 through a "scheme of elaborate fictitious transactions." The trader used his knowledge of the group's security systems to conceal his fraudulent positions. The unnamed trader beats Nicholas Leeson, whose 1995 $1.38 billion trading fraud in Singapore brought down Barings Bank and was made into a movie.

Societe General, whose stock has lost about half its value over the last six months, has already taken a $3 billion charge for bad subprime mortgages. No word on what happened to the trader's $7 billion -- or whether this discovery will have repercussions throughout the global financial markets.

Peter Cohan is President of Peter S. Cohan & Associates. He also teaches management at Babson College and edits The Cohan Letter.

A New Zealand brewer that had a laptop stolen has come up with an interesting way to get it back: Free beer for life!

Croucher Brewing, a New Zealand microbrewery, had its laptop stolen as a result of what the owner called "opportunistic kids and a flimsy padlock".

Assuming it was kids who stole the laptop, it should be returned for the beer sometime very soon. The owner estimates the value of the beer at around $19,500, but it could be considerably more for a strapping frat boy. Either way, the owner says its worth it because the laptop contains all the company's accounting data and label designs for future products.

Since it doesn't appear to have been returned yet, it seems likely that the kid who stole it has already sold it. If so, he will remember his crime everytime he buys a beer for the rest of his life. That could be worse punishment than a jail sentence.

Home Depot's (NYSE: HD) shoplifting policy was exposed today in a blog post by Brian White. Brian details a story wherein Home Depot employees have been summarily dismissed from employment for pursuing shoplifters and assisting police in apprehending them. On its face the situation seems stupid and illogical, but there are some things we need to consider.

First off, when a person is employed by any company, it is a condition of employment that the individual abide by the policies of the company. That's pretty straightforward thinking. It's not an issue of public sentiment. If the company that hires you tells you that policy dictates you hand the keys to the store to anyone who asks for them, you are bound by that policy and your job depends on that. Home Depot policy is clear and concise. Employees are not to interfere with shoplifters. Even the in-house security employees are instructed that way. Home Depot has its reasons for putting that policy in place.

So is this a license to steal? Perhaps it is, but there are some things that can be done about it. I have one idea that I'd institute immediately. If Home Depot was mine to secure and protect, each employee would be instructed in the ways to take hi-resolution video recordings of shoplifting occurrences. Video cameras would be accessible and ready in strategic locations so if shoplifting was detected, a video record could be made of the person, item(s), and the means of departure. Employees would be instructed to smile and wave at the perpetrators while getting nice clear records of their faces and the goods they have allegedly stolen. The resulting video recording could then be handed over to the security detail for determination if the police should be called.

When you couple a video recording with a sworn statement by a witness, you then provide the police with reasonable suspicion and they can easily pursue the matter further. To chase the alleged perpetrators yourself is a recipe for disaster. Even if they're guilty beyond any question and they've taken thousands of dollars in merchandise, if they fall on their faces while you're chasing them, it's your butt that's going to be in the wringer.

Sad but true.

Last week, the Transportation Security Administration became aware that an employee lost an external hard drive containing employment records of 100,000 TSA employees from January 2002 through August 2005.

Oops.

The data, which included names, social security numbers, dates of birth, payroll information and bank account routing information, among other things, was discovered missing from the TSA Headquarters Office of Human Capital. The names included various personnel and even U.S. Sky Marshals.

I'm not going to discuss how this puts our Sky Marshals, the travel industry and the American public at great risk, but you all know the potential Pandora's Box that was just opened.

While the TSA notified the FBI and Secret Service to help find the lost hard drive, they failed to notify their workers with as much haste.

If you didn't know by now, the TSA, a division of the Homeland Security Department, is responsible for the security of the nation's transportation system, including airports and train stations. The TSA has not yet mastered protecting computer hardware and their employee's private information.

Despite the fact that the TSA claims it follows strict data protection laws and has "zero tolerance for employees not following policies on data protection," they still earned a D in computer security from the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform. To make things even worse, 2006 was the first year the Department of Homeland Security scored a passing grade.

This past Monday, the Washington Post scolded the TSA and the government saying, "This is getting ridiculous," and "... Uncle Sam's track record is horrendous."

But the TSA is not the only government organization losing things.

• The IRS lost 490 laptops during 2003-2006, many with unencrypted data
  

• The U.S. Department of Transportation lost a laptop with the personal information of 133,000 Florida residents in July of 2006.

• Personal data from 26.5 million U.S. military veterans was stolen from a Department of Veteran Affairs data analyst who took information home last May (The data was later recovered).

• The U.S. Census Bureau and the Department of Agriculture exposed 63,000 farmers to Identity theft last month.

For additional security breaches from the government see here.

It's true that most Americans worry about identity theft. If you happen to be one of the victims that I mentioned above, or fear that your own identity is at risk, Crediteria.com has a great worksheet for you.