<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd">
<channel>
<title>BloggingStocks</title>
<link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com</link>
<description>BloggingStocks</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA['Dark Knight' box-office receipts top $1 billion ]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/22/dark-knight-box-office-receipts-top-1-billion/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/22/dark-knight-box-office-receipts-top-1-billion/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/22/dark-knight-box-office-receipts-top-1-billion/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/twx/" rel="tag">Time Warner (TWX)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/film/" rel="tag">Film</a></p><p><a href="http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3506/3190910032_3ff75544cb_m.jpg" target="_blank"><img height="163" alt="" hspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2009/02/dark-knight.jpg" width="200" align="right" vspace="4" border="1" /></a>Released last July, <em>The Dark Knight</em> -- the second installment in director Christopher Nolan's latest adaptation of the Batman mythology -- continues to score box-office dollars. Distributed by Warner Brothers, a subsidiary of <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/time-warner-inc/twx/nys">Time Warner Inc.</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/time-warner-inc/twx/nys" target="_blank">TWX</a>), the movie crossed the <a href="http://www.eonline.com/uberblog/b101032_dark_knight_breaks_billion.html" target="_blank">$1 billion</a> mark late Friday, joining an elite quartet to pass this high-water mark. </p>
<p>Leading the list of top all-time box office grosses are <em>Titanic </em>($1.84B), <em>Lord of the Rings: The Return of the King </em>($1.12B), and <em>Pirates of the Caribbean: Dead Man's Chest </em>($1.07B).</p>
<p>More than half of <em>Dark Knight</em>'s box-office dough ($533.1 million, to be specific) was earned domestically, while $468 million was collected from overseas theaters. Movie-watchers were driven to the theaters in droves due to stellar reviews, positive reaction to its predecessor (<em>Batman Begins) </em>and the shocking and premature death of costar Heath Ledger, who died last January.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/22/dark-knight-box-office-receipts-top-1-billion/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>'Dark Knight' box-office receipts top $1 billion </em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/22/dark-knight-box-office-receipts-top-1-billion/">'Dark Knight' box-office receipts top $1 billion </a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Sun, 22 Feb 2009 11:40:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/22/dark-knight-box-office-receipts-top-1-billion/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1467565/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/22/dark-knight-box-office-receipts-top-1-billion/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>christopher nolan</category><category>heath ledger</category><category>inthenews</category><category>oscars</category><category>the dark knight</category><category>time warner</category><category>titanic</category><category>twx</category><category>warner bros</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Beth Gaston Moon]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 22 Feb 2009 11:40:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Should film studios always spread the risk?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/02/29/should-film-studios-always-spread-the-risk/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/02/29/should-film-studios-always-spread-the-risk/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/02/29/should-film-studios-always-spread-the-risk/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/ge/" rel="tag">General Electric (GE)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/twx/" rel="tag">Time Warner (TWX)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/dis/" rel="tag">Walt Disney (DIS)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/via/" rel="tag">Viacom (VIA)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/nws/" rel="tag">News Corp'B' (NWS)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/film/" rel="tag">Film</a></p><p><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/general-electric-company/ge/nys"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/11/hollywood-sign.jpg" alt="" />General Electric</a>'s (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/general-electric-company/ge/nys">GE</a>) Universal Pictures asset received some good news the other day -- 75% of the studio's movie projects for the next few years will be funded, in part, by a financing entity known as Relativity Capital. According to <em><a href="http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/hr/content_display/news/e3i4e4b94c11d15b8f2e61b0aa6eb4af83c">The Hollywood Reporter</a></em>, the deal calls for Relativity to help cover production costs, but not marketing programs; it could see about $500 million spread out over as many as 45 movies. Also, this is being described as a bona fide partnership -- not only will Relativity share in profits generated by ancillary channels, such as home video and television sales, but it will also have the power to co-greenlight a project, and it will be able to review the talent and budget attached to each project. </p>
<p>Financing by hedge funds and private equity is certainly not new in Hollywood; it's been around for a long time. So has the practice of selling off international rights and partnerships between studio competitors. Remember James Cameron's <em>Titanic</em>? It took the studio segments of both <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/viacom-inc-cl-a/via/nys?tabs=quotesandnews">Viacom</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/viacom-inc-cl-a/via/nys?tabs=quotesandnews">VIA</a>) and <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/news-corporation/nws/nys?tabs=quotesandnews">News Corp.</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/news-corporation/nws/nys?tabs=quotesandnews">NWS</a>) to shoulder that costly celluloid endeavor. But, although I recognize that filmmaking is extremely risky, and that a flop is very much in the cards whether or not big stars are in a film, I also have to wonder if it might be better for studios to simply lessen their risk by making much cheaper movies and foregoing the distribution of risk. What's my beef with distribution of risk? Well, I'm not the first to say this, and it's pretty obvious at any rate: hedge your bet, and you also limit your upside score in terms of a windfall. </p>
<br />
<p><em></em></p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/02/29/should-film-studios-always-spread-the-risk/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Should film studios always spread the risk?</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/02/29/should-film-studios-always-spread-the-risk/">Should film studios always spread the risk?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 29 Feb 2008 15:28:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/02/29/should-film-studios-always-spread-the-risk/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1127735/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/02/29/should-film-studios-always-spread-the-risk/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>co-financing movie deals</category><category>Co-financingMovieDeals</category><category>General Electric</category><category>GeneralElectric</category><category>inthenews</category><category>James Cameron</category><category>JamesCameron</category><category>Relativity Capital</category><category>RelativityCapital</category><category>Titanic</category><category>Universal Pictures</category><category>UniversalPictures</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Steven Mallas]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 29 Feb 2008 15:28:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[95 years later, The Titanic still commands attention and dollars]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/07/03/95-years-later-the-titanic-still-commands-attention-and-dollars/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/07/03/95-years-later-the-titanic-still-commands-attention-and-dollars/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/07/03/95-years-later-the-titanic-still-commands-attention-and-dollars/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/internet/" rel="tag">Internet</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/via/" rel="tag">Viacom (VIA)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/nws/" rel="tag">News Corp'B' (NWS)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/rich-in-america/" rel="tag">Rich in America</a></p><img height="184" alt="" hspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/07/titanic.jpg" width="240" align="right" vspace="4" border="0" />In April 1912, the RMS Titanic, a luxury passenger liner billed as unsinkable, took its maiden voyage and was felled by an iceberg. Lifeboats were scarce, and more than 1,500 passengers perished in the icy seas of the North Atlantic. The tragic irony of the surrounding circumstances are fit for a movie ... but we'll get to that later. <br /><br />A Christie's auction in New York City last week <a href="http://news.aol.com/story/_a/titanic-auction-in-nyc-includes-teen/n20070629163509990006">featured memorabilia</a> from the ill-fated voyage, including a lengthy handwritten description of the ordeal, penned by a 16-year-old survivor. The account, which mentions witnessing the "most terrible shrieks and groans from the helpless and doomed" from her perch in a lifeboat, attracted $16,800. The auction featured 18 lots in total, including telegrams, letters, and deck logs. In all, the products fetched $193,140. An original list of the first-class passengers aboard the ship fetched $48,000, surpassing pre-sale estimates. <br /><br />Sunday night, flipping through cable stations, I came across James Cameron's epic blockbuster tribute to the sunken ship, which was released by <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/news-corporation/nws/nys?tabs=quotesandnews">News Corp.'s</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/news-corporation/nws/nys?tabs=quotesandnews">NWS</a>) 20th Century Fox and <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/viacom-inc-cl-a/via/nys">Viacom's</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/viacom-inc-cl-a/via/nys">VIA</a>) Paramount Pictures almost 10 years ago. It remains the highest-grossing film of all time, with worldwide box office receipts of over $1.8 billion. <br /><br />I'll admit, with mild sheepishness, that I was among the throng of <em>Titanic </em>devotees that took multiple trips to the theater (my count was five) to follow the story of Jack and Rose. While it's a rare moment that I pull out my DVD to spend more than 3 hours in anticipation of a teary finale, it's still a good movie, made great through the performances of Leonardo DiCaprio and Kate Winslet before they were superstars. <br /><br /><em><em>Beth Gaston Moon is an analyst at </em><a href="http://www.schaeffersresearch.com/"><em>Schaeffer's Investment Research</em></a><em>.</em></em><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/07/03/95-years-later-the-titanic-still-commands-attention-and-dollars/">95 years later, The Titanic still commands attention and dollars</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 03 Jul 2007 13:50:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://news.aol.com/story/_a/titanic-auction-in-nyc-includes-teen/n20070629163509990006>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/07/03/95-years-later-the-titanic-still-commands-attention-and-dollars/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/932252/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/07/03/95-years-later-the-titanic-still-commands-attention-and-dollars/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>20th century fox</category><category>20thCenturyFox</category><category>auctions</category><category>christy's auction house</category><category>Christy'sAuctionHouse</category><category>james cameron</category><category>JamesCameron</category><category>kate winslet</category><category>KateWinslet</category><category>leonardo dicaprio</category><category>LeonardoDicaprio</category><category>nws</category><category>paramount pictures</category><category>ParamountPictures</category><category>titanic</category><category>via</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Beth Gaston Moon]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 03 Jul 2007 13:50:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[James Cameron finds Jesus ... No, not like that]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/02/27/james-cameron-finds-jesus-no-not-like-that/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/02/27/james-cameron-finds-jesus-no-not-like-that/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/02/27/james-cameron-finds-jesus-no-not-like-that/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/rumors/" rel="tag">Rumors</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/internet/" rel="tag">Internet</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/scandals/" rel="tag">Scandals</a></p><img width="160" vspace="4" hspace="4" height="227" border="0" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/02/jesus.jpg" alt="" />Remember when James Cameron directed the <em>Terminator </em>movies and he was unequivocally <span style="">regarded as awesome? Then he made this little period piece about some <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Titanic_%281997_film%29">boat</a> sinking, proclaimed himself "King of the World," which was perceived as arrogant but was really just a <em>quote</em>, traded in <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Suzy_Amis">wives</a>, and was never really heard from for nearly a decade. <br /><br />So what's the best way to move back into the limelight? <a href="http://news.aol.com/topnews/articles/_a/debate-of-biblical-proportions/n20070227071309990007">Find Jesus</a>. And not in the same way that Stephen Baldwin has. The Oscar-winning filmmaker said yesterday that a group of stone boxes, originally discovered two decades ago within a hillside tomb in Jerusalem, once held the remains of Jesus Christ and Mary Magdalene.</span><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/02/27/james-cameron-finds-jesus-no-not-like-that/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>James Cameron finds Jesus ... No, not like that</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/02/27/james-cameron-finds-jesus-no-not-like-that/">James Cameron finds Jesus ... No, not like that</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 27 Feb 2007 13:58:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://news.aol.com/topnews/articles/_a/debate-of-biblical-proportions/n20070227071309990007>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/02/27/james-cameron-finds-jesus-no-not-like-that/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/841707/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/02/27/james-cameron-finds-jesus-no-not-like-that/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>broadcasting</category><category>christianity</category><category>disca</category><category>discovery channel</category><category>discovery holding</category><category>DiscoveryChannel</category><category>DiscoveryHolding</category><category>James Cameron</category><category>JamesCameron</category><category>jesus christ</category><category>JesusChrist</category><category>Liberty Media</category><category>LibertyMedia</category><category>titanic</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Beth Gaston Moon]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 27 Feb 2007 13:58:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[TWX is undervalued, says CEO]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/05/22/twx-is-undervalued-says-ceo/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/05/22/twx-is-undervalued-says-ceo/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/05/22/twx-is-undervalued-says-ceo/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/forecasts/" rel="tag">Forecasts</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/twx/" rel="tag">Time Warner (TWX)</a></p><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Richard_Parsons">Richard Parsons</a> is one optimistic dude. The Time Warner CEO gave a positively rosy-hued speech at last week's shareholders meeting in Atlanta, with the reassuring statement that "our company is clearly undervalued."<span class="bodytext"><br /><br /><span class="bodytext">Among other plans, Parsons believes he can rejuvenate AOL by increasing revenue from online advertising (some of our BloggingStocks readers, meanwhile, seem to think that&nbsp; AOL's <a href="http://twx.bloggingstocks.com/2006/05/22/sign-sealed-delivered-aols-bulk-email-fees/">"certified" email program</a> is also part of the plan to jump-start AOL).</span><br /><br />And while he's made some bold moves -- slashing some 2,400 jobs, for instance -- the stock has remained relatively static.<br /><br />Is it just me, or is Parsons' cheerfulness a bit like shuffling deck chairs on the Titanic? Or is it rather -- in <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stephen_Colbert_at_the_2006_White_House_Correspondents%27_Association_Dinner">Stephen Colbert's famous phrase</a> -- like shuffling chairs on the Hindenberg?</span><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/05/22/twx-is-undervalued-says-ceo/">TWX is undervalued, says CEO</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 22 May 2006 13:50:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.nydailynews.com/business/story/419303p-354104c.html>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/05/22/twx-is-undervalued-says-ceo/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/620722/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/05/22/twx-is-undervalued-says-ceo/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>AOL</category><category>Hindenberg</category><category>Richard Parsons</category><category>RichardParsons</category><category>stephen colbert</category><category>StephenColbert</category><category>Time Warner</category><category>TimeWarner</category><category>Titanic</category><category>TWX</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Anne Metz]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 22 May 2006 13:50:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[With Titanic hopes, Warner Bros. announces Clash of the Titans remake]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/05/01/with-titanic-hopes-warner-bros-announces-clash-of-the-titans-r/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/05/01/with-titanic-hopes-warner-bros-announces-clash-of-the-titans-r/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/05/01/with-titanic-hopes-warner-bros-announces-clash-of-the-titans-r/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/products-and-services/" rel="tag">Products and Services</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/industry/" rel="tag">Industry</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/twx/" rel="tag">Time Warner (TWX)</a></p><p><img width="172" vspace="4" hspace="4" height="255" border="0" align="right" alt=""src="http://www.vroma.org/images/flood_images/medusa.jpg" />Former Latin students of the world:</p>
<p><em>Salvete</em>! I have good news!<br /><br />No, your Latin teacher didn't actually give herself a lethalpaper cut on your shoddy translation of Virgil's <em>Aeneid</em>. And, no,&nbsp;your local&nbsp;school board didn'tfinally decide that Latin was, in fact, "dead enough" to give up on trying to teach it.<br /><br />But it'salmost as good. Earlier today, Warner Bros. movie studio, a unit of Time Warner, announced plans to remake the oldLatin class stand-by <a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0082186/"><em>Clash of the Titans</em></a>. The originalfeature film, which follows the <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Codpiece">codpiece</a>-wearing hero, Perseus, ashe fights monsters and Medusa, to save the beautiful Princess Andromeda. Andromeda, in typical princess style, spendsmost of the movie chained up to a rock, waiting to be rescued by the divinely chartered hero.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/05/01/with-titanic-hopes-warner-bros-announces-clash-of-the-titans-r/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>With Titanic hopes, Warner Bros. announces Clash of the Titans remake</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/05/01/with-titanic-hopes-warner-bros-announces-clash-of-the-titans-r/">With Titanic hopes, Warner Bros. announces Clash of the Titans remake</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 01 May 2006 11:29:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.cinematical.com/2006/05/01/todays-remake-clash-of-the-titans/>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/05/01/with-titanic-hopes-warner-bros-announces-clash-of-the-titans-r/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/613663/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/05/01/with-titanic-hopes-warner-bros-announces-clash-of-the-titans-r/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>1981</category><category>B-movie</category><category>Beachem</category><category>box office</category><category>BoxOffice</category><category>celebrity</category><category>cinema</category><category>Clash of the Titans</category><category>ClashOfTheTitans</category><category>Joan Rivers</category><category>JoanRivers</category><category>Latin</category><category>Medusa</category><category>movies</category><category>Oscars</category><category>Perseus</category><category>remakes</category><category>Time Warner</category><category>TimeWarner</category><category>Titanic</category><category>Travis Beacham</category><category>TravisBeacham</category><category>TWX</category><category>Warner Bros</category><category>WarnerBros</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Anne Metz]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 01 May 2006 11:29:00 EST</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
