Today it's time to do some trimming of the fourteen stocks and four options on the contenders list. This review will prioritize the companies by price-to-book (P/B), price-to-sales (P/S) and return-on-equity (ROE). This does not preclude more possible stocks being added and the final list will not be done until the end of the month.

We will also compare recent stock prices to three-year highs to give us a relative idea where the stock floated in rosier times.

Only three weeks to go before the list of contenders are finalized into my ten picks for 2010. There were 14 before I added three more today and moved one of the stocks on the fence up, leaving another three still on the fence.

I continue to read everything I can get my hands on and recommend doing the same to anyone else seeking to do some stock picking. A lot of the recommendations I come across project possible appreciation of 10% to 15%, and that would be great, but I am seeking at least the potential to double that.

We started this review with 25 stocks of companies noted for their quality of management and how successful they have been at nurturing new leaders as presented in Fortune magazine. After running them through a serious screening process using universally agreed upon key metrics, the list has been reduced to six candidates for potential investment.

I will reiterate that there is no imperative to invest in any of them even if they might be among the best opportunities from a select list. While I think all of the original companies listed and stocks screened are well regarded that does not mean now is the right time to invest.

Regardless of the outcome of this process, and since price and timing are critical, it would be smart to create a stock watch-list with the inclusion of all six of these companies.

This is the third screening to find value among Fortune's 25 corporate world leaders that have demonstrated an ability to regenerate themselves from within. The list has been cut to 18 and will be cut further here.

The methodology of using basic stock data points to identify potential value investments only sets the stage for success -- it assures nothing. While it is true that paying less is better than paying more and getting a higher yield is better than less, this gives you a scant picture of what is in people's hearts and minds, and that is harder to judge. Like the weather, no matter the predictions, you may not find out it is raining until you are standing in it. Regardless, it should be advantageous to start with good stock (pun intended) before you take to whittlin', and that we have.

FedEx Corp. (NYSE: FDX)'s dream of entering India's domestic logistics business has failed with the withdrawal of its bid for SafeExpress, one of the largest Indian logistics companies. Had the deal been approved, it would have given FedEx quite a large chunk of the express cargo, third party logistics and warehousing segment.

Instead, FedEx wasn't willing to pay the high price that SafeExpress demanded, sources close to the deal told The Economic Times. SafeExpress founder and managing director Pawan Jain valued his company at Rs2000 crore, nearly $500 million. FedEx was willing to spend up to Rs1800 crore, or $445 million, for the Indian logistics company.

The move hurts FedEx's chances of successfully entering India's domestic logistics segment through a strategic acquisition. Competitors DHL and TNT (OTC: TNTTY) have already been successful in finding a logistics company in India, with DHL acquiring 81% of Blue Dart for Rs 730 crore, or $181 million, in 2004 and TNT's acquisition of Speedage, a division of ARC India last year, for Rs200 crore, or $50 million.

The lack of an acquisition also hurt SafeExpress, after a multitude of regional managers and operational leaders from various divisions have left the company in the past eight months, unsure of the company's future. On the topic of acquisitions, this weekend Barron's said that FedEx themselves could be a private-equity target.