<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd">
<channel>
<title>BloggingStocks</title>
<link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com</link>
<description>BloggingStocks</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[The Paycheck Challenge: Get what you're worth]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/05/12/the-paycheck-challenge-get-what-youre-worth/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/05/12/the-paycheck-challenge-get-what-youre-worth/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/05/12/the-paycheck-challenge-get-what-youre-worth/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/good-news/" rel="tag">Good news</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/management/" rel="tag">Management</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/rants-and-raves/" rel="tag">Rants and Raves</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/competitive-strategy/" rel="tag">Competitive Strategy</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/employees/" rel="tag">Employees</a></p><p>I encountered a fascinating article at Forbes.com. Writer <a href="http://www.forbes.com/2007/05/09/graduates-salary-negotiation-lead-careers-cx_tw_0508bizbasics.html?partner=leadership_newsletter">Tara Weiss brings to light</a> the fact that when accepting a new job, recruits should realize that they have a right and even a responsibility to take some initiative in negotiating their pay package. Think of it this way: After all the long hours of processing applications, reviewing resumes, and conducting interviews, if you are the individual who receives the offer for employment, that indicates you have a lot going for you. Don't be undersold. It's not an issue of pride. It's responsible economics plain and simple.</p>
<p>With the hope that you'll read Ms. Weiss's article, I'll take the proposition one step further. I submit to you that once you have become established in a job, don't let a job classification or title restrict you from asking for more. If you're not bound by the terms of a labor agreement through a union or other labor contract, then the sky's the limit, and I'm saying that you should go for it. Every employment situation offers opportunities for advancement and for income increase also. If you don't believe me, let me prove it to you.</p>
<p>The company I work for is historically tight-fisted when it comes to employee compensation. It's not that we don't generate enough profit to justify pay raises, but as a subsidiary of a larger entity that provides the lion's share of our workload, accounting is "manipulated" to push the profit up to the parent company. This is simple to prove when given the fact that, in a responsible business sense, any company that shows the minimal profit we do would be immediately shut down and those capital assets would be put to work elsewhere. This makes it tough for a guy like me to get ahead. I, however, applied a strategy that has performed for me all of my working years, and which is encompassed in the following ideal:</p>
<p><em><strong>I don't work for my employer, I work for me. It's all about my own bottom line.</strong></em></p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/05/12/the-paycheck-challenge-get-what-youre-worth/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>The Paycheck Challenge: Get what you're worth</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/05/12/the-paycheck-challenge-get-what-youre-worth/">The Paycheck Challenge: Get what you're worth</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Sat, 12 May 2007 08:40:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/05/12/the-paycheck-challenge-get-what-youre-worth/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/893312/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/05/12/the-paycheck-challenge-get-what-youre-worth/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>best</category><category>company</category><category>compensation</category><category>contract</category><category>earn</category><category>earnings</category><category>employer</category><category>employment</category><category>invest</category><category>negotiate</category><category>pay</category><category>raise</category><category>returns</category><category>strategy</category><category>Tara Weiss</category><category>TaraWeiss</category><category>top</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Gary Sattler]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 12 May 2007 08:40:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Integrity still translates as "Money in the bank"]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/04/03/integrity-still-translates-as-money-in-the-bank/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/04/03/integrity-still-translates-as-money-in-the-bank/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/04/03/integrity-still-translates-as-money-in-the-bank/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/good-news/" rel="tag">Good news</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/management/" rel="tag">Management</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/law/" rel="tag">Law</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/rants-and-raves/" rel="tag">Rants and Raves</a></p><p>I was privileged to read an article in my latest <a href="http://www.forbes.com/2007/03/26/companies-accounting-governance-lead-cx_pm_0327trustyintro.html?partner=leadership_newsletter">Forbes newsletter</a> which addresses honesty in business practice. Most especially, the article points out the inherent value that clear, honest book keeping and deliberate management transparency impart upon any business. To illustrate its point, Forbes utilized the analysis of Audit Integrity, an independent Los Angeles firm that does research on corporate governance best practice (and which is a data supplier to Forbes.com). <a href="http://www.forbes.com/2007/03/26/companies-accounting-governance-lead-cx_pm_0327trusty.html">Audit Integrity developed its first list of 100 companies which exhibit the highest degree of ethical and business standards when dealing with their investors.</a></p>
<p>What brings the value of Audit Integrity's analysis closer to home is the cross reference of stock performance as relates to inclusion on the integrity list. Forbes reports that the group of 100 companies that made Audit Integrity's list of good guys provided an overall return of 33% on shares, double the return of the market on average. Forbes cites higher equity growth, reduced litigation costs and a reduction in regulatory interference as some of the reasons why the wonderful one hundred out performed their peers.</p>
<p>So, if you want to simplify your hunt for stock value and reduce your research burden, you might want to give the Audit Integrity list of 100 do gooders a long hard look. In this game of stock picking there are a lot of angles to consider. If Audit Integrity is willing and able to provide a clear pre-assessment of business integrity in such a comprehensive and easy to understand format, I think you owe it to yourself to consider the data. Investment based on information devoid of even a cursory view of honesty in business practice is investment made blind. </p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/04/03/integrity-still-translates-as-money-in-the-bank/">Integrity still translates as "Money in the bank"</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 03 Apr 2007 15:45:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/04/03/integrity-still-translates-as-money-in-the-bank/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/864940/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/04/03/integrity-still-translates-as-money-in-the-bank/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>100</category><category>accounting</category><category>Audit</category><category>business</category><category>ethics</category><category>Forbes</category><category>honest</category><category>honesty</category><category>Integrity</category><category>newsletter</category><category>performers</category><category>top</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Gary Sattler]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 03 Apr 2007 15:45:00 EST</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
