Few economists deny that the global economic order that dawns following the financial crisis will be different from the pre-crisis order.

And a key difference is likely to be consumption patterns -- namely the development and expansion of middle classes in younger economies as a source of demand.

The export economy's downside

Emerging market economies have learned/are learning an all-too-painful lesson regarding the vulnerabilities -- or the downside -- of an export-based economy: if for some reason that foreign demand wanes or dries up, your economy has a problem. A big problem.

With oil prices cut in half and gasoline near (or below) $2 per gallon, is now a good time for the U.S. to end its century-long addiction to oil?

The topic was raised by none other than the 'liberal bastion' of The Wall Street Journal Monday (subscription required0 with energy analysts and policy makers weighing in.

BloggingStocks Monday asked Energy Trader Jim Dietz to evaluate some of the major recommendations discussed.

• Four-day work week: "It's possible, but the best plan would be voluntary, allowing companies to opt in/out and adopt plans that meet their production needs," Dietz said.

• Mandated higher MPG for vehicles: "This is almost certain to be proposed by President-elect Obama, and will likely pass the Congress. It will reduce gasoline and diesel consumption."

• Mandated flex-fuel cars: "Another measure likely to become federal law and it would take pressure off oil consumption."

• Tax credit for fuel-efficient vehicles: "Another oil saver, and it stands a better than 50% chance of being passed by the next Congress."
  

• Federal funds for next-gen vehicle: "This will likely be included in any rescue package for General Motors, Ford, and Chrysler. A next-generation vehicle would be a game-changer, energy wise, but it's years away."

There have been few bright spots as the United States attempts to battle back from almost a decade of policy errors, but one positive trend continued Thursday: the trade deficit continues to decline.

The U.S trade deficit narrowed in September to $56.5 billion -- its smallest total in almost a year -- as the plunge in oil prices decreased the nation's bill for imported oil, the U.S. Commerce Department announced Thursday. Economists surveyed by Bloomberg News had expected the September trade deficit to total $57.0 billion. The trade deficit totaled $59.1 billion in August.

Imports fell a record $12.5 billion to $211.9 billion in September, while exports declined a record $9.9 billion to $155.4 billion. Further, during the past year, the real trade deficit has declined 19.7%, with real imports declining 6% and real exports dipping 2.3%.

Economist Peter Dawson said the major factor in the continued reduction in the U.S. trade gap is the plunge in oil prices, but U.S. consumer behavior also is playing a role.

Time provides the advantage of not only additional events, but also the ability to the compare these events to conditions and issues in previous eras -- an argument against 'instant-analysis' and a major reason my Ph.D. advisor said, "Don't study any public official's decisions until he or she has been dead for 20 years."

Hence, time is naturally providing more evidence and perspective on the recently-ended period of global economic growth, and increasingly the evidence is showing that it was a global economy of unsustainable imbalances -- balances that policy makers mistakenly ignored.

2001-2007: a policy void

First and probably foremost there was the oil price imbalance. Whether they were driven up by speculators, by institutional investors seeking a return on equity, global energy demand, and/or by other factors, economists had warned for years that the U.S. and global economies could not continue to grow at adequate rates with oil above $80 per barrel. In fact, every previous oil shock in the modern era was followed by a recession in the United States. Still, little was done from a policy standpoint to stem oil's price rise.

Similarly, the U.S.'s then-increasing trade deficit, a good part of which had been fed by purchases of imported oil, and the notion that U.S. consumers could serve perpetually as the growth engine of the export-oriented developing world, was unsustainable, given stagnant U.S. incomes, and its nadir savings rate. Yet little was done to address this imbalance.

What's the post-2008 U.S. Presidential Election dollar outlook and the dollar strategy?

Well, more than likely, the dollar's fate will be largely determined by macroeconomic factors, as well as by fiscal and monetary policy, along with the overall risk appetite/risk aversion climate that hinges on the status of the global financial crisis.

As any economist or currency trader will tell you, that's a full plate of variables, which only underscores the complexity (and difficulty) in determining the direction of currencies.

Nov. 4 election will help determine dollar's fate

Still, fiscal policy plays an important role, and with the aforementioned in mind, look for the following dollar pattern depending on the Tuesday, November 4 Election Day outcome: If U.S. Sen. Barack Obama, D-Illinois, wins, the dollar is likely to strengthen, long-term. If U.S. Sen. John McCain, R-Arizona, wins, the dollar is likely to weaken, long-term.

Currency Trader Eric Simpkins outlined the Obama scenario. Although U.S. budget deficits will initially be high as an Obama presidency begins, an Obama win implies a Democratic Party majority in the U.S. Congress, which will make it easier for Obama to raise taxes on upper income groups, basically those Americans earning more than $250,000 per year.

"Obama's tax increase will cut the U.S. budget deficit and get the revenue and spending lines heading in the right direction, together, which will cause the dollar to rise," Simpkins said. "The U.S. recession will mitigate this somewhat, but that economic negative will be offset by the fact that Europe and other regions will be in recession, too, and will likely recover later, putting pressure on those currencies."

Is the dollar's status as the world's reserve currency coming to an end?

It could be, if present trends driven by corrective measures taken to stem the global financial crisis continue, in the view of one monetary official.

European Central Bank council member Ewald Nowotny believes a 'tri-polar' global reserve currency system is developing among Asia, Europe and the United States.

"What I see is a system where we have more centers of gravity," Nowotny said Monday in an interview with Austrian state broadcaster ORF-TV, Bloomberg News reported Monday. "I see for the future a tri-polar development, and I don't think that there will be fixed exchange rates between these poles."

The dollar has served as the world's reserve currency for more than 30 years. A reserve currency is one which financial institutions -- and nations, for that matter -- seek to own during times of financial crisis, stress, or uncertainty. The reserve currency attracts investors in a phenomenon called a 'flight to safety.'

The euro, the currency of the euro zone, this decade has challenged the dollar's reserve currency status, following its introduction into global financial markets in 1999. (Physical euro banknotes and coins began to circulate on January 1, 2002.) A series of U.S. fiscal policy and trade policy errors, among other factors, has caused the dollar to weaken against the euro from about 82 cents per euro in 2001 to the present $1.3317 per euro.

Twenty five trillion dollars in global market capitalization wiped out. At least $500 billion -- and most likely in excess of $1 trillion added to the United States' national debt. The Fed has loaned money to corporations, added massive liquidity to banks, cut interest, and the U.S. Treasury may invest directly in private banks, if it doesn't nationalize them.

And the currency of the nation primarily responsible for the global financial crisis -- the dollar -- how has it fared?

The dollar has been firm, for the most part, even rising against the euro and British pound. However, the dollar has fallen against Japan's yen. As of Friday at 2:35 p.m. EDT, the dollar had risen 2 cents versus the euro to $1.3382 and 1.5 cents versus the pound to $1.6947, but had fallen one-half yen to 99.33.

Could the financial crisis result in the United States losing its status as the world's financial superpower?

Indeed it could, Germany's Finance Minister Peter Steinbrueck told MarketWatch.com.

"The United States will lose its status as the superpower of the global financial system, not abruptly, but it will erode," Steinbrueck said, MarketWatch.com reported. "The global financial system will become more multi-polar."

However, Steinbrueck clarified his statement in subsequent remarks to FT.com. "When we look back 10 years from now, we will see 2008 as a fundamental rupture. I am not saying the dollar will lose its reserve currency status, but it will become relative," Steinbrueck told FT.com. Further, Steinbrueck repeated Germany's refusal to allocate public funds to acquire distressed/bad assets, arguing that the crisis is mainly hitting the United States.

The U.S.: a decade of descent

Economist Richard Felson concurred with Steinbrueck's analysis for the most part, but added that the U.S.'s decline, more accurately described as "a descent," is not irreversible.

"Globalization has played a role, but much of the U.S.'s descent in the past decade stems for policy mistakes, basically policies that didn't and don't work. The nation cut taxes before it went to war, creating a large budget deficit. A lack of a forward-looking energy policy helped balloon the trade deficit. And inadequate investment in infrastructure, education, and basic research is depressing economic growth below what it should be," Felson said. "The latter resulted in far fewer jobs begin created in the decade than what's required, leading to all sorts of problems, including the housing sector's implosion. The result has been a weaker U.S. economy with more structural problems, and an inability to project economic power. Meanwhile, the economic power of China, Russia, India, and Brazil has increased. I don't think that's what policy makers intended at the start of the decade, but that's been the result."

Your take on the July U.S. trade data may very well hinge on whether you tend to see a half-glass of orange juice as a glass half-empty or half-full.

The downside: the U.S. trade deficit increased 5.7% in July to $62.2 billion, the U.S. Commerce Department announced Thursday. Economists surveyed by Bloomberg News had expected a $58.0 billion trade deficit for July.

The upside: the non-petroleum trade deficit in goods declined 9.8% to $29.6 billion -- its lowest level in six years, the Commerce Department said.

Almost all of July's trade deficit increase was due to oil. So, does the July trade statistic constitute a modest victory, or something less?

"It means the nation's trade deficit picture is improving, just as long as we don't use any oil," economist Peter Dawson said. "Kidding aside, the non-oil component of the trade deficit continues to improve, and I'm emphasizing that dimension. The oil import component should decrease provided oil prices continue to moderate and Americans continue to cutback gasoline use, so the trend line at least through Q4 is a good one for the trade deficit."

Overall in July, imports rose 3.9% to $230.3 billion, and exports increased 3.3% to $168.1 billion. Strong performance areas for exports included airplanes, machinery, auto parts, computers and industrial materials.

The comeback of the beleaguered dollar continues.

The dollar strengthened to a six-month high versus the euro Tuesday, and also rose against the world's other major currencies on a growing consensus in foreign exchange circles that global economic fundamentals are shifting in favor of the greenback.

The dollar strengthened about 1.5 cents to $1.4465 versus the euro, and about 1.4 cents to $1.7877 versus the British pound Tuesday at mid-day. The buck also gained one-half yen to 108.62 versus Japan's yen.

Pivotal for dollar: Europe, Asia GDP

Further, although Tuesday's dollar catalyst was the realization that Hurricane Gustav would cause considerably less-than-forecast damage to Southeast U.S. oil production and the refinery infrastructure, trader Andrew Resnick told BloggingStocks the longer-term focus remains regional GDP growth.

"With Hurricane Gustav out of the way, sentiment's building that this dollar rally has legs. European growth has slowed to recession levels, and China's economy has slowed as well. For Europe, lower interest rates are likely to follow, and that's dollar bullish," Resnick said. Resnick added that he expects the Bank of England to cut its benchmark interest rate by a quarter-point to 4.75% when it meets September 4. He doesn't expect the European Central Bank to lower its 4.25% refinance rate on September 4, but that stand-pat policy may change to accommodation, later this fall.

In this market and this economy, you take the good news where you can get it.

Today, we got some good news: the U.S. trade deficit narrowed in June to $56.8 billion on record exports and a dip in non-oil imports, the U.S. Commerce Department announced Tuesday. Economists surveyed by Bloomberg News had expected the June trade gap to be $61.5 billion.

Exports surged 4% in June to a record $164.4 billion, the largest gain in four years. Imports increased 1.8% to a record $221.2 billion, inflated by sky-high oil prices. Oil, which traded at about $113.65 per barrel on Tuesday at mid-day, is up about 360% since 2003.

U.S. export activity has been a silver lining in the nation's otherwise anemic economy. The trade deficit has been declining for about two years, aided by a weaker dollar and demand for products in emerging market countries.

A stronger U.S. economy in Q2?

Economist David H. Wang told BloggingStocks Tuesday the June trade deficit statistic "was a really pleasant surprise," but he still wants to lower expectations.

"The high export number is the standout, and it's one that, if it continues, implies a higher rate of GDP growth for the U.S. economy in Q2, but let's not jump the gun. Economists sense there's a global economic slowing going on, exports may have peaked as a result, so this large increase in June may prove to be transitory," Wang said.

Billionaire oilman T. Boone Pickens has launched a new campaign to substitute at least a portion of the U.S. imported oil with domestic natural gas.

Pickens would like renewable energy sources, wind power chief among them, to run electric power generation plants currently run by natural gas/coal, and use that natural gas to fuel natural gas vehicles.

Economist Glen Langan told BloggingStocks Thursday the PickensPlan is commendable for a number of reasons (it would lower the trade deficit, create domestic jobs, and decrease greenhouse gas emissions), but investors and readers should not view it as a panacea for the nation's transportation energy bill. "It could be a part of the solution, but it won't address the entire imported oil problem," Langan said.

Another oil saver: better engines

What's another key to reducing both imported oil and U.S.-produced oil consumption? Something that the U.S. auto sector has under-emphasized for more than a decade: technology-driven increases in car/vehicle efficiency, Langan said.

Langan said vehicle weight reduction, transmission/drive train improvements, enhanced aerodynamics, and the biggest factor -- increased engine efficiency -- "have the potential to reduce oil imports by almost as much as the Pickens Plan, and the changes won't take 10 years to see the results."

Further, many of the mpg-enchancing technologies already exist, Langan notes; he suggested an additional federal tax credit for automakers to help them incorporate the changes sooner.

"The fleet [all vehicles driven in the U.S.] should average 25-27 miles per gallon right now. Currently we're at about 20 miles per gallon. With appropriate federal tax credits we could be at 30-32 miles per gallon in five or seven years," Langan said.

Oil's four-year bull run to +$140 per barrel has increased the wealth of 'petrodollar' nations, and is about set to propel another shift, this time in the bond market.

Petroleum-exporting nations, such as Saudi Arabia and Russia are set to become the biggest creditor nations to the U.S. Government, Bloomberg News reported Monday.

Holdings of petrodollar nations increased 44% to $510 billion through April, Bloomberg News reported Monday -- an increase pace that's set to displace Japan, which holds the largest amount of U.S. Treasuries, at $592.2 billion.

Oil rose about 20 cents to $145.28 per barrel in late Monday afternoon trading.

The U.S. trade deficit fell to $59.8 billion in May (PDF file), the U.S. Commerce Department announced Friday, as exports rose at a much faster pace than imports in the month.

Economists surveyed by Bloomberg News had expected the May trade deficit to be $62.1 billion. The April trade deficit totaled $60.2 billion; March, $56.5 billion.

In May, exports increased to 0.9% to $157.5 billion. Imports increased 0.3% to a record $217.3 billion, with imported petroleum increasing 6.5% to $31.2 billion - - a cost component that accounted for almost the entire increase in the import total.

During May, the average price for a barrel of crude oil increased a record $9.47 to a record $106.28, the Commerce Department said.

U.S. exports shine again in May

Economist David H. Wang told BloggingStocks Friday the May trade deficit report "represents good news on an otherwise very sub-par economic landscape. Once again, as in April, if you take away oil and control for inflation, we can see a continued downward track in the deficit, led by rising exports," Wang said. "International demand for U.S. goods is a bright spot in our economy. Without it, we would be in a pronounced recession."

The dollar rose to its highest level in more than a week Monday morning on talk leaders at the G-8 summit in Japan will support the currency in an attempt to halt rising commodity prices.

The dollar strengthened about one-half cent versus the euro to $1.5629 and about 1 cent versus the British pound to $1.9659 in Monday morning trading. The dollar also rose about one-half yen to 107.66 versus Japan's yen.

Ian Stannard, a senior currency strategist at BNP Paribas SA (NASDAQ: BNPQY), France's largest bank, told Bloomberg News Monday that support for the dollar in the form of verbal invention continues, driven by the thesis that a stronger dollar, globally, is in everyone's interest.

Many economists agree that a falling and weak dollar has been a factor in rising commodity prices. Oil and other commodities tend to rise when the dollar falls as investors / traders seek to preserve purchasing power of the decreased value of dollar-denominated commodities by bidding their price up. However, economists differ regarding the extent of the weak dollar's commodity-inflation impact, with some arguing it is only a mild factor.

'Actions speak louder than words'

Further, economist Peter Dawson told BloggingStocks Monday, dollar bulls should not feel too emboldened by a verbal stance by the G-8.