<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd">
<channel>
<title>BloggingStocks</title>
<link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com</link>
<description>BloggingStocks</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[JPMorgan and Bank of America Report Perfect Trading Quarters]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/11/09/jp-morgan-and-bank-of-america-report-perfect-trading-quarters/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/11/09/jp-morgan-and-bank-of-america-report-perfect-trading-quarters/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/11/09/jp-morgan-and-bank-of-america-report-perfect-trading-quarters/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/earnings-reports/" rel="tag">Earnings Reports</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/jpm/" rel="tag">JPMorgan Chase (JPM)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/bac/" rel="tag">Bank of America (BAC)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/gs/" rel="tag">Goldman Sachs Group (GS)</a></p><p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2009/12/bac-logo-240.jpg" />So now, when you thought that Goldman Sachs Group Inc. (<a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/the-goldman-sachs-group-inc/gs/nys">GS</a>) was king of the hill, think twice. JPMorgan Chase &amp; Co. (<a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/jpmorgan-chase-and-co/jpm/nys">JPM</a>) and Bank of America Corp. (<a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/bank-of-america-corporation/bac/nys">BAC)</a> both racked up perfect trading quarters, according to the <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748704635704575604622108848674.html?mod=WSJ_hp_LEFTWhatsNewsCollection"><em>Wall Street Journal</em></a>.</p>
<p>JPMorgan had 12 days where it made more than $200 million each day. Bank of America had at least 25 days where it made more the $100 million from trading in the third quarter.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/11/09/jp-morgan-and-bank-of-america-report-perfect-trading-quarters/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>JPMorgan and Bank of America Report Perfect Trading Quarters</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/11/09/jp-morgan-and-bank-of-america-report-perfect-trading-quarters/">JPMorgan and Bank of America Report Perfect Trading Quarters</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 09 Nov 2010 17:30:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748704635704575604622108848674.html?mod=WSJ_hp_LEFTWhatsNewsCollection>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/11/09/jp-morgan-and-bank-of-america-report-perfect-trading-quarters/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19709856/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/11/09/jp-morgan-and-bank-of-america-report-perfect-trading-quarters/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>BAC</category><category>Bank of America</category><category>featured</category><category>Goldman Sachs</category><category>GS</category><category>inthenews</category><category>investment banks</category><category>JPM</category><category>JPMorgan</category><category>Morgan Stanley</category><category>MS</category><category>trading</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Connie Madon]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 09 Nov 2010 17:30:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Investing Ideas in an Unstable Market]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/06/29/investing-ideas-in-an-unstable-market/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/06/29/investing-ideas-in-an-unstable-market/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/06/29/investing-ideas-in-an-unstable-market/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/ETF-Investing/" rel="tag">ETF Investing</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/financial-crisis/" rel="tag">Financial Crisis</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2010/06/swedish-bear.jpg"  alt="bear market" />Well, well, well, it seems that the market has taken yet another <a target="_blank" href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/market-news/">bearish turn</a> ... some are even touting that we are in the midst of a double-dip recession. While others will argue that we are not in a double-dip recession, one thing is certain in this market -- uncertainty. <br />
<br />
Don't let the recent dips and dives in the market scare you away (<a target="_blank" href="http://news.yahoo.com/s/afp/20100629/ts_afp/useconomyobama_20100629170100">President Obama isn't</a>). There are ways to make money in unstable markets. Let's take a look at a way to make money in this market.<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/06/29/investing-ideas-in-an-unstable-market/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Investing Ideas in an Unstable Market</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/06/29/investing-ideas-in-an-unstable-market/">Investing Ideas in an Unstable Market</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 29 Jun 2010 16:40:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/06/29/investing-ideas-in-an-unstable-market/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19535595/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/06/29/investing-ideas-in-an-unstable-market/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>diversity</category><category>double dip recession</category><category>featured</category><category>investing</category><category>investment</category><category>investment advice</category><category>recession</category><category>trading</category><category>trading tips</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark Fightmaster]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 29 Jun 2010 16:40:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Have Exchanges Reached the Limits of Automated Trading?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/05/10/have-exchanges-reached-the-limits-of-automated-trading/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/05/10/have-exchanges-reached-the-limits-of-automated-trading/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/05/10/have-exchanges-reached-the-limits-of-automated-trading/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/indices/" rel="tag">Indices</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/djia/" rel="tag">DJIA</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/02/receessionpicutre.jpg"  alt="" />It may be months -- if not years -- before investors, experienced and otherwise, definitively learn what caused last week's market plunge -- a nearly 1,000-point dive intra-day that, even in the financial crisis era's volatile trading, amazed even veteran trading floor specialists. <br />
<br />
And that latter actor, or lack thereof, may prove to be the pivotal clue. While one doesn't want to indict technology before the evidence has been assembled and reviewed, the initial analysis suggests that some form of computer-to-computer, negative-spiral trading at least contributed to last Thursday's plunge in <a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/dow-jones-industrial-average/%24indu/dji">the Dow.</a> <p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/05/10/have-exchanges-reached-the-limits-of-automated-trading/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Have Exchanges Reached the Limits of Automated Trading?</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/05/10/have-exchanges-reached-the-limits-of-automated-trading/">Have Exchanges Reached the Limits of Automated Trading?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 10 May 2010 17:40:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/05/10/have-exchanges-reached-the-limits-of-automated-trading/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19471646/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/05/10/have-exchanges-reached-the-limits-of-automated-trading/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>stocks</category><category>Trademark</category><category>trading</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Joseph Lazzaro]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 10 May 2010 17:40:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Goldman Sachs Sets New Record for $100 Million Trading Days]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/03/02/goldman-sachs-sets-new-record-for-100-million-trading-days/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/03/02/goldman-sachs-sets-new-record-for-100-million-trading-days/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/03/02/goldman-sachs-sets-new-record-for-100-million-trading-days/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/competitive-strategy/" rel="tag">Competitive Strategy</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/gs/" rel="tag">Goldman Sachs Group (GS)</a></p><p><img hspace="4" vspace="4" border="1" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2010/02/goldman-sachs-logo-240.jpg" />Goldman Sachs (<a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/the-goldman-sachs-group-inc/gs/nys">GS</a>) has topped its previous record of $100 million dollar trading days. According to <a href="http://sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/886982/000095012310018464/y81914e10vk.htm#130">filings</a> with the Securities and Exchange Commission, the bank made at least $100 million in net trading revenue on 131 days last year. Its previous record, set in 2008, was for 90 days of $100 million plus revenue.</p>
<p>Last year, during 263 trading days, Goldman lost money on only 19 days. Otherwise, it hit the jackpot pretty much every other day.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/03/02/goldman-sachs-sets-new-record-for-100-million-trading-days/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Goldman Sachs Sets New Record for $100 Million Trading Days</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/03/02/goldman-sachs-sets-new-record-for-100-million-trading-days/">Goldman Sachs Sets New Record for $100 Million Trading Days</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 02 Mar 2010 09:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/a6ce91f6-256f-11df-9cdb-00144feab49a.html>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/03/02/goldman-sachs-sets-new-record-for-100-million-trading-days/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19378820/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/03/02/goldman-sachs-sets-new-record-for-100-million-trading-days/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>featured</category><category>Goldman Sachs</category><category>high-speed trading</category><category>inthenews</category><category>investing</category><category>investment bank</category><category>trading</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Connie Madon]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 02 Mar 2010 09:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Why Money Magazine Got It Right (Mostly)]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/01/21/why-money-magazine-got-it-right-mostly/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/01/21/why-money-magazine-got-it-right-mostly/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/01/21/why-money-magazine-got-it-right-mostly/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/aapl/" rel="tag">Apple Inc (AAPL)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/f/" rel="tag">Ford Motor (F)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/xom/" rel="tag">Exxon Mobil (XOM)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/jnj/" rel="tag">Johnson and Johnson (JNJ)</a></p><p><img hspace="4" vspace="4" border="1" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/10/coffee_stock.jpg" />As we move gradually closer to a stable economy where retail investors are again ready to enter the markets, we see a lot written about which stocks, sectors, and investment types are smart bets for future growth.</p>
<p>Money Magazine recently ran a piece in their Investor's Guide 2010 series entitled "<a href="http://money.cnn.com/2010/01/13/pf/stock_picks.moneymag/">10 Stocks That Can Keep Running</a>," which offers three areas in which the markets are likely to be solid in the coming years. This author's opinion is they were mostly right. But there needs to be a little more explanation for the average retail investor.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/01/21/why-money-magazine-got-it-right-mostly/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Why Money Magazine Got It Right (Mostly)</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/01/21/why-money-magazine-got-it-right-mostly/">Why Money Magazine Got It Right (Mostly)</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 21 Jan 2010 17:20:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/01/21/why-money-magazine-got-it-right-mostly/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19325087/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/01/21/why-money-magazine-got-it-right-mostly/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>dividends</category><category>dowjones</category><category>economy</category><category>investing</category><category>markets</category><category>recession</category><category>stocks</category><category>trading</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Ryan Teeples]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 21 Jan 2010 17:20:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Corn Futures Got Hammered This Week]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/01/15/corn-futures-got-hammered-this-week/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/01/15/corn-futures-got-hammered-this-week/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/01/15/corn-futures-got-hammered-this-week/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/forecasts/" rel="tag">Forecasts</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/brazil/" rel="tag">Brazil</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/marketmatters/" rel="tag">Market Matters</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/economic-data/" rel="tag">Economic Data</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/commodities/" rel="tag">Commodities</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/agriculture/" rel="tag">Agriculture</a></p><p><img hspace="4" alt="" vspace="4" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2010/01/corn-truck-240.jpg" />Why are corn futures down so much? It seems that two factors converged to drive the price down by 49 cents to $3.76 per bushel this week: The first is supply and the second is reduced shipment.<br /><br />On the supply side, the Department of Agriculture issued its report of crop production on January 12. The <a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601103&amp;sid=aWwqW0dGCMMc">nation's harvest</a> was estimated to be 13.151 billion bushels, up 8.8% from a year ago. And that's not all, global supplies will add to the pricing pressure as <a href="http://www.businessweek.com/news/2010-01-13/corn-soybeans-extend-drop-as-record-harvests-add-to-stockpiles.html">global supplies of corn</a>, wheat, rice and soybeans are expected to be up 8.3%, to the highest level since 2002.</p>
<p>Prices could <a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/idUSN1212670720100112?type=marketsNews">drop even further</a> after the Brazil and Argentina harvests, due to start next month.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/01/15/corn-futures-got-hammered-this-week/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Corn Futures Got Hammered This Week</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/01/15/corn-futures-got-hammered-this-week/">Corn Futures Got Hammered This Week</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 15 Jan 2010 10:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.futuresview.com/margins1.htm>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/01/15/corn-futures-got-hammered-this-week/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19318202/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/01/15/corn-futures-got-hammered-this-week/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>commodities</category><category>corn</category><category>corn supply</category><category>CornSupply</category><category>featured</category><category>futures</category><category>trading</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Connie Madon]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 15 Jan 2010 10:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Cisco posts strong Q1 earnings]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/04/cisco-csco-posts-strong-q1-earnings/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/04/cisco-csco-posts-strong-q1-earnings/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/04/cisco-csco-posts-strong-q1-earnings/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/earnings-reports/" rel="tag">Earnings Reports</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/forecasts/" rel="tag">Forecasts</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/good-news/" rel="tag">Good news</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/csco/" rel="tag">Cisco Systems (CSCO)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/marketmatters/" rel="tag">Market Matters</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/technology/" rel="tag">Technology</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/recession/" rel="tag">Recession</a></p><img border="0" hspace="4" alt="cisco first quarter earnings" vspace="4" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/08/cisco080607.gif" />Following today's market close, technology giant <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/cisco-systems-inc/csco/nas">Cisco Systems</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/cisco-systems-inc/csco/nas">CSCO</a>) had its chance to impress Wall Street with <a href="http://www.thestreet.com/_aol/story/10622109/1/cisco-nails-it-sees-healing-economy.html?cm_ven=AOL&amp;cm_cat=Free&amp;cm_pla=Feed&amp;cm_ite=Feed">its fiscal first quarter results</a>, and the company did not disappoint.<br /><br />Going into this afternoon's earnings report, analysts had been expecting to see the company show earnings of 31 cents per share, but the company surprised to the upside by posting actual earnings of 36 cents per share for its fiscal first quarter. For the same period last year the company had earnings of 42 cents per share.<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/04/cisco-csco-posts-strong-q1-earnings/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Cisco posts strong Q1 earnings</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/04/cisco-csco-posts-strong-q1-earnings/">Cisco posts strong Q1 earnings</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 04 Nov 2009 18:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/04/cisco-csco-posts-strong-q1-earnings/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19223710/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/04/cisco-csco-posts-strong-q1-earnings/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>after hours</category><category>Cisco</category><category>CSCO</category><category>earnings</category><category>featured</category><category>forecast</category><category>inthenews</category><category>technology</category><category>trading</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Michael Fowlkes]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 18:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Microsoft downgrade: Trading opportunity?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/01/microsoft-downgrade-trading-opportunity/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/01/microsoft-downgrade-trading-opportunity/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/01/microsoft-downgrade-trading-opportunity/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/analyst-upgrades-and-downgrades/" rel="tag">Analyst Upgrades and Downgrades</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/msft/" rel="tag">Microsoft (MSFT)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/technology/" rel="tag">Technology</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/12/msft.jpg" />As I write this, shares of <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/microsoft-corporation/msft/nas">Microsoft</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/microsoft-corporation/msft/nas">MSFT</a>) are down well over 3% to $24.83. That's a drop of 89 cents per share. The catalyst? A downgrade from <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/the-goldman-sachs-group-inc/gs/nys">Goldman Sachs</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/the-goldman-sachs-group-inc/gs/nys">GS</a>).
<p>According to <a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601103&amp;sid=a9cne46pdpjA">Bloomberg</a>, the institution removed the software giant from its conviction buy list. There's concern that the first quarter won't be overwhelmingly positive. Understandably, Wall Street got a little nervous and decided to book some profits. Microsoft has had a decent run as of late. </p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/01/microsoft-downgrade-trading-opportunity/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Microsoft downgrade: Trading opportunity?</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/01/microsoft-downgrade-trading-opportunity/">Microsoft downgrade: Trading opportunity?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 01 Oct 2009 15:20:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601103&amp;sid=a9cne46pdpjA>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/01/microsoft-downgrade-trading-opportunity/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19181090/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/01/microsoft-downgrade-trading-opportunity/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>goldman sachs</category><category>GoldmanSachs</category><category>GS</category><category>inthenews</category><category>Microsoft</category><category>MSFT</category><category>software</category><category>tech stocks</category><category>TechStocks</category><category>trading</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Steven Mallas]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 01 Oct 2009 15:20:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Interested in buying some General Motors stock?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/08/20/interested-in-buying-some-general-motors-stock/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/08/20/interested-in-buying-some-general-motors-stock/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/08/20/interested-in-buying-some-general-motors-stock/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/internet/" rel="tag">Internet</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/gm/" rel="tag">General Motors (GM)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/marketmatters/" rel="tag">Market Matters</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/cvs/" rel="tag">CVS Corp (CVS)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/pg/" rel="tag">Procter and Gamble (PG)</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="right" alt="motors liquidation" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/12/money-losers-2-american-investor-200cm121808.jpg" />If you are one of the investors out there watching General Motors stock each day trying to pick the perfect time to buy the stock... <strong>don't</strong>! For whatever reason, people have <a href="http://money.aol.com/article/traders-keep-buying-old-gm-stock-despite/632401">continued to buy General Motors stock</a>, despite the fact that the company and the government have issued warnings that the stock is destined to be worthless.<br /><br />I read an interesting article that reported yesterday there were 12.6 million shares of General Motors traded. Maybe people do not realize that the company went into bankruptcy, or maybe they are just trying to profit off of traders that are not aware that <strong>this is not</strong> new General Motors stock, but the volumes are a bit curious.<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/08/20/interested-in-buying-some-general-motors-stock/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Interested in buying some General Motors stock?</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/08/20/interested-in-buying-some-general-motors-stock/">Interested in buying some General Motors stock?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 20 Aug 2009 18:10:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/08/20/interested-in-buying-some-general-motors-stock/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19135746/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/08/20/interested-in-buying-some-general-motors-stock/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Ameritrade</category><category>Capital One</category><category>CapitalOne</category><category>CVS</category><category>featured</category><category>General Motors</category><category>GeneralMotors</category><category>GM</category><category>investing</category><category>motors liquidation co</category><category>MotorsLiquidationCo</category><category>penny stocks</category><category>PennyStocks</category><category>procter and gamble</category><category>ProcterAndGamble</category><category>Scottrade</category><category>stocks</category><category>trading</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Michael Fowlkes]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 20 Aug 2009 18:10:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[How to avoid falling into the data mining trap]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/08/10/how-to-avoid-falling-into-the-data-mining-trap/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/08/10/how-to-avoid-falling-into-the-data-mining-trap/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/08/10/how-to-avoid-falling-into-the-data-mining-trap/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/marketmatters/" rel="tag">Market Matters</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/mandftoday/" rel="tag">Money and Finance Today</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/personalfinance/" rel="tag">Personal Finance</a></p><p><img border="1" hspace="4" alt="" vspace="4" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/10/nyse-floor.jpg" /> Are you looking for Nirvana when you invest? Forget about it. It doesn't exist.</p>
<p>Let's start with two big losers that relied on financial data and ended up on the trash heap. First we have <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Long-Term_Capital_Management">Long Term Capital</a>. Founded by John Meriwether, Robert C. Merton, and Myron Scholes. They formed the largest hedge fund in the U.S. in the 1990s with an estimated 4.6 billion in capital. Merton and Scholes had won the Nobel Prize in economics for developing a pricing model for options called the "Black Scholes Model." Since both men had won the Nobel Prize, this should have been Nirvana. Now comes along the Russian financial crisis and Long Term Capital was on the wrong side of history. They took such a beating that the Federal Reserve had to help bail them out for a time until they went bust in 2000.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/08/10/how-to-avoid-falling-into-the-data-mining-trap/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>How to avoid falling into the data mining trap</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/08/10/how-to-avoid-falling-into-the-data-mining-trap/">How to avoid falling into the data mining trap</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 10 Aug 2009 15:30:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://online.wsj.com/article/SB124967937642715417.html>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/08/10/how-to-avoid-falling-into-the-data-mining-trap/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19123645/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/08/10/how-to-avoid-falling-into-the-data-mining-trap/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>data mining</category><category>DataMining</category><category>David Li</category><category>inthenews</category><category>JPM</category><category>Long Term Capital</category><category>LongTermCapital</category><category>trading</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Connie Madon]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 10 Aug 2009 15:30:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Goldman Sachs sets record for $100 million trading days]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/08/05/goldman-sachs-sets-record-for-100-million-trading-days/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/08/05/goldman-sachs-sets-record-for-100-million-trading-days/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/08/05/goldman-sachs-sets-record-for-100-million-trading-days/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/management/" rel="tag">Management</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/competitive-strategy/" rel="tag">Competitive Strategy</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/marketmatters/" rel="tag">Market Matters</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/gs/" rel="tag">Goldman Sachs Group (GS)</a></p><p><img border="1" hspace="4" alt="" vspace="4" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2009/07/goldman_160.jpg" /><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/the-goldman-sachs-group-inc/gs/nys">Goldman Sachs &amp; Co. Inc.</a> (NYSE <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/the-goldman-sachs-group-inc/gs/nys">GS</a>) is a powerhouse when it comes to making money from trading. Goldman is now a bank and receives all the benefits that come with its new banking status.</p>
<p>As for Goldman's trading profits, the firm had 46 separate days in the second quarter in which <a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&amp;sid=azB7kHpYKRy4">trading revenues were $100,000</a>, setting a new record. This compares with 34 $100 million days in the first quarter.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/08/05/goldman-sachs-sets-record-for-100-million-trading-days/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Goldman Sachs sets record for $100 million trading days</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/08/05/goldman-sachs-sets-record-for-100-million-trading-days/">Goldman Sachs sets record for $100 million trading days</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 05 Aug 2009 12:10:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/08/05/goldman-sachs-sets-record-for-100-million-trading-days/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19119830/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/08/05/goldman-sachs-sets-record-for-100-million-trading-days/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Goldman Sachs</category><category>GS</category><category>inthenews</category><category>trading</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Connie Madon]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 05 Aug 2009 12:10:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Cramer on BloggingStocks: Dirty manipulation ]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/06/cramer-on-bloggingstocks-dirty-manipulation/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/06/cramer-on-bloggingstocks-dirty-manipulation/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/06/cramer-on-bloggingstocks-dirty-manipulation/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/marketmatters/" rel="tag">Market Matters</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/scandals/" rel="tag">Scandals</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/oil/" rel="tag">Oil</a></p><div id="thestreet_module"> <img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/06/jimcramer-profile.jpg" alt="" />
<div>
<h3>From <a href="http://www.thestreet.com">TheStreet.com</a> Network</h3>
<ul>
    <li><a href="http://www.thestreet.com/story/10533999/1/coming-week-earnings-fireworks-on-tap.html?puc=aoljjc">Coming Week: Earnings Fireworks on Tap </a></li>
    <li><a href="http://www.thestreet.com/story/10534601/1/oil-update-downward-spiral-continues.html?puc=aoljjc"> Oil Update: Downward Spiral Continues </a></li>
</ul>
</div>
</div>
<span style="font-style: italic;">TheStreet.com's Jim Cramer says it's a farce when a $10 million investment from one rogue trader can move oil up relatively easily. </span><br /><br />  Here are things that the commodities traders' lobby always stops: margin increases and any sort of regulation against manipulation. They always claim that the markets are too "deep" and they always have stats that back it up. We saw this in the commoditization of stock sectors that are now dominated and manipulated by power ultra futures. <br /><br />   The "deepness" of any sector is, of course, an illusion if you actually trade, but if you don't trade you are tempted to attribute anything to the rise and fall of a sector except manipulation, because manipulation means common-sense margin regulation, which cuts down on fees and therefore ruins the business. No one ever allows a cut in fees -- too much money at stake, too many politicians that can be easily bought, too many agency regulators that can easily be captured.  <br /><br />  Manipulation's just part of the game -- a sanctioned part. <p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/06/cramer-on-bloggingstocks-dirty-manipulation/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Cramer on BloggingStocks: Dirty manipulation </em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/06/cramer-on-bloggingstocks-dirty-manipulation/">Cramer on BloggingStocks: Dirty manipulation </a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 06 Jul 2009 10:10:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/06/cramer-on-bloggingstocks-dirty-manipulation/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19087618/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/06/cramer-on-bloggingstocks-dirty-manipulation/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>featured</category><category>jim cramer</category><category>JimCramer</category><category>oil</category><category>trading</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jim Cramer]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 10:10:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[My Activision Blizzard trade]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/02/my-activision-blizzard-trade/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/02/my-activision-blizzard-trade/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/02/my-activision-blizzard-trade/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/msft/" rel="tag">Microsoft (MSFT)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/sne/" rel="tag">Sony Corp ADR (SNE)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/erts/" rel="tag">Electronic Arts (ERTS)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/atvi/" rel="tag">Activision Inc (ATVI)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/technology/" rel="tag">Technology</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/ntdoy/" rel="tag">Nintendo (NTDOY)</a></p><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/activision-blizzard-inc/atvi/nas"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2009/03/activision_160.jpg" /></a><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/activision-blizzard-inc/atvi/nas">Activision Blizzard</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/activision-blizzard-inc/atvi/nas">ATVI</a>), a software publisher which competes with <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/electronic-arts-inc/erts/nas">Electronic Arts</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/electronic-arts-inc/erts/nas">ERTS</a>) and distributes games for consoles from <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/sony-corporation/sne/nys">Sony</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/sony-corporation/sne/nys">SNE</a>), <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/microsoft-corporation/msft/nas">Microsoft</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/microsoft-corporation/msft/nas">MSFT</a>), and <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/nintendo-co-ltd-unsp-adr/ntdoy/nao">Nintendo</a> (OTC: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/nintendo-co-ltd-unsp-adr/ntdoy/nao">NTDOY</a>), is a stock I own in a long-term account. I've been thinking about selling at times, but for now, I'm holding on. The long-term prospects still look good for the most part.
<p>But, I had been looking at various trading ideas and wanted to capture a shorter-term gain for a trading account. The market has been so tough this year. When the recent rally in the indexes started, I didn't want to become part of the group that was desperate to get in on the action, only to expose my portfolio to more risk than necessary. Believe me, when you're afraid of missing a rally, you just might end up with some bad timing. </p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/02/my-activision-blizzard-trade/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>My Activision Blizzard trade</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/02/my-activision-blizzard-trade/">My Activision Blizzard trade</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 02 Jul 2009 15:15:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/02/my-activision-blizzard-trade/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19085315/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/02/my-activision-blizzard-trade/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>activision blizzard</category><category>ActivisionBlizzard</category><category>ATVI</category><category>electronic arts</category><category>ElectronicArts</category><category>ERTS</category><category>inthenews</category><category>microsoft</category><category>MSFT</category><category>nintendo</category><category>NTDOY</category><category>SNE</category><category>sony</category><category>trading</category><category>video games</category><category>VideoGames</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Steven Mallas]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2009 15:15:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[The long &amp; short of Bernie Schaeffer's trades]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/06/05/the-long-and-short-of-bernie-schaeffers-trades/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/06/05/the-long-and-short-of-bernie-schaeffers-trades/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/06/05/the-long-and-short-of-bernie-schaeffers-trades/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/aapl/" rel="tag">Apple Inc (AAPL)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/xom/" rel="tag">Exxon Mobil (XOM)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/newsletters/" rel="tag">Newsletters</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/nflx/" rel="tag">Netflix, Inc. (NFLX)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/stock-screen/" rel="tag">Stock Screen</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/commodities/" rel="tag">Commodities</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/oil/" rel="tag">Oil</a></p><p>Options and trading specialist <a href="http://www.thestockadvisors.com/ccount/click.php?id=3172 ">Bernie Schaeffer</a> selects stocks based on a combination of fundamental, technical and sentiment-based metrics. </p>
<p>His research leads to long trading positions for his <a href="http://www.thestockadvisors.com/ccount/click.php?id=3172 ">Schaeffer's Master Portfolio</a> and short trading plays for his <a href="http://www.thestockadvisors.com/ccount/click.php?id=3172 ">Schaeffer's Short Selling</a> services. </p>
<p>Here's a long at four of his latest trading ideas -- long positions in <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/netflix-inc/nflx/nas">Netflix</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/netflix-inc/nflx/nas">NFLX</a>) and <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/vmware-inc/vmw/nys">VMware</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/vmware-inc/vmw/nys">VMW</a>) as well as short position in <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/exxon-mobil-corporation/xom/nys">Exxon Mobil</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/exxon-mobil-corporation/xom/nys">XOM</a>) and <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/apple-inc/aapl/nas">Apple</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/apple-inc/aapl/nas">AAPL</a>).</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/06/05/the-long-and-short-of-bernie-schaeffers-trades/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>The long &amp; short of Bernie Schaeffer's trades</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/06/05/the-long-and-short-of-bernie-schaeffers-trades/">The long &amp; short of Bernie Schaeffer's trades</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 05 Jun 2009 11:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/06/05/the-long-and-short-of-bernie-schaeffers-trades/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19058704/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/06/05/the-long-and-short-of-bernie-schaeffers-trades/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>aapl</category><category>apple</category><category>bernie schaeffer</category><category>BernieSchaeffer</category><category>exxon mobil</category><category>ExxonMobil</category><category>netflix</category><category>nflx</category><category>options</category><category>schaeffers research</category><category>SchaeffersResearch</category><category>short selling</category><category>ShortSelling</category><category>steven halpern</category><category>thestockadvisors.com</category><category>trading</category><category>vmw</category><category>vmware</category><category>xom</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Steven Halpern]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 05 Jun 2009 11:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Evolution of a trade in First Solar]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/06/03/evolution-of-a-trade-in-first-solar/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/06/03/evolution-of-a-trade-in-first-solar/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/06/03/evolution-of-a-trade-in-first-solar/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/commodities/" rel="tag">Commodities</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/technology/" rel="tag">Technology</a></p><p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/12/first-solar-fslr-logo.gif" alt="" /><em>This post was written by <a href="http://www.minyanville.com">Minyanville</a> contributor Smita Sadana.</em></p>
<p>A trade doesn't simply have an initiation and finale - the most important part of a trade is its evolution and constant re-assessment if the original thesis that the trade was initiated with, still holds true.</p>
<p>On that note, let's look at <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/first-solar-inc/fslr/nas"><strong>First Solar</strong> </a>(NASDAQ:<a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/first-solar-inc/fslr/nas">FSLR</a>). I started a short position in it on <a href="http://www.minyanville.com/buzz/bookmark.php?id=106356&amp;s=m&amp;context=search&amp;chars=1">6/1</a> when instead of participating in the market advance, it lagged (due to a <em>LA Times</em> story that FSLR's acquisition of "strategic land rights" is under scrutiny). Recall, it came on the heels of a cautious mention in <em>Barron's</em> on May 26th. So, both times, FSLR reacted negatively to negative news and volume picked up on both those instances.</p>
<p>Today, Pacific Crest Securities reiterated its buy rating on FSLR and called the recent weakness a "buying opportunity."</p>
<p>I</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/06/03/evolution-of-a-trade-in-first-solar/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Evolution of a trade in First Solar</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/06/03/evolution-of-a-trade-in-first-solar/">Evolution of a trade in First Solar</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 03 Jun 2009 14:20:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.minyanville.com/>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/06/03/evolution-of-a-trade-in-first-solar/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19056305/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/06/03/evolution-of-a-trade-in-first-solar/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>energy</category><category>first solar</category><category>FirstSolar</category><category>fslr</category><category>solar</category><category>trading</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Todd Harrison]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 03 Jun 2009 14:20:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Coca-Cola: A bubbly trade?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/06/01/coca-cola-a-bubbly-trade/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/06/01/coca-cola-a-bubbly-trade/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/06/01/coca-cola-a-bubbly-trade/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/ko/" rel="tag">Coca-Cola (KO)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/pep/" rel="tag">PepsiCo (PEP)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/analysis/" rel="tag">Technical Analysis</a></p><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/the-coca-cola-company/ko/nys"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/04/coke_and_pepsi.jpg" /></a><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/the-coca-cola-company/ko/nys">Coca-Cola</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/the-coca-cola-company/ko/nys">KO</a>), the archrival of <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/pepsico-inc/pep/nys">PepsiCo</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/pepsico-inc/pep/nys">PEP</a>), has been acting very bubbly recently in terms of price action. I noticed it had a nice move on Friday. Others have noted the positive price change as well, including <a href="http://www.schaeffersresearch.com/commentary/optionbytes.aspx?c=bytefeed&amp;byteID=93254&amp;single=true">this item</a>, which discusses the option activity surrounding Coke and the overall technical position of the stock.
<p> </p>
<p>I've been pretty stunned by the rise in price. Usually, the stock is a sleepy thing that doesn't do much. Well, that's probably not entirely true, but if you've held the company in your portfolio as long as I've held it in mine, you know that it seems that way at least. I own Coke for the long-term because I love its dividend-paying characteristics. And I love its brand equity. I'm wondering, though, if Coke might make a good trade at the moment. Or, maybe I should start adding to my position before it takes too sharp a rise. </p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/06/01/coca-cola-a-bubbly-trade/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Coca-Cola: A bubbly trade?</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/06/01/coca-cola-a-bubbly-trade/">Coca-Cola: A bubbly trade?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 01 Jun 2009 15:40:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.schaeffersresearch.com/commentary/optionbytes.aspx?c=bytefeed&amp;byteID=93254&amp;single=true>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/06/01/coca-cola-a-bubbly-trade/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19053824/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/06/01/coca-cola-a-bubbly-trade/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>beverage industry</category><category>beverage stocks</category><category>BeverageIndustry</category><category>BeverageStocks</category><category>coca-cola</category><category>Coke</category><category>inthenews</category><category>KO</category><category>PEP</category><category>PepsiCo</category><category>trading</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Steven Mallas]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 01 Jun 2009 15:40:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Should you be trading Disney?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/05/26/should-you-be-trading-disney/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/05/26/should-you-be-trading-disney/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/05/26/should-you-be-trading-disney/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/analyst-upgrades-and-downgrades/" rel="tag">Analyst Upgrades and Downgrades</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/dis/" rel="tag">Walt Disney (DIS)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/via/" rel="tag">Viacom (VIA)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/cbs/" rel="tag">CBS Corp 'B' (CBS)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/nws/" rel="tag">News Corp'B' (NWS)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/media-world/" rel="tag">Media World</a></p><p><img alt="" hspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/09/walt-disney-company-dis-logo.jpg" align="right" vspace="4" border="1" />Every few months, it seems, we get an article or two that says <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/the-walt-disney-company/dis/nys">Disney</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/the-walt-disney-company/dis/nys">DIS</a>) might be a buy. <a href="http://www.thestreet.com/_aol/story/10505004/1/tsc-ratings-updates-disney.html?cm_ven=AOL&amp;cm_cat=Free&amp;cm_pla=Feed&amp;cm_ite=Feed">TheStreet.com</a> issued an upgrade on the stock based on several metrics. <a href="http://www.smartmoney.com/Investing/Short-Term-Investing/5-Stocks-Poised-to-Shine-This-Summer/?page=6">SmartMoney</a> believes Disney might be a great company for the summertime. </p>
<p>When it comes to Disney, every investor has to be careful. Take every analytical article with a grain of salt. Why? Because even though the fundamentals might be good on the company from a valuation standpoint, Disney's stock has disappointed investors many times in the past. As a long-term shareholder, I know what I'm talking about. And many other pundits have made the same observation: Disney always seems to be cheap to someone at any given time. </p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/05/26/should-you-be-trading-disney/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Should you be trading Disney?</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/05/26/should-you-be-trading-disney/">Should you be trading Disney?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 26 May 2009 10:20:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.thestreet.com/_aol/story/10505004/1/tsc-ratings-updates-disney.html?cm_ven=AOL&amp;cm_cat=Free&amp;cm_pla=Feed&amp;cm_ite=Feed>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href=http://www.smartmoney.com/Investing/Short-Term-Investing/5-Stocks-Poised-to-Shine-This-Summer/?page=6>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href=http://finance.aol.com/glossary/covered%20call>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/05/26/should-you-be-trading-disney/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1555978/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/05/26/should-you-be-trading-disney/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>CBS</category><category>covered call</category><category>CoveredCall</category><category>DIS</category><category>Disney</category><category>inthenews</category><category>media</category><category>Microsoft</category><category>MSFT</category><category>News Corp.</category><category>NewsCorp.</category><category>NWS</category><category>trading</category><category>VIA</category><category>Viacom</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Steven Mallas]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 26 May 2009 10:20:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Has the economy caused an NBA team to throw in the towel?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/19/has-the-economy-caused-an-nba-team-to-throw-in-the-towel/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/19/has-the-economy-caused-an-nba-team-to-throw-in-the-towel/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/19/has-the-economy-caused-an-nba-team-to-throw-in-the-towel/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/09/nba-logo.gif" alt="" />Turns out no one is safe from the economic downturn, not even an NBA franchise. The New Orleans Hornets dumped Tyson Chandler (and his paycheck of $12.3 million next year) on the Oklahoma City Thunder. The Hornets received Joe Smith and Chris Wilcox in return, along with the draft rights to DeVon Hardin. <br /><br />According to various outlets (including <a href="http://espn.com">ESPN.com</a>), the Hornets have long been shopping Chandler for "financial reasons." The two players received in return have contracts that expire at the end of the season, so this is the classic rent-a-player scenario for the Hornets. New Orleans' payroll was set to hit $77 million next season, and they felt strongly enough about keeping that number in check to deal Chandler. <p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/19/has-the-economy-caused-an-nba-team-to-throw-in-the-towel/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Has the economy caused an NBA team to throw in the towel?</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/19/has-the-economy-caused-an-nba-team-to-throw-in-the-towel/">Has the economy caused an NBA team to throw in the towel?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 19 Feb 2009 17:06:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/19/has-the-economy-caused-an-nba-team-to-throw-in-the-towel/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1464935/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/19/has-the-economy-caused-an-nba-team-to-throw-in-the-towel/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>business of sports</category><category>BusinessOfSports</category><category>contract</category><category>nba</category><category>sports</category><category>sports business</category><category>SportsBusiness</category><category>trading</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark Fightmaster]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 19 Feb 2009 17:06:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Was I right to buy Microsoft?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/14/was-i-right-to-buy-microsoft/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/14/was-i-right-to-buy-microsoft/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/14/was-i-right-to-buy-microsoft/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/msft/" rel="tag">Microsoft (MSFT)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/aapl/" rel="tag">Apple Inc (AAPL)</a></p><p><img hspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/08/microsoft-msft-logo.jpg" align="right" vspace="4" border="1" alt="" />So, I bought a stock this past week. <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/microsoft-corporation/msft/nas">Microsoft</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/microsoft-corporation/msft/nas">MSFT</a>). I was pretty happy about the purchase. Well, strike that. I was <em>sort of</em> happy about the purchase. I don't have to tell you why I hastily added that qualifier. The current recession, quite frankly, is unlike any genus of recession we've seen before. A new taxonomical category needs to be reserved for it, and subsequently studied, so that we may learn to recognize the damn beast the next time it begins to rear its ugly Cloverfield-like head on the financial landscape. Ergo, it's scary to put money down on anything.</p>
<p>But Microsoft seems to be holding up fairly well as of late. And I'm glad that its <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/22/options-update-microsoft-volatility-elevated-shares-near-11-ye/">bad earnings</a> report is out of the way. I bought some shares at $19.30. I'm a little down right now, but I'm hoping that I can get maybe a dollar move out of this position (I might even settle for a little less than that, actually). Yes, I do think Microsoft is most likely a good longer-term bet, but I frankly was looking for the safest trading vehicle I could find. I'm more than certain I didn't find such an ideal concept, but here's my thinking: Microsoft's stock has a decent yield, the company generates a ton of cash, the shares have bounced off their lows, and I figure there's a possibility that I can get an opportunity to sell on a nice intraday move when market sentiment is, at least temporarily, giddy and bullish. Hey, even in a recession as raging as Bill O'Reilly's temper, you get those days.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/14/was-i-right-to-buy-microsoft/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Was I right to buy Microsoft?</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/14/was-i-right-to-buy-microsoft/">Was I right to buy Microsoft?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Sat, 14 Feb 2009 14:40:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/22/options-update-microsoft-volatility-elevated-shares-near-11-ye/>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href=http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/13/microsoft-msft-a-store-just-like-apples-aapl/>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/14/was-i-right-to-buy-microsoft/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1460231/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/14/was-i-right-to-buy-microsoft/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>AAPL</category><category>Apple</category><category>Microsoft</category><category>MSFT</category><category>retail</category><category>trading</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Steven Mallas]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 14 Feb 2009 14:40:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[E*Trade misses in Q4, but stock rises anyway]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/28/e-trade-misses-in-q4-but-stock-rises-anyway/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/28/e-trade-misses-in-q4-but-stock-rises-anyway/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/28/e-trade-misses-in-q4-but-stock-rises-anyway/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/earnings-reports/" rel="tag">Earnings Reports</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/schw/" rel="tag">Charles Schwab Corp (SCHW)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/amtd/" rel="tag">TD AmeriTrade Holding (AMTD)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/etfc/" rel="tag">E*TRADE (ETFC)</a></p><p><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/e-trade-financial-corporation/etfc/nas">E Trade Financial Corporation</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/e-trade-financial-corporation/etfc/nas">ETFC</a>), which competes with <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/td-ameritrade-holding-corporation/amtd/nas">TD Ameritrade Holding Corporation</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/td-ameritrade-holding-corporation/amtd/nas">AMTD</a>) and <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/charles-schwab-corporation-the/schw/nas">Charles Schwab</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/charles-schwab-corporation-the/schw/nas">SCHW</a>), is doing splendidly today. As I write this, the stock is up well over 15%. But I would not touch this one with a ten-foot pole, as they say.</p>
<p>According to this <a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/marketsnews/idINN2746836320090127?rpc=33">article</a>, E*Trade reported a quarterly loss on Tuesday of $0.50 per share. While that was a lot better than the $3.98 per-share loss reported in last year's Q4, it wasn't enough to beat expectations. Wall Street was hoping for a loss of $0.24 per share. E*Trade said in its <a href="http://www.tradingmarkets.com/.site/news/Stock%20News/2145541/">press release</a> that daily average revenue trades increased 18% and that 97,000 new accounts were captured. While both of those stats are impressive to a certain degree, an investor must keep in mind that E*Trade is a complicated story. The company really screwed itself by exposing its shareholders to so much financial risk; sure, that might be hindsight now, but it nevertheless is true. And with all the loan provisions and all the issues with the company's involvement with applying for the government's TARP initiative, etc., I can tell you that I absolutely would not want to play around with this stock.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/28/e-trade-misses-in-q4-but-stock-rises-anyway/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>E*Trade misses in Q4, but stock rises anyway</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/28/e-trade-misses-in-q4-but-stock-rises-anyway/">E*Trade misses in Q4, but stock rises anyway</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 28 Jan 2009 15:34:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.reuters.com/article/marketsnews/idINN2746836320090127?rpc=33>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/28/e-trade-misses-in-q4-but-stock-rises-anyway/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1443576/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/28/e-trade-misses-in-q4-but-stock-rises-anyway/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>AMTD</category><category>brokers</category><category>charles schwab</category><category>CharlesSchwab</category><category>ETFC</category><category>Etrade</category><category>SCHW</category><category>TARP</category><category>td ameritrade</category><category>TdAmeritrade</category><category>trading</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Steven Mallas]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 28 Jan 2009 15:34:00 EST</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
